Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Disqualification of Judge: Family Connection to Party or Counsel Citing CJA Ethics Opinions - California Judges Benchguide Judicial Council of California - California Judges Association Judicial Ethics - Supreme Court of California Tani G Cantil-Sakauye - Martin Hoshino Judicial Council - Judge Recusal-Disqualification - Conflict of Interest Disclosure
Disqualification of Judge: Family Connection to Party or Counsel Citing CJA Ethics Opinions - California Judges Benchguide Judicial Council of California - California Judges Association Judicial Ethics - Supreme Court of California Tani G Cantil-Sakauye - Martin Hoshino Judicial Council - Judge Recusal-Disqualification - Conflict of Interest Disclosure
Disqualification of Judge: Family Connection to Party or Counsel Citing CJA Ethics Opinions - California Judges Benchguide Judicial Council of California - California Judges Association Judicial Ethics - Supreme Court of California Tani G Cantil-Sakauye - Martin Hoshino Judicial Council - Judge Recusal-Disqualification - Conflict of Interest Disclosure
Benchguide 2
DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE
[REVISED 2010]
See also In re Morelli (1970) 11 CA3d 819, 844 n17, 91 CR 72, for a
collection of sufficient showings of bias.
Implied bias. Under CCP 170.1(a)(6), bias may be implied from a
connection between a party and a judge that is not a statutory ground for
disqualification under CCP 170.1. For example, CJA Ethics Opinion 19
217
Disqualification of Judge
2.19
states that a judge may not hear any case involving a co-employee of a
former associate who had recently performed legal services for the judge.
JUDICIAL TIP: A judge should be careful not to make unnecessary comments or statements about a case or the litigants if there
are unresolved issues, evidence is still to be received, or there is a
possibility of a retrial or an appeal. Even after these issues are
resolved, a judge should avoid unnecessary comments about a
case.
Double jeopardy. In a criminal or juvenile delinquency case, when a
judge disqualifies himself or herself under CCP 170.1(a)(6), thus
compelling a mistrial of the case, double jeopardy does not bar a retrial of
th d f d t I
C l V (1997) 57 CA4th 522 525 528 67 CR2d