Professional Documents
Culture Documents
J Med Philos-1989-Coulson-109-46
J Med Philos-1989-Coulson-109-46
SPIRO
Key Words: mental models, knowledge representation, reductionism, myocardium, heart failure, physiology.
110
Richard L. Coulson et ah
111
100-
F
0
R
C
20-]
E
0-
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
chemically with actin active sites (Potter and Gergely, 1975) over
this range of length is supported by experimental observations
over the past thirty years (Martinosi, 1984; Pollack, 1983; Potter
and Gergely, 1975). Similarly, the anatomical evidence supports
an explanation for the decline in force on the right hand side of
p
E
R 80C
E
N
T
60H
M
A
X
I
M 40A
L
112
100p
E
R
C
E
N
T
80-1
F
0
R
C
E
20-
010
I.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
60-j
M
A
X
I
M 40A
L
113
114
Frank-Starling Relationship
Research of the past twenty years (Ebashi et al., 1969; Potter and
Gergely, 1975; Weber and Murray, 1973) has begun to elucidate
mechanisms of variable activation involving the C a ^ ion
(Martinosi, 1984), the calcium ATPase pump (Martinosi, 1984),
and the troponin-tropomyosin system of the actin filament
(Ebashi et al., 1969; Weber and Murray, 1973) which may explain
both the Frank-Starling relationship of the heart (Coulson, 1982)
and the ascending limb of the length-tension relationship in
physiological terms (Jewell, 1977).
Muscle Hypertrophy
115
100/
80-
/
/
60-
;
\
/
2 *
,'
25 L/MIN
_ ^ _
'5 L/MIN
-"
0"
^
"
1.5
"
2.0
2.5
' I
3.0
3.5
' I
4.0
40-
116
Richard L. Coulson et ah
117
Okay, discuss factors which cause the muscle contraction to be inadequate (in
heart failure). Okay, this takes me back to the Frank-Starling mechanism,
where there's a volume overload on the heart, and this, urn, leads to, um, the
muscle cell spindles to be spread apart so there's very little overlap between
the actin and the myosin, and, ah, the way I conceptualize this is with the
cross fibres as sort of like little guys rowing, or else people pulling on a tug of
rope, and, ah, with less overlap they're able to, ah, develop less tension, and
the entire muscle, muscle fibre itself, the heart is able to, is not able to do its
job as effectively... I like to think of the Frank-Starling as falling over the edge
of where, with, as the further the muscle cell gets stretched, the less it's able to
do its job effectively... I use the sort of the, conceptualize the number of
rowers or people pulling on a tug of rope to explain that with increasing
stretching of each cell they are less able to pull and shorten. And also, in the
Frank-Starling mechanism, where it's gone over the edge of where more
lengthening of the cell doesn't help with tension.
118
because of the law of LaPlace, more energy has to be, more force has to be
generated, ah, to achieve the same wall tension. So that there are two reasons
why a certain degree of dilation of the, of the ventricle is, is functional and
achieves increased cardiac output, but there is a point reached beyond which,
ah, function actually declines, and this is what is referred to as a failing
ventricle where cardiac output is falling.
Dilatation of the heart is also a factor that can decrease cardiac efficiency. The
force of contraction of a muscle (including cardiac muscle) depends on the
initial length of the muscle sarcomeres. When the sarcomere is initially
stretched, this is associated with a more forceful contraction. The optimum
sarcomere length is 2.2 pm. At this length the overlapping between the actin
and myosin filaments are ideally situated to allow the cross-bridges between
them to pull the actin filaments inward during contraction. When the
sarcomeres stretch beyond this point, the actin and myosin filaments do not
overlap so much and the cross-bridges cannot pull the actin filaments inward
adequately. As a result, the force of muscle contraction decreases. This is the
structural basis for Starling's law of muscle contraction.
119
If you stretch any muscle excessively it's not going to be able to contract
because you've pulled the actin and myosin completely apart, so that it can't
form any cross-bridges and it can't contract, or, if you have a muscle that's too
contracted to begin with, it can't contract anymore because the actin and
myosin are pushed up against each other already, and there's no room for
them to slide any further. (Medical student discussing the length-tension
relationship).
2. The isolated cardiac muscle exhibits a length-tension relationship similar in all respects to the stylized skeletal muscle lengthtension relationship.
Direct statements of this correspondence are generally not
made; the correspondence probably has the status of a tacit
presupposition, as evidenced by the following statement by a
second year medical student, who describes the classical skeletal
muscle length-tension relationship in his discussion of the cardiac
function curve (also see the earlier textbook account, which more
overtly equates the two L-T curves in its parenthetical statement):
A number of salient aspects characterize this account of myocardial failure by a Mechanical Ultrastructural Mechanism (MUM); in
order to be tenable, several conceptual components appear to be
inherent in this "understanding" of the processes involved. These
components are listed together with quotes from subjects which
indicate their belief in each. (All quotes are from different subjects).
1. The entire length-tension relationship, both descending and
ascending limbs, has its functional basis in the highly mechanical
Sliding Filament Theory of contraction. On the descending limb,
declining forces are generated because of disengagement through
stretching of actin and myosin filaments. Optimal forces are
generalized at the plateau lengths of the relationship because of
optimal engagement. Suboptimal forces arise on the ascending
limb, because actin and myosin filaments are "smashed up"
against each other.
120
121
122
123
124
The ascending limb of the length-tension relationship is inappropriately mapped onto the Frank-Starling or cardiac function
relationship. This belies the fact that because cardiac muscle is
submaximally (twitch) activated, a large range of forces are
possible through variable activation at almost any given sarcomere length. The major part of the cardiac function curve occurs
at sarcomere lengths which correspond to the plateau (2.0 to 2.3
\im) and to that very small fraction of the descending limb of the
maximally activated skeletal length-tension relationship (from 2.3
to 2.5 pm) which can be achieved by cardiac sarcomeres. Because
of variable activation, even at sarcomere lengths between 2.3 and
2.5 |im the force generated by cardiac muscle rises rather than
falls.
125
126
In this section and the next, we provide a scenario for the development of the misconception of the basis of heart failure (the MUM)
and for the maintenance of this misconception. In developing this
account, we are guided by what appear to be two basic tenets of
the misconception: (i) an in vitro, skeletal phenomenon (the L-T) is
ultimately mapped in the misconception to an in vivo, cardiac one
(cardiac failure). These two phenomena, one skeletal and created
in the laboratory and the other cardiac and occurring in a natural
context, are two "anchor points7' of the overall web of misconception and must be connected in any account; (ii) within this mapping, physiological activational properties and morphological
aspects of compensatory hypertrophy in cardiac muscle are
relatively neglected.
The four misconceptions given earlier in the paper (see The
Main Components of the Misconception) appear to be the links
which tie together the two anchor points and provide for the
neglect of activation and the effects of hypertrophic adaptation.
Briefly recapitulating, these major contributors to the overall
misconception are: 1) that the length-tension (L-T) relationship in
skeletal muscle is accounted for exclusively by anatomical factors
(the Sliding Filament Theory); 2) that the L-T relationship of the
cardiac muscle cell is the same as that for skeletal muscle; 3) that
the Frank-Starling relationship is the collective counterpart of the
L-T relationship for individual cardiac cells; and 4) that cardiac
failure is attributed to cardiac cells being collectively stretched to
the descending limb of the L-T curve. We now illustrate the
possible role of various forms of the Reductive Bias within each of
the Four Misconceptions
First Misconception: The Whole Length-Tension Curve has an Anatomical Basis.
A. When students (and others) discuss the "length-tension
relationship", they most likely mean the L-T relationship for
isolated skeletal muscle. There are several reasons why this
particular L-T relationship should have special status (as compared to other length-tension curves). First, it is a classic teaching
example and most students are exposed to it. Second, it was the
first L-T relationship demonstrated and the only one for nearly 60
}
|
127
128
to address multidimensional phenomena by investigating relationships among subsets of the operative variables. The strategy is to
build from lower dimensionality to an ultimate understanding of
phenomena in their full dimensionality. The attribution of the
entire length-tension dynamic to length, colored as it is by ignoring the variable nature of activation (i.e., controlling it at one of its
values), suggests that this reassembly often does not occur.
C. Once the activational basis for the ascending limb of the L-T
was recognized, why was it the anatomical influence that was
overextended to the entire relationship rather than the activational
component? A likely reason is that the anatomical account is
much easier to teach and learn than the biochemical physiological
components, for a number of reasons. First, the anatomically
based Sliding Filament Theory is less complicated. It involves only
a few key elements (e.g., invariant filament lengths; shortening
occurs by relative filament translation) and, especially when
misinterpreted, is linear - the more potential binding sites the
more tension produced. In contrast, the process of activation
involves numerous interacting subcellular components and
processes (e.g., Ca4* release sites, binding proteins, ion pumps)
and the effects are nonuniform (e.g., activation works qualitatively
differently at different levels of anatomical extension). Second, as
we have seen, neat, easily envisioned, and cognitively productive
analogies are readily available to aid anatomical understanding
(for example, rowing crews and tug-of-war). Finally, details of the
physiological activational accounts are less well understood and
are more controversial in their particulars. Options and controversy are not as easy to handle in teaching and are not conducive to elegant structuring by the learner. (Anecdotal lore is
widespread among medical school teachers to the effect that
medical school students dislike competing or controversial
accounts).
Reductive Bias 3 (Teach toward the simple). If more than one concept is
involved in understanding a process, the harder concepts (e.g., those that are
non-mechanical, non-linear, multidimensionally interacting, or less well
129
established) are neglected. Either they are not taught, or if taught, they are
presented cursorily, with less vigorous justification and without full modeling.
K
/
130
Second Misconception: The Length-Tension Relationship for Cardiac Muscle is the Same as for Skeletal Muscle.
B. Evidence does now exist that skeletal and (a type of) cardiac
muscle produce similar but not identical length-tension relationships. The demonstration of a length-tension relationship for
cardiac muscle comparable to that of skeletal muscle bolsters what
had previously been an unsupported step in the chain of misconceptions. This superficial support also has the negative effect of
reinforcing other missteps in the argument that depend on cardiac
muscle being like skeletal muscle (see Reductive Bias 5). If some
aspects of cardiac muscle function are like those for skeletal
muscle (e.g., potential for the generation of tension increases [to a
point] as function of length, and there are anatomical accounts for
parts of both curves), then it is easier to transport other attributes
from the skeletal to the cardiac muscle domains. These
overextensions might include overattributions of activational
similarity, e.g., that cardiac, like skeletal muscle, functions at full
activation.
Reductive Bias 7 (Extension of attributes). If A is like B with regard to X, then A
will be like B with regard to Y, Z, and so on.
A. The (overgeneralized) anatomical account of the lengthtension relationship in skeletal muscle is ultimately transported to
cardiac muscle. Prior to 1959 there was not even evidence that
skeletal and cardiac cells generated comparable maximally
activated length-tension curves. When the overextension in
reasoning was made prior to this time, it was probably supported
by a tacit presupposition that "all muscles are alike".
131
the descending limb for cardiac muscle would be like that for
skeletal muscle if there were a descending limb for cardiac muscle
- which there isn't.
'
W
L
j5
f.
132
133
y
I
I
j
&
domain could also be made and would be most helpful in fostering a more appropriate understanding of heart failure. However,
it is just this correspondence that appears to be underutilized in
favor of a mechanical, anatomical account. This is perhaps not
surprising, since the activational component of L-T is often
systematically controlled out (held at maximal value) in laboratory
demonstrations (see earlier discussions). Students and others may
not think to represent an analogue of activation in the F-S domain,
because they do not recognize that it exists in the base (L-T)
domain.
134
Richard L. Coulson et ah
A second contributor to overextension of in vitro muscle function to in vivo heart function may involve a chain of analogies. The
first step involves the correspondence between isolated and intact
(in vivo) skeletal muscle. Whole skeletal muscle does better reflect
individual L-T characteristics, largely because skeletal muscle
naturally functions at maximal activation. It is another small step
from isolated skeletal muscle to cardiac papillary muscle which
resembles skeletal muscle in some, but not other, pertinent ways.
Then, since isolated and collective skeletal muscle operation are
similar, and since isolated papillary muscle is like isolated skeletal
muscle in some ways, it is only another small step to generalize
from papillary muscle to more general cardiac muscle. Like the
parlor game of "Russian Scandal", each analogical step introduces
only relatively small losses in correspondence, but the loss across
the whole chain is great.
So, if the entire skeletal length-tension curve has an anatomical
basis in Sliding Filament Theory, the cardiac L-T curve is the same
as that for skeletal fibre, and the Frank-Starling cardiac function
relationship is just a generalized restatement of the L-T relationship, then it would follow that heart failure has an anatomical
basis in an "overstretch" of its individual sarcomeres.
135
136
First, ideas embedded within the misconception bolster and feed back
on each other in complicated ways. One way is global, through the
ways. For example, the belief that cardiac muscle is like skeletal
muscle makes it easier to believe that cardiac muscle has a descending limb within its length-tension curve. In turn, the neglect
of activational factors within muscle function leaves an anatomical
mechanism as the only plausible means for providing an account
for cardiac failure. Within a mechanical account, the most
plausible way to account for loss of "strength" in a muscle is
through disinterdigitation of its filaments. This further disposes
one toward believing that a descending limb exists for cardiac
muscle. Thus multiply bolstered, belief in the existence of a (nonexistent) cardiac descending limb, in turn, is a keystone in the
entire Mechanical Ultrastructural Mechanism account of heart
failure.
Another example is in the constellation of ideas surrounding
what is, in essence, the belief that the Frank-Starling relationship
(at least the "healthy part" and, hence, normal heart function) has
its basis in the ascending limb of the length-tension curve. This
belief appears to be supported through a web of reciprocating
confluences. Because the cardiac L-T has a left-side similar to that
of the skeletal L-T, it is easy to think that the Frank-Starling
relationship is a manifestation of the length-tension relationship,
because in both situations "longer is stronger"; that is, as expressed by many of our subjects, "up to a point" greater muscle
size produces more "force". Also, since anatomy explains well the
descending limb and top of the skeletal L-T relationship, it is easy
to believe that it explains the ascending limb. If one thinks that
anatomy explains the left side, then activational explanations for
the L-T are not needed anywhere. Since the Frank-Starling relationship looks like a left-side L-T relationship, it is easy to believe it is
one. If activational explanations for the left side of the L-T are not
needed, then they are not needed for the Frank-Starling relationship. Further, the microstructural differences in sarcomere lengths
achievable in both situations (L-T and F-S) are opaque and, hence,
are susceptible to mental construal to support belief. The overall
result of this complex pattern of reciprocation is a belief that
normal heart function, as reflected in the Frank-Starling relationship, is a matter of creeping down (or up) the left side of the
length-tension curve; in fact, most of the Frank-Starling
phenomenon occurs at sarcomere lengths on and near the plateau.
If it is believed that normal heart function is a matter of traversing
the left side of the L-T, then it is a simple logical jump to the MUM
137
138
account, that is, that failure is a matter of "falling over the top", to
a descending limb.
A second reason why our "syllogistic" exposition is an oversimplified
portrayal is that the steps of reasoning among the misconceptions are
139
Another example pertains to Reduction of Simultaneously Considered Dimensions (RB2), as well as to aspects of RB3, Teach
Toward the Simple. These biases are manifest in two-dimensional
textbook presentations of the L-T curve (as opposed to multidimensional surfaces) with activation held at one value, in similar
two-dimensional presentations of the Frank-Starling relationship
with the contractile dimension not represented, and in research
demonstrations of both of these phenomena.
That the reductive biases apply in many places and reinforce
each other is an indication that they reflect a general way of
thinking. The set of reductions we have enumerated fall into four
discernible groups (with, of course, some overlap), all related to
some aspect of simplifications:
140
Richard L. Coulson et ah
141
All that we have said may elicit agreement, yet draw the response,
"But what can be done about it?" We believe that there are directions to take which may offer help, and that in any case there is
something that should surely be done.
There has been a revolution in cognitive and instructional
theory in the last ten years (Glaser, 1978, 1982; Spiro et ah, 1980).
Much of it has been spurred by the recognition that useful approaches to a psychology of cognition and instruction must deal
with the fuller complexities of human thinking and subject
matters as they exist in substantial domains of practice and
142
NOTE
* This research was supported by a grant from the Josiah Macy, Jrv Foundation,
Grant No. B8S2001. The paper does not necessarily reflect the views of the
Foundation.
REFERENCES
Abelson, R. P., Aronson, E., McGuire, W. J., Newcomb, T. M, Rosenberg, M. J.,
and Tannenbaum, P. H.: 1968, Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Source Book,
143
Champagne, A. B., Klopfer, L. E., and Gunstone, R. F.: 1982, 'Cognitive research
and the design of science instruction', Educational Psychology 17,31^53.
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., and Glaser, R.: 1981, 'Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices', Cognitive Science 5,121-152.
Clancey, W. J.: 1984, Teaching classification problem solving', in Proceedings of
the Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society [abstract], Boulder:
Fabiato, A., and Fabiato, F.: 1975, 'Dependence of the contractile activation of
skinned cardiac cells on the sarcomere length', Nature 256,54-^56.
Feltovich, P. J., Johnson, P. E., Moller, J. H., and Swanson, D. B.: 1984, 'LCS: The
role and development of medical knowledge in diagnostic expertise', in W. J.
Clancey and E. H. Shortliffe (eds.), Readings in Medical Artificial Intelligence: The
F. A. Brockhaus, Leipzig.
Bashkar, R., and Simon, H. A.: 1977, 'Problem solving in sematically rich
domains: an example from engineering thermodynamics', Cognitive Science 1,
193-215.
Blix, M.: 1892, 'Die lange and die spannung des muskels', Skandinavisches Archiv
144
Frank, O.: 1895, 'Zur dynamik des herzmuskels', Zeitschrift fuer Biologie 32,
370-477.
[
Gentner, D.: 1983, 'Structure mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy7, V
Cognitive Science 7,155-170.
Gibbs, C. and Loiselle, D.: 1978, "The energy output of tetanized cardiac muscle:
species differences', Pflugers Archiv 373,31-38.
Glaser, R.: 1978, Advances in Instructional Psychology, Vol. 1, L. Erlbaum As-
i
i
Holton, G.: 1973, Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought: Kepler to Einstein, Harvard
jj
j
J
Huxley, A. F. and Hanson, J.: 1954, 'Changes in the cross striations of muscle
i
during contraction and stretch and their ultrastructural interpretation', Nature I
173,973-976.
T
{f
1\
145
146
Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J., and Anderson, D. K.: 1988, 'Cognitive
flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains',
in Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
Weber, A., and Murray, J. M.: 1973, 'Molecular control mechanisms in muscle
contraction', Physiology Review 53,612-673.
Wimsatt, W. C: 1980, 'Reductionistic research strategies and their biases in the
units of selection controversy', in T. Nickles (ed.), Scientific Discovery: Case
Studies, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 213-259.
Winegrad, S.: 1982, 'Calcium release from cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum',
Annual Review Physiology 44,451462.
Wiser, M. and Carey, S.: 1983, 'When heat and temperature were one', in D.
Gentner and A. L. Stevens (eds.), Mental Models, L. Erlbaum Associates,
Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 267-297.