Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fick and Maxwell Diffusion in Liquids
Fick and Maxwell Diffusion in Liquids
in liquids
Thijs J.H. Vlugt
Professor and Chair Engineering Thermodynamics
Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
t.j.h.vlugt@tudelft.nl,
http://homepage.tudelft.nl/v9k6y
August 13, 2012
Collaborators
[1]
n1
X
k=1
Dik xk
Pn
i=1 Ji
=0
[2]
n
n
X
X
xii
xiJj xj Ji
xixj (uj ui)
=
=
RT
Dij
ct
Dij
j=1,j6=i
j=1,j6=i
Ji = uici = uixict
n
X
i=1
xii = 0
Dij is less composition dependent than Fick diffusivities
Possibility to predict
Dij using theory...
[3]
10
C2mimCl-H2O
H2O-C2mimCl
C4mimCl-H2O
H2O-C4mimCl
IL /(10
-9
-1
m s )
H2O-C8mimCl
C8mimCl-H2O
0.1
0.01
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
x CnmimCl
0.8
1.0
[4]
xj 1 xj
x 1 xk
xi 1 xi
Dijk )
Dij ) (
(
Dij ) (
What about
Dijk
xi
xj
xk 1
xk 1
D
+
D
xi + xj ik
xi + xj jk
x 1
x 1
x 1
x 1
x 1
= (
Dikk
WK (1990)
Dijk
KT (1991)
Dijk
VKB (2005)
Dijk
DKB (2005)
Dijk
RS (2007)
Dijk
x 1
x 1
Djkk
x 1
Dijj
xi 1 1/4
Dij
)
[5]
[6]
(Open?) Questions
Is the quality of Vignes increased/decreased by a particular model choice for
xk 1
D
?
ij
x 1
WK (1990)
k
D
ij
KT (1991)
k
D
ij
x 1
x 1
VKB (2005)
k
D
ij
DKB (2005)
k
D
ij
RS (2007)
k
D
ij
x 1
x 1
x 1
x 1
j
i
D
ij D
ij
q
xk 1 xk 1
D
ik D
jk
xj
xi
xk 1 xi +xj
xk 1 xi +xj
D
D
ik
jk
xj
xi
xk 1
xk 1
D
+
D
ik
jk
xi + xj
xi + xj
k
(D
ik
x 1
x 1
k
D
jk
x 1
j
D
ij
x 1 1/4
i
D
ij
ij
1
1
lim
6N m m t
1
3N
dt
*N
i
X
l=1
* N
i
X
(rl,i(t + m t) rl,i(t))
l=1
Nj
k=1
vl,i(0)
k=1
vk,j (t)
Note: ij = ji (Onsager)
Krishna & Van Baten, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2005, 44, 6939-6947.
[7]
D
12
B
A + (x1 + x3 )
C
x1 D
2
11 23 x2 12 x3 21 + 11 x3 22 11 x3 x2 22 + 11 23 x2 11 x3 x2 32
2
2
2
+11 33 x2 13 x1 22 x1 x3 11 22 + 13 22 x1 x1 31 x3 22 + 33 x1 22
2
+12 23 x1 + 12 x3 x2 21 + 13 x1 x2 22 + 12 x3 31 x2 + 13 x2 21 13 x2 21
2
2
2
13 x2 31 + x1 12 x3 21 x1 12 23 + x1 32 x3 21 x1 32 23 + 13 x1 x2 32
+x1 11 23 x2 + x1 31 23 x2 12 x1 23 x2 12 x1 33 x2 x1 13 x2 21
x1 33 x2 21
12 x3 13 x2 x1 x3 12 + x1 x2 23 x1 x3 32 + x1 x2 33
2
11 23 x2 12 21 x3 + x3 11 22 x2 x3 11 22 + 11 23 x2 x2 x3 11 32
2
2
2
+11 33 x2 13 22 x1 x1 x3 11 22 + x1 13 22 x1 x3 31 22 + x1 22 33
2
+x1 12 23 + x2 x3 12 21 + x1 x2 13 22 + x2 x3 12 31 + x2 13 21 x2 13 21
2
2
2
x2 13 31 + x1 x3 12 21 x1 12 23 + x1 x3 32 21 x1 32 23 + x1 x2 13 32
+x1 x2 11 23 + x1 x2 31 23 x1 x2 12 23 x1 x2 12 33 x1 x2 13 21
x1 x2 33 21
3
2
2
22 x3 23 x2 22 x3 x2 + 23 x2 x2 12 x3 + 13 x2 x2 32 x3 + 33 x2
[8]
[9]
ii
=
kk
ij,j6=i
1
3N
dt
0
Ni
X
l=1
vl,i(0)
Ni
X
+
vg,i(t)
g=1
Z
Ni
dt hvi,1(0) vi,1(t)i
3N 0
xiCii
+
Nk
Nk
Z *X
X
1
vg,k (t)
dt
vl,k (0)
3N 0
g=1
l=1
1
3N
dt
0
*N
k
X
l=1
+
vl,k (0) vl,k (t)
1
3N
xk Ckk + xk N Ckk
+
Nj
Ni
Z *X
X
1
dt
vl,i(0)
vk,j (t)
3N 0
l=1
k=1
Z
NiNj
dt hv1,i(0) v1,j (t)i
3N 0
N xixj Cij
dt
0
*N
Nk
k
X
X
l=1 g=1,g6=l
+
vl,k (0) vg,k (t)
[10]
[11]
x 1
Dijk
x 1
k
k
Di,self
Dj,self
x 1
k
Dk,self
+ Cx
?
Cx = N (Cij Cik Cjk + Ckk
)
x 1
Dijk
x 1
k
k
Di,self
Dj,self
x 1
k
Dk,self
Prediction
MD b
AD a
Prediction
MD c
AD a
Prediction
MD d
AD a
Prediction
MD e
AD a
a
incl. Cx
1.401
1.411
1%
0.310
0.318
2%
3.344
3.348
0%
0.172
0.172
0%
3
MS diffusivity D
12
Cx = 0
WK
KT
1.441
1.296
0.952
1.411
1.411
1.411
2%
8%
32%
0.315
0.390
0.248
0.318
0.318
0.318
1%
23%
22%
3.288
1.296
0.682
3.348
3.348
3.348
2%
61%
80%
0.161
0.389
0.101
0.172
0.172
0.172
7%
126% 42%
VKB
0.952
1.411
32%
0.248
0.318
22%
0.682
3.348
80%
0.101
0.172
42%
DKB
0.952
1.411
32%
0.248
0.318
22%
0.683
3.348
80%
0.101
0.172
42%
RS
1.111
1.411
21%
0.311
0.318
2%
0.940
3.348
72%
0.198
0.172
15%
[12]
rho
0.1
== 0.1
rho
0.2
== 0.2
rho
0.3
== 0.3
rho
0.4
== 0.4
rho
0.5
== 0.5
12
100
10
0.1
1
10
100
1000
M3
x 1
x 1
k
D
ij
x 1
k
k
Di,self
Dj,self
x 1
k
Dk,self
10000
[13]
[14]
x1 1b
x2 1c
x3 1d
a
MS Diffusivity/(109 m2s1)
x 1
MD simulation
Prediction of
Dijk
D23
incl. Cx ADa Cx = 0
4.07
4.12
1%
3.78
D13
incl. Cx ADa Cx = 0
2.19
2.21
1%
2.69
incl. Cx ADa Cx = 0
D12
2.99
2.93
2%
2.82
ADa
7%
ADa
23%
ADa
6%
[15]
Prediction of
D23
MD b
AD a
Prediction of
D13
MD c
AD a
Prediction of
D12
MD d
AD a
incl. Cx
2.68
2.68
0%
3.17
3.24
2%
5.01
4.76
5%
Cx = 0 WK
KT
VKB
1.57
2.07
1.25
1.25
2.68
2.68
2.68
2.68
41%
23% 53% 53%
2.07
1.20
2.04
2.04
3.24
3.24
3.24
3.24
36%
63% 37% 37%
1.06
1.78
1.72
1.72
4.76
4.76
4.76
4.76
78%
63% 64% 64%
DKB
1.32
2.68
51%
2.06
3.24
37%
1.73
4.76
64%
RS
1.61
2.68
40%
1.56
3.24
52%
1.75
4.76
63%
[16]
n
X
i=1
xi
Di,self
is recovered
Fick
[Dij
] = [Bij ]1[ij ]
n
X
xi
xj
Bii =
+
D
Dij
in j=1,j6=i
!
1
1
Bij = xi
D
Din
ij
ij = ij + xi
lni
xj
T,p,
Fick
Note: molar reference frame for [Dij
]
with i = 1, , (n 1)
with i, j = 1, , (n 1) i 6= j
[17]
ln 1
x1
p,T
hNN i hNihN i
hNihN i
c
Z
V T
2
g (r) 1 r dr
= 4
0
Z
NV T
2
g (r) 1 r dr
4
= v
[18]
[g(r) 1] r2dr
Rr
2
3
4
0
= 1, = 1
= 2, = 2
= 1, = 2
8
r/[]
10
12
14
[19]
[20]
periodic
non-periodic
[21]
[22]
1.0
1.5
2.0
= 1, = 1
= 2, = 2
= 1, = 2
2.5
3.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
1/L/[1/]
0.4
0.5
[23]
Lt/[]
10
20
30
40
11
22
12
11
22
12
11
22
12
11
22
12
R/[]
4.503
5.000
6.023
6.027
from g(r)
-0.977
-1.633
-0.275
-1.508
-2.456
-0.429
-1.552
-2.577
-0.428
-1.574
-2.555
-0.455
new method
-1.601
-2.686
-0.440
-1.594
-2.601
-0.464
-1.600
-2.602
-0.461
-1.600
-2.621
-0.463
[24]
Acetone-tetrachloromethane (1)
1.1
Thiswork,
work 298K
(MD)
this
1.0
Experiments298K
experiment,
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
x1
298K, 1atm
0.8
1.0
[25]
Acetone-tetrachloromethane (2)
this
Thiswork
work
exp
- Hardt et al
Experiments
exp
- Babb et al
Experiments
Darken
+ LBV
Prediction
by Eqs. (8, 17, 18)
4
3
D Fick / (10
-9
m 2 s -1 )
2
1
0
0
298K, 1atm
0.2
0.4
x1
0.6
0.8
[26]
298K, 1atm
[27]
[28]
Conclusions