Case study for AGC.
Summary:
"Armour Garments Company (AGC) was a manufacturer of high quality undershirts in the Philippines established on 1954. For ten years, it has been a flourishing enterprise having only 25 workers at its onset and accumulating up to 250 workers by the year 1967. The bulk of its products were sold to wholesalers in Divisoria and in turn are distributed all over the country. In the mid 60’s, more undershirt factories opened and threatened the market share of AGC but the company was quite confident with its reputation as a high quality manufacturer of undershirts. Then in 1970, the fashion trend of the country change as it is wont to do. It became “unfashionable” to wear undershirts and this furthered the declining sales of AGC.
The company decided to introduce a new brand, “Blossom”, which was of the same quality with its “Armor” and “Marca Troca” brands but are cheaper. Unfortunately “Blossom” was undermining the sales of its sister brands so the company decided to discontinue its production. With the failure of the marketability of its traditional products, AGC decided to venture into ready-to-wear business. They introduced a polo shirt line, jeans and printed shirts but the results were unfavorable."
Case study for AGC.
Summary:
"Armour Garments Company (AGC) was a manufacturer of high quality undershirts in the Philippines established on 1954. For ten years, it has been a flourishing enterprise having only 25 workers at its onset and accumulating up to 250 workers by the year 1967. The bulk of its products were sold to wholesalers in Divisoria and in turn are distributed all over the country. In the mid 60’s, more undershirt factories opened and threatened the market share of AGC but the company was quite confident with its reputation as a high quality manufacturer of undershirts. Then in 1970, the fashion trend of the country change as it is wont to do. It became “unfashionable” to wear undershirts and this furthered the declining sales of AGC.
The company decided to introduce a new brand, “Blossom”, which was of the same quality with its “Armor” and “Marca Troca” brands but are cheaper. Unfortunately “Blossom” was undermining the sales of its sister brands so the company decided to discontinue its production. With the failure of the marketability of its traditional products, AGC decided to venture into ready-to-wear business. They introduced a polo shirt line, jeans and printed shirts but the results were unfavorable."
Case study for AGC.
Summary:
"Armour Garments Company (AGC) was a manufacturer of high quality undershirts in the Philippines established on 1954. For ten years, it has been a flourishing enterprise having only 25 workers at its onset and accumulating up to 250 workers by the year 1967. The bulk of its products were sold to wholesalers in Divisoria and in turn are distributed all over the country. In the mid 60’s, more undershirt factories opened and threatened the market share of AGC but the company was quite confident with its reputation as a high quality manufacturer of undershirts. Then in 1970, the fashion trend of the country change as it is wont to do. It became “unfashionable” to wear undershirts and this furthered the declining sales of AGC.
The company decided to introduce a new brand, “Blossom”, which was of the same quality with its “Armor” and “Marca Troca” brands but are cheaper. Unfortunately “Blossom” was undermining the sales of its sister brands so the company decided to discontinue its production. With the failure of the marketability of its traditional products, AGC decided to venture into ready-to-wear business. They introduced a polo shirt line, jeans and printed shirts but the results were unfavorable."
Armour Garments Company (AGC) was a manufacturer of high quality undershirts in the Philippines established on 1954. For ten years, it has been a flourishing enterprise having only 25 workers at its onset and accumulating up to 250 workers by the year 1967. The bulk of its products were sold to wholesalers in Divisoria and in turn are distributed all over the country. In the mid 60s, more undershirt factories opened and threatened the market share of AGC but the company was quite confident with its reputation as a high quality manufacturer of undershirts. Then in 1970, the fashion trend of the country change as it is wont to do. It became unfashionable to wear undershirts and this furthered the declining sales of AGC. The company decided to introduce a new brand, Blossom, which was of the same quality with its Armor and Marca Troca brands but are cheaper. Unfortunately Blossom was undermining the sales of its sister brands so the company decided to discontinue its production. With the failure of the marketability of its traditional products, AGC decided to venture into ready-to-wear business. They introduced a polo shirt line, jeans and printed shirts but the results were unfavorable.
II.
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
How can the Armor Garments Company reduce its losses and cope with the ever increasing competitiveness of its market?
III.
STATEMENT OF THE OBJECTIVES
1. Encourage middlemen, like the Divisoria wholesalers, to be loyal to the Armor Garment Companys products. 2. To be able to compete with the emerging competition and gain profit.
IV.
ALTERNATIVE COURSE OF ACTION
First solution is to partner up with the raw materials suppliers and to
give longer credit terms and other benefits to the middlemen. One advantage of is the product costs will decrease. Also, more middlemen will be loyal to the products and they could also advertise it. But, the market is still limited and there are no improvement in the products thus the problem of the market trend is not addressed. Additionally, competitors might copy this strategy and they might also offer longer credit terms. Another solution is to set new styles and to create products for women. With the new styles and merchandise for women, there will be more potential customers. Also, as women are more interested in clothes, there are greater chances that there will be more buyers as with the male only products. The disadvantage of this is that the company might have difficulties with the different production process for womens clothes. Also, womens taste in clothes are more fickle. This can be an obstacle for the companys designers as they will have to update their designs frequently. Another option is to venture into the high end market and supply some celebrities with the clothing line for endorsements. One advantage is the high exposure of the products and the big influence of the celebrities to the fashion trends of the public. Also, AGC could have more profit since high end products could have higher revenues. But, there will be major changes to the design and manufacturing process. Also, having endorsers will be costly and there is no assurance that the celebrities influence is great enough to persuade consumers to buy the products.
V.
RECOMMENDATION AND CONCLUSION
The optimum option is the second alternative. There will be major
changes but the benefits far outweigh the risks. The first alternative just addresses one face of the issue while the last alternative is more risky and more costly with very high probability of failure. The AGC could slowly develop their designs and introduce it to the market. The losses theyve incurred will gradually be lessened with the new product offerings. They must let go of their sentimentality towards their traditional products to be able to move forward and to contend with the aggressive competitors. With these changes, the company will be better suited to compete in the market. The managers of AGC must be willing to lead the transformation of the enterprise.