The document discusses two capital budgeting techniques: net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR). NPV is used to evaluate projects based on the time value of money concept by discounting all cash flows to determine if a project has a positive or zero NPV. IRR indicates the relative rate of return and yield of a project by considering the time value of money and uncertainty of future cash flows. Both techniques are used to evaluate projects but IRR does not always lead to a value maximizing decision like NPV.
The document discusses two capital budgeting techniques: net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR). NPV is used to evaluate projects based on the time value of money concept by discounting all cash flows to determine if a project has a positive or zero NPV. IRR indicates the relative rate of return and yield of a project by considering the time value of money and uncertainty of future cash flows. Both techniques are used to evaluate projects but IRR does not always lead to a value maximizing decision like NPV.
The document discusses two capital budgeting techniques: net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR). NPV is used to evaluate projects based on the time value of money concept by discounting all cash flows to determine if a project has a positive or zero NPV. IRR indicates the relative rate of return and yield of a project by considering the time value of money and uncertainty of future cash flows. Both techniques are used to evaluate projects but IRR does not always lead to a value maximizing decision like NPV.
The concept that I found interesting was time value of money.
I researched this topic and
found out that its used in capital budgeting t6echniques. Net present value (NPV) is an investment appraisal technique which is used to help in taking project choosing decisions. The prime idea on which net present value concept is based is that of time value of money. The net worth of cash flows changes over time and due to this profitability/gain from a project also vary accordingly. A positive NPV demonstrates that the project is desirable. Company also accept project having 0 NPV because at 0 NPV the required return of company is equal to the return of project (Kerzner, 2013). The strength of NPV is that it works well for independent and mutually exclusive projects, takes all cash flows into account, and consider concept of time value of money. However the weakness of NPV is that it gives a dollar figure rather than a percentage figure, which people tend to at times confuse with the cost figure. The internal rate of return (IRR) is an investment appraisal technique which gives a relative rate of return to compare and measure profitability of projects. Its also known as discounted cash flow rate of return (DCFROR). Internal rate of return is very effective in decision making because it indicates the yield, quality and efficiency of a project. The point of difference between NPV and IRR is that it indicates the magnitude and value of a project. The point of decision is that IIR should be greater than cost of capital or minimum acceptable rate of return (Cooper, Cornick, & Redmon, 2011). The strength of IRR is that it considers time value of money, considers uncertainty of future cash flows, and assesses the value increment from the project. The weakness of IRR is that it does not instigate a value maximizing decision. Cooper, W. D., Cornick, M. F., & Redmon, A. (2011). Capital budgeting: A 1990 study of Fortune 500 company practices. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 8(3), 2023. Kerzner, H. R. (2013). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.