Case 7: Teens first Car

Bowling v. Sperry
By: Tangi Miller & Nadia Rivera

Overview of the Case

The case questions whether a contract is enforceable
when it is entered into by a minor.
Synopsis rule of law says that with certain exceptions,
contracts entered into by minors are voidable and can
be rescinded.

Background Summary
A 16 year old high school student named Larry Bowling
purchased a car from a used car lot for $140. The car broke
down and Bowling wanted to return the car back and get
the whole amount that he spent on it back.Larry claimed
that he did not have the legal capability to enter the
contract, his contract was voidable allowing Sperry to
disaffirm the contract.

Issue before the Court

When youre a minor when you get into a
contract with an adult, who buys a car from a
car dealer, may disclaim the sale after the
automobile breaks down and needs to be fixed.
The car was needed.

Facts
Larry is a 16 year old (minor)
On June 29, 1957 he purchased the 1947 Plymouth
Automobile.
The car was $140.
He put a down payment of $50.
Returned on July 1st to pay the balance of $90.

Facts (Continued)
Larry drove the car several times and discovered that
the main bearing was burned out.
He then learned to fix the car amount would cost $45$95.
He refused to pay the amount and left the car on the lot.
Sperry refuses to refund Bowlings money.
Thats when a lawsuit was followed.

What formed the Argument

When sperry refuses to refund Bowlings money thats
when it became an issue.
What led up to it was:
The voidable contracts.
Main bearing being burned out.

Outcome
It was reversed and remanded.

You be the Judge:

We feel that even though he is a minor Bowling
should get his money back full refund. With no
exceptions only if that was not included in the
contract. If the main bearing was burned out
and was noted in the contract the Bowling
shouldnt get his full refund back.

Graphics
Bowling V. Sperry