Seismic Acceleration Profile For Containment Analysis For Containment Analysis

SEISMIC ACCELERATION PROFILE
FOR CONTAINMENT ANALYSIS

Jia Li
Hongchun Liu
Bechtel Power Corp.
OUTLINE
BACKGROUND
OBJECTIVE
GTSTRUDL FINITE ELEMENT MODEL
BENCHMARK WITH ORIGINAL ANALYSIS AND
ANSYS
RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS VS
VS. EQUIVALENT
STATIC ANALYSIS
CONCLUSION
GTSTRUDL Users Group Annual Meeting, June 2012, page-2
BACKGROUND
Multi-Mode Factor 1.0 ~ 1.5 for Equivalent
St ti A
Static
Analysis
l i per ASCE 4-98
4 98
Two
Two-Step
Step
1. Perform Response Spectrum Analysis to
obtain acceleration profile
2 P
2.
Perform
f
E
Equivalent
i l t Static
St ti Analysis
A l i by
b
applying acceleration profile in Step 1
OBJECTIVE
Evaluate the structure when openings exists
in different bays under earthquake.
Perform Response Spectrum Analysis in
GTSTRUDL to
t obtain
bt i the
th acceleration
l
ti profile.
fil
Apply acceleration profile to the structure as
static earthquake load and compare the results
with Response Spectrum Analysis.
GTSTRUDL MODEL
Shell element:
p portion)
p
)
SBHQ6 and SBHT6 ((dome apex
Element size:
Cylindrical Wall : 3.5
3 5 x 3.5
3 5
Dome:
<=3.5
Boundary Condition: Fixed at bottom.
Model Size:
8041 Joints and 8040 Elements
GTSTRUDL MODEL
Top of Dome:
Top of Ring Girder
Spring Line
Top of Opening
Dome (xx)
Ring Girder (xx)
Concrete Wall (xx)
Buttress (xx)
Liner (xx)
( )
Bottom of Opening
Bay 2-3
Bay 3-4
Bay 6-1
Bay 1-2
Bay 4-6
Y
Z
Bay 5-6
X
Top of Basemat
ANSYS MODEL
Steel (liner)
Concrete
Fixed Base
Over 100,000 nodes and elements

FINITE ELMENT MODEL BENCHMARKING

MODAL ANALYSIS OF INTACT MODEL
Original
O
i i l
COMPARISON
Analysis
ITEM
(OR)
GTSTRUDL
ANSYS
GT
(GTOR)
/OR
/O
ANSYS
(ANSYSOR)
/OR
/O
Fundamental
Frequency
4.40
(Hz)
4.29
(Hz)
2 5%
2.5%
4.30
(Hz)
2.2%
2 2%
Total
Weight
58,631
(kip)
54,570
(kip)
6.9%
57175
(kip)
2.5%
GTSTRUDL ANALYSIS
Response Spectrum analysis is performed in two cases
to consider openings exists in different bays.
Seismic acceleration profile are obtained in horizontal
and vertical directions.
directions
Equivalent Static analysis is also performed in two
cases and
d th
the results
lt compared
d with
ith Response
R
Spectrum
S t
analysis.
PROPOSED CONCRETE OPENINGS

Buttress 2
Buttress 1
Buttress 3
Buttress 6
Buttress 4
Buttress 5
X
CASE I: 3 BAYS OPENING
Note:
Bay in Red: new concrete
Bay in Black: existing concrete
Bay in White: opening
Buttress 2
Buttress 1
Buttress 3
Buttress 6
Buttress 4
Buttress 5
X
CASE II: 2 BAYS OPENING
GTSTRUDL COMMAND:
DELETIONS
ELEMENT GROUP BAY12
BAY12-45'
45'
ADDITIONS
OVERVIEW OF GTSTRUDL MODEL WITH

OPENINGS
RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS

Response Spectra (RS):
5% damping
SPECT
TRAL ACCELE
ERATION (g)
Vertical RS:
2/3 of Horizontal RS.
Modes included:
300
Mass Participation
Percentage:
X : >97%
Y : >95%
Z : >97%
UNDAMPED PERIOD (sec)
ZPA: 0.1g
Peak Acceleration: 0.2g correspond to 1.25Hz
Modal Combination:
SRSS and CQC
FLOWCHART TO OBTAIN ACCELERATION PROFILE

S i i
Seismic
Excitation
Y Dir
Seismic
Excitation
Z Dir
_
X Dir
Y Dir
Z Dir
ahorizontal
Seismic
Excitation
X Dir
2
_X_i
avertical
ahorizontal
_X_i
_Y_i
_
_
avertical
ahorizontal
_Y_i
_
2
_Z_i
avertical
_Z_i
_

ahoriz ontal _X
ahorizontal
ahorizontal
_Z
Z
_Y
0 ahorizontal
_X_i
0 ahorizontal
_Z_i
0 ahorizontal
_Y_i
ahorizontal
avertical
avertical
avertical
_Y
max ahorizontal
_X_i
0 avertical
_Z_i
0 avertical
_Y_i
_Z
1.1
0 avertical
_X
avertical
11
1.1
Maximum of SRSS and CQC is selected
max avertical
_X , ahorizontal _Z
ahorizontal
_Y
Maximum of SRSS and CQC is selected
_X
X , avertical _Z
Z
avertical
_Y
Y
280
280
260
260
240
240
220
220
ELEVATION(ft)
ELEV
VATION(ft)
ACCELERATION PROFILE
200
180
200
180
160
160
140
140
120
120
100
0.000
100
0.000
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
HORIZONTALACCELERATION(g)
3BAYSOPENING
2BAYSOPENING
0.250
0.300
ENVELOPE
0.050
3BAYSOPENING
0.100
0.150
0.200
VERTICALACCELERATION(g)
2BAYSOPENING
0.250
0.300
ENVELOPE
GTSTRUDL COMMAND
LIST
S RESPONSE
S O S SPECTRUM
S C
ACC
CC MODAL
O
CO
COMB RMS
S CQC JOINT
O
'CJ-5001'
C
TO
O
'CJ-5116' BY 5
DOMINANT FREQUENCY COMPARISON
3BAYOPENING
Mode
1
2
13
2BAYOPENING
MassParti.
Freq(Hz)
q ( ) Percentage
g Direction
2.38
67%
X
2.45
66%
Z
10 10
10.10
41%
Mode
1
2
12
13
MassParti.
Freq(Hz)
q ( ) Percentage
g Direction
2.17
68%
Z
3.47
70%
X
10.75
31%
Y
10.78
26%
Y
STATIC ANALYSIS
Top of Dome:
Y
Z
Top of
Basemat:
0.171
0.280
0.171
0.280
0.131
0.280
0.126
0.280
0.121
0.280
0.098
0.264
0.092
0.249
0.085
0.242
0.078
0.222
0.072
0.209
0.066
0.185
0.057
0.160
0.043
0.127
0.023
0.079
Vertical
Horizontal (g)
GTSTRUDL COMMAND
LOAD 'SSE_V' 'VERTICAL SEISMIC
ELEMENT LOAD
GROUP 'MASS_1' BODY FORCE GLOBAL BY 3.51
RS vs STATIC ANALYSIS
DISPLACEMENT COMPARISON
300
300
280
280
260
260
240
240
220
Elevatio
on(ft)
Elevation(ft)
220
200
180
200
180
160
160
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.00
Horizontal Displacement (in)

HorizontalDisplacement(in)
RS(H90+V)
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
Horizontal Displacement (in)
RS(H0+V)
Static(H90+V)
0.60
0.70
Static(H0+V)
2 BAY OPENING
GTSTRUDL COMMAND
LIST DISPLACEMENT JOINTS 'CJ-5001' 'CJ-49001' 'DJ-12 'DJ-0'
260
240
240
220
220
200
200
Elevation(ft)
Elevation(ft)
TOTAL SHEAR COMPARISON

260
180
160
180
160
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
0
5000
10000
15000
5000
T l Sh
TotalShear(kip)
(ki )
RS(H90+V)
Static(H90+V)
TopofOpening
BottomofOpening
10000
15000
TotalShear(kip)
RS(H0+V)
Static(H0+V)
2 BAY OPENING
GTSTRUDL COMMAND
LIST SUM FORCES TITLE 'CUT1' ABOUT X 0.0 Y 0 Z 0.0 JOINT 'CJ-1001' TO 'CJ-1120' ELEMENT 'CE-1001' TO 'CE-1120'
260
260
240
240
220
220
200
200
Eleevation(ft)
Eleevation(ft)
OVERTURNING MOMENT COMPARISON
180
160
180
160
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
OverturningMoment(kipft)
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
RS(H90+V)
Static(H90+V)
RS (H0+V)
RS(H0+V)
Static(H0+V)
BottomofOpening
TopofOpening
BottomofOpening
TopofOpening
2 BAY OPENING
GTSTRUDL COMMAND
DISPLACEMENT COMPARISON
300
300
280
280
260
260
240
240
220
Elevatio
on(ft)
Elevation(ft)
220
200
180
200
180
160
160
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
0 00
0.00
0 10
0.10
0 20
0.20
0 30
0.30
0 40
0.40
0 50
0.50
0 60
0.60
0 70
0.70
0.00
RS(H90+V)
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
RS(H0+V)
Static(H90+V)
0.60
0.70
Static(H0+V)
3 BAY OPENING
GTSTRUDL COMMAND
LIST DISPLACEMENT JOINTS 'CJ-5001' 'CJ-49001' 'DJ-12 'DJ-0'
260
260
240
240
220
220
200
200
Elevattion(ft)
Elevattion(ft)
TOTAL SHEAR COMPARISON
180
160
180
160
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
0
5000
RS(H90+V)
10000
15000
TotalShear(kip)
Total
Shear (kip)
Static(H90+V)
TopofOpening
5000
RS(H0+V)
TopofOpening
BottomofOpening
10000
15000
TotalShear(kip)
Total
Shear (kip)
Static(H0+V)
BottomofOpening
3 BAY OPENING
GTSTRUDL COMMAND
260
260
240
240
220
220
200
200
Elevation(ft)
Elevattion(ft)
OVERTURNING MOMENT COMPARISON
180
160
180
160
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
0
500000
1000000
1500000
RS(H90+V)
(
)
Static(H90+V)
(
)
BottomofOpening
2000000
500000
1000000
1500000
RS(H0+V)
Static(H0+V)
BottomofOpening
TopofOpening
2000000
TopofOpening
3 BAY OPENING
GTSTRUDL COMMAND
3BAYOPENING
Weight
C.G(Y)
(kip)
53584
RS
ELF
BaseShear
BaseMoment
BaseShear
BaseMoment
(ft)
(kip)
(kipft)
(kip)
(kipft)
113 97
113.97
6538
1022273
12066
1544656
2BAYOPENING
Weight
C.G(Y)
(ki )
(kip)
(f )
(ft)
56335
114.65
RS
BaseShear BaseMoment
(ki )
(kip)
(ki f )
(kipft)
7534
1105869
ELF
BaseShear BaseMoment
(ki )
(kip)
(ki f )
(kipft)
13360
1715296
CONCLUSIONS
The acceleration profile obtained is adequate and
reasonably conservative.
GTSTRUDLs Shell element is convenient to build the
cylinder structure to perform seismic analysis.
GTSTRUDLs RSA is reliable and easy to use. Various
results (acc,
(acc deflections,
deflections base shear etc) can be easily
output and post processed to meet engineers needs.
Equivalent static seismic load approach will, in general,
provide very conservative results.
Q&A?

Seismic Acceleration Profile For Containment Analysis For Containment Analysis

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Seismic Acceleration Profile For Containment Analysis For Containment Analysis

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SEISMIC ACCELERATION PROFILE

FOR CONTAINMENT ANALYSIS

GTSTRUDL Users Group Annual Meeting, June 2012, page-3

GTSTRUDL Users Group Annual Meeting, June 2012, page-4

GTSTRUDL Users Group Annual Meeting, June 2012, page-5

Top of Ring Girder

Over 100,000 nodes and elements

FINITE ELMENT MODEL BENCHMARKING

GTSTRUDL Users Group Annual Meeting, June 2012, page-8

GTSTRUDL Users Group Annual Meeting, June 2012, page-9

PROPOSED CONCRETE OPENINGS

OVERVIEW OF GTSTRUDL MODEL WITH

GTSTRUDL Users Group Annual Meeting, June 2012, page-11

RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS

GTSTRUDL Users Group Annual Meeting, June 2012, page-12

FLOWCHART TO OBTAIN ACCELERATION PROFILE

FLOWCHART TO OBTAIN ACCELERATION PROFILE

Maximum of SRSS and CQC is selected

Maximum of SRSS and CQC is selected

GTSTRUDL Users Group Annual Meeting, June 2012, page-14

FLOWCHART TO OBTAIN ACCELERATION PROFILE

GTSTRUDL Users Group Annual Meeting, June 2012, page-15

DOMINANT FREQUENCY COMPARISON

GTSTRUDL Users Group Annual Meeting, June 2012, page-17

GTSTRUDL Users Group Annual Meeting, June 2012, page-18

Horizontal Displacement (in)

TOTAL SHEAR COMPARISON

OVERTURNING MOMENT COMPARISON

TOTAL SHEAR COMPARISON

OVERTURNING MOMENT COMPARISON

GTSTRUDL Users Group Annual Meeting, June 2012, page-25

GTSTRUDL Users Group Annual Meeting, June 2012, page-26

GTSTRUDL Users Group Annual Meeting, June 2012, page-27

You might also like