Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

In her novel The New American Dreamers, Ruth Sidel asserts the validity of the American

Dream, or materialistic success determined by independence and effort, as well as the societal
progression of women following feministic revolutions of the 1960s; ultimately, Sidel concludes
that women are morally, intellectually, and naturally capable of achieving the American Dream.
The author provides anecdotal evidence, detailing the aspirations of socio-economically and
ethnically diverse females, as well as generalizations in regards to the independence of women;
Sidel emphasizes the potential of upcoming generations to foreshadow a society of affluent,
unlimited females, thus simulating a liberating and limitless future of equality. The author
affirms both the American Dream and its accessibility in order to juxtapose the suppressive
paradigm of society to the authoritative, unhampered desires of young women. Her empowering,
unfaltering tone, stimulated by invigorating pathos, invites or provokes disciplined females while
degrading a hypocritical, prejudiced society.

The interviewed females willingly detailed their lofty aspirations, but provided no plan or
courses of action to obtain the American Dream. While prejudice does hamper working
conditions for women, apathy within a submissive generation results in the accumulation of
lackadaisical ambition. The American Dream has degraded because of diminished effort on
behalf of the populace; Americans are merely dreamers overwhelmingly obsessed with the
abstract and confounded by the concrete or parameters of success. This societal digression is
evident in other aspects of the Dream portrayed in Sidels novel; marriage is presented as a
binding contract necessary for financial stability, and has deleteriously evolved from biblical
principles of love and devotion. Females mentioned in the novel acknowledge husbands as a
synthetic necessity, to provide a semblance of completion in regards to the American Dream.
Society has also harbored a mechanistic drive for the materialistic; the former Dream elevated
the individual and emphasized potential and self-worth, whereas the interviewed women strived
for an elegant house and flashy vehicles. However, despite the degradation and notable
inaccessibility of the Dream, it is necessary within modern culture. The American Dream
stimulates hope, a tangible recognition of abstract sentiments for the impossible. Without the
potential of the American Dream, I would not strive to be Madam Secretary; but does the
impossibility of the Dream create an apathetic populace, or is true effort justly rewarded by the
semblance of success?

You might also like