S & S Law Firm

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10

CASE ANALYSIS

S & S LAW FIRM

GROUP 11
SUSAN BANGERA
SUMMIYA SAIFY
SURBHI AGARWAL
SONAM SHARMA
SAUMYA SAURABH
SIDDHARTH KAUSHIK
CASE OVERVIEW
• S & S Law firm, Head Office at Delhi
• Sinha , to head the Bangalore branch
• Witnessed high attrition rate, Sinha to find
out the reasons
• Salary not a problem since firm’s salary
structure is competitive



CASE OVERVIEW CONTD.
• Sinha meets four Senior Managers and
takes their recommendations
• Gowda and Krishna (senior managers)
provide their feedback



ISSUES
• High Attrition Rate
• Company lacks HR Department
• Idea of HR Dept rejected by the Top
Management
• Dominance of the HO- Centralised
Organizational Structure
REASONS FOR HIGH
ATTRITION RATE
• Younger Staff lacks dedication and fails to
appreciate career opportunities
• Complaints about the lack of meaningful
feedback on their performance
• Lack of sponsor in the Organization to
assist with their development
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR
RETENTION
• Conducting Retention Management
Programs
üProper Performance Feedback
üMentoring System-Impetus on Career
Planning
üProvide Employee Benefit Schemes
NEED FOR AN HR
DEPARTMENT
• HR Planning Team-Research Team
• Cheer Leader Role
• Fire Fighter Role
• Trouble Shooter Role
• Police Role
• Employee advocate/Corporate conscience
role
• Consultant role


CONVINCING TOP LEVEL
MANAGEMENT

• Retention is better than Recruitment


• Retention builds Loyalty
• Company image


ORGANIZATIONAL
STRUCTURE

• Decentralization - Reduced
dominance of Delhi HO
• Forming SBU
• Departmental Customization




 THANK YOU

You might also like