ISSN 0353-9644

CXXII 34

2009

 :

11000 , . 13/II
: +381 11/32 39 875 : 32 37 082
www.advokatska-komora.rs
:
. (1887. 18971901); (18881890);
(19021906. 19251926);
(19271930); (19311933); (1934);
(19351937); (19381941);
(, 19761981); (, 19821984);
(, 19851990); (19911995);
(19952002)

_______ _______

_______ _______

, , . , ,
, , ,
, , , ,
, . , ,
, , (Imme Roxin), ,
, , , ,
, , ,
:

_______ _______

11000 , 13/II .: +381 11/32 39 875 : 32 37 082
. 800 ,
250 . . .
: 11000 , 13/II,
: . - : 205-12358-68
, 413-00-1737/2001-04,
21. 2001. , .
1.000
,

ISSN 0353-9644

Stamp
Bar Association of Serbia

BRANI
Journal of Legal Theory and Practice
of the Bar Association of Serbia
Year CXXII New series Number 34

Belgrade
2009

Owner and publisher:

BAR ASSOCIATION OF SERBIA
11000 Beograd, Deanska 13/11
Telephone:+381 11/32 39 875 Fax: 32 37 082
www.advokatska-komora.rs
Previous editors-in-chief:

Milan St. MARKOVI (1887 and 1897-1901); ore NENADOVI (1888-1890);

Dobrivoje Dobra PETKOVI (1902-1906 and 1925-1926); Ljubomir STEFANOVI
(1927-1930); Obrad BLAGOJEVI, PhD (1931-1933); Vidan BLAGOJEVI, PhD (1934);
Radoje VUKEVI, PhD (1935-1937); Vladimir SIMI (1938-1941); Aleksandar MIKULI,
PhD (Advocacy; 1976-1981); Gorazd OGUREK (Advocacy; 1982-1984); Mihailo MLADENOVI (Advocacy, 1985-1990); Miroslav DINI (1991-1995); ivojin ESTI (1995-2002)
Editor-in-chief
_______ _______

Nedeljko JOVANEVI, PhD

Lawyer in Belgrade

Editorial Board:
_______ _______

Rajna ANDRI, a lawyer in Belgrade, prof. Momilo GRUBA, PhD, from Novi Sad,
Radonja DUBLJEVI, PhD, a lawyer in Belgrade, Docent Marko UREVI, PhD, Faculty
of Law in Belgrade, Rade JANKOVI, lawyer in Boljevac, Stania PAUNOVI, M.A., a
lawyer from Kuevo, prof. ore LAZIN, PhD , Faculty of Law in Belgrade, Borislav
RAOVI, a lawyer from Podgorica, Imme ROXIN, PhD, a lawyer from Munich, Slobodan
STOJANOVI, M.A., lawyer in Belgrade, Mirko TRIPKOVI, a lawyer in Belgrade, Milinko
TRIFKOVI, a laywer in Zemun, Nenad DELEBDI , lawyer in Belgrade

Prepress: Duan asi

Address of the Redaction

_______ _______

ADVOKATSKA KOMORA SRBIJE

11000 Beograd, Deanska 13/II Tel.:+381 11/32 39 875 Fax: 32 37 082
Brani is published quarterly. Annual subscription is 800 dinars, and a single issue is 250 dinars.
Manuscripts are witheld. Contributions to the journal are not paid.
Subscription: ADVOKATSKA KOMORA SRBIJE 11000 Beograd, Deanska 13/II, attention:
for Brani. Drawing account number: 205-12358-68
According to the opinion of the Ministry of Culture o the Republic of Serbia, number
413-00-1737/2001-04, of December 21st 2001, the journal is exempt from paying sales tax.
Circulation: 1000 copies
Printed by public company SLUBENI GLASNIK, Belgrade

.
................................... 9

............................................................ 29

: ............................. 39


................................... 45

, ............................... 61

............... 75

............................... 81
a
je
..................................... 95

.

............................................................................................... 105

........ 109

34/2009

.

..................................................................................... 113

.................................... 115
IN memoRIAm

(19472010) ........................................... 117

. (19352010) ......................................................... 119

TABLe oF CoNTeNTS

ARTICLeS

Goran P. Ili, PhD

On Innovations in the Code of Criminal Procedures .............................

Nedeljko Jovanevi, PhD

The Problems with Case Law ................................................................

29

Slobodan Stojanovi, m.a.

The Hague Tribunal: Sleeping of the Presiding Judge .........................

39

Emir orovi, m.a.

Proceedings for Imposing the Security Measures of the
Compulsory Treatment of Drug Addicts and Alcoholics ......................

45

Duan Radoevi
Factual Assertions, Value Judgements and Slander .............................

61

Luka Breneselovi
Calories and Kilocalories Short Note to the Legislator .....................

75

Petar Rakoevi
No-fault Liability of the Medical Staff ................................................. 81
ore Sarapa,m.a.
Is Foreign Law a Law or a Fact when Applied
on the Foundation of Conflict of Laws ................................................. 95
DISCUSSIoNS

Milan S. Jankovi, m.a.

Anent the Newest Amendments and Annexes of the Law
on Civil Action .....................................................................................

105

ure Ninkovi
Legal Consequences of the Closure of European Airspace ................

109

34/2009

JUBILeeS CeRemoNIeS

Tomislav . Dedi
A Word of Gratitude on the Awarding of Plaquette
of the Bar Association of Serbia .........................................................

113

ReVIeWS

Nedeljko Jovanev
Scientific Meeting Terrorism and Human Freedoms .....................

115

IN memoRIAm

Milo Markovi Mia (19472010) ..................................................

117

ore V. Boovi (19352010) ...........................................................

119

UDK: 343.13(497.11)

I
,1 .

2001. ( : )2 ( : )3 ( : ),4
2006. ,5 1
( , 72/2009).
2
( , . 70/2001 68/2002
, . 58/2004, 85/2005, 115/2005, 85/2005 . , 49/2007,
20/2009 . 72/2009).
3
( , 98/2006).
4
( , . 85/2005, 88/2005 ., 107/2005
., 72/2009 111/2009).
5
( , . 46/2006, 49/2007
122/2008).

10

34/2009

, 2009.
.
, , ( 136 . 10 11 ),
( 236 . 2 6 ), (. 282 282 ),
15 ( 299 2 ),
( 385 2 ),
( 395 1 ),
(. 110 112 2009) .
,
.
4 ,
. , 5
,
( 29 ). ,
.
I, , 18. .
,6

( 18. 1. ). ,
o .7 , 6

S. Guinchard, J. Buisson, Procdure pnale, 2e dition, Litec Groupe LexisNexis, Paris,

2002, 463.
7
. , , , , , , 1980, 19.

11

,
, .8

- (beyond a reasonable doubt). XVII XVIII
,9 , ,
.10
,
- ,11
18 1
.
, . , .
, ,
(. 253 254 ), (. 217 274
), ( 449 ),
( 459 ), ( 506 ) . , ,
,
(. 33 34 ),
(. 35 36 ), ( 143 ), ( 194 2 ) .12
2009.
. in dubio pro reo 8
. , , , , , 1981, 315.
9
:
(
).
10
J. R. Spencer, Evidence, in M. Delmas-Marty and J. R. Spencer (Edited by), European
Criminal Procedures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002, 600.
11
: Ibid., 601, 602; . , , 2 , , , 2002, 534-538; . , ,
, , 2005, 504.
12
: . , op. cit., 41, 42.

12

34/2009

.13 2006.
,

( 18 3 ).
, 112 2 . stricto sensu,
.
,
.
, .
, ,14 , , sine qua non .
2009.
. ,

( 236 1 ).
, ( 236 2 ).
, , 236 1 .

, . 13
: In favorem defensions hommage , , CXXII,
, . 1, , 2009, 35-42.
14
F. Tulkens, Negotiated justice, in M. Delmas-Marty and J. R. Spencer (Edited by), European Criminal Procedures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002, 649.

13

, , , ,
( 236 . 6 7 ).
( 24 1
in fine 433 ),
15 (
236 6 ), ( 236 7 ). ,
( 236 8 ).

,16
? ,

,
236 . 236 7
, ,
236 . 2 6 .
( 236 2 ) , , ( , 244
1 ), .
236
237
. 237 236
,
15

236 6 .
, 523 1 ( , . 152/2008 76/2009)
. ,
.
16

14

34/2009

,
( 236 . 2 7 )? , ,
( 18
3 ). , , ,
,17 18
3 . de lege ferenda
237

.

II

. ,
( 136 ). ,
, , ( 136
1 ).

. ,

.
.
,
, , .
2009.
.18

17

. , , , ,
2009, 41.
18
:
.

15

31. 12. 2008.

2.373
6.709
218
42
191
168
9.701

30. 11. 2009.

2.941
7.260
242
43
232
256
10.974

%
23,93%
8,21%
11,00%
2.28%
21,46%
52,38%
13,12%

,
,
( 136 10 ).
, ,
, , ( 136 11 ).

( 136 2 ). ,


.

(
136 9 ).
,
( 53 1 ).


.19
,
, .20 ,
19

. , , , , 2006,

20

Ibid., 199.

198.

16

34/2009

136 9 ,

. de lege ferenda 139 9
,
,
.

, ,
23. 2008. . ,
, 21
.22
.23
, .
, ,
.

5 3 .
,
, . ,

21
M. Delmas-Marty, Introduction, in M. Delmas-Marty (sous la direction de), Procdures pnales dEurope (Allemagne, Angleterre et pays de Galles, Belgique, France, Italie), Presse
Universitaire de France, Paris, 1995, 2830.
22
R. De Gouttes, Droit pnal et droits de lhomme, Revue de science criminelle et de droit pnal compar, N 1, Paris, 2000, 135.
23
P. Mayer, Lapplicabilit directe des conventions internationales relatives aux droits de
lhomme, in M. Delmas-Marty, C. Lucas de Leyssac (sous la direction de), Liberts et droits fondamentaux Introduction, textes et commentaires, deuxime dition, Seuil, Paris, 2002, 311, 312.

17

. ,
, .
,
( 142 1 ).
, ,
,
.
, , . , , .
,
( 142 5 ).
48 142 . 1 4. ( 143 7
).
, ,
.
( 142 4 ) , ,

( 228 )? ,
, .

, .
, 142 5 ,
?
,
, ,

18

34/2009

, ?
,
, .24 , 143
7 .

( 144 3 ). ,
. ,

, , 401 1 ,
.
,
.
,
, , ,
, (
401 4 ).
, , 25
,26 .
, ?
24
, . 28 . 1 2 ( , 20/2009)
. : ,
.
25
, , .
26
, . , , ,
( 401 3 ).

19

,
.27
401 4 ,
,
,
. ,
146 . 2 3 ,
.
, 4 401 .

, . ,
,
24 48 .
,
.

III
(. 113 132 )
132
, . 28 (
131
27
. , , 1980, 566, 567.
28
, .
( 132 3 )
.

20

34/2009

1 ),
,
. , , 29
, , (
6 132 ), .

132 . , ,
( 132 3 ).30 , ,
,
( 132 4 ).
( 132 6 ),
(, ) bona fides.
( 132 7 ), 4 132 .

( 132 ).
,
29
, , , 132 . 9 132 ,
, , . , , 9 1 . 3 7 132 , , . .
30

: , ?

21

.
2009. ,

.
, 377 5
. ,
385 2 , .

385 2 , ,
.
( 379 ), 309 ? ,
( 309 1 )?
j
j
j .31 j
j .
, , , 309 1
.
, ( 385 2 ), j j j
.
j ultra petita,
j. j
32 ( 378
31

. , op. cit., 619.

( ) (
)
. . , op. cit., 542, 543.
32

22

34/2009

4 ) j
( 379 326 4
340 2 348 1 350 1 )
j .
j j


.
j j j
j j.
j
j
. j

j j , j ,
j j. j j j j

j j
j. ,
reformatio in peius.
309
(
389 2 ). j j j
( 394 1 ) j j j
jj ( 394 . 2 3 ).33
,
33

. Ibid., 562.

23

309 4 . .
, .
, 2009.
.
( 433
1 ). , ,
.
,

( 436 1 2 ).

2009. , , 433 1 , ? ,
436 1 2
, ?

, , , . ,
436 1 2 .
446 3 .
. ,
,

24

34/2009

( 433 2 ),
.

, , ( 446
3 ). , 433 2 , ,

( 446 3 in fine ).
2009. (
) ( ) ,
?
, 446 3 in fine 443 2 , 433
2 . 443 , 433 2
, 2009. .

? ,
.


.
.

( 433
1 ), .
244 6 ,
.
Argumentum a contrario,

25

( 244 . 1 5 ).

, .
(. 455 458 ).
.
( 455 2 ), , , 433 1 , .

? ,
.
, ,
, , ( 455 1 ).

( 456 1 ),
, 2009. ,
, .

, , ,

.34 ,
, 34

. , , ( 15. 16. 2010. ),

,
, , 2010, 71.
35
2006.
2008.
. Ibid

26

34/2009

.35 2009.
, ,
, . , , ,
,
.
, . 455 458 ,
.

IV
2009.
. , , 299
. 4 5 300 . , 2 337 309 3
. ( ),36
.
2009.
.
,
( , ).
.

.
,
36

. ,
2/2009.

27

, - 14 .
, .
2009. . , , ,
.
2006. , .37 ,
.
,
, .
, 2009.
, .

37
2006. ,
,
. . , ,
, . 1011, , 2006, 577.

29

UDK: 340.143(497.11)

. , , , .
31 , , .
. , , , , ,
.
,

,
. , , ,
.
, . ,
. ,

, . ,
, .

, -

30

34/2009

. , , , .

, . .
1. . 1 . 37/10 , .
. . , , . 142 ,
.
,
, ,
,
( ),

, . ,

, . 392. .
, 25. 02. 2010. , . 137/10
22. 01. 2010, 28. 01. 2010. . 2137/2010 12. 02. 2010.
2. . 333 . 5
( . 309)
, , (. 389 . 2). ,
, ,
,
, . , , . 333
. , . 333 ,
.
. 368 . 2. . 333 . 3 4. .

31

1. 1. , .
. 87/10 2. 03. 2010.
, ,
: ,
. 142 , ,

,
,
, .
.
. 31 1, , ...
. 142 . 1 . , ,
, 2. () ,
. ( ) 3.

4.
,
.
,
. 145 .
,
. . ,
. . . 2 , . 1.
. . ,
1

. , . 116 2008.
. , , , 1977. . 391.
3
, , . , op. cit. . 333. , .
4
, ., op. cit. . 391.
2

32

34/2009

,
1. . 142 . . 4 ,
, . , .
( , ). , ,
, . ,
, .
, ( ,
,
), ,
.
- ,
.
. , ., , , . 142 : ,

5
. , ., . 142, . 2, ,

(. 142 . 1).
, .6
,
5

, ., ( 3. IX 2009), , . 2/2009, . 14.

6
, ., , ,
, 2009, . 20.

33

, .
. , ,

, . ,
, . , , .
in dubio pro reo , , ,
. ,
, , ,
. 7 (. 4 . 1. . 6 , 11. 2009)
, 8.
1. ,
,

, . : . 2356/2009. 26. 03. 2010. ,

. 31. . 1. 2. , . (. 6)
: ,
, , , 7
, , . 72. 3. 2009, 11. 2009.
8
, . 9 14
1966 , . 6.
1950. .

34

34/2009

,
9 -
. ,
( y , 1.
1994. , . 31),
,
( , 8. 1995. .
5). ,
( , 24276/94 25.
1998. y 69481/01. 27. 2006. ) . , , , ,
.
( ,
,
), , (. 6 ).
,
. ,
,
(. 6 , 2 ).
, ,

, . (. 7. 2 ).
9

, . 1429/2008 16. 2009.

.

35

,
.
.
2. . 333 ( . 309), (. 389 . 2.),
, ,

.
, . .
375/05, , . ,
. 333 . 5
2006, ( ), . 24 .
6. , . . 43/09
23. 2009. ,
, . ( , . 333 . 5 /06,
. , - ,
. , ,

). ,
,
. , , , .
, .249/08,
27. 2. 2009, . 368 .
2 ,

36

34/2009

. 333 . 5 /06, , , , . . . 2045/09 28. 10. 2009.

, . 333 . 5 , . :
333 . 5. , ( . 309 . 3 4.
) .
,
, ,
,

. , ., .
,
. 394 . 3 /01. , ,
. 17 .

. 368 . 2 . 333 . 3 4
. , , . . 2045/09. 23. 11.
2009, . 333 . 5
.
:

,
, . 333 . 5. /06, . 389 . 2 .
, . 333 . 5 /06
(. 3) , , . 4
5 . . 4 ... 4 , . . 5 , ,
, ,

37

(. 389 . 2) (!).
, , , , .
. 389 . 2 ,
,
.
, 10.
, , , .
. 24 . 6. /06, . 333 . 5. /06. , ,
. , , . . 3228 6. 03. 2008. ,

. , . 333 .
5. /06.
, , , .
,
. , ,
. , ,
11. , ,
. 6. . 3. ) ) 1950. . ,
. 10

, ., , 2009.
, . 466.
11
, ., op. cit. . 208, 209.

38

34/2009

,
,
. , ,
. .12
,
,
. 333 . 5 /06,

, . 389 . 2 /01.

12

, ., ,
, . 309 , .

39

: 347.962.6:341.645.5

:
. , , ,
.
1 2 ,
,
.3 .4 , ,
, , .5 , -
, ,
.6
1
-96-21 . 1992. . .
2
16.
11. 1998. . .
3
Adolphus Karibi-Whyte ( -) .
4
620. 10. 2. 2001.
David Hunt ( ) .
5
Ibid, 624. Landzos Supplementary Brief, p. 3.
, .
6
Ibid.

40

34/2009

. ,

, .
- .
-,
. ,

,
. , ,
.

.
- . - ,
.7
, ,
- . ,
, ,

.
8. ,
, , .9
,
,
10

.
7
, 628. (Jan) .
8
, 629.
9
Ibid.
10
Bundesgerichtshof, 23. 11. 1951, Vol. 2, p. 14.

41

11.
, ,
, , ,
. ,
,
.12

.
.
,
- : . ,
, , ,
. , , .
, ,
.
,
, , . , ,
,
.13
,
.
11

, ozlowski v. City of Chicago, State of Ohio v. Dean, Javor v. United States of America, .
12

(Bundesgerichtshof), 22. 11. 1957. .
13
, 635.

42

34/2009

, , .
,
. , . ,

.
, , , .14 ,
, ,

15.
, , ,
, . . , ,
. ,
. ,
, , , ,
. ,
, , . ,
, , .

16.
, ,
, 14

630. . waiver, . , .
15
, 641.
16
, , .

43

. 13 .17

.18
. ,
,
. , , .
, : ,
. . , , 19 ,
, , .20
.
.21 , , ,
,
.
.
, ,
.
17

Ibid, 620650. 214226.

. Cynthia McMurrey . , , Sinatra
,
G. K. McDonald, Houston cronicle 1997. (: Bob Tutt). - Peter Murphy, . , ,
, .
19
-98-30/1, . .
20
. , 2. 11. 2001. ., 631. 632.
18

44

34/2009

, .
,
, ,
. , . , ,
, . , .

Summary
TRIBUNAL IN THE HAGUE: SLEEPING OF THE PRESIDING JUDGE
A lot of interesting decisions exist in abundant practice of the Tribunal in the Hague.
In this turn the author chose a part of Appeals Chamber Judgement in elebii case delivered on 10 February 2001. One of the Defence raised the argument in its appeal brief that the
presiding judge very often had been slept during the trial. It was really astonishing how seriously and meticulously the Appeals Chamber took it into consideration. The Chamber devoted 13 pages, and more than thirty paragraphs to that argument in the Judgement. Finally,
it has established that presiding judge really slept for some portions during the trial but, under all circumstances, this did not caused any prejudice or harm for defendants. So, the argument was dismissed. The point of the Judgement and of the article is attention that all
participants, especially judges are due to devote to the case during the trial.

21
. ( , , ) .
, . , , ,
. (. 221.)
.
.

45

: 343.852(497.11)

.
-

I

. 511 ( : ).1 ,
- . , . 1 . 511 - , . 2
, , .2

, , , . ,
, ,
, , .
1
, . 70/2001, 68/2002, , . 58/2004, 85/2005, 115/2005, 49/2007, 20/2009, 72/2009.
2
, . 2 . 511 - . 83 . 6
84 . 5 ,
,
-.

46

34/2009

II
3 ( : ) -
(. 83) (. 84 ). ,
, . 83
84
, . 83 ,
. 84 . , : 1)
, ; 2) ; 3)
(. 83 . 1 . 84 . 1 )

,
. . 80 . 4
, ,
.4
. , ,
(. 83 . 2 . 84 . 2 ),
.
, ,
3
, . 85/2005, 88/2005, 107/2005, 72/2009
111/2009.
4
(. ) . 65
. ,
.
-534/02 17. 06. 2003. . ,
. 65 ,
. . .: , ., , ,
. 3/2009, . 3/2009, . 384.

47

, ,
(. 83
. 5 . 84 . 4 ),

.
, . 83 . 84 . 39 . 1
2 . 40 5 ( : )
( ) , (. 39 . 1 2 . 40 ). ,
,
.
. 83 84
, ,
. , , ,
, .
,
(. 83 . 2 3).
, , ,
(. 84 . 2). , ,
(. 83 .
5),
(. 84 . 4).

III
1. . 1 . 511 -
,
,
.
explicite .

5

, . 85/2005.

48

34/2009

, ,
, . , , , .

.
. 83 . 84 - , XXX
, , . - ,
, , ,
,
, .6 ,
.7
,
. , . 511 - : 1) . 83
84 (. 1) 2) , ,
(. 2).
/, XXX
-. , . ,
. 1 . 511 ,
, ,
.8
6
, ., ,
, , , 2004, . 247. : , ., , , , 2006, . 207.
7
, ., , , , , 2004, . 26.
8
- . 511 . 1 - . , . . 356 . 1 . 5 -

49

, . 1 . 511 -,
, - .
. 2 . 511 -
, . . ,
, , ,9
10
.11 . 83 84 ,
, - .12
2. (. )
,13 ; . 361 . 5 .
9

. .: , ., -, .,
, ., , , , , 1987, . 59.
10
, . .
11
. 81 82 , . , . 512 -
, . ,

.
12
-
( ) .
. 83 84 , .
81 82 ,
. 512 -. ,
,
, , !
13
, ., , .., . 260.

50

34/2009

.14 , ,
( , , ).
. 83 . 84 . , /
, ,

.
, : /
, , () , ?
. , , ,
.15
,
. 65 . -75/95
:
, ,
496 16 65
, 53 1 ,
, -

14

, ., -, ., , ., ,
op. cit., . 333.
15
, ., , , 1972, . 119. 1953. .
16
- 1976. .

51

. ,
.17
.18 , .
,
, . .19
,
.
,

. 83 84 ?! , , (
) .
, , (. 505 ). ,

, . ,
. , . 83 .
1 . 84 . 1 ,
. , .
3. ,
. . 511 . 1

.
17

: Infotek (wb).
18
, , . 1066/92 11. 06. 1992. :
Intermex.
19
, ., , op. cit., . 66.

52

34/2009

-, ,
, ( . 1767/71 23. 07. 1971. ),20 (
02. 07. 1979. ).21 ,
.22
,
, , . ,
. .
, .

...
, .23
, () ,
, -,
.24
,25
.26
20
, ., , .,
, , , ,
, , 2002, . 286.
21
, ., , ., , , , 2005, . 377.
22
. -1482/06 27. 03. 2007, -549/07 24. 10. 2007. . 2903/07 21. 01. 2008. (
).
. , , .
23
, ., , , , 2003, . 296.
24
, ., : , , , 1989, . 110.
25
, , () .
26
() . .: , ., , ., , ., -

53

,
. 83
84 .
: a)
.
, , .
.27 , (
/ ). .28

. ) / tempore criminis
, , ,
, . ,
. , ( ). ,
, .29

, .30 , ,

,
, , . . ) / . . ( ,
, ., ,
, Expertus Forensis, . 3/2004, . 310. . .: , ., , : ,
, Intermex, /, 2008, . 197201.
27
: , ., , op. cit., . 176.
28
Ibid.
29
, ., , op. cit., . 299-300.
30
Ibid., . 300.

54

34/2009

).31
. , ,
.32 ,
, , , , ,

. ) / tempore criminis (, ). ,
tempore criminis,33
. 34 .
130 .35 , , , , ,
.36 ) (. 511 . 1 ).
.37

,
/. ,
31

: , ., , , 2000, . 176.
, .
. .
. .: , ., , , .1-2/98, . 20.
33
, ., , op. cit., . 176.
34

. , , , .
.: , ., , , . 2/85, . 6-8.
35
. 1 : , , .
36
,
,
, ,
(. 130 . 2 ).
37
, ., , , 1977, . 208.
32

55

, -590/07 27. 11. 2007. , :

,
,
.
, , , ?!
,
(iura novit curiae). ,
, ,
.
,
( )
/. .
,
. , .38
, , .39 , ,
, , .40
38

. , -479/06 07. 02. 2007,

: , ...
, ; , -2275/07 12. 09. 2008,
: , ,
.... ( )
39
, ., -, ., , ., ,
op. cit. . 333.
40
., , , ,
2002, . 158. .: , ., -

56

34/2009

.
,41 . , ,
, ., ( , , , .)
.
4. . 83 84
. , (.
459460 ), (
) (. 39, 40, 41 78 ).

: ) .
.
/ .42
. 83 . 84 , ,
, , .

.43 , ,

, , . 1-2/2008, . 618.
41
: ., , op. cit., . 158.
42
, I 1511/06 05.10.2006.
: , , . :
Intermex.
43
, 20. 04. 1982. . :

57

. , ()
.44 ) . ,
.45 , .
,
.46
(/ )
( . 83) ( . 84).
) ,
, ,
,
. 65 ,
. : Intermex.
44
, -67/07
19.12.2007. -81/07 , (
) . 83 , . .: , .,
, op. cit., . 388. ,
. 83 , .
45
. , I 2043/08 23. 09. 2008.
-32/08 ( ).
46
-795/06 22. 05. 2007.
. 83
. I 1573/07 04. 09. 2007.
, , ,
. 83 ,
( -

58

34/2009

. , .47
/
(. 361 . 8 ). ,
, (. 368 . 1 . 8 ). ,

. 83
.48 -, ,
ex officio (. 380 . 1 . 1 )
(.
389 ).49

).
47
. -84/06 24. 11. 2006,
. 65 . ,
,
I 2579/06 21. 02. 2007. ,
. 65 ( ).
48
. , -84/06 24. 11. 2006.,
-32/08 26. 05. 208. -36/ 08 08. 07. 2008. ( ).
49
I 2579/06 21. 02. 2007. ( -84/06 . 48)
: ,
368 . 1 . 11 ...
. 65 . , ,
( ), , . ,
( . 83 ),
( : ). ,

59

IV
. 83 84 .
,
. ,
, ,
, . ,
.
- ,
,
(. 327 -), (. 361 . 4 . 356
-), (. 361
. 8 -) .,
, . 83 84 ,
(. 511 . 1 -).

PROCEDURE OF PRONOUNCING SECURITy MEASURES OF COMPULSORy DRUG

ADDICTION TREATMENT AND COMPULSORy ALCOHOL ADDICTIO TREATMENT
Summary
This text is about procedure of pronouncing security measures of compulsory drug addiction
treatment from art. 83. and compulsory alcohol addiction treatment from art. 84. of Criminal Code of Republic Serbia. This procedure is incorporated in basic criminal law procedure
and its major characteristic in light of art. 511. of Criminal Procedure Code is psyhiatric expertise. But, legal regulations of quoted procedure are nt comprehensive. Due to that reason, we can find mny different problems in the practice regarding this procedure.

61

UDK: 343.63(497.11)

,


() .
1 , , , 19. .
.
( )
1860 .
. () 210 . . 211 ,
,
.
. 171 . 1 , ,
, . 92 . 4 ( 2005)
,
, , .
1

: , , 1927, . 119 ( : , , , 1933, . 112 113).

62

34/2009

(
, , , ).
, ,
.
, ,
,
( ),
,
, .
,
.
, . ,
, , , .
,
( ) . ,
, , ,
, . , ,
, ,

.
. .
() , , ,
, . , , -.
.
, . , .

. .

63

, , .
.
, , ,
. ,
2.

, , .
, ,
( , , ).
, ,
. ,
, :
, .
, , .
, , , .
, , .
, .

.
; .
.
, ,
, .
, - , , ,
. -, , . , . ,
,
( 50 ) , ,
, .
2

. : Ibidem, . 34.

64

34/2009

,
,
, . , , 3.

, , .
, , , .
.
-1292 / 78 22. 3.
1979 ( 2489
/ 79 4. 6. 1980) , , , ,
, , ,
.
( , , , ).

. 4 ( ) .
. .
5 :
( )
(), ( , ), ( , )
( )
3

: , , 1978.
. -. : , II , II , 1936, . 67.
5
. : Ibidem, . 43 44
4

65

: ( , ,
, A ), ( ), (
).
, . 6 :
. ( )
( , )
, .
(, , , , )7.
8 , , ; , , ,
,
.
, .

,
,
, . , ( ), , , . ,
( , . , , . ), , , (,
.), .
, ,
. , , , . 9,
,
.
6

: ( ), , . 304.
. : ( ), , . 263. . :
( ), 1985, . 235; . -. :
( ) , . 138; . . :
( ) , . 184; . : (II ), , . 156157.
8
. : , , , ,
. 68.
9
: Ibidem, . 44.
7

66

34/2009

10 , , .
, , ( ,
, , ,
. ).
11 , .
, ,
. , .
, , () . ,

. . 12 , , ( , , ,
) . . , ,
, . ,
. ( , , ).
, 13 (, , .) (
) .
14
, - .
( , ).

10

: Ibidem, . 263
: Ibidem, . 156
12
: Ibidem, . 73
13
: Ibidem, 235
14
: Ibidem, . 43
11

67

,
, ( ) . , , ,
. 15
() .
, X
, . ,
,
. , ,
, , ( )
. , , ,
.

. , , , ,
, , . . .
, ( ) , , ,
, ,
( ). , ,
.
, . , , , .

, ,
15
16

: Ibidem, . 74.
: Ibidem, . 69.

68

34/2009

, 16. ()
, , . , , ,
, . , , , ( ).
, , ,
, . .

, ,
:
1.
2.
3. ( )

.
,
, , .
( ) ,
, ,
. , ( ). , , , ,
, , , ,
. .
, ,
, , .

. , ,
, , ( -

69

, ).
, ,
.
, , , ,
, . , , ,
,
.
, , , .
, (), ( , , , , , .),
, , ,
, ,
, 17. ,
. .
, , , , ( ). , . ,
, ,
, , . ,

.

, ,
, .
,
, . ,
, . 17

: Ibidem, . 72.

70

34/2009

.
( )

.
( )
, ,
, .
, .
. . ,
, .
,
. ( )
, , , ,
.
, ,
. , ,
,
.
, ,
,
, , , .18
, , ,
.
.
. 92 . 2 , ,
, : -, 18

. : , . 10
( ), , . 85.

71

,
, ,
, , ,
, , , , .
, ... 19. , , ,
.
. , , ,

.
, ,
, , ,
.

,
,
, , , , .
, (.
, ),
, .

( ),
19

623 / 94 25. 11. 1994;

-650 / 95 10. 5. 1995.

72

34/2009

, .
, , ,
, , .
.
, , , ,
( . ).
, .
, ,
, (
-),
,
.

, ,
:
1. , ,
. ,
( ),
.
,
20.
2. . ,
, ,
(
), 20
21

. .: Ibidem, . 67.
: Ibidem, . 254.

73

21.
3. ,
, (, ) , ( ),
,
22.
4. , . , ,
in dubio pro reo .
,
, .
, ,
, ( ).
, , , , . (
).
. 18 ,
, . (. 3. . 18
).

22

: Ibidem, . 77.

75

UDK: 342.726:343.261-052(497.11)

.
(, , ) ,
: (. 23).
, 1 ,
(. . 128 2 ) (. . 70 I 2005).
25 .
2005. 2 12500 (. 70). 3 14600 (. 128).
.
1

. 10 .
7/1971; . 3 ( : /, 4. 5. 2006. 62393/00, . 55;
/, 19. 6. 2007. 12066/02, . 70); ()
: . 20
(1955/1957); . 25 (1987); . 22 (2006).
2
. 85/2005 ( , ).
3

. 85/2005.

76

34/2009

1948.
(. 37)4, - (. 2023)5
(. 1922)6,
, - () 1951. (. 37)7,
- (. 2933)8 - (. 2629)9
.
16. 1929. ( 39) .
() .
/ ( 39 III
1929).
( 39 I)
( 39 III),
.
(. 37 III 1948; . 37 III 1951),

10 , ,
4

. 92/1948.
. 10/1950.
6
. 10/1950.
7
. 47/1951.
8
. 57/1952.
9
. 57/1952.
10
, , , , , ,
(. 23 I - 1950); (. 22 I
, 1950).
( ) .
5

77

. ,
, (. 39 1929).
11

12
. 44
1961. 13
26. 1961. 14,
, , , 2500
(. 39 I), - 3000 (. 88).

- 1961 1968. 15. : -
3000 . - -
1968. 16, 1961. (. 1964): 2500 ,
(. 19
). - 1970. 17, - 1961. (.
1970), :
2500 , 11

. . 22.2 2006. :
.
12
. 20 (1955/1957).
13
. 24/1961 ( : . 9/64 3/1970).
14
. 29/1961.
15
. 15/1968 (. 55 . 83 1964 = . 94 1970).
16
. 1/1969.
17
. 39/70.

78

34/2009

3000 (. 58).
1977. 18, ,
- , 2500, 3000
(. 104), 3500 (. 30). 1960.
(J), - 1984. 19
, : 12500
3000 (. 24), 14600 3500 (. 30).
(12500/14600 ) - 1997.
(. 67, 257 II)20, - 2005. (.
70)21.
. 128 , : . 19 II - 22; . 60 II - 23.
1984.
. () (). ,
; 100
500 ,
,
, (kcal). .
, .
3000 1977.
ca. 12500 (kJ).24
, - (
1984. ) 12500 , ,
18

. 26/1977.
. 50/1984.
20
. 16/1997.
21
. . 4045 - . 27/2006.
22
. 71/2006.
23
. 71/2006.
24
1 kcal ( ) = 1000 cal = 4186, 8 J = 4,1868 kJ.
19

79

12500 . 12500
. , , .
, .
25 -,
,
. , , 25, :

, .
,
26,

(. 70 I ), ( )
(. 178 ) . .

27, 28,
() .29

Thomsa ,
2002. : Eingeschlossen/Ausgeschlossen. Die Ernhrung in Gefngnissen vom 18. bis
20. Jahrhundert, in: Spiekermann (pr.), Ernhrung in Grenzsituationen, 45.

25

. 59 II (2005); . 118 I (2001); . 112 I (2006).

26
. 40 - (2006); . 60 - (2006).
27
. 45 - (2006).
28
. 21 - (2006).
29
V. Starokadomskiy/, 31. 7. 2008. 42239/02 (), . 58.

80

34/2009

.
1961. 2500 .
1984. . ,
.
: ( )

ZUSAMMENFASSUNG
Es entspricht schon einer verfestigten Gewohnheit in Serbien, die Ernhrung in Gefngnissen gesetzlich nher zu bestimmen. Diese wurde ansatzweise schon vor dem Zweiten Weltkrieg gesetzlich geregelt. Die Mahlzeiten mussten nach dem wissenschaftlichem Erkenntiss
und Erfahrung fr die Erhaltung der Gesundheit und der Arbeitskraft eines Durchschnittsarbeiters ausreichen. Unmittelbar nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg wurde die Ernhrung in
Gefgnissen mehr als nationalkonomisches als eizelfallbezogenes rechtliches Problem aufgefasst. Schon in den fnfziger Jahren bemhte sich dann die sozialistische Regierung um
eine moderne Strafrechtspflege. Im Jahr 1961 begegnet man in Jugoslawien zum ersten mal
eine nummerische Bestimmung des Gefngnissernhrungswertes. Dieser Brennwert betrug
2 500 (Gross) Kalorien pro Person, tglich; 3000 seit dem Jahr 1977. Im Jahr 1984 wollte
man die angegebenen Werte in Joule-Einheiten umrechnen. Aufgrund eines trivialen Fehlers
bestimmen seither die Gesetze einen tglichen Minimalbrennwert der Mahlzeiten, der gerade dem Brennwert einer Beere entspricht. Zuletzt findet man einen solchen Fehlwert im Art.
70 des Strafvollzugsgesetzes aus dem Jahr 2005.

81

UDK: 343.222:614.25

)
. , , ,
. .
1999. 44.000 96.000
.
43.000
, 42.000 , - 17.000 .
, .
700
2,8 .1

. , , , ,
. ,
, , .
1

http://www.pravnadatoteka.hr/pdf/aktualno/hrv/20030211/Odgovornost_za_stetu_zbog_gresaka_u_medicini.doc, 10. 11. 2009. god.

82

34/2009

, ,
.
40.000 , 2.500 .2
, () , 1960.
1980. , 108 .3
. ,
20 , .

,
, , ,
. , ,
, , .4
2
Uhlenbruck/Schlund, Laufs/Uhlenbruck: Handbuch des Arztrechts, 3. Auflage,
Mnchen, 2005, , . V., : , , 2008. ., . 214. : .
3
: , , 1986, . 90.
4
, , . .

, ,
. , ,
.

83

, , , ,
, . , , , ,
, , , . ,
. , ,
,
.

,

.

)
(. no fault compensation system)
,
,
,
. , , .5 , , ,
, .
, , .
: (
).
5

: , . 214.

84

34/2009

, ,
. ,

( -),
.

(. no fault compensation system no fault compensation scheme), 1975.
. , , ,
1997. .6 no fault system .
, .
, .
,
, . , . ,
, .7
6

, , (1987), (1988) (1992).

. Matthew Hitzhusen: Is New Zealand
No-Fault Compensation System a Reasonable Alternative to the Medical Malpractice Crisis in the
United States, Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 649, Fall 2005, Studdert DM, Thomas EJ, Zbar BIW, et al.: Can the United States afford a no fault system of compensation for medical injury? Law Contemp Probl. 1997; 60:134.
7
Hans-Leo Weyers, Empfiehlt es sich, im Interesse der Patienten und Aerzte ergzenden Regelungen fr das rztliche Vertrags-(Standes) und Haftungsrecht einzufren?, Verhandlungen des zweiundfnfzigsten deutschen Juristentages, Band I (Gutahten),Teil A, Mnchen,

85

. , ,
(6070%).8

) no fault
,
,
.
,
no fault .
, no fault , : ) ; )
, )
.9
, .
, . ,
.
.
() . .
: ? , , .

1978, A 74, :
, , 2007, . 113. : .
8
Ibid, . 115
9
Bernhard Grewin: The patient insurance system in Sweden, EFMA, Oslo, 1213 March
2005, http://cpme.dyndns.org:591/database/Speech%20Grewin%20EFMA.pdf,
28. 12. 2009. .

86

34/2009

, . ,

.10 ,
.11
. , .

.
.
,

, ,
, ,
, . , ,

,
, ,
.12

no fault ,
.
10

.
11
David E. Seubert, MD, JD, and by Laurie T. Cohen, JD, and Jason M. LaFlam,
JD: Is No-Fault the Cure for the Medical Liability Crisis? Two points of view on whether a nofault system will ameliorate the medical liability crisis in the U.S., Response 1 by David E. Seubert, MD, JD, Virtual Mentor, Volume 9, pril 2007, Number 4: 315321.
12
, : , , 2006, . 186.

87

, ,
.

) no fault
, ,
, , .13 no fault
,
( , , 14). ,
,
. , , ()
, .15 , ,
,
.
,
13

, no fault . : P. C. Weiler, H. H. Hiatt, J. P. Newhouse, W. G. Johnson,
T. A. Brennan, L. L. Leape et al.: A Measure of Malpractice: Medical Injury, Malpractice Litigation, and Patient Compensation, Harvard University Press, 1993, . 106. :
Harvard University: A Measure of Malpractice.
14

,
, . .
15

, . . 194 . 2.

88

34/2009

. no fault 16,
,
. ,

.

,

(. ).17
,
no fault . , ,
. , ,
, . , ,
.

,


. , , ,
. ,
no fault , , .
16

, 25 , 5 . : :
, . 115. ( 1:10), .
17
Harvard University: A Measure of Malpractice, . 106.

89

18
.
,
. no fault .19
, . ,

. , ,

.
, ,
, .20 no fault
.
no fault ,
. ,
. ,
18
Giovanni Comand: Existing challenges in medical liability: fault, no-fault and strict liability: some pros and some cons, Le dfi toujours plus grand de la responasbilit mdicale:
rponses nationales et europennes, Conference, Strasbourg, 23 June, 2008, . 146.
19
Ibid.
20

. ,

, . ,

75.000,00 . 105.000,00 - ,
, . , ,
.

90

34/2009

, .
. , .
. , ,
.21
. , .
.
, .
no fault
.
,22

.

,
. , .

1979. je
no fault . ()
,
.23
21
Thomas Dhouglas: Medical Injury Compensation: Beyond No-fault, Medical
Law Review, 17, Spring 2009, . 3051.
22
no fault
. . 6.
23
Marc Stauch, Kay Wheat, John Tingle: Sourcebook on

91

.

. , ,
, .

. ,
, . , . ,
,
. ,
.
,
,
. no fault ,
, .

.24 ,
, , .
. no fault
,
25 , ,
Medical Law, The Nottingham Trent University, London-Sydney, 2007, . 595597. Jean
McHale, Marie Fox, Michael Gunn, Stephen Wilkinson: Health Care Law: Text and Materials,
London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2007, . 221224.
24
, -
, ,
, , ( ,
) .
25
. Comit Permanent des Mdicins Europens (CPME), http://www.cpme.be/index.php

92

34/2009

. 2005.
no fault .26
.
.

.
, , .

.
, no fault (. Clinical Risk Management).27
,
. , .

, . ,
,
.
26

., : ,
?, , 31/2004, : ,
: op. cit., . 186.
27
Ibid.

93

no fault ,
.

.
,
. ,
, .
,
, . , no fault
,
, .

, .
. , ,
.
, ,
,
no fault .

, no fault . ,
, . . No fault
-

94

34/2009

. No fault , ,
, , . no fault


.
ABSTRACT
No fault compensation scheme is a patient insurance system which has succesfully implemented in scandinavian countries for the last decades. The healthcare providers are liable to
compensate patients for injuries caused to them, in relation to diagnostic and/or therapeutic interventions, and it is unnecessary to pleading a fault of physician. No fault system is based on the ascertainment of causation between the injury and the medical treatment.
Compensations are available for the patients when health harm is caused by accident or misadventure during the medication. No fault model provides cooperation between patients
and physician and it is a good evidence of the potential wrong medical practice. Compares it
with a traditionally tort or fault system, it is more financially sustainable, more efficiency system with quick payouts and funds are redirected from litigation in the best interest of the harmed patient. As we can see, no fault compensation system is the subject of extensive
discussion in sciences and professional field and therefor, it is not difficult to anticipate its
bright future in further regulation of health care policy.

95

UDK: 341.93(497.11)

JE

1.
1.1. , j
. .
. a .
, XVII , , .
. , , ,
. , ,
. comitas gentium. comity , .
e e .
. ,
1.
1

: , , 1950, . 119. : , , 1976, . 11.

96

34/2009

1.2. , , , , .

. , .
, , , .
1.3. ,
, ,
.

2. 2 ( 1929. )
2.1. 13. 1929.
3. , .
367. 367.
, , , , .
367. : , , ,
.
,
; ,
( . .).
2.2. iura novit curia.
. ,
2
.
, , ,
. .
3
: ( ) 1. 1895. , 111,
( ) 1.
1895. 113.

97

, .
, ,
367, .
367.
,
. , . , , iura novit curia.
. 1. ( )
. , , 4. ,
5.
2.3. 367.
.
367,
, .
, ,
,
.
, . 367.
. . . ,
,
.

: , , ,
1933, . 107.
5
9. 1923. , I 665/23, . .
. V 225,
.
,
. : , , . 107.

98

34/2009

3. ()6
( 23. 2005. )
3.1.
222. , .
222. :

.


( . .).
3.2. iura novit curia. , , 367. . ,
. ,

.
. 2. 222.
.

, .
.
222,
219. 220. (
), 186. ( ),
7. ( ).
6

. 4/77, 36/77, 6/80, 36/80, 43/82, 72/82, 69/82, 58/84,

74/87, 57/89, 20/90, 27/90 35/91, . 27/92, 31/93, 24/94, 12/98,
15/98 3/02. 1. 1977. . 23. 2005. , , . 125, 22. 2004. .
, . 4/57, 52/61, . 12/65, 1/71, 23/72,
6/74.

99

3.3. 7. 1.
.
2. , ( . .).
o 2,
, , . iura novit curia.
7. . 1. 2. . 2. ,
.
3.4. ,
219. -, ( . .).
222,
, , 219.
.

7.
220. 1. ( . .).
.
3.5. 219. 186. 1. 3.
186. 1:
, , ,
( 106)8.
7
7. 4:
( 3. 3).
8
106: , , , ().

100

34/2009

186. 3: , ,
( . .).
. , ( , )
, . , 186. 1.
.
186. 3,
. ,
(,
1. 186). , , . , 297. 4,
, : .
, . ,
, .
, , . 186. 3.
3.6. . , .
,
, .

. : , , , ,
, , .
, , ( . .).
, ,
.

101

4. ()9
( 23. 2005. )
4.1. 1. 2. 7, , -10.
4.2. , -.
1. 187. 1. 186. -.
.
4. 187. 3. 186.
-. ,
, . 298.
4.
, 297. 4. -. 4. 187.
3. 186. -, 4.
298. 4. 4. 297. -, (
),
.
, 187. 4.
, 284, 2.
, ( . .).
220.11 22112, ,
219. 220. -.
4.3. 223. .
223. 2: ,
,
.
9
. 125, 22. 2004. . 23. 2005. .
10
7, 1. 2: .
.
11
220: .
12
221: .
.

102

34/2009

223. 3: , ,
( . .).
, -, . - .
4.4. , . 22213, .
. ,
. . , ,
iura novit curia.
iura novit curia, ,
, .
,
14.

. , ,
. ,
222. -.
4.5. ,
. . .
. o 15. , 18.
13
222:
.

.
14
: , , 1980, . 139140.
15
, 7. 1968. . . . 7/91.

103

1. K ,
.
1.
, ,
- - , . , 2.
, .
.

5.
- 7, , , , .
- .
, iura novit curia, .
,

. , .
, , 16.
, ,
.

, .
, ,
16
: , , 1995, . 206. : , . 385. : , , 1971, . 397. (Zuglia): , ,
1957, . 320.

104

34/2009

. , ,
. , .
. ,
.
iura novit curia, .

, .
, . . , .

Summary
In case the domestic court applies a foreign law grounded on collision norms, the question
arises whether the foreign law is a right or a fact.
Pursuant to the provision of the Litigation Procedure Law, the parties are obliged to provide facts upon which they base their request or derogate the request of the opposite party
and suggest proofs by which the facts are determined. The parties may, but they are not obliged to, provide a legal ground as well. However the court is not bound by the said legal ground.
None of the Litigation Procedure Law provisions relates to the obligation of the parties to
provide the contents of the foreign law which is to be applied to the court. Therefore, there
is no basis according to which the court could ask for information about the foreign law. It
is obvious that the principle iura novit curia, is the starting principle and the difference is not
made between the domestic and the foreign law.
Contents of the legal form on basis of which the court makes decision related to the soundness of the claim, can not be the subject of proof without taking into account whether the domestic or foreign law is in question. Facts are proved and the law is determined according to
the official procedure. There is no difference whether the domestic or foreign law is in question. Therefore, the conclusion is that when the domestic court applies foreign law grounded on the collision norm, the foreign law is a law, not a fact.

105

. .
a

(. . . 111/09 29. 12. 2009. .)

. , .

,
, 38 . 2,
100.000 .
, ,
, . -

106

34/2009

500.000 ( 100.000
), , ,
55 . 1 . 2
,
.

( ),
500 000 394 . 2 3 -.
, ,
,
.
( , , )
-, .
, , (facta pendentia)?
, , . , ,
, . ,
( , , ), , ,
, .*
, , 2 . 1 -, , .

() , .
, .
* ,
, , , , ,
.

107

(fakta pendentia),
,
(. . 111/09
29. 12. 2009. .).
, , , ,
, . . * .
,
, , , **.
, , ,
500.000 ( 100.000 )
, ,
, , , ,
-, ,
100.000 .
, , ,
. 2 -,
-, ( )
( ), , 500.000 , ,
.
.

,
, . ,
* .
, 1987. . , , . 157.
** . 159.

108

34/2009

, . (
).
,
, ( . .) , .
( . .) , *
, , , : ( )
, ,
( ).
.

* , . 159 160.

109

, ,
, , .
, .
,
(EC) No. 261/2004 .
261/2004
. (1) (2) .
(261/2004/EC)
17. 02. 2005. , .
- .

( 4)
.
,
. , -

110

34/2009

, .
,
.
( 7) 250 1500
, 600 3500 .
50%
,

, . 2 1.500
, 4 3.500 .
, ,
:
) ,
,
.
.
) , , ( 8).
, () , , e-mail-
( 9).

( 5)
15. 22. 2010.
.
, . ,
( 9)
, :
() ;

111

;
;
, , --.

( 250 1500
, 600 3500 )
. ,
:

:
,
, .
k r
261/2004
, , . , ,
. ,
,
,
.

( 5 /3/)

7, ,
.
,
/ ( 9).
, ,
Siim Kallas,
, -

112

34/2009

( 8) ( 9)
.

( 6)

7. , , , , ,
,
1500
;

1500 1500 3500
;

- 9.
, (ECJ)
Sturgeon & Condor/Bock v Air France 19. 2009. 261. 250 600
. (ECJ)
261. ,
.


.
,
. ,

.

113

.
, ,
.
. ,
, .
.
, ,
.
, , , , ,
. ,
, , : .
, . , , , ,

114

34/2009

.

.
, ,
.

. ,
, .
, , ,
, .

:
,
, , .
, ,
,
.
, 27. 2010.

115

,
2010. je
.
. , 500 , 31
. . ,
. , ,
, .
. , , , .
, , , . ,
. , , . ,
,
, ,
, . ,
, .
.
, , , . . . .
, , , .
, ,

116

34/2009

, , ,
, .
, . ,
, , 2010, , . ,
, , .
,
, .
,

117

IN memoRIAm

(19472010)
- (19472010)
(1970) , . . . (19032002) .
.
* , , , Granexport.
,
, .
,
, , , ,
, .
, , , , .
.
, ,
,
.
,
, , .
* : , ; ,
, 1973.
1975. , 1970.
1974. .

118

34/2009

, . , ,
. , ,
,
.
.
. , , , , ,
. , ,
,
. , , .
, , . , , ,
,
. , ,
,
, ,
.

. , :
, : . , ,
, : .
,
, , . , , ,
1984. .
, , .

In memoriam

119

. (19352010)
14. 2010. ,
.
5. 1935. .
1954. ,
1959. .
, .
1963. ,
, . 1965.
,
. 1973. , .
1976. .
1976. ,

, . 1995. , & ,
2001.
, , & .
, 2010. , .
, ,
50 .
, , .

, - , , ,
,
.

120

34/2009

30 .
, , , .
,
, ,
, .
,
, , .
,
, , .
-, .
.
.
.
.