TECHNICAL REPORT No, 55-5. Oregon State Highway Department 1955

TECHNICAL REPORT No, 55-5
Oregon State Highway Department

R. H. BALDOCK, State Highway Engineer
W. C. WILLIAMS, Deputy State Highway Engineer
FREEWAY AND EXPRESSWAY SYSTEM

PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA
1955
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION

PLANNING SURVEY SECTION
Survey Conducted In Cooperation With The
U. S. Department of Commerce
Bureau of Public Roads
Published by
Oregon State Highway Commission

Salem, Oregon
BEN R. CHANDLER, Chairman
CHAS. H. REYNOLDS, Commissioner
JUNE, 1955
M. K. McIVER, Commissioner
TECHNICAL REPORT No. 55-5
Oregon State Highway Department

R. H. BALDOCK, State Highway Engineer
W. C. WILLIAMS, Deputy State Highway Engineer
FREEWAY AND EXPRESSWAY SYSTEM

1955
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION

PLANNING SURVEY SECTION
Survey Conducted In Cooperation With The
U. S. Department of Commerce
Bureau of Public Roads
Published by
Oregon State Highway Commission

Salem, Oregon
BEN R. CHANDLER, Chairman
CHAS. H. REYNOLDS, Commissioner
JUNE, 1955
M. K. McIVER, Commissioner
PORTLAND WESTSIDE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
T A B L E
0 F
C O N T E N T S
Page
Page
INTRODUCTION
PURPOSE
OF
ECONOMIC
STUDY
FACTORS
Economic
INFLUENCING
Base
Base
Traffic
Population
Vehicle
PATTERNS
Trends
Registrations
Trends
and F o r e c a s t s
- Study
Trends
and F o r e c a s t s
- Freeway-Expressway
OF
STREET
1955 T r a f f i c
System..
12
15
16
NET
18
Flow
19
Existing
Willamette
Existing
State
Major
AND HIGHWAY
Area
Traffic
USE
Generators
Traffic
PRESENT
* * *
Transportation
Selected
TRAFFIC
River
Bridges
and F e d e r a l
Directional
Desire
20
Highway
System
. . . .
21
Lines
F13 - S e l l w o o d F r e e w a y
F14 - G l e n c u l l e n F r e e w a y
EXPRESSWAYS
El
- McLoughlin
- M t . Hood
Expressway
E3
Eastside
Expressway
E4
Industrial
E5
- Oregon
Areas
The
E6
- Multnomah
E8
E9
- Barnes
Street
96
98
(US30)
Expressway
Expressway
(Oregon
City,
104
US99E)
106
Expressway
108
(US 3 0 - B y p a s s )
110
Road E x p r e s s w a y
E10
- Johnson
Ell
- Hillsboro
E12
- Cedar
E13
- Oatfield
102
(ORE43)
Expressway
Columbia
E14 - S t .
Bridge
(US99E)
100
Expressway
City
E7
Expressway
(US26)
Creek
Expressway
Expressway
Expressway
118
Expressway
Johns-Sunset
of
to
Design
25
Serve
25
Freeway-Expressway
Realized
RECOMMENDED
System
from
Freeway-Expressway
29
System
32
PROGRAM
Cost
of
Freeway
Cost
of
Expressway
120
Expressway
122
STREETS
125
of Major
Ml
- Barbur
M2
- Union-Grand
M3
- Be a v e r t o n - H i 1 1 s d a l e
Projects
Street
36
36
Projects
38
126
Avenue
M4
- Macadam
M5
- Morrison
M6
- Hawthorne
M7
- Division Street
35
Projects
Boulevard
One-Way
Couplet
Highway
(ORE10)
127
and B e r t h a
Boulevard
Street
and M o r r i s o n - B e l m o n t
Bridge
Couplet
FREEWAYS
45
- Banfield
Freeway
F2
- Harbor
F3
- Portland-Salem
Drive
(US3G)
Freeway
(US99)
Freeway
(US99)
F4
- M t . Hood
F5
Sunset
F6
Industrial
F7
- Delaware
F8
- Stadium
Freeway
(US99-US30
F9
Fremont
Freeway
(US30 A l t e r n a t e )
F10
Laurelhurst
Fll
East
F12
Cascade
Freeway
46
Freeway
(US26)
(US26)
Freeway
Freeway
Bank
(US30)
Approach
Street
One-Way
and H a w t h o r n e - M a d i s o n
Couplet
Street
Alternate)
(US99 A l t e r n a t e )
Freeway
(ORE213)
130
One-Way
131
132
M8
- 82nd Avenue
133
M9
- Tualatin Valley Highway
134
135
Mil - East Burnside Street
136
M12 - Halsey Street
137
M13 - McLoughlin Boulevard
138
50
M14 - Powell Boulevard - Foster Road
56
M15 - 15th-16th Avenue One-way Couplet
139
140
60
M16 - Oswego Highway
64
M17 - Powell Valley Road
142
66
M18 - Scholia
143
(ORE43)
141
Ferry Highway
70
M19 - Cornell Road
144
74
M20 - Lake Road
145
76
M21
M22
M23
M24
146
147
148
149
(US99)
Freeway
Freeway
128
129
Bridge
M10 - 122nd Avenue
Fl
114
116
Hi 1 1 s - T u a l a t i n
Road
112
24
Benefits
Cost
Water
Boulevard
22
PLAN
Levels
95
E2
MAJOR
BASIC
90
92
80
84
Clackamas Highway
Gresham Road
Sandy Boulevard
162nd Avenue
86
LIST OF PUBLICATIONS
....
150
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Page
Frontispiece
- Portland
Fl - Banfield
F2 - Harbor
Construction
Model
of Harbor
Drive
Street
Traffic
Proposed
Hood
Drive
F4 - Mt. Hood
at Harbor
Tigard,
Por11 and-Sal em
Looking
Looking
North
Section
Freeway
Freeway
Freeway
Freeway,
with
at S.W.
Macadam
Typical
Elevated
and Twin
Section
Looking
East
Looking West
F8 - Stadium
Freeway
F9 - Fremont
Freeway
Fll - East Bank

F12 - Cascade
to Harbor
Drive
Front
Avenue
Changes
IV
Characteristics
Trans-Willamette
in Vancouver,
Washington,
Interchange
Connections
Bridges in Background
Street
to
Looking Northwesterly.
Looking North
Avenue North
Ell
26
28
Page
Relation
of Oregon
Transportation
Industrial
Traffic
Population
Trends
and P o r t l a n d
to E l e v e n
System
Western
States
. . . .
Generators
4
6
in P o r t l a n d
Study
Area
and F o r e c a s t ,
City
of Portland
and P o r t l a n d
Urban
Area,
1900-1975
Trends
10
Total
Vehicle
75
Index
of A v e r a g e
East
. .
. . . . .
77
. . . . .
79
T r e n d of A v e r a g e D a i l y T r a f f i c on R o s s I s l a n d B r i d g e and
S.W. H a r b o r D r i v e s o u t h o f S.W. M a r k e t S t r e e t
Index of Average
81
85
in the S t u d y
Registration
Area
11
1938-1975
13
Daily
Traffic
Traffic
at F i v e
Portland
on the P r o p o s e d
Locations
Portland
. . .
14
15
Freeway-
System
16
Flow Map
19
10 -
1955 Traffic
93
11 -
State
and F e d e r a l
Highway
97
12 -
Major
Directional
Desire
13 -
Proposed
103
14 -
Time
105
15 -
Traffic
16 -
Aerial
91
Expressway
. . . . .
. . . . .
Expressway
Expressway
Expressway
Expressway
Expressway
Expressway
Expressway
23
1975
Contours
31
.
33
Flow Map 1975

Photo
Looking
Ill
37
- Portland
Westside
Central
Business
District
17 -
Portland
18
East
Northwest
Westside
40
Central
Business
District
Looking
South
. . .
41
115
117
Expressway
Zone
Lines
21
109
113
Expressway
Plan
System
107
*
Expressway
E14 - St. Johns-Sunset
Expressway
Daily
87
Expressway
Road
Traffic
Population
Freeway
E12 - Cedar Hi 11s-Tualatin

E13 - Oatfield
12
City Bridge
- Hillsboro
1940-1950
Highways
73
Portals, Looking
Creek
River
Population
Arterial
101
E10 - Johnson
Area
Urban
Expressway
E8 - Columbia
Study
of
E3 - Eastside
E9 - Barnes Road
Portland
of
99
E7 - Multnomah
in
LIST OF FIGURES
71
72
Freeway
Street
Delaware
Expressway
E6 - Water
Portland
71
E2 - Mt. Hood
E5 - Oregon
and
69
to
Interj^Tate Bridges, Looking Southwesterly.
above N. Interstate
Boulevard
E4 - Industrial
Portland
62
69
Freeway
El - McLoughlin
of
Figure
.
Freeway
F14 - Glencullen
III
57
Freeway,
Freeway
F13 - Sellwood
City
Oregon
62
Street
F10 - Laurelhurst
and F o r e c a s t ,
of
Seattle
1920-1975
55
71
Connections
South of N. Lombard
Rocky Butte Tunnel
Area
and t h e S t a t e
and
and
. . . . .
Above N.W.
Interstate
Section
Russell
Connection
Bridge
and Denver Avenue
Typical
Urban
Trends
the Portland
67
Freeway
F7 - Delaware
of Union
Population
for
59
122nd Avenue,
to Steel
Model
Delaware
65
of Industrial
of US99
II
Areas
Data
58
Freeway
Elevated
Metropolitan
52
Barbur
Freeway
Looking South
Manufacturing
61
East cf
N.
Freeway,
Freeway
F6 - Industrial
Selected
54
West
East of Cascade
Freeway
. . . .
Drive
Section
Model
Freeway
Freeway
Section
F5 - Sunset
51
Typical
Typical
(US99 ) - Sunset
Freeway
Typical
Model
Freeway
Connections Por11 and-Sa1 em Freeway

Avenues,
Page
-
47
Interchange
near
Table
I
District
. .
- Harbor
F3 - Portland-Salem
Boulevard
Business
Freeway
Stage
Proposed
Central
Freeway
Drive
Clay-Market
Westside
119
121
123
19 -
Side
Looking
Portland
Northwest
Looking
along
Northwest
the W i l l a m e t t e
42
River
. . . . . . . . . .
43
INTRODUCTION
THE
SULT
OF PORTLAND
OF INDUSTRIAL
WHICH
IT SERVES
GROWTH
DURING
VEHICULAR
ABLY
THE
RATE
THIS
DISPARITY
STREETS
TERN
WHICH
IMPOSED.
TWEEN
CERTAIN
ORDER
T O AVOID
DIRECT
LINES
HAS
HAS
UNDERGONE
MANY
LARGE
TERMINI
AND
BOTH
CONGESTION,
MOBILE
EVER
D E M A N D " THE
CONSIDER-
AND
CAP-
TERMIN-
INCREASING
MAJORITY OF
IN F U N C T I O N A L
PAT-
INADEQUATE
T O MEET
THE
OF VEHICLES
MOVING
BE-
RATHER
-1 -
RAPID
CONSEQUENCE
AT A
IT A D V A N T A G E O U S
OF TRAVEL .
THOROUGHFARE
OF THIS
OF THEM
FIND
AS A
AND
A CHANGE
GROUPS
ACTIVITIES F O R
INCREASED
STREET
SUPPLY
A S A RE-
H A SE X P E R I E N C E D
A S REGARDS
ff
LEFT
ENVIRONS.
DECADES,
AS A RESULT
HAVE
HAS
TWO
DEMAND
IS TRUE
BETWEEN
THE
BURDEN
PAST
THAN
FACILITIES.
AND
A N DA G R I C U L T U R A L
AS A FOCUS,
TRAFFIC
FASTER
ACITY.
AL
CITY
THAN
T O D E T O U R IN
T O FOLLOW
MORE
PURPOSE OF STUDY
THE
L I G E N T
D I S C H A R G E
T R A N S P O R T
AS
HIGHWAY
W E L L
S Y S T E M
A S
E N G I N E E R
O F H I S F U N C T I O N
W H I C H
W I L L
A N T I C I P A T E D
A S A
P R E R E Q U I S I T E
F O R M A T I O N
MUST
B E O B T A I N E D
WERE
A N DT R I P
O B T A I N E D
R E P O R T
SURVEY
THE
AND
1 9 4 6
TRAFFIC
THAT
THAT
CITY
OF PORTLAND.
FROM
THIS
A PLAN
THESOUTHWEST
PORTLAND
FREEWAY,
B A S I C
ONCE
I N
PLAN
ACCOMMODATE
REPORT.
I N -
DATA
T E C H N I C A L
NOT
PLANS
ONLY
THE
STREETS
LEADING
COAST,
T H E 1 4 T HA V E N U E
BRIDGE.
T H EN. W. FRONT
ON
AVENUE.
82ND
FREEWAY
TO CANYON
VIADUCT
AVENUE
AVENUE
THESE
FREEWAY,
OF T H E 1946 SURVEY
VIADUCT.
A N D OTHER
ROUTES
WERE
IS T H E
REPORT
RECOMMENDS
ADDITIONAL
ANTICIPATED
1975 TRAFFIC
REPORT.
REVIEW
SOME
STUDY
1 9 7 5A V E R A G E
AND
AS CAN BE EXPECTED
OF
DAILY
COMPASSES
A LARGER
AUGMENTED
WITH
ACCUMULATED
CLAY AND
PURPOSES
AND THE OREGON
HEREINBEFORE.
FEATURES
ROUTES
FACILITIES
MAJOR
1949
STREET)
HIGHWAYS
T O BE STILL
CATEGORY
ADEQUATE.
WERE
AS N O W EXIST
A MASTER
PLAN OF
FOR T H E CITY
PARTICULAR
STUDY EN-
WAS CONSIDERED
BUT THAT
TRAFFIC
IN
STUDY
VOLUMES
THE
C A NBE
COUPLED
SO AS TO BE ADEQUATE
REPORT
WILL
(THEFREEWAY,
ANDWILL
WHICH
TEND
OF LOCAL
TO A LESSER
-2-
THAN
DEVELOPED
RE-EVALUATE 1955
VOLUMES.
THIS
WILL
ORIGIN-DESTINA -
TO BE DEVELOPED
STUDY,
INFORMATION
AREA
WILL
TO EXIST
PRESENT-DAY
THIS
OF
TO CARE FOR
WITH
FOR THE
OF PLANNING.
STREET
AND BOULEVARDS
THEIR
THE NEEDS AND
FACILITIES
TRAFFIC
AREA
THE SOUTHEAST
FOUND
FORECASTS
TIME
AND VICINITY.
1946PORTLAND
IN
AND TO EVALUATE
AS MENTIONED
ANDEXPRESSWAYS
PORTLAND
OF HIGHWAYS. TO
DEMANDS.
A N D AT T H E SAME
AND
IN T R A F F I C A N D
SYSTEM
OF T H E SALIENT
ORIGINAL
COMPARABLE
ALSO
OF PRESENT
OF T H E FREEWAY
GROWTH
PLANS
LINEAL
BANFIELD
RE-EXAMINED
A N D WERE
THIS
FREEWAYS
WITH THE
AND THE FREMONT
RAPID
PRIOR
ADEQUACY.
TION
DE-
AND HIGHWAYS.
BETWEEN
ROAD
AND THE EVOLUTION
OF THE INTERSTATE
EXAMINE
IN V I E W
IN T H E 1 9 4 6 P O R T L A N D - M E T R O P O L I T A N
IN 1 9 4 4 T H E S T A T E
FOR THE T. H.
PORTLAND
FORMATION
AGAIN
ADVISABLE.
AN AMAZINGLY
THIS
FREEWAYS
IN 1 9 7 5 .
STREETS
WITH
BRIEFLY
OF
STANDARDS
A R E A
IN C O O P E R A T I O N
OF MAJOR
A DEPRESSED
MARKET
ESSENTIALLY
THE
M E T R O P O L I T A N
MASTER
PREPARED,
FREEWAY,
IN L I G H T
V E H I C U L A R
T H O S E
S T U D Y /
DESIGN
COUPLED
E X I S T I N G
T O T H E V O L U M E ,
O F T R A F F I C .
CAN BE EXPECTED
1 9 4 4STUDY,
DEVELOPED.
OF
DAY
1955 TRAFFIC. BUT ALSO THE DEMANDS OF
DEPARTMENT
39TH
R E S P E C T
P O R T L A N D
WILL
OF T H E PRESENT
HIGHWAY
WERE
DEVELOPMENT
SIRES OF EXISTING
PURPOSE
W I T H
O F
P L A N N I N G ,
OR IGIN- D E S T INAT ION
EXPRESSWAYS
FUTURE
T O SUCH
T E R M I N I
SERVE
D E M A N D S
IT N O W A P P E A R S
A N D I N T E L -
P R O M U L G A T E
I N 1 9 4 6A N DA R E D O C U M E N T E D
N O . 4 9 - 2 .
T R A F F I C
M U S T
A D E Q U A T E L Y
F U T U R E
T R A F F I C .
C O M P O S I T I O N .
I N T H EPROPER
DEVELOP
THREE
THE EXPRESSWAY,
N O TTREAT
WITH
TO RELEGATE
U S E OR THAT WOULD
STANDARD.
ONLY
THOSE
THE DEFINITIONS
AND THE
STREETS AND
THEMSELVES
REQUIRE
LEVELS
INTO T H E
DEVELOPMENT
AS NOW APPROVED
FOR
FREEWAY,
AMERICAN
LATER
EXPRESSWAY
ASSOCIATION
IN
BANFIELD
THIS
ACTUALLY
AND
WILL
BE
DOES
NOT,
NOR
RESPONSIBILITIES
MENTAL
AGENCIES
PROGRAM.
FACILITIES
DEMAND
OR
ITIES
THAT
FOR
THAT
WOULD
RECOMMENDATIONS
ACCORD
DOES
WOULD
WOULD
THIS
BE
BE
BY
SAY
THIS
THIS
THE
REPORT
RESULT
FROM
DEFINITION
THIS
WITH
THE
SEVERAL
GOVERN-
IN T H E
OVER-ALL
WITH
CARE
IN M A S S
THE
EXPRESSWAY
REPORT.
TREAT
TO
THE
APPEAR
THAT
TREAT
INVOLVED
ADJUSTMENTS
THIS
TO
REPORT,
NECESSARY
LOGICALLY
OF
THIS
BY
OFFICIALS
WITH
THROUGHOUT
DOES
DESIRABLE
IT
STREET
PORTLAND-SALEM
FINANCING
THAT
NEITHER
HIGHWAY
THE
IN
CALLED
MAJOR
SUFFICE
AND
FREEWAYS
SO
STATE
REPORT.
EXPRESSWAY
ARE
PROGRAM
OF
AND
FOR
TRANSIT
ADOPTION
TERMINAL
PARKING
FACILOF
THE
REPORT.
-3-
ECONOMIC FACTORS INFLUENCING TRAFFIC PATTERN
A PREREQUISITE
EXECUTION
OF A N Y STUDY
A REVIEW
MENT
OF THOSE
OF TRAVEL
ITEMS
ATED
ENCING
POPULATION,
OF THESE
FEATURES
WITH
URBAN
ACCORDINGLY,
FACTORS
ECONOMIC
FIGURE
AND TOPOGRAPHY.
THE
WITH
LIMITED
ACCENTU-
RURAL
TRIP
MOVE-
LENGTHS
OF THESE
INFLU-
DESIRABLE.
LIMITS
TO REACH
AREAS
WESTERN
TOTALED
OF T H E AREA
DIVISION
IN L A R G E
RESULTS
IS L I M I T E D
IS G E N E R A L L Y
RIVER,
AND PORTPOPULATION
IN 1 9 5 0 A N D I S
INTO T W O G E O G R A P H T H E EAST
SIDE H A V -
AND THE POPULATION.
PART
FROM
BY BORDERING
A LEVEL
STATES.
PLAIN.
RIVER
1955.
IS D I V I D E D
BY T H E WILLAMETTE
OF OREGON
373,628
400,000 DURING
PROPER
INDUSTRIAL, AND
AND THE COLUMBIA
THE LOCATION
ING S E V E N - E I G H T H S
SIDE
SUCH
A RESTATEMENT
TO THE ELEVEN
PORTLAND
WEST SIDE
INCLUDE
IS P A R T I C U L A R L Y
OF OREGON
1 SHOWS
THE CITY
EXPECTED
FACTORS
IS T H E C O M M E R C I A L ,
CENTER
RELATIVE
WITHIN
IS
BASE
FINANCIAL
BASIN.
BEHAVIOR
ON T H E ESTABLISH-
AS COMPARED
IS C O N S I D E R E D
PORTLAND
ICAL
THESE
AND SUCCESSFUL
TRAVEL
BEAR
DUE TO THE COMPARATIVELY
INVOLVED.
LAND
WITH
WHICH
PATTERNS.
IN D E A L I N G
MENT,
DEALING
FACTORS
AS CULTURE,
IMPORTANCE
TO THE PLANNING
THIS
T H E FACT
THAT THE
HILLS, WHILE
THE EAST
BORDERING
Figure IRelation of Oregon and Portland to Eleven Western States
T H E CITY OF
-4-
PORTLAND
WEST
ARE MANY
AND SOUTHWEST
AGRICULTURAL
AREA.
LEVEL
NEARLY
GROWTH
MUCH
OF
SHIPPING
VALLEY--A
RICH
INTO
OF PORTLAND
EXPERIENCING
CAN BE TRACED
FOR FOREIGN
EXEMPLIFIES
TO
DIVERS-
ITS LOCATION
AND WILLAMETTE
TO
DEVELOP
COMMERCE
TRAFFIC
IS W E L L
BOTH
AND AS AN
ON THE INLAND
THE PRINCIPLE
SEATTLE METROPOLITAN
BY T H E P R O C E S S
HIGHER
AREA.
OREGON
IN T H E O R E G O N
WORKED
AT PLANTS
METROPOLITAN
AREA
IN
OVER
AREA
4 0 PER
E M P L O Y E E S IN
PORTION
OF T H E
1947.
TABLE I
SELECTED MANUFACTURING DATA FOR THE PORTLAND AND
SEATTLE METROPOLITAN AREAS. AND THE STATE OF OREGON
WATERWAYS.
THERE
METROPOLITAN
METROPOLITAN
OF M A N U F A C T U R I N G
IMPOR-
THAT POPULATION AND WEALTH COLLECT WHEREVER
IN W A S H I N G T O N
C E N T OF T H E T O T A L N U M B E R
LOCA-
AREA
OF M A N U F A C T U R I N G . W A S
IN T H E P O R T L A N D
IN T H E S E A T T L E
PORTLAND
RIVERS,
AS
3.
18 P E R C E N T
RAPID
THAN
OF THE CITY
2.
P O R T L A N D M E T R O P O L I T A N A R E A , W H I C H INCLUDES C L A R K C O U N T Y IN W A S H I N G T O N
OREGON
THE VALUE CREATED
LIES
OF URBAN
IS A B R E A K
1.
TO THE
AREA.
THE CITY
FOR BARGE
FORTLAND
IS A L S O
OF THE COLUMBIA
CAUSED
POINT
TERMINUS
TION
WHICH
ITS GROWTH
LOCATION
AREAS.
DEVELOPING
AND SOUTH
THE ECONOMY
THE CONFLUENCE
THUS,
IS R A P I D L Y
AS A RESIDENTIAL
IFIED,
TANT
WHICH
AREA
SUBURBAN
THE TUALATIN
TO THE EAST
WHILE
THIS
LIES
AREA
SUBURBAN
AT
IMPORTANT
1947
TYPE OF
ESTABLISHMENT
NUMBER
OF ESTAB.
AVERAGE NO.
OF EMPLOYEES
VALUE ADDED
BY MFR. 1/
1 ,297
3,075
1 ,221
51.643
105.591
54.770
$314,273,000
675,017,000
265,422.000
9.101
8.658
4,93'6
4.037
3.691
3,387
3,367
2,905
2,853
2.641
6.067
58.611.000
52.790,000
41 ,273.000
30.396,000
19.783.000
18.593.000
17,053,000
12,456,000
14,093,000
12,901,000
36,324,000
IN T R A N S P O R T A T I O N .
ALL ESTABLISHMENTS
RAW
THROUGHOUT
PORTLAND
AREA
AND PROCESSING.
IMPORTANT.
1,400
THE
TEXTILES.
MANUFACTURING
WASHINGTON

STATE OF OREGON
SEATTLE METROPOLITAN AREA
TO THE
BUT PAPER,
APPAREL
PLANTS
METROPOLITAN
COUNTIES
A N D FOOD
ESTABLISHMENTS BY TYPE
PROCESSING
LUMBER AND WOOD PRODUCTS

FOOD AND KINDRED
PAPER & PAPER PRODUCTS
PRIMARY METAL
FABRICATED METAL
PRINTING AND PUBLISHING
MACHINERY
TEXTILE PRODUCTS
FURNITURE AND FIXTURES
TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT
ALL OTHERS
PRIMARY PRO-
OF M E T A L S . AND T H E MANUFACTURE
IT IS C U R R E N T L Y
PORTLAND
PRODUCED
ARE TRANSPORTED
LUMBER
INDUSTRIES.
AND FABRICATION
OF M A C H I N E R Y .
PRODUCTS
BY HIGHWAYS, RAILROADS. A N D WATERWAYS FOR
THE T W O MAJOR
DUCTION
AND FARM
THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST
MANUFACTURE
ARE
MATERIALS
AND FURNITURE
ESTIMATED
EMPLOYING
AREA
THAT
THERE ARE
6 0 , 0 0 0 W O R K E R S IN
(MULTNOMAH,
IN O R E G O N ,
ARE ALSO
AND CLARK
CLACKAMAS,
COUNTY
IN
1/
WASH INGTON) .
TABLE
INDUSTRY
1 POINTS O U T THE RELATIVE
IN T H E F O L L O W I N G
THREE
255
229
26
43
103
178
98
14
52
32
267
IMPORTANCE OF
VALUE ADDED BY MANUFACTURE IS CALCULATED BY SUBTRACT ING COST

OF MATERIAL. SUPPLIES AND CONTAINERS, FUEL. PURCHASED ELECTRIC
ENERGY AND CONTRACT WORK FROM TOTAL VALUE OF SHIPMENTS. IT
APPROXIMATES THE VALUE CREATED IN THE PROCESS OF MANUFACTURING.
SOURCE:
AREAS:
-5-
CENSUS OF MANUFACTURERS. 1947. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS.
AS A RESULT
SENCE
OF A DEEP
CENTER
PORT.
A N D ITS POSITION
OF AN EXTENSIVE
LOCAL
MARKETING
BECOME
THE
1,376
AN IMPORTANT
WHOLESALE
HAD SALES
RETAIL
GOODS
VALUED
MOST
EXCEEDING
AS THE MAJOR
OF OREGON
PROCESSING.
INTO
MOVE
ASTHE
CIFIC
RAILWAY.
NORTHERN
RAILWAY
AND THE NORTHERN PA-
IN 1 9 4 8 .
T H E 7.400
AREA
IN 1 9 4 8 .
RIVER
SOLD
PORTLAND
AND TRADING
THE RAW MATERIALS
FINISHED
GOODS
HAS DEVELOPED.
ILLUSTRATED
THE GREAT
CENTER FOR
BASIN.
BASE
TO THEIR
A N D O U T OF T H E AREA.
SYSTEM
WAY.
IN T H E M E T R O P O L I T A N
$772,000,000
WHOLESALING
THE PRE-
PORTLAND
CENTER.
$1,400,000,000.
AND THE COLUMBIA
TRANSPORTATION
AREA,
IN T H E M E T R O P O L I T A N
AT OVER
TO
WHOLESALING
ESTABLISHMENTS
ESTABLISHMENTS
SERVES
PRODUCTION.
WATER
HAS
AREA
OF T H E LOCAL
PORTLAND FOR
MARKETS.
AN EXTENSIVE
THIS
PICTORIALLY
INTO
AND PEOPLE
TRANSPORTATION
TRANSPORTATION
SYSTEM
AIJ>
IS
IN F I G U R E 2 .
RAILROAD
THE
FIFTY
STEAMSHIP
APPROACHED
AND
WOOD
OF PORTLAND
LINES.
12 MILLION
PRODUCTS.
UCTS.
THIRTY
UPPER
COLUMBIA
WHEAT
PORT
DOWN
IS S E R V E D
CURRENT
TONS
PAPER.
COMPANIES
WATER-BORNE
CONSISTING
WHEAT.
OPERATE
AND PETROLEUM
LARGELY
FLOUR.
THAN
COMMERCE*
OF LUMBER
A N D FOOD
RIVER
A N D ITS TRIBUTARIES,
STREAM
BY MORE
BOATS
PRODON THE
MAINLY
TRANSPORTING
PRODUCTS
T O T H E IN-
TERIOR .
PORTLAND
AND
SEVERAL
"SHORT"
NUS
O F T H E SOUTHERN
IS S E R V E D
LINES.
PACIFIC
BY FIVE
RAIL
IT IS T H E N O R T H E R N
COMPANY,
WEST COAST TERMINALS OF T H EUNION

A TERMINAL FOR T H ESPOKANE.
MAJOR
LINES
TERMI-
O N E O F T H E MAJOR
WATER
PACIFIC RAILROAD, AND
PORTLAND. ANDSEATTLE
RAIL-
-6-
HiigbcAjaiy
EIGHT
VICE
TO MANY
HAWAII
SYSTEM
SERVING
GROWTH
PORTLAND
OF THE AREA
CENTER.
AND
MOTOR
DEVELOPED,
WATER
PORTLAND.
ROUTES,
THE MOST
15 H O U R S
THERE
BY
SIX STATE
TWO
THE
HEAVY
FREIGHT
AND
OF
LINES
HAUL
HEAVY
THE
HAVE
MOTOR
AREA
IMPORTANT MOTOR
RIVER
HEAVY
FARTS
HIGHWAY,
THE MOST
LOCATION
ABOUT
IN
THE
US99E
WOULD
THESE
TRAFFIC
ON
TRAFFIC
STUDY
OF POPULATION AND
PLANS
BOTH
T O T H E T. H.B A N SECTION
AREA.
HAS BEEN
HAVE
DEVELOPMENTS
GENERATORS.
TAP A LARGE
RESIDENTIAL
INDICATION
GENERATORS
FIGURE
3.
MANUFACTURING
WATER
INDUSTRIAL
BARRIER.
AREAS
IMPORTANT
THE PRESENT AND
RETAIL
B E IN P R O X I M I T Y
GENERATORS
TRAFFIC
THROUGHOUT THE
FACILITIES.
SIDE
OF
YEARS,
ON THE DISTRIBUTION
SIDE
TRAFFIC
AN
IS ALSO AN
ARE THE GENERATORS
CENTERS
WILL
THE POSITION
OF THE
THE EFFECT
EVALUATED
OF
IN THIS
REPORT.
OF THE CASCADES.
IT IS THE ONLY
OF SUCH
WHICH
DESTINATION
ATTRACT
ARE LOCATED
FOR TWO EAST
1 0 0 TRIPS
IN F U T U R E
WHICH
IN G E N E R A L .
WOULD
EAST
TO SERVE THE
US30.
AREAS
MADE
AS A GENERATOR
APPRECIABLY
BE IMPORTANT
FREEWAY
POPULUS
PORTLAND
OF THE NATION.
ANNOUNCED
FIELD
100 MOTOR
THAT
OF TRANSPORTATION
DEVELOPMENTS
MADE
IT IS E X P E C T E D
DISTRICT
IST H E
AREA
16 OF EVERY
AREA.
IS D E P E N D E N T
WHICH
PARTS
WEST
AREA
STUDY
ABOUT
DEVELOPMENTS
LIMITED
BY
ALL
USES
AND INDUSTRY
AREAS.
MORE
OF THE PORTLAND
OR A
N O T CHANGE
AREA
ON THE BASIS OF
HAD AN ORIGIN
BUSINESS
COMMERCIAL
FUTURE
SELECTED TRAFFIC GENERATORS
IN U R B A N
WILL
BEEN
U S E H A S BEEN
GRADE ROUTE THROUGH THE CASCADE MOUNTAIN
TRAFFIC
THE CENTRAL
TO ,
SYSTEM
THE AREA
THIS DISTRICT.
IN A D D I T I O N
TO AND FROM
FREIGHT ROUTE AS
COMMERCE
WITHIN
AVAILABILITY
AND FACILITIES
MOVEMENT
1946, IT W A S FOUND
THAT
STUDY
DISTRICT.
IN
FROM
AREA.
BUSINESS
O R I GI N - D E S T I N A T I O N S T U D Y
OTHER
AUGMENTED
AN
AND US3O. ARE
ROAD
LINES.
CONCENTRATION
COLUMBIA
US99
AND LOCAL
AND MANY
SIDE
TRAFFIC
BY
ARE WITHIN
ROUTES
SYSTEM.
FREIGHT
CENTRAL
OF
HIGHWAY
THE PORTLAND
ROUTES,
OF FREIGHT
FREIGHT
POPULATION
UPPER
UPON
HIGHWAY
WEST
PORTLAND
US NUMBERED
TERMINALS
A VARIETY
OF
OF TRAFFIC
WITHIN
IMPROVED
SERVED
GENERATOR
MADE
AND
PORTLAND.
CONVERGING
BY MOTOR
NETWORK
OF THE STATE
AN INCREASINGLY
THE TRADING
HEAVIEST
CORNERS
IN
COMPETITIVE
IN T H E A R E A
THE EXPANDED
FACTOR
WERE
BECAME
TO
AND ROAD
WHOLESALING,
AS THE HIGHWAYS
U S E OF THE STATE
THE SYSTEM
A DECIDING
AS A TRADING,
US NUMBERED
CARS,
SERVICE
THE HIGHWAY
H A S BEEN
ARE SEVEN
OF THE INTERSTATE
PASSENGER
OF
FROM
ROUTES
OF THESE
PART
REMOTE
BY TRUCK
AREAS.
FACILITIES
WITH
PROVIDING SER-
AND DIRECT
TRANSPORTATION
AND RAIL
TODAY,
PORTLAND
POINTS
AND PACIFIC
MANUFACTURING
WITH
SERVE
CONTINENTAL
ALASKA,
THE
AIRLINES
-7-
MAP SHOWS
STUDY
MOST
AREA
THE MAIN
IS S H O W N
OF
OF T H E P R E S E N T
OF P O S S I B L E
13.
INDUSTRIAL
EXISTING
OF P R O B A B L E . F U T U R E
DEVELOPMENT
BY T H E F R E E W A Y - E X P R E S S W A Y
ON F I G U R E
OF
THE LOCATION
AND THE AREAS
EXPANSION.
SERVED
INDICATED
COMMERCIAL
CONCERNS
AND THE AREAS
QUATELY
OF
THIS
OF THE LOCATION
EFFECT
INDUSTRIAL
AREADE-
SYSTEM
OF
A S IS
INDUSTRIAL
FIGURE
INDUSTRIAL
TRAFFIC
GENERATORS
3
IN
PORTLAND
LEGEND
VANCOUVER
MANUFACTURING CONCERN
OR MORE PERSONS.
N
EMPLOYING 5 0
AREAS OF POSSIBLE FUTURE INDUSTRIAL

DEVELOPMENT (COMPLETE INFORMATION
NOT AVAILABLE)
-8-
STUDY
AREA
SOURCE
MANUFACTURING CONCERNS^ FROM "PORTLAND
DIRECTORY"- PORTLAND
AREAS OF POSSIBLE
MANUFACTURING
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE.
FUTURE
EXPANSION: BASED MAINLY
ON INFORMATION FROM MULTNOMAH COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION,

CITY OF PORTLAND PLANNING COMMISSION, AND "COLUMBIA
RIVER
INDUSTRIAL SITE SURVEY 11 BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION,
AND PORTLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
LOCATIONS
ON URBAN
PEAK
VOLUMES
HOUR
IN S O M E
CASES.
PORTION
OF HEAVY
TO T H E AREA.
POPULATION
TRAFFIC
AS A RESULT
IT C O N T R I B U T E S
VEHICLES
THUS
AFFECTING
IS T H A T
OF HOME-TO-WORK
SIGNIFICANTLY
ON T H EMAIN
HIGHWAY
IN T H E W E S T
IT A D D S T O
ULATION
MOVEMENTS.
LITTLE
TO THE PRO-
ROADS
LYING
CAPACITY.
PORTLAND
SIDE
DENSITY
ROOM
INCREASES
OF ACCESS
STUDY
POPULATION
AREA
DURING
INCREASE
T H E 1940*S
AS A
OF DOWNTOWN
PORTLAND.
OF T H EEAST
FOR POPULATION
EXPANSION.
OCCURRED
DISTRICTS.
NORTH
W A S M A D E IN
AREA
IN C E R T A I N
IN T H E S P A R S E L Y
TRENDS
A SIGNIFICANT
THE
PATTERNS
WITHIN
THE.CITY
THE LARGEST
POPULATED
OF N.W. THURMAN
AREA
STREET
SIDE
AREAS
MINOR
LIMITS
OF WHICH
HIGH POPLEFT
PER CENT
IN T H E O U T -
W A ST H E INCREASE
IN W E S T
SIDE
ANDCORNELL
PORTLAND
ROAD.
RESULT
TABLE I I
OF
THELARGE
WARTIME
WAS
ABLE
AND
A D D TO IT, MAINLY
BASIC
NEW
TO RETAIN
EMPLOYMENT.
THIS
BUILDING
INCREASE
BECAUSE
BOTH
PROGRAM.
T H E AREA
POPULATION TRENDS AND FORECAST
CITY OF PORTLAND AND PORTLAND URBAN AREA
1920 - 1975
AT T H E ENDOF THE WAR
OF THE EXPANSION
IN E S T A B L I S H E D
OFITS
INDUSTRIES AND
II A N D F I G U R E
TREND
IN P O R T L A N D
YEARS
1900 TO 1975.
PARED
BY THEPORTLAND
AND THE PORTLAND
IN G E N E R A L .
YEARS
PLANNING
THELARGEST
PORTLAND
ANALYSIS
STUDY
CHANGES
DATA
AREA
WERE
IS S H O W N
POPULATION
WAS PRE-
GAINS FOR
IN T H E S U B U R B A N
DERIVED
PUBLISHED
FROM
LIMITS.
RIVER.
PERIOD.
ESTABLISHMENTS.
CENSUS
BY THEBUREAU
THE CITY
BOTH
CHANGES
ON FIGURE
ON THEMAP, POPULATION
10 YEAR
FOR THE
COMMISSION.
OF POPULATION
IS S H O W N
WILLAMETTE
FORECAST
1 950
393,000
422 ,000
600,000
1 955
1 960
1 965
1 970
1 975
402,900
424,200
451,600
481 ,300
505,800
666,300
728,800
801,200
877,300
955,400
AREAS
SOURCE:
PORTLAND CITY PLANNING

JANUARY. 1955.
THE CITY.
AN
CINCT
CITY
AREA
5.
SIDES
STABLE
EXPANSION
OF INDUSTRIAL
IN F A C T .
CAUSED
THE
AND PRE-
AREA
LAND
AS
STUDY
HIGHEST
AREA
PER CENT
AS A W H O L E ,
INCREASES
A R E A S ON A L L S I D E S OF T H E C I T Y L I M I T S .
THE TWO LARGEST
INCREASES
OF THE
COUNTY
WEST
OF T H E W I L L A M E T T E
RIVER.
COUNTY
E A S T OF T H E W I L L A M E T T E
RIVER.
DURING THE
THESE
DECREASES
AREA
-9-
IN T H E P O R T -
OCCURRED
WITHIN
AND COMMERCIAL
POPULATION
COMMISSION,
THE
1940-
OF THECENSUS.
IN A L A R G E
RELATIVELY
THE
TRACT
ON T H EEAST A N DWEST
REMAINED
IN
PORTLAND
URBAN AREA
90,426
207,214
258,288
301,815
305,394
373 ,628
900
I 91 0
920
I 930
940
THE POPULATION
URBAN
THE 1955-1975
1940 TO 1950 OCCURRED
SURROUNDING
1950
4 SHOW
CITY OF
PORTLAND
YEAR
INDUSTRIES.
TABLE
THE
SHIP
CHANGES
BY P O P U L A T I O N
IS G I V E N
ON T A B L E I I I .
AREA
OCCURRED
DISTRICTS
IN W A S H I N G T O N
A N D IN M U L T N O M A H
A TABULATION
WITHIN
OF
THE STUDY
FIGURE 4
POPULATION TRENDS AND FORECAST
CITY OF PORTLAND AND PORTLAND URBAN AREA,
MEDIUM
ESTIMATE,
19001975
19501975
1000
1000
900
900
800
800
700
700
600
600
500
400
400
CITY
OF PORTLAN
300
300
200
200
IN
TROUTDALE
BEAVERTON
^ O MlLWAUKllE
OSWEGO
O GLADSTONE
SOURCE*. PORTLAND
-^PORTLAND
URBAN
CITY
AREA
PLANNING
POPULATION
NOT
AVAILABLE
FOR YEARS
- 1 0-
1900 1930
1975
CITY
1970
Y E A R
COMMISSION, JANUARY, 1955
OREGON
I960
1950
1940
1920
100
1930
WEST L1.NN
00
POPULATION
FAIRVIEW
1 PORTLAND!
1900
POPULATION
THOUSANDS
500
IN
T H O U S A N D S
PORTLAND URBAN AREA

(INCLUDING CITY OF PORTLAND)
FIGURE 5
POPULATION
N O T E ! RED FIGURES: I.E. A-65421 * POPULATION
DISTRICT AND 1950 POPULATION
VANCOUVER
19401950 PER
N
CENT
CHANGE
TRENDS
FOR
IN
THE STUDY
COMBINED
CENSUS
L E G E N D
-
25 OR MORE
5 TO - 25
-1-5
TO - 5
+ 5 TO -1-25
+ 25 TO + 50
+ 50 OR MORE
-11-
TRACTS
AREA
AND
VOTING
PRECINCTS
1975,
TABLE I I I
PER
CHANGES IN PORTLAND STUDY AREA POPULATION

1940 - 1950
A 35 PER CENT
CENT
WITHIN CITY LIMITS

EAST SIDE
TOTAL
SOUTH CITY LIMITS TO S.E. DIVISION ST.
S.E. DIVISION ST. TO N. AND N.E. FREMONT ST.
N. AND N.E. FREMONT ST. TO NORTH CITY LIMITS
WEST SIDE
TOTAL
SOUTH CITY LIMITS TO S.W. JEFFERSON ST.,
23RD AVE. AND N.W. CORNELL ROAD
S.W. JEFFERSON ST., 23RD AVE. AND N.W. CORNELL
ROAD TO N.W. THURMAN ST.
N.W. THURMAN ST. TO NORTH CITY LIMITS
+
+
+
+
26
22
13
49
-f
E
F
A
B
C
EASTERN
H-113
+
+
+
+
J
K
93
90
64
114
39
36
T H E
1 9 5 5 - 1 9 7 5
1 9 4 0 - 1 9 5 0
C R E A S E S
W I T H I N
P L A N N I N G
P O R T L A N D
P E R I O D ,
T H E T R E N D S
F U R T H E R
A R E T O B E E X P E C T E D ,
M A G N I T U D E .
C I T Y
F O L L O W S
T H EC I T Y
C O M M I S S I O N
P O P U L A T I O N
D U R I N G
L A R G E
W I T H
E X P E R I E N C E D
S C A L E
I N C R E A S E S
L I M I T S .
WITHIN
NUMBER
DURING
NUMBER
A N D OTHER
STUDY
THE PERIOD
THAT
SHOWN
IN M I L E S
T O
T H E
POSITION
C I T Y
O F
GION,
WILL
5 0 5 , 8 0 0
B Y
TIONS
HAVE
VOLUME INAREAS.
DEVELOPED
IN
MOTORISTS
IN
POPULATED
VEHICLES
286,170 AND
NUMBER
MAY APPROACH
IN T H E N U M B E R
WITH
EFFECT
OF VEHI-
THE EXPECTED
AND PORTLAND'S
FOR A RAPIDLY
AREA
IN 1 9 5 3
REACHED
PER VEHICLE
AN IMPORTANT
AREA - -MULTN0 -
1940 TO 1950.
6, C O U P L E D
CENTER
IN T H E O R E -
COUNT I ES- - INCREASED 63
VEHICLES
STUDY
WILL
GENERATORS OF
METROPOLITAN
FROM
DRIVEN
AS COMMERCIAL
AREA
AREA.
INCREASE
IN F I G U R E
IS
TO T H E COMMERCIAL
IMPORTANT
BY 1975 THIS
T H E EXPECTED
AREA
SUBURBAN
TO GIVE
ACCESS
ANDWASHINGTON
INCREASE
-12-
EASY
OF REGISTERED
IS E S T I M A T E D
TRAFFIC
SYSTEM
IN T H E
DURING THE
IN T H I S
IN A L L O T H E R
OF THE PORTLAND
CLACKAMAS,
PER YEAR
LARGE
OF REGISTERED
S M A L L E R
O F A
F O R E C A S T ,
T O R E A C H
AREAS
REGISTRATIONS
THE
OF THE STUDY
A N D IN T H E E X I S T I N G
VEHICLE
CLES,
I N -
AREAS
FROM THE
POPULATION
VOLUME
DESIGNED
500,000.
D U R I N G
EXPECTED
TRAFFIC
CENT
ON INFORMATION
RATE.
THECITY,
INDUSTRIAL
PER
URBAN
PORTION
TRAFFIC
H A S BEEN
AREAS
PORTION
FOR THE PORTLAND
FREEWAY - EXPRESSWAY
EXPANDING
IT
P E R I -
S U B U R B A N
A C C O R D I N G
F O P U L A T I O N
I S E X P E C T E D
T H E 2 0 - Y E A R
REPORT
MAH,
FIGURES BASED ON 1940 AND 1950 CENSUS TRACT AND VOTING PRECINCT DATA PUBLISHED BY THE BUREAU OF THE CENSUS.
GROWTH
A R E ALSO
A 59
4.5 PER CENT
FASTER
THESE
GON
EAST SIDE
WEST SIDE
FROM
A T AN EVEN
THE 1950 LEVEL.
COMMISSION,
COUNTY
YEARS.
THE
TOTAL PORTLAND STUDY AREA
OD
GROW
AND
+ 88
+ 111
+ 60
PLANNING
TO INCREASE
TWENTY
THIS
P O P U L A T I O N
COUNTY
THE
EAST SIDE
TOTAL
MULTNOMAH COUNTY
CLACKAMAS COUNTY
WEST SIDE
TOTAL
MULTNOMAH COUNTY
CLACKAMAS COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
IF
1 9 5 0 TO 1975. BASED
NEXT
CREASES
OVER
IS A N T I C I P A T E D
MULTNOMAH
EXPECTED
SUBURBAN AREA OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS
NOTE:
FROM
MULTNOMAH
PER CENT
CHANGE
POPULATION
DISTRICT
AREA
INCREASE
INCREASE
GROWING RE-
ON TRAFFIC
DURING
FUTURE
CONDIYEARS.
FIGURE 6
TOTAL VEHICLE REGISTRATIONS, 1938 TO 1975
MULTNOMAH COUNTY & THREE COUNTY AREA ( MULTNOMAH, WASHINGTON & CLACKAMAS)
PROJECTION
1953 1975
600
600
500
500
400
400
200
200
VEHICLE
MULTNOMAH
COUNTY
100
SOURCE; 1938-1953
1953-1975
DATA FROM
PROJECTION
MOTOR VEHICLE
DIVISION,
BY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
SECRETARY
-13-
OF
STATE
1975
1970
1965
I960
1955
1950
1945
1940
1936
I 00
YEAR
THOUSANDS
300
WASHINGTON 8
CLACKAMAS COUNTIES
R E G I S T R A T I O N S IN
300
VEHICLE
R E G I S T R A T I O N S IN
THOUSANDS
TOTAL THREE COUNTY

AREA
FIGURE 7
INDEX OF AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC AT FIVE PORTLAND LOCATIONS
(BURNSIDE BRIDGE, N. GREELEY ST. & PORTLAND BLVD., N.W. 19th
& LOVEJOY ST, S.E. 50th AVE, FOSTER RD. & POWELL BLVD. &
N. E. FREMONT ST. & UNION AVE.)
400
300
300
200
200
50
I N D E X
OF
50
DATA
NOT
AVAILABLE
FOR 1946, 1947 a 1948
.14.
1975
1970
1965
I960
955
1950
1945
1940
19361
1955-1975 PROJECTION BASED ON ESTIMATED INCREASES IN PORTLAND URBAN AREA

POPULATION, VEHICLE USE, a NUMBER OF VEHICLES
PER 100 PERSONS
= 1 0 0
D T
=
1955 A O T
A V E R A G E
I 00
I N D E X
OF
100
PROJECTION
AlSSUMING NORMAL GROWTH
AND BETTERMENT OF STREET
FACILITIES
LEVELING
DUE
TO CONGESTION
1955
POSTWAR
INCREASES
100
GAS
RATIONING
D A I L Y
FREWAR
INCREASE
A V E R A G E
D A I L Y
T R A F F I C
T R A F F I C
(1955 = 100)
400
VOLUME
FIGURE
THE
7.
AREA
FROM
A T FIVE
INDICATED.
TYPICAL
FACT
THIS
TRAFFIC
AT SEVERAL
SUCH
ROUTES
VOLUME
CONGESTION
AND THE TRAFFIC
TENDS
TO STABILIZE
TRAFFIC
DURING
OF TRAFFIC
STREET
CAPACITY
A
VOLUME
WERE
PICTURE
FROM
REASONABLY
OF TRAFFIC
BY THE
CAPACI-
TEND
TO SEEK N E W
LOCATIONS
T H E PROJECTION
MIGHT
50
50
S.W. HARBbR DRIVE SOUTH

S.W. MARKET STREET
40
30
30
OF
BE EXPECTED
IF
UJ
ADEQUATE.
TRENDS
AT TWO LOCATIONS
MCRE
SIGNIFICANT
INCREASES
I94G
EXPERIENCED
BRIDGE
20
1937
HAVE
ISLAND
20
10
WHICH
OF
40
ROSS
1955TO 1975SHOWS THE
WHICH
60
IN T H E I N D E X .
AT CONGESTED
AT CAPACITY.
THE PERIOD
LEVEL
MOTORISTS
IS
VOLUME--NOT
STREET
INCLUDED
VOLUME
REFLECTS
CAUSED
WASAPPROACHING
OCCURS,
ON
OFF OF TRAFFIC
AREAWAS
OF T H E LOCATIONS
IS S H O W N
60
FOR THE YEARS
OF TRAFFIC
STUDY
OF
TO 1950.
STABILIZING
INDEX
ACCURATELY
A LEVELING
IN
AND COMMER-
LOCATIONS
TRAFFIC
PRIOR
OF THE PORTLAND
THAT
WHEN
DAILY
HOWEVER,
TO AREA
A COMPOSITE
T H E INDEX
FOR T H EYEARS
AREA
IN P O P U L A T I O N
PORTLAND
IN A V E R A G E
1950-1955,
FROM
ACTIVITY.
IN G E N E R A L ,
CHANGES
STUDY
TY
THECHANGES
AND INDUSTRIAL
TRAFFIC
VARY
FIGURE 8
TREND OF AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
ON ROSS ISLAND BRIDGE 8 S.W. HARBOR DRIVE
SOUTH OF S.W. MARKET STREET,
IN T H E
IN
1954
CIAL
WITH
WILL
VOLUMES
1950
ACCORDANCE
AREA
OF TRAFFIC
1945
STUDY
OF GROWTH
THOUSANDS
PORTLAND
RATE
AREA
IN
THE
- STUDY
T R A F F I C
ANDFORECASTS
DAILY
TRENDS
A V E R A G E
TRAFFIC
I 0
Y E A R
TRAFFIC
VOLUME
DURING
T H E PAST
YEARS
IS S H O W N
ON FIGURE
$ NOT AVAILABLE
8.
INCREASED
RESULTED
AREAS
GAINS.
FEW
TRAFFIC
IN P A R T
WHICH
CONGESTION
FROM
LEVELING
ON T H E ROSS
DURING
PEAK
ON T H E ROSS
ISLAND
ITS U S E AS AN ACCESS
ARE EXPERIENCING
SOME
YEARS
VOLUMES
OFF OF TRAFFIC
ISLAND
HOURS.
TO EAST
SIGNIFICANT
BRIDGE
AN
EVEN
MORE
OCCURRED
T H E PAST
HAS RESULTED
AS SHOWN
SIDE
RESIDENTIAL
DURING
1939-1946 INCLUSIVE
BRIDGE
USE
SIGNIFICANT
ON S.W. HARBOR
AS AN EXPRESSWAY
FROM
MOTORISTS
FROM
ON THE CHART,
MOTORISTS
FROM
1 5-
INCREASE
DRIVE.
ROUTE
RAPIDLY
INTO
GROWING
THEEXPANDING
IN T R A F F I C
THIS
RESULTS
THECITY
EAST
AREAS
VOLUME HAS
SIDE
FROM ITS
CENTER
AREAS
BOTH BY
A N DB Y
TO THE SOUTHWEST.
AT
27 "EXTERNAL
SHOWED
FIGURE
1946-1955.
IN
( YEAR OF PROJECT COMPLETION
ENTERING
300
TOTAL TRAFFIC-
200
150
150
NORMAL TRAFFIC
GROWTH
J00
100
ENTERING
VAILING
TO
CURRENT
POSES
A
BINED
ADT
CF
THE
REVIEW
OF VEHICULAR
RIVER
PORTLAND
THESE
VOLUME
LAST
VEHICLES
OF
OCCUR.
THIS
FORECASTED
IN 1 9 4 6 A N D 1 3 8 , 1 0 0
THE AREA
PORTLAND
FACTOR
VOLUMES
REPORT,
EXISTING
TO
GROWTH
AREAS,
WHICH
IS
IT H A S B E E N
ARTERIAL
AND MAJOR
INCREASE
IT
DIFFICULT
C A N BE USED
DAY TRAFFIC
DOUBLING
PATTERNS PRE-
TO
THE 1975 LEVEL.
HOWEVER,
VEHI-
IN 1 9 5 5 .
PRESENT
THE INCREASED
TRAFFIC
OF
THUS
BRIDGES
EIGHT
BRIDGES
184,504
WITHIN
IN
VEHICLES.
ON
THE SAME
40 PER CENT
TEN YEARS.
VOLUME
FOR THE PERIOD
FOR ALL VEHICLES
257,200;
91.562
STREET
TRAFFIC
IN P O R T L A N D
URBAN
U S E OF T H E MOTOR
FOR PUR-
ASSUMED
VOLUMES
OF NORMAL
EXPAND
BY
THAT
1975 ON
SYSTEM
IS B A S E D
AREA
WILL
ON THE
POPULATION
VEHICLE.
50
5
10
15
NUMBER OF YEARS SUBSEQUENT TO C O M P L E T I O N
PORTLAND F R E E W A Y - E X P R E S S W A Y SYSTEM
WILLAMETTE
MADE.
STATIONS"
TRENDS
AND FORECASTS--FREEWAY-EXPRESSWAY
VOLUMES
ON
THE PROPOSED
SYSTEM
PORTLAND
WAS
PERIOD
CORDON
FOR
OF THE DIFFERENT
SINGLE
OF THIS
DOUBLING
THE
THE AREA
AND LEAVING
TRAFFIC
20
FREEWAY-EXPRESSWAY
FASTER
STUDY
INCREASES
ON THE
THE
CORPORATE
1946-1955
INCLUSIVE
1946 CARRIED
YEARS
BEEN
RATE.
A COM-
INCREASE
OF TRAFFIC
EXPECTED
TO
WAS REALIZED
VOLUME
BE
BE
USE.
IN
THE
INCREASE
MIGHT
THAT
ITSELF
INDICATES
BE
WOULD
EXPAND
TO
ABOVE
H A S BEEN
WOULD
IS E S T I M A T E D
VOLUMES
THE LEVEL
SYSTEM
DIVIDED
OF
AT A
TRAFFIC
THE FIRST
OF COMPARISON,
PROJECT
THE EFFECT
FREEWAY-EXPRESSWAY
TRAFFIC
IT
TRAFFIC
ILLUSTRATE
DURING
FOR PURPOSES
THE ENTIRE
COMPLETION.
THE GROWTH
EXPECTED
USE AT ONE TIME.
150 PER CENT
TOTAL
-16-
WHICH
ASSUMED
AFTER
FIGURE
OF OPERATION.
PUBLIC
THE 1955 PROJECTED

IS
SYSTEM
OF
VOLUMES
LIMITS
IN T H E 1 0 - Y E A R
ACCOUNTED
IN T H E V A R I O U S
DERIVE
AND
TRAFFIC DIVERTED TO
SYSTEM OR EXISTING
AT TIME 0F OPENING
AND LEAVING
TRAFFIC
EIGHT
THE 1946 SURVEY
THE 27 "EXTERNAL
AREA
BECAUSE
INDEX OF A V E R A G E
DAILY
TRAFFIC
( Y E A R OF PROJECT COMPLETION =100)
250
250
om
INCREASE
INCLUSIVE.
THE PORTLAND
CLES
INDEX OF AVERAGE DAILY T R A F F I C

( Y E A R OF PROJECT COMPLETION =100)
PER CENT
FROM
= 100 )
300
50
51
STATIONS"
INDEX OF AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC

ON THE PROPOSED PORTLAND FREEWAY-EXPRESSWAY SYSTEM
200
CORDON
ON
OF
IT H A S
BE OPENED
THAT
20
THE SYSTEM
TO
YEARS
WOULD
YEAR
OF
OF THE ESTABLISHMENT
OF
ON
INTO
THE FIRST
20
TRAFFIC
FOUR
PATTERNS.
COMPONENTS
AS
SHOWN
ON F I G U R E
1 .
9.
THESE
TRAFFIC
ISTING
THIS
DIVERTED
ON T H E
VOLUME
COMPUTING
2.
HAS
THE
VOLUME
WHICH
INCREASES.
AND
FIT
MIGHT
AS
ASSUMING
TRAFFIC
TRIPS
NOT PREVIOUSLY
AND
TRIPS
MADE
DIFFERENT
BECAUSE
OF
OF
AVAILABLE
YEARS
MAY
NEW
MADE
WERE
OTHER
COUNTRY
THE
CREASE
RANGE
TRAFFIC
TO
DURING
OPENING.
FREEWAY-EXPRESSWAY
UP
FOR
SYSTEM
30
THE
THE
AN
USED
NEW
OF
FOR
AS THE
THE
SYSTEM
LIMITED
AND
THAT
GEN-
PER
CENT
FIRST
FEW
PORTLAND
INCREASE
ADJACENT
HAD
NOT THE
BY
THE
NEW
IT
INFLUENCE
SYSTEM
OF
DUE
LAND
WHICH
CONSTRUCTED.
TO
IM-
OVER
AND
WOULD
HAVE
HIGHWAY
SYS-
IS T H E
OF
THE
VOLUME
FREEWAY-
ON T H E D E T E R M I N A T I O N
NEW
INDUSTRIAL
CENTERS. HOUSING
OF
OF
-17-
COULD
ESTIMATE.
PROJECTION
VOLUME
AND
OF
PLANTS.
RECREATIONAL
OVER
PROJECTION
INTENSIVE
IN A R E A S
FACTOR
FOR
THE
IN-
ON T H E F R E E W A Y - E X P R E S S W A Y
THE 20TH YEAR
DEVELOPMENT
OF 3 . 0 0
WERE
TO
IS T H A T
DEVELOPMENT
LOCATION
TRAFFIC
WAY-EXPRESSWAY
PREVIOUSLY
ATTRIBUTABLE
BEEN
TRAFFIC
IN T R A F F I C
TIAL
INDICATE
PLACE
ASSUMED.
DEVELOPMENTS.
UP
FREEWAYS
TAKEN
RETAIL
POSSIBILITY
BUT
THE
EX-
FACILITIES
DESTINATIONS
ABOVE
THE
THAT
BY A N Y M O D E
ON
USE
PORTLAND
OF
PROVEMENTS
EXPRESSWAY
BENE-
OF T R I P S
TRAFFIC
CAUSED
SYSTEM.
ON
IS M A D E
THAT
FOR
IN T H E
TRAFFIC
AFTER
BE
INCREASES
TOTAL
VEHICLE
BEEN
DEVELOPMENT
TEM
EXPECTED
ITS A T T R A C T I V E N E S S .
EXPRESSWAYS
IN
TEM. 2.50
IF T H E
IT
TRAVEL
TO THE
IN
POPULATION
GROWTH
CONSISTS
ONLY
SHIFTED
4.
REACHED.
AVAILABLE.
ERATED
OF
CONGESTION
WERE
VOLUME
BE
OR W I T H O U T T H E
BE M A D E
DATA
INCREASE
MOTOR
THIS
WOULD
TO
BASE
FREEWAY-EXPRESSWAY
IS N O T
GENERATED
IS T H E
RESULT
WITH
EX-
OPENING.
AS THE
NORMALLY
THE
COMPLETE
STREETS
OF
OR
20 PER C E N T H A S
TRAFFIC.
INCREASED
THE
SYSTEM.
USED
GROWTH
TO O C C U R
OF
THE
FOLLOWS:
AT TIME
BEEN
OWNERSHIP.
PECTED
ARE AS
INDEX OF
TRAFFIC
DEVELOP
TO
SYSTEM
NORMAL
TO
3.
COMPONENTS
THE
1ST Y E A R .
FACTOR.
SYS-
HAS
BECAUSE
BEEN
OF
THE
I N D U S T R I A L - C O M M E R C I A L -RES I DEN WITH
EASY ACCESS
SYSTEM,
A HIGH
TRAFFIC
POSSIBLY
RESULT
FOR
TO T H E
PROJECTION
THE 20 YEAR
FREEFACTOR
PERIOD
OF
PRESENT USE OF STREET AND HIGHWAY NET

1955 TRAFF1C
FLOW
THE
LANE
1955 TRAFFIC
GRAPHIC
INDICATION
AS THEY
PRESENTLY
AND
VICINITY
FIC.
ONLY
WITH
OF T H EMAGNITUDE
STATE
AN APPRECIABLE
BUSINESS
TIVELY
HIGHWAYS
VOLUME
OF TRAFFIC
DISTRICTS
ANDARTERIAL
STREETS
A R E SHOWN
MADE
IN T H E W E S T
SIDE
CONCENTRATION
A N D IS N O T G E R M A N E
PREVAILING
ROADWAY
TO SHOW T H E
PERHOUR,
(AVERAGE
DAILY
SIDE
WHAT
HOUR.
IS IN A R E L A -
ADT
TO T H E OVER-ALL
OF THAT
EQUAL
ANY
IT C A N B E R E A D I L Y
HIGHWAYS
WHICH
DRIVE
CARRYING
HAVE
AS WILL
OF RECENT
IN T H E C I T Y
T H E LEVEL
TIVENESS
HIGHWAY
COMPUTED
MANUAL."
THESTREETS AND
IMPROVED
VOLUMES
TO A
A N DT H EMORE
USING
STANDARD
RUNNING
OPERATOR
CONCENTRATIONS OF
OPERATE.
O U TTHAT T H E
ITSGREATER
THE
ATTRAC-
I T S U S E IS A C C E N T U A T E D .
CAPACITIES
BY THEU S EOF FORMULAE
BOARD
ON HIGHWAY
T H E TERM "PRACTICAL
THE
COMMITTEE
CAN
PASS
AS "THE
A GIVEN
POINT
ANDTABLES
CAPACITY
AND CONTAINED
MAXIMUM
QUOTED
HEREIN
PER
NUMBER
SPEED
STUDIES
W A SDEFINED BY
AREAS
GENERALLY
STOOD
THAT
O R IN A
THAT
DESIGNATED
PER
-18-
HOUR
HAVE
SPEED
BECAUSE
SPEED
ON URBAN
DEMONSTRATED
T H E SPEED
RANGE
IS N E C E S S A R Y
EACH
MOTOR
VEHICLES
NUMBER
RANGE
HE MUST
HAVE
WITHOUT UNOF
PASSINGS
SPEED
AND/OR
OPTIMUM
W A SSELECTED FOR
MULTI-LANE
FACILITIES.
THAT MOTORISTS
IT S H O U L D
OF BETWEEN
TO EFFECT
VEHICLE
IS 3 5 T O 4 0 M I L E S
RANGE
RANGE.
WITH
HE PREFERS TO
ON THE HIGHWAY.
THE SPEED
VEHICLES
ASSOCIATION
IN H I S S E L E C T E D
THAT
VOLUME
INTIMATELY
OF MOTOR
H I SSPEED,
T H E REQUIRED
PREFER
THAT AN
HOUR
IS
IN W H I C H
SLOWER
THIS
T H E PEAK
IT M E A N S
THIS
RANGE
TO PASS
CAPACITIES
OF A D T
OF T H E FACILITY.
TO MAINTAIN
THEREFORE,
CAPACITY
OF VEHICLES
A SPEED
WHEN
IN T E R M S O F
IN A P E A K
STUDY.
OF VEHICLES
OCCURS
UNDER THE
DURING
OF CAPACITY
AN INCREASE
THE NUMBER
COMPUTING
CAPACITY
DELAY.
WITH
HOUR;
RESULT
IS N E C E S S A R Y
OPPORTUNITY
CAPACITY
OF THEHIGHWAY R E -
CAPACITY"
ON A ROADWAY
WERE
WILL
UNDER
IN O R D E R
OR R E -
IN T E R M S
IS S O E X P R E S S E D .
THEOPERATING
SELECTS
INCREASES
DEVELOPED BY
IN T H E " H I G H W A Y
SPEED
REASONABLE
IN
HIGHWAY
WITH
BEING
T O D O S O IT IS N E C E S S A R Y T O
EXPRESSION
THE FACILITY
HARBOR
OF PORTLAND --POINTING
T H EMORE
A R E THOSE
OF TRAFFIC.
FOR THE LARGEST
ASSOCIATED
CAPACITY
COMMITTEE
SEARCH
THAT
FLOW OF TRAFFIC
BEEN
GREATER
OF DESIGN
TO TRAFFIC
THE
THE
YEARS
IS R E S P O N S I B L E
HIGHER
SEEN
THEMAXIMUM
ACCOMMODATE
TRAFFIC
AMOUNT
TO THEHOURLY
ANALYSIS .
IS D E F I N E D
OF THEA D TOCCURS
CAPACITY
HAZARD,
TO MANEUVER
IT C A N BE E X P R E S S E D
TRAFFIC).
DENSITY
CONDITIONS."
CAPACITY
PER CENT
WHEN
DELAY,
FREEDOM
ANDTRAFFIC
VEHICLES
KNOW
THETRAFFIC
UNREASONABLE
ALTHOUGH
ON THE
OR EAST
WITHOUT
TO THEDRIVERS1
STRICTION
IN P O R T L A N D
OF TRAF-
O N E HOUR
SO GREAT A S T O CAUSE
VOLUMES
FLOW
H A S BEEN
AS SUCH
AREA
THIS
OF TRAFFIC
NO ATTEMPT
CONFINED
OF TRAFFIC
AREACCOMMODATING
THOSE
CONCENTRATION
10, GIVES A
EXIST A N DT H E K E YSTREETS
THAT
ILLUSTRATION.
FLOW MAP, FIGURE
DURING
IN U R B A N
BE UNDER-
35 TO 4 0 MILES
PRACTICAL
CAPACITY
FIGURE 10
ALL VEHICLE
1955 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
PRESENT STREETS
AND HIGHWAYS
50,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
VEHICLES
-1 9-
PER
DAY
DURING
THE
THE
PEAK
SPEED
FREEWAYS
FROM
HOURS
IS C O N T R O L L E D
WHICH
WILL
MAINTAIN
MANEUVER
UNREASONABLE.
DELAY
OR RESTRICTION
DATA
WHICH
PRACTICAL
RESULTING
ALTHOUGH
IS S O M E W H A T
CAPACITY
THE
A LARGE
OF THE
RIVER
LANES.
T H EP R A C T I C A L
WHICH M A Y
251.500
VEHICLES
"UNREASONABLE
AVERAGE
DAILY
TO MA-
TOTAL
ON HIGH-
OF
OF SCIENTIFIC
HIGHWAY
SECTION.
CAPACITIES
QUOTED
FUTURE
GROWTH.
CROSSINGS
WITH
CAPACITY
AREA
USING
SLIGHTLY
A R ED E F I C I E N T
WERE
OF 3 6 TRAFFIC
OF THESE
F A C I L I T I E S IS
TO THE 247.200
T H EBRIDGES.
EXCEEDS
TOTAL
OR WILL
VOLUMES
IS F U R T H E R
IN 1 9 5 5
A TOTAL
P E RD A YA S C O N T R A S T E D
AS TRAFFIC
THIS
OF THE WILLAMETTE
METROPOLITAN
BRIDGES
TRAFFIC
T H EBRIDGES
NEAR
DETERMINATION OF
BY EIGHT
CAPACITY
BRIDGES
VEHICULAR
FREEDOM TO
FREEDOM
BODY
THE
RIVER
PROVIDED
COMMITTEE
A RATIONAL
F O RANY
PRACTICAL
THE
WILLAMETTE
IF D R I V E R S
THEIR
PHRASE
EXISTING
SPEEDS OF
IN D E L A Y S
THE
SUBJECTIVE,
POSSIBLE
CAPACITY
SAFE
TO T H EDRIVERS'
H A SD E V E L O P E D
MAKES
SPEED,
O F TIME
DESIGN
OBVIOUSLY,
SELECTED
BECOME
WAY
REASONABLY
PERHOUR.
TH5IR
PERIODS
B Y T H EGEOMETRIC
IS R E S T R I C T E D
NEUVER"
F O ROTHER
AFFORD
5 0 T O 6 0 MILES
CANNOT
ONLY.
ALTHOUGH T H E
TRAFFIC,
BECOME
INCREASE
SUMMARIZED
SEVERAL
S O IN T H E
WITH
NORMAL
IN T H E T A B U L A T I O N
FOLLOWING:
IN T H I S R E 1 955
PORT
WHICH
OF
INDICATE
CANBE ACCOMMODATED
T H EFACILITY
OPERATE
HOUR.
35
T H EM A X I M U M
H I SVEHICLE
WHICH
WITHIN
T O 4 5 MILES
UMES
WILL
WOULD
VEHICLE
WITH
CONDITION
COULD
VEHICLES
INTERSECTIONS
VEHICLES.
FROM
OR TRAFFIC
VOLUMES
THE
THEVEHICLES
A N D COMPLETE
AT GRADE.
PEAK,
TO BE
VOL-
HE CANSO OPERATE A N D
WILL
WOULD
BRING
TOTAL
OF THE SLOWEST
WHEN
QUEUE
THIS
STAGNATION
MOVEMENTS,
EXISTING
LAST
13 ,500
41,000
42 ,700
41,000
22,500
28,500
37,500
11,000
4
4
4
6
3
4
4
2
35,000
34,000
42,000
36,000
20,000
33 ,000
33,000
9,500
9,500
9,000
247,200
33
251 ,500
STATE AND FEDERAL

THE MAP
UP BEHIND
OF OCCURRENCES
MERGING
A.D.T.
NUMBER OF
LANES
CAPAC1TY
ON T H E HIGHWAY
SPEED
OPPORTUNITIES.
A N YNUMBER
THE
IN V E H I C L E
A L LVEHICLES
A T APPROXIMATELY
N O PASSING
RESULT
WHEN
ST. JOHNS
BROADWAY
STEEL
BURNS 1 DE
MORRI SON
HAWTHORNE
ROSS ISLAND
SELLWOOD
OREGON CITYWEST LINN
FREE TO
IS A S S U M E D
A N YINCREASE
IN V E H I C L E
WHERE
DURING
WILLAMETTE RIVER
BR I D G E S
SECTION
DRIVER
SPEED
LIMITS
PER DAY
CRITICAL
EACH
CHOSEN
T H ETIME
OCCURS.
SLOW MOVING
WITH
REASONABLE
A CONDITION
OPERATE
STUDY
A T HIS
INCREASES
OF VEHICLES
ON T H E MOST
P E RHOUR.
REDUCE
CONTINUED
ABOUT
UNDER
NUMBER
ING
OF TRAFFIC
INTERSTATE
AID PRIMARY
SUCH A S
ERAL-AID
DISABLED
SECONDARY
STATE HIGHWAYS
ACCIDENTS.
THIS
-20-
DEVELOPS
IN FIGURE
SYSTEM
SYSTEM
HIGHWAY
11 SHOWS
OF H I G H W A Y S .
OF H I G H W A Y S ,
SYSTEM
SYSTEM
IN RED THE EXIST-
IN GREEN
IN DASHED
OF HIGHWAYS
AND
GREEN
THE FED-
IN BLUE
IN THE PORTLAND METROPOLITAN

AN A P P R E C I A T I O N
THE FEDERAL-
URBAN
OF THE M A G N I T U D E
OTHER
AREA.
OF THE
STATE
FIGURE II
FEDERAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
1955
L E G E N D
VANCOUVER
INTERSTATE
SYSTEM
FEDERAL
AID
PRIMARY
FEDERAL
AID
SECONDARY
OTHER
STATE
TROUT-DALE
WOOD VILLAGE
-21 -
SYSTEM
SYSTEM
EXISTING
NETWORK
PRESENTLY
SERVING
ALLY
SIRE
FLOW
LINES
THIS
CREASE
THIS
OR
(FIGURE
IN
THE
IS T O
FUTURE
ON
AND
EXPRESSWAY
WILL
NETWORK
THE
OF
MAJOR
IF T H I S
GROWTH
RELIEF
OF
WILL
IN-
WHICH
SYSTEM
HIGHWAYS
IS N O T
WITH
WILL
OF
6 .
7 .
PORTLAND
8.
DIRECTIONAL
DESIRE
THE MAJOR
PLACE
ITS
SPECT
TO
FROM THE
PRESENT
AND
THE
PORTLAND
METROPOLITAN
LINES, WITH
AREA
1 9 4 6 OR I G I N - D E S T I N A T I ON S T U D Y
DAY
DESCRIBED
1.
USAGE.
AS
ARE
9.
FROM
FROM
4.
THE
DOWNTOWN
THE
GENERAL
THE
POINT
ON
RIVER
IN T H E
WARDS
5.
LINE OF S U L L I V A N
FROM
FROM
FROM
EASTERLY
12
THE
THE
EAST
AREA
AREA
SIDE
VICINITY
DOWNTOWN
AREA
FOSTER
THE
AREA
ALONG
AREA
CROSSING
NORTHEASTERLY
OF N . E .
11
TO A
16TH
TO
IN
OF
LINE
-22-
TO
AND
N.E.
47TH
AND
WILLALINE
FROM A
IS
OF
SOUTHERVICINITY
CONTINUING
VANCOUVER.
DESIRE
LINE
IS
PORTLAND
AREA
APPROX-
OF
IN T H E
N.
ST.
OF N.
LOMBARD
IN-
STREET
JOHNS
DISTRICT
PORTLAND
BOULEVARD
AVENUE.
A LESSER
FREMONT
THE
STREET
IN N O R T H E A S T
LINE
OF
LINE
MILWAUKIE
A LESSER
INTERSECTION
COMPARATIVELY
SIDE
FREMONT
TERMINI
FACTS
THE
THE
IN T H E N O R T H
THE
DESIRE
THE A P P R O X I M A T E
MAGNITUDE
DICATED
TO-
EAST
EXTENDING
AND N. D E L A W A R E
MILWAUKIE.
WESTERLY
ALONG
VANCOUVER.
VICINITY
AND
COMPARATIVELY
AND
TIGARD .
THE D O W N T O W N
TO
ALONG
TERMINUS
WITH
WILLAMETTE
SOUTHWESTERLY
RIVER
ON
RIVER
DICATED
ROAD.
TO
AND
TERMINUS
AVENUE.
THE
IMATING
SOUTHERLY
OF
OF
THE
SOUTHEASTERLY
OF
TO A
NORTHERLY
INDICATED
IN L E S S E R
GULCH.
LINE
DOWNTOWN
ALONG
AREA
NORTH-SOUTH
NORTHERLY
10
AREA
RIVER
A NON-RADIAL
LY
FOR
IN F I G U R E
NORTHWESTERLY
ALBINA
IN T H E
30TH AVENUE
DETERMINED
AND ADJUSTED
GRAPHICALLY
THE DOWNTOWN
ALONG
3.
RE-
FOLLOWS:
GENERAL
2.
SHOWN
AS
N.
TUALATIN
DISTRICT.
THE DOWNTOWN
METTE
DESIRE
OF
INTO
SKIDMORE.
LINES
DIRECTIONAL
AREA
DOWNTOWN
TERMINUS
V ICIN ITY .
MAJOR
THE
LINE
FROM
ROAD
THE W I L L A M E T T E
THE COLUMBIA
FREEWAY
AND
FROM
THE
THAT
TAKE
THE DOWNTOWN
IN T H E S T . J O H N S
EXPANDED
A
FROM
L I N E OF C A N Y O N
ACROSS
IMPORTANCE
FOR
COORDINATED
THE NORMAL
VALLEY .
DE-
OF
STAGNATION
VISU-
DIRECTIONAL
THE
AND
GENERAL
THE
PLANS
SYSTEM
TO
AS
HIGHWAYS,
SHOW
EXISTS
THIS
SYSTEM.
HIGHWAYS
ITS V I C I N I T Y .
DEVELOP
ADEQUATELY
RETARD
FEDERAL
READILY
PRESENTLY
IS D I R E C T E D .
EXTENDED
WHICH
THIS
10) AND
IT
THAT
AND
AND
12) WILL
SYSTEM.
STUDY
AND
UPON
(FIGURE
CONGESTION
STATE
PORTLAND
SUPERIMPOSE
TRAFFIC
OF
OF
AVENUE
AVENUE.
DESIRE
PORTLAND
FROM
PERTINENT
COMPARISONS
LINE
ARE
IS
ALONG
N. ALBINA
INTHE
TO
STATISTICAL
LISTED
HEREIN-
AFTER.
12.
A NON-RADIAL
INDICATED
NORTH-SOUTH
ALONG
82ND AVENUE.
PART OF TRIPS
A LINE
SUCH
DESIRE
BETWEEN
A LINE
BETWEEN
L I N E IS
72ND A N D
IS C O M P O S E D IN
OREGON CITY
AND VIA
US3O TO THE EAST.

13.
ANOTHER
RADIAL
DESIRE
IN T H E S O U T H E A S T
MATE
AREA
SERVED
VARD
AND S.E.
AREA
LINE
LYING
BY S.E.
DIVISION
IS I N D I C A T E D
IN A P P R O X I -
HAWTHORNE
BOULE-
STREET.
MAP
oF THE
CITY OF PORTLAND, OREGON

COMPILtD FROM OFFICIAL RECORDS
BY
THE
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLC WORKS

OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER
WM. A. BOWES -COMMISSIONER

BEN S. MORROW -CITY EXAMINERN
VEHICULAR VOLUME SCALE
50000
25000
15000
5000
MILWAUKIE
Figure 12 Major Directional Desire LinesAll Types of Vehicles
-23-
BASIC PLAN
THE
IN
PORTLAND
METTE
RIVER
PATTERN,
CENTRAL
AND
SIDE
H A S BEEN
RATHER
HOWEVER,
EXISTING
EGRESS
OTHER
MORE
IN T H E F O R M
A GRIDIRON
PLACE
AND EXECUTED.
STREETS
TO INTERSTATE
THE CONSTRUCTION
CAPACITY
SECTION
CONSTRUCTION
AS
A N DITS
EXISTING
THE YEARS.
IN
BOULEVARD,
E.
SIDERATIONONE
WITH T H E
RIVER
STANDARDS,
AND
HIGH-
THE
EXPRESSWAY
OF THIS
A THIRD
WEST
DESIRE
TIONAL
NETWORK,
A S IT H A S G R O W N
TWEEN
H A S BECOME
SOMEWHAT
OBSOLETE
THE
REPORT
IS Q U I T E
TREATING
WITH
FROM
OF ROUTINGS
HIGHWAYS.
BROUGHT
SIDE
CENTRAL
RADIAL
ROUTES
ALL AREAS
CENTRAL
IN T H E
GRIDIRON
TRAFFIC
TRENDS
SOUTH
WEST
PATTERN
DESIRE
POINT
THAT
LINES
BEING
TOTHE
ANDTHE
INTEGRATED SO
FOR PORTLAND AND

OF T H E AREA.
THERE
ARE SEVERAL
CAN BE GIVEN CON-
NETWORK
OF ALL TRIPS
DISTRICT
CREATES
WILL
OF STREETS AND
(FIGURE
THE NEED
EVIDENCED
BISECTED
FOR ADDI-
T H E FLOW BE-
METROPOLITAN
THERE
1 2 ) IS
A N D IT IS T H I S
ACCOMMODATE
DISTRICT.
OF DESIRE
DAY DESIGN
N E T , O N E IS A R A D I A L N E T
SIDE
PLAN
WHICH
BUSINESS
THAT
DEMANDS,
SYSTEM
STREETS
OF A PLAN,
IS A C I R C U M F E R E N T I A L
T H E FOCAL
T O ACCOM-
CONSIDERATION
FOR THE NEEDS
IS A GRIDIRON
IN T H E
THAT THE
PEAK
OF PRESENT
TRAFFIC
OR LOCATIONS
FOR MOVEMENT
APPARENT
-24-
CARE
STREETS
LOAD
INADEQUATE
OF MAJOR
ESTABLISHMENT
TYPES
OF T H E T. H. BANFIELD
THIS
WILL
GROWTH
OF
IT IS A P P A R E N T
BUT PRESENT
MADE.
THE RESULT
SYSTEM
AND TRAFFIC
T O GIVE
AN OVER-ALL
TO
COUPLED
BEING
OF A FREEWAY-EXPRESSWAY
BEGAN
STREET
STANDPOINT.
THAT
THIS
A N D IN L I G H T
OF A NUMBER
TO DEVELOP
VICINITY
LOADS
W A S
THE NORMAL
THIS
BECOMING
I T IS A D V I S A B L E
ESTABLISHMENT
DROP,
AREA,
FUTURE
DIRECTION
YEARS
POPULATION
ON EXIST-
O F PORTLAND
WITH
IS R A P I D L Y
N O T ONLY
W A S CONCEIVED,
OF THE COLUMBIA
HIGHWAY
CERTAIN
A DECIDED
GROWING
SYSTEM
THIS
IN R E C E N T
METROPOLITAN
STANDARDS,
DISTRICT.
DEFICIENCIES
A N D THIS
OF
STANDARDS.
THE
THROUGH
IN
EARLIER
IN T H E CITY
DEFICIENCIES.
T H E EVER
OF
EXPRESSWAY
HAS TAKEN
CAPACITY
MODATE
BUSINESS
SANDY
THAT
PRESENT
TO INGRESS A N D
STANDARDS,
OF N.E.
FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION
FREEWAY
DRIVE
CAPACITY
THE ROUTINGS
AND E. STARK
(US3O)
ABOUT
CENTRAL
WAS FOUND
SYSTEM W A S
IN T H A T
RESPECT
STREETS
PORTLAND
FORMS
THE INADEQUACY
APPARENT
WITH
TO FREEWAY
THIS
TRAFFIC
AS 194 1
N E T BECAME
STREETS
SYSTEM--BOTH
FOR THE LIGHT
HARBOR
WAY
OF RADIAL
(FIGURE 7 ) OF FIVE LOCATIONS
SURFACE
PATTERN
AND
THEREOF,
NEED
FROM T H E
RIVER THE
A RESULT
BURNSIDE
IT
OF THE WILLAMETTE
W A S TAKING
ALONG
GRIDIRON
SIDE
SIDE
EXIST
ING
OF
AS FAR BACK
CONVERSION
AS A
ROUTES
BY T H E TOPOGRAPHY.
STREET
OF THE WILLA-
BOULEVARD,
THE WEST
PLANNED
RADIAL
THAN
FROM
ULTIMATE
SIDE
N.E. SANDY
THAN
ADEQUATE
STAGNATION
TO
AREA
INFLUENCED
YEARS;
THE
NO DIRECT
ON THE WEST
REASONABLY
AS
11) HAS DEVELOPED
BEING
WHEN AN ANALYSIS
AND HIGHWAYS
(SEE FIGURE
HIGHWAYS
BEING
OF STREETS
ON THE EAST
THERE
DEVELOPMENT
NETWORK
AND VICINITY
WEST
WHEREAS
EXISTING
AREA AND
WAS. HOWEVER,
BY T H E THREE
NORTH
BY TWO EAST-WEST DE-
S I R E
L I N E S
A N D
T H U S
E X P R E S S W A Y S
I N T O
OF
A N D
I N
TRAFFIC
LEVELS
OF
B O T H
TRAFFIC
TO
THE
THE
TYPE
OF
FACILITIES
WILL
BE
150 PER
TODAY
(1955)
BUILT.
SUCH
BE
FELT
INTEGRATED
OF
TABLE
IV
TERIAL
WAYS
THE
OF
OF
OF
AND
LAND
DESIGN
THE
BE
GROWTH.
THE
NOT
OF
ACCESS.
GRADE.
SIGNALS
AND
CONTROL
OF
NO
NO
LEFT
NO
PARK-
TREATS
AND
THESE
BRIEFLY
MAJOR
OF
AS
BE
AT
BY A A S H O
AND
DESCRIBED
AS
THIS
TO
REFERRING
DATA
(FIGURE
THE
1946
EXPRESSWAY
ALREADY
AND
THAT
BEING
THE
T.
LEVELS
THE
SECOND
THE
SOUTHWEST
S U N S E T
-25-
ONE-WAY
TION
TO
PARK 1NG.
TO
THE
BY
PARKING
ROADWAY
MOVING
H.
DESIRE
THERE
BAN FIELD
H I G H W A Y
OF
AND
1955
WIDE
LANES
AL-
ENOUGH
IN
IN
AREA
THROUGH
INCREASING
WEST
ALONG
TO
NEED
ADDI-
FOR
THE
MAP
12)
FROM
IT
FREEWAY
AND
THIS
IS
CONSTRUCTION
OF
FREEWAY
ONLY
FLOW
STUDY.
PORTLAND.
TRAFFIC
NOT
(FIGURE
TRAFFIC
NORTHEAST
EXPRESSWAY
TRAFFIC
CHARTS
IS A D E F I N I T E
ACCOMPLISHED
AREA
LINE
METROPOLITAN
DEVELOPMENT
TO
FOLLOWS:
TO
SEPARATION
FOUR
BACK
THE
PORTLAND
AR-
CONFORM
THREE
10)
INDICATES
EXPRESS-
GRADE.
ALLOWED
MEDIANS.
IF
AT
OF
SERVE
STUDY,
URBAN
STREETS.
THESE
AREAS
TIME,
IS C O N S I D E R E D
OF
DESCRIPTIVE
BE
BE
THIS
CHARACTERISTICS
MAJOR
FOR
REPLACEMENT
OF
AS
LOWED
LEFT-
CONTROL
NOT
OR
LEFT
PARKING.
GENERAL.
COUPLETS
RAISED
WOULD
WOULD
STREETS
IN
GRADE.
WITH
CROSSINGS
CROSS;
OF
NO
INCIDENTAL
SOME
DEVEL-
FOR
REFUGES.
ACCESS.
WERE
AT
SEPARATED;
PROVIDED
ONLY
SYSTEMS,
THAT
ROUTINE
THE
STREET:
DEVELOPMENT
DESIGN
STREET
MAJOR
FURTHER
STREET
ANALYZED
TURN
JUDGMENT.
THE
MOSTLY
TURNS
IS
PURPOSES
SCOPE
CLASSIFIED
ADOPTED
SUCH
AND
WITH
WITH
LEVELS
AND
FOR
STREETS
WITHIN
THE
RATE
THERE
ACCESS.
INTERSECTIONS
BUT
BE
THERE
SYSTEM
GROWTH.
USED
ARTERIAL
SERVICE
FREEWAYS.
CAN
THREE
SHOULD
OF
BE
ARTERIAL
THESE
SUMMARIZES
DEFINITIONS
ONLY
THAN
GENERATED
MINIMUM
IS T O
1975
SOME
INDICATE
MEANS
EXPRESSWAY
NORMAL
EXPRESSWAY
NORMAL
HIGHWAYS
AND
REPORT
INTO
AT
NO
PARTIAL
YEARS
SHOULD
WILL
THIS
IN
REFLECTS
AS
A FACTOR
DEVELOPMENT
FUNCTION
WELL
AND
2.50
VOLUMES
TRAFFIC
FREEWAY
THAT
STREETS.
THE
TURNS.
D E S I R E
TWENTY
OF
NECESSARY.
MORE
CONSIDERED
FREEWAY.
CONTROL
CROSSINGS
T A K E
G R I D I R O N
SOME
FACTOR
TRAFFIC
INCREASE
AS
SUCH
FUNCTION
AN
THIS
IS
CENT
IF
TRAFFIC
IT
A N D
FUTURE
PROJECTION
RESULTANT
THE
R A D I A L
S H O U L D
COMPLETE
EXPRESSWAY:
THE
OF
V I C I N I T Y
FREEWAY :
F R E E W A Y S
I NG .
AND
DESIGN.
O F
DESIGN
SHOULD
A N D
T H E
USED
OPED
S Y S T E M
FLOW.
LOOKING
(1975),
P R O P O S E D
P O R T L A N D
C O N S I D E R A T I O N
THE
A N Y
STANDARDS.
GROWTH
CANYON
(u S 2 6 ) . B U T T H E P A C I F I C
IS
THAT
ROAD
H I G H W A Y
TO
AND
W E S T
(US99W)
DEFINITE
SIRE
THE
OF
(S.VV.
BARBUR
NEED
LINES,
FOR FUTURE
THERE
SOUTHEAST
A FREEWAY
SIRE
LINE
GENERAL
TWEEN
BOULEVARD).
BEING
BRING
IN T H I S
FREEWAY
TWO.
O U T THE NEED
AREA.
PORTLAND
OF N.
AREA
THERE
DEVELOPMENT.
THE
EXTENDING
SOUTH
FLOW
HAS A SECONDARY
DE-
SOUTH
LINE
AT APPROXIMATELY
WHICH
ACCOMMODATES
TO T H E EAST AND
VERY
DESIRE
INTERSTATE
AND VANCOUVER,
IS
FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT
ANOTHER
IS T H E N O R T H - S O U T H
LOCATION
IN T H I S
AVENUE
CIAL
IMPORTANT DE-
LINE
ALONG
IN
THE
DESIRE
VEHICLES
LINE
COMPOSED
TO POINT
N.E.
N.E.
THRU
BUT INCLUDING
THE STREAM
APPROXIMATING
(US99W) BE-
W A S H I N G T O N - -TH I S
LESSER
BOTH
COMPLEMENT
NORTH-
A N D S . E . 30TH
AVENUE
AND LOCAL
SUFFICIENT
A N D S.E.
82ND
AVENUE.
CHARACTERISTICS OF URBAN ARTERIAL HIGHWAYS

LANES
EXPRESSWAY
MAJOR STREET
DESIGN AND CONTROL FEATURES
FREEWAY
TYPES OF VEHICLES
ALL
ALL
ALL
CONTROL OF ACCESS
USUALLY NONE
FULL OR PARTIAL
FULL
MINOR CROSS STREETS
AT GRADE OR CLOSED
TERMINATED
TERMINATED
MAJOR CROSS STREETS
AT GRADE
PREFERABLY SEPARATED;
SOME AT GRADE
ALL SEPARATED
CONTROL OF CROSS AND TURNING

TRAFFIC AT GRADE
STOP SIGNS OR TRAFFIC SIGNALS
PREFERABLY STOP SIGNS;

SOME TRAFFIC SIGNALS
ALL SEPARATED
PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS CONNECTING

TO THROUGH LANES
RESTRICTED; SOME RIGHT TURNS

ONLY
NONE OR FEW
NONE
ACCESS CONNECTION TREATMENT
NORMAL OR FLARED
CHANNELIZED OR RAMP
TERMINAL
RAMP TERMINAL
FRONTAGE ROADS OR EQUIVALENT
USUALLY NONE
WHERE NEEDED
WHERE NEEDED
MEDIAN
INCLUDED OR ONE-WAY STREETS
PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS
CROSSWALKS
CROSSWALKS OR SEPARATED
ALL
PARALLEL CURB PARKING
RESTRICTED OR ELIMINATED
WHERE FEASIBLE
ELIMINATED
ELIMINATED
SHOULDERS
SELDOM APPLICABLE
INCLUDED
INCLUDED
-26-
OF
INCLUDED
INCLUDED
SEPARATED
FLOW.
COMMER-
PASSENGER
O U T ITS IMPORTANCE,
TABLE IV
OF FOUR
TRAFFIC
PREDOMINATELY
NORTH-
MINIMUM
ALONG
IS
CARS
THAT
THESE
POTENTIAL
FIC
TRAFFIC
PROJECTION
OUT.
WHEN
BASED
WILL
BE
ACROSS
CITY
THE
PLAN
VEHICLES
RIVER
THAT
IS P L A N N E D
COMPARED
WHEN
FUTURE
PROGRAM,
THEIR
DAY.
BRIDGE
THE
TO
64
NORMAL
ADDITIONAL
THAT
THE
WILL
BE
WILLAMETTE
FIVE
FIVE
64
NO
AND
20
CAPACITIES
RIVER
PER
DAY
OF
PRESENT
IS S U C H
DEFICIENT
RIVER
BRIDGES
EXISTING
BRIDGES
WILL
TRAFFIC
NINE
OREGON
THE
DISTANCE
BE
IN-
OF
THAT
IN
THEY
WILL
675,500
ALL
BUT
CAPACITY
ARE
ARE
MADE
AND
1955
NINE
THE
STUDY
AND
1975
USAGE
EXISTING
PROPOSED
OF
THE
PERCENTAGE
HOUR,
ARE
NOT
ON
EACH
A
AT
PROVIDE
WILLAMETTE
WILLAMETTE
RIVER
BOTH
THE
ST.
AT
THE
ENDS
UNLESS
IS
LESS
DURING
CERTAIN
-27-
ANOTHER.
THE
THE
FOR
OF
OF
THE
CAPACITY
OF
THE
THE
WITH
PEAK
BY
PEAK
BOTH
HOUR.
TO
EXAMPLE.
36.000
RESULTS
LANES
THIS
SIX
FOR
1975
IN
OF
NEW
AND
RAMPS
ARE
OF
COM-
RESULTS
67.000
MORRISON
BOTH
HEAVIER
DIFFERENCE
OF
INTERSECTIONS
CAPACITY
LANES
LANES
CAPACITY
RAMPS
THE
ONE
BRIDGE
THE
THE
WITH
TABLE
PROPOSED
OF
THE
FROM
THE
ON
THE
VARY
BURNSIDE
1975
STREAM.
TRAFFIC
THE
UNTIL
RAMPS.
DURING
NUMBER
FROM
THE
OR
SHOWN
LANE
THROUGH
THE
AND
CAPACITY
HAVE
THE
TRAFFIC
FACTORS
CAPACITIES
VERTICAL
FLOW
HOUR
ON
LANES,
TO
DIRECTIONS
THESE
BRIDGE.
FOUR
IN T H E
1975
LANES
INTERSECTIONS
OF
BRIDGE.
THE
UNBALANCED
PROPORTIONAL
INCREASE
ALTHOUGH
OPERATED
BETTER-
SINCE
THAN
BRIDGE.
FLOW
OF
TRUSSES).
VEHICLES
ADT.
CAPACITY
ENDS
OR
OF
WIDTH
OUTSIDE
TERMINAL
VOLUME
THIS
THE
OF
THE
STRUCTURE.
1955
FACILITY
CURBS
TOTAL
PRECISELY
PLETED,
VEHICLES
THE
OF
THE
TO
AS
COMMERCIAL
AND
TO
EDGE
POSSIBILITY
NUMBER
67.000.
IN
THE
ANY
LANES,
THE
(SUCH
THE
HAS
CONSTRUCTED,
ARE COMPLETED,
FROM
LANES.
LOCATION
CROSSINGS
THE
THE
THE
OF
TRAFFIC
REVERSIBLE
PEAK
BE
247,200
PROPOSED
OF
ARRANGEMENT.
ADDI-
AVAILABLE
AND
IN
THERE
BRIDGE.
FIVE
CAPACITY
OBSTRUCTIONS
BRIDGES,
TRANS-RIVER
BE
THE
EFFECTED.
DEFICIENCY
SUMMARIZES
BUT
THE
BECAUSE
RIVER
BRIDGES,
BRIDGES
ADDITIONAL
OF
ARE
BR IDGES .
NUMBER
WILL
BROADWAY
OF N O T O N L Y
BRIDGES
THE
CERTAIN
ROUTINGS
CAPACITY
ON T H E
MOVE
WILL
TRAFFIC
TABLE
THERE
FIVE
IN
SERIOUS
THE
TO
BRIDGES
LANES
A CAPACITY
GROWTH
EXCEPT
THAT
WIDTH
FACILITIES,
CONSTRUCTED.
LANES
AREA
METROPOLITAN
STRUCTURES.
ADDITIONAL
ARE
POINTS
STREETS,
EXISTING
THE
BE
IN
BETWEEN
ADDITIONAL
TO 33 LANES
THESE
MAJOR
CONTEMPLATES
USING
WILL
RESPECT
544,000 VEHICLES
PER DAY USING
1954.
THROUGH
NOT NOW
IT
FOR
TO THE
EXISTING
DEVELOPED.
DEMANDS
READJUSTMENTS
OF
TRAF-
1975.
DESIRING
POINTS
PRESENTED
AND
WITH
INDICATES
DAY
AT
ADDITIONAL
VEHICLES
MENTS
PER
IN A D D I T I O N
TRAFFIC
OF
STUDY
CROSSINGS.
TRAFFIC
1975.
OF
1975 AS
WHEN
OF
AND
RIVER
FOR THE PORTLAND
PROVISION
OF
BE SHOWN
SYSTEM
THE
TRAFFIC
JOHNS
OF
GENERATED
PER
IN
TWO
CREMENTS
THE
OF
NEEDS
STRUCTURES
THE
IN
THE
WITH
2.00 TO 2.50 FOR
FREEWAYS
PRESENTLY
ON
WOULD
EXIST
WILLAMETTE
AS
PROVIDED
IN
WILL
544,000
COUPLED
THE WILLAMETTE
AND ST. JOHNS.
TIONAL
OF
AND
ON
THE
OF
DEVELOPMENT
EXPRESSWAYS.
AREA
THAT
FACTOR
THAT
THE
LINES,
LOAD
STUDYING
POTENTIALS
YEARS.
DESIRE
CAN
BE
DIRECTION
FROM
THE
GREATER
WIDTH
OF THE PROPOSED
THE
CAUSE
OF THETRAFFIC
LOVEJOY
ON
BROADWAY
T H EROSS
ISLAND
BRIDGE
SIGNALS
ANDBROADWAY
MORRISON
BRIDGE
HASA LOWCAPACITY BE-
A T THE INTERSECTION
RAMPS,
WIDTH.
BRIDGE.
TO
FROM
40,000
OF THE
T H ENARROW
NUMBERS
LANE
AND
WIDENING
VEHICLES
OTHER
ANDT H ELOW 1955 CAPACITY
RESULTS
PROPOSED
INCREASE
VARIATIONS
BETWEEN
C A N BE EXPLAINED
OR BY THEIR
TRAFFIC
BRIDGES
WITH
EQUAL
BY THEIR
LANE
WIDTH
PATTERN.
TABLE V
T R A N S - W I L L A M E T T E RIVER
TRAFFIC
1955
EXISTING
BRIDGES
A.D.T.
NO. OF
LANES
CAPACITY
NO. OF
LANES
CAPACITY
REQ.
ADD.
LANES
REDISTRIBUTED
A.D.T.2/
CAPACITY
REQ.
ADD.
LANES
13,500
41,000
42,700
41,000
22,500
28,500
37,500
1 1 ,000
4
4
4
6
3
4
4
2
35,000
34,000
42,000
36,000
20,000
33,000
33,000
9,500
27,000
82,000
85,400
82,000
45,000
57,000
75,000
22,000
4
4
6
6
6
4
4
2
35,000
34,000
61,000
67,000
80,OOC
33,000
40,000
9,500
9
4
2
2
0
2
2
2
30,000
50,000
55,000
70,OCO
50,000
30,000
45,000
1 0,000
35,000
34,000
61,000
67,000
80,000
33,000
40,000
9,500
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,500
9,000
17,000
9,000
9,000
9,000
247,200
33
251,500
494,000
38
368,500
16
349.000
368.500
ST. JOHNS
BROADWAY
STEEL
BURNS IDE
MORRISON
HAWTHORNE
ROSS ISLAND
SELLWOOD
OREGON ClTYWEST LINN
TOTAL
1975
EST.
A.D.T.
1/
PROPOSED
BRIDGES
FREMONT
MT. HOOD
SELLWOOD
OSWEGO
OREGON CITYWEST LINN
8
6
4
4
80.000
65,000
30,000
10,000
95,000
80,000
44,000
44,000
0
0
0
0
10,000
44,000
TOTAL
26
GRAND TOTAL
64
195,000
544,000
307,000
675.500
0
2
1/ NORMAL GROWTH WITHOUT FREEWAY-EXPRESSWAY SYSTEM.

2/ TRAFFIC PROJECTION WITH FREEWAY-EXPRESSWAY SYSTEM.
-28-
T H E CAPACITY
P E R D A Y IN 1 9 7 5 .
OF LANES
ARRANGEMENT
WILL
THE
FREEWAY-EXPRESSWAY
THE
SYSTEM
FOREGOING
C A N BE BEST
SYSTEM
DATA
SUMMARIZED
STATE
T H E NEED
BY ENUMERATING
FOR A PLAN.
T H E TYPE
THESEVERAL
OF PLAN
PROJECTS
NEEDED
RECOMMENDED
A N D OTHER
RELATED
A N D BY REFERENCE
DATA.
T H E OVER-ALL
TO FIGURE 1 3 .
FREEWAYS
SECT I ON
NAME
F1
F2
F3
F4
F5
F6
F7
F8
F9
F1O
F11
F12
F13
F14
W I L L A M E T T E RIVER - FA I RVIEW
STEEL BRIDGE - PORTLAND -SALEM FREEWAY
HARBOR DRIVE FREEWAY - TUALATIN RIVER
HARBOR DRIVE FREEWAY - LlNNEMAN JUNCTION
BANFIELD. US3O
HARBOR DRIVE. US99
PORTLAND-SALEM. US99
M T . HOOD. US26
SUNSET. US26
INDUSTRIAL. US30
DELAWARE. US99
STADIUM, ALTERNATE US99-US3O
FREMONT. ALTERNATE US3O
LAURELHURST, ALTERNATE US99
EAST BANK
CASCADE. ORE213
SELLWOOD
GLENCULLEN
WHEELER AVENUE - HARBOR DRIVE FREEWAY

ST. JOHNS BRIDGE - STEEL BRIDGE
VANCOUVER, WN. - HARBOR DRIVE FREEWAY
SUNSET FREEWAY - FREMONT FREEWAY
STADIUM FREEWAY - BANFIELD FREEWAY
COLUMBIA RIVER - PORTLAND -SALEM FREEWAY
HARBOR DRIVE FREEWAY - M T . HOOD FREEWAY
MARINE DRIVE - OREGON CITY
PORTLAND-SALEM FREEWAY - LAURELHURST FREEWAY

BARBUR BOULEVARD - BEAVERTON-HILLSDALE HIGHWAY
EXPRESSWAYS
El
E2
E3
E4
E5
E6
E7
E8
E9
E1O
Ell
E12
El 3
E14
MCLOUGHLIN. US99E
M T . HOOD, US26
EASTSIDE
INDUSTRIAL . US30
OREGON CITY BRIDGE, 0RE43
WATER S T . , US99E
MULTNOMAH
COLUMBIA, US30 BYPASS
BARNES ROAD
JOHNSON CREEK
HILLSBORO
CEDAR HILLS-TUALATIN
OATFIELD ROAD
SUNSET-ST. JOHNS
STEPHENS-UNION-GRAND AVENUES - REEDWAY ST.

LINNEMAN JUNCTION - SANDY
MULTNOMAH ST. - MCLOUGHLIN EXPRESSWAY
BURLINGTON - ST. JOHNS BRIDGE
WEST LINN - OREGON CITY
GLADSTONE - 1OTH ST. (OREGON CITY)
CEDAR HILLS-TUALATIN EXPRESSWAY - PORTLAND-SALEM
ST. JOHNS BRIDGE - 122ND AVE .
SUNSET FREEWAY - STADIUM FREEWAY
LAURELHURST FREEWAY - MT. HOOD FREEWAY
WHEELER AVENUE - SUNSET FREEWAY
SUNSET FREEWAY - PORTLAND - SALEM FREEWAY
LAURELHURST FREEWAY - CASCADE FREEWAY
SUNSET FREEWAY - INDUSTRIAL FREEWAY
-29-
FREEWAY
MAJOR STREETS
NAME
Ml
M2
M3
BARBUR BOULEVARD
U N I O N - G R A N D A V E . C O U P L E T , US99E
BEAVERTON-HILLSDALE HIGHWAY,
ORE1O, AND BERTHA BLVD.
MACADAM S T R E E T , ORE43
MORRISON BRIDGE AND M O R R I S O N BELMONT S T . COUPLET
HAWTHORNE BRIDGE APPROACH AND
H A W T H O R N E - M A D I S O N S T . COUPLET
DIVISION S T R E E T
82ND A V E N U E
TUALATIN VALLEY H I G H W A Y , ORE6
122ND AVENUE
E . BURNS IDE STREET
HALSEY S T R E E T
MCLOUGHLIN B O U L E V A R D , US99E
POWELL BLVD. - FOSTER ROAD
15TH-16TH AVENUE COUPLET
OSWEGO H I G H W A Y , 0RE43
POWELL VALLEY ROAD
SCHOLLS FERRY H I G H W A Y , ORE21O
CORNELL ROAD
LAKE ROAD
C L A C K A M A S H I G H W A Y , ORE212
GRESHAM ROAD
SANDY B O U L E V A R D , US3O BYPASS
162ND AVENUE
M4
M5
M6
M7
M8
M9
M1O
Ml 1
M12
M13
M14
M15
Ml 6
M17
M18
M19
M20
M21
M22
M23
M24
THIS
COMMODATE
FLOW AND
AT THE
ELOPMENT
AND
THE
FREEWAY
ROUTES
THE
SYSTEM
THE D E S I R E
THE
AND
SAME
FREEWAYS
WAS
FOR M O V E M E N T ,
THE
OF
TIME
T O CARE
FOR
DESIGNED
EXISTING
BERTHA BLVD. - TlGARD

LOMBARD S T . - DIVISION S T .
BEAVERTON - BARBUR BLVD.
HAMILTON S T . - SELLWOOD BRIDGE
HARBOR DRIVE
SYSTEM
SYSTEM
OF
TO
AC-
TRAFFIC
NEIGHBORHOOD
DEV-
BY
RADIAL
EXPRESSWAY
SYSTEM
OF MINIMUM
INTEGRATING
ROUTES
FURTHER
COMPLEMENTS
ADDITIONAL
INTO THE
IS F U R T H E R
NUMBER
MAJOR
STREETS
VICE
A N D BEING
WAYS
OR EXPRESSWAYS
LEVEL
EXPRESSWAYS
GRIDIRON
FOREGOING
COMPLEMENTED
O F MAJOR
FREEWAY
39TH
AVENUE
WILLAMETTE RIVER - 5OTH AVENUE

21ST AVE. - POWELL VALLEY RD.
SANDY BLVD. - DUKE ST.
R E E D V I L L E - M U L T N O M A H C O . LINE
SANDY BLVD. - JOHNSON CREEK EXPRESSWAY
U N I O N A V E . - G R E S H A M ROAD
B A N F I E L D F R E E W A Y - 122ND A V E .
MILWAUKIE - GLADSTONE
P O R T L A N D - S A L E M F R E E W A Y - 82ND A V E .
LOMBARD S T . - M U L T N O M A H S T .
S E L L W O O D B R I D G E - W E S T LINN
82ND A V E . - G R E S H A M
RALEIGH HILLS - PROGRESS
CLACKAMAS CUTOFF - CARVER
FAIRVIEW - GRESHAM
122ND AVE . - F A I R V I E W
S A N D Y B L V D . - P O W E L L V A L L E Y ROAD
IMPROVEMENT.
SOME
IMPROVEMENT
SECT I ON
SYSTEM.
BY
STREETS,
COMPLEMENTS
AMETTE
RIVER
COUPLET
SUCH
OF TRAFFIC SER-
PROXIMITY
T H E NEED
SPEAKING,
OF T H E IMPORTANT
FOR A
T H EMAJOR
APPROACHES
IN T H E C E N T R A L
T O FREE-
EAST
HIGHER
STREET
T O THE WILLSIDE
AREA A N D
NORTH-SOUTH
ONE-WAY
ROUT INGS .
A
-30-
CLOSE
T H EEXISTING
BRIDGES
LEVEL
T O OBVIATE
GENERALLY
SYSTEM
F O R SOME
SUFFICIENT
IN S U F F I C I E N T L Y
OF DESIGN.
CARES
THE
GIVING
DETAILED
SUMMARY
OF COST
A S WELL
A S OTHER
FIGURE 13
PROPOSED PLAN
vV
VANCOUVER
1975
L E G E N D
TYPE OF FACILTY
COMPLETED OR
PROGRAMMED
1955,
FREEWAYS
EXPRESSWAYS
MAJOR
STREETS
TROUTDALE
WOOD VILLAGE
-31 -
PROPOSED
FIGURE
PROPOSED
N
VANCOUVER
1975
L E G E N D
TYPE OF FACILTY
FREEWAYS
EXPRESSWAYS
MAJOR
-31 -
13
PLAN
STREETS
COMPLETED OR
PROGRAMMED
1955^
PROPOSED
FIGURE
PROPOSED
N
VANCOUVER
1975
L E G E N D
TYPE OF FACILTY
FREEWAYS
EXPRESSWAYS
MAJOR
-31 -
13
PLAN
STREETS
COMPLETED OR
PROGRAMMED
1955,
PROPOSED
FIGURE
PROPOSED
vV*
VANCOUVER
1975
L E G E N D
TYPE OF FACILTY
FREEWAYS
EXPRESSWAYS
MAJOR
-31 -
13
PLAN
STREETS
COMPLETED OR
PROGRAMMED
1955^
PROPOSED
PERTINENT
TYPES
DATA
OF
RELATING
PROJECTS
CONTAINED
BENEFITS
REALIZED
PORTRAY
THE
TRIP
FROM
SON
STREET
TRATION
TO ANY
"1946
THE
WERE
USED
AS
TIME
WERE
FILES
SPEED.
AND
OF
SAME
THE
1975
WERE
WITH
THE
THE
BUREAU
MARKED
SOURCES
BASED
CASE
AND
OF
ERCE,
IS
FIC
IN
AVENUE
AREA.
FUTURE
THAN
ONE-WAY
AND
MORRI-
THIS
ILLUS-
CONGESTION
WOULD
ON
REPORT
IF
NO.
THE
ON
THE
FOR
OF
THE
SPEEDS
R O A D S . \/
BETWEEN
CAPACITY
FOR
ZONE
PUBLIC
THE
EXISTING
TO
BE
THIS
THE
AND
BEST
S.
ON
THE
DEPARTMENT
ROADS, WASHINGTON
THE
THAT
TIME
SECOND
1975
OF
OVER-
ASSUMING
SYSTEM
WAS
COM-
SYSTEM.
BEEN
ARTICLE
PUBLIC
IN
FREEWAYS
L.
REPORTED
IN
THE
ANGELES
FREEWAYS.
MINIMUM
BENEFITS
IN
THIS
LATTER
COM-
MORE
CONGESTED
FASTER
TO
STUDY,
URBAN
THAN
BENE-
THE
COST
THE
LOS
ANGELES
W.
OF
THE
AREAS
THE
WERE
FREEWAYS
"CALIFORNIA
CLUB
OF
4.2
CENTS
PER
ANOTHER
OF
THIS
THE
PER
VEHICLE
USED
FOUND
IN
FROM
STUDY
CITY
OF
ISSUE
OF
THE
PAY
LESS
YARD-
THE
LOS
INDICATED
MILE.
FREEWAYS
TO
VE-
STUDY*
1953.
DERIVED
OF
REPORTED
A "CONSERVATIVE
OF
HEAVILY
HIGHWAYS"
ARTICLE
GARDNER
CENTS
APPEARED
AUTOMOBILE
DECEMBER,
RESULTS
AND
OF
USED.
MOTORIST
TWO
THE
"SAFER
THE
DEVELOPED
THE
OF
THE
ARE
BY
FOR
ISSUE
SAVINGS
FREEWAYS"
SAVINGS
TO
WOULD
DIRECT
EXCEED
DEVELOPED
PREPARING
ENGINEERING/*
OF
ACCRUE
ALONE
THE
ENTITLED
WORKS."
WHEN
ANGELES,
STICK"
-32-
IN A N
HAS
INDICATED
OF
SYSTEM
JUSTIFICATION
IS A N
MILE
SELVES
THE
WOULD
$91,000,000.
FREEWAYS
CALIFORNIA
'TRAFFIC
C.
FREEWAY
CONSERVATIVELY
ECONOMIC
AND
"ECONOMY
VEHICLE
2 5 . D.
FOR
WHICH
JANUARY -FEBRUARY , 1955,
THERE
HICLE
LOS
OF
DETAIL
SOUTHERN
BY
COST
LEAST
DESIGN
IN
THE
BY AT
IN S O M E
BENEFITS
THE
SYSTEM
HIGHWAYS
OF
TRAF-
14 S H O W S
THE
ZONES
1955
CONSTRUCTION
AREA.
TIME
FROM
VERY
EXPRESS-
MAP
FURTHER
FREEWAY-EXPRESSWAY
WOULD
AND
AVAILABLE
BASE
EXISTING
IN F I G U R E
IN T H E
SHOWS
ALONE
METROPOLITAN
PURPOSE.
CONTOURS
U.
VOLUMES
NO
AREA
JUSTIFY
AND
SHOWED
ASSUMING
14
UNDER
OVERLAY
ECONOMIC
PORTLAND
THE
ACCORDANCE
T\H E S E S T U D I E S
FIRST
PROPOSED
AN
CONDUCTED
TIMES
EXPRESSWAYS
49-2
STREETS
IN
OR
THE
FITS
FACILITIES
VARIOUS
STUDIES
VEHICLE
MANUAL.
OF
REDUCED
VOLUME-SPEED
BELIEVED
OF
BASIS
AND
1975
FIGURE
EASILY
THE
BOARD
THE
THE
IN
FREEWAYS
IN
AVERAGE
PLETED .
ON
SURVEY,"
CONTROL
FOR
THAT
CONSIDER-
TRAFFIC
SPEED
PROPOSED
1955
OF
VOLUMES.
LAY
DRIVING
EXIST
CONSTRUCTED.
AREA
14
IN
14 S H O W
FREEWAYS
FIGURE
MAKE
FROM TECHNICAL
SPEEDS
TIME
BUREAU
AS
SYSTEM
REFLECTED
CHARACTERISTICS
INFORMATION
HIGHWAY
AS
STATE
OF
PUBLIC
ARE
AND
WERE
ASSUMED
RELATIONSHIP
.THE
1/
FIGURE
ANALYSIS.
TYPE.
OF
ZONES
TO
STUDY
SYSTEM
THE
WERE
RESULTS
SPEEDS,
MAJOR
PROJECT
SHOWN
FOURTH
DAY
METROPOLITAN
OF
KNOWN
OF
SYSTEM
IN T H I S
SPEEDS
ZONES
IN T H E
AVAILABLE
IN T H E
WAYS,
THREE
INDIVIDUAL
REQUIRED
PRESENT
ARTERIAL
- PORTLAND
FROM
TIME
POINT
BOTH
WELL
DATA
TIME
INTERSECTION
FREEWAY-EXPRESSWAY
ABLE
THE
VEHICLE
THE
SHOWS
AS
EACH
TO
ZONES
FROM
AVERAGE
PRESENT
TIME
TO
ONLY
HEREINAFTER.
THE
THE
BUT
NOT
FOR
IN
IN
THE
THEM-
CONGESTED
Jf
FIGURE 14
VANCOUVER
1955 TIME ZONE
CONTOUR
1975 TIME ZONE
CONTOUR
NO
STREET
IMPROVEMENT
1975 TIME ZONE

WITH
-33-
PROGRAM
CONTOUR
COMPLETED
10
FIGURE 14
1955 TIME ZONE
CONTOUR
1975 TIME ZONE
CONTOUR
NO
STREET
IMPROVEMENT
1975 TIME ZONE

WITH
-33-
PROGRAM
CONTOUR
COMPLETED
10
N
FIGURE 14
1955 TIME ZONE
CONTOUR
1975 TIME ZONE
CONTOUR
NO
STREET
IMPROVEMENT
1975 TIME ZONE

WITH
-33-
PROGRAM
CONTOUR
COMPLETED
*IO
10
AREAS,
EVEN
THOUGH
THE
PROPOSED
2.0
YEAR
PROPOSED
TO
AN
THE
THE
AVERAGE
HIGH
PER
VEHICLE
MILE
CENTS
PER
VEHICLE
MILE.
CENTS
PER
VEHICLE
MILE,
WOULD
BE
BENEFIT.
COST
OF
BASED
THESE
THE
IT
SHOWS
OF
$493,000,000
THAT
SAVING.
BENEFITS
ING
FOR
THE
MOTORIST
ACCRUE
ARE
RATHER
ALTHOUGH
ZATION
OF
NONE
TO
PROPERTY
BE
TO
THE
THAT
ON
THE
THAT
SHOULD
THE
GENERAL
LESS
TO
REAL.
VALUES
OR
EMERGENCIES.
SOME
STRAIN
OF
4.2
NUMBER
OF
$768,000,000
ALONE.
BUT
WITH
LOW
VEHICLE
WITH
STREETS
MILE
THE
FREEWAY
THE
OF
WAYS.
TOTAL
SYSTEM
THAT
COMPARISON.
NET
BENEFITS
QUENCY
BE
BENEFITS
ACCIDENT
EVALUATED
TERMS
OF
BE
REDUCTION,
AS
MONETARY
THERE
ARE
OVERLOOKED.
OF
EVALUATE
IN
AMONG
THESE
RE-
DIRECT
SAVMANY
THESE
COMMUNITY
MONETARY
TERMS
ARE
STABILI-
ENHANCEMENT
THEREOF,
-34-
THE
FREEWAY
CAN
THAT
ACCRUE
SYSTEMS
SERVE
THE
THE
IN
IN
WILL
BE
DECREASED
AND
THESE
INDIRECT
THAT
TO
WILL
SYSTEM
EXPRESSTAKE
SUF-
STREETS
EFFICIENTLY
CONGESTION.
BENEFITS
LARGE
ARTERIAL
AND
SURFACED
OF
OF
WOULD
EXISTING
MORE
AND
REDUCTION
STREETS
STRAIN
CULTURAL
FREEWAY
THEMSELVES
MOTORIST
FROM
TRANSPORTATION
THE
THE
DEVELOP-
DISASTER
ACCRUE
ON
EXISTING
REDUCTION
THUS
BE
TO
OR
OF
IN
IN-
ACCESS
ADVANTAGES
MAJOR
THE
ESTATE
TRAVEL.
WOULD
NOT
PROPOSED
FROM
TIME
BETTERMENT
WOULD
ALSO
IN
OTHER
OF
LESSENED;
FROM
TO
TRAFFIC
THEY
BECAUSE
BENEFITS
WOULD
AND
REAL
RECREATIONAL
TOURIST
MANY
FROM
MOTORISTS
THE
FICIENT
AND
ACCRUE
TO
ARTERIES,
INCREASED
MOBILITY
INCREASED
IN D R I V I N G .
BENEFIT
CITIZENRY
THE
AS
4.2
FREEWAYS.
NOT
INCREASED
RESPECTIVELY.
INCLUDE
CAN
FACILITIES.
SYSTEM
OF
BASIS,
THE
OF
LOW
DIRECT
GIVEN
USING
AND
TIME
SURFACED
RADIUS
DURING
BASIS
PER
PRACTICAL
NEIGHBORHOODS
FACILITIES.
OF
THE
TRAVEL
2.0
INTERESTING
HIGH
WHICH
DIFFICULT
THE
AN
ON
AT
ON
THE
MENT
NATURALLY
CONTRASTED
$91,000,000.
DEFINITELY
BENEFITS
AND
GIVE
CETERA.
BENEFITS
CENTS
OF
AMOUNTS
COMPARES
PROVIDING
WILL
COSTS,
INDIRECT
2.0
WHEN
FOR
ADDITION
ET
AND
AND
THIS
CREASING
OVERBURDENED
RESIDENTIAL
THIS
HIGH
EXISTING
4.2
$18,300,000
SAVINGS
FALL
DEVELOP
MILES.
THE
TOTAL
THE
AREA
THERE
OPERATING
USING
BENEFITS
PORTLAND
IN
TIME
ON
WOULD
OF
THE
OF
OF
FREEWAY
$38,430,000
1975.
$275,000,000
FOR
DUCED
BY
AND
ESTIMATES
THE
VEHICLE
FROM
PROBABLY
MILE.
AREA
BENEFIT
CENTS
$366,000,000
LOW
1955-1975,
ANNUAL
REALIZED
AND
RELIEF
DERIVED
WOULD
VEHICLE
ANNUAL
COSTLY.
BENEFITS
PORTLAND
AVERAGE
MORE
SYSTEM
PER
PERIOD,
762,000,000
MUCH
DIRECT
CENTS
FOR
WERE
FREEWAY
BETWEEN
AND
TWENTY
ACTUAL
PORTLAND
SOMEWHERE
CENTS
THEY
ACCIDENT
DRIVING
ARE
MANY.
SO
AND
FRE-
WILL
BE
RECOMMENDED PROGRAM
G E N E R A L L Y ,
S Y S T E M
I S T H E" B A C K B O N E "
SATISFIES
THE
THE BASIC
DESIRE
LINES
COMPLEMENTS
SYSTEM
OTHER
CHANGES
POSED
FINAL
PATTERN
THAT
WHICH
THIS
REPORT
DETAILED
INVESTIGATION
CERTAIN
AREAS- -SCHOOL
S U B -D I V I S I O N ,
MAJOR
FUNDS
THERE
WHEN
TOTAL
COST
STREET
AND EXPRESSWAYS
BASED
WITH
OF THE PORTLAND
DECIDED
B E CREATED
IS MADE.
LAND
FINAL
OFFICE
D I DN O T A L L O W
THE
DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT
COSTS
AREAS
BEEN
WILL
WITHIN
LOCATED
WHICH.
NECESSITATE
SURVEYS
WHICH
ARE MADE
JECTS.
WAYS,
FREE-
B Y REASON
RELOCATION
AND BEFORE
TOTAL
STREETS)
COSTS
OR WILL
(FREEWAYS,
$371,045,000.
$40,000,000
BE AVAILABLE
WITHIN
OF 291 MILES
IT IS S U M M A R I Z E D
OF PROJECTS
THE NEXT
OF IMPROVEMENT
OTHER
FIELD
FOR THE
LOCATION
WERE
AND DESIGN.
DEVELOPED
APPRAISALS
RESPECT
WERE
PUR-
PRELIMINARY
FOR EACH
PROJECT
OF RIGHTS
THE EXPRESSWAY
FROM
OF W A Y WERE
AND RIGHT
WITH
TOTAL
RESPECT
T O COST
FIELD
AVERAGE
OF W A Y WERE
IN
UNIT
USED FOR
OF T H E SEVERAL P R O -
OF SOME
OF RIGHTS
W A S UTILIZED
PLAN.
COSTS
IN T H E I N S T A N C E
APPRAISALS
SYSTEM,
FOR LOCATIONS
OF THE PRELIMINARY
BEEN
OF
THIS
AS FOLLOWS:
-35-
MAJOR
PRIMARILY
STREET
OF T H E EXPRESS-
OF W A Y AND DETAILED
WERE
SYSTEM
ON T H E BASIS
COMPARABLE
AVAILABLE.
T W O YEARS.
IN
RECONNAISSANCE
HOWEVER,
THE
AMOUNT
HAVE
AND OFFICE
OF DETERMINING
THE
EXPRESSWAYS.
OF THIS
SYSTEM
AVAILABLE
F O R
I N -
C L U S IO N I N T H E S T U D Y .
OPED
PROGRAM
FOR THE FREEWAY
RECONNAISSANCE
ESTIMATES
O F
ESTIMATES
FOR CONSTRUCTION
PURPOSES
BEEN
$371,045,000
OBTAINED.
AND
RECENTLY
2.037,682.000
FIELD
WITH
DEVELOPMENT,
290.87
AND PROFILE
PERIOD
PARK
$274,975,000
52.690.000
43 .380.000
PLAN
IN
COST
1,059,155,000
330,410,000
648 ,117.000
OF DETERMINING
DATA.
ANNUAL
V E H IC L E M I L E S
MILES
96.16
74.06
120.65
POSE
ALSO
P R O -
B Y SUCH
T H ET I M E
W A S PREPARED
A R E SOME
T O T H E
ON FIELD
THESE
A N D THEREFORE
T O CONFORM
WOULD
EXPOSITION-
C A N BE. A D O P T E D .
A R E A TOTAL
PROGRAM.
BY
NO.
OF WORK
SYSTEM
THE MAJOR
IT H A S QUITE
HAVE
FOR FINANCING
PROVIDED
WHILE
DEVELOPMENT,
DEVELOPMENT.
THE
AND
THERE
O R EXPRESSWAYS
LOCATION
AS EVIDENCED
THE EXPRESSWAY
O F POTENTIAL
E T CETERA.
THAT
HIGHWAYS
12.
M A YB E N E C E S S A R Y
WITHIN
THE
PATTERNS
H A S N O T BEEN
T H ES E L E C T I O N
PROPOSED
FREEWAYS
EXPRESSWAYS
MAJOR
STREETS
LOCATION
AFTER
OF
P R O G R A M A N D
SYSTEM
CENTER
WAYS
O F T H EO V E R - A L L
STREETS.
TRAFFIC
DETERMINED
TYPE
THE FREEWAYS
CENTER
R E C R E A T I O N
T H E F R E E W A Y
IN F I G U R E
INTER-TIES
ARTERIAL
THAT
TRAFFIC
THE FREEWAY
THE
SOME
I T C A NB E SAID
FIELD
W A Y ON CERTAIN
PROJECTS
OF UNIT
FOR WHICH
APPRAISALS
CRITICAL
WERE
OF CONSIDERABLE
MAGNITUDE.
WERE
BASED
COST
DATA.
COST
DEVEL-
DATA
INFORMATION
OBTAINED
PROJECTS
WERE
ON CURRENT
H A D I T S COST
WHERE
FROM
WAS
FOR RIGHTS
SUCH
ALL OF T H E
COSTS
ESTIMATES
COST
OF
FREEWAY
THE
UNDER
THE
PROJECTS
TOTAL
COST
$ 2 7 5 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 .
FREEWAYS
PROPOSED
FREEWAYS
IS
AS
OF
THERE
IN
THIS
THE
ARE
FREEWAY
A
SYSTEM
TOTAL
STUDY.
OF
96
SUMMARY
IS
MILES
FOR
SYSTEM
JUST
THE
FREEWAY
DO N O T I N
OF
OR
14
LOCATION
OF
FOLLOWS:
D E S I G N ,
LENGTH
(MILES)
2.54
1 .29
6.61
10.1 1
10.56
6.44
6.00
2.41
6.21
20.83
1 .86
15.12
3.64
2.54
60,262,000
32,560,000
1 04,087,000
102,364,000
94,509,000
59,057,000
82,161,000
63,346,000
58,163,000
213,368,000
1 6,973,000
127,356,000
31,043,000
13,906,000
BANFIELD
HARBOR DRIVE
PORTLAND-SALEM
MT. HOOD
SUNSET
INDUSTRIAL
DELAWARE
STADIUM
FREMONT
LAURELHURST
EAST BANK
CASCADE
SELLWOOD
GLENCULLEN
TOTAL
1 /
96.16
TOTAL COST
($)
BRIDGES
GRAPHS
AND
COST
M I G H T
C H A R A C T E R I S T I C S
COST
E S T I M A T E S
P L E T E
THERE
I N G .
N O
I S
O F
L E F T
FOR EACH
D E T A I L
C O N S T R U C T I O N ,
FREEWAY
WITH
W E L L
B A S E D .
T U R N S ,
FLOW
FREEWAY
T H E L O C A T I O N ,
RESPECT
T H E R E
N O
T R A V E R S I N G
S Y S T E M
S I G N A L S ,
THE
SOME
1 4
LENGTH
ON W H I C H
THESE
THERE
T H E T R A F F I C
A N D T H E R E L A T I O N
TO T H E TOTAL
E X P R E S S W A Y
DESIRE
I N
ON
T H E
O F
G R A D E ,
D I S -
REFUGES
I N
WELL
AS
OF
P A R K I N G
I S
I N D I V I D U A L
PROJECT
V O L U M E S .
TYPE
AS
SYSTEM.
-36-
BEEN
AREA
SOME
A S
O F
T H E
I N
PHOTOF R E E W A Y
D I S C U S S E D
A
D I R E C -
AS
FOLLOWS:
T O
OF T H E
STUDY.
COST
ON A
T H E
THESE
FREEWAYS.
E S T I M A T E S
P A R T I A L C O N -
I N T E R S E C T I O N S
S E P A R A T E D .
L O C A T I O N S ;
E X P R E S S W A Y .
A T
L E F T - T U R N
I ZATI ON A T C R I T I C A L
ON A N
W H I L E
S E R V I C E
C E R T A I N
SOME
THOSE
EXPRESSWAY
F O R T H E M A J O R
WERE
A T
T H E
TOTAL
F R E E W A Y
S E C O N D A R Y
WERE
O F
P R E V I O U S L Y .
OF T H I S
I N*TO
T H E
T H E R E
T H E M
M I L E S
S Y S T E M .
CARE
F O RT H E
S E G R E G A T E D
$ 5 3 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 .
BASED
O F
S E T FORTH
F O R 7 4
WERE
P R O V I D E D
I S
A S
S Y S T E M
P R O H I B I T E D
COSTS
G R A P H I C A L L Y
H A S BEEN
T O
T H E PURPOSE
S IGNAL
ON T H E
S U P E R I M P O S E D .
ACCOUNT
G I V E S
A C C E S S .
WERE
E X P E C T E D
P O R T I O N S
T H E F R E E W A Y
L I N E S
B U T MOST
C A N BE
S Y S T E M
D E S I G N E D
T H E E X P R E S S W A Y
T R O L
L E A V -
PRESENTED
OF EACH
A T
COSTS
1 8 A N D 1 9 A R E A E R I A L
A N D INTERCONNECTS
FOR
P A R K I N G .
E N T E R I N G ,
I S
COST
S Y S T E M
L I N E S
D E V E L O P S C O M C R O S S I N G S
HAVE
WHICH
W A S S O
D E S I G N
WHICH
PROJECTS
S Y S T E M
D E S I R E
L O C A T I O N
A P P R O X I M A T E
UPON
A R E P O R T R A Y E D
1 7 ,
A N D WOULD
FREEWAY
F I N A L
T H E
T H E BASIS
THAT
E X P R E S S W A Y
P R O J E C T S
R E F L E C T
R E F L E C T
ON W H I C H
SYSTEM
TO BE PAID FOR
T H E F R E E W A Y .
PROJECT.
1 6 ,
C O M P L E M E N T S
A N D N O
OF T R A F F I C
FIGURES
S Y S T E M
T H E
A R E NO
1 9 7 5
274,975,000
R E I T E R A T E
T H E FREEWAY
A C C E S S ,
COST,
T O
T H E FREEWAY
U N I N T E R R U P T E D
A N D W H I L E
CUSSION
SOME
WERE
C O N T R O L
G R A D E ,
OF
B E
VOLUMES
OF EXPRESSWAY
F O R T H E
D E T E R M I N E D .
O F P O R T L A N D
P O R T L A N D
DO THEY
B Y
EXPRESSWAY
DRAWINGS
INSTANCE
A N D WERE
WERE
S Y S T E M
1 5 .
T I O N A L
IT
A N D DESIGN
F R E E W A Y
7,175,000
5,140,000
11.510,000
26,030,000
17,070,000
24,500,000
24,200,000 1/
29,150,000 "
24,960,000
42,120,000
10,700,000
24,190,000
9,230,000
19,000,000
1,059,155,000
INCLUDES $ 1 4 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 FOR NEW INTERSTATE

THROUGH TOLL
COLLECTION.
EVERY
T R A F F I C
ANNUAL
TRAVEL
(VEH. MILES)
L O C A T I O N
B U T RATHER
T H E PROJECTS
F I G U R E
F1
F2
F3
F4
F5
F6
F7
F8
F9
F10
F11
F12
F13
F14
D E T A I L
A T
GRADE
HOWEVER.
SUMMARY
O F
FIGURE 15
ALL VEHICLE
1975 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
FREEWAY SYSTEM
100,000
50,000
30,000
20,000
;
1
VEHICLES
37-
PER
IO.OOO
DAY
EXPRESSWAY
LENGTH
( MILES)
ANNUAL
TRAVEL
(VEH. MILES)
2.25
12.00
3.90
4.25
0.31
20,531,000
30.330,000
32,850,000
23,269,000
1,132,000
250,000
3,945,000
7,550,000
2,800,000
3,500,000
1 .20
5.30
1 1 .70
4.50
4.70
1 .25
9,636,000
29,240,000
83,037,000
16,060,000
19,600.000
3,650,000
200.000
1,820,000
12,630,000
4,710,000
4,140,000
630,000
9.10
3.10
10.50
30,598,000
11,315,000
19.162.000
4,815,000
1,900,000
3.800.000
74.06
330,410,000
52,690,000
El MCLOUGHLIN
E2 MT. HOOD
E3 EASTS IDE
E4 INDUSTRIAL
E5 OREGON CITY BRIDGE
E6 WATER STREET
(OREGON CITY)
E7 MULTNOMAH
E8 COLUMBIA
E9 BARNES
E10 JOHNSON CREEK
Ell HILLSBORO
E12 CEDAR HILLSTUALATIN
E13 OATFIELD
E14 ST. JOHNS-SUNSET
TOTAL
TOTAL COST
($)
Ml
M2
M3
OF MAJOR
STREET
THE
STUDY
MAJOR
INTEGRATES
FOR
WHICH
THE
FREEWAYS
BUT
T H E MAJOR
THEY
R I V E R
STREET
T H E FREEWAYS
SYSTEM
T H EMOVEMENT
T H E MAJOR
A R E FEEDERS
TO T H E BRIDGES
A N D OTHERWISE
AS PROPOSED
A N DEXPRESSWAYS
TO CARRY
STREETS
ARE FEEDERS
M4
M5
M6
M7
M8
M9
M10
Mil
Ml 2
Ml 3
M14
Ml 5
Ml 6
Ml 7
Ml 8
Ml 9
M20
M21
M22
M23
M24
F U N C T I O N
WERE
LOAD
I N
BEAVERTON-HILLSDALE HWY. &

BERTHA BLVD.
MACADAM STREET
MORRISON BRIDGE & MORRISONBELMONT COUPLET
HAWTHORNE BRIDGE APPROACH &
HAWTHORNE-MADISON COUPLET
DIVISION STREET
82ND AVENUE
TUALATIN VALLEY HWY.
122ND AVENUE.
E. BURNS IDE STREET
HALSEY STREET
MCLOUGHLIN BLVD.
POWELL BLVD.-FOSTER ROAD
15TH-16TH AVE. COUPLET
OSWEGO HIGHWAY
POWELL VALLEY ROAD
SCHOLLS FERRY HWY.
CORNELL ROAD
LAKE ROAD
CLACKAMAS HIGHWAY
GRESHAM ROAD
SANDY BOULEVARD
162ND AVENUE
THE
OF TRAFFIC
USED
DESIGNED,
IED
TOTALING
IN C O S T .
SOME
121 M I L E S
THESE
330,000
1,915,000
7.21
1 .85
26,316,000
16,881,000
1,595,000
350,000
2.49
30,581,000
13,055,000
2.80
11 .72
5.19
8.10
5.90
11 .23
1 .35
5.20
4.80
3.10
7.90
4.10
3.50
7.14
2.35
2.55
3.40
5.20
3.85
19.600,000
53,472,000
36,825,000
32,240,000
31,500,000
77,068,000
7,884,000
37,595,000
52,560,000
28,543,000
31,865,000
26,097,000
11,461,000
18,214,000
8,580,000
3,723,000
4,964,000
12,921,000
7,026,000
3,435,000
1,985,000
195,000
1 ,465,000
2,205,000
2,295,000
1,315,000
200,000
500,000
1,610,000
3,060,000
980,000
860,000
2,500,000
475,000
575,000
730,000
850,000
900,000
648,117,000
43,380,000
120.65
OF
T R A F F I C
T O T H E FREEWAYS,
ACROSS
AS MAJOR
INCIDENTAL
CONTROL
AT
SOME
GRADE,
GENERAL,
T H E WILLAMETTE
TRAFFIC
D I S T R I B U T I N G
PROJECTS
2 4 MAJOR
IN L E N G T H
STREET
PROJECTS
AND ABOUT
ARE SUMMARIZED
FOUR
STUD-
WAS
$43,000,000
-38-
STREET
ALLOWED
ALONG
COST
A MAJOR
MEDIANS
DESIGN
ESTIMATES
STANDARDS
WERE
TO CROSS;
A R E IN O R D E R .
IS W I D E
PARKING
THAT
PREPARED.
H A S ONLY
CROSSINGS ARE
OR SEPARATION
IF T H E R O A D W A Y
STANDARDS
STREET
ARE NOT ALLOWED
LANES. OTHERWISE
THESE
DESIGN
OF ACCESS, ALL STREET
COUPLETS
BY RAISED
PROGRAM
BY SAYING
STREETS
ONE-WAY
MOVING
SYSTEM
WS FOLLOWS:
MAJOR
C A N BE PHRASED
GENERALLY
WERE
28,744,000
43,457,000
THIS
ROUTES.
THERE
4.85
4.87
BARBUR BOULEVARD
PROJECTS
ANDCOMPLETES
TEND
TOTAL COST
($)
UNION-GRAND COUPLET
TOTAL
COST
ANNUAL
TRAVEL
(VEH. MILES)
LENGTH
(MILES)
MAJOR STREET
OF
IN
OPPOSING
PARKING
IS
ENOUGH FOR
IS P R O H I B I T E D .
THE MAJOR
IT
STREET
ONE
RESPECT
TO
FIVE
TEN
OR
HEAVIER
THE
CHARACTERISTIC
USAGE
YEARS
THAN
IT
OVER-ALL
THEM
CAN
SHOULD
BE
THIS
WOULD
AS
THE
USAGE
BEEN
FOR
OF
OF
WAS
DOES
THE
ARTERIAL
AND
ARTERIAL
BUT
WILL
"KEY
ARE
PROJECTS
FERRY
ROAD
WOULD
INNER
CIRCUMFERENTIAL
IMPORTANT
ARTERIAL
EXTENSION
OF
CARVER
NEAR
CREEK.
TO
MARINE
AN
WHICH
IN
IN
THE
HAS
ARE
AND
COM-
THE
DISCUSSION
TREATING
AND
STREETS.
AS
IN
WITH
LOCATION
THE
SCOPE
OF
IT
OF
IS
CITY
FELT
OF
OR
WHICH
THAT
NORMAL
COMMUNITY.
FALL
AN
OF
PROJECTS
A MATTER
HEREIN.
INTO
SUCH
EXAMPLE
OF
PROPOSED
GOODAL-SCHOLLS
IN
WOULD
EFFECT
CONNECTING
AND
NOT
THROUGH
FROM
THIS
DIMINISH.
SENSE
BEEN
CIRCUMFERENTIAL
GRESHAM
DATE
WILL
PREVIOUSLY,
MULTNOMAH
THAT
OUTER
DRIVE
THE
ROUTE
HILLS.
EARLY
EXPRESSWAYS
COST,
PROJECTS
UNION
HAPPY
AVENUE
FORM
AN
NEIGHBORHOODS
OSWEGO.
ANOTHER
INCLUDED
ROUTING
VALLEY
TO
AS
AN
IS
FROM
AND
ROCK
TROUTDALE
IS
-39-
BUT
HAS
STUDY
IMPROVE
SUCH
AND
FREEWAYS
SECTION
DEVELOP
BE
CONNECTION
RALEIGH
THE
INCLUDED
THESE
EXPENDITURE
STREETS
PROJECTS"
NOT
TO
OCCASION
DEVELOPMENT
MANY
OF
AND
DEVELOP
STREETS
MANY
PROJECTS.
MENTIONED
OF
FURTHER
COSTLY
USAGE,
STREET
NOT
OF
STREETS,
MUCH
OTHERS,
YEARS
MORE
IN
AS
TEN
OR
PROJECT
RECREATIONAL
FIRST
FIVE
REASONABLY
FREEWAYS
MAJOR
THE
AS
THE
THE
DESIRABLE
BE
MAJOR
ON
IMPROVEMENT
SUCH
AT
IN
WITH
WOULD
A NOMINAL
OUT
THE
CATEGORY
THE
BROUGHT
INDIVIDUAL
ARE
FOR
STREETS
PROGRAM
LAST
MAJOR
THE
IMPROVEMENT
USAGE
THE
PRESENTATION
STUDY
TRAFFIC
THE
HEREINAFTER
AS
MAJOR
OF
THE
THERE
IN
THE
THE
20-YEAR
ACCOMPLISHED
FOLLOWS
THIS
THE
COMPLETION
HAS
WHICH
OF
THE
PROGRAM.
EXPRESSWAYS.
PLETED,
THAT
IMPROVED
BE
PENDING
IS
OF
THEM.
WHICH
CATEGORY.
THE
SERVICING
FARM-TO-MARKET
NOT
OF
FOR
BEEN
SUCH
INCLUDED
PROJECTS
THESE
COULD
BE
ARE
OF
TRAFFIC.
AS
AND
ONLY
ENUMERATED
TIME
NOT'
IT,
DID
THREE
THAT
OF
AS
NOT
DEVELOPING
ONLY
WELL
PERMIT
OF
COSTS
MANY
WOULD
FALL
SUCH
IN
FREMONT
FIGURE 16
PORTLAND WESTSIDE CENTRAL
BUSINESS DISTRICT
40-
LOOKING NORTHWEST
FREEWAY
FIGURE 17
PORTLAND WESTSIDE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT LOOKING

-41 -
SOUTH
DELAWARE
FREEWAY
BARNES ROAD
|EXPRESSWAY |
Fremont
Bridge
FREEWAY
HARBOR
DRIVE
FREEWAY
FREEWAY
FIGURE 18
EASTSIDE
PORTLAND LOOKING NORTHWEST

-42-
DELAWARE
FREEWAY
Bridge
DRIVE
Fremont
FIGURE 19
LOOKING
NORTHWEST ALONG THE WILLAMETTE

-43-
RIVER
FREEWAYS
-45-
THE
Y E A R S
B E E N
B A N F I E L D
BETWEEN
S T A T E
F R E E W A Y
FT H I S
F R E E W A Y
ROAD
PASSENGER
L I N E
ENTERS
IN
SULL IVAN
T H E
F I C
ON
T H I S
TER
F1
BANFIELD
FREEWAY
RIVER
S E C T I O N .
F R O M
T H A T
S E C T I O N
B A N F I E L D
4 2 N D
T H E
P A C I F I C
LENGTH
4 2 N D
A V E N U E
F R O M
R A I L -
4 2 N D
A N D
A S
W I L L
H A V E
W I L L
A V E N U E
B E D O N E
B E O P E N
B E E N
L E T
B E O P E N
I S
I N T H EN E A R
T O T R A F F I C
I S T O B E C O N S T R U C T E D
T H E
T O
T R A F -
B U T I
A V E N U E ,
T O S O M E
F R E E W A Y ,
B E I N G
T R A F F I C
V O L U M E S
FOR
WAY
4 2 N D
A V E N U E
D E S I R I N G
S T R E E T
I N
V E H I C L E S
P E RD A Y .
F O R E A R L Y
T W H I C H
T W I L L
O F T H EF R E M O N T
I M P R O V E M E N T S
F L A N K I N G
I T OF A NALMOST
P E R
D A Y
I N
T H E
T R O U T D A L E
T H E B A N F I E L D
C O M P L E T I O N ,
W I L L
S O P E N E D .
I
O F
R A N G E
W E S T O F
V O L U M E S
T H E V I C I N I T Y
R E P O R T ,
SOA S T O R E L I E V E
T O
V E H I C L E S
A N D T R A F F I C
T O U S E I
A F T E R
T H EC O N S T R U C T I O N
M A J O R
8 , 0 0 0
I N T H I S
A R E E X P E C T E D
T O 3 0 , 0 0 0
F R E E W A Y .
S C H E D U L E D
S H O R T L Y
E L S E W H E R E
V O L U M E S
C R E A T E
W I L L
M A J O R
A S B R O U G H T O U T
B E N E C E S S A R Y
F R E E W A Y
L A T E R
A N D C E R T A I N
CERTAIN
F R E E -
OVERLOAD.
F U T U R E A N D
B Y 1 95 8 .
T O S I X L A N E S
T H E
L A T -
T R A F F I C
A N D F R O M
O P P O S I
I N T E R C H A N G E
W I L L
B E A S S H O W N
O N
T E PA G E.
O FB A N F I E L D
FREEWAY
LOOKING
EAST
FROM
BURNSIDE
TO
N . E .
BRIDGE.
C O S T
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LENGTH
(MILES)
TOTAL
C O N S T R U C T E D .
(US3C)
FROM
N . E .
B E
P E R D A Y I NT H E S E C T I O N
P O R T I O N
A M O U N T I N G
S E C T I O N
R I V E R
W I L L
FA I R V I E W
MODEL
W I L L A M E T T E
L A N E S
D I M I N I S H I N G
E A S T E R L Y
H A V E
L E T
TI
V E H I C L E S
O F T H EC A S C A D E
M O R E
B E T W E E N
T H A T
A R E Y E T T O B E
S E C T I O N
F O U R
1 9 7 5T R A F F I C
6 5 , 0 0 0
E A S T
T H R O U G H O U T
I S A N T I C I P A T E D
C O N T R A C T S
R I V E R - 4 2 N D
S U C H
E A S T E R L Y
BY
LOCA-
T H E L O C A T I O N
A C Q U I R E D
E A S T E R L Y
O F 1 9 5 5 .
W I L L
B E E N
A V E N U E
T H E
E X P R E S S W A Y )
R l V E R .
PROPER
S E V E R A L
O F
T H EU N I O N
C O N T R A C T S
A N DF A I R V I E W .
I N T H E F A L L
S E C T I O N
P O R T I O N S
I T SE N T I R E
O FPORTLAND
O F W A Y H A V E
T H EW I L L A M E T T E
E X P E C T E D
H A S F O R
G U LCH .
A V E N U E
S E C T I O N
P A R A L L E L S
THROUGHOUT
T H E C l T Y
E N T I R E
4 2 N D
C A L L E D
A N D T H E W I L L A M E T T E
T I O N
I T
D E P A R T M E N T
A N DC O N S T R U C T I N G
( F O R M E R L Y
TROUTDALE
R I G H T S
WILLAMETTE
H I G H W A Y
P R O G R A M I N G
4 2 N D
F A I R V I E W
A V E N U E
2 . 54
11.38
13.92
LANES
NO .
6 5 , 000
20 , 0 0 0
GRADING
&
STRUCTURES
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
(!)
PAviNG
($)
1.710
000
'
2 , 500 . 0 0 0
WORK
1.710.000
2 , 500 . 0 0 0
4, 200 . 000
UNDER
4 , 200
000
1
.46-
2 . 9 7 5 . 000
7 . 17 5 , 0 0 0
2 , 9 7 5 . 000
7 . 1 7 5 . 000
CONTRACT
T H E
LEGEND
FOR A L L FREEWAYS
(Fl to FI4 incl.)
Structures
Grading & Paving
Direction of Traffic
-47-
F l - BANFIELD
FREEWAY
FI-BANFIELD FREEWAY
-48-
FAIRVIEW
TROUTDALE
FI-BANFIELD FREEWAY
49-
I N
P L E T E D
T H EH A R B O R
B R I D G E
A N DI
P R O A C H E S
O U T S E T
D A T E
N O W A P P E A R S
I N C R E A S E D
S T E E L
B R I D G E
1 9 7 5 .
P R O P O S E D
T H A T
S U N S E T
W I L L
M O V I N G
D I R E C T
A N D
O F WORK
C O N N E C T I N G
RAMPS
A L S O
C O N S I D E R S
M O R R I S O N
T W O - L E V E L
B U I L D I N G .
B E C O M E
T H A T
S E C T I O N
A D J A C E N T
P R E S E N T
B E
C A P A C I T Y
E A S T
T O
D R I V E .
I T
S E C T I O N
T O T H EN O R T H .
C L A Y - M A R K E T
CONSTRUCTION
H A R B O R
D R I V E
T H E
F A R
E X P R E S S W A Y
T I O N
OF
O P E N I N G S
T O A
T R A F F I C
V E R S I O N
BE
P R O G R A M
WORK
STRUCTION
BELOW
COSTS
E X I S T S
O F A
S U N S E T
F R E E W A Y ,
R I G H T
T O A
S T R E E T
F O RT H ESEVERAL
PHASES
TRAFFIC
( 1975)
(ADT)
LENGTH
TO
(MILES)
B U R N S I D E
M O R R I S O N
S T E E L
B R I D G E
B R I D G E
H A W T H O R N E
T O T A L
B R I D G E
B R I D G E
W E S T
CONFLICTING
P R O P E R .
S T A G E S
S T A G E
T H R E E
N E WW I L L A M E T T E
T H R O U G H
CROSS-MOVEMENTS
T W O C A L L S F O R
C O N N E C T I O N S
R I V E R
C A L L
T O
F O R
B R I D G E
C O N -
A N D
C L A Y
T O
E A S T B O U N D
T H I S
I S
1 4 T H
C O S T ,
O F
T H E
EB U I L D I N G
F A
S T R E E T
C U T
A R E A S
A N D
O N
C L A Y
S T R E E T
T U N N E L
DT H E M A R K E T
S T R E E T
T U N N E L
A N A L T E R N A T E
A N D I N C L U D I N G
S K E T C H
T H E I N T E R C H A N G E
T H ES U N S E T
F R E E W A Y
I L L U S T R A T I N G
A T H A R B O R
D R I V E
P L A N .
T H E
C O N -
$ 9 6 0 , 0 0 0
W O U L D
O F T H E C L A Y T H E
T H E
CON-
O F WORK.
A P P R O A C H
S T E E L
B R I D G E
B R I D G E
P O R T L A N D - S A L E M
F R E E W A Y
GRAD I N G
&
STRUCTURES
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
<$)
($)
($)
PAVING
($)
-
0.44
6 0 , 000
6
2
20,000
530,000
550.000
0 . 50
60,000
7 5 , 000
855,000
330,000
1 00 . 0 0 0
A P P R O A C H E S
H A W T H O R N E
LANES
NO.
0.35
1 . 29
1 70 , 000
26 5 , 0 0 0
-50-
F R O M
H E R E I N B E F O R E
DETAIL
O F W A Y B E C O M E
T O B U I L D
P R E S E N T
O F
S T R E E T S
R I G H T
I S P O S S I B L E
W I T H I N
A N DT
T H I S
S T R E E T S - - T H E
T R A F F I C .
W I T H
F O R T H EP U R C H A S E
A N DM A R K E T
A V E N U E
I T
S E C T I O N
T R A F F I C
P L A N
SHOWN
C A L L S
C L A Y
B U T S H O U L D
A N D M A R K E T
O F . T H E
C R O S S -
P L A N
C O S T
FROM
A P P R O A C H
F R E E W A Y
F I N A L
I N
T U N N E L
S E C T 1 ON
E A S T
O N E - W A Y
R E S P E C T I V E L Y .
D R I V E
W E S T B O U N D
C O N N E C T I O N S .
I NC O N S I D E R A B L E
H A R B O R
C A N B E A C C O M P L I S H E D
WITHOUT
F W A YB E T W E E N
STREET
F O R T H E
F R E E W A Y .
C O U P -
A N D
I N T E R C H A N G E B E -
A N D F O U R
C O V E R
T H R O U G H O U T
T H ED E V E L O P M E N T
N O T E S S E N T I A L
D R I V E
T H E E A S T E R L Y
O N E - W A Y
A - J E F F E R S O N
W H I L E
D R I V E
P R O H I B I T I V E
B Y
T H I S
C O N S T R U C -
E L I M I N A T E
F O RT H EC O N S T R U C T I O N
OUTLINES
A N D
C L O S U R E
A S M E N T I O N E D
I N
A N D C O L U M B I A . J E F F E R S O N
SUMMARY
F O RA
A N DT H E R E B Y
D A T E
A N D I S
I M M E D I A T E L Y
A L L O W
A N O V E R - A L L
D I R E C T
A N D M A R K E T
T H EL A T T E R
H A R B O R
T H E
T O
O F
A- JEFFERSON
A S P R E S E N T L Y
O F T H EE X P R E S S W A Y
S P E N T
M A R K E T
W I L L
D R I V E
L A T E R
B E D O N E ,
I S T H ES I M U L T A N E O U S
O T H E R
A T A
S H O U L D
B E T W E E N
A N DC O L U M B I
C O N -
I S THE
A C C O M P L I S H E D
A N D C L A Y
A- J E F F E R S 0 N
B E T W E E N
T H U S ,
O F
W I L L
I S A V A I L A B L E
T H E C O N V E R S I O N
AND COLUMBI
T H EM E D I A N S
A T G R A D E .
O V E R - A L L
P L A N
O F H A R B O R
C O M E
I N
D R I V E
F R E E W A Y
H A R B O R
T H A T
F R E E W A Y ,
SUCH
I N
L E N G T H
W O U L D
WORK
I M P O R T A N T
I NI T S
STAGE
B E
T H E P 0 R T L A N D - S A L E M
R E C O N S T R U C T E D
L O A D .
THE C L A Y - M A R K E T
C O N N E C T I O N S .
THE
F I R S T
T H EM O S T
S T A G E S
C O N S T R U C T I N G
D E P R E S S E D W A Y .
F2 - HARBOR DRIVE FREEWAY (US99)

STEEL BRIDGE - PORTLAND-SALEM FREEWAY
F R E E W A Y
P R E S E N T A T I O N
F O RC O N S T R U C T I N G
C O N N E C T I O N
A N D H A R B O R
S T R U C T I O N
B E T W E E N T H E
H A R B O R
D I R E C T
T W E E N
O N
N O R T H B O U N D
S A L E M
F I R S T
A N DS H O U L D
A N D T H E C O L U M B I
D R I V E
THIS
T O T H E O R E G O N
F O U R - L A N E
A N DM U S T
P O T E N T I A L
T H E A N T I C I P A T E D
D R I V E
B E T W E E N
F O U R
T H E
I T C A L L S
C O U P L E T S
P R O P E R ,
A N DF R O M
O N T O H A R B O R
V I A D U C T
I N C A P A C I T Y
S U F F I C I E N T
H A R B O R
B R I D G E S
T H E
D E F I C I E N T
T H E B R I D G E
E A S T B O U N D ,
B R I D G E
A N D H A W T H O R N E
J O U R N A L
H A N D L E
O N
C A L L S F O R
T H A T
B E T W E E N
B E C O N C E I V E D
T H A T
O U T L I N E D .
D A T E .
ROAD
W I T H
B E N O T E D
BEEN
A N DA
F R O N T A G E
T O C A R E F O R
A N D 5 3
F R E E W A Y
A N D ( 2 ) A
A S I T WOULD
O F T H ES E V E R A L
E A R L Y
S T R E E T S
V E H I C L E S P E R
S O A S
W I L L
F R E E W A Y
D R I V E
Y E A R S ,
5 2
C O N S T R U C T I O N
A N DT H EP O R T L A N D -
P R O G R A M
HAVE
U R G E N T
A N
L E T
B R I D G E
B E T W E E N
O F FT H EB U R N S I D E
A T
B E T W E E N T H E
T O B E A C C O M P L I S H E D
B R I D G E
M O R E
O N P A G E S
S T A G E .
I T
T H E
O N T H EH A R B O R
S E V E R A L
T H E O V E R - A L L
S H O W N
( 1 ) T H ES T A G E
B R I D G E
T H EN E X T
S T R U C T I O N
W I L L
1 9 7 5 .
O F T R A F F I C
T H EB U R N S I D E
S O U T H
B Y
P L A C E
H A W T H O R N E
F IN A L
O F T H E S E C T I O N
O F 1 0 0 , 0 0 0
T A K E
D U R I N G
OF
I L L U S T R A T I O N S
R E S P E C T I V E L Y ;
I N
P E RD A Y O N
T O T A L
T H E
F U T U R E
A N DT H EP O R T L A N D - S A L E M
A
F R E E W A Y ,
V E H I C L E S
D R I V E
F O R T H
W O U L D
T H E
C O N V E R S I O N
T H E M A J O R I T Y
O F T H ES T E E L
L A N E S
T O A
V O L U M E S
O F H A R B O R
SET
T O
A T
A T SOME
T H I S
D R I V E
P R E S E N T - D A Y
6 0 , 0 0 0
F R E E W A Y
T Y P E
" W I D E N I N G "
S I X
T H A T
T H A T
B E C O N V E R T E D
T O C O M P L E T E
F R E E W A Y
U S ET H I S
T H E
T H E
O F T R A F F I C .
P O R T I O N
DAY
FREE
T H A T
T O SOME
B R I D G E A
O F H A R B O R
A N D T H R O U G H O U T
I N
T H ES T E E L
FLOW
T H E
C O M -
O F T H E S T E E L
E X T E N S I O N
C O U L D
D E P A R T M E N T
S O U T H
W A SS O C O N C E I V E D
D E S I R A B L E
H A V E
SO
P E R M I T
T H ED E S I G N
I S
H I G H W A Y
E X P R E S S W A Y
N O R T H E R L Y
T H EE X P R E S S W A Y
I T
I T
D R I V E
A S WOULD
T H A T
BY
T H ES T A T E
N 1 9 5 1R E C O N S T R U C T E D
A N DA
S T A N D A R D S
I T
1 9 4 1
2 , 500 , 0 0 0
788, 000
4 , 6 7 3 , 000
2,500,000
2 , 500 . 000
200 . 0 0 0
-
9 58 , 0 0 0
4.938.000
7 50.000
9 30.000
2 . 000
|
202,000
960 . 000
,
5.140,000
BROADWAY
BRIDGE
STEEL
BRIDGE
BURNSIDE
BRIDGE
MORRISON
BRIDGE
HARBOR DRIVE
FREEWAY
HAWTHORNE
BRIDGE
F2 -HARBOR DRIVE FREEWAY

-51 -
HARBOR DRIVE FREEWAY (US 99)
EXISTING
STAGE 1
-52
SUNSET FREEWAY
(US 26) PORTLAND-SALEM FREEWAY (US 99) SECTION
STAGE 2
ULTIMATE
-53'
RIVER
I N C L U D I N G
THE
S U N S E T
WAY
STATUS
T H E I N T E R C H A N G E
FREEWAY
THE
O V E R P A S S E S
RAIL
T H E
SECTION
F E N C E
O F
THIS
TO
BETWEEN
D R I V E
FREEWAY.
COORDINATE
DISCUSSED
A L S O
WORK
D R I V E
W I T H
T O
O N
T H EF R O N T
P E D E S T R I A N
IS PLANNED
COMPLETION
F R E E -
O FUNDER
A N D
HAND-
A N D T H E SIDEWALK O N
T O P R E C L U D E
WITH
O F HARBOR
U S E A N D A NINSULATING
F A C I L I T I E S
SUCH
IN S T A G E
I S SHOWN
T H E CONSTRUCTION
T H E FREEWAY
I T W I L L
O R H A N D R A I L
H A R B O R
C O N V E R S I O N
REQUIRES
F O R PEDESTRIAN
S E A W A L L .
D R I V E
P L A N .
F I N A L
ALSO
A T H A R B O R
T O
C O N S T R U C T
A V E N U E
S I D E
C R O S S I N G S
FOR EXECUTION
OF THE CONSTRUCTION
O N E AND ILLUSTRATED
O F
SO AS
AS
ON PAGE 5 2 .
i
MODEL OF HARBOR DRIVE FREEWAY - WEST APPROACH MORRISON
HARBOR DRIVE FREEWAY(US99)
BRIDGE, LOOKING EAST.
SUNSET FREE WAY (US 26) PORTLAND-SALEM FREEWAYOJS 99) SECTION
LEGEND
EXISTING PAVEMENT
NEW WORK
PAVEMENT
STRUCTURES
TUNNELS
ISLANDS
ALTERNATE ULTIMATE PLAN
-54-
HARBOR DRIVE AND SUNSET FREEWAY CONNECTIONS

-55-
T H I S
S T A T E
H I G H W A Y
MAJOR
DESIRE
LOCATED
LINES
MOST
HEREIN
W A Y
AND
ADJACENT
I SSCHEDULED
LINE
T H E I N T E R -
1 2 .
T OS . W .BARBUR
T H E
| T
I S
BOULEVARD
T H ECONSTRUCTION P R O -
T H E NORTHERLY
P O R T L A N D
I N
F O RO N E O F
INFIGURE
O F I T S LENGTH.
COUNTY
L I N K
A N D C A R E S
A SILLUSTRATED
COMPLETES
B E T W E E N
MULTNOMAH
C O M P L E T E S
F O R U S 9 9
IMMEDIATELY
THROUGHOUT
POSED
F R E E W A Y
S Y S T E M
LINK
D S A L E M .
T OSALEM
T H A T
O FT H E FREES E C T I O N
I SN O W U N D E R
F O R COMPLETION
INLATE
F R O M
CONTRACT
1 9 5 5O R M I D D L E
1956 .
T H I S
I N T E R T H E
I T
F R E E W A Y
S O U T H W E S T
I
U R B A N
E X P R E S S W A Y
L A N E S
F R O M
1 9 7 5
C L E S
HARBOR DRIVE
FREEWAY
(US99)
F R E E W A Y
M A J O R
S T R E E T S
O U T .
A T
TUALATIN
F U T U R E
RIVER
I N T O
F I C
A S S H O W N
T H E M U L T -
S E C T I O N
S U C H
D E P R E S S E D
H I G H W A Y
O F O T H E R
A S
B E T W E E N
F R E E W A Y S ,
I S
T H I S
(MlLES)
R o s s
I S L A N D
M U L T N O M A H
S . W .
W A S H I N G T O N
E X P R E S S W A Y
T O T A L
H I G H W A Y
C O U N T Y
I S L A N D
M U L T N O M A H
B R I D G E
C A P I T O L
R O S S
L I N E
S . W .
A N D
T H A T
V E H I -
I S T O B E M A D E
O R A T GRADE
S
T O W A R D
P O R T L A N D -
C O N S T R U C T E D
C A N B E
W I T H
T H E
R I G H T
THROUGHSO
T H A T
I N T E G R A T E D
S E L L W O O D
F W A Y
A C Q U I -
O F M O V I N G
T R A F -
S T H E D E M A N D
R E -
X L A N E S
T l G A R D
P A G E .
F A C I L I T I E S
S O T H A T
T H E
I S
T H E C O N N E C T I O N
A N D M U L T N O M A H
I T .
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LENGTH
TO
F R E E W A Y
B Y
C O S T
FROM
D R I V E
F O U R
6 5 , 0 0 0
1 5 , 0 0 0
S E C T I ON
H A R B O R
A N D
B E S O M E
F O R S O M E
O N T H EO P P O S I T E
H I G H W A Y
C A N B E E X T E N D E D
QU I R E S
O F
A R E A S .
S O U T H W E S T E R L Y .
N O R T H E R L Y
S D E V E L O P E D
T H EO U T S E T
I T ,
S I T I O N
B E T W E E N
F R E E W A Y ,
W I L L
C A R E
A N D O T H E R
P R O G R A M I N G
F R E E W A Y
X L A N E S
D R I V E
T H E R E
W I L L
M U C H
D A Y .
T H I S
PORTLAND-SALEM FREEWAY
T H A T
S E C T I O N
A C C E S S
C O N S I D E R A B L E
S E R V E S
R E S I D E N T I A L
E X P R E S S W A Y
P E RD A Y I N T H EM O S T
PE R
S A L E M
T O S
A N DH A R B O R
S E X P E C T E D
S O U T H E R L Y
C A R R I E S
B U TA L S O
A N D S U B U R B A N
T H EM U L T N O M A H
V E H I C L E S
F3
T R A F F I C
S T O B E C O N S T R U C T E D
N O M A H
T H E
N O TO N L Y
A N D I N T R A - S T A T E
B R I D G E
E X P R E S S W A Y
C A P I T O L
W A S H I N G T O N
T U A L A T I N
H I G H W A Y
C O U N T Y
L I N E
LANES
No.
GRADING
STRUCTURES
($)
($)
0 . 55
6 5 , 000
1 80 . 000
3.18
55,000
1 . 960 . 000
1.74
33 . 0 0 0
950.000
1.14
1 5 . 000
4 20 . 0 0 0
780 , 000
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
1 . 1 4 0 . 000
2 . 1 0 0 . 000
2 . 0 9 0 . 000
5.040.000
730.000
1 .680.000
1 . 950 . 000
3.630.000
420 . 000
320 , 0 0 0
740.000
2 . 6 8 0 . 000
1
1
960 . 000
2.950.000
Wo RK
3,510.000
-56
R/W
990.000
R I V E R
6.6 1
CONSTR.
PAVING
C f O M P L E T E D
6 . 0 1 0 . 000
5.500.000
11.510.000
ROSS
-57-
ISLAND BRIDGE
F3-P0RTLAND-SALEM
FREEWAY
(U S 99)
PROPOSED TRAFFIC INTERCHANGE PORTLAND SALEM-FREEWAY

BARBUR BOULEVARD NEAR TIGARD. LOOKING NORTH
-58-
PROPOSED CONNECTIONS PORTLAND-SALEM FREEWAY

AT S.W. MACADAM AND HOOD AVENUES
-59-
T H I S
T H E
C I T Y
O F
T R A F F I C
SIRE
AS
B I S E C T S
A N D
I N D I C A T E D
L I N E S
A N D
L A U R E L H U R S T
IN
13.
H I G H W A Y
ROUTING
I T
I S
THE
V E R Y
12
AND
H A R B O R
A
P O R T I O N
H E A V Y
AS
D R I V E
A N D
O T H E R
DE-
F R E E W A Y
IN
A N D
I S
T H I S
F R E E W A Y
V E H I C L E S
PER
E A S T E R L Y
P O R T I O N
A L S O
C O M P A N Y
AND
I N
THE
M T .
HOOD
STRUCTION
FROM
I S
L O C A T E D
T H A T
VOLUMES
AS
BY
T H E
A R E
1 9 7 5 .
W A Y
I N
F R E E W A Y
ROUTING
L I N N E M A N
C O N T I N U O U S
IN
T H I S
A L O N G
T H E
THE
A R E A
T H E
AT
D E V E L O P E D
T H E
MAIN
CASCADE
AND
EAST
A S
A
T H E
R O S S
T R A C T I O N
O F T H E SOUTHERN
AVENUE.
FREEWAY
THEREOF
H A R B O R
E A S T
T H E R E O F
F E L T
T H A T
FREEWAYS
D E M A N D S
L A N E S
D R I V E
A T
A S
THIS
EASTSIDE
EXPRESSWAY
LAURELHURST
S.E.
58TH
CASCADE
122ND
FREEWAY
TO
AVENUE
FREEWAY
AVENUE
TOTAL
MCLOUGHLIN
EASTSIDE
EXPRESSWAY
EXPRESSWAY
S . E .
A N D
TO
S . E .
G R E S H A M
P R O P O S E D
L A N E S
W I T H
L A N E S
T H E
B E T W E E N
L A T E R
C A N
B E
D A T E ,
E X P E C T E D
A N D
W I L L
F O R
B E
T H E
TO
F R E E W A Y ,
P R O V I S I O N
W I L L
F O R
A D E Q U A T E L Y
U T I L I Z E
I T
A D D I N G
A N D
S E R V E
T H I S
K E Y
B E A N D
O F
I S
TWO
C A S C A D E
T R A F F I C
F R E E W A Y .
A R E A ,
F O R
LlNNEMAN
T O
T O
IS E I T H E R
B R I D G E
C R O S S E S
I S L A N D
S A N D Y ,
E X P R E S S -
P A C I F I C
T H E
AT
A T
O V E R -
O R E G O N
SPEAKING,
OR
T H E
T H E
R I V E R
COMPANY,
IS A D E P R E S S E D
DEPRESSED
O F
A C R O S S
B R I D G E .
C O M P A N Y ' S
GENERALLY
FREEWAY
C I T Y
UNION
WEST
OF
SECTION
GRADE.
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LANES
6 5,000
- -
9 . 000.000
9.000. 000
700 . 000
0 . 98
50.000
320 . 000
2 . 450.000
2 . 7 7 0 .000
2 . 300. 000
5 .070 . 0 0 0
1 .07
45.000
6 10.000
1 90 . 0 0 0
800 . 000
2 . 000 .000
2 . 8 0 0 .000
0 . 94
35.000
670,000
1 70 . 0 0 0
840 , 000
1 . 400 . 0 0 0
2 . 2 4 0 .000
1 . 26
25,000
860 . 000
490 . 0 0 0
1 . 350.0 0 0
1 . 900. 0 0 0
3 . 2 5 0 .0 0 0
2.18
1 5 , 000
780.000
6 10. 0 0 0
1 . 390 . 0 0 0
3 .00
14 .000
800.000
4. 040.000
L E N G T H
( M I L E S )
EXPRESSWAY
A C C E S S
C O S T
FROM
MCLOUGHLIN
A R E
F R E E W A Y
F O U R
T H I S .
S E C T I O N
FREEWAY
AVENUES
J U N C T I O N
I N
D E V E L O P E D
O F C O N -
C O N T I N U A T I O N
N E W
S T R U C T U R E
T O
P O R T L A N D
LINE
W I T H
T H I S
S I M I L A R
AND GRAND
THE
S T A R T S
( U S 2 6 ) .
R I V E R .
L E V E L
CROSSES
LINE.
F R E E W A Y
F R E E W A Y
H I G H
AVENUE
DRIVE
I S
A L L
A N D
S T A N D A R D S .
W I L L A M E T T E
HARBOR
A C C E S S
A N D7 2 N D
W I T H
C R O S S E S
B U T
D E S T I N E D
E A S T E R L Y
L I N N E M A N
A C C E S S
I T
P . E . P .
S O U T H E A S T
ARE TERMINATED
T H A T
D E V E L O P E D .
A D D I T I O N A L
S O M E
F R E E W A Y
I S
W E S T 6 0 , 0 0 0
WHILE
T R A F F I C
J U N C T I O N
B U T
AS
R E C R E A T I O N A L
T H E
T H E
F R E E W A Y .
E X P E C T E D .
S O U T H E A S T
O F
I N
HIGH
C A S C A D E
D E V E L O P M E N T
R I G H T
T H E
ON T H I S
B U T
THE
F4 - MT. HOOD FREEWAY (US26)

HARBOR DRIVE FREEWAY - LINNEMAN JUNCTION
D A Y
T H E
A R E A .
R O U T I N G
S U N S E T
O F
I N D U S T R I A L
R A I L R O A D
J U N C T I O N
WAY
P E R
A D D I T I O N
SO
EXPECTED
E A S T
N O T O N L Y
P L A N N E D
THE
ARE
V E H I C L E S
S E R V E S
THE
DAY
I S
TRAFFIC
D E V E L O P S
N E I G H B O R H O O D
O F S . E . 58TH
A T
S i x
THEREOF
L O C A L
S T R E E T .
F R E E W A Y .
PORTIONS
1 5 , 0 0 0
T H E R E T O
F R E E W A Y
THE
TWEEN
ERN
H O O D
A N D
T H EV I C I N I T Y
H O L G A T E
A L T E R -
V I A
M T .
F R E E W A Y S
A D D I T I O N
U S 9 9
AN
HIGHWAY
THE
O F
BY
B E T W E E N
F R E E W A Y )
I N T E R S T A T E
O F
L O A D
SHOWN
C O N N E C T I O N
D R I V E
U S 9 9
S O U T H E A S T
FIGURE
( H A R B O R
OF
T H E
S E R V E S
B E T W E E N
F R E E W A Y ,
I N T E R S T A T E
N A T E
FREEWAY
P O R T L A N D
5 8 T H
C A S C A D E
1 2 2 N D
L I N N E M A N
F R E E W A Y
A V E N U E
F R E E W A Y
A V E N U E
J U N C T I O N
0.68
10.11
NO.
GRADING
ft
STRUCTURES
CONSTR
($)
($)
PAviNG
($)
250.000
13,160.000
r
-60-
1.050. 000
17.200. 000
R/W
(*)
300
TOTAL
($)
.000
9 .700. 000
1 . 690 .0 0 0
230 . 000
1 . 2 8 0 .000
8 . 830 . 000
26 . 0 3 0 .000
F 4 - MT. HOOD FREEWAY (US 26)

-61 -
TYFiCAL SECTION EAST OF CASCADE FREEWAY, LOOKING EAST
TYPICAL SECTION EAST OF 122ND AVENUE, LOOKING WEST
-62-
F4~ MT. HOOD FREEWAY (US 26)

-63-
THE
L E N G T H .
A R T E R I A L
S U N S E T
H I G H W A Y
S T A N D A R D S .
T H R O U G H
A
S T R E E T
V I R G I N
B R I D G E
A S
F R E E W A Y
A C R O S S
O F
I S
O F
D E P R E S S E D
O N E - W A Y
R I V E R
ON
F R E E W A Y
I N
F R E E W A Y
T H A T
F R E E W A Y
B E -
F R E E W A Y ) .
WAY
A
T R A F F I C
M I N I M U M
E R L Y
O F
V O L U M E S
1 0 , 0 0 0
V E H I C L E S
E X T R E M I T I E S
5 0 . 0 0 0
V E H I C L E S
D R I V E
O F
FROM
S Y L V A N
T H I S
P E R D A Y I N
T O H A R B O R
AVENUE
D R I V E
R A N G E
1 9 75
U R B A N
I N
W I L L
B E
T O SYLVAN
FROM
T H E
W E S T -
T O
S O M E
A R E A
T H E S T A D I U M
T H E F R E E W A Y
WHEELER
P R O J E C T
T H E P O R T L A N D
P E R D A Y B E T W E E N
F R E E W A Y S .
LANES
O N
T O
S H O W N
P R O P O S E D
FROM
W A Y S .
I N
M A J O R
A C C E S S
T H E C E N T R A L
G E N E R A L L Y
S P E A K I N G ,
A T T H E I N T E R S E C T I O N
S T R E E T S
A D D I T I O N ,
S I T E
P A G E ;
A R EP R O V I D E D
A N D E X P R E S S W A Y S
P O I N T S
IN
W I T H
A S
C A U S E D
T H I S
D I R E C T L Y
B E
F O R
O P P O -
H A R B O R
D R I V E
F R E E W A Y
S M A D E
W H E R E I N
F O R
F5 - SUNSET FREEWAY (US26)

WHEELER AVENUE - HARBOR DRIVE FREEWAY
B E T W E E N
T H ES U N S E T
A N D H A R B O R
D R I V E
WAYS
W A SD I S C U S S E D
W I T H
R E F E R E N C E
T O
A S P R O P O S E D
A C Q U I S I T I O N
F T H EP U B L I C
A N D R E S U L T I N G
T E D
T O B E L E S S
A N D
F I L L "
T H E
T A K I N G
S I R A B L E
T H A N
T U N N E L
O F
A U D I T O R I U M .
T H E P R O G R A M M I N G
O F
C A L L S
A C -
S E C T I O N
O N C L A Y
T H E A U D I T O R I U M
F O R T H E
EC O S T
C O S T S
A F F O R D S
I N J E C T E D
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
(MILES)
M U R R A Y
R O A D
B A R N E S
B A R N E S
R O A D
W A S H I N G T O N
T U N N E L
S.W.
R O A D
R O A D
M U L T N O M A H
E X P R E S S W A Y
C O U N T Y
L I N E
T U N N E L
S.W.
P O R T A L
H A R B O R
1 4 T H A V E .
O N E - W A Y
B E T W E E N
C O U P L E T
W A S
B E
I N T O
D R I V E
F R E E W A Y
D R I V E
T H ED E S I G N
T H ES U N S E T
F O RT H O S E
W O U L D
F R E E W A Y A N D
D E S T I N E D
A N D T H E
I N M A K I N G
M A D E
F R E E W A Y
D I S T A N C E
E A D D I T I O N A L
F R E E W A Y
D R I V E
B E
S O M E A D -
F R E E W A Y
N O R T H B O U N D
W O U L D
I T
W E A V I N G
O N H A R B O R
T H A T
F U R T H E R ,
A D E Q U A T E
W O U L D
S O A S T O C A R E
TO
T H E P O R T L A N D S A L E M
O N P O R T L A N D S A L E M
T H E R E
I T
H A R B O R
D E P R E S S E D W A Y
R E Q U I R E D .
T R A F F I C
A S
B E T W E E N
S U N S E T
C O M P L I C A -
A D E Q U A T E C O N -
A N D H A R B O R
T R A F F I C
D R I V E
M O V E M E N T S
WOULD
BE
H A R B O R
D E S T I N E D
T H E
D R I V E
F O R T H E P 0 R T L A N D - S A L E M
WOULD
WOULD
B U S I N E S S
FREEWAY..
B E
H I G H E R
N O T G I V E
EQUAL
T H E C O S T
THAN
O F
T H I S
F R E E W A Y
A L T E R N A T E
F O R T H E L O C A T I O N
T R A F F I C
S E R V I C E
TO
S E L E C T E D
T H E
C E N T R A L
D | S T R I C T .
A " C U T
S T R E E T S .
M O R E
D E -
A L I G N M E N T .
LENGTH
TO
A V E .
B R O A D -
S E C T I O N
C O S T
FROM
W H E E L E R
T O
F R E E W A Y
B E T W E E N
S E C T I O N
Mu R R A Y
D E P R E S S E D
S T R E E T
S . W .
E S T I M A -
F O R
A N D M A R K E T
A L S O
I S
C O S T S
A N D S . W .
T H E
AND
Q U I S I T I O N
1 1 T HA V E N U E
W A S N O T S E L E C T E D
D E V E L O P
W E S T B O U N D .
L O C A T I O N
T H E P L A N
O N E - W A Y
A N D FROM
S T R E E T
A V E -
S T R E E T
F R E E AND
C O N S T R U C T I O N .
T O
D R I V E
S O U T H B O U N D
T H A T
T H E H A R B O R
W O U L D
T R A F F I C
H A R B O R
T I O N S
T O D I S C U S S I O N
W I T H
N O R T H B O U N D
N E C T I O N S
R E F E R E N C E
S.W.
P R O X I M I T Y
P O S S I B L E
F R E E W A Y
D I S T R I C T .
D R I V E
U T I L I Z E D
T H E M I L L - M O N T G O M E R Y
F R E E W A Y
L O C A T I O N
A L I G N M E N T
N O R T H B O U N D
R O U T E .
T O
W A S A C C O M P L I S H E D
T H E RAMP
C L O S E
B E T W E E N
F R E E -
B E T W E E N
T R A N S I T I O N
D R I V E
L O C A T I O N
S . W . 1 4 T H A N D 1 1T H
A N D T H E M I L L - M O N T G O M E R Y
S U C H
N O T
I N T E R -
O F O T H E R
A R EP R O V I D E D
B U S I N E S S
A R E
B E T W E E N
F R E E W A Y
D I S T R I C T ,
A N D H A R B O R
A L T E R N A T E
M LL L - M O N T G O M E R Y
A N D A C C E S S E S
1 4 T H A V E N U E
T H E C L A Y - M A R K E T
T H E A R E A
C O U P L E T
FREEWAY
F R E E W A Y .
I N T E R C H A N G E S
O N T H EO P P O S I T E
C H A N G E S
I N
B U S I N E S S
F F E C T E D .
V E R S E
T R A F F I C
S E C T I O N .
W A S B E T W E E N
TO H A R B O R
H A V E
F O U R
A N DS I X L A N E S
S U C H
S U C H
A N D H A R B O R
B U I L T
S . W .
B R O A D W A Y ,
F O R T H E S U N S E T
T H E C E N T R A L
B E T W E E N
I T
O N E - W A Y
L O C A T I O N
O F
W A S S T U D I E D .
C O U P L E T .
P R O P O S E D
( M T . HOOD
S I D E
D E P R E S S E D
N U E S
T O T H E
A L T E R N A T E
T H E S O U T H
S P E C I F I C A L L Y
I S
J E F F E R S O N
C O U P L E T
T O
AN
FROM
F R E E W A Y
S P E A K ,
S O U T H
A N D C O N N E C T I N G
T H E W I L L A M E T T E
T O
T H I S
S O T O
O F I T S
H I G H W A Y
S T A N D A R D S
J U S T
S T R E E T
M O S T
S U N S E T
S E C T I O N
A V E N U E
C O N T E M P L A T E D
D R I V E
T H R O U G H O U T
A L I G N M E N T .
V I S T A
T H E C L A Y - M A R K E T
H A R B O R
I S .
T H E P R E S E N T
E A S T E R L Y
U N D E R
I S
T W E E N
O F
A N D E X P R E S S W A Y
T HE
S O M E W H A T
T U N N E L
F R E E W A Y
B E T T E R M E N T
E X P R E S S W A Y
C O U N T Y
L I N E
P O R T A L
4 T H A V E .
D R I V E
F R E E W A Y
LANES
NO.
GRADING
ft
STRUCTURES
PAVING
($)
($)
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
2 . 90
1 0 , 000
570 . 0 0 0
1 40 , 0 0 0
7 10. 000
1 30,000
1.90
25 , 0 0 0
300 , 0 0 0
1 40 . 0 0 0
440 , 000
80 . 0 0 0
1 . 90
20,000
220 , 0 0 0
40 , 0 0 0
260 . 0 0 0
2 . 59
35,000
1 . 250 . 0 0 0
300 . 0 0 0
1 . 550 , 0 0 0
0 . 58
35,000
0.69
50,000
250.000
1 . 970.000
840.000
520 . 0 0 0
20 , 0 0 0
280.000
1 , 550 . 0 0 0
A CQU I R E D
3,730,000
3 , 980 . 000
1,220.000
5 . 200 . 0 0 0
1 . 560 . 0 0 0
3,530.000
5,150,000
8,680.000
10 , 470.000
6 , 600 . 000
1 7 , 070 , 000
1 0 . 56
TOTAL
4.560,000
5,910,000
J
I
-64-
ALTERNATE
PLAN
65 -
F5-SUNSET
FREEWAY
T H E
T I O N
O F N . W .
H A V I N G
T R A V E R S E S
I N D U S T R I A L
N.W. DOANE
VATED
" S W I N G S "
THE
N.W.
1 8 T HAVENUE
THE
BY
W I L L
TER
S O THAT
E A S T
WITH
T H I S
MANY
TRAVEL.
T W E E N
I N D U S T R I A L
W A Y
N . W .
A V E N U E ,
E L E V A T E D
N
DW I L L
D O A N E
F R E E W A Y
H A V E
A V E N U E ,
S T A D I U M
W I L L
A C C E S S E S
N . W .
F R E E W A Y
B E
A T
K I T T R I D G E
ES
T O
J O H N S
S T R E E T ,
N . W .
D R I V E
F R E E -
A N D A T H A R B O R
I S
E L E -
LOCATION
C A NB E M A D E
IN T H E VICINITY
I S EXPECTED
WITH
O F
T O
T R I P S
A
O FT H E T R A F F I C
I N C H A R A C -
I N T E R S P E R S E D
V E R Y
D E F I N I T E
A N D N O R T H W E S T
SIDE
T H E R E I N .
D E S I R E
LINE
A R E A S
A N DW E S T
RANGE
F R E E W A Y T O
A N DI N D U S T R I A L
I N T H ED E S I R E
D I S T R I C T
T H E
O F T H ES T A D I U M
S E R V E S
T H ES T . J O H N S
W E S T
WHEN
T H EC O M P O S I T I O N
A S W A SE V I D E N C E D
E N O R T H -
BRIDGE)
C O M M E R C I A L
A L S O
B R I D G E ,
2 4 T H
T OT H E V I C I N I T Y
T H E FREEWAY
THAN
FREEWAY
H O M E - T O - W O R K
F R E E W A Y
I N -
L A N E S
STREET.
W E S T
T H E R E O F .
F O U R
L E N G T H
CONNECTION
A N D QUIMBY
B EP R I M A R I L Y
I T S
O FT H E
T H R O U G H
POINT
(FREMONT
2 0 , 0 0 0
O F
T H I S
L O C A -
T B U R L I N G T O N .
S E C T I O N
OTHER
ADT O N THIS
1 9 7 5FROM
3 0 . 0 0 0
A T WHICH
AVENUE
FREEWAY
A L I G N M E N T
O N V I A D U C T
SOUTHERLY
STADIUM
S T A R T E D
V I R G I N
FRONT
M O S T
T H E
A SA C O N T I N U A T I O N
W H I C H
AREA
A P P R O X I M A T E S
T H R O U G H O U T
P O I N T
STREET
ABOVE
F R E E W A Y
A V E N U E
E X P R E S S W A Y
F R E E W A Y
W E S T
F R O N T
I T SB E G I N N I N G
D U S T R I A L
OF
I N D U S T R I A L
CHART. B E -
A N D
T H E
CENTRAL
N O R T H -
BUSINESS
D| STRI C T .
T H E
S T A D I U M
R E A S O N
METTE
1 9 5
O F
R I V E R ,
C L A S S E D
THOUGH
H A V I N G
T O
MANY
O FSUCH
AREA
W I L L
H O M E S
M A I N T A I N
W I L L
WHEN
A
W A T E R .
D E S I G N
S U I T A B L E
T H E
C E R T A I N
F R E E W A Y ,
M E A N - L O W
A SA N A R E A
TION
B E T W E E N
I N T R O D U C E D
T H E S T A D I U M
F T . A B O V E
U L T I M A T E
F6 - INDUSTRIAL FREEWAY (US30)

ST. JOHNS BRIDGE - STEEL BRIDGE
F R E E W A Y S
C R O S S I N G
V E R T I C A L
T H EA R E A
W A S
T H E
T H E O V E R - A L L
A N D
B Y
W I L L A -
C L E A R A N C E
O F
I N W H I C H T H E
L O C A T E D
F O R R E D E V E L O P M E N T
B ED I S T U R B E D
I N T E R C H A N G E .
I N D U S T R I A L
C O M P L I C A T I O N S
H A S B E E N
A N D T H U S .
I N T H E C O N S T R U C E F F E C T
UPON T H E
B EA NA D V A N T A G E O U S O N E .
S E C T I O N
C O S T
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LANES
No.
1 . 94
20 . 0 0 0
1 20 , 000
3 . 500 . 000
3 , 6 2 0 , 000
50.000
3 . 670 . 000
0.64
25 , 0 0 0
70 . 000
2 . 1 6 0 , 000
2 , 230 . 000
20 . 0 0 0
2.250,000
1.76
25 , 0 0 0
40,000
5 , 6 4 0 , 000
5,680,000
1.060.000
6 , 740 . 0 0 0
2.10
30 . 0 0 0
70 . 000
7.900,000
7 , 970 , 000
3.870.000
11 , 8 4 0 . 0 0 0
300,000
1 9 , 2 0 0 , 000
1 9 . 500, 000
5 . 0 0 0 . 000
24 . 5 0 0 . 0 0 0
LENGTH
TO
FROM
(MILES)
S T .
N . W .
J O H N S
D O A N E
B R I D G E
A V E N U E
N . W .
K I T T R I D G E
N . W .
2 4 T H
S T R E E T
A V E N U E
N . W .
D O A N E
N . W .
K I T T R I D G E
N . W .
2 4 T H
H A R B O R
A V E N U E
S T R E E T
A V E N U E
D R I V E
F R E E W A Y
6 . 44
TOTAL
GRADING
PAVING
($)
STRUCTURES
(!)
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
L
_i
-66 -
STEEL
BRIDGE
BROADWAY BRIDGE
W I L L A M E T T E
STADIUM
FREEWAY
W I L LA
M E T T E
-67-
R / V
RIVER
F6-INDUSTRIAL FREEWAY
S.P.
WI L L A M E T TE
a s.
AND
N. P. R R .
R I V E R
ST. JOHNS
BRIDGE
s.p. & s. AND

N.P. R.R. BRIDGE
F6-INDUSTRIAL FREEWAY
-68-
BRIDGE
MODEL OF INDUSTRIAL FREEWAY CONNECTION TO HARBOR DRIVE FREEWAY,

LOOKING SOUTH TO STEEL BRIDGE.
TYPICAL ELEVATED SECT
ON ABOVE N.W. FRONT AVENUE
-69-
T H I S
IN
F R E E W A Y
V A N C O U V E R ,
B I A
R I V E R .
B R I D G E S
I T
A C R O S S
C O N N E C T I N G
AND
T H E N
T H E
TO
D E N V E R
C O N N E C T S
W A S H I N G T O N
T H E
C O L U M B I A
P R E S E N T
A V E N U E S .
PRESENT
LOCATION
T R A F F I C
I N T E R C H A N G E S
D E N V E R
L O C A T I O N
REACHES
SIDE
T H EBLUFF;
A V E N U E ,
I N T E R S T A T E
WAY
W I T H
THEN
N O R T H
O N
AT N . TlLLAMOOK
A N D
A L O N G
T H E
O N
T H E
T O
E X I S T -
TO
E X I S T I N G
TON
T O L L
F I N A L
BEEN
D R I V E
THE
T H I S
F R E E W A Y
I N
P O R T L A N D
A N D
I S
C O M M O D I T I E S
T R A F F I C
S O M E
A R E A
V I T A L
I N
V O L U M E S
C O L U M B I A
F7 - DELAWARE FREEWAY (US99)

VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON - HARBOR DRIVE FREEWAY
WILL
NEW
W I L L ,
E C T
T O
BRIDGE
D A Y
S O M E
N .
1 9 7 5 .
T W I N
A N D C O L U M B I A
T H R E E
L A N E S
THAT
S L O U G H
THROUGH
THE
POINT
UNION
AND
U N I O N
V A N P O R T
N.
L O M B A R D
N.
K 1 L L 1 N G S W O R T H
S T A D I U M
S T R E E T
F R E E W A Y
TOTAL
N . E .
U N I O N
V A N P O R T
A V E N U E
S T R E E T
O F
T R A F F I C
DENVER
AVENUE
THE
C R O S S I N G
U N T I L
T H E S E
T H E
O R E G O N
T H E
T H E
S T A T E
H I G H W A Y
T H E
C O L U M B I A
O F
S T R U C T U R E S
C O S T
O F
C O L U M -
W A S H I N G -
A R E
T O
I M P R O V E M E N T
B E
H A S
I T
O V E R - A L L
CONGESTION
N.
WARRANT
G R E E L E Y
EARLY
W O U L D
N O T
P R O J E C T
E X I S T I N G
A V E N U E
A N D
B E
AT
ON
N .
N E C E S S A R Y
AN
EARLY
I N T E R S T A T E
T I L L A M O O K
T O
C O N -
D A T E ,
THE
AVENUE
B E -
S T R E E T
S H O U L D
A T T E N T I O N .
O F
D A Y
I N
A N D
N .
I N T E R - S T A T E
P O R T L A N D ,
V E H I C L E S
O FTHESE
VEHICLES
WILL
U S E
FREEWAY.
A C R O S S
E A C H
THROUGHOUT
LENGTH
(MILES)
N . E .
B R I D G E S
T H E
T H E
B Y
B E
T H E
C O L U M B I A
W I L L
B E
INTERCHANGE.
REMAINDER
OF
T O
P L A N N E D
SOUTH
THE
FREE-
C O S T
TO
W A S H I N G T O N
P E R
A N D3 0 . 0 0 0
W I L L
A N D
C O N C E R N E D ,
T O L L
A L T H O U G H
T H I S
1 O N
FROM
V A N C O U V E R .
5 0 , 0 0 0
A S
A C R O S S
J O I N T L Y
O F
8 0 , 0 0 0
LAURELHURST
X L A N E S
AND
S O M E
I N S O F A R
J S
B R I D G E S
O N L Y
N O R T H
S T R E E T
O F
O N E - W A Y
A U T H O R I T Y
A N D
T O
BE
T R A F F I C .
M I N I M U M
V E H I C L E S
F L O W
TO
BRIDGES
N O T
S E C T I O N
W A S H I N G T O N , A N D
O N E - W A Y
A N D S
OF
T O T A L
T H E
F R E E W A Y
O F
FROM
T H E
4 0 , 0 0 0
A M O U N T
ONT H EPROPOSED
R I V E R
R A N G E
O N
T H R O U G H
A N D T O U R I S T
I N
TRAFFIC M A Y
A S SHOWN
P A I D .
S T R U C T
C O M P L E T I N G
W A S H I N G T O N
K I L L I N G S W O R T H
T H E
ONT H E TWIN
T H E
F R E E W A Y
P E R
F O R
H I G H W A Y
M O V E M E N T
V E H I C L E S
V A N C O U V E R ,
BY
C A R E S
I N T E R S T A T E
V A N C O U V E R .
I T I S EXPECTED
REMAIN
THIS
T H I S
A V E N U E .
B E T W E E N
D A Y .
T H E
B E T W E E N
I N T E R S T A T E
PER
ON
B O U L E V A R D
T R A F F I C
L O C A T I O N
V E H I C L E S
S E C T I O N
O R E G O N ,
T O
T H E
B R I D G E
PRESENT
U S 9 9
B U T P A S S E N G E R
2 5 , 0 0 0
T H A T
T H E
TO
O F
F R E E -
STREET.
L I N K
P R O P O S E D
A R E
P R O P E R
TWEEN
T H E
LANES.
INTERCHANGES
INTER-
L O C A T I O N
T H E H A R B O R
T O FOUR
THROUGH
THE
S U B J E C T E D
I T
ALONG T H E
AVENUE
R I V E R
R I V E R
O N
U N T I L
B I A
D E P A R T M E N T
A R E A ;
S L O U G H
A LOCATION
B E CONSTRUCTED
PAGE.
U N I O N
A L O N G
V A N P O R T
S T R E E T S
I T WILL
T H E F A C I L I T Y
S L O U G H
A T
C O L U M B I A
W L L B U R
WAY
USE
OPPO S I T E
O N E - W A Y
U T I L I Z I N G
P R E S E N T
O F
COLUM-
S O U T H E R L Y
GREELEY
V I A D U C T
F R E E W A Y
O F
C O L U M B I A
AVENUE
I T FOLLOWS
T H E N C E
A V E N U E
A N D
T H E
ABOVE
U S 9 9
E X T E N D S
DENVER
AREA
A N D
T H E N
J U S T
T H E
BANK
S O U T H E R L Y
R I V E R
D E L A W A R E
OF THE BLUFF
STATE
OF
A V E N U E
B E T W E E N
W I T H
N O R T H
T R A F F I C
I T
ING
T H E
E X T E N D S
THE
L E A V E S
ON
N.
L O M B A R D
N.
K 1 L L 1NG S W O R T H
S T A D I U M
H A R B O R
1.16
A V E N U E
S T R E E T
S T R E E T
F R E E W A Y
D R I V E
F R E E W A Y
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LANES
NO.
50.000
GRAD1NG
&
STRUCTURES
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
(S)
PAVING
($)
0 . 6 1
35,000
135, 000
35,000
1.21
30 . 0 0 0
480 , 0 0 0
7 50 , 0 0 0
1.05
35.000
7 50 . 0 0 0
150.000
1 . 3 6
40.000
550,000
470 , 000
0 . 6 1
30 . 0 0 0
40,000
1 . 955,000
6 . 0 0
1 /
T O T A L
C O S T
R E L A T I N G
O F
O N E - W A Y
T H E R E T O
OB
B R I D G E S ,
EP A I D
T O L L
. 520 . 0 0 0
2 . 925 , 000
P L A Z A
1
F O R T H R O U G H
A N D
T O L L
~1
14. 000.000
170. 000
170.000
1 , 230 . 000
1 . 3 2 0 . 000
2.550.000
900 . 000
1 , 680 . 000
2,580.000
1.560.000
2 . 580.000
1 . 0 2 0 . 000
O T H E R
2 . 320 . 000
760 . 000
1,560.000
4 . 880 . 000
10.200.000
5 . 3 2 0 . 000
A D J U S T M E N T S
i
C O L L E C T I O N .
-70-
BEACH
N. PORTLAND
HARBOR
RIVER
COLUMBIA
JANTZEN
MODEL OF US99 FREEWAY CONNECTIONS IN VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON, TO DELAWARE
MODEL OF UNION AND DENVER AVENUE INTERCHANGE CONNECTIONS TO DELAWARE
FREEWAY AND TWIN INTERSTATE BRIDGES, LOOKING SOUTHWESTERLY.
FREEWAY WITH INTERSTATE BRIDGES IN BACKGROUND, LOOKING NORTHWESTERLY.
-71 -
F7-DELAWARE FREEWAY
TYPICAL
S E C T I O N S O U T H OF N . L O M B A R D S T R E E T , L O O K I N G N O R T H .
F7-DELAWARE FREEWAY
-72 -
TYPICAL ELEVATED SECTION ABOVE N. INTERSTATE AVENUE NORTH OF N. RUSSELL STREET
-73-
F7- DELAWARE FREEWAY
T H E
M A T E S
N O R T H
W I L L A M E T T E
B R I D G E
O
E A S T
S I D E
F R E E W A Y
T I O N
S E R V E S
L I N E S
T R A V E L
F L O W
FUNCTIONS
A N
S I D E
E A S T - W E S T
C A U S E
W I T H
O N
W H E N
D R I V E
D T O
L O C A T I O N
I T
T R A C T
H A V E
A N D
IT
E X P E C T E D
W I L L
T O
A N A V E R A G E
S O U T H
C R O S S I N G B E L O C A T I O N
F R E E W A Y ,
D A I L Y
6 0 , 0 0 0
H E A V I L Y
B E
S T R U C T U R E
T H E WEST
W I T H
I
U S 9 9 .
V E H I C L E S
A N D
W I L L
P A G E .
H A V E
M E A N - L O W
W A T E R .
WAY
STUDIED
1944
O F W A Y .
A L O N G
N A R R O W
O F
T H I S
O F
S U N S E T
F R E E W A Y
E V E R E T T
I N D U S T R I A L
T O T A L
F R E E W A Y
B Y
F O R T H I S
T H ELINE
T H E C I T Y
O F
I S A S
TO
E V E R E T T
I N D U S T R I A L
N.
S H I F T
B E
M A D E
I N D U S T R I A L
H I G H - L E V E L
S T R U C T U R E
A R E A
T O
U N T I L
D E -
S O M E
5F
E A S T - W E S T
BE
W H E R E A S
MADE
B U S I N E S S
W I L L
BETWEEN
RESIDENTIAL
B E
L O C A L
B Y
T O
F R E E W A Y
T W O U L D
T E N D
W I T H I N
S O M E W H A T
S H I F T I N G
O F
A N D THIS
T O
S O
O N
L O C A T I O N
INDUSTRIAL.
W I T H -
T H E
H
S E V E R A L
D I R E C T
T O
E N C I R C L I N G
A C C O M P L I S H E D
I M P R O V E
T H A T
T H E
T H E
G R O W T H
D C O N S T R U C T I O N
E S T R E E T S
F O R
D I S T R I C T
I T S F U T U R E
N E C E S S A R Y
L O C A -
E X P E N D I T U R E
1 8 T H A V E N U E ,
THE NORTHWEST
AREAS
D I S T R I C T
O F
E I M P R O V E M E N T
I
W E R E
B U S I N E S S
C O N S T R I C T I O N
I N
T H E 1 8 T HA V E N U E
L E S S E R
O F 1 4 T HA V E N U E ,
W E S T E R L Y
EC E N T R A L
T H A T
F O R A
W E S T .
S T A D I U M
O F
A C C E S S
T H E
C A N
WHOLESALE AND
FREEWAY.
S H O W N
B E O N EO F
F 1
F R E E W A Y ,
W I L L
T H E
A R E A .
A N DT H E
F S U S P E N S I O N
T
T Y P E
.
A B O V E
P A R T I C U L A R
F R E E -
OF 14TH AVENUE.
P O R T L A N D
B R I D G E
T O
C O U L D
.O
S T R E E T .
F O U N D
T H EC E N T R A L
F R E E W A Y
T H E
8 0 , 0 0 0
T H R O U G H O U T
P R O P O S E D
N O TB E P O S S I B L E
T H E N O R T H W E S T
M O R E O V E R .
C O N F I N E S :
W I L L
B E O
5 F
THE
A N D T H E
S T A T E
C O S T
N . W .
S T R E E T
M A D E
I N
C L E A R A N C E
L O C A T I O N S
ALONG
B R I D G E
A C C E S S
T W I L L
S I X L A N E S
W I L L
T O
W A SA L S O
R I G H T
E N C I R C L E
W I L L
O F T H E F R E E W A Y
O F S U C H
I N T O
N E C E S S A R Y
A C C E S S E S
I T W O U L D
C A N B E A C C O M P L I S H E D
FROM
N . W .
S T U D Y
F R E E W A Y S
V E R T I C A L
A L T E R N A T E
WERE
T H U S ,
T O
U S E O
T R A F F I C
B Y 1 9 7 5 O F S O M E
P E RD A Y .
T H ER I V E R
M U L T I P L E
S E C T I O N
A N DA
T O T H EN O R T H W E S T
O F N . W . L O V E J O Y
I T
T I O N
A L S O
N O R T H - S O U T H
T H EF R E M O N T
T R A F F I C
T R A V E L E D
A C R O S S
T H I S
S O T H A T
T H EL O C A T I O N
P O I N T
F R E E W A Y S .
A N DT H A T
T H E S O U T H E R L Y
S O M E
W I L L
T H A T
C A U S E
I T
M A P O N O P P O S I T E
M O R E
F8 - STADIUM FREEWAY (US99-US30 ALTERNATE)

SUNSET FREEWAY - FREMONT FREEWAY
I T S E L F
T H A T
C A R R Y
O N
W A T E R
L I M I T S
H O W E V E R ,
F M A I N T A I N I N G
I T B E C A M E
1 4 T HA V E N U E .
T R A F F I C .
P R O P E R
W E S T E R L Y
L O C A T I O N .
M E A N - L O W
O U T
F R E E W A Y
W E R E
A L O N G
T H I S
H A R B O R .
R E A S O N A B L E
A R E A .
M A D E
L O C A -
B E T W E E N
T H E L O W E R
W I T H I N
U S E D
E R E Q U I R E M E N T
V E L O P
AROUND
T H E
D E S I R E
C O U P L E D
A N D S U N S E T
A C R O S S
F T
B R I D G E S A N D
I N
ROUTING
D E P A R T M E N T
C L E A R A N C E
T H E
H I G H W A Y
T H I S
I N T E R S E C -
A V E N U E
A N DS T E E L
P O R T L A N D .
S U S P E N S I O N
S U C H
B R I D G E
D I S T R I C T
T H I S
E X I S T .
H A R B O R
F R E E W A Y ,
H I G H W A Y
P O R T L A N D
F O R T H EN O R T H - S O U T H
D R I V E ,
R E L I E V E
B A N F I E L D
A P P R O X I -
C R O S S E S
I N T E R S E C T I O N
T H EB U R N S I D E
B U S I N E S S
T H E N
T H R O U G H
U S E T H EB R O A D W A Y
H A R B O R
S l D E
E I G H T - L A N E
A V E N U E .
A SA CIRCUMFERENTIAL
C E N T R A L
A N D
I N W E S T
A N D G R E E L E Y
A N D W E S T
I N D U S T R I A L .
S E R V E
A V E N U E
R E L I E F
E X T E N T
N O R T H
E L E V A T E D
T W O - L E V E L
V A N C O U V E R
N O W M U S T
A P P R O X I M A T E L Y
A S A
L E S S E R
S I D E
A V E N U E
F R E E W A Y .
A
T E R M I N A T I N G
O F
T W E E N
O N
I N T E R S T A T E
M O N T
ES U N S E T
R I V E R
F N .
F R E E W A Y
O F 18 T H
A N D C R O S S E S
T I O N
TO
S T A D I U M
V A N C O U V E R
S T R E E T
F R E E W A Y
A V E N U E
(MILES)
TRAFFIC
( 1975)
(ADT)
LENGTH
LANES
No.
0 . 84
60 , 0 0 0
0 . 49
7 5 , 000
1 . 08
80 . 0 0 0
2.41
GRADING
&
STRUCTURES
PAviNG
($)
($)
20 , 0 0 0
'
2,640.000
2,130.000
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
<$)
($)
($)
2 . 6 6 0 . 000
2 . 040 . 000
4 . 700 . 000
2 . 1 3 0 . 000
3 . 380 . 0 0 0
5.510.000
17 . 500.000
1 7 . 5 0 0 , 000
1 . 440 . 000
18 . 9 4 0 . 0 0 0
20 , 0 0 0
22 . 2 7 0 . 0 0 0
2 2 , 290 . 0 0 0
6 . 860 . 000
29.150.000
1
I
r
j
-74-
INDUSTRIAL FREEWAY
-75-
F8 - STADIUM FREEWAY
THE
F R E M O N T
F R E M O N T
S T R E E T
K L I C K I T A T
S T R E E T .
L I N E
TRICTS
O F P O R T L A N D
FOR
M O V I N G
RELIEF
D E L A W A R E
T H I S
TO SOME
N O R T H E A S T
D I S T R I C T S
O F TRAFFIC
AS
TUNNEL
AS
AND
NO
THE
B E P O S S I B L E
T W OM A J O R
W H I C H
FREEWAY,
THE
O N E - W A Y
C O U P L E T
I T
B E T W E E N
R O U T I N G S .
S E C T I O N .
I N
T H R O U G H O U T
T H E
I T S
A C Q U I S I T I O N S
P R E V I O U S L Y ,
C A R E S F O R
T H E N O R T H
N O TO N L Y
T R I P S
A S
FREEWAYS:
GENERALLY
ROADS
A N D
O FR E S -
W E L L
A S A N
THUS. I T H A S
DIRECT
I N
I S
TUNNEL
MOST
LENGTH.
THAT
AND
OTHER
H A S BEEN
THE CASCADE
CONTEMPLATED
SECTION
I T S
BUTTE.
FREEWAY
STREETS
BETWEEN
OF
BE
STREETS
ASSUMED
ROCKY
T H I S
W I L L
F L A N K I N G
REPORT,
THROUGH
BETWEEN
FREEWAY
BE
T H I S
AND MAJOR
INTERCHANGE
FREMONT
S P E A K I N G ,
WITH
THROUGHOUT
OF
CONSTRUCTED
EXPRESSWAYS
W I L L
THE
E A S T E R L Y
C O M P O S E D
S E C T I O N
INSTANCE
BE
BETWEEN
O N E - W A Y
B E T W E E N
BETWEEN
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
(MILES)
1 5 T H - 1 6 T H
T O S I X L A N E S .
I S
LENGTH
TO
A V E N U E
T O
AS
THE
CROSSING
PLANFREEWAY
CASCADE
UNDER
THE
C O S T
FROM
V A N C O U V E R
F O R T R A F F I C
O F N . E .
A D J A C E N T ,
WOULD
S E C T 1 ON
N.
U T I L I Z A T I O N
I M M E D I A T E L Y
IT B E C O M E S
A V E N U E
L A N E S
MADE
A S S T A T E D
DEPRESSED
WILL
FREEWAY
T O FOUR
M O V I N G
INTERCHANGE
NED,
T H R O U G H
USAGE.
FRONTAGE
I N
FREEWAYS.
H O W E V E R ,
A N D I N T E R C H A N G E S
IS E X P E C T E D TO
SECTION
B U TH O M E - T O - W O R K
PURPOSE
THE
FREMONT FREEWAY (US30 ALTERNATE)

STADIUM FREEWAY ( N . VANCOUVER
AVENUE) - BANFIELD FREEWAY
T H E S E
D I S -
FREEWAY-,
A V E N U E
A L T E R N A T E
T H I S
WHEN
FREEWAY
T H E E X T R E M E
P R O V I S I O N S
F R E E W A Y ,
U S A G E
I S .
I N
T R A F F I C
I D E N T I A L
IT
O F US3O.
THE W E S T E R L Y
B E B U I L T
EXCHANGE
SERVING
W I L L
I S AN
FREEWAY
O F W A Y F O R E X P A N S I O N
T H I S
B U I L T
E A S T - W E S T
A N DN O R T H E A S T
A N D T H E 1 5 T H - 1 6 T H
W I T H
IN
1 0 , 0 0 0
W I L L
L E N G T H .
MULTIPLE
F R E M O N T
8 2 N D
SOUTH
L O C A T I O N
F O RA N
T I M E
R O U T E
ADT O N T H E F R E M O N T
F R E E W A Y
R I G H T
T H ENORTH
H I G H W A Y
35,000
FREEWAY
E N T I R E
OF
BETWEEN
C A R E S
O F
O F
J U S T
IN C A P A C I T Y .
FROM
C O U P L E T
F R E E W A Y
FOR THE BANFIELD
THE
RANGE
I S L O C A T E D
T H E G E N E R A L
A N DA T T H E SAME
T H E I N T E R S T A T E
DEFICIENT
F9
T H I S
D E S I R E
ALLOW
F R E E W A Y
A P P R O X I M A T I N G
1 5 T H - 1 6 T H
O N E - W A Y
C O U P L E T
FREEWAY
LANES
NO.
1 . 36
35 . 0 0 0
1 . 29
25.000
GRADING
&
STRUCTURES
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
<$)
(*)
(*)
PAVING
($)
1 . 0 3 0 . 000
910 , 0 0 0
1 , 940.000
620,000
720 , 000
1.390,000
590 . 0 0 0
5.540.000
1.340,000
3 , 600 . 000
3 . 940 . 000
1 . 980 , 000
3 , 600 . 000
5,580,000
1 . 420 . 000
1 . 0 1 0 . 000
2 , 340 . 0 0 0
6.220,000
5, 2 8 0 . 0 0 0
N . E .
S A N D Y
C A S C A D E
F R E E W A Y
B O U L E V A R D
F R E E W A Y
TOTAL
N . E .
S A N D Y
C A S C A D E
B A N F I E L D
B O U L E V A R D
F R E E W A Y
F R E E W A Y
1 . 50
35.000
0.64
20 . 0 0 0
700 , 000
1 . 42
10 . 0 0 0
530 . 0 0 0
4 . 270.000
6.21
-76-
220.000
4 , 6 8 0 , 000
7 , 1 20.000
920 , 0 0 0
5 . 2 1 0 . 000
11.390,000
13 , 570.000
24,960.000
-77-
F9-FREMONT
FREEWAY (US 30 ALTERNATE)
A/
ROCKY
BUTTE
F9-FREMONT FREEWAY (US 30 ALTERNATE)
-78-
ROCKY BUTTE TUNNEL PORTALS. LOOKING EAST
-79-
THE
E A S T
S I D E
M A T E
L O C A T I O N
R E F E R E N C E
D E S I R E
W H I C H
F R E E W A Y
S H O W S
C O U L D
A R E E X P E C T E D
C O L U M B I A
N E C T S
AN
AS
F10 - LAURELHURST FREEWAY (US99 ALTERNATE)

COLUMBIA RIVER - PORTLAND-SALEM FREEWAY
D I S T R I C T
T H I S
W I L L
V O L U M E
A S W E L L
A
A T T H ES A M E
A L T E R N A T E
T I M E
S T U D I E S
A S O F
B R I D G E
C O L U M BIA
E X P R E S S W A Y
FREMONT
F
R E E WA Y
F R E M O N T
F R E E W A Y
EAST
B U R N S I D E
S T R E E T
MT.
HOOD
H O O D
F R E E W A Y
SELLWOOD
S E L L W O O D
F R E E W A Y
OATFIELD
S O A S
ROAD
ROAD
E X P R E S S W A Y
H I G H W A Y
OSWEGO
FREE-
A C C E S S
N E I G H B O R H O O D S
T H E
WOULD
W O U L D
B E
F R E E W A Y .
I S R E A L I Z E D
T H A T
T H EH O L L Y W O O D
D O E S
B U S I N E S S
O F W A Y I
S T O O G R E A T
I N V E S T I G A T I O N
N E A R
3 0 T H
N O T P E R M I T
W I L L
A V E N U E
T H E S E
O F
D I S T R I C T
A N D
B E M A D E
O R
N E A R
R A T H E R
T H I S
A N D
I F
T H E
O F
4 5 T H
D E T A I L E D
N O W ,
T O
A C C O M M O D A T I N G
T R A F F I C .
LANES
GRADING
&
PORTLAND-
No.
30 . 0 0 0
30 . 0 0 0
1 ,49
40 . 0 0 0
1
.050.000
690 . 000
45 . 0 0 0
840 . 000
1 . 29
50 . 0 0 0
2.74
45 . 000
3 . 53
28.000
1 . 79
1 2 . 000
5.00
8 . 000
.210. 000
, 850 . 0 0 0
950.000
550,000
20 .83
,320.000
.460.000
OREGON
-80-
5 0
R/W
TOTAL
<$)
(*)
($)
P E R
CEN
T
4 , 2 50.000*
. 250
4 1 0
. 000*
. 000
500
. 000
4
1 . 460 , 000
, 1 40
390 . 000
. 000
2
. 930
.000
. 540
2
. 000
1
. 1 30
FREEWAY
'S
CONSTR.
($)
($)
STRUCTURES
PAviNG
E X P R E S S W A Y
Hi
SALEM
TOTAL
B E A C C O M M O D A T E D - M A J O R
A L L
I N T E R S E C T I N G
W A S H I N G T O N .
1 . 00
GH w A Y
O S W E G O
S T R E E T S
B U S I N E S S
FREEWAY
O A T F I E L D
S O T H A T
I L L U S T R A T I O N
S P E A K I N G
OF
S T R E E T
FREEWAY
M T .
O N T H E
C O N N E C T I O N F O R
2.18
1.81
BURN
SIDE
E A S T
A R I S E .
S E R V E S
EXPRESSWAY
C O L U M B I A
M A J O R
WOULD
T O OM A N Y .
A V E N U E .
NORTH
B E A S SHOWN
L O C A T I O N S
A C R O S S
A N D L O C A L
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LENGTH
(MILES)
R I V E R
B U T T H A T
N O R T H E R L Y
C O S T
TO
D R I V E
T I M E
O F I N T R A - S T A T E
O B J E C T I O N S
U S 9 9
T H EN E E D
P U R -
CONSTRUC-
S E C T I O N .
F O RU L T I M A T E
NOTED
TUNNEL
F O R
BE
O A KGROVE
B U T GENERALLY
O F T H E R I G H T
O F
C E N T R A L
D I R E C T
C O S T
O F
H I G H W A Y
S L D E
T H E
B R I D G E C O N -
A S V A N C O U V E R .
M O R E
I T
B I S E C T S
V O L U M E S
R O U T I N G
I N
FROM
C O L U M B I A
WITH
B E P L A N N E D
T O U S ET H I S
M I N I M U M
S T R U C T U R E
L I N E
A N D
F R E E W A Y
A B L E
F R E E W A Y
T H E
I N 1 9 7 5 R A N G I N G
R I V E R
WOULD
T H EE N T I R E
FROM
BE
I S
A S S U M E D
LANES
S H O U L D
W O U L D
PAGE
A L S O
I T S E N T I R E
T O A
I N T E R S T A T E
O F
O N A N YO F
P R O J E C T I O N .
S T A T E
T I
0
M A R I N E
L O A D S
P O R T I O N
T H EW E S T
W A Y S ,
T H E Y
I S , N O R T H
T H R O U G H O U T
FREEWAY
A S
FOUR
B E A C Q U I R E D
O F T R A F F I C
A C C E S S
B O U L E V A R D .
T H EU S EO F T H I S
A L L O W
M O V E M E N T
- T H A T
C O L U M B I A
T H I S
T H R O U G H
O F P O R T L A N D
F R E E W A Y
OF
F O RU S 9 9
T R A F F I C
O R L E S S
N E WP R O P O S E D
S U C H
W A S H I N G T O N .
A N A L T E R N A T E
R E L I E V E
O N A
T H E OPPOSITE
A V E N U E .
O F T H E O V E R - A L L
I T H A S V O L U M E S
R I V E R .
EXTENSION
V A N C O U V E R .
T I M E -
T R A F F I C
S O U T H E R L Y
ON
A S W I L L
G I V E
F O R T H I S
O F 3 0 T H
O F P O W E L L
C A R R I E S
I N T H E C E N T R A L
O N I T SM O S T
3 0 , 0 0 0
T H E
F R E E W A Y
T H EW A S H I N G T O N
T H E F R E E W A Y
C O N T R O L S A N D
P A G E .
I T H A S BEEN
THAT
THROUGH
O F W A YWOULD
S I XL A N E S
T O
O F T H EF R E E W A Y .
ON T H EO P P O S I T E
REPORT
A T T H EO U T S E T
R I G H T
O F T H EL O C A T I O N ,
D U ET O T O P O G R A P H I C
S E C T I O N .
O F T H I S
OF
L I N E
A N DS O U T H
ON V I A D U C T
TO
B E W E L L
MORE
OR
E X P R E S S W A Y
I T W O U L D
R E M A I N
SOME
A R EN O T B U I L T
T H E L O C A T E D
A T T H EP R E S E N T
I N T H EA R E A .
5 0 , 0 0 0
C O U P L E T
UP A R E A S .
T H E I L L U S T R A T I O N
TED
O F
M O S T
H O W E V E R ,
ON
POSES
D E S I R E
A N D 4 5 T H
T H EE A S T S I D E
E X T R E M I T I E S
O N EO F T H EH E A V I E R
F R E E W A Y S
F R O M
D A T E .
W O U L D
E X P R E S S W A Y
T H I S
S E C T I O N
T H A T
2 5 T H
D E P R E S S E D ;
B U I L T
I T S P R E S E N T
B E T W E E N
T O I N T H E V I C I N I T Y
F R E E W A Y
A P P R O X I -
D I R E C T I O N A L
[ N
A V E N U E .
O N E - W A Y
A N DS O U T H E R L Y
C O N C E I V E D
C O L U M B I A
8 , 0 0 0
3 O T H
I S
O F T H E A R E A .
O N M A J O R
B E A N Y W H E R E
E A R L Y
O N A N
M O S T
F R E E W A Y
T H R O U G H O U T
T H E C E N T R A L
O F T H EN O R T H - S O U T H
T O S H I F T I N G
W E S T E R L Y
N O R T H E R L Y
A R E
E A S T
A V E N U E
R E A S O N A B L Y
F R E E W A Y
T H R O U G H
T H I S
A N D I N T H EE V E N T
C O N S I D E R A T I O N
T H E
T H A T
A P P R O X I M A T E S
T H E 1 5 T H - 1 6 T H
A
O F P O R T L A N D
A V E N U E
I S S O M E W H A T
T H I S
A T
T R A V E R S E S
T O T H E I L L U S T R A T I O N
L I N E
A V E N U E S
F R E E W A Y
A R E A
O F 3 9 T H
L I N E S
L O C A T I O N
A N D
S H A
R E
OF
COST.
1 6
560 . 0 0 0
. 000
. 850
. 000
1.190, 0 0 0
1 50
. 000
200
2
. 000
. 290
4 , 980 , 000 3
. 000
. 1 70
1 . 600 . 0 0 0 2
. 000
. 690
4
4.780. 000
. 000
. 740
2
2 . 490,000
. 000
. 300
1
2 , 6 8 0 . 000
. 000
. 050
1 . 880 . 000
220 . 000
, 000
1 6
2 5 . 3 1 0 .000
.810
. 000
. 000
. 400. 0 0 0
. 660
o
. 000
. 480
. 000
8
1
. 1 50
. 000
. 290
. 000
. 520
4
. 000
. 790
3
,0 00
.730
2
. 000
. 1 00
42
. 000
9
. 1 20
M B I A
C 0L U
RIVER
N.E. 4IST AVE.
N.E, 3 9 T H AVE.
39TH AVE.
-81 -
SE.
39TH
AVE.
FIO- LAURELHURST
FREEWAY
ST.
37TH
40 TH
ST.
w
37 TH
FIO-LAURELHURST FREEWAY
- 82-
ST.
FIO-LAURELHURST
-83-
FREEWAY
T H E
M A T E
R I V E R
B R I D G E S
T H E
S E R V I C E
D R I V E
W A Y S
N T
U N I O N - G R A N D
A V E N U E
S O M E
A N D
W O U L D
AND
C O M M E R C I A L
P A R T S
E O
B E E N
T E N D I N G
T R A F F I C
A R M Y
F R E E -
E V E R .
N O T
R E T
A N D
T H I S
L I N E
S T R E E T
L O C A T I O N
N T
A C C O U N T
OT H ER I V E R
B R I D G E .
M I G H T
N A
T E R M I N A L
T W O U L D
I
E B R O U G H T
C O M B I N E D
O
SC O N S I D E R E D
P R O J E C T
F A
RF O R
N T H I S
P A R T I C I P A T I O N
T H E
F A C I L I T I E S
B R I D G E .
ED E V E L O P M E N T
F O R C O M B I N E D
AW A L L
FC E R T A I N
T H E B U R N S I D E
R E S U L T I N G
T H EL O C A T I O N ,
T OG OU N D E R
E N G I N E E R S
A D J A C E N T
N L O C A T I O N
FT H E M O R R I S O N
T H A T
H A R B O R
E A S T
T O
L O A D S
S I B L E
W O U L D
D R I V E
F A C I L I T I E S
D E S I R A B L E
H A R B O R
F R E E W A Y
DH A R B O R
T H U S ,
N O R T H
B R I D G E .
R O U T I N G
T H E I R
S H I F T I N G
W I L L A M E T T E
. H O O D
N
O F
A P P R O X I -
W I L L A M E T T E
T H E N
T I
U
TT
W I T H T
A W A L L . H
R E P O R T ,
SP O S -
D O E S
I N T H E F R E E W A Y
P R O J E C T S .
C O U P L E T .
N T H I S
F R E E W A Y
P
W I T H
R D
Y B
Y 1
T O F O U R - L A N E
V O L U M E
L E S S E R
A M O U N T
E X P E C T E D
S T A N D A R D S
O F
V O L U M E
I N D U S T R I A L
O F
O F I N T E R - C I T Y
H O M E - T O -
A N D
L O C A L
M O S T
S N O TN E C E S S A R Y
W O U L D
F I
S I
SL O C A T I O N
S E C T I O N
T I
S N O T C E R T A I N
W H A T
B E T W E E N
E
O
T OC O N S T R U C T
F O RT H EP U R P O S E S
B EE N C O U N T E R E D
. E V E N
F R E E W A Y
N
T H O S E
T S O .
D E V E L O P I N G
F O U N D A T I O N
T H EM O R R I S O N A N D
BRIDGES.
O V E R C R O S S I N G
F T H E B U R N S I D E
B R I D G E
EAST BANK FREEWAY
FREEWAY
MT.
B E E N
HOOD FREEWAY
R O A D
O C C A S I O N E D
E C T
VERTICAL
Y A R D S
B E C A U S E
C L E A R A N C E
FB
BETWEEN
T H E
T O
D E V E L O P
E X I S T I N G
RAIL-
F R E E W A Y
A N D
YT H ET I M E
T H I S
F R E E W A Y
A N Y A R R A N G E M E N T S
C A N B EM A D E
F O R
WITH
T H E
C O N -
THE O P E R A T -
T H E A B A N D O N M E N T
O F CERTAIN
C O S T
TO
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LENGTH
(MILES)
M T .
HOOD
F R E E W A Y
25,OOO
1 . 86
1 . 86
TOTAL
I M P O S S I B L E
ON
FROM
F R E E W A Y
B A N K
S T R U C T E D
C O M P A N I E S
E A S T
B R I D G E .
R A I L R O A D
D T H EP R O P O S E D
B U R N S I D E
ING
D R I V E
T
A
B R I D G E ,
N E L E V A T E D
E S T I M A T E S
ADEQUATE
H A R B O R
E M
A N A P P R E C I A B L E
N O M I N A L
T I
T H E
HARBOR DRIVE
B E B U I L T
S OD E S I G N E D
HAWTHORNE
S U C H
V E H I C L E S
T R A F F I C
N A
W H E R E
P R O B L E M S
F11
F T
R I V E R
C O M P L E M E N T S
E D E L A W A R E
V O L U M E S
T H R O U G H O U T
C O S T
E E X I S T I N G
D A N T I C I P A T E D
W O U L D
A N D A
F I C .
W O U L D
H A S
O N E - W A Y
S E R V I C E
T R I P S
T R A F
D T
2 5 , 0 0 0
S E C T I O N
O F T H E
W I L L A M E T T E
S I D E .
S T E E L
T R A F F I C
WORK
S A L O N G
L I N E
F T
F R E E W A Y
E W E S T
O F T H E
A V E R A G E
EP R O P O S E D
H A R B O R
E X I S T I N G
E N T I R E
F T H I S
A V E N U E ,
N O R T H
L I E V E
F R E E W A Y
F O U R
DO
G R E A T E R
U N I O N
F R E E W A Y
G I V E
T O
B A N K
O F T H E E A S T
I N T E R C E P T I N G
R I V E R
O F
E A S T
L O C A T I O N
LANES
NO.
GRADING &
PAVING
STRUCTURES
CONSTR.
R/W
($)
($)
($)
($)
7 , 200 . 0 0 0
7 , 200 , 000
3 . 500 , 0 0 0
7 , 200 , 000
7,200,000
3 . 500 . 000
TOTAL
($)
"1
1
10,700.000
10,700.000
T
1
-j
1
L
-84-
WILLAME TTE
RIVER
N.
WILLIAMS
AVE
-85-
F l l - EAST BANK FREEWAY
THE
C A S C A D E
L I N E
O F N O R T H - S O U T H
T I O N
O FP O R T L A N D .
D R I V E
S O U T H E R L Y ,
S T O N E ,
T O A N
P A C I F I C
F R E E W A Y
T R A V E L
S E R V E S
T E X T E N D S
E A S T ,
S E C O N D A R Y
8 2 N D
A V E N U E
C O N N E C T I O N
U S 9 9 E ,
F R O M
M O N T
T H E R E
G L A D -
O F
T H E P R E S E N T
S T R E E T )
I N
A N D B A N F I E L D
T U N N E L
M A R I N E
T H R O U G H
W I T H
( W A T E R
D E S I R E
E A S T E R L Y P O R -
O N T H EN O R T H
P A R A L L E L I N G
H I G H W A Y
I N T H EE X T R E M E
SO N E S E C T I O N
F R E E W A Y
S H O W N
F R E E W A Y S
O NT H E
T I
SN E C E S S A R Y
S OA S T OM A I N T A I N
T H EJ O H N S O N
T H E
O R E G O N
S E C T I O N
C R E E K
T H A T
S O N V I A D U C T
E X P R E S S W A Y ,
S D E P R E S S E D
O P P O S I T E
O RA
T OD E V E L O P
A NO P T I M U M
W H I L E
T G R A D E .
G R A D E
L I N E .
I N T H E
V I C I N I T Y
S O U T H
T H E R E O F
A C C E S S
A S
P A G E .
C I T Y .
TRAFFIC
C L E S
T H I S
H I G H W A Y
VOLUMES
RANGING
P E R D A Y I N T H E M A R I N E
S E C T I O N
T OA
S E C T I O N
M A X I M U M
B E T W E E N
B O U L E V A R D .
M A D E
B EA
T R I P S
A R E A
L I N K
T H A T
O R E G O N
S A L S O
D E V E L O P S ,
I N T E G R A T E D
F E L T
T H A T
S U C H
I N T O
T H I S
F12 - CASCADE FREEWAY (0RE13)

MARINE DRIVE - OREGON CITY
I S P L A N N E D
B U T
T O P L A N
T H E
C E N T R A L
B I A
E X P R E S S W A Y
P O R T I O N S
THE ENTIRE
A R I S E S .
G E N E R A L L Y ,
T O P O G R A P H Y
I N T R A -
C E N T R A L
F L O C A L
F R O M
G L A D -
V A L L E Y
T H A T
A R E A S .
F
D E M A N D
R I V E R
I
O F T H I S
LENGTH
O N L Y
F O U R
C O U L D
T I
S T U D Y
C R E E K
F O R A D D I T I O N A L
T H EF R E E W A Y
D I C T A T E S
OF THIS
L A N E S
N O T
T H A T
B E T W E E N
L A N E S
I S D E P R E S S E D ;
I N T H EV I C I N I T Y
T R A F F I C
S O
T H A T
T H E C O L U M -
E X P R E S S W A Y
T R A F F I C
FREEWAY,
O F
F A C I L I T I E S
O F T H E F R E E W A Y
A N D J O H N S O N
T O CARE
W H E R E
P E R I O D
C O N N E C T I N G
H O W E V E R ,
O F W A Y A N D O T H E R
E X P A N D E D
V O L U M E
A I R P O R T
F R E E W A Y ;
T O C O N S T R U C T
R I G H T
A N D
T H E
D I R E C T
T H E R E
B E N E C E S S A R Y .
THROUGHOUT
I T
F R E E W A Y
O F T H EC O L U M B I A
T H ET I M E
W O U L D
L A R G E
A S A
A N DS O L O C A T E D
C R O S S I N G
D U R I N G
C R O S S I N G
A S A
T H E
P O W E L L
N A M E L Y .
T O B Y P A S S
A N D M I D - W I L L A M E T T E
D E S I G N E D
A N O T H E R
A N DS . E .
U S ET H I S
I N T E R N A T I O N A L
C I T Y ,
B O U L E V A R D
O F I N T E R - C I T Y
S E R V E
H A V E
VEHI-
P E RD A Y I N
C O M P O N A N T S ;
F R E E W A Y
A L S O
T O T H EP O R T L A N D
S T O N E .
W O U L D
A S W E L L
T W O U L D
V E H I C L E S
S T R E E T
V O L U M E
S U C H
O FP O R T L A N D
T R A F F I C .
B E
U S I N G
O F5,000
D R | V E - C O L U M B I A
D I F F E R E N T
B Y 1 9 7 5T O
A MINIMUM
B U R N S I D E
T R A F F I C
W O U L D
S E X P E C T E D
O F4 0 . 0 0 0
E .
U PO FS E V E R A L
S T A T E
I T
FROM
C O U L D B
A S D E M A N D
H O W E V E R
O F T H E
F R E -
S E C TION
C O S T
FROM
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LENGTH
TO
(MILES)
N.E.
M A R I N E
C O L U M B I A
D R I V E
E X P R E S S W A Y
F O S T E R
K I N G
R O A D
C R E E K
E X P R E S S W A Y
R O A D
C L A C K A M A S
TOTAL
($)
560 . 000
1 . 020.000
3 . 600 . 0 0 0
4.620.000
1.100. 000
H A S S A L O
S T R E E T
0.79
25 . 0 0 0
5 10. 000
1 . 200 , 000
1.710.000
850.000
0.51
35 . 000
340 . 000
1.75
40.000
1.320,000
3 10. 000
1.0 1
35 . 0 0 0
760,000
1 50 . 000
1.10
1 . 38
30 . 0 0 0
20,000
4
4
800.000
7 20 .000
230.000
300 , 0 0 0
1 . 030 . 0 0 0
370 . 000
1 . 0 20 . 0 0 0
1.020,000
1.400.000
2 . 040 . 000
2.76
1 5 , 000
440 , 000
1 , 540 , 000
740 . 0 0 0
2.280.000
3 , 49
1 8 . 000
1 , 580 . 000
370 . 000
E X P R E S S W A Y
B U R N S I D E
M T .
H O O D
S.E.
F O S T E R
J O H N S O N
K I N G
W A T E R
S T R E E T
F R E E W A Y
R O A D
C R E E K
E X P R E S S W A Y
R O A D
C L A C K A M A S
H I G H W A Y
($)
E.
S.E.
TOTAL
S T R E E T
J O H N S O N
($)
5 . 000
H A S S A L O
F R E E W A Y
R/W
($)
20 , 000
N.E.
H O O D
CONSTR.
($)
1 . 60
N.E.
M T.
STRUCTURES
S T R E E T
S T R E E T
S T R E E T
&
PAVING
S T A N T O N
C O L U M B I A
S T A N T O N
B U R N S I D E
GRADING
N.E.
N.E.
E.
LANES
NO.
H I G H W A Y
S T R E E T
E X P R E S S W A Y
1.83
1,100. 000
9 20.000
8 . 050,000
16.22
-86-
'
420 .000
230.000
660.000
7 . 540 . 0 0 0
980 . 000
570 . 0 0 0
1.630, 0 0 0
9 10. 0 0 0
80 . 0 0 0
830 . 0 0 0
1 ,060, 000
5.7 20. 0 0 0
2,560,000
1 . 400 , 0 0 0
1 . 980 . 000
3.610. 000
1 . 260.000
2.170. 000
1 5 . 590 . 0 0 0 8 . 6 0 0 . 0 0 0
1 .9 50 . 0 0 0
24,190,000
FI2-CASCADE FREEWAY
-87-
(ORE 213)
F12-CASCADE FREEWAY (ORE 213)

-88-
OREGON
PORTLAND
FI2 - CASCADE
-89-
TRACTION
FREEWAY
CO.
(ORE 213)
CITY
T H E
P O R T L A N D
M A T I N G
S T R E E T .
T
EI
B U S I N E S S
O F T HE
F R O M
3 0 . 0 0 0
V O L U M E S
W I T H
I
R O U T E
C I R C U M F E R E N -
W I T H
T H E
E X P R E S S W A Y
S O U T H
O F T H E C E N T R A L P O R -
P O R T I O N
B O U L E V A R D
W E S T E R L Y
F R E E W A Y
A N D A
A S A
T H R O U G H
T H E
S E R V E S
T H ES O U T H
O T H E R
F R E E W A Y
M O D I F I E D
N O R T H
T O 1 5 , 0 0 0
P O R T I O N .
I S
I N
H I G H - L E V E L
O S W E G O
H I G H W A Y
A V E N U E S .
R I G H T
MATE
A T
TO
S E L L W O O D
A R E A S
O F
T H EF R E E W A Y
I S
B E T W E E N
T H I S
OSWEGO
S . E .
M C L O U G H L I N
TOTAL
E X P R E S S W A Y
F R E E W A Y
C R E E K
1
1
A N D
T H E
W I T H
T O C A R E
S I X T H
L A U R E L -
T H R O U G H O U T
A N D
R O A D .
THE
S U F F I C I E N T
F O R
U L T I -
L A N E S .
S I X T H
LANES
No.
GRADING
&
STRUCTURES
CONSTR.
R/W
($)
($)
($)
($)
1.21
15,000
2 . 3 4 0 . 000
260 . 0 0 0
2 . 600 . 0 0 0
A V E N U E
30 . 0 0 0
60 . 0 0 0
2 . 6 6 0 . 000
2 . 7 2 0 . 000
E X P R E S S W A Y
0 . 98
30 , 0 0 0
740.000
830 . 000
1 . 570 . 000
1 . 00
24,000
490 . 000
470 , 000
3 , 6 3 0 . 000
4 . 2 2 0 . 000
F R E E W A Y
3.64
TOTAL
PAVING
0.45
H I G H W A Y
M C L O U G H L I N
O N A
J U S T
F E R R Y
A N D W I T H
A T T H E O U T S E T
T O S I X
I S
C R O S S I N G
O F S . E . N I N T H
B O U L E V A R D
T T H E J O H N S O N
O F W A Y A C Q U I R E D
A N D I T
R l V E R
S . W .T A Y L O R ' S
L A N E S
W H E R E
B R I D G E .
A R E M A D E
F R E E W A Y .
B E F O U R
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LENGTH
(MILES)
A V E N U E
I N D U S -
C O S T
FROM
H I G H W A Y
O F
C I R C U M F E R E N T I A L
S E C T I O N
S I X T H
T H A T
C O U -
C E M E T A R Y
S E C T I O N ,
I N T H E V I C I N I T Y
W I L L
O F I T S L E N G T H
T H ER L V E R V I E W
T U N N E L
S . E .M C L O U G H L I N
F R E E W A Y
F R E E W A Y
S . E .
P E R
T R A F F I C
A M O U N T
N A
1 3 T H
V E H I C L E S
W I L L A M E T T E
O F T H E P R E S E N T
H U R S T
OSWEGO
V A R Y
S . E .
M I N I M U M
L I N K
C E N T R A L
M O S T
T H A N
T H E
F R E E W A Y
G I V E S
F R E E W A Y
B E T W E E N
I S P R I M A R I L Y
T A L S O
T H R O U G H O U T
M U L T N O M A H
C R E E K
R T L A N D .
D E P R E S S E D
F13 - SELLWOOD FREEWAY

PORTLAND-SALEM FREEWAY - LAURELHURST FREEWAY
A P P R O X I -
B R I D G E A N D
O F T H E C E N T R A L
B Y 1 9 7 5O N T H I S
N T H EC E N T R A L
T H E E X T R E M E
T R I A L .
PC
U S E T H I S
P L E D
F O R A
S O U T H
C O U P L E D
R O U T E
A N DM C L O U G H L I N
I N
S O U T H W E S T
L I N E
C l T Y .
T R A F F I C
W O U L D
S E L L W O O D
C A R E S
S Y S T E M
A N D W H E N
C R O S S - T O W N
T I O N
D A Y
R O U T I N G
A N D T H E J O H N S O N
C O N T I N U O U S
A L O N G
O F T H EP R E S E N T
T H I S
A R E A
C O N N E C T S
P O R T L A N D
N T H E F R E E W A Y
E X P R E S S W A Y
A V E N U E
F R E E W A Y
S O U T H E A S T
T A C O M A
T I A L
S E L L W O O D
W I T H
200 . 0 0 0
($)
i
2 . 800 . 000
_j
80 . 0 0 0
2 . 800 . 000
740.000
2.310.000
960 . 000
360 . 000
1.320.000
7.850.000
1 . 380 . 000
9 . 230 . 000
r
i
90-
TERWILLIGER
BLVD.
- 91 -
FI3-SELLWooD FREEWAY
T H E
G R O W I N G
W I T H
S I D E
C E N T R A L
O N E - W A Y
S T R E E T S
WAY.
U N D E R
B O U L E V A R D
THE
IN
THE
T H I S
THE
MATELY
FREEWAY
I S
P E R D A Y A N D I S
SUNSET
T W O - L A N E
CONGESTED
I N
C R E S T
OF
! N
O F
G L E N C U L L E N .
D I R E C T L Y
THROUGH
TO CARRY
D E V E L O P I N G
FREEWAYS
THROUGH
A T
S E C T I O N
TRAFFIC
GLENCULLEN.
EXPECTED
V I T A L
T U N N E L
T U N N E L
A N DC O N N E C T S
HIGHWAY
F R E E W I T H
A N DL E A V E S T H E
N O R T H E A S T
A N DP O R T L A N D - S A L E M
BECOME
T W I N
A V E N U E
COMMUNITY
A R T E R I A L
D R I V E
A T A N
M I L E
S . W . 4 5 T H
T O T H E W E S T
A N D H A R B O R
A N DC O U N C I L
O N EH A L F
R A P I D L Y
D I R E C T L Y
A N DB Y O T H E R
A N DR E M A I N S
BEAVERTON-HILLSDALE
INTERCHANGE
V E H I C L E S
S T A R T S
T H E
O F P O R T L A N D
C O N N E C T I N G
B R I D G E
A N DE N T E R S
H I L L
U N D E R C R O S S E S
WITH
C O U P L E T
D I S T R I C T
B O U L E V A R D
S E C T I O N
C O N N E C T S
S O U T H W E S T
I S L A N D
F R E E W A Y
M A R Q U A M
T U N N E L
I T
S T R E E T
B U S I N E S S
T E R W I L L I G E R
F R E E W A Y
A R E A
T O T H ER O S S
T H I S
B A R B U R
G L E N C U L L E N
WHICH
TRAFFIC
SOME
1 5 , 0 0 0
R E L I E F
W I L L
F O R
U L T I -
DEMAND.
F14 - GLENCULLEN FREEWAY

BARBUR BOULEVARD - BEAVERTON-HILLSDALE HIGHWAY
S E C T I O N
C O S T
TO
FROM
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LENGTH
(MILES)
BARBUR
BOULEVARD
TOTAL
GLENCULLEN
1 5,000
2 . 54
2.54
-92-
LANES
NO.
4
GRADING
&
STRUCTURES
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
PAVING
($)
($)
400 , 000
1 8 , 1 0 0 , 000
18 , 500 . 0 0 0
500 , 0 0 0
19. 000,000
400 . 0 0 0
1 8 , 1 0 0 , 000
18,500,000
500 . 0 0 0
19. 000.000
- 93-
FI4-GLENCULLEN FREEWAY
EXPRESSWAYS
95-
T H I S
C A P A C I T Y
F A C I L I T Y
A N D WILL
TION
THE
S E C T I O N S
BETWEEN
T O T A L
R A I S E D
R E E D W A Y
COUPLET
S T R E E T A N D
M E D I A N
A T
S . E .
A L LOTHER
MAJOR
T R A F F I C
R O U T I N G S .
W I L L
PER
D A Y I N 1 9 7 5 .
WAY
AND FREEWAY
GREATER
P E N D I N G
C O M P L E T I O N
MCLOUGHLIN
OF
I N T R A -
T O SOME
SUCH
FREEWAY A N D
A N D I N T E R -
2 5 , 0 0 0
V E H I C L E S
O F THESE
BOULEVARD
A S
T H A T ,
I N T H EA R E A
T H EL A U R E L H U R S T
AMOUNT
ROUTES.
B EM A I N T A I N E D
IMPROVEMENTS
S T I L L
VOLUME
W I L L
A N D I T I S E X P E C T E D
E X P R E S S -
WILL
CARRY
TRAFFIC.
C O S T
TO
C O U P L E T
I N T E R -
ONE-WAY
STREET
TRAFFIC
LENGTH
(1975)
(MILES)
A V E N U E
AVENUE
FROM
U N I O N - G R A N D
O F T R A F F I C
EXPRESSWAY.
T H EE A S T S I D E
EVEN
I N T E R -
A L LM I N O R
(US99E)
AVENUES- REEDWAY
L A N E S
I N E X I S T E N C E
AS
AN
F E W MAJOR
O F S . E .D I V I S I O N
N O T W I T H S T A N D I N G
C I T Y
O F A
LENGTH.
O F T R A F F I C
S T R E E T .
FOUR
BOULEVARD EXPRESSWAY
T H EU N I O N - G R A N D
O V E R - T A X E D
T H E CONSTRUC-
I T S ENTIRE
TO C R O S S - T R A F F I C
P R E S E N T L Y
O T H E R
THROUGH
T H E I N S T A L L A T I O N
A N DT H EC H A N N E L I Z A T I O N
T E R M I N A T I O N
T O I N C R E A S E T H E
A L R E A D Y
THROUGHOUT
A N D C L O S I N G
ARE
MCLOUGHLIN
MEDIAN
O FP A R K I N G .
S I G N A L S .
REEDWAY
BE ACCOMPLISHED
S E C T I O N S
THE
E1
I S N E C E S S A R Y
O N A N E X I S T I N G
OFA RAISED
P R O H I B I T I O N
T E R M I N U S
STEPHENS-UNION-GRAND
P R O J E C T
T R A F F I C
S T R E E T
(ADT)
25.000
2.25
2.25
LANES
NO.
4
GRADING
ft
($)
($)
250 . 000
250 , 0 0 0
-96*
STRUCTURES
PAVING
'
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
250.000
250,000
250.000
-
250.000
VANCOUVER
MCLAUGHLIN BOULEVARD
EXPRESSWAY
MULTNOMAH CO^
CLACKAMAS~~~CO.
WEST LINN!
-97 -
T H I S
HOOD
I S
O N V I R G I N
J U N C T I O N
I S
A L I G N M E N T
U S 2 6 .
I S
O F
TWO LANES
E X T E N D I N G
W E S T
S E P A R A T E D
ALTHOUGH
I S
R E Q U I R I N G
N E C E S S A R Y
SOME
T H E USAGE
TO
E V E N
THOUGH
FULL
CONTROL
O F
B U I L D
O F
I N
T H I S
I T
TO
T H E C I T Y
FOUR
I S
G R A D E .
I T
V E H I C L E S
F E L T
BE
T H A T
P E R
WOULD
FREEWAY
WAY W I L L
WITH
I M P O R T A N T
TO 8 , 0 0 0
I T
T H I S
LANES
A N D WITH
C O M P L E T E
S O U T H -
M T . HOOD
O F S A N D Y .
TO
M T .
A N D
L L N N E M A N
THE EXISTING
EXPRESSWAY.
O F
FROM
A N D T H E N C E
S E P A R A T E D
5 , 0 0 0
A L L R I G H T S
O F
WITH
O F T H E
D E S C R I B E D ,
E A S T E R L Y
P R O P E R
TO BE CONSTRUCTED
P H Y S I C A L L Y
THERE
C O N T I N U A T I O N
P R E V I O U S L Y
G R E S H A M
J U S T
PLANNED
H A S BEEN
TO A N I N T E R S E C T I O N
H I G H W A Y .
HIGHWAY
WHICH
S O U T H
EASTERLY
THE
E X P R E S S W A Y
F R E E W A Y ,
D A Y
N O TB E
S T A N D A R D S
A C Q U I R E D
W I T H
ACCESS.
E2 MT. HOOD EXPRESSWAY (US26)

LlNNEMAN JUNCTION - SANDY
S E C T I O N
C O S T
TO
FROM
TRAFFIC
(197 5)
(ADT)
LENGTH
(MILES)
L I N N E M A N
H O G A N
J U N C T I O N
R O A D
TOTAL
H O G A N
"
M T .
R O A D
H O O D
H I G H W A Y
LANES
NO.
4 . 30
5 , 000
7 . 70
8 .000
1 2 . 00
GRADING
&
PAVING
($)
1.040,000
'
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
($)
1 , 340,000
380,000
1.720,000
300.000
1.825.000
150.000
1,975,000
250.000
2. 2 2 5 . 0 0 0
2 , 8 6 5 , 000
450.000
3,315,000
630.000
3 . 945.000
L
_.._
98-
STRUCTURES
1
i
_j
N
VANCOUVER
MT HOOD
-99-
EXPRESSWAY
T H I S
1 6 T H
A V E N U E
F R E E W A Y
WAY
S O U T H E R L Y
A T
R E E D W A Y
R I G H T S
O F
L E D ,
OF
I T
T H E
O F
HOOD
TO
A R E
A C C E S S
M A J O R
S T R E E T S
G R A D E .
SOME
IZED.
T H E I R
LY
AND
I T S
O F
T H E
B E
M A J O R
M A D E
I T S
I S
P A C I F I C
E N T I R E
F A C I L I T Y
D E V E L O P
S T R E E T S .
P E R
T H I S
D A Y
T R A F F I C
N O R T H
F A C I L I T Y
W I L L
T H R O U G H
B E
BE
WOULD
C L O S E D
B E T W E E N
COMPANY
1 9 7 5 .
C O N T R O L L E D
T O
B E
OR
M O S T
H A V E
S O U T H E R B O U L E V A R D
S E C T I O N
BROOKLYN
I N
S I G N A L -
W I L L
T H E
P O W E L L
E L E V A T E D
O F T H E
BY
S E P A R A T I O N
R E S T R I C T E D .
ON
L E N G T H
TO
B U T C O N N E C T I O N S
W I L L
E X P R E S S W A Y
B A N F I E L D
E X P R E S S -
C O N T R O L -
E X P R E S S W A Y
T H E 1 5 T H -
T H E
A N D A C C E S S E S
F A C I L I T Y
M O V E M E N T S
SOUTHERN
ON
L E N G T H
O F
T H E
T H I S
W I L L
M C L O U G H L I N
SOUTH
TO
C R O S S - T R A F F I C
P O R T I O N
V E H I C L E S
O F
B O U L E V A R D
E X I S T I N G
E X P E C T E D
E N T I R E
FOUR
M I N O R
O N
3 0 , 0 0 0
FREEWAY
T H R O U G H O U T
A C Q U I R E D
I M P R A C T I C A B L E
R E Q U I R E D
SOME
B E T W E E N
NORTH
T H R O U G H O U T
BEEN
B E
J U S T
T H E M C L O U G H L I N
S T R E E T .
WOULD
C O N N E C T S
C O U P L E T
WAY HAVE
L E V E L
V O L U M E S
M T .
O N E - W A Y
J U S T
Y A R D .
E3 - EASTS IDE EXPRESSWAY

MULTNOMAH STREET - MCLOUGHLIN EXPRESSWAY
S E C T
COST
ON
FROM
TO
LENGTH
(MILES)
N . E .
M T .
MULTNOMAH
HOOD
TOTAL
STREET
F R E E W A Y
M T .
HOOD
M C L O U G H L I N
F R E E W A Y
E X P R E S S W A Y
TRAFFIC
( 1975)
(ADT)
LANES
NO.
2.10
30 , 0 0 0
1 . 80
1 5 , 000
3 . 90
-1 00-
GRADING
&
PAviNG
($)
52 5 , 0 0 0
STRUCTURES
($)
735.000
450.000
950,000
97 5 . 0 0 0
1.685,000
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
1 , 260,000
3,360.000
4,620,000
1.400.000
1.530.000
2 , 930 , 000
2 . 660 . 000
4 , 890 . 000
7 , 550 , 0 0 0
N
VANCOUVER
EASTSIDE
-1 01 -
EXPRESSWAY
THE
CARE
I N D U S T R I A L
FOR RECONSTRUCTION
US3O.
THROUGH
CONNECTION
WAY.
THECOMMUNITY
TO T H E S T . J O H N S
A N DT U A L A T I N
IT
E V E N
R I V E R
PER
T H O U G H
S I D E ,
EXPRESSWAY
I S EXPECTED
W I L L
OF LLNNTON
BRIDGE.
VALLEY-ST.
B Y P A S S I N G
S T I L L
I S
OF THECOLUMBIA
JOHNS
THAT
BY
TO
HIGHWAY,
A N DMAKE
DIRECT
THE INDUSTRIAL
F R E E-
EXPRESSWAY.
1975
T H EL l N N T O N
B E U S E D
D E S I G N E D
RIVER
THIS
EXPRESSWAY.
C O M M U N I T Y
B Y SOME
1 5 , 0 0 0
O N
T H E
V E H I C L E S
D A Y .
E4 - INDUSTRIAL EXPRESSWAY (US30)

BURLINGTON - ST. JOHNS BRIDGE
S E CT 1 ON
COST
FROM
TO
TRAFFIC
(197 5)
(ADT)
LENGTH
(MILES)
BURLINGTON
TOTAL
ST.
JOHNS
BRIDGE
4 . 25
4 . 25
-1 02-
1 5 . 000
LANES
NO.
4
GRADING
ft
STRUCTURES
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
PAviNG
($)
($)
900 . 0 0 0
225 . 0 0 0
1,125.000
1,675.000
2 . 800 . 000
900 . 000
225.000
1 , 1 2 5 , 000
1 .675.000
2,800.000
INDUSTRIAL
-103-
EXPRESSWAY
T H E
TO
C O N N E C T
U P P E R
L E V E L
M C L O U G H L I N
BE
H O U S E
H A V E
N A L I Z E D
T O F O U R
C O N T R O L
W E S T
S T R U C T U R E
A N D
THE
LOWER
LEVEL
PER
W O U L D
D A Y .
GESTED
I N C R E M E N T S
EGRESS
A L S O
B E T W E E N
B R I D G E
N W E S T
A V E N U E .
S U C H
W I T H
T H E
F O R S O M E
1 0 , 0 0 0
O F OREGON
S T R U C T U R E
O F T R A F F I C
W O U L D
W H I C H
I N T E R - C I T Y
T H E I N D U S T R I A L
HAVE
VOLUME
V E H I R l V E R
P E R
W E S T
L L N N
9 , 0 0 0
F R O M
O F O R E G O N
N O D E S I R E
N E W
D A Y
W I T H
BUSINESS
V E H I C L E S
T H E
C I T Y
C O N -
T H O S E
F O R I N G R E S S
D I S T R I C T .
A N DE X C H A N G E
A R E A S
1 9 , 0 0 0
W I L L A M E T T E
V E H I C L E S
R E M O V E
B U S I N E S S
A N D A C O N S I D E R A B L E
W I T H S I G -
AND ITS CENTRAL
D I S T R I C T
C E N T R A L
M E D I A N A N D
T H E
F O R T H ER E M A I N I N G
B U S I N E S S
T H E
W O U L D
A N D T H A T
C O N N E C T I N G
CiTY
T H E
O F
P O I N T S .
B Y 1 9 7 5 S O M E
C I T Y
C A R E
R A I S E D
T OCROSS
S T R U C T U R E
S P L A N N E D
W I T H
B R I D G E
A T I T S T E R M I N A L
T H A T
L I N N
NT H E V I C I N I T Y
A N DO R E G O N
C A R E
T OSUCH
S E R V E
T R A F F I C
S U C H
C E N T R A L
L A N E S
D E S I R E
L I N N
T H E E X I S T I N G
C H A N N E L I Z E D
S E X P E C T E D
W I L L
D I S T R I C T
C I T Y
P R O V I D E D
P E RD A YW I L L
B E T W E E N
H I G H - L E V E L
H I G H W A Y
A TS E V E N T H
A D E Q U A T E
I T
C L E S
C I T Y
O FO R E G O N
W O U L D
OR
O R E G O N
T H E0 S W E G 0
| T WOULD
O F N E I G H B O R H O O D
O F H O M E - T O - W O R K
O FW E S T
L l N N
T R I P S
A N D O R E G O N
C| T Y .
E5 - OREGON CITY BRIDGE EXPRESSWAY (0RE43)

WEST LINN - OREGON CITY
E C T
O N
C O S T
FROM
TO
LENGTH
WEST
OREGON
L I N N
C I T Y
TRAFFIC
0.31
(ADT)
1 0 . 000
0.3 1
TOTAL
LANES
(1975)
(MILES)
GRADING
ft
STRUCTURES
($)
($)
- 1 04-
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
50,000
2 , 700 , 000
3 , 200,000
300 , 000
3 , 500
50.000
2 , 700 . 000
3,200,000
300,000
3 , 500,000
1
,., , ,
CONSTR.
PAviNG
NO.
.000
N
VANCOUVER
OREGON
CITY
BRIDGE
EXPRESSWAY
-1 05-
T H I S
C L A C K A M A S
OF
T E N T H
M E D I A N .
A T
M A J O R
I N
O R E G O N
I T
A L S O
C H A N G E
C A L L S
C A S C A D E
F R O M
T H I S
R O U T E .
S U C H
I T A L S O
T O T H E O R E G O N
AREAS
S T A T U S T O
C O N O F
S T R E E T S
N G L A D S T O N E .
O F A T R A F F I C
I N T E R -
AND THE B E G I N N I N G
S E W A G E
ALONG
THE RIVER
L A N E S
O F T R A F F I C
D I S P O S A L
SUCH
R E F U G E S
A N D 1 4 T H
I
C O N -
B O U L E -
T H E P A R T I A L
S T R E E T
T H E
T H E
O F L E F T - T U R N
R E Q U I R E S
C I T Y
S T R E E T
A S T E N T H
EXPRESSWAY
O F
T H E C O N S T R U C T I O N
F O R T H E C O N S T R U C T I O N
THIS
N O R T H
( M C L O U G H L I N
R E Q U I R E
A N D A T A R L I N G T O N
F R E E W A Y .
RECREATIONAL
E A S T
M A J O R
WOULD
C I T Y
J U - S T
T O T H E
A N DG E N E R A L L Y
A N D T H E D E V E L O P M E N T
BETWEEN
N E C T I O N S
C I T Y
S U C H
A L O N G
F R O M
H I G H W A Y
S T R E E T )
S T A T U S .
O F A C C E S S
R A I S E D
OFTHE
O F
C O N -
P L A N T A N D
THAT
LEFT
TURNS
E LI M l N A T E D .
T H E
U T I L I Z E D
S O M E
P A T E D .
F O U R
A L O N G
A R E A S
AREA.
USE
I N O R E G O N
A N D W A T E R
T R O L
R U N S
I N G L A D S T O N E
O F T H E P A C I F I C
E X P R E S S W A Y
ARE
B R I D G E
S T R E E T
V E R S I O N
V A R D
P R O J E C T
R I V E R
H A V E
U S 9 9 E
W O U L D
C U R B S
THAT
T H I S
B Y 1 9 75
SECTION
OF
B E M A I N T A I N E D ,
A L L OTHER
SOME
2 2 , 0 0 0
A N D I
TI S
V E H I C L E S
B E I N G
T W O U L D I
A N T I C I I N
P E R D A Y
T H E
WOULD
U S 9 9 E .
E6 - WATER STREET EXPRESSWAY (OREGON CITY, US99E)

GLADSTONE - OREGON CITY
S E C T I O N
C O S T
TO
FROM
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LENGTH
(MILES)
GLADSTONE
TOTAL
TENTH
STREET
1 . 20
22 . 0 0 0
1 . 20
LANES
NO.
4
GRADING
&
STRUCTURES
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
PAVING
($)
($)
200.000
200 . 0 0 0
200 , 000
- -
200 . 0 0 0
200 . 000
- -
200,000
1
- 1 06-
N
VANCOUVER
WATER
-107-
STREET
EXPRESSWAY
T H E
ROUTING
(CEDAR
AND
M U L T N O M A H
CONNECTING
E X P R E S S W A Y
A NOUTER
H I L L S - T U A L A T I N )
I N I T SC O U R S E
H I G H W A Y
M U L T N O M A H
F E E D E R
A R E A
R O U T E
WITH
M A J O R
A N
E A S T - W E S T
EXPRESSWAY
S E R V E
FREEWAY
B Y T H ES C H O L L S
S T R E E T S .
A N D WOULD
T O B A R B U R
T H EP O R T L A N D - S A L E M
I S I N T E R S E C T E D
A N DO T H E R
A S A
B O U L E V A R D
FERRY
B I S E C T S T H E
D I S T R I B U T I O N A N D
A N DP 0 R T L A N D - SA L E M
FREEWAY.
T H I S ,
BE
CONSTRUCTED
I T S
W E S T E R L Y
A S WOULD
TO FOUR
P O R T I O N S
B E A V E R T O N - AuRORA
10,000
VEHICLES
APPROXIMATELY
W A Y
TION
I T S L E N G T H .
ATED
I N GRADE
I M P O R T A N T
NOT
E7 - MULTNOMAH EXPRESSWAY
CEDAR HILLS-TUALATIN EXPRESSWAY - PORTLANDSALEM FREEWAY
H I L L S - T U A L A T I N
O L E S O N
H I G H W A Y
ROAD
TOTAL
P A R T
O F A
LENGTH
TO
E X P R E S S W A Y
S C H O L L S
O L E S O N
TO
A N D ,
WHEN
C R E E K
COUPLED
D E V E L O P
W I L L
S I G N A L I Z E D
O F
W I L L
P O S S I B L E .
LATE
A N
RATHER
T R A F F I C
MOST
B E SEPAROTHER
B EC H A N N E L I Z E D
U N T I L
I S
THROUGHOUT
P O R -
WITH T H E
A N D W I L L
C O N T I N U O U S
O N T H ES O U T H E R L Y
F O R A N I N T E R C H A N G E
B E
INCREASE
L E S S
B U T W I L L
I N T H E
2 0 - Y E A R
O FP L A N N I N G .
COST
TRAFFIC
H I G H W A Y
ROAD
LANES
(1975)
(MILES)
S C H O L L S
WITH
1 9 7 5 F O R SOME
E C T I O N
FROM
C E D A R
I N
WOULD
A N D NEIGHBORHOODS.
A L L MAJOR
N E C E S S A R I L Y
PERIOD
I S A
A R T E R I A L
O FS E R V I C E
COMMUNITIES
I N
O F T H E E X I S T I N G
F R E E W A Y .
A N DJ O H N S O N
E A S T - W E S T
WOULD
THAT
PER DAY AS THE EXPRESS-
R O U T I N G
O F P O R T L A N D
F R E E W A Y
L E V E L
BETWEEN
OF
E X P R E S S W A Y
CARE
VOLUME
VEHICLES
E X C E L L E N T
H I G H
WOULD
T H E P O R T L A N D - S A L E M
O F T H EC I T Y
S E L L W O O D
H I G H W A Y
PER D A Y , WHICH
T H I S
E A S T - W E S T
E X P R E S S W A Y S ,
A N D I T I S E X P E C T E D
1 8 , 0 0 0
I N T E R S E C T S
A L L O T H E R
L A N E S
F R E E W A Y
(ADT)
GRADING
&
STRUCTURES
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
(I)
PAviNG
NO.
(!)
($)
1 . 50
10 , 0 0 0
375 , 000
1 50 . 000
525,000
1 20.000
645.000
1.10
1 5,000
250.000
1 00 . 000
350.000
90.000
440.000
2 . 70
1 8 . 000
450,000
7 5 , 000
525.000
2 1 0 , 000
1,075,000
325 . 000
5 . 30
1 , 400.000
420.000
1.820.000
-1 08-
735.000
N
VANCOUVER
MULTNOMAH
EXPRESSWAY
TROUTDALE
WOOD VILLAGE
109-
T H I S
B R I D G E
A N D
E X P R E S S W A Y
A N DF O L L O W S
F E S S E N D E N
T H E N
S T R E E T S .
THE
N . E .
AND
FROM
S O U T H
T O
A T
P O R T L A N D
B O U L E V A R D ;
U T I L I Z E D
TRACKS
J U S T
S O U T H
A N D NORTH
O F
S T R E E T
THEN
O F
P A R K R O S E
O F C U L L Y
R O A D
A L O C A T I O N
J U S T
L I N E
T H E U N I O N
TO
N I N T H
R E C O N S T R U C T
T O A P O I N T
V I R G I N
C O L U M B I A
A N D
T O
T OF O L L O W
L O U I S
A R E A A N D
O F
T O T H EV I C I N I T Y
J O H N S
S T .
L O M B A R D
I S P L A N N E D
E A S T E R L Y
O FK I L L I N G S W O R T H
C O L U M B I A
S O U T H
N . E .
I T
H I G H W A Y
P O I N T
J U S T
N E A R
P O I N T
T H ES T .
T H E S T . J O H N S
L I N E
P O I N T
W I T H
A R O U N D
V I R G I N
A
S U C H
T H I S
C O N N E C T S
L O C A T I O N
S T R E E T S
T R A V E R S E S
B O U L E V A R D
J U S T
A G A I N
B E Y O N D
WOULD
P A C I F I C
B E
R A I L R O A D
C O N N E C T I O N
WITH
1 2 2 N D
A V E N U E .
T H I S
R O U T E
A L O N G
MAJOR
STREETS
THE
C A S C A D E
U N I O N
AND
N O R T H E A S T
P O R T L A N D
T H I S
W I L L
IN
GRADE
D E L A W A R E
B R I D G E
F R E E W A Y
C A S C A D E
FREEWAY
F R E E W A Y
TOTAL
A L O N G
T H E
N O R T H
I N D I R E C T
A I R P O R T
A N D
3 0 . 0 0 0
A V E N U E
W I L L
W I L L
O F
I T I S
P E RD A Y
S E C T I O N
E A S T
SOME
1 0 . 0 0 0
MADE
EXPRESSWAY
S E P A R A T I O N
P O S S I B L E .
L O C A T I O N S
B U TT H R O U G H O U T
V E H I C L E S
I N T E R S E C T I N G
THROUGH
T R A F F I C
WILL
O F T H E
A N D OTHER
I N SOME
WILL
F O U R
P O R T I O N
F R E E W A Y S
T H E FREEWAYS
BE
T O
T H E
VEHICLES
STREETS
C R O S S - T R A F F I C
A N D I N
F A C I L I T Y .
WITH
MAJOR
CONTROL.
T H E
SUCH
MADE
A T
MOST
SOME
B E UNDER
O F I T S L I N E A L
B E R E S T R I C T E D .
C O S T '
TO
D E L A W A R E
F R E E W A Y
CASCADE
122ND
TO
A N
O N
FROM
J O H N S
BE
B E
L E N G T H
I N
1 2 2 N D
S I G N A L I Z E D
PORTION
A F F O R D S
A N DC A S C A D E
W H I L E
TO
WILL
W I T H
W I L L
E N T I R E
U T I L I Z E
EXPRESSWAY.
M I N O R
I N D U S T R I A L ,
B O U L E V A R D
I N T E R N A T I O N A L
B Y 1 9 7 5 SOME
FREEWAY
L O C A T I O N S .
ST.
I T S
S E C T I O N .
E X P R E S S W A Y
THAT
D A Y
T H E
O F
A N D
S T O C K Y A R D S .
C A S C A D E
A L S O
O F T H E
C E R T A I N
S E R V I C E S
I T
EXPECTED
T H I S
C O N N E C T I N G
A N D I N T E R - T I E S
A N D C O L U M B I A
B E T W E E N
U S E
S E V E R A L
E S T A B L I S H M E N T S
T H R O U G H O U T
P E R
E C T
A L S O
P O R T L A N D .
TO
THE
R A I L R O A D
O F
( D E L A W A R E .
A N D M A N U F A C T U R I N G
P A C I F I C
L A N E S
I T
G I V E S
T E R M I N U S
F R E E W A Y S
F R E E W A Y S ) .
C O N N E C T I O N
THE
L O C A T I O N
A N D EXPRESSWAYS
W H O L E S A L E
E8 - COLUMBIA EXPRESSWAY (US3O-BYPASS)

ST. JOHNS BRIDGE - 122ND AVENUE
O V E R - A L L
T H E N O R T H E R N
FREEWAY
FREEWAY
AVENUE
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LENGTH
(MILES)
3 . 80
LANES
No.
GRADING
&
PAVING
($)
STRUCTURES
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
($)
2.230.000
2.100.000
4.330.000
1. 980.000
1 . 950.000
3 . 9 3 0 . 000
20.000
1 . 330 . 000
900 . 000
3 . 50
17 . 0 0 0
1 . 230 . 000
. 7 5 0 . 000
2 . 40
30 . 0 0 0
940.000
2 .00
1 0 . 000
800.000
11.70
4 . 300 . 000
-110-
1 . 650 . 000
940 . 0 0 0
1 . 350 . 0 0 0
2 . 290.000
800 . 0 0 0
1.280.000
2 . 080.000
5,950,000
6 , 680 . 000
12.630.000
N
VANCOUVER
COLUMBIA
111-
EXPRESSWAY
THE
DESIGNED
THE
SUNSET
SECTION,
CONGESTED
V I C I N I T Y
T H E A P P R O X I M A T E
A N D I T
CLES
PER
TO
R O U T E
U N T I L
WAY
DAY
WILL
USE
FREEWAY
A P P R O A C H E S
T H E SECTION
REACHES
SOME
AS
IN T H E C A N Y O N
THE
RESIDENTIAL
G R O W S .
L O C A T I O N
T H E S U N S E T
THE
ESPECIALLY
H I L L S
ROAD
IS S O L O C A T E D A N D
ROAD
IF O T H E R A L T E R N A T E R O U T E S A R E N O T
BECOME
C E D A R
FOLLOWS
EXPRESSWAY
A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF RELIEFFOR
FREEWAY,
WHICH WILL,
IMPROVED.
T H E
BARNES ROAD
AS TO AFFORD
T H I S
O F T H E E X I S T I N G
THAT
BY
THE
SECTION
W I T H
THESE
1975 SOME
IMMEDIATELY
VOLUMES
T H E C E N T R A L
BETWEEN
3 0 . 0 0 0
23RD
P E R
IN
BARNES
8 , 0 0 0
VEHI-
ADJACENT
I N C R E A S I N G
B U S I N E S S
AVENUE
V E H I C L E S
AREA
E X P R E S S W A Y
A S
D I S T R I C T
A N D S T A D I U M
FREE-
D A Y .
E9 - BARNES ROAD EXPRESSWAY

S E C T I O N
FROM
C O S T
TO
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LENGTH
(MILES)
S U N S E T
S K Y L I N E
F R E E W A Y
B O U L E V A R D
TOTAL
LANES
No.
GRADING
&
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($1
($)
($)
($)
($)
S K Y L I N E
B O U L E V A R D
2 . 50
8 . 000
750.000
S T A D I U M
F R E E W A Y
2 . 00
1 2.000
940.000
4 . 50
STRUCTURES
PAVING
670 . 000
1 . 4 2 0 , 000
7 50.000
940 . 000
1 , 600,000
2.540.000
670 . 000
2 . 360 . 000
2,350,000
4,710.000
1 . 6 9 0 . 000
2 . 170 . 0 0 0
r
i
!
-112-
N
VANCOUVER
BARNES
-113-
ROAD
EXPRESSWAY
THE
TION
ING
JOHNSON
OF THE S O U T H E R L Y
COMPOSED
FREEWAY,
OF
AND
MAKES
DIRECT
AND
THE
WITH
122ND
SOME
1 5 , 0 0 0
O F 122ND
AVENUE
P E R
AND
W I L L
I N
BECOME
I N D U S T R I A L
D I S T R I C T S
OF
I S
I N T E G R A L
THE PORTLAND
L I N E
C R E E K A N D
COMPANY
L I N E
T O
I N
CONNECTION
OF
BY
1975
THE SECTION
FREEWA.YS
E A S T E R L Y
ALONG
I T MAKES
EXPECTED
AN
H I G H -
FREEWAY
FREEWAY.
I N
T H E
T H I S
O F J O H N S O N
WHERE
ROUT-
SELLWOOD
THE S E L L W O O D
T R A C T I O N
P E R DAY
A N D CASCADE
D A Y
BANK
EXPRESSWAY
CONTINUA-
THE
A N DI S L O C A T E D
HOOD
EXPRESSWAY.
WITH
AVENUE
AND M T .
V E H I C L E S
ROUTE
FREEWAY
I S
CIRCUMFERENTIAL
EXPRESSWAY.
CREEK
CONNECTION
T H ENORTH
T H I S
C L E S
JOHNSON
T H EP O R T L A N D
V I C I N I T Y
EXPRESSWAY
THE MULTNOMAH
THE
WAY
CREEK
CROSS-TOWN
A N D SOME
S E C T I O N
PART
T H E
8 , 0 0 0
T H E R E O F .
OF
T H E
EAST
METROPOLITAN
TO
SERVE
BETWEEN
T H E
V E H I T H I S
A N D
S O U T H E A S T
AREA.
E10 - JOHNSON CREEK EXPRESSWAY

LAURELHURST FREEWAY - MT. HOOD FREEWAY
COST
S E C T I O N
FROM
TO
LENGTH
(MILES)
C A S C A D E
FREEWAY
F R E E W A Y
TOTAL
C A S C A D E
M T .
HOOD
F R E E W A Y
F R E E W A Y
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LANES
NO.
GRADING
&
PAVING
($)
STRUCTURES
($)
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
2 . 30
1 5,000
57 5 . 0 0 0
190 . 000
76 5 , 0 0 0
1 . 27 5 . 0 0 0
2 . 40
8 . 000
600 . 000
2 1 0 , 000
8 1 0 , 000
1.290.000
2 . 1 0 0 . 000
1,17 5 , 0 0 0
400 , 000
1 , 575 , 0 0 0
2 , 56 5 , 000
4 . 1 4 0 . 000
4 . 70
1 14-
2,040.000
N
VANCOUVER
JOHNSON CREEK
-115 -
EXPRESSWAY
T H I S
FOR
PATED
E V E N
D E V E L O P
T H I S
SUNSET
THIS
OF
ORENCO
IT
H A S A S I T SO B J E C T I V E
H I G H W A Y ,
AND
WILL
TEND
FELT
THE
ROAD:
FREEWAY,
BE A V A I L A B L E
I T I S
O F THIS
B E I N G
NORTH
SUNSET
THUS,
AND
THE
OF
IN 1 9 7 5 W O U L D
BARNES
AMOUNT
THE
THE
IMPROVED
FOR USE BY THIS
REPORT,
I T . T o
H l L L S B O R O A N D
FREEWAY
THE
R E L I E F
A N T I C I -
I M P R O V E D ,
T O C O N G E S T
B E T W E E N
ADVISABLE.
GENERALLY
INTERSECTS
IS E X P E C T E D
OF STUDY
L O C A T I O N
WAS
IS
CORNELL
THE SUNSET
WOULD
W H I C H
FREEWAY
TO
W H I C H
I TI SC U R R E N T L Y
A NA L T E R N A T E
EXPRESSWAY
PROXIMITY
ROAD,
T H O U G H
C A P A C I T I E S
E N D
OF
WAY
V A L L E Y
BY THE END O F THE PERIOD
W I L L .
THE
E X P R E S S W A Y
T H ET U A L A T I N
ROAD
LOCATION
COMMUNITY
IN
EXPRESS-
TRAFFIC.
TO 8,000
CLOSE
CORNELL
WHICH
VEHICLES
PER DAY.
E11 - HlLLSBORO EXPRESSWAY

WHEELER AVENUE - SUNSET FREEWAY
S E C T I O N
FROM
C O S T
TO
LENGTH
(MILES)
W H E E L E R
A V E N U E
TOTAL
S U N S E T
F R E E W A Y
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
1 . 25
8 . 000
1.25
LANES
No.
4
GRADING
ft
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
($)
225,000
155,000
380,000
350 . 0 0 0
730 . 000
225 , 0 0 0
155,000
380 . 000
350 , 0 0 0
730,000
STRUCTURES
PAVING
($)
- 1 1 6-
N
VANCOUVER
HILLSBORO
EXPRESSWAY
TROUTVILLAGE
-117-
THE
P A R T
O F
BYPASS
WAY,
AREA
I T S
T I O N ,
AND SPOKANE.
I T
V I C I N I T Y
WEST
MAKES
OF
COMMUNITY
FREEWAY
ROAD
WITH
FREEWAY
AFFORD
I S
OF
THE
PER
AND
THE
PER
OF
THAT
AND
AND
THESE
BETWEEN
6.000
SUNSET
TO T H E
P O R T I O N
OF T H E
R A I L R O A D
UPPER
BOONES
OF
FERRY
ROUTING,
THE
EXPRESSWAY,
1 9 75
BE
WOULD
CIRCUMFERENAREA.
T R A F F I C
USING
THIS
VOLUMES
AND
PER
VOLUMES
F A C I L I T Y
WILL
TLGARD
VEHICLES
WHEN
LAURELHURST
METROPOLITAN
BY
LOCAI N T H E
BEAVERTON
SOUTHERLY
WOULD
MOST
P A C I F I C
RAILWAY
HIGHWAY
PORTLAND
DAY
OREGON
T H E P 0 R T L A N D - SA LEM
THE
AND
DAY
FOR THE
WITH
J O H N S - S U N S E T
WESTERLY
BEAVERTON
FREEWAY
TO
EXTENSION
EXPECTED
VEHICLES
LAND-SALEM
BEAVERTON
S T .
VEHICLES
SOUTH
8 . 0 0 0
THE
H I G H -
FREEWAY
CENTRAL
T H I S
SOUTHERLY
AROUND
I T
TO
COMPLETE
ROUTING
P A R A L L E L
CONNECTION
FREE-
R I V E R
T H E SOUTHERN
BYPASSES
T H E
THROUGHOUT
T H E SUNSET
T H E
INTERCHANGE.
THE
AND
A
1 5 , 0 0 0
JUST
T I G A R D
THROUGH
I T
THROUGH
C E R T A I N
AND SEATTLE
TO
M I L L .
AND MAKES
T R A F F I C
COUPLED
TIAL
CEDAR
O F
PORTLAND
AFFORDS
DESTINED
O F
O F
C O L U M B I A
FOLLOWS,
R O U T I N G
CONNECTION
A N D TRAVERSES
LOCATION
T R I P S
HIGHWAY
T H E
T I M E
FORMS
R O U T I N G
THE P O R T L A N D - S A L E M
A N D LOWER
VALLEY
T H I S
D I S T A N C E ,
COMPANY
T H E SAME
BETWEEN
FREEWAY
A R E A S .
EXPRESSWAY
A N D A T
FOR WILLAMETTE
COASTAL
OF
THE SUNSET
WAY
OF
CEDAR
W E S T E R L Y
D I M I N I S H
THE
DAY
PORT-
BETWEEN
FREEWAY.
E12 - CEDAR HILLS-TUALATIN EXPRESSWAY

SUNSET FREEWAY - PORTLAND-SALEM FREEWAY
COST
S E C T I O N
FROM
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LENGTH
TO
(MILES)
SUNSET
FREEWAY
M U L T N O M A H
S C H O L L S
E X P R E S S W A Y
H I G H W A Y
T I G A R D
TOTAL
2 . 35
BEAVERTON
M U L T N O M A H
BEAVERTON
S C H O L L S
E X P R E S S W A Y
H I G H W A Y
T I G A R D
FREEWAY
6 . 000
LANES
NO.
GRADING
&
PAVING
($)
STRUCTURES
($)
500 . 0 0 0
1 . 57
15.000
3 10. 000
1 . 66
1 0 . 000
350.000
1 . 42
9 . 000
340 . 0 0 0
2.10
8 . 000
490 , 0 0 0
1 , 990 . 000
905 , 0 0 0
9.10
-118-
225,000
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
(!)
7 25.000
950 , 000
3 10. 000
1 60 . 0 0 0
470.000
470 . 0 0 0
90 , 0 0 0
560 , 0 0 0
1 70 . 0 0 0
510. 000
220 . 0 0 0
7 30,000
390 , 0 0 0
880 , 000
500 , 0 0 0
1 . 380.000
1 20 , 0 0 0
2,895.000
1 . 920.000
1 . 675 . 000
4,815,000
N
VANCOUVER
CEDAR .HILLS - T U A L A T I N
EXPRESSWAY
TROUTDALE
WOOD VILLAGE
-119-
T H E
A P P R O X I M A T E
L Y I N G
J U S T
L E N G T H .
O A T F I E L D
L O C A T I O N
T OT H ES O U T H
P A C I F I C
B E T W E E N
H I G H W A Y
C O N V E R T
T H E P R E S E N T
M A J O R
U S A G E
THEREOF
SN O T F E L T
S T R E E T
B E T W E E N
O R E G O N
N E C T I O N
C I T Y
T W O U L D
N O R T H
T O C A R E
L O C A T I O N
O F
M C L O U G H L I N
1 0 , 0 0 0
T H R O U G H
F R E E W A Y
W I T H
T H I S
D I R E C T C O N -
A N DT O
S U C H
O A K
B O U L E V A R D
B U T
C O U P L E D
T OM A K E
FREEWAY
G R O V E .
F O R S O M E
B O U L E A N D
O FT H E C A S C A D E
B EP O S S I B L E
I T S
T H E
B EP R A C T I C A L T O
S T A N D A R D S ,
A N D G L A D S T O N E
O FO A K
( M C L O U G H L I N
T W O U L D
R O A D
O F
F O R
O FG L A D S T O N E
P O R T I O N
T OT H EL A U R E L H U R S T
B O U L E V A R D
E X P E C T E D
T H A T
MOST
A SA R E L I E F
U S 9 9 E ,
T OE X P R E S S W A Y
O FT H E S O U T H E R N
T OS E R V E
E A S T .
I SA L O N G T H E
O A T F I E L D
THROUGHOUT
T H EC O M M U N I T I E S
G R O V E .
F R O M
TI
E X P R E S S W A Y
F T H EE X I S T I N G
I T I S D E S I G N E D
P R E S E N T
V A R D )
R O A D
O
M C L O U G H L I N
E X P R E S S W A Y
V E H I C L E S
P E R D A Y
S
B Y
1975.
E l 3 - OATFIELD ROAD EXPRESSWAY

FROM
C O S T
TO
TRAFFIC
LENGTH
(MILES)
M C L O U G H L I N
TOTAL
B O U L E V A R D
C A S C A D E
FREEWAY
LANES
(1975)
(ADT)
1 0 , 000
3.10
3.10
GRADING
&
STRUCTURES
No.
($)
($)
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
975 . 000
165 , 0 0 0
1 . 1 4 0 . 000
760.000
1 . 900.000
97 5 , 0 0 0
165.
1 . 1 4 0 . 000
760.000
1 . 900
-120-
CONSTR.
PAviNG
000
. 000
AT
i
VANCOUVER
OATFIELD
- 121 -
ROAD EXPRESSWAY
T H I S
TION
OF
OF
ITS
LENGTH
B R I D G E
AND
TERMINUS
AS
ITS
OUTER
EXPRESSWAY
GERMANTOWN
WITH
I T
C O N N E C T S
FUNCTION
OF
M A K I N G
COLUMBIA
T H I S
THESE
ROUTING
PER
DAY
AT
TO
AND
ROUTE
V I A
THE
ROAD
COMPLETES
THE
AN
PORTLAND
LINK
ST.
JOHNS
NORTHERN
CORNELL
IN
CEDAR
SIDE
S T .
I T S
AND
CONNECTION
THIS
IS
BY
TO
HAS
A
JOHNS
GROWTH
TIME
T O FOUR
INTERCHANGES
A T
ITS
A T I T SCROSSING
EXPECTED
1 9 7 5 .
INCREASE.
AND
DIRECT
EXPRESSWAY
VOLUMES
CIPATED
THE
WEST
THE
AT
LOCA-
PORTION
DUAL
NORTHERLY
BRIDGE
AND
EXPRESSWAY.
V E H I C L E S
SUBURBAN
THE
WITH
EXPRESSWAY
SIDE
W I T H
COMPLETING
GREATER
FREEWAY
THE
WEST
APPROXIMATE
THE
FREEWAY
SUNSET
TERMINUS.
CIRCUMFERENTIAL
A R E A .
5 , 0 0 0
THE
THE
D I R E C T L Y
I N D U S T R I A L
SOUTHERN
EXPRESSWAY
FOLLOWS
THROUGHOUT
CONNECTING
THE
AND
ROAD
IN
I T
THAT
THEY
L A N E S
TERMINAL
YET
T H I S
I S
TO
AN
AREA
NOT.
WILL.
P O I N T S .
FOR
SOME
COULD
CAUSE
HOWEVER.
A N T I -
T H E HIGHWAY
T H R O U G H O U T
O F T H EC O R N E L L
CARE
UNPRECEDENTED
W I T H
S K Y L I N E
IS
T R A F F I C
BOULEVARD
ROAD.,
El4 - ST. JOHNS-SUNSET EXPRESSWAY

SUNSET FREEWAY - INDUSTRIAL FREEWAY
S E C T 1
COST
ON
TO
FROM
LENGTH
(MILES)
S T .
J O H N S
S U N S E T
B R I D G E
FREEWAY
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
5 , 000
10. 50
10 . 50
TOTAL
. 122-
LANES
NO.
4
GRADING
&
PAVING
($)
STRUCTURES
($)
CoNSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
200.000
3.240.000
360 . 0 0 0
3 . 600 . 000
3 . 240 , 0 0 0
360 . 0 0 0
3.600.000
200.000
3 . 800.000
3 , 800.000
N
VANCOUVER
ST. JOHNS SUNSET

EXPRESSWAY
TROUTWOOD VILLAGE
-123-
MAJOR
STREETS
-1 25-
T H A T
B O U L E V A R D
R A T H E R
THE
H I G H
L A N D - S A L E M
V O L U M E S
SUCH
I N
F R E E W A Y
A L T H O U G H
1 0 , 0 0 0
B E R T H A
T H E F I R S T
VOLUMES
WOULD
S H O U L D
O F T H E
S E C T I O N
T R A F F I C
B O U L E V A R D
B E R T H A
O N E
O F
I N
W A S H I N G T O N
O F T H E P O R T .
V O L U M E S
I N 1 9 7 5
P E RD A Y I N
S E C T I O N ,
WOULD
A S H I G H
I S
B E A C C O M P L I S H E D
V E H I C L E S
F E WY E A R S
RANGE
B E T W E E N
F R E E W A Y
T O O N L Y
H I G H W A Y -
P R O J E C T
- S A LE M
I T
D R I V E
F R E E W A Y .
A M O U N T
C A P I T O L
A S
A W A I T I N G
L I N E - H A R B O R
W O U L D
O F T H I S
P R I O R I T Y
I N T E R I M
C O U N T Y
P O R T I O N
A N D T H EP O R T L A N D
B E
T H E
T R A F F I C
C O N S I D E R A B L E .
A S 3 0 . 0 0 0
DAY.
THE
B R I N G I N G
CONTROL
IN
OF
WORK
W O R D S .
W I T H
T R A F F I C
ANTICIPATED
K E Y I N T E R S E C T I O N S
A N D D E V E L O P I N G
O T H E R
S Y S T E M
TYPE
C E R T A I N
E S T A B L I S H I N G
O R D E R L Y
C O N T R O L
M O V E M E N T S
WOULD
U N D E R
L E F T - T U R N
W I T H
TO
M O V E M E N T S ;
P R O G R E S S I V E
O F L E F T - T U R N I N G
C O U P L E D
AMOUNT
S I G N A L I Z E D
C O N T R O L
S I G N A L
A N D C R O S S -
O F
S H O U L D E R
PARK I N G .
T H E
W E S T
F R E E W A Y
T H R O U G H
T A I N
W A S H I N G T O N
C O U N T Y
L I N E
W A S H I N G T O N
'
T I G A R D
C O U N T Y
L I N E
3.65
1 . 20
4.85
T O T A L
T H A T
I N
B E S E R V I C I N G
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LENGTH
TO
B O U L E V A R D
A T S T R A T E G I C
S I G N A L I Z E D
W I L L
1 9 7 5 T H I S
M E D I A N
S E C T I O N
S O M E
C O N T R O L
A C C E S S
A N DI N S T A L L I N G C E R P O I N T S
I N T H I S S E C -
T O P U TC E R T A I N
C O N T R O L .
I T I S
O F T H EP A C I F I C
2 0 . 0 0 0
H I G H W A Y
V E H I C L E S
H I G H W A Y
P E R
I N T E R -
W E S T
D A Y .
COST
(MILES)
B E R T H A
U N D E R
T O P A R T I A L L Y
R A I S E D
P A C I F I C
A N D T H E
FROM
S . W .
I S L A N D S
T M A Y A L S O
T I G A R D
S N E C E S S A R Y
C O N S T R U C T I N G
S E C T I O N S
B E T W E E N
L E F T - T U R N
T I O N ,
Ml - BARBUR BOULEVARD
BERTHA BOULEVARD - TlGARD
C O N V E R S I O N
( U S 9 9 W )
-126-
LANES
NO.
GRADING
&
PAVING
($)
STRUCTURES
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
(*)
(I)
- -
1 30 . 0 0 0
1 30 . 0 0 0
200 . 0 0 0
200.000
200 . 0 0 0
330 . 0 0 0
330 . 0 0 0
330 . 000
8 . 000
130 . 0 0 0
20 . 0 0 0
T H I S
T H A T
U N I O N
I T S
A N D
P R O J E C T
A V E N U E
P R A C T I C A L
(
C A P A C I T Y .
H A W T H O R N E
B R I D G E
OPEN
TO T R A F F I C ,
ERLY
P O R T I O N
A N DO N C E
I T W I L L
I N
B E Y O N D
T H EM O R R I S O N
T O MAKE
P R O J E C T
A P P R O A C H E S
T R A F F I C
M E R I T
T R A F F I C
B R I D G E
A R E R E C O N S T R U C T E D A N D
O V E R - A L L
T H E B R I D G E
T O S E R V I C E
C A R R Y I N G
A P P R O A C H E S
O F T H I S
I M M E D I A T E L Y .
S I G N E D
I S O N EO F C O N S I D E R A B L E
I S P R E S E N T L Y
O N U N I O N
T H E SOUTH-
O N E - W A Y
H A V E
C O U P L E T
B E E N
A N DG R A N D
S O
D E -
A V E N U E S
A S
T O
O N E - W A Y .
AT
P U T
T H E S E
L A T E R
T H E O U T S E T
S T R E E T S
DATE
I T
N O R T H E R L Y
S E R V I C E
T R A F F I C
CARE
T I M E
W H I C H
W I L L
STREET.
IN
WILL
THE
FREMONT
BE
WILL
F R E M O N T
N . E .
E A S T
S T R E E T
F R E E W A Y
BROADWAY
B U R N S I D E
TOTAL
S T R E E T
A D E Q U A T E L Y
N O R T H -
R E L I E V E
| T
I S
SOME
T R A F F I C
INSTALLED
ON
INSTALLED
A N D FLOW
AND ACQUIRE
NORTHERLY
SIGNALS
OF
RIGHT
PORTIONS
AVENUE
WIDEN
OF
WHERE
ONE-WAY
OF
COULD
SOME
AN
THOSE
ORDERLY
ACCOMMODATED.
PORTIONS
OF
GRAND
WAY F O R N E W C O N S T R U C T I O N
GRAND
AVENUE
OF
PER DAY
WITH
THAT
BE
COUP-
SOUTH
N E C E S S I T Y ,
P A I R I N G
SO
M A J O R
CONSTRUCTED
P E R DAY
WOULD.
O F
F R E E W A Y S
VEHICLES
AVENUE
TRAFFIC
TO
THIS
20,000
GRAND
ON U N I O N
NECESSARY
THAT
I S
H A V E
P E R I O D
O N T H I S
SYSTEM
VEHICLES
A N D SOME
W I L L
O F C E R T A I N
T H E L O A D
EXPECTED
3 0 , 0 0 0
A R T E R I A L
I S
NOT
I N
PRES-
IMPROVED.
C O S T
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LENGTH
TO
(MILES)
L O M B A R D
A T A
T H E O N E - W A Y
I M P O R T A N T
FROM
N . E .
T H A T
THE FREEWAY
FREEWAY
BE
T H I S
F O RA
THOUGH
SERVICE
PROGRESSION
AVENUE
T H A T
T R A F F I C
F I N A L
THEREOF.
TO
ENTLY
R E A L I Z E D
OPERATION.
PRESENTLY
THE
F E L T
S O A S T O
T O U S E T H I S
U L T I M A T E L Y
LET
I T
I S
TO C O N T I N U E
B R O A D W A Y
D E S I R I N G
I S
EVEN
AND
NORTH
- UN ION-GRAND AVENUE ONE-WAY COUPLET

LOMBARD STREET - D I V I S I O N STREET
O N L Y
| T
B E Y O N D
F O RH E A V Y
A W A I T I N G
HAVE
WOULD
O N E - W A Y .
A R T E R I A L .
I T
TO
M2
W I L L
C O U P L E T
S O U T H
| T
U N D E R
F R E M O N T
F R E E W A Y
17 , 0 0 0
2 .08
LANES
NO.
GRADING
&
STRUCTURES
PAVING
($)
($)
350.000
'
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
(*)
($)
- -
350.000
300.000
6 50.000
400 . 0 0 0
535.000
0.82
30 . 0 0 0
135.000
135. 000
E A S T
B U R N S I D E
S T R E E T
0 . 83
30 . 0 0 0
85,000
85.000
S . E .
D I V I S I O N
S T R E E T
1.14
30 . 0 0 0
50 . 000
N . E .
BROADWAY
620,000
4 .87
8 5,000
500 . 000
550,000
95 000
645.000
500 . 000
1 . 1 2 0 , 000
79 5 . 0 0 0
1 . 9 1 5 . 000
-1 2 7 -
THIS
PROJECT
BEAVERTON-HILLSDALE
BARBUR
M A J O R
BOULEVARD
S T R E E T
CONSTRUCTED
L A N E S .
T R A F F I C
DAY
AS WELL
S T A N D A R D S .
VOLUMES
F O RT H E IMPROVEMENT
BETWEEN
BEAVERTON
A S S.W. B E R T H A
P R O J E C T S
L A T E
I NT H E P E R I O D
DEMANDS
A M O U N T I N G
U N T I L
O F STUDY
T OSOME
H I G H W A Y - BERTHA
T H E GLENCULLEN
M A Y DOUBLE
A N D W I L L
OF
AND
HIGHWAY
O F T H I S
1 0 , 0 0 0
REQUIRE
AND P R O H I B I T I O N
THE
B E I N G
I SB U I L T ,
P A R T I A L
ALONG
R E P O R T ,
T U A L A T I N
V A L L E Y
S E L L W O O D
F R E E W A Y
P E R
T A N T
A R E
T R I P S
T H E F A C I L I T Y .
C O N N E C T I O N
T H E S U N S E T
A N DE A S T E R L Y .
H I G H W A Y
A N D A S A
H I G H W A Y ,
I N T H EO V E R - A L L
METROPOLITAN
THESE
O FT H I S
I NS E R V I C I N G
SECTION
O FPARKING
I M P O R T A N C E
O V E R E M P H A S I Z E D
T O FOUR
V E H I C L E S
BOULEVARD
FREEWAY
ACCESS
THE
S.W.
BOULEVARD TO
A R E P R E S E N T L Y
O N T H E B E AV E R T O N - H I L L S D A L E
I NT H E SCHOLLS
EXPECTED.
CALLS
HIGHWAY
T H U S ,
ACCOMMODATION
C A N N O T B E
T R A F F I C A N D
B E T W E E N
F R E E W A Y ,
I
T H E
A N D
T B E C O M E S
O FT R A F F I C
T H E
I M P O R -
I N
T H E
AREA.
CONTROL O F
M3 - BEAVERTON-HILLSDALE HIGHWAY (ORE10)

AND BERTHA BOULEVARD
BEAVERTON - BARBUR BOULEVARD
SLAVIN RD . -BARBUR BLVD. INTERSECTION

S E C T I O N
C O S T
FROM
TRAFFIC
LENGTH
TO
(1975)
{MlLES)
B E A V E R T O N
W A S H I N G T O N
B E R T H A
W A S H I N G T O N
C O U N T Y
B O U L E V A R D
L I N E
'
S E C T I O N
B A R B U R
C O U N T Y
B O U L E V A R D
L I N E
(ADT)
NO.
GRADING
&
STRUCTURES
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
350.000
250 , 000
600.000
PAVING
($)
($)
2.94
1 0 . 000
350.000
3 . 36
1 0 . 000
410.000
190.000
600 . 000
7 5 . 000
67 5 , 0 0 0
0.91
1 0 . 000
1 6 0 . 000
1 20 . 000
280.000
40.000
320 . 000
9 20 . 0 0 0
3 1 0 . 000
7.21
TOTAL
LANES
'
-128-
1 , 230 . 000
36 5 , 0 0 0
1.595,000
IT
LANE
OF
I SD E S I R E D
STANDARDS
A PRESENTLY
O S W E G O
DEFICIENT
H I G H W A Y
C A R R I E S
WORK
TRIPS AND WILL
TANT
LINK
PORTLAND
W O O D
1975
DAY.
TAKE
AREA
F R E E W A Y
WHEN
A VERY
SOME
PLACE
CAPACITY
O FSTREETS
T H E OSWEGO
CARE
PORTION
LOAD
T H E
INCREASINGLY
IMPOR-
A N D HIGHWAYS
I N
I N T H I S
THAT B Y
VEHICLES P E R
P R O J E C T
THROUGH
A N D
T H E
A N D T H E SELL-
2 5 , 0 0 0
E X P E N D I T U R E
3 6 F T . T O4 4 F T . )
O F
O F H O M E - T O -
I T I S E X P E C T E D
F O R SOME
A HEAVY
THIS
EXPRESSWAY
O F T H EI M P R O V E M E N T
(FROM
T O FOUR-
BECOME AN EVER
WILL
W I T H O U T
THIS
HEAVY
A R EC O M P L E T E D .
STREET
STREET
T H E CARRYING
ARTERIAL.
IN T H E NETWORK
THIS
W I D E N I N G
T O IMPROVE
S OA S T O INCREASE
C O U L D
N O M I N A L
P R O H I B I T I O N O F
P ARK I N G .
M4 - MACADAM STREET
HAMILTON STREET - SELLWOOD BRIDGE
S E C T
1 ON
FROM
C O S T
TO
LENGTH
S.W.
H A M I L T O N
T O T A L
S T R E E T
S E L L W O O D
B R I D G E
TRAFFIC
LANES
( 1975)
(MILES)
1.85
(ADT)
2 5,000
NO .
4
GRADING
&
STRUCTURES
PAVING
($)
($)
3 50 , 0 0 0
'
3 5 0 . 0 0 0
1.85
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
350,000
350 . 000
350,000
350,000
"1
1
- 1 29-
CONSTR.
T H I S
ERLY
P R O J E C T
APPROACH
T H E
E X T E N S I O N
O F
M A D I S O N
S T R E E T S
TO
F O R T R A F F I C
C A R E
2 5 , 0 0 0
LET
C O N S I D E R S
TO T H E H A W T H O R N E
O N E - W A Y
T H R O U G H O U T
V E H I C L E S
C O U P L E T
M O S T
D E S I R I N G
EAST
OF GRAND
E X P E C T E D
T H A T
T H EH A W T H O R N E
3 0 , 0 0 0
BE
V E H I C L E S
U N T I L
IT
F I C
S I G N A L
THE
P R O J E C T
WOULD
BY
O N H A W T H O R N E
S I D E
B R I D G E .
P E RD A Y , T H E T R A F F I C
| T
S E R V E
O N T H I S
BRIDGE
I S
A R E A
C O U P -
WHILE
WOULD
A N D
S O M E
T O U S E T H I S
1 9 7 5 .
B R I D G E
FREEWAY
EAST-
VIADUCT AND
O F T H E E A S T
D E S I R E
AVENUE
T H EM T . HOOD
CONSIDERABLY
ON A
T O U S E T H I S
P E RD A Y W O U L D
JUST
W I L L .
T H ER E C O N S T R U C T E D
BRIDGE
I S
SOME
B R I D G E
CONSTRUCTED.
H I G H E R .
W I L L
B E NECESSARY
CONTROL
O N T H E
S O THAT
TO A D DA D D I T I O N A L
O N E - W A Y
A N ORDERLY
C O U P L E T
P R O G R E S S I O N
TRAF-
P O R T I O N
O F
O F
T R A F F I C
RESULT.
M6 - HAWTHORNE BRIDGE APPROACH AND HAWTHORNEMADISON STREET ONE-WAY COUPLET

WILLAMETTE RIVER - 50TH AVENUE
S E C T i O N
C O S T
TO
FROM
LENGTH
(MILES)
W I L L A M E T T E
R I V E R
S . E .
G R A N D
A V E N U E
S . E .
2 0 T H
S . E .
3 9 T H
T O T A L
LANES
NO.
GRADING
&
PAVING
STRUCTURES
($)
($)
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
1 , 800 . 000
1 . 000,000
2 . 800 , 000
0 . 38
25,000
A V E N U E
0.79
25.000
140 , 0 0 0
1 40 . 0 0 0
3 9 T H
A V E N U E
1.15
15,000
215 .000
2 15,000
125,000
5 0 T H
A V E N U E
0 . 48
1 5 . 000
105.000
105,000
50,000
155,000
2 , 260.000
1,17 5 . 0 0 0
3,435,000
S . E .
G R A N D
S . E .
2 0 T H
A V E N U E
S . E .
A V E N U E
S . E .
'
TRAFFIC
( 1975)
(ADT)
A V E N U E
2 . 80
460 . 0 0 0
' 1,800.000
1,800,000
1 40 , 0 0 0
340 , 000
-131 -
T H I S
D I V I S I O N
S E R V E
P R O J E C T
S T R E E T
W O U L D
T H E F A S T
Y O N D
T H E C O R P O R A T E
T I M E
WAY
STREET
5 O T H
S U C H
P R E S E N T L Y
H I G H W A Y
IT
W I T H I N
2 0 , 0 0 0
V E H I C L E S
T H I S
FOR
OF
U N T I L
E A S T
M A J O R
I N I 9 6 0
F L A N K I N G
BETWEEN
T R A F F I C
W O U L D
T H A T
T H I S
S T R E E T S ,
WOULD
A N D 1 9 6 5 THAN
T H E
O
F AO N E -
W I T H O U T
S T A G -
F O R
T H E
A N DM T . H O O D
F A C I L I T I E S .
T H EP O R T I O N S
S T R E E T .
B E T T E R
A R E A B E -
R E L I E F
ROAD
WOULD
O F T H ECORPORATE
2 1 S TA V E N U E A N D
A F F O R D
P R O P E R
FREEWAYS
)T O
A N D ( 2 )A T
T OM O V E
V A L L E Y
S U C H
T H E W I D E N I N G
O F T H I S
A C C O M M O D A T E
P E R D A Y B Y 1 9 75 A N D T H A T
V O L U M E .
T H EO T H E R
V O L U M E S
P O R T L A N D
S T R E E T
A L E S S E R
T H R O U G H
P O W E L L
A SO T H E R
R T H E E S T A B L I S H M E N T
I SE X P E C T E D
S T R E E T
OF
A S WELL
O FP O R T L A N D ,
I N T E R N A L
O V E R C R O W D E D
L E N G T H .
N S C O P E :
I N T H EA R E A
F O R
S E N T I R E
S I D E
E I T H E R
P R O P E R
COUPLET
A V E N U E ,
N A T I O N .
L I M I T S
T
I
E A S T
T O A R R A N G E ,
S T R E E T
F O R T H E I M P R O V E M E N T
I
B E T W O F O L D
G R O W I N G
S A M E
D I V I S I O N
C A L L S
T H R O U G H O U T
L I M I T S
WOULD
CARE
W I T H
MANY
I NCOMMON
HAVE
T H E Y
H I G H E R
W O U L D
A N DE X P R E S S W A Y S
SOME
T H E S E C T I O N S
T R A F F I C
I N 1 9 7 5
O R
A R E CONSTRUCTED.
M7 - DIVISION STREET
21ST AVENUE - POWELL VALLEY ROAD
S E C T I ON
C O S T
FROM
TO
TRAFFIC
LENGTH
(1975)
(MILES)
E A S T S I D E
E X P R E S S W A Y
S . E .
6 0 T H
C A S C A D E
1 2 2 N D
S . E .
F R E E W A Y
A V E N U E
F R E E W A Y
A V E N U E
1 6 2 N D
G R E S H A M
A V E N U E
R O A D
TOTAL
'
S . E .
6 0 T H
C A S C A D E
1 2 2 N D
S . E .
F R E E W A Y
A V E N U E
1 6 2 N D
G R E S H A M
P O W E L L
F R E E W A Y
A V E N U E
A V E N U E
R O A D
V A L L E Y
R O A D
(ADT)
LANES
GRADING
&
STRUCTURES
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
($)
PAVING
No.
($)
1.12
20.000
200 , 000
0 . 98
20.000
17 5 , 0 0 0
1.12
20 , 0 0 0
1 90 , 0 0 0
2 . 00
1 5.000
3 50 , 0 0 0
2 . 00
1 0 . 000
330.000
330 . 000
330.000
3 . 20
8 . 000
530.000
530.000
530 . 0 0 0
1.30
5 . 000
2 1 0 . 000
2 10,000
2 10,000
1 , 9 8 5 , 000
1.985,000
11.72
-132-
200 . 000
200 , 0 0 0
17 5 , 0 0 0
17 5 , 0 0 0
1 90,000
3 50 , 0 0 0
1.98
5,000
1 90 , 0 0 0
3 50 . 0 0 0
T H I S
OF
L E F T - T U R N
R E F U G E S
R I G H T - T U R N I N G
S E C T I O N S
D O N E
R I G H T
W I D E N I N G
W I T H I N
O F
W A Y
A V E N U E
O F
WILL
A N DEVEN
THIS
VERY
VEHICLES
THE
O F
I S
I N S T A L L A T I O N
O F
A D D I T I O N A L
C E R T A I N
K E Y
8 2 N D
A V E N U E .
O F
P L A C E ,
A S
I N T E R N O
A L L WORK
T H E P R E S E N T
N E C E S S A R Y
F O RU S A G E
C O M P L E T E D ,
E A S T
STILL
SERVE
SOME
C U R B
WOULD
L I N E
H A N D L E
F R E E W A Y .
S T R E E T
22,000
STREET
O R
P E RD A Y BY 1 9 7 5 .
E V E N
E V E R -
P E N D I N G
W I T H
P O R T I O N
T H E
O F
A N D M T . H O O D
TO 2 5 , 0 0 0
A N DSOUTHERLY
WOULD
A N
A R T E R I A L
T H E C E N T R A L
T H ENORTHERLY
A D T ON T H I S
T O
O FT H I S
B U R N S I D E
IMPORTANT
1 9 5 5 - 1 9 6 0
ABLY
T A K E
T H E C A S C A D E
B E T W E E N
DAY
A T
T H E L E N G T H
W O U L D
WORK
F R E E W A Y
WAY
C E T E R A ,
T H E L I M I T S
D E M A N D
C O M P L E T I O N
F O R T H E
L I N E .
S U C H
I N C R E A S I N G
C A S C A D E
E T
T H R O U G H O U T
A D D I T I O N A L
BE
L A N E S .
C A L L S
A N D T H E P R O V I S I O N
CARE
VEHICLES PER
PORTIONS OF
F O RSOME
1 5 . 0 0 0
I T I S TO BE UNDERSTOOD
ARTERIAL
WOULD
8 2 N D
F R E E -
THAT
BE C O N S I D E R -
HIGHER.
M8 - 82ND AVENUE
SANDY BOULEVARD - DUKE STREET
COST
S E C T I O N
FROM
TO
LENGTH
(MILES)
S A N D Y
B O U L E V A R D
($)
STRUCTURES
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
($)
1 5 , 000
50,000
S T R E E T
0.75
20.000
30 . 0 0 0
30 . 0 0 0
30.000
1.72
22,000
6 5 . 000
65.000
6 5.000
1.45
20 , 0 0 0
50 , 0 0 0
50,000
50 . 0 0 0
B U R N S I D E
S T R E E T
S . E .
P O W E L L
S . E .
D U K E
TOTAL
PAviNG
1 . 27
B U R N S I D E
B O U L E V A R D
GRADING
F R E E W A Y
F R E E W A Y
P O W E L L
LANES
NO.
B A N F I E L D
B A N F I E L D
S . E .
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
B O U L E V A R D
S T R E E T
5.19
195,000
'
- -
50 , 0 0 0
50 . 0 0 0
19 5 , 0 0 0
19 5 . 0 0 0
- 133-
T H I S
D E M A N D
B E T W E E N
W E S T
A R E A
T H I S
V I S I O N E D ,
S Y L V A N
MAJOR
I N G
W O U L D
O F A D D I T I O N A L
I T
D A Y ;
D O U B L E
S E C T I O N
H O W E V E R .
P E R I O D
U N T I L
A R T E R I A L S
S E X P E C T E D
W I L L
I
T R A F F I C
I N T E R C O N N E C T I O N
T O P R O H I B I T
B Y 1 9 7 5 T H E
N T H E F I R S T
1 5 , 0 0 0
1 0 - Y E A R
T H E S E
C O N T R O L
S I G N A L I Z -
O F T H E S E C T I O N .
F O R S O M E
O F S T U D Y
E N -
B E A V E R T O N -
A N DT H E
A N DT H E
T H A T
C A R E
I N
A S
I M P R O V E M E N T - - T H E
B EN E C E S S A R Y
M O S T
R E S U L T
I N T H E
T H R O U G H O U T
H I G H W A Y
T H E WORK
T O M I N O R
A L S O
T H E
WOULD
K E Y I N T E R S E C T I O N S
| T W I L L
P A R K I N G
2 0 - Y E A R
W H I C H
A L L S I G N A L S .
S Y L V A N
A M O U N T
A N I M P R O V E M E N T O N
IMPROVEMENT.
O FC E R T A I N
A TC E R T A I N
S H O U L D E R
S E C T I O N
O R E 6 .
I
T H E S T A T E
B U TY E T T OB EP R O G R A M E D
S E C T I O N ,
F E A T U R E S
G R O W I N G
H A S P R O G R A M E D
STREET
I N C R E A S I N G
H I G H W A Y .
A N DE S P E C I A L L Y
A R T E R I A L .
C U R R E N T L Y
R E E D V I L L E - B E A V E R T O N
FOUR-LANE
O F
A N DS Y L V A N ,
T H E E V E R
V A L L E Y
D U ET OT H E R A P I D L Y
F L A N K I N G
D E P A R T M E N T
R E C O G N I Z E S
O N T H ET U A L A T I N
R E E D V I L L E
S L O P E
A R E A S
THE
P R O J E C T
F O RU S A G E
B E A V E R T O N -
P E R I O D
V O L U M E S
W I L L
T H EB E A V E R T O N - H I L L S D A L E
H I G H W A Y .
H I L L S B O R O
A N DO T H E R
E X P R E S S W A Y
O F
T H E
A L M O S T
M U L T N O M A H
R E L I E F
A R E C O N S T R U C T E D .
M9 - TUALATIN VALLEY HIGHWAY

REEDVILLE - MULTNOMAH COUNTY LINE
S E C T I O N
C O S T
LENGTH
TO
FROM
R E E D V I L L E
B E A V E R T O N
B E A V E R T O N
M U L T N O M A H
TOTAL
COUNTY
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(MILES)
L I N E
(ADT)
LANES
GRADING
&
STRUCTURES
4.76
8 . 000
3.35
1 5,000
($)
($)
660 . 000
19 5 . 0 0 0
TOTAL
($)
($)
1 9 5 . 000
8 55.000
I
1
- 134-
R/W
($)
660 . 000
8 55,000
8.10
CONSTR.
PAvING
No.
6 10. 000
6 10. 000
1 , 270 . 0 0 0
19 5 . 0 0 0
1.465,000
T H I S
R I G H T S
I T
S T R E E T
TWEEN
WITH
H I G H W A Y
O F WAY O N 1 2 2 N D
W I L L
F A C I L I T Y
SE X P E C T E D
CARE
T H E SOUTHERLY
AND
T H E M T . HOOD
PER
D A Y I N 1 9 7 5 .
T H A T
F O R SOME
U T I L I Z E S
T H E
E X I S T I N G
A V E N U E .
F R E E W A Y
SECTION
FREEWAY
B Y 1 9 7 5
2 0 . 0 0 0
T H I S
V E H I C L E S
A N D E A S T
BETWEEN
S E R V I N G
F O U R - L A N E
P E R D A Y
B U R N S I D E
S . E . D I V I S I O N
SOME
8 , 0 0 0
B E -
S T R E E T ,
STREET
V E H I C L E S
M10 - 122ND AVENUE

SANDY BOULEVARD - JOHNSON CREEK EXPRESSWAY
C O S T
S E C T I O N
FROM
LENGTH
TO
(1975)
(MILES)
C O L U M B I A
B A N F I E L D
E X P R E S S W A Y
TRAFFIC
F R E E W A Y
0 . 80
(ADT)
1 5,000
LANES
NO.
4
GRADING
ft
STRUCTURES
PAVING
tfl
1 2 0 . 0 0 0
B A N F I E L D
F R E E W A Y
B U R N S I D E
B U R N S I D E
S T R E E T
S . E .
S . E .
D I V I S I O N
S T R E E T
M T .
S T R E E T
D I V I S I O N
HOOD
S T R E E T
F R E E W A Y
1 . 80
20 . 000
2 7 0 . 0 0 0
1 .70
15,000
2 5 0 . 0 0 0
(l
'240.000
|j
1 . 60
8 . 000
880 . 000
5 . 90
TOTAL
C&M1STR.
1
1
I
1!
'
TOTAL
If)
1 2 0 . 0 0 0
R/W
tfl
<*)
2 7 0 , 0 0 0
I
7 5 , 0 0 0
1 95.000
6 0 0 . 0 0 0
870 . 000
ii
2 5 0 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 . 0 0 0
II
f
8 8 0 . 0 0 0
Ii
4 5 0 . 0 0 0
6 50.000
490 . 000
2 5 0 . 0 0 0
1 . 3 2 5 . 0 0 0 -
2 . 2 0 5 . 0 0 0
1!
||
1
1
II
I
!
- 1 35-
1
f
1
:
i
T H I S
L A N E S
O F T R A F F I C
ACCOMPLISHED
OF
T H E WORK
TION
I N
THROUGH
WOULD
SIGNALS
CARE
C A L L S
F O R T H E C R E A T I O N
T H R O U G H O U T .
S O M E
WIDENING
I T WOULD
F O RT H E SOME
T H E P O R T I O N
O F T H ES T R E E T
THROUGH
BE NECESSARY
A N D DO A N O M I N A L
2 0 . 0 0 0
O F
O F T H E WORK
B EA C C O M P L I S H E D
O FPARKING.
FIC
TO
P R O J E C T
AMOUNT
W O U L D
STREETS.
B E
ENTLY
AND OTHER
PLANS
A S W O U L D
B E E X P E C T E D
B Y
W E S T
PER
O F T H E
IT
1 2 2 N D
DAY
C A S C A D E
E.
L A N D
A T
F R E E W A Y
B U R N S I D E
ALONG
E L E C T R I C
B E C O M E
S E R V I C E
U T I L I Z E
C A S C A D E
O F P O R T L A N D
I N C R E A S I N G L Y
O F T H I S
L I N E
T O
O F
E X T E N D E D
O N
T H E
E N D . B U T
O U T S K I R T S
T O G R O W .
T O U P - G R A D E
O F
I
T H E L E V E L
A V E N U E
W I L L
B EP R E D O M I N A T E L Y
THE
BETWEEN
F A C I L I T Y
PERIOD
A T I O N A L
A S
T O
E X P R E S S W A Y
S T A N D A R D S
E A S T
T O B U I L D
O F 8 2 N D
T H I S
A V E N U E
A N D G R E S H A M
R E Q U I R E
PRES-
O FW A Y
T O
BETWEEN
82ND
AVENUE A N D
P E R D A Y B Y 1 9 7 5
B E T W E E N
1 2 2 N D
P E R D A YW I L L
W I L L
A V E N U E A N D
W H I L E
D E M A N D
I NT H E P O R T I O N
S E R -
R O A D
9 . 0 0 0
T H E U S E O FT H I S
O NWEEKENDS
T H E S E
T H ED E M A N D S O N
B EC O N S I D E R A B L E
TRAVEL
T R I P S
A N D I N T E R C H A N G E O F
H O W E V E R .
W I L L
O FR E C R E A T I O N A L
V E H I C L E S
F A C I L I T Y .
N E I G H B O R H O O D S :
BETWEEN
D U R I N G
T OT H E M T . HOOD
RECRE-
A R E A .
T H E
H E R E
W I L L
U N T I L
O F
SUCH
F R E E W A Y
B E P O S S I B L E
THAT
V E H I C L E S
F A C I L I T Y ;
W I L L
T H I S
R O U T E .
W O U L D
RIGHTS
OF CONSTRUCTION.
V E H I C L E S
R O U T E .
1 2 . 0 0 0
T H I S
B A N F I E L D
I T
2 0 . 0 0 0
U S E T H I S
A V E N U E .
FROM
T R I P S
G R E S H A M .
M A D E
A T T H E E A S T
C O N T I N U E S
N E C E S S A R Y
S O M E
T O
1 6 2 N D
T H E
OF THE PORT-
A R E B E I N G
I N T H E E A S T E R L Y
O F
L O C A T I O N
S T R E E T
ROUTING
R A I L R O A D
P O R T I O N
A R E A
E A S T
S E C O N D A R Y
L I M I T S
B U R N S I D E
C O M P A N Y
STANDARDS
CROSS
COUNTY
1 9 7 5 .
O F AN ABANDONED
T I M E ,
S T R E E T
A N D E .
P O W E R
T H EP R E S E N T
C O R P O R A T E
OREGON CITY
W O U L D
S T R E E T
THE LOCATION
F E D E R A L - A I D
T H E
B U R N S I D E
A TM A J O R
MULTNOMAH
S U F F I C I E N T
I S EXPECTED
A V E N U E
D E S I R E
V I C E
T H E
THAT
TRAF-
1 6 2 N D
F R E E W A Y
S E P A R A T I O N S
T OA C Q U I R E
EXPRESSWAY
O F CHANNELIZATION
VEHICLES
O FGRADE
I T I SUNDERSTOOD
ACCOMPLISH
THE P R O H I B I -
TO INSTALL
TO 4 0 , 0 0 0
O F T H E I M P R O V E M E N T
F O U R
E R A B L Y
P R O J E C T
LY
T H R O U G H
A G A I N ,
T I M E
N
B EB O R N E
I NM I N D
T H A T
F R E E W A Y .
T H E M T .
HOOD
D O T H E R
F R E E W A Y ,
I N EXCESS
DURING
I TS H O U L D
A ST H E F R E M O N T
R E L I E F
T H I S
O F THOSE
T H EF I R S T
R O U T E S
S T R E E T
PREDICTED
10-YEAR
E D E V E L O P E D
M A Y C A R R Y
PERIOD
F O R
V O L U M E S
F O R1 9 7 5 .
C O N S I D -
ESPECIAL-
O F THE STUDY.
M11 - EAST BURNSIDE STREET

UNION AVENUE -GRESHAM ROAD
S ECT I O N
C O S T
FROM
TO
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LENGTH
(MILES)
U N I O N
2 0 T H
A V E N U E
S T A R K
16
'
F R E E W A Y
S T R E E T
C A S C A D E
1 2 2 N
20
A V E N U E
2ND
F R E E W A Y
A V E N U E
A V E N U E
TOTAL
T H
S T A R K
F R E E W A Y
S T R E E T
C A S C A D E
F R E E W A Y
1 2
2 N D
A V E N U E
1 6
2 N D
A V E N U E
F A I R V I E W
40,000
0.79
A V E N U E
A V E N U E
LANES
GRADING
&
STRUCTURES
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
($)
10 . 000
PAviNG
No.
4
($)
10 . 000
'
1 0.000
1.15
30.000
20 . 000
20 . 0 0 0
1 . 38
25,000
20 . 000
20 . 0 0 0
20 . 000
0.7 1
25 . 000
45.000
45.000
45 . 000
2 . 00
20 . 000
500 . 0 0 0
500 . 0 0 0
2 . 00
12.000
400 . 000
400 , 000
200 . 0 0 0
600 . 000
3 . 20
9 . 000
6 50.000
6 50, 000
250.000
900.000
1.645.000
11.23
1,645.000
-136-
20 . 000
200.000
6 50 . 0 0 0
700 . 000
'
2.295.000
T H I S
OF
WEIDLER
AND
103RD
1 2 2 N D
OF
OF
HALSEY
AVENUE
AND
THE
WELL
TO
THROUGH
AVENUE
FOR
SERVICE
AS
SHOPPING
102ND
CARE
SO
1O3RD
STREET
AS
T H I S
TO
THE
VERY
THE
AN
DEMANDS
ACCOMMODATE
VERY
UPON
R E S I D E N V I C I N I T Y
EARLY
OF
AND
AND
MOVEMENT
THE
ALL
SHOPPER
FREEWAY
AVENUE
GROWING
IN
AND
AVENUE
BANFIELD
ORDERLY
RAPIDLY
AT
112TH
112TH
IMPROVEMENTS
D I C T A T E D
S T R E E T
AND
BETWEEN
FOR
ESTABLISHMENT
H A L S E Y
AVENUE
CARE
E X C E S S I V E
STREETS
FOR
BETWEEN
AS
AREA.
ARE
CALLS
U T I L I Z I N G
BETWEEN
AVENUE
T R A F F I C
T I A L
C O U P L E T .
STREET,
WIDENING
AND
IMPROVEMENT
O N E - W A Y
DATE
THE
TO
LOCAL
HOME-TO-WORK
TR|PS.
BY
IT
I S EXPECTED
10,000
VEHICLES
P E RDAY I N
COMPLETION
O F OTHER
FLANKING
SOME
ING
WILL
BE EXCEEDED
THAT
SECTION
REACH
OF 15,000
IT
HALSEY
SUCH
WOULD
A T ARATA
WERE
THIS
HIGHWAY
SHORT
OF 102ND
TO EXTEND
PEND-
PER
THIS
G L I S A N
B U TESTIMATES
VOLUME
ESPECIALLY
WILL
VEHICLES
A N D CONNECT
N O T A V A I L A B L E
BE USED
THIS
SECTIONS.
AVENUE.
TO 2 0 . 0 0 0
ROAD.
WILL
1 9 7 5 : HOWEVER,
F A C I L I T I E S
BE D E S I R A B L E
TO TROUTDALE
STREET
WORK
ANDCERTAIN
TO T H EWEST
VOLUMES
EASTERLY
THAT
NO
DOUBT
DAY.
PROJECT
STREET
TO
OF COST FOR
F O R I N C L U S I O N
I N
T H I S
REPORT.
Ml2 - HALSEY STREET

BANFIELD FREEWAY - 122ND AVENUE
S E C T I O N
C O S T
LENGTH
TO
FROM
(MILES)
B A N F I E L D
F R E E W A Y
N.E.
1 2 2 N D
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LANES
No.
1 6 , 000
1 . 35
A V E N U E
1 . 35
TOTAL
GRADING
ft
STRUCTURES
PAviNG
($)
($)
4 15,000
'
TOTAL
($)
(*)
($)
415.
- 137-
R/W
4 15, 000
4 15.000
CONSTR.
000
r
9 0 0 . 000
1.315,000
900,000
1.315,000
T H I S
C E R T A I N
T I O N
O F
CREASE'
WAY.
P R O J E C T
S T R A T E G I C
T H E P A C I F I C
T H E C A R R Y I N G
H I G H W A Y
S I G N A L S .
WOULD
O FA NOMINAL
C H A N N E L I Z I N G
T H E N E E D
ALONG
E A S T ,
C A P A C I T Y
T H E I M P R O V E M E N T
INSTALLATION
R E C O G N I Z E S
U S 9 9 E .
O F T H I S
CERTAIN
C R I T I C A L
INTERCONNECTING
SIGNALS
CAL
INTERCONNECTION
O F T H ES I G N A L S
VOLUME
G R E S S I O N
DENSITY
CLES
OF
EITHER
SIGNAL
1 9 7 5T R A F F I C
A R EE S T I M A T E D
VOLUMES
3 0 . 0 0 0
T H E
TRAFFIC
I N T E R S E C T I O N S ,
THROUGH
ACTUAL
PHYSI-
ORT H E I N S T A L L A T I O N
CONTROL
VOLUMES
SO THAT P R O -
EXPRESSWAY
I N THIS
T O3 5 . 0 0 0
O N THIS
T O B EAPPROXIMATELY
P E RD A Y B U T I N T H EP E R I O D
PARALLELING
F I C
T R A F F I C
K E Y HIGH-
THROUGH
M A Y B E A C C O M P L I S H E D .
THE
HIGHWAY
I M P O R T A N T
LOCAT O I N -
O FA D D I T I O N A L
AND
OF
I M P R O V E
SO A S
BE A C C O M P L I S H E D
NUMBER
TO
T H E P R E S E N T
SECTION
VEHICLES
PRECEDING
A N DFREEWAY
SECTION
2 0 , 0 0 0
CONSTRUCTION
F A C I L I T I E S ,
C A NB E EXPECTED
P E R
O F
V E H I -
TRAF-
T O REACH
D A Y .
M13 - MCLOUGHLIN BOULEVARD

MILWAUKIE - GLADSTONE
S E C T
O N
FROM
C O S T
TO
LENGTH
(MILES)
MILWAUKIE
TOTAL
F R E E W A Y
G L A D S T O N E
F R E E W A Y
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LANES
No.
20 . 000
3.05
20 . 000
- 1 38-
&
PAVING
2.15
5 . 20
GRADING
($)
80.000
'
STRUCTURES
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
<$)
($)
($)
- -
80 , 0 0 0
1 20 .000
1 20 . 0 0 0
200 . 000
200.000
80.000
1 20 . 000
-
200 . 0 0 0
THE
Ross
WALK
T H I S
P R O J E C T
I S L A N D
B R I D G E
ON T H E S O U T H E R L Y
F T .
O F
B R I D G E
R O A D W A Y
TO
SOME
TO
B R I D G E
C O N N E C T I O N ,
B R I D G E
M A Y
V E H I C L E S
EVEN
THE
THE
THE
OTHER
OF
T H E
P E R
I N
ON
IMPROVEMENTS
P R I O R
F R E E W A Y
I S L A N D
4 5 . 0 0 0
ROAD,
I S
WHICH
VEHICLES
PER
MEDIAN.
RAISED
BOULEVARD
ROAD
CALL FOR
KEY INTERSECTIONS AND
DAY
AND
WHICHEVER
I S
A C C O M P L I S H E D .
I T
I S
U S I N G
EXPECTED
I T ,
CALL
CHANNELIZATION
THE
THE
WILL
FOR
OF
THE
MORE
F E A S I B L E
IMPROVEMENTS
HAVE
SOME
ON
25.000
INSTALLATION
CERTAIN
C R I T I C A L
OF
I N -
S I G N A L I Z A T I O N .
82ND AVENUE
COST
TO
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LENGTH
(MILES)
TOTAL
A N T I -
FOSTER ROAD
FROM
F R E E W A Y
1 9 7 5
T H E
ON POWELL
S E C T I O N
P O R T L A N D- S A L E M
T H I S
R O S S
O F
42
O F
D A Y .
T H E
E X C E S S
O F
S I D E -
TO D E V E L O P
H O O D - S U N S E T
V O L U M E S
F I G U R E
T R A F F I C .
PROJECT
TERSECTIONS
M T .
T H E
OR T H E P R O H I B I T I O N O F P A R K I N G SO A S TO D E V E L O P
LANES
FOSTER
POWELL BOULEVARD -
D A Y .
V E H I C L E S
SI G N A L I Z A T I O N O F C E R T A I N
FOUR
T R A F F I C
R E A C H
O F
C A P A C I T Y
MCLOUGHLIN BOULEVARD AND FOSTER
WIDENING
PORTLAND-SALEM FREEWAY
T H E
T H E
P E R
4 5 . 0 0 0
O F
R E C O N S T R U C T I O N
REMOVAL
AND WIDENING
V E H I C L E S
SOME
T H E
T H E
P E R D A Y .
BETWEEN
Ml4
4 0 , 0 0 0
I S
F O R
I N C R E A S I N G
T R A F F I C
T H E
SIDE
T H U S
C I P A T E D
AS
C A L L S
THROUGH
C A S C A D E
F R E E W A Y
4.80
30.000
LANES
NO.
4
GRADING
&
PAVING
STRUCTURES
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
<$)
($)
($)
100.000
1 00.000
4 . 80
400.000
500.000
400.000
500.000
500 . 0 0 0
500.000
i
. 139-
T H I S
OF
SOUTH
ARTERIAL
VARD.
MENT
CONTROL
THAT
SUCH
I S POSSIBLE
COUPLET
SOUTHERLY
TANT
LINK
DEVELOPED
OF
I S
SOME
BOULE-
COUPLET
STUDY
PROGRAM
COULD
OF
SIGNALS
PRESCOTT
OF THIS
I N T H E IMPLEMIGHT
BETTER
3OTH
I N T H EFINAL
TO IMPROVE
DICTATE
B E CONS-
AVENUE.
I F
A N A L Y S I S .
I T
T H E15TH-16TH
AVENUE
OR KI L L I NGSWORTH
COUPLET
SHOPPING
I S
CENTER
STREET.
VERY
IMPOR-
AS WOULD BE
CORPORATION.
EXPECTED
2 5 , 0 0 0
T H E IMPROVE-
THE E X T E N S I O N
FUTURE
20-YEAR
SIDE
I S
O FTRAFFIC
BY T H E L L O Y D
THE FREMONT
SOUTH
BEYOND
PORTION
TO THE E A S T
IT
SERVICE
THAT
B E D E T E R M I N E D
N O T BENECESSARY
ONE-WAY
NORTH-
TO M C L O U G H L I N
O F T R A F F I C
FREEWAY
O NA LOCATION
EXTENSION
COMPLETE
SURFACE.
MOVEMENT
O FTHE OVER-ALL
SHOULD
MIGHT
ON T H I S
WEARING
TRUCTED
STREET
A S AN
AND THE INSTALLATION
A NORDERLY
IT
MENTATION
THE
REQUIRED
SERVES
AND GIVES
LOMBARD
OF THE P R E S E N T
STREETS
COUPLET
EXPRESSWAY
FROM
T H E WORK
CERTAIN
TO
ONE-WAY
THE EASTSIDE
THAT
VEHICLES
FREEWAY
THIS
COUPLET
P E R DAY I N
A N D 3 5 , 0 0 0
BY
1975
T H E AREA
V E H I C L E S
WILL
NORTH
P E R
DAY
THEREOF.
Ml5 - 15TH-16TH AVENUE ONE-WAY COUPLET

LOMBARD STREET - MULTNOMAH STREET
E C T
O N
FROM
C O S T
TO
LENGTH
TRAFFIC
(MILES)
N . E .
LOMBARD
F R E M O N T
S T R E E T
F R E E W A Y
TOTAL
F R E M O N T
i
E A S T S I D E
F R E E W A Y
E X P R E S S W A Y
LANES
(1975)
(ADT)
GRADING
&
NO.
($)
(!)
2 . 02
20.000
720 . 0 0 0
1 .08
35.000
390.000
3.10
STRUCTURES
PAVING
1 . 1 1 0 . 000
'
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
<$)
($)
($)
720 . 000
500.000
390.000
1 . 1 1 0 . 000
1.220.000
390.000
500.000
1 . 6 1 0 . 000
- 140-
THE
TION
OSWEGO
FROM
I T S
WITH
PRESENT
RAISED
LENGTH,
THREE
MEDIAN.
OF MAJOi.
CLES
P E R D A Y WOULD
THE
IS
FOR
THE
OF
T H I S
LAURELHURST
CENTRAL
RECONSTRUC-
WILLAMETTE
RIVER
OSWEGO
VOLUMES
ON
THE
THIS
WAY
SUCH
TO
USE
BE
LANES
BY
T H I S
CASCADE
T H I S
I N
CONSIDERABLY
I S
HIGHER
SOME
15,000
VEHI-
BE
GROWTH
SOMEWHAT
CONSTRUCTION
SOUTH
WOULD
I T S
OF
THE
TO
OSWEGO
THE
MCLOUGHLIN
THE
T H E
ARE PRIMARILY
I N
THE
ACROSS
RELIEVE
EXPRESSWAY.
OF
TRAF-
T R A F F I C
HOME-TO-WORK
CHARACTER.
FREEWAY-WEST
AT
SOME
OF
7 . 0 0 0
HOWEVER
THIS
L I N N
PORTION
THE PRESENT
I N C I D E N T A L
C R I T I C A L
VEHICLES
SUCH
TRAFFIC
OF
HIGH-
L O C A T I O N S .
U N T I L
CONSTRUCTED
ON
OF
SIGNALIZA-
T H E NORMAL
CONNECTING
A N D OTHER
H I G H W A Y ;
FREEWAY
AND
WOULD
THE WIDENING
1 9 7 5 THAT
TRAFFIC
ROADS.
1975
THE
POINT
ROUTE
C H A N N E L I Z A T I O N
EXPECTED
TO
OF
MOST
AND T H E NEW BRIDGE
T H I S
TRIPS
AND
THE
EXPRESSWAY,
WOULD
FOUR
AS
JUST
LAURELHURST
PROJECT
BY
BUT
T H E OSWEGO
U T I L I Z I N G
RECREATIONAL
LANES
HIGHWAY.
HIGHWAY
D I S T R I C T
BOULEVARD-OATFIELD
DEMANDS
THAT
VOLUME
AT
FOUR
THROUGHOUT
STREETS
U S E SUCH
FREEWAY
BUSINESS
TO
CHANNELIZATION
EXPECTED
E X I S T I N G
EXCESS
F I C
LANES
INTERSECTING
IT
AND
CALLS
NO P A R K I N G
AND THE ADEQUATE
TION
OF
HIGHWAY
BETWEEN SELLWOOD FREEWAY AND LAURELHURST FREEWAY
I T
P E R DAY
T I M E
VOLUMES
I S
WILL
AS T H E
WILL
BE
LOCATION.
M16 - OSWEGO HIGHWAY (0RE43)

SELLWOOD BRIDGE - WEST LINN
S E C T I ON
C O S T
FROM
TO
LENGTH
(MILES)
SELLWOOD
TOTAL
F R E E W A Y
B R I D G E
W E S T
3 . 90
L l N N
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
FREEWAY
4.00
7 . 90
LANES
No.
7 . 000
15,000
GRADING
ft
STRUCTURES
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
PAVING
($)
($)
660.000
'
660.000
150.000
8 10.000
1.000.000
500,000
1.500.000
750 . 0 0 0
2 . 250.000
1 .660 .000
500.000
2.160.000
900.000
3 . 060.000
J
I
1
-141 -
IT
THE
PROVED
TO
T H I S
F R E E W A Y .
I T
M T .
PROVED
SARY
L A N E S .
W I T H
A M O U N T
A R T E R I A L .
I S
T O
I N
HOOD
T H I S
T H E M T .
T H I S
TO CARRY
I S THE D I R E C T
122ND
THAT
BY
E A S T
O F
EARLY
8 2 N D
DATE.
P O R T I O N
SOME
15,000
O F T H E M T . HOOD
B Y
A N D T H E
C A S C A D E
T R A F F I C
V O L U M E S
P E R D A Y O N
P O R T I O N
A V E N U E
I S
IT MIGHT
O F
T H I S
T H I S
O F
N O T I M -
BE N E C E S -
F O U R - L A N E
AND GRESHAM
VEHICLFS
LINK
FREEWAY
A S TO
E A S T E R L Y .
JUNCTION
CONNECTING
BE I M -
SO
S E R V I C E D
T H E E A S T E R L Y
LlNNEMAN
1975
V E H I C L E S
THAT
SHOULD
A V E N U E
A R E A
FREEWAY
2 0 . 0 0 0
E A S T E R L Y
BETWEEN
TO
HOOD
E X P E C T E D
SOME
FREEWAY
T H E R E S I D E N T I A L
F R E E W A Y
T H E
H I G H W A Y ,
L E A S T
T H E E V E N T
EXTEND
PROVEMENT
POINT
A T
AT A REASONABLY
TO
PECTED
THAT
O F T H E M T . HOOD
C O N N E C T
S T R E E T
W I L L
AND
F E L T
FOUR
A D E Q U A T E L Y
T H E
I S
IMPROVEMENT
I M -
IS EX-
P E R D A Y BY 1 9 7 5
BETWEEN
AND THE C l T Y
THE TERMINAL
OF GRESHAM.
OREGON CITY
Ml 7 - POWELL VALLEY ROAD

82ND AVENUE - GRESHAM
S E C T
COST
1 ON
FROM
TO
TRAFFIC
LENGTH
(MILES)
C A S C A D E
1 2 2 N D
FREEWAY
A V E N U E
L I N N E M A N
TOTAL
J U N C T I O N
1 2 2 N D
A V E N U E
L I N N E M A N
GRESHAM
LANES
(1975)
(ADT)
20.000
2 .00
($)
15.000
- 142-
($)
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
<*)
($)
($)
360 . 0 0 0
1 40 . 0 0 0
500 . 000
IMPROVEMENT
330 . 0 0 0
690 . 000
4.10
STRUCTURES
360 . 0 0 0
4
No
2.10
&
PAviNG
NO.
J U N C T I O N
GRADING
- -
330,000
150.000
480 . 000
690.000
290.000
980 . 000
T H I S
I T S
T R A F F I C
THE
R A P I D
T A K I N G
W I L L
AND
H I G H W A Y
V O L U M E S
GROWTH
P L A C E
BECOME
I N
AN
M E N T S
B E I N G
CALLY
A T
O F
M A D E
FOUR
A T
VERY
T H E P A S T
A R E A ,
I S
W I T H
S T R A T E G I C
H I L L S
S E R V I N G
A N D
I S
T H I S
K E Y
I N T E R S E C T I O N S .
WITH
THE M U L T N O M A H
I N
W I T H
T H A T
T H A T
C A L L S
C E R T A I N
THE CEDAR H I L L S - T U A L A T I N
I N C R E A S E
E X P E C T E D
T H E I M P R O V E M E N T
L A N E S
HIGHWAY.
R A P I D
F E W Y E A R S
I T
A R T E R I A L
T R I P S .
T H E R A L E I G H
TON-HILLSDALE
WITH
O F
T H I S
I M P O R T A N T
H A S H A D A
D U R I N G
F O RT H E
I M P R O V E S P E C I F I -
T H E
BEAVER.
EXPRESSWAY
AND
EXPRESSWAY.
OREGON CITY
Ml 8 - SCHOLLS FERRY HIGHWAY

RALEIGH HILLS - PROGRESS
COST
S E C T I O N
FROM
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LANES
NO.
1 .70
10 . 0 0 0
250,000
1 .80
8 .000
270.000
LENGTH
TO
(MILES)
BEAVERTON -H I L L S D A L E
MULTNOMAH
H I G H W A Y
M U L T N O M A H
EXPRESSWAY
C E D A R
E X P R E S S W A Y
E X P R E S S W A Y
PAVING
ft
STRUCTURES
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
($)
($)
50.000
-
520.000
3 . 50
TOTAL
GRADING
50.000
r
-
143-
300 . 0 0 0
._.,..,,...
t 40.000
440 . 0 0 0
270.000
150.000
420 . 0 0 0
570 . 0 0 0
390 . 0 0 0
860.000
IT
OF
CORNELL
T H I S
I S PLANNED
ROAD
F O U R - L A N E
THE
E A S T E R L Y
STREET
W I L L
DUSTRIAL
TO IMPROVE
M A J O R
P R O J E C T
O F T H I S
P R O J E C T
FREEWAYS
I S
O N E - W A Y
STREETS
T O T H E S T A D I U M
A N D T H EN.W.
1 8 T H - 1 9 T H
WHEN
C O N S U M M A T E D .
U T I L I Z E S
A N DS A V I E R
C O N N E C T I O N
L O C A T I O N
A N D G R A D I E N T
S T R E E T
ON N . W . R A L E I G H
D I R E C T
T H EP R E S E N T
A S T O A L I G N M E N T
P O R T I O N
R O U T I N G
AFFORD
BOTH
WHICH
A N D
AVENUE
I N -
ONE-WAY
COUPLET.
T H I S
R E L I E F
P R E S S W A Y ,
AND
A S I T W I L L
SUNSET
MAJOR
A R T E R I A L
F O R T H E S U N S E T
HIGHWAY
W I L L
AFFORD
FREEWAY
A L L O W
AREAS
T R A F F I C
EAST
C E R T A I N
A N D T H E BARNES
FROM
OF CEDAR
AMOUNT O F
ROAD E X -
T H E H l L L S B O R O
MILL
TO U S E
THIS
STREET.
Ml 9 - CORNELL ROAD
COST
FROM
TO
LENGTH
(MILES)
S U N S E T
S K Y L I N E
FREEWAY
B O U L E V A R D
TOTAL
S K Y L I N E
B O U L E V A R D
4 . 30
S T A D I U M
FREEWAY
2 . 84
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
5 , 000
10.000
7.14
-144-
LANES
NO.
GRADING
ft
STRUCTURES
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
PAVING
($)
($)
7 50 , 000 '
750,000
350,000
6 50 . 000
600,000
- -
1,250,000
150.000
1 . 4 0 0 . 000
1 . 400.000
600,000
2.000.000
500 . 0 0 0
2 . 500 . 0 0 0
1.100.000
THE
OF
O N L Y
H I G H W A Y ,
T R A F F I C
P R O P O S E D
WOULD
THE
T H E C L A C K A M A S
B E
F R O M
WOULD
A F F O R D E D
R O A D ,
F E L T
N E C E S S A R Y
C L A C K A M A S
C O N N E C T I O N
F R E E W A Y
A N D O N
THAT
FOUR-LANE
W H I C H
B U T C O M M E R C I A L
I T I S E X P E C T E D
U S E THIS
L A K E
I S
E A S T E R N
I N D U S T R I A L
K I E .
T R A F F I C
B O T H
O F
SOME
MAJOR
I N
A N D
P A R T
T H A T
8 2 N D
A N DT H E
O F
V E H I C L E S
STREET
B Y
A R E A
A V E N U E
T H E C I T Y
5 , 0 0 0
N O T
I N D U S T R I A L
C O U N T Y
T H E C L A C K A M A S
B E T W E E N
I N T O
I S
S O
A N D
M L L W A U -
P E R
D A Y
1 9 7 5 .
M20 - LAKE ROAD

COST
S E C T I O N
FROM
TO
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LENGTH
(MILES)
TOTAL
F R E E W A Y
C A S C A D E
F R E E W A Y
2 . 35
1 0 . 000
LANES
GRADING
NO.
STRUCTURES
($)
($)
350 . 0 0 0
350,000
2.35
&
PAVING
'
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
350 . 000
125.000
47 5 0 0 0
350.000
1 25.000
475 0 0 0
L
-145
T H I S
4 , 0 0 0
V E H I C L E S
P R O V E M E N T
T R I A L
TO
THERE
I S
HIGHWAY
I S
ALREADY
AN
T R A F F I C
O N L Y
1 9 7 5 .
I N
DEVELOPMENT
I M P O R T A N T
AN
T H E AREA
T H E R E
I N
ARTERY
W I L L
SOME
I M P O R T A N T
R E S U L T ,
W H I C H
S E R V I C I N G
I S
A S
L O G TRUCK
BY
DEVELOPMENT
F A C I L I T I E S .
I N
A L T H O U G H
D A Y
A N D WAREHOUSING
R A I L
INCREASE
OF
AS
R O U T E ,
P E R
I N
A D J A C E N T
W I L L
T H I S
BE
AREA.
T H E
C O N T I N U E
TO
I M -
I N D U S -
AN
T H I S
H A N D L I N G
U S E
SUCH
F A C I L I T Y .
M21 - CLACKAMAS HIGHWAY

CLACKAMAS CUTOFF - CARVER
S E C T
COST
O N
FROM
TO
LENGTH
(MILES)
CLACKAMAS
TOTAL
CARVER
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
4 . 000
2 . 55
2 . 55
LANES
NO.
4
GRADING
&
PAviNG
($)
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
(*)
($)
400.000
50 . 0 0 0
450.000
125. 000
57 5 . 0 0 0
400 , 000
50 . 0 0 0
450 , 000
125,000
575.000
146-
STRUCTURES
T H I S
NORTH-SOUTH
NECTS
T H E
GRESHAM
DAY
B A N F I E L D
AND
WOULD
ARTERIAL
IT
USE
C O M P L E T E S
STUDIED
F R E E W A Y
IS
EXPECTED
SUCH
IN
T H E
THIS
M O S T
REPORT.
W I T H
E A S T
B U R N S I D E
THAT
SOME
4 , 0 0 0
FOUR-LANE
E A S T E R L Y
|T
VEHICLES
CR0SS- CONNECTING
CON-
S T R E E T
I N
PER
HIGHWAY.
M22 - GRESHAM ROAD

FAIRVIEW - GRESHAM
S E C T I O N
C O S T
FROM
TO
LENGTH
(MILES)
F A i R v i Ew
GRESHAM
3 . 40
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
4 , 000
3 . 40
TOTAL
LANES
NO.
4
GRADING
($)
5 55,000
555,00
-147 -
ft
PAVING
STRUCTURES
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($}
($)
555,000
175,000
730 , 000
555 , 0 0 0
175,000
730 , 000
'
T H I S
F R E E W A Y ,
A N D
SANDY
O T H E R
P A C I F I C
F R E I G H T
F O U R
T O
L A N E S
V E H I C L E S
M O S T
O F
A N D
I T
BROUGHT
1 2 2 N D
W H I C H
I T S
D I S T A N C E .
P E R D A Y WOULD
F E L T
O F
S A N D Y
T H I S
SOME
F A C I L I T Y
AVENUE^
T H E
U N I O N
B O U L E V A R D
P R O J E C T
6 , 0 0 0
T H E
B A N F I E L D
A N D 1 6 2 N D
T H R E E - L A N E
T H A T
U S E T H I S
THROUGH
T H E
N O R T H
P A R A L L E L S
T H E P R E S E N T
I S
A B O U T
BETWEEN
A V E N U E
L I N E
W I D E N I N G
I S
B O U L E V A R D ,
I N D U S T R I A L
T H R O U G H O U T
A M O U N T
I N D U S T R I A L
W O U L D
H I G H W A Y
T O
T O
8 . 0 0 0
I N1 9 7 5 .
M23 - SANDY BOULEVARD

122ND AVENUE - F A I R V I E W
S E C T I O N
C O S T
FROM
TO
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LENGTH
(MILES)
1 2 2 N D
N . E .
A V E N U E
1 6 2 N D
TOTAL
A V E N U E
N . E .
'
1 6 2 N D
F A I R V I E W
A V E N U E
LANES
NO.
GRADING
&
PAVING
($)
($)
2.10
8 . 000
3 25.000
3.10
6 , 000
5 . 20
STRUCTURES
'
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
($)
($)
($)
325 . 000
20.000
47 5 . 0 0 0
47 5 . 0 0 0
30.000
505,000
800 . 000
800.000
50.000
850 . 0 0 0
-148-
345.000
T H I S
B I S E C T I N G
T H E R A P I D L Y
AREA
A N DSERVES
E A S T
B U R N S I D E
VARD
A N D THUS
A S
A S A
A D I S T R I B U T O R
I M A T E L Y
5 , 0 0 0
D I V I S I O N
N O T ONLY
A S W E L L .
V E H I C L E S
E A S T
CONNECTION
S T R E E T .
ACTS
I S A
G R O W I N G
S I D E
BETWEEN
S T R E E T
AS
SANDY
BOULEVARD,
A N DPOWELL
CONNECTOR
T R A F F I C
A R T E R I A L
V O L U M E S
P E R D A YA R EE X P E C T E D
BOULE-
STREET
O F
BUT
A P P R O X -
T OU S E T H I S
ROAD .
M24 - 162ND AVENUE

SANDY BOULEVARD - POWELL VALLEY ROAD
SECTION
C O S T
FROM
TRAFFIC
(1975)
(ADT)
LENGTH
TO
(MILES)
N . E .
S A N D Y
B U R N S I D E
B U R N S I D E
B O U L E V A R D
P O W E L L
S T R E E T
TOTAL
S T R E E T
V A L L E Y
R O A D
LANES
NO.
1.95
5 . 000
1.90
3.85
5 , 000
GRADING
&
STRUCTURES
CONSTR.
R/W
TOTAL
<*>
($)
($)
($)
PAVING
($)
320 . 0 0 0
120,000
320 . 000
335 , 0 0 0
335,000
125,000
460 . 000
6 55,000
655.000
145.000
900 . 000
L
-...., ...
r
-149-
440 . 000
PUBLICATIONS
OF THE OREGON STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION

TECHNICAL BULLETINS
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
L o a d i n g
T e s t s
o n a New C o m p o s i t e - t y p e
S h o r t - s p a n
Highway
B r i d g e
C o m b i n i n g
C o n c r e t e and Timber
in F l e x u r e , by B a l d o c k and M c C u l l o u g h .
1933.
( R e v i s e d May, 1 9 4 1 ) .
2* A p p l i c a t i o n of F r e y s s i n e t M e t h o d of C o n c r e t e A r c h C o n s t r u c t i o n to the
R o g u e R i v e r B r i d g e in O r e g o n by Gemeny
and M c C u l l o u g h .
1933.
3* L o a d i n g Tests
on S t e e l Deck
P l a t e Girder
B r i d g e with
Integral Concrete
F l o o r , by P a x s o n .
1934.
4* D e s i g n of Waterway
A r e a s for B r i d g e s and C u l v e r t s , by M c C u l l o u g h .
1934.
5 * The E f f e c t of H i g h w a y D e s i g n on Vehicle
S p e e d and Fuel
C o n s u m p t i o n , by
Beakey.
19 37.
6 The E f f e c t of Heavy
M o t o r T r a n s p o r t on H i g h w a y B r i d g e S t r e s s e s , by
M c C u l l o u g h and P a x s o n .
19 37.
7 The E c o n o m i c s of H i g h w a y P l a n n i n g , by M c C u l l o u g h and B e a k e y .
1937.
(Revised September,
1938).
8 D e t e r m i n a t i o n of H i g h w a y S y s t e m S o l v e n c i e s , by M c C u l l o u g h .
1937.
9 The M e r i t S y s t e m for E n g i n e e r i n g P e r s o n n e l , by B a l d o c k and M c C u l l o u g h .
1938.
10* An A n a l y s i s of the H i g h w a y Tax S t r u c t u r e in O r e g o n , by M c C u l l o u g h , B e a k e y ,
and Van S c o y .
1938.
11 An E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s of S h o r t - s p a n S u s p e n s i o n B r i d g e s for M o d e r n H i g h w a y
L o a d i n g s , by M c C u l l o u g h , P a x s o n and S m i t h . 1 9 3 8 .
12 L i g h t - r e f l e c t i n g C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of P a v e m e n t S u r f a c e s , by P a x s o n and
Everson. 1 9 3 9 .
13 R a t i o n a l D e s i g n M e t h o d s for S h o r t - s p a n S u s p e n s i o n B r i d g e s for M o d e r n
H i g h w a y L o a d i n g s , by M c C u l l o u g h , P a x s o n , and S m i t h .
1940.
14* The D e r i v a t i o n of D e s i g n C o n s t a n t s for S u s p e n s i o n B r i d g e A n a l y s i s , by
M c C u l l o u g h , P a x s o n and S m i t h .
1940.
15 The E x p e r i m e n t a l V e r i f i c a t i o n of Theory
for S u s p e n s i o n B r i d g e A n a l y s i s ,
by M c C u l l o u g h , P a x s o n and R o s e c r a n s . 1 9 4 2 .
16 TransCo I u m b i a R i v e r I n t e r s t a t e B r i d g e S t u d i e s , a J o i n t R e p o r t , by the
W a s h i n g t o n D e p a r t m e n t of H i g h w a y s and the O r e g o n S t a t e H i g h w a y D e p a r t m e n t .
1944.
17 The E f f e c t of S u r f a c e Type,
Al ignment,
and Traffic
Con ge s t i on of V e h i c u l a r
Fuel
C o n s u m p t i o n , by B e a k e y , C r a n d a l I , K l e i n , and H e a d .
1944.
18 M u l t i p l e - s p a n S u s p e n s i o n B r i d g e s , D e v e l o p m e n t and E x p e r i m e n t a l
Verification
of T h e o r i e s , by M c C u l l o u g h , P a x s o n and R o s e c r a n s . 1 9 4 4 .
19 M a n u a l of I n s t r u c t i o n s for C o n s t r u c t i o n D e p a r t m e n t E m p l o y e e s , by S m i t h and
Libby.
1946.
St a n d a r d H i g h w a y S p i r a l s , by L i b b y . 1 9 4 9 .
20
H i g h w a y Guard
F e n c e , by F i n k b i n e r .
1950.
21
S i g n L e g a b i l i t y Study,
by T r a f f i c E n g i n e e r i n g D i v i s i o n . 1 9 5 4 .
22
Supply
Exhausted
-1 5 0 -
TECHNICAL REPORTS
Report
of the Interim
Committee appointed
Motor Transportation
Act,
by the Interim
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
An Inventory of City Streets in Oregon, by Beakey, Van Scoy, and

Walton. 1938.
38-1A Addenda to an Inventory of City Streets in Oregon, by Beakey,
Van Scoy, and Walton. 1938.
38-2 Rural Road Inventory of the State-wide Highway Planning Survey, by
Beakey, Van Scoy, and Walton. 1938.
38-3 Motor Vehicle Allocation and Road Use Surveys of the State-wide
Highway Planning Survey, by Beakey, Van Scoy and Myers. 1938.
38-4 Fiscal Survey of the State-wide Highway Planning Survey, by Beakey,
Van Scoy, and Keef. 1938.
38-5 Rural Traffic Survey of the State-wide Highway Planning Survey, by
Beakey, Glenn, and Manning. 1938.
38-5A* Annual Daily Traffic Density Tables of the Rural Traffic Survey,
State-wide Highway Planning Survey (report accompanied by traffic
station maps--price $5.00), by Beakey, Glenn, and Manning. 1938.
38-6 Urban Traffic Survey (part I and part II), by Beakey, Glenn, and
Manning. 1938.
39-1 Data Supplementary to Interim Committee Report of January 1, 1937,
by Beakey and Myers. 1939.
A
State-wide Survey of Aggregates, by Finkbiner, 1939.
39-2
39-3* Notes on the Application of Soil Mechanics to Highway Excavations
and Embankments, by Paxson and Smith. 1939.
39-4 Offset Tables for Vertical Carves, by Swart. 1939.
39-5 Skid-resistant Characteristics of Oregon Pavement Surfaces by Beakey,
Klein and Brown. 1939.
39-6* Record of Road Costs and Earnings on the Oregon State Highway System
for the Calendar Year 1937, by Probert and Bonnett. 1939.
40-1 Traffic Density Tables for 1940, by Beakey and Manning. 1940.
40-2 A Study of Expansion Joint Behavior in a Typical Western Oregon
Pavement, by McCullough, Smith, and Webber. 1940.
40-3 Data Supplementary to Interim Committee Report of January 1, 1937,
by Baldock, Beakey, and Myers. 1941.
42-2 Data Supplementary to Technical Bulletin No. 10, by McCullough and
Myers. 1942.
42-3 The Fees and Taxes Paid by the Road Users for the Highway Facilities
Provided, by Baldock and McCullough. 1942.
43-1 Manual of Standard Practice for Paving Inspectors, by Finkbiner and
O'Neil. 1943.
43-2 Manual of Standard Practice for Sampling Construction Materials, by
Finkbiner. 1943.
43-3 Traffic Density Tables for 1942, by Crandall and Stein. 1943.
43-4 The Geometric Design of Highway Alignments and Highway Intersections,
by Baldock. 1943.
44-1 Traffic Density Tables for 1943, by Crandall and Stein. 1944.
44-2 Effect of Expansion Joint Spacing in Typical Concrete Pavements of
Western Oregon, by Paxson and Richards. 1944.
38-1
* Supply Exhausted
-151 -
No.
No.
44-3
44-4
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
45-1
46-1
47-1
48-1
48-2
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
49-1
49-2
49-3
50-1
50-2
No.
No.
51-1
51-2
No.
No.
52-1
52-2
No.
52-3
No.
No.
52-4
53-1
No.
53-2
No.
54-1
No.
54-2
No.
54-3
No.
54-4
No.
54-5
No.
55-i
No.
55-2
No.
55-3
No.
55-4
No.
55-5
to study
Committee.
the
19 37.
A Study of Rural Sidewalks, by Beakey, Crandall, and Head. 1944.

Log Scale Measurements vs. Weight as a Measure for Load Regulations,
by Paxson and Spaulding. 1944.
Traffic Density Tables for 1944, by Crandall and Stein. 1945.
Traffic Density Tables for 1945, by Crandall, Stein, and Gately. 1946.
Motor Vehicle Traffic Accident Analysis Coding Manual, by Crandall,
Head, and Taylor. 1948.
Traffic Density Tables for 1948, by Crandall and Manning. 1949.
1946 Portland Metropolitan Area Traffic Survey 0-D Study. 1949.
1946 Portland Metropolitan Area Traffic Survey Parking Study. 1949
Traffic Density Tables for 1949, by Crandall and Gately. 1950.
1948 Traffic Accidents and Accident Rates, by Crandall, Johnson, and
Taylor. 1950.
Traffic Volume Tables for 1950, by Crandall and Gately. 1951.
Taylor. 1951.
Traffic Volume Tables for 1951, by Crandall and Gately. 1952.
Taylor. 1952
Eugene-Springfield Area Origin-Destination Study and Route Analysis.
October, 1952.
Eugene Parking Study. October, 1952.
Traffic Volume Tables for 1952, by Traffic Engineering Division,
Planning Survey Section. July, 1953.
1951 Accidents and Accident Rates, by Traffic Engineering Division.
May, 1953.
Planning Survey Section. May, 1954.
1952 Accidents and Accident Rates, by Traffic Engineering Division,
February 1954.
Traffic Survey Report, City of Albany, by Traffic Engineering Division,
May, 1954.
Traffic Study, City of Medford, by Traffic Engineering Division.
September, 1954.
1953 Traffic Accidents and Accident Rates, by Traffic Engineering
Division. November, 1954.
Planning Survey Section.
1954 Traffic Accidents and Accident Rates, by Traffic Engineering
Division.
Motor Vehicle Traffic Accident Analysis Coding Manual, by Traffic
Engineering Division. January, 1955.
Traffic Survey Roseburg and Vicinity, 1954, by Traffic Engineering
Division. February, 1955.
Freeway and Expressway System, Portland Metropolitan Area, 1955, by
Traffic Engineering Division. June, 1955.

TECHNICAL REPORT No, 55-5. Oregon State Highway Department 1955

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

TECHNICAL REPORT No, 55-5. Oregon State Highway Department 1955

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

TECHNICAL REPORT No, 55-5. Oregon State Highway Department 1955

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TECHNICAL REPORT No, 55-5

Oregon State Highway Department

FREEWAY AND EXPRESSWAY SYSTEM

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION

Oregon State Highway Commission