Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Memory Aid - Beda PDF
Memory Aid - Beda PDF
MEMORY AID
IN
CRIMINAL LAW
BOOK ONE
CRIMINAL LAW - that branch or division
of law which defines crimes, treats of
their nature and provides for their
punishment.
CHARACTERISTICS OF CRIMINAL LAW
1. GENERAL - it is binding on all
persons who live or sojourn in the
Philippine territory (Art. 14, NCC)
EXCEPTIONS:
a) Treaty stipulations
b) Laws of preferential application
c) Principles of Public International
Law.
The following persons are
exempted:
a. Sovereigns and other
chief of state
b. Ambassadors,ministers,
plenipotentiary, minister
resident and charges
daffaires.
Consuls,
FRENCH RULE:
GENERAL RULE: Crimes committed
aboard vessel within the territorial
waters of a country are not triable
in the courts of said country.
EXCEPTION: When their commission
affects the peace and security of the
territory or when the safety of the
state is endangered.
ART. 3 FELONIES
Felonies are acts
punishable by the RPC.
or
omissions
2. Culpable
Felonies - performed
without malice.
Requisites of CULPA:
a. Freedom
b. Intelligence
c. Negligence and Imprudence
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
IN
extent.
The
moral
trait of the
offender is not
considered. It
is enough that
the prohibited
act
was
voluntarily
done.
2. As to
use
of
good
faith as
a
defense
Good faith or
lack of criminal
intent is a valid
defense; unless
the crime is the
result of culpa.
Good faith is
not a defense.
3. As to
degree
of
accomplishment of
the
crime
The degree of
accomplishment
of the crime is
taken
into
account
in
punishing
the
offender.
4. As to
mitigati
ng and
aggravat
ing
circumstances
5. As to
degree
of
participation
Mitigating and
aggravating
circumstances
are taken into
account
in
imposing
the
penalty.
When there is
more than one
offender,
the
degree
of
participation of
each in the
commission of
the crime is
taken
into
account.
Mitigating and
aggravating
circumstances
are generally
not taken into
account.
CRIMINAL LAW
6. As to
what
laws are
violated
Violation of the
RPC
(General
rule)
Violation of
Special Laws
(General rule)
1. Is the moving
power which impels
one to act
2.
Is
element
crime
NOT
of
an
the
3. Is essential only
when the identity of
the perpetrator is in
doubt
Degree
of
participation is
generally not
taken
into
account.
All
who
participated in
the act are
punished
to
the
same
ART. 6 CONSUMMATED,
FRUSTRATED & ATTEMPTED
FELONIES
STAGES OF EXECUTION:
CONSUMMATED FELONY
When all the elements necessary for
its execution and accomplishment
are present.
1. FRUSTRATED FELONY
ELEMENTS:
a) The offender performs all the acts of
execution.
b) All the acts performed would
produce
the
felony
as
a
consequence.
c) But the felony is not produced.
d) By the reason of causes independent
of the will of the perpetrator.
WHAT CRIMES DO NOT ADMIT OF
FRUSTRATED STAGE?
1) Rape
2) Bribery
3) Corruption of Public Officers
4) Adultery
5) Physical Injury
2. ATTEMPTED FELONY
ELEMENTS:
a) The
offender
commences
the
commission of the felony directly by
overt acts.
b) He does not perform all the acts of
execution which should produce the
felony.
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
REQUISITES OF CONSPIRACY
1. That 2 or more persons came to an
agreement.
2. That the agreement pertains to the
commission of a felony.
3. That the execution of the felony was
decided upon.
2 CONCEPTS OF CONSPIRACY
1. Conspiracy as a crime by itself.
EXAMPLE: conspiracy to commit
rebellion or insurrection, treason,
sedition.
2. Conspiracy as a means of committing
a crime
a) There is a previous and express
agreement;
b) The participants acted in concert
or simultaneously which is
indicative of a meeting of the
minds
towards
a
common
criminal objective. There is an
implied agreement.
GENERAL RULE: Mere conspiracy or
proposal to commit a felony is not
punishable
since
they
are
only
preparatory acts
EXCEPTION: in cases in which the law
specially provides a penalty therefor,
such as in treason, coup detat, and
rebellion or insurrection
The act of one is the act of all
GENERAL RULE: When conspiracy is
established,
all
who
participated
therein, irrespective of the quantity or
quality of his participation is liable
equally, whether conspiracy is preplanned or instantaneous. EXCEPTION:
Unless one or some of the conspirators
committed some other crime which is
not part of the intended crime.
EXCEPTION TO THE EXCEPTION: When
the act constitutes a single indivisible
offense.
IN
CRIMINAL LAW
Conspiracy
may
be
inferred when two or more persons
proceed to perform overt acts
towards the accomplishment of the
same felonious objective, with each
doing his act, so that their acts
though seemingly independent were
in fact connected, showing a
common design.
UNLAWFUL AGGRESSION
- is equivalent to an actual
physical assault or, at least
- threatened assault of an
immediate and imminent kind which is
offensive and positively strong, showing
the wrongful intent to cause injury.
GENERAL RULE:
RPC provisions are
supplementary to special laws.
EXCEPTION:
1. Where the special law provides
otherwise; and
2. When the provisions of the RPC are
impossible of application, either by
express provision or by necessary
implication.
Thus, when the special law adopts the
penalties imposed in the RPC, such as
reclusin
perpetua
or
reclusin
temporal, the provisions of the RPC on
imposition of penalties based on stage of
execution, degree of participation, and
attendance of mitigating and aggravating
circumstances may be applied by
necessary implication.
Chapter Two: Justifying Circumstances
and Circumstances Which Exempt from
Criminal Liability (Arts. 11-12)
ART. 11. JUSTIFYING
CIRCUMSTANCES
JUSTIFYING CIRCUMSTANCES are those
where the act of a person is said to be in
accordance with law, so that such person
is deemed not to have transgressed the
law and is free from both criminal and
civil liability. There is no civil liability,
except in par. 4 of Art. 11, where the
civil liability is borne by the persons
benefited by the act.
1. SELF- DEFENSE
REQUISITES:
a) Unlawful aggression (condition sine
qua non);
b) Reasonable necessity of the means
employed to prevent or repel it; and
part of
himself.
the
person
defending
Perfect
equality
between
the
weapons used by the one defending
himself and that of the aggressor is
not
required,
nor
material
commensurability
between
the
means of attack and defense.
REASON:
Because
the
person
assaulted does not have sufficient
tranquility of mind to think and to
calculate.
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
Stand ground when in the right - the
law does not require a person to retreat
when his assailant is rapidly advancing
upon him with a deadly weapon.
Under Republic Act 9262, known as the
Anti- Violence against Women and their
Children Act of 2004:
Victim-survivors who are found
by the courts to be suffering from
Battered Woman Syndrome do not incur
any
criminal
or
civil
liability
notwithstanding the absence of any of
the
elements
for
justifying
circumstances of self-defense under the
RPC. (Sec. 26, R.A. No. 9262) The law
provides for an additional justifying
circumstance.
Battered Woman Syndrome
refers to a scientifically defined pattern
of
psychological
and
behavioral
symptoms found in women living in
battering relationships as a result of
cumulative abuse.
Battery refers to any act of
inflicting physical harm upon the woman
or her child resulting to physical and
psychological or emotional distress.
2. DEFENSE OF RELATIVES
REQUISITES:
1. Unlawful Aggression;
2. Reasonable necessity of the
means employed to prevent or
repel it; and
3. In case the provocation was
given by the person attacked,
the one making the defense had
no part therein.
RELATIVES THAT CAN BE DEFENDED:
1. Spouse
2. Ascendants
3. Descendants
4. Legitimate, natural or adopted
brothers and sisters, or relatives by
affinity in the same degrees.
5. Relatives by consanguinity within the
fourth civil degree.
3. DEFENSE OF STRANGER
REQUISITES:
1. Unlawful Aggression;
IN
CRIMINAL LAW
of its illegality
negligent.
and
he
is
not
EXEMPTING
CIRCUMSTANCE
4. Since there is no
crime,
nor
a
criminal, there is
also no criminal or
civil liability. (except
Art. 11, par. 4)
4. Since there is a
crime
committed
though there is no
criminal, there is
civil liability.
3.
Since the act
complained of is
actually wrong there
is a crime but since
the
actor
acted
without
voluntariness, there
is no dolo nor culpa
1. IMBECILITY OR INSANITY
Insanity or imbecility exists when there
is a complete deprivation of intelligence
or freedom of the will.
An insane person is not so exempt if
it can be shown that he acted during
a lucid interval. But an imbecile is
Insanity
exists
when
there is a complete deprivation of
intelligence in committing the act.
Mere abnormality of the mental
faculties
will
not
exclude
imputability. The accused must be
"so insane as to be incapable of
entertaining criminal intent." He
must be deprived of reason and
acting without the least discernment
because there is a complete absence
of the power to discern or a total
deprivation of freedom of the will.
(PEOPLE vs. ANTONIO, GR No.
144266, November 27, 2002)
2. PERSON UNDER NINE YEARS OF AGE
Must
have
discernment.
acted
without
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
a)
b)
4.
OR
ELEMENTS:
1. A person is performing a lawful act;
2. With due care;
3. He causes injury to another by mere
accident;
4. Without fault or intention of causing
it.
5. A PERSON WHO ACTS UNDER THE
COMPULSION OF AN IRRESISTABLE
FORCE
ELEMENTS:
1. That the compulsion is by means
of physical force.
2. That the physical force must be
irresistable.
3. That the physical force must
come from a third person.
IN
CRIMINAL LAW
7. INSUPERABLE CAUSE.
INSUPERABLE CAUSE some motive
which has lawfully, morally or physically
prevented a person to do what the law
commands.
ELEMENTS:
1. That an act is required by law to be
done.
2. That a person fails to perform such
act.
3. That his failure to perform such act
was due to some lawful or
insuperable cause.
Examples:
10
mitigating circumstances
from the same fact.
ORDINARY
PRIVILEGED
Source
Subsections
1-10 of Art.
13 (RPC)
If not offset
(by
an
aggravating
circumstanc
e) it will
operate to
have
the
penalty
imposed at
its minimum
period,
provided the
penalty is a
divisible one
May
be
offset
by
aggravating
circumstance
Arts. 68, 69
and 64 of
RPC
It operates
to
reduce
the penalty
by one to
two degrees
depending
upon
what
the
law
provides
As to the
effect
INSTIGATION
1.
Ways and
means
are
resorted to for the
capture
of
lawbreaker in the
execution of his
criminal plan.
2. not a bar to
the
prosecution
and conviction of
the lawbreaker
1.
Instigator
induces the wouldbe
accused
to
commit the crime,
hence he becomes a
co-principal.
2. it will result in
the acquittal of the
accused.
As to offset
Cannot
offset
1. INCOMPLETE
JUSTIFYING
EXEMPTING CIRCUMSTANCES
be
OR
arising
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
11
MEMORY AID
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
3.
NO INTENTION TO COMMIT SO
GRAVE A WRONG
Rule for the application:
Can be taken into account only when the
facts proven show that there is a notable
and evident disproportion between the
means employed to execute the criminal
act and its consequences.
4. PROVOCATION OR THREAT
PROVOCATION any unjust or improper
conduct or act of the offended party,
capable of exciting, inciting or irritating
any one.
REQUISITES:
1. The provocation must be sufficient.
2. It must originate from the offended
party.
3. The provocation must be immediate
to the commission of the crime by
the person who is provoked.
CRIMINAL LAW
IN
VINDICATION
1.
It is made
directly only to the
person committing
the felony.
1.
The grave
offense
may
be
committed
also
against
the
offenders relatives
mentioned by law.
2.
The offended
party must have
done
a
grave
offense
to
the
offender
or
his
relatives mentioned
by law.
3. The vindication
of the grave offense
may be proximate,
which admits of an
INTERVAL of time.
5. PASSION OR OBFUSCATION
It requires that:
1. The accused acted upon an impulse.
2. The impulse must be so powerful
that it naturally produced passion or
obfuscation in him.
REQUISITES:
12
the
PROVOCATION
- produced by an
impulse which may
be
caused
by
provocation
- the offense need
not be immediate. It
is only required that
the influence thereof
lasts
until
the
moment the crime is
committed
- the provocation
comes
from
the
injured party.
7.
-must
immediately
precede
the
commission of the
crime.
REQUISITES
OF
VOLUNTARY
SURRENDER:
1. That the offender had not been
actually arrested;
2. That the offender surrendered
himself to a person in authority or to
the latters agent;
3. That the surrender was voluntary.
WHEN SURRENDER VOLUNTARY
A surrender to be voluntary must be
spontaneous, showing the intent of the
accused
to
submit
himself
unconditionally to the authorities, either
because:
1. he acknowledges his guilt; or
REQUISITES:
1. That the illness of the offender
must diminish the exercise of his
will-power.
2. That such illness should not deprive
the offender of consciousness of his
acts.
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
13
MEMORY AID
EXAMPLES:
1)
Impulse of jealousy, similar
to passion and obfuscation.
2)
Testifying
for
the
prosecution, analogous to plea of
guilty
Chapter Four: Circumstances which
Aggravate Criminal Liability (Art. 14)
Aggravating circumstances are those
which, if attendant in the commission of
the crime, serve to have the penalty
imposed in its maximum period provided
by law for the offense or change the
nature of the crime.
IN
CRIMINAL LAW
BASIS:
They are based on the greater perversity
of the offender manifested in the
commission of the felony as shown by:
1. the motivating power itself,
2. the place of the commission,
3. the means and ways employed
4. the time, or
5. the personal circumstances of the
offender, or the offended party.
KINDS
OF
CIRCUMSTANCES:
AGGRAVATING
14
May be offset by a
mitigating
circumstance.
Cannot be offset by a
mitigating
circumstance
RULES
ON
AGGRAVATING
CIRCUMSTANCES
1. Aggravating circumstances shall not
be appreciated if:
a) They constitute a crime specially
punishable by law, or
b) They are included by the law in
defining a crime and prescribing
a penalty therefor, shall not be
taken into account for the
purpose
of
increasing
the
penalty.
EXAMPLE: That the crime be
committed by means of fire,
explosion (Art. 14, par. 12) is in
itself a crime of arson (Art. 321) or a
crime involving destruction (Art.
324). It is not to be considered to
increase the penalty for the crime of
arson or for the crime involving
destruction.
2. The same rule shall apply with
respect
to
any
aggravating
circumstance inherent in the crime
to such a degree that it must of
necessity accompany the commission
thereof. (Art. 62, par. 2)
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
15
MEMORY AID
This circumstance cannot be taken
IN
CRIMINAL LAW
16
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
17
MEMORY AID
IN
CRIMINAL LAW
PAR. 5. Where
PAR. 2. Contempt
public authorities or insult to public
are engaged in
authorities
the discharge of
their duties
In both
In their office.
Outside
office.
of
their
Public
authority
should not be the
offended party
18
REQUISITES:
1. That armed men or persons took part
in the commission of the crime,
directly or indirectly.
2. That the accused availed himself of
their aid or relied upon them when
the crime was committed.
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
19
MEMORY AID
This
aggravating
circumstance
requires that the armed men are
accomplices who take part in that
minor capacity directly or indirectly,
and not when they were merely
present at the crime scene. Neither
should they constitute a band, for
then
the
proper
aggravating
circumstance would be cuadrilla.
WHEN
THIS
AGGRAVATING
CIRCUMSTANCE
SHALL
NOT
BE
CONSIDERED:
1. When both the attacking party and
the party attacked were equally
armed.
2. When the accused as well as those
who cooperated with him in the
commission of the crime acted under
the same plan and for the same
purpose.
Par. 8. With the
ba
aid of armed
nd
men
As to their number
At least two
This circumstance is
present even if one
of
the
offenders
merely relied on
their aid, for actual
aid is not necessary.
As to their action
Requires that more
than three armed
malefactors
shall
have acted together
in the commission of
an offense.
CRIMINAL LAW
Par. 6 By a
IN
20
It is enough that a
final judgment has
been rendered in
the first offense.
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
21
MEMORY AID
offered the price or promise and the
one who accepted it, both of whom
are principals.
When
another
aggravating
circumstance already qualifies the
crime, any of these aggravating
circumstances shall be considered as
generic aggravating circumstance
only.
PAR. 10 on the
occasion of a
conflagration,
shipwreck, etc.
The
crime
committed on
occasion
of
calamity
misfortune.
is
the
a
or
IN
CRIMINAL LAW
To
establish
evident
premeditation, it must be shown
that there was a period sufficient to
afford
full
opportunity
for
meditation and reflection, a time
adequate to allow the conscience to
overcome the resolution of the will,
as well as outward acts showing the
intent to kill. It must be shown that
the offender had sufficient time to
reflect upon the consequences of his
act but still persisted in his
determination to commit the crime.
(PEOPLE vs. SILVA, et. al., GR No.
140871, August 8, 2002)
The
essence
of
evident
premeditation is that the execution
of the criminal act is preceded by
cool thought and reflection upon the
resolution to carry out the criminal
intent within a space of time
sufficient to arrive at a calm
judgment. (PEOPLE vs. ABADIES, GR
No. 135975, August 14, 2002)
22
CRAFT
Where there is a
direct inducement
by insidious words
or
machinations,
fraud is present.
For instance:
In People vs. San Pedro (Jan. 22,
1980), where the accused
pretended to hire the driver in
order to get his vehicle, it was
held that there was craft
directed to the theft of the
vehicle, separate from the
means subsequently used to
treacherously
kill
the
defenseless driver.
In People vs. Masilang (July 11,
1986) there was also craft where
after hitching a ride, the
accused requested the driver to
take them to a place to visit
somebody, when in fact they had
already planned to kill the
driver.
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
23
MEMORY AID
MEANING OF advantage be taken:
To deliberately use excessive force that
is out of proportion to the means for
self-defense available to the person
attacked. (PEOPLE vs. LOBRIGAS, et. al.,
GR No. 147649, December 17, 2002)
NO
ADVANTAGE
OF
SUPERIOR
STRENGTH IN THE FOLLOWING:
1. One who attacks another with
passion and obfuscation does not
take advantage of his superior
strength.
2. When a quarrel arose unexpectedly
and the fatal blow was struck at a
time when the aggressor and his
victim were engaged against each
other as man to man.
The
element
of
band is appreciated
when the offense is
committed by more
than three armed
malefactors
regardless of the
comparative
strength
of
the
victim or victims.
IN
CRIMINAL LAW
The gravamen of
abuse of superiority
is
the
taking
advantage by the
culprits of their
collective strength
to overpower their
relatively
weaker
victim or victims.
Hence,
what
is
taken into account
here is not the
number
of
aggressors nor the
fact that they are
armed, but their
relative
physical
strength vis-a vis
the offended party.
by a band
abuse of superior
strength
only
and
and
with
24
REQUISITES OF TREACHERY:
1. That at the time of the attack, the
victim was not in a position to
defend himself; and
2. That the offender consciously
adopted the particular means,
method or form of attack employed
by him.
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
25
MEMORY AID
REASON FOR THE RULE: When there
is treachery, it is impossible for
either the intended victim or the
actual victim to defend himself
against the aggression.
TREACHERY ABSORBS:
1. Craft
2. Abuse of superior strength
3. Employing means to weaken the
defense
4. Cuadrilla (band)
5. Aid of armed men
6. Nighttime
Applicable
to
crimes
against
chastity,
less
serious
physical
injuries, light or grave coercion, and
murder.
CRIMINAL LAW
IN
It
involves
the
breaking
(rompimiento)
of
the
enumerated
parts of the house.
Presupposes
that
there is no such
breaking as by entry
through
the
window.
26
2.
Involves
suffering
moral
CRUELTY (PAR.
21)
Refers to physical
suffering
Unlike
mitigating
circumstances
(par. 10, Art. 13), there is no
provision
for
aggravating
circumstances of a similar or
analogous character.
ART. 15 ALTERNATIVE
CIRCUMSTANCES
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
27
MEMORY AID
1. The relationship of stepfather or
stepmother
and
stepson
or
stepdaughter.
REASON: It is the duty of the
stepparents to bestow upon their
stepchildren a mothers/fathers
affection, care and protection.
2. The relationship of adopted parent
and adopted child.
But the relationship of uncle and
niece is not covered by any of the
relationship mentioned.
WHEN RELATIONSHIP MITIGATING AND
WHEN AGGRAVATING:
1. As a rule, relationship is mitigating
in crimes against property, by
analogy to the provisions of Art. 332.
Thus, relationship is mitigating
in the crimes of robbery (Arts.
294-302), usurpation (Art. 312),
fraudulent insolvency (Art. 314)
and arson (Arts. 321-322, 325326).
3.
IN
CRIMINAL LAW
28
However,
corporation
and
partnership can be a passive subject
of a crime.
CRIMINALLY
ART. 17 PRINCIPALS
THE FOLLOWING ARE PRINCIPALS:
1. Those who take a direct part in the
execution of the act (PRINCIPAL BY
DIRECT PARTICIPATION)
2. Those who directly force or induce
others to commit it (PRINCIPAL BY
INDUCTION)
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
29
MEMORY AID
3. Those who cooperate in the
commission of the offense by
another act without which it would
not
have
been
accomplished
(PRINCIPAL
BY
INDISPENSABLE
COOPERATION).
Par. 1 Principals by direct
participation
REQUISITES:
1. That they participated in the
criminal resolution; and
2. That they carried out their plan and
personally took part in its execution
by acts which directly tended to the
same end.
MEANING OF personally took part in
its execution
That the principal by direct participation
must be at the scene of the commission
of the crime, personally taking part in its
execution.
Par. 2 Principals by induction
REQUISITES
1. That the inducement be made
directly with the intention of
procuring the commission of the
crime; and
2. That such inducement be the
determining cause of the commission
of the crime by the material
executor.
IN
CRIMINAL LAW
If
the
person
who
actually
committed the crime had reason of
his own to commit the crime, it
cannot be said that the inducement
was influential in producing the
criminal act.
PRINCIPAL BY
INDUCEMENT
OFFENDER WHO
MADE PROPOSAL
TO COMMIT A
FELONY
30
In both
There is an inducement to commit a crime
When liable
Becomes liable only
when the crime is
committed by the
principal by direct
participation.
The proposal to be
punishable
must
involve only treason
or rebellion.
1. Participation
in
the
criminal
resolution, that is, there is either
anterior conspiracy or unity of
criminal purpose and intention
immediately before the commission
of the crime charged; and
2. Cooperation in the commission of
the offense by performing another
act, without which it would not have
been accomplished.
If
the
cooperation
is
not
indispensable, the offender is only
an accomplice.
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
31
MEMORY AID
and not collective, and each of the
participants is liable only for the act
committed by him.
ART. 18 ACCOMPLICES
Accomplices are persons who,
acting as principals, cooperate in
execution of the offense by previous
simultaneous acts, which are
indispensable to the commission of
crime.
not
the
and
not
the
Before
there
could
be
an
accomplice, there must be a
principal by direct participation.
The person charged as an accomplice
should not have inflicted a mortal
wound. If he inflicted a mortal
wound, he becomes a principal by
direct participation.
In case of doubt, the participation of
the offender will be considered that
of an accomplice rather than that of
a principal.
ART. 19 ACCESSORIES
Accessories are those who
- having knowledge of
the commission of
the crime, and
- without
having
participated therein
either as principals
IN
CRIMINAL LAW
or accomplices, take
part subsequent to
its commission in any
of the following acts:
1. By profiting themselves or assisting
the offender to profit by the effects
of the crime.
2. Assisting the offender to profit by
the effects of the crime.
3. By concealing or destroying the body
of the crime to prevent its discovery.
TWO
CLASSES
OF
ACCESSORIES
CONTEMPLATED IN PAR. 3 OF ART. 19
a) Public officers who harbor, conceal
or assist in the escape of the
principal of any crime (not light
felony) with abuse of his public
functions.
Requisites:
1. The accessory is a public officer.
2. He harbors, conceals, or assists
in the escape of the principal.
3. The public officer acts with
abuse of his public functions.
4. The crime committed by the
principal is any crime, provided
it is not a light felony.
b) Private persons who harbor, conceal
or assist in the escape of the author
of the crime who is guilty of treason,
parricide, murder, or attempts
against the life of the President, or
who is known to be habitually guilty
of some other crime.
Requisites:
1. The accessory is a private
person.
2. He harbors, conceals or assists in
the escape of the author of the
crime.
3. The crime committed by the
principal is either:
32
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
Treason,
Parricide,
Murder,
An attempt against the life of
the President, or
v. That the principal is known to
be habitually guilty of some
other crime.
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
33
MEMORY AID
relationship to the principal, even if
such public officer acted with abuse
of his official functions.
REASON: Ties of blood or relationship
constitutes
a
more
powerful
incentive than the call of duty.
P.D. 1829 penalizes the act of any
person who knowingly or willfully
obstructs, impedes, frustrates or delays
the apprehension of suspects and the
investigation and prosecution of criminal
cases.
IN
CRIMINAL LAW
34
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
35
MEMORY AID
IN
CRIMINAL LAW
AN OFFENSE CAUSES
TWO CLASSES OF INJURIES:
SOCIAL INJURY
PERSONAL INJURY
Produced by the
disturbance
and
alarm which are the
outcome
of
the
offense.
Is sought to be
repaired
through
the imposition of
the
corresponding
penalty.
Is repaired
indemnity.
through
36
The
deprivations
of
rights
established in penal form by the civil
laws is illustrated in the case of
parents who are deprived of their
parental authority if found guilty of
the crime of corruption of their
minor children, in accordance with
Art. 332 of the Civil Code.
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
37
MEMORY AID
2. Accessory penalties are those
that are deemed included in the
principal penalties.
c) Based on subject matter
1. Corporal (death).
2. Deprivation
of
freedom
(reclusion, prision, arresto).
3. Restriction
of
freedom
(destierro).
4. Deprivation
of
rights
(disqualification and suspension).
5. Pecuniary (fine).
IN
CRIMINAL LAW
38
ART. 28 COMPUTATION OF
PENALTIES
1. When the offender is in prison the
duration of temporary penalties is
from the day on which the judgment
of conviction becomes final.
2. When the offender is not in prison
the duration of penalties consisting
in deprivation of liberty, is from the
day that the offender is placed at
the disposal of judicial authorities
for the enforcement of the penalty.
3. The duration of other penalties the
duration is from the day on which
the offender commences to serve his
sentence.
ART. 29 PERIOD OF PREVENTIVE
IMPRISONMENT DEDUCTED FROM TERM
OF IMPRISONMENT
Preventive imprisonment is the period
of detention undergone by an accused
where the crime with which he is
charged is non-bailable or, even if
bailable, he is unable to post the
requisite bail.
These
rules
on
preventive
imprisonment apply to all sentences
regardless of the duration thereof,
including the so-called perpetual
penalties as long as they involve
deprivation of liberty. It applies to
destierro.
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
39
MEMORY AID
voluntarily surrender after
commission of the crime.
the
IN
CRIMINAL LAW
Applies
only
to
crimes
against
chastity under the
RPC.
As to extinguishment of criminal
liability
Extinguishes
criminal liability.
When granted
Can be extended
only
after
conviction by final
judgment of the
accused.
Can
be
validly
granted only before
the institution of
the criminal action.
To whom granted
In
adultery
concubinage,
include
offenders.
and
must
both
40
May be absolute or
conditional
Cannot validly be
made subject to a
condition.
ART. 37 COSTS
Costs or costs of suit are the expenses
of litigation allowed and regulated by
the Rules of Court to be assessed against
or to be recovered by a party in
litigation.
THE FOLLOWING ARE INCLUDED IN
COSTS:
1. Fees, and
2. Indemnities, in the course of judicial
proceedings.
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
41
MEMORY AID
Court, not the penalty provided for
by the Code, which should be
considered in determining whether
or not subsidiary penalty should be
imposed.
NO SUBSIDIARY PENALTY SHALL BE
IMPOSED WHERE:
1. The penalty imposed is higher than
prisin correccional or 6 years,
Additional penalty for habitual
delinquency should be included
in determining whether or not
subsidiary penalty should be
imposed.
2. For non-payment of reparation or
indemnification,
3. For non-payment of costs, and
4. Where the penalty imposed is a fine
and another penalty without fixed
duration, like censure.
The rules on subsidiary penalty in
Art. 39 are applicable to crimes
punishable by special laws by force
of Art. 10 of the Code.
absolute
CRIMINAL LAW
IN
LIFE
IMPRISONMENT
Has
a
specific
duration of 20 years
and 1 day to 40 years
and
accessory
penalties.
Imposable
on
felonies punished by
the RPC.
Imposable on crimes
punishable by special
laws.
42
a) the
stages
of
execution
(consummated,
frustrated,
or
attempted); and
b) the degree of the criminal
participation
of
the
offender
(whether as principal, accomplice or
accessory).
2. BY PERIODS refers to the proper
period of the penalty which should be
imposed when aggravating or mitigating
circumstances attend the commission of
the crime.
ART. 47 CASES WHEREIN THE DEATH
PENALTY SHALL NOT BE IMPOSED
1. UNDER AGE. When the offender is
below 18 years of age at the time of
the commission of the crime.
2. OVER AGE. When the guilty person is
more than seventy (70) years of age.
3. NO COURT MAJORITY. When upon
appeal or automatic review of the
case by the Supreme Court, the vote
of eight members is not obtained for
the imposition of the death penalty.
penalty
is
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
43
MEMORY AID
IN
CRIMINAL LAW
2. COMPLEX
CRIME
PROPER
(delito complejo) an offense is a
necessary means for committing
the other.
REQUISITES:
1. That at least two
offenses are committed;
2. That one or some of the
offenses must be necessary
to commit the other;
3. That both or all of the
offenses must be punished
under the same statute.
NO COMPLEX CRIME IN THE FOLLOWING
CASES
1. In case of continuing crimes
2. When one offense is committed to
conceal the other.
3. When the other crime is an
indispensable part or an element of
the other offenses.
4. Where one of the offenses is
penalized by a special law.
44
b) When
the
law
specifically fixes a single
penalty for two or more
offenses committed.
c) When
the
offender
commits continuing crimes.
2. REAL OR MATERIAL PLURALITY DIFFERENT CRIMES in law, as well as
in the conscience of the offender;
the offender shall be PUNISHED FOR
EACH and every offense that he
committed.
CONTINUING CRIME is a single crime,
consisting of a series of acts, but all
arising from ONE CRIMINAL RESOLUTION;
length of time in the commission is
immaterial.
REAL OR
MATERIAL
PLURALITY
CONTINUED
CRIME
1. There is a series
of acts performed
by the offender
2.
Each
act
performed by the
offender constitutes
a separate crime,
each
act
is
generated
by
a
criminal impulse
1. There is a series
of acts performed
by the offender
2. The different acts
constitute only one
crime, all of the
acts performed arise
from one criminal
resolution
FRUSTRATED
ATTEMPTED
Prin
Accom
Acces
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
45
MEMORY AID
Section Two Rules for the application
of penalties with regard to the
mitigating
and
aggravating
circumstances,
and
habitual
delinquency
IN
CRIMINAL LAW
are
It is sufficient that
the accused on the
date of his trial,
shall have been
previously
convicted by final
judgment
of
another
crime
embraced in the
same title.
No period of time
between
the
former conviction
and
the
last
conviction.
As to their EFFECTS
An additional penalty
is also imposed
If not offset by a
mitigating
circumstance,
serves to increase
the penalty only to
the maximum
46
d)
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
47
MEMORY AID
IN
CRIMINAL LAW
I.
would
exceed
one
IF THE PENALTY IS
IMPOSED BY THE RPC:
1. The Maximum Term is that which
could be properly imposed under the
RPC, considering the aggravating and
mitigating circumstances.
2. The MinimumTerm is within the
range of the penalty one degree
lower than that prescribed by the
RPC,
without
considering
the
circumstances.
BUT when there is a privileged
mitigating circumstance, so that the
penalty has to be lowered by one
degree, the STARTING POINT for
determining the minimum term of
the indeterminate penalty is the
penalty next lower than that
prescribed by the Code for the
offense.
II. IF THE PENALTY IS IMPOSED BY
SPECIAL PENAL LAW
a) The Maximum Term must not
exceed the maximum term fixed by
said law.
b) The Minimum Term must not be
less than the minimum term
prescribed by the same.
48
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
49
MEMORY AID
3. The court may not pronounce
judgment of conviction but instead
SUSPEND all further proceedings if,
upon application of the youthful
offender, it finds that the best
interest of the public and that of the
offender will be served thereby.
4. The benefits of Article 192 of PD
603, as amended, providing for
suspension of sentence, shall NOT
APPLY TO (1) a youthful offender
who once enjoyed suspension of
sentence under its provisions, or (2)
one who is convicted of an offense
punishable by death or life
imprisonment.
5. The youthful offender shall be
RETURNED to the committing court
for pronouncement of judgment,
when the youthful offender, (1) has
been found incorrigible, or (2) has
willfully failed to comply with the
conditions of his rehabilitation
programs; or (3) when his continued
stay in the training institution would
be inadvisable.
6.
When the youthful offender has
reached the age of TWENTY-ONE
while in commitment, the court shall
determine whethera)
To DISMISS the case, if
the youthful offender has
behaved properly and has shown
his capability to be a useful
member of the community; or
b)
To
PRONOUNCE
the
judgment of conviction, if the
conditions mentioned are not
met.
7. In the latter case, the convicted
offender may apply for PROBATION.
In any case, the youthful offender
shall be credited in the service of his
sentence with the full time spent in
actual commitment and detention.
8. The final release of a youthful
offender, based on good conduct as
provided in Art. 196 shall not
obliterate his CIVIL LIABILITY for
damages.
9. A minor who is ALREDY AN ADULT at
the time of his conviction is not
entitled to a suspension of sentence.
PROBATION LAW OF 1976
IN
CRIMINAL LAW
B. APPLICATION
This shall apply to all offenders
except those entitled to benefits
under PD 603 and similar laws.
C. RULES
ON
GRANT
OF
PROBATION
1. After
having
convicted
and
sentenced a defendant, the trial
court MAY SUSPEND the execution of
the sentence, and place the
defendant on probation, upon
APPLICATION by the defendant
within the period for perfecting an
appeal.
2. Probation may be granted whether
the sentence imposed a term of
imprisonment or fine only.
3. NO application for probation shall be
entertained or granted if the
defendant
has PERFECTED AN
APPEAL from the judgment of
conviction.
4. Filing of application for probation
operates as a WAIVER OF THE RIGHT
TO APPEAL.
5. The application shall be filed with
the trial court, and the order
granting or denying probation shall
NOT BE APPEALABLE.
6. Accessory penalties are deemed
suspended
once
probation
is
granted.
D. POST-SENTENCE INVESTIGATION
The convict is not immediately placed on
probation. There shall be a prior
investigation by the probation officer
and a determination by the court.
E. CRITERIA FOR PLACING
OFFENDER ON PROBATION
AN
50
I.
PERIOD OF PROBATION
FOR HOW LONG MAY A CONVICT BE
PLACED ON PROBATION?
1. If the convict is sentenced to a term
of imprisonment of NOT more than
one year, the period of probation
shall not exceed 2 years.
2. In all other cases, if he is sentenced
to more than one year, said period
shall not exceed 6 years.
3. When the sentence imposes a fine
only and the offender is made to
serve subsidiary imprisonment. The
period of probation shall be twice
the total number of days of
subsidiary imprisonment.
J.
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
51
MEMORY AID
L.
1.
2.
3.
EFFECTS OF TERMINATION
OF PROBATION
Case is deemed terminated.
Restoration of all civil rights lost or
suspended.
Fully discharges liability for any fine
imposed.
IN
CRIMINAL LAW
of
any
is
1. A blanket pardon
to classes of persons
or communities who
52
individually by the
President
may be guilty of
political offenses.
2. Exercised when
the
person
is
already convicted
2. May be exercised
even before trial or
investigation is had
3. Merely looks
FORWARD
and
relieves
the
offender from the
consequences of an
offense of which he
has been convicted;
it does not work for
the restoration of
the rights to hold
public office, or
the
right
of
suffrage,
unless
such
rights
are
expressly restored
by
means
of
pardon.
4. Does not alter
the fact that the
accused
is
a
recidivist
as
it
produces only the
extinction of the
personal effects of
the penalty.
3. Looks BACKWARD
and abolishes and
puts into oblivion the
offense itself; it so
overlooks
and
obliterates
the
offense with which
he is charged that
the person released
by amnesty stands
before
the
law
precisely as though
he had committed no
offense.
5.
Does
not
extinguish
the
civil liability of
the offender
5.
Does
not
extinguish the civil
liability of the
offender
6. Being PRIVATE
ACT
by
the
President, must be
pleaded and proved
by
the
person
pardoned
6.
Being
a
Proclamation of the
Chief Executive with
the concurrence of
Congress; is a PUBLIC
ACT of which the
courts should take
judicial notice
OUTLINE
1. Period of prescription commences to
run from the date when the culprit
evaded the service of his sentence.
2. It is interrupted when the convict
a)
gives himself up,
b)
is captured,
c)
goes to a foreign country
with which
we have no
extradition treaty, or
d)
commits
any
crime
before the expiration of the
period of prescription.
ELEMENTS
1. That the penalty is imposed by final
judgment
2. That the convict evaded the service
of his sentence by escaping during
the term of his sentence
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
53
MEMORY AID
3. The convict who escape from prison
has not given himself up, or been
captured, or gone to a foreign
country
4. That the penalty has prescribed
because of the lapse of time from
the date of the evasion of service of
the sentence by the convict.
Chapter Two: Partial Extinction of
Criminal Liability (Arts. 94-99)
ART. 94. PARTIAL EXTINCTION OF
CRIMINAL LIABILITY
CRIMINAL LIABILITY IS PARTIALLY
EXTINGUISHED:
1. By CONDITIONAL PARDON;
2. By COMMUTATION OF SERVICE
3. For GOOD CONDUCT ALLOWANCES
which the culprit may earn while he
is serving sentence;
4. By PAROLE
a. Parole is the suspension of the
sentence of a convict, after
serving the minimum term of
the
indeterminate
penalty,
without being granted a pardon,
prescribing the terms upon which
the sentence shall be suspended
5.
Code
2. For violation of the
conditional
pardon,
the convict may be
ordered re-arrested or
re-incarcerated by the
Chief Executive, or
may be PROSECUTED
under Art. 159 of the
Code
IN
CRIMINAL LAW
provision
of
the
Indeterminate
Sentence Law
2. For violation of the
terms of the parole,
the convict CANNOT
BE
PROSECUTED
UNDER ART. 159 OF
THE RPC, he can be
re-arrested and reincarcerated to serve
the unserved portion
of his original penalty.
54
Liability
AND
SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
55
MEMORY AID
IN
CRIMINAL LAW