Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SPC in Pharmaceutical Industry One Day 93-01-26 PDF
SPC in Pharmaceutical Industry One Day 93-01-26 PDF
in Pharmaceutical Industry
inPharmaceuticalIndustry
OperationsManagement
Amir Mehdizadeh, Ph.D.
AmirMehdizadeh,Ph.D.
a_mehdizadeh@yahoo.com
www.ofoghpharmed.com
April 15, 2014
L
LearningObjectives
i Obj ti
SPC
.
Causesofvariation
7 SPC
Controlcharts
xbar,R,p,andccharts
IshikawaDiagram Causeandeffectdiagrams
Processcapability Processcapabilityindex
Concept sixsigma
Conceptsix
sigma
2
SPC
-1
-2
Processcapabilityindex
-3 Process
capabilityindex
Tappeddensity
Tapped density
-4
-5
Processcapabilityindex
-6 CpK
3
SPC
PQR
QRM
cGMPFDA
PIC/S
/
cGMPFDA
(b)Validinprocessspecificationsforsuchcharacteristicsshallbeconsistent
(b)
Valid in process specifications for such characteristics shall be consistent
withdrugproductfinalspecificationsandshallbederivedfromprevious
acceptableprocessaverage andprocessvariabilityestimates wherepossible
anddeterminedbytheapplicationofsuitablestatisticalprocedures
dd
db h
l
f
bl
l
d
where
h
appropriate.Examinationandtestingofsamplesshallassurethatthedrug
productandinprocessmaterialconformtospecifications.
April 15, 2014
AnIntroductiontoSPCandSixSigma
g
Wedontknowwhatwedontknow.
Wecantactonwhatwedontknow.
Wewontknowuntilwesearch.
We wonttsearchforwhatwedon
Wewon
search for what we donttquestion.
question.
Wedontquestionwhatwedontmeasure.
Hence,wejustdontknow.
Dr Mikel Harry
Dr.Mikel
April 15, 2014
THE BIGGEST ISSUE
THEBIGGESTISSUE
'lean manufacturing' methods
'leanmanufacturing'methods
AstraZenecawasoneofthefirstpharmaceuticalcompaniesintheworld
f h f
h
l
h
ld
toadoptToyota's 'leanmanufacturing'methods.
in Pharmatechnologist.comvisitedthefirm
com visited the firm'ssplantinSdertlje
plant in Sdertlje tofind
to find
inPharmatechnologist
outwhatimpactthiswayofworkingishavingonproductivity
6Sigma
improvements
Lean
improvements
2013 10
Top 10 Best Pharmaceutical Companies In 2013
Top10BestPharmaceuticalCompaniesIn2013
1.Johnson&Johnson
h
h
UnitedStates
d
2.Pfizer UnitedStates
3.Roche
h Switzerland
i
l d
4.GlaxoSmithKline UnitedKingdom
5.Novartis
i Switzerland
S i
l d
6.Sanofi France
7.AstraZeneca
7 A
Z
U i d Ki d
UnitedKingdom
8.AbbottLaboratories UnitedStates
9.Merck&Co
9 M k & C UnitedStates
U i dS
10.BayerHealthCare Germany
April 15, 2014
Guinness
Brewery
1900
Ford
Assembly
Line
Line
Shewhart
Introduces
SPC
1930
Gilbreth,Inc.
Management
Theory
Industrial
Engineering
Statistical Process Control, SPC
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Deming
D
i
14Points
7DeadlyDiseases
1950
ToyotaProduction
System
10
StatisticalQualityControl,SQC
Q
y
, Q
StatisticalProcessControl,SPC
1930
SPC,StatisticalProcessControl,isaprocessthatwasdesigned inthe
1930stocharacterizechangesandvariation inprocessfromastandard.
SPC
.
Itcanbeusedforboth
attributes and
variables
April 15, 2014
11
S
SourcesofVariation
f V i ti
Variation existsinallprocesses.
Variation canbecategorizedaseither:
Natural,CommonorRandomcauses ofvariation,or
Randomcausesthatwecannotidentify
Unavoidable,e.g.slightdifferencesinprocessvariableslike
Unavoidable e g slight differences in process variables like
voltage,qualityofmachine,servicetime,temperature
SpecialorAssignablecauses ofvariation
Causescanbeidentifiedandeliminated:pooremployeetraining,
,
g p
worntool,machineneedingrepair
April 15, 2014
12
Understanding Variability
UnderstandingVariability
Variationexistsineverything.Eventhebestmachine
cannotmakeeveryunitexactlythesame.
Improvedcapability,becomesanecessity,duetothe
needof:
improveddesigns
lowercosts
betterperformance
Allofthisleadstotheneedoftightertolerances
g
Thismeansthattheabilitytooperatetoatighttolerance,without
p
producingdefectsbecomesamajoradvantage
g
j
g
April 15, 2014
13
D
DescriptiveStatistics
i ti St ti ti
DescriptiveStatisticsinclude:
l d
n
TheMean
h
measureofcentraltendency
f
l
d
x=
TheRange differencebetween
largest/smallest observations in a set of data
largest/smallestobservationsinasetofdata
x
i =1
StandardDeviationmeasurestheamountof
Deviation measures the amount of
Standard
datadispersionaroundmean
DistributionofDatashape
Normalorbellshapedor
Skewed
(x
n
i=1
n 1
14
Descriptivestatistics
Inferentialstatistics
15
Descriptivestatisticssummarizethepopulationdatabydescribingwhatwas
observedinthesamplenumericallyorgraphically.Numericaldescriptors
includemean andstandarddeviation forcontinuousdata types(likeheights
orweights),whilefrequencyandpercentagearemoreusefulintermsof
describingcategoricaldata (likerace).
Inferentialstatistics usespatternsinthesampledatatodrawinferences
aboutthepopulationrepresented,accountingforrandomness.These
inferencesmaytaketheformof:answeringyes/noquestionsaboutthe
data (hypothesis testing), estimating numerical characteristics of the data
data(hypothesistesting),estimatingnumericalcharacteristicsofthedata
(estimation).Inferencecanextendtoforecasting,prediction andestimation
ofunobservedvalueseitherinorassociatedwiththepopulationbeing
studied; it can include extrapolation andinterpolation.
studied;itcanincludeextrapolation
and interpolation
April 15, 2014
16
Di t ib ti
DistributionofData
fD t
Normaldistributions
ld
b
Skeweddistribution
17
Normal Distribution
NormalDistribution
18
19
AUC=0.135%
AUC=0.135%
20
Understanding Variability
UnderstandingVariability
Variability isinherentineveryprocess,aswellaspharmaceuticalprocesses
:
Natural orcommoncauses,e.g.LODvariationingranulation
:
Specialorassignablecauses,e.g.mistakeintimeandtemperature
settingindryingstep.
SPC
Providesastatisticalsignal
id
i i l i
l whenassignablecauses
h
i
bl
arepresent
Detectandeliminateassignablecausesofvariation
April 15, 2014
21
Natural Variations
NaturalVariations
Naturalvariations intheinherent ofproductionprocess
Thesearetobeexpected
) (
Outputmeasuresfollowanormaldistribution
Output measures follow a normal distribution (bellshape)
(bell shape)
.
Foranydistributionthereisameasureofcentraltendencyanddispersion
22
Assignable Variations
AssignableVariations
.
Variationsthatcanbetracedtoaspecificreason (machinewear,
misadjusted equipment fatigued or untrained workers)
misadjustedequipment,fatiguedoruntrainedworkers)
SPC
TheobjectiveofSPC istodiscover whenassignablecausesarepresent and
eliminatethem
23
Samples
(a) Samplesoftheproduct,sayfiveboxes
of cereal taken off the filling machine
ofcerealtakenoffthefillingmachine
line,vary fromeachotherinweight
F
Frequency
y
Tomeasuretheprocess,wetakesamplesandanalyzethesample
statistics followingthesesteps
Eachofthese
representsone
(
)
-1
sampleoffiveboxes
l f fi b
ofcereal
# #
# # #
# # # #
# # # # # # #
#
# # # # # # # # #
Weight
g
April 15, 2014
24
Samples
-2
Thesolidline
represents the
representsthe
distribution
(b) Afterenoughsamplesare
takenfromastableprocess,
Frequency
theyformapatterncalleda
distribution
Weight
25
Samples
( ) -3
(c) Therearemanytypesofdistributions,includingthenormal(bell
shaped)distribution,butdistributionsdodifferintermsofcentral
Frequency
tendency(mean),standarddeviationorvariance,andshape
Centraltendency
Weight
April 15, 2014
Variation
Weight
Shape
Weight
26
Samples
-4
(d) Ifonlynaturalcauses of
variation arepresent,the
are present the
outputofaprocess formsa
Frequenccy
Prediction
Weight
distribution thatisstableover
that is stable over
timeandispredictable
April 15, 2014
27
Samples
BatchReconciliation
-5
Range
Yield
PQR
?
?? ??
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
??
??
?
present,theprocessoutput
isnotstableovertimeandis
Fre
equency
Prediction
notpredicable
Weight
28
29
-1
1.
FishboneDiagrams
2.
Histograms
3.
ParetoAnalysis
4.
Flowcharts
5
5.
Scatter Plots
ScatterPlots
6.
RunCharts
7.
ControlCharts
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
-7
30
Dr.WalterShewhart
Dr
Walter Shewhart
ControlCharts
31
Types of Data
TypesofData
Variables
Attributes
Defectrelatedcharacteristics
Characteristicsthatcantakeany
real value
realvalue
Maybeinwhole
May
be in whole orinfractional
or in fractional
numbers
Classifyproductsaseithergood
products as either good
Classify
orbad orcountdefects
Continuousrandomvariables
Categorical&discreterandomvariables
Categorical & discrete random variables
32
Q lit
Quality
Quality
l meansfitnessforuse
f
f
qualityofdesign
qualityofconformance
li
f
f
Quality isinverselyproportionaltovariability.
Manufacturingbaseddefinition:Conformancetospecifications
f
i b d d fi i i
C f
ifi i
Theproducthasbothvariablespecifications (measurable)and
attributable specifications (non
attributablespecifications
(nonmeasurable)
measurable)thatmanufacturing
that manufacturing
monitorsandensuresconformance
Productbaseddefinition:quantitiesofproductattributes
Attributesarenonmeasurabletypesofdata
Whatareallthedifferentfeatures
April 15, 2014
33
Control Charts
ControlCharts
.
Constructedfromhistoricaldata,thepurposeofcontrolchartsistohelp
distinguishbetween naturalvariations andvariationsduetoassignable
causes
8 4
. 12kp
Hardnessspecification:48kp
34
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Mean
SD or
Batch 1
200
201
202
198
195
207
204
196
206
203
201.2
4.02
Batch 2
199
201
202
198
200
198
203
197
199
198
199.5
1.95
Batch 3
202
201
200
199
201
199
200
198
201
200
200.1
1.19
210
208
206
204
202
Batch1
200
Batch2
198
Batch3
196
9
194
192
190
0
10
12
35
-SPC
SPC M th d D l i C t l Ch t
SPCMethodsDevelopingControlCharts
(
. LCL UCL CL
ControlCharts(QCcharts)showsampledataplottedonagraphwith
Charts (QC charts) show sample data plotted on a graph with
Control
CL,UCL,andLCL.
.
Controlchartforvariables areusedtomonitorcharacteristicsthatcanbe
measured e g hardness weight dissolution yields and friability
measured,e.g.hardness,weight,dissolution,yields,andfriability.
Control
Controlchartsforattributes
charts for attributes areusedtomonitorcharacteristicsthathave
are used to monitor characteristics that have
discretevalues andcanbecounted,e.g.%defectiveinbottlingand
capping,or#ofbadorimperfectinblistering,etc.
April 15, 2014
36
S tti Control
Setting
C t l Limits
Li it
Percentageofvaluesundernormal
f l
d
l
curve
Controllimitsbalanceriskslike
TypeIerror
37
C t l Ch t f V i bl
ControlChartsforVariables
R X
Usexbar andRbar chartstogether
Usedtomonitordifferentvariables
R X
38
C t l Ch t f V i bl
ControlChartsforVariables
( ) X
Usexbar chartstomonitorthechangesinthemeanofaprocess (central
tendencies)
. R
UseRbar chartstomonitorthedispersionorvariability oftheprocess
Systemcanshowacceptablecentraltendenciesbutunacceptablevariability,or
.
Systemcanshowacceptablevariabilitybutunacceptablecentraltendencies
April 15, 2014
39
Constructing an X bar Chart:
ConstructinganXbarChart:
Aqualitycontrolinspectoratthesoftdrinkcompanyhastakenthreesamples
withfourobservationseachofthevolumeofbottlesfilled.Ifthestandard
deviationofthebottlingoperationis0.2ounces,usethebelowdatatodevelop
control charts with limits of 3 standard deviations for 16 oz bottling operation
controlchartswithlimitsof3standarddeviationsfor16oz.bottlingoperation.
Time1
Time2
Time3
Observation1
15.8
16.1
16.0
Observation2
16.0
16.0
15.9
Observation3
15.8
15.8
15.9
Observation4
15.9
15.9
15.8
15.875
15.975
15.9
UCL x = x + z x
0.2
0.3
0.2
LCL x = x z x
Samplemeans(Xbar)
Sampleranges(R)
April 15, 2014
x 1 + x 2 + ... x n
x=
, =
x
k
n
40
Solution and Control Chart (x bar)
SolutionandControlChart(xbar)
Time 1
Time1
Time 2
Time2
Time 3
Time3
Observation1
15.8
16.1
16.0
Observation2
16.0
16.0
15.9
Observation3
15.8
15.8
15.9
Observation4
15.9
15.9
15.8
15 875
15.875
15 975
15.975
15 9
15.9
0.2
0.3
0.2
Centerline(xdoublebar):
l
( d bl b )
15 875 + 15.975
15.875
15 975 + 15.9
15 9
x=
= 15.92
3
Controllimitsfor 3 limits:
Sampleranges(R)
0.2
= 16.22
UCL x = x + z x = 15.92 + 3
4
0.2
= 15.62
LCL x = x z x = 15.92 3
4
April 15, 2014
41
X B C t l Ch t
XBarControlChart
42
Setting Chart Limits
SettingChartLimits
ForxChartswhenweknow
43
C t l Ch t f R
ControlChartforRange(R)
(R)
Factorsforthreesigmacontrollimits
Factors for three sigma control limits
Center Line and Control Limit
formulas:
R=
Sample Size
(n)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
A2
1.88
88
1.02
0.73
0.58
0.48
0.42
0.37
0 34
0.34
0.31
0.29
0 27
0.27
0.25
0.24
0.22
D3
0.00
0
00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.14
0 18
0.18
0.22
0.26
0 28
0.28
0.31
0.33
0.35
D4
3.27
3
2.57
2.28
2.11
2.00
1.92
1.86
1 82
1.82
1.78
1.74
1 72
1.72
1.69
1.67
1.65
44
R
R B C t l Ch t
RBarControlChart
45
A2 Rbar
S
SecondMethodfortheXbarChartUsingRbarandtheA2Factor
d M h d f h X b Ch U i R b
d h A2 F
Usethismethodwhensigma fortheprocessdistributionisnotknow
Controllimitssolution:
R=
UCL x = x + A 2 R = 15.92
15 92 + (0.73
0 73)(0.233)
(0 233) = 16.09
16 09
LCL x = x A 2 R = 15.92 (0.73)(0.233) = 15.75
April 15, 2014
46
C t l Ch t f Att ib t P Ch t & C Ch t
ControlChartsforAttributes:PCharts&CCharts
/
/ :
(
)
Attributesarediscreteevents:yes/noorpass/fail
P
UsePCharts forqualitycharacteristics thatarediscrete andinvolve
yes/noorgood/bad decisions
Numberofleakingtubesinaboxof48
Numberofbrokeneggsinacarton
C
UseCCharts fordiscretedefectswhentherecanbemorethanone
defect per unit
defectperunit
Numberofdefectssuchindistinctiveengraving(batchNo.)andbadblisters
Numberofcomplaintspercustomeratahotel
Number of complaints per customer at a hotel
April 15, 2014
47
Sample
Number
of
D f i
Defective
Tires
Number of
Tires in each
S
Sample
l
Proportion
Defective
20
0.15
20
0.10
20
0.05
20
0.10
20
0.05
T
Total
l
100
0 09
0.09
Solution:
CL = p =
p =
# Defectives
9
=
= 0.09
TotalInspected 100
p(1 p )
=
n
(0.09)(0.91)
= 0.064
20
48
P
P ControlChart
P
C t l Ch t
49
CChartExample:Thenumberofweeklycustomercomplaintsare
monitoredinalargehotelusingacchart.
Develop threesigmacontrollimitsusingthedatatablebelow.
Week
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Total
NumberofComplaints
Number
of Complaints
3
2
3
1
3
3
2
1
3
1
22
S l ti
Solution:
C =C=
CL
# complaints 22
=
= 2.2
22
# of samples 10
UCLc = c + z c = 2.2
2 2 + 3 2.2
2 2 = 6.65
6 65
LCLc = c z c = 2.2 3 2.2 = 2.25 = 0
50
C
C ControlChart
C
C t l Ch t
51
StatisticalProcessControl
ParetoDiagrams
52
Pareto Diagrams
ParetoDiagrams
Vilfredo Pareto
%20 %80 : Italyswealth
80%heldby20%ofpeople;Usedwhenanalyzingattributes
.
Thissamedistributionhasbeenobservedinotherareasandhasbeen
termedtheParetoEffect.
%80 :
.
%20
TheParetoeffect evenoperatesinqualityimprovement:80%of
problemsusuallystemfrom20%ofthecauses.
Statistical Process Control, SPC
Dr. Mehdizadeh
53
Pareto Diagrams
ParetoDiagrams
Paretocharts areusedtodisplaytheParetoprinciple inaction,
.
arrangingdatasothatthefewvitalfactors thatarecausingmostofthe
problemsrevealthemselves.
.
Concentrating improvementeffortsonthesefewwillhaveagreater
impactandbemorecosteffective thanundirectedefforts.
April 15, 2014
54
Pareto Diagrams
ParetoDiagrams
WhatisaParetoChartusedfor?
Todisplay therelativeimportanceofdata
Todirect effortstothebiggestimprovementopportunity by
highlighting thevitalfew.
55
C t ti
ConstructingaParetoChart
P t Ch t
.
Determinethecategories andtheunitsforcomparisonofthedata,such
asnumberorfrequencyyield,weightvariation,cost,ortime.
Total the raw data ineachcategory,thendeterminethegrandtotalby
in each category, then determine the grand total by
Totaltherawdata
addingthetotalsofeachcategory.
.
Reorderthecategories
R
d th
t
i fromlargesttosmallest.
f
l
tt
ll t
)
.(100
Determinethecumulativepercent ofeachcategory(i.e.,thesumof
eachcategoryplusallcategoriesthatprecedeitintherankorder,
dividedbythegrandtotalandmultipliedby100).
April 15, 2014
56
C t ti
ConstructingaParetoChart
P t Ch t
Drawandlabelthelefthandverticalaxis withtheunitofcomparison,such
asfrequency,costortime.
.
Drawandlabelthehorizontalaxiswiththecategories.Listfromlefttoright
i
inrankorder.
k d
.
.
Drawandlabeltherighthandverticalaxis from0to100percent.The100
percentshouldlineupwiththegrandtotalonthelefthandverticalaxis.
Beginningwiththelargestcategory,drawinbarsforeachcategory
representingthetotalforthatcategory.
ep ese t g t e tota o t at catego y
April 15, 2014
57
C t ti
ConstructingaParetoChart
P t Ch t
Drawalinegraph beginningattherighthandcornerofthefirstbar to
representthecumulativepercentforeachcategoryasmeasuredonthe
right hand axis
righthandaxis.
.
Analyzethechart.
. %80 %20
Usuallythetop20%ofthecategorieswillcompriseroughly80%ofthe
cumulativetotal.
April 15, 2014
58
Constructing a Pareto Chart
ConstructingaParetoChart
Letsassumewearelistingalltherejectedproductsthatareremoved
fromacandymanufacturinglineinoneweek
Firstweputtherejectsinspecificcategories
Nowrapper .
Nocenter .
Wrongshape .
Shortcut .
W
Wrapperopen
.
Underweight .
Overweight .
59
Constructing a Pareto Chart
ConstructingaParetoChart
Thenwetallyhowmanyofeachcategorywehave
1.
Nowrapper 10
2.
Nocenter 37
3
3.
Wrongshape
h
53
3
4.
Shortcut 6
5. Wrapperopen 132
6.
Underweight 4
7.
Overweight 17
Getthetotalrejects 259
April 15, 2014
60
Constructing a Pareto Chart
ConstructingaParetoChart
Developapercentageforeachcategory
1.
Nowrapper 10/259=3.9%
/
2.
Nocenter 37/259=14.3%
3
3.
Wrongshape
h
53/259=20.5%
3/2 9 20 %
4.
Shortshot 6/259=2.3%
5
5.
W
Wrapperopen
132/259=51%
132/259 51%
6.
Underweight 4/259=1.5%
7
7.
O
Overweight
i h 17/259=6.6%
17/259 6 6%
61
Now place the counts in a histogram largest to smallest
Nowplacethecountsinahistogram,largesttosmallest
100
90
80
70
60
51%
50
40
30
20.5%
14.3%
20
10
0
Wrapper
Open
No Center
6.6%
3 9%
3.9%
No Wrapper
2.3%
1.5%
Underweight
62
Finally add up each and plot as a line diagram
Finally,addupeachandplotasalinediagram
100
92 4%
92.4%
90
98 6%
98.6%
100 1%
100.1%
85.8%
80
C
Cumulativepercentageline
l ti
t
li
71.5%
70
60
96 3%
96.3%
51%
50
40
30
20.5%
14 3%
14.3%
20
10
0
Wrapper
Open
No Center
6.6%
3.9%
2.3%
No Wrapper
1.5%
Underweight
63
Cumulative percentage line
Cumulativepercentageline
100
92.4%
90
98.6%
100.1%
2.3%
1.5%
85.8%
80
71 5%
71.5%
70
60
96.3%
51%
50
40
30
20.5%
20
14.3%
6 6%
6.6%
10
0
Wrapper
Open
No Center
3.9%
No Wrapper
Underweight
64
ProcessCapability,Cp
Process
Capability Cp
ProcessCapabilityIndex(Ratio),CpKorCpk
65
Process Capability
ProcessCapability
.
)
SOP
.
:
-1 X 3S
-2 Cp
-3 NormalDistribution
66
X 3S
-1 Targetvalue 200
-2 USP 190
210 .
.
200
-3
-4 SD
IPQC
.
-5 SOP
.
-6 SD 2
194 206 )
( .
67
Cp- Process
P
C
Capability
bilit Index
I d
U
Upper
S tan dard
d d Limit
Li i Lower
L
S tan dard
d d lim
li it
i
Cp =
6
USL LSL
CP =
6
C PK
April 15, 2014
USL X X LSL
= Minimum
,
3
3
68
69
70
Cp ProcessCapabilityIndex
Process Capability Index
Design
Specifications
(a) Natural variation
exceeds design
specifications;
process is not capable of
meeting specifications all
tthe
e ttime.
e
Process
Design
Specifications
71
Cp ProcessCapabilityIndex
Process Capability Index
Design
Specifications
(c) Design
specifications greater
than natural variation;
process is capable of
always conforming to
specifications.
p
P
Process
Design
Specifications
Process
72
Processcapabilityistheabilityoftheprocesstomeetthe
desired quality (as measured by the specifications)
desiredquality(asmeasuredbythespecifications)
Natual Tolerance Limits
LNTL
-6
-5
-4
-3
UNTL
-2
-1
Standard Deviations
73
Processcapabilityistheabilityoftheprocesstomeetthe
desired quality (as measured by the specifications)
desiredquality(asmeasuredbythespecifications)
USL
Cp = 2.00
Cp = 1.33
Cp = 1.00
Cp = 0.75
74
Cpk ) (
EffectsofReducingVariabilityonProcessCapability
Nominal value
Six sigma
Four sigma
Two sigma
Lower
specification
Upper
specification
Mean
April 15, 2014
75
USL
Cp = 1.33
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
Standard Deviations
76
77
78
How to Calculate CP and CPK
HowtoCalculateCPandCPK
Step5
DetermineCpu andCpltocalculateCpk index.
Cpu istheindexofthetotalprocessvariationwithrespecttoupper
specificationlimit(USL)andCplistheindexofthetotalprocess
variationassociatedwithlowerspecificationlimit(LSL).
AfterdeterminingCpu
After determining Cpu andCpl,whicheverresultsinthesmallest
and Cpl, whichever results in the smallest
value istheCpk index.
Cpu =(USLsamplemean)/3xstandarddeviation.
= (USLsample mean)/3x standard deviation
Cpl=(LSLsamplemean)/3xstandarddeviation.
April 15, 2014
79
Cpk
p Cp
p
Cpk Cp
.
Inqualitymanagement,Cp isgenerallywithhighervalue comparedto
Cpk withtheconsiderationthattheprocessisnotcentered withinthe
specificationlimits.
Cpk
. Cp
TheCpk indexcanchange intheprocessbyadjustingthecenteringof
theprocess;however,Cpalwaysremainsthesameunless anychangeis
madeonprocessitself.
April 15, 2014
80
Cpk
C t Off
CutOffs
Cpk > 1.33
)(
MotorolasSixSigmaQuality
Cp=2.00,andCpk =1.50
PPM=3.4
1<Cpk <1.33
)( . 1.33 1
)( .
Cp>1
.
81
Automated Control Charts
AutomatedControlCharts
82
SixSigma
83
Definition Six Sigma
DefinitionSixSigma
:(
)
SixSigma(instatistics):
Si Si
(i
i i )
thedefinitionofoutcomesascloseaspossibletoperfection.
99.9997 3.4
Withsixstandarddeviations,wearriveat3.4defectspermillion
opportunities,or99.9997percent,
.
soreachingSixSigmameansthatyourprocessorproductwill
performwithalmostnodefects.
performwithalmostnodefects
April 15, 2014
84
Definition Six Sigma
DefinitionSixSigma
SixSigma(asaphilosophy):
g
(
p
p y)
isatotalmanagementcommitmentandphilosophyofexcellence,
customerfocus,processimprovement,andtheruleof
measurement.
85
The Classical View of Performance
TheClassicalViewofPerformance
SixSigmaisaphilosophy:
Whyisnt 99%acceptablegoodenough...??
15minuteseachdayofunsafedrinkingwater.
5,000incorrectsurgicalproceduresperweek.
4ormoreaccidentsperdayatmajorairports.
200,000wrongdrugprescriptionseachyear.
200,000 wrong drug prescriptions each year.
7hourseachmonthwithoutelectricity.
Long-Term
Long
Term Yield
3 Sigma Process Capability
93.32%
Historical Standard
99.38%
Current Standard
99.99966%
World-Class
World
Class
86
Hi t
History
of6Sigma
f 6 Si
6Sigmamanufacturingphilosophy camefromMotorola
Theyrecognisedthatsufficientprocessimprovementwouldnotoccurusing
a conventional approach to quality.
aconventionalapproachtoquality.
Itwasdevelopedtohelpthemreducevariationwithinaprocess byfocusing
effortonimprovinginputstoaprocess ratherthanreacting tooutputs.
On target, minimum process variation
April 15, 2014
87
6 Sigma
6Sigma
Theprocesswasfailingthecustomerexpectations
4 3
1.33 1.0 Cpk
. % 99.3 %93
Traditionally,
Traditionally,processesaimedforprocesscapabilityof3to4sigma
processes aimed for process capability of 3 to 4 sigma
(Cpk =1.0to1.33or93%to99.3%acceptable)
)( 6200
Thecustomerreceived6200defectiveproductpermillionatbest
Cpk=2 6
P
Processesnowaimfor6sigma(Cpk=2)
i f 6 i
(C k 2)
. 3.4
Thecustomerwouldreceive3.4
The customer would receive 3 4 defectiveproductpermillion
defective product per million
April 15, 2014
88
Cpk
p
89
6
6sigmaProcessCapability
g
p
y
Whatisit(CPK)
3Sigma(Processcapabilityof1CPK)
3 Sigma ( Process capability of 1 CPK )
if the process (lorry) slightlyvariesthenthescrapordamagewilloccur
slightly varies then the scrap or damage will occur
iftheprocess(lorry)
6Sigma(Processcapabilityof2CPK)
if the process (lorry) varies, there will be no scrap or damage
iftheprocess(lorry)varies,therewillbenoscrapordamage
Curbs=
requiredprocesstolerances
CPKof1
(3 sigma)
(3sigma)
April 15, 2014
CPKof2
(6 i
(6sigma)
)
Statistical Process Control, SPC
Dr. Mehdizadeh
90
91
Evaluation of blistering
g process
p
in XXX Pharmaceutical
Company
April 15, 2014
92
Analyze
1 Cause and effect diagram
1.Causeandeffectdiagram
93
94
Improvement methodology
Improvementmethodology
DMAIC
Define
Measure
Analyze
Improve
Control
95
Quality provided
to patients
2
3
4
5
6
308,537
66,80
80
66
66,807
807
76,210
233
3.4
Yield
Cost of Quality
69.2%
93 3%
93.3%
99.4%
99.98%
99.99966%
25-35%
20 25%
20-25%
12-18%
4-8%
1-3%
by testing !!!!
Data from: Dr. Doug Dean & Frances Bruttin
PriceWaterhouseCoopers
66745579
66745578
97