Td OOO
he SPEAK Cam
Speak for the voicelessAs our tenth year of campaigning
against animal testing at Oxford
University draws to a close we
would like to recognise the help of
everyone who has supported us in
so many ways over that decade
Thank you to those who have
supported SPEAK financially, either
by collections, donations or annual
subscriptions, some of whom have
been with us from the very
beginning.
Thank you to those who buy and
wear our T shirts and Hoodies
thereby spreading our message.
Thank you to all those who have
joined us on demonstrations and
marches over the years, sometimes
travelling long distances to do so.
Thank you to those who regularly
stand outside the laboratory for
Thursday demos on South Parks
Road in all weathers
Finally a big thank you to
everyone who has worked behind
the scones to make the SPEAK
campaign both effective and
enduring.
A MESSAGE FROM SPEAK
PNRM Ey enol
Cereus
SOMEONE NOT SOMETHING
See oe os Ome
RATS AND MICE
Pee Re
NEW TECHNOLOGY
eee au Re Wu
ELECTION 2015
JOIN SPEAK
: rd)
CRTC ICY | eel
at Oxford University
Piiaa Secemeeest bil. enema eines
Itis always good to see and talk to our many supporters, and if
any of you have any views to share or ideas for articles and
features suitable for the magazine we will always be pleased
to give them consideration.Sg eye ag
ACCES eee eed
approached by a gentleman asking whether
ee ee rae
ibut she told him that her friend who was
eyes oe ule Le)
Evelers Mane ar tke ae
He dectined her offer of help, muttering that animals inside
eee ego
BN ari
eer ice ee eS ae
monkeys, which involved having their heads cut open and
electrodes inserted into their brains, a practice that was first
Ce ee ee hee
eres ne ei ets
Ce en ree eu
Cn emia tner ute e)
documentary Monkeys, Rats and Me, the details of which are
eae
He mumbled very quietly ~"Yes but what about all the
prisoners being tortured in Syria?” Sho vehemently replied
gn Ree Ta
WRONG, and amazingly he agreed with her.
Reema Ne Rec Pacer a ecard
past every week, but on this occasion he felt compelled to,
walk by and personally offer his congratulations and say “well
Cee yun eee Ree
ee re Mase ee
€on how to get rd of rats from his property. He was advised to
nee aces Ee
ete oe ances
ee ener a ee a
eines
Finally, a woman approached the SPEAK stall asking why
campaigners were not standing outside McDonalds or K.F.C.
protesting against intensive farming, The response was that it
Ree een od
Cee eR eee RC
Cee rea nese ee co
ee een
ee hee ene ered
eee Ae mE a ies
Day's
i
While in Gloucestershire, trying to stop the senseless,
feet ee eee ea)
approached by a person saying, “I know you, don't I?" They
eee ance ct
De ees
Ree neg esse tl
Rec ese cou Teck
bystanders as the noisy but peaceful march passed by. They
were handed a leaflet, which was to change their lives forever.
ee eae oot ah ate
inflicted on laboratory animals and the pictures on posters had
Dee ee tens
eee
Sea em eee eg
Coc te eed
promised that very soon they would join protesters on their
‘Thursday demos in Oxford, which is of course where their
Journey fighting for the animals had begun
Ce a ac ae ULE
ac EenOMEON
SOMETH
E NOT
THE FIGHT TO GAIN LEGAL RIGHTS FOR NON-HUMANS
The question of non-human rights
has been the subject of
philosophical debate for decades
but has yet to make serious
political and legal headway here
inthe UK.
While the animal rights movement has
made huge strides in exposing animal
abuse within institutions such as Oxford
University, and the evidence mounts for
non-human awareness, the law
remains intractable. Nothing has
changed for non-humans since the first
animal welfare laws were drawn up in
the nineteenth century, and the arcane
UK legal system denies them any
recognition beyond their utility for
human use.
Recent evidence has demonstrated that,
beings as diverse as chimpanzees,
birds, rodents, dogs, octopi and many
more are not only sentient but in many
cases self-aware, and yet all of the
above continue to be abused inside
institutions, without any legal
consideration for their rich emotional
lives. Popular wildlife and animal
documentaries now attribute emotions
previously seen as the preserve of
humans, such as love, grief, sorrow and
fear, to many non-humans. Why,
therefore, as 4 society, are we not
seeking justice over prejudice for other
emotionally developed individuals?
Across the Atlantic, in the United
States, a group of lawyers and other
Interested professionals, under thebanner of the Nonhuman Rights Project,
(NhRP), are on the point of breaching
the barrier that has kept animals in a
legal limbo for centuries. On 8 October
2014 the founder of the NnRP, lawyer
Steven Wise, argued in court on behalf
of Tommy, a 29-year-old former circus
chimp. At its core, this case revolves
around Tommy's rights not to be held
against his will or to suffer physical and
‘mental torture, with the argument
focusing on his autonomy. As we write
this, the judges in this case are stil
considering the arguments, with the
ramifications for Tommy and other non-
humans being huge, should the
‘outcome be positive. The NhRP has
further cases pending for other captive
non-human.
Here in the UK, the birthplace of the
animal rights movement, surely the time
has come for our antiquated animal
welfare laws to be swept away and
replaced with those that actually reflect
the obvious evidence in support of non-
human emotion and awareness? When
even those who commit atrocities
against non-humans, such as some of
the signatories of the 2013 Cambridge
Declaration on Consciousness, state
that these individuals have the capacity
to experience similar emotional states
to humans, how can we as a society
deny them the rights they so clearly
deserve? While the political and legal
systems have become increasingly
hostile towards the animals rights
movement in the UK, nevertheless itis
ONLY the animal rights movement that
ccan take the next historic step forward
for non-human.
The Animal Rights Legal Centre
(ARLC) Is @ new venture that has been
established to help realise the goal of
legal rights for non-humans. We aim to
bring together those who have worked
tirelessly to get animal rights
recognised with those wno can act as
architects for legal change. It is our
hope to open the eyes of the public to
the seriously prejudicial nature of the
law regarding non-humans. We are
currently engaged in supporting an
academic project examining animal
rights end the law. We have various
other innovative projects in the planning
stages, for which we hope to gain
support from the animal rights
community. The ARLC is not separate
from the grass-roots movement but is
made up of seasoned campaigners
who wish to ensure that the door to
non-human rights, which is now being
knocked on around the word, is finally
forced open.
Their most basic and fundamental
interests ~ their pains, their lives, their
freedoms - are intentionally ignored,
often maliciously trampled, and
routinely abused. Ancient philosophers
claimed that all nonhuman animals had
been designed and placed on this earth
Just for human beings. Ancient jurists
dectared that law had been created just
for human beings. Although philosophy
and science have long since recanted,
the law has not.SOR ees eee nec aU kL ne aa
Seen ee ene nen ene een ee ace ee een etd
Pere ene ole enn te ee ee ge tee
eae
Poe eet Ca eee eee eee ee
Pe ee ane er eee er ee en
Ne ee ne en ee noe eee een ee et uk
mid-1970s and the mid-1990s, but there has been a worrying increase
Sm
ee
eeu eed
Dee ue
Ce een)
pee ect
ea eee ee)
because they were surplus to
Se ee a
See ie
Pee Re ence
Pee ee ee aE ae
does not occur naturally: these changes
ees ico
Pen eet
Ce emus
suffering, and can include injecting
De et a
Seek Rud
Se aD
distressing conditions and side effects.
Dee eno
Ce a
De ore as
Pre ee eek
Ree eee es
Pr seat
‘modified worldwide include goats, pigs,
Cee ae ee)
Se
and Frankensteinesque of all is found in
CR ee cia
Pee er aon
pluck the animal afior it has been
See
Pee an
Gee ere es
Cee es nos
eee aCe
Cee eee eed
SNe mas
this is to be burned, scalded, drowned,
Senet mo
Cte ee
Cee ea
PERC oa cree toe ced
Cee ees
en Cod
substances. None the less just one
return indicates such field trials occurred
COE re ane
Cee Ce
died in these trials, or what other bird or
Cee ea
eo iocc
To illustrate the senseless experiments
Cee eee
three examples follow. In one experiment
nce ee
implanted into robots; the cells were only
PS n ee en
CeCe eee er
were used during each experiment. It
was noted that with each change of brain
ee ese ec
by the robot. In a different facility rats
Pee een)
Ree ae De)
Ce cue ana
CE etn ete oe
Ree ee od
TN Ee eee ee
Ore eee ie
pe eae ed
better in the dark In a third experiment
Ce Cece)
Ge ee Dene
Cee eR eS
Pe eet er
See et reer
bladders are similar to those of humans
Ces Coco
We are constantly told by the
‘government, esearch organisations and
the media that animal research is.
eee urs
Oe a
eet ris
Tem Rea
Pee ee
Peat eee aT
en Nerd
Dee ee cor)
can ever be identical to the human
ee ee
pee eee ett
URS eRe)
bom with the cancer gene can in no way
pee eet cd
care et
CO ee ekg
Dee ee ed
each of them is a sentient being
Coen ud
‘senses, feelings and emotions that we
Pe eer na
Moe Tee
Te ea
respond in the same way to the suffering
OE teed
abused of all and, more than any other,
Gee ee
PeetersaU ne eg ee Cea
loud, like this... three million, three hundred and eight thousand, three hundred and thirty-one... the enormity of it
starts to sink in. This is the number of mice and rats used in animal research in 2013; rodents were used in 82 per
Ce nee eee os ee eer ee ec aoe
Doe ee ea)
Ce ue
Fe cee cae ake
situations were more de-personalised
‘when there were greater numbers of
Fe eeu a)
Pee
keer
Ce etc cod
ee ce
Gene cactus
ee eae ac
See cal
reactionary revulsion where people
Pee eee
disease, tails and sewers. Of the
statistics above, 262,641 were rats, and
that’s why I rescue rats. 'm not one of
Decree need as
eee Cue kas
eee eee eee
tena
Se eee Re ues
solving and other supposed similarities
ee eeu)
See ey
experiments teach us nothing about
either.
af
i
In their unending desire to
understand the human mind,
scientists drag themselves to the
Sat iod
subjecting a highly inteligent,
Sa eek
eee ae)
Pe esas
ee Es
deprivation, forced swimming
Been te
Rue ay
Cy
eRe
See ee
See eer)
frequently grooming one
Canc ty
eed
Cees
Sees
ee
Cnet Sie at!
Cee eet)
‘experience of laboratory conditions
Reece ea aca
heightened, where you have
nowhere to hide, nowhere to run,
Ree ee
Cee
Se a)
Deu ie usc
Perea cena
ee cd
Cee etad
Pree
‘audible to the human ear? |
Co
Tee ad
eo)
Sen a
Perera)
eet
eee
ears
Sa
i ott
Cer
ean cd
ee any
Oo
Te
Cee cd
Sune tet
ee ence et cr}
Cee corre ae
a master of design, sculpture and
Ce ts
‘explore, climb and jump and is
Cen Leta
Ceo
Lear eon
amazingly clever! They are not scaly but
ere!
thermoregulator, comprising only 5 per
cent of their total body composition; yet
they can dissipate around 17 per cent of
Pe ee ec ae)
Cee ems
Cen am
Ser meat
‘even have to like them, but please do try
Neer aCe ene)
eee we aT
ee ee
aosNEW
TECHNOLOGICAL
BREAKTHROUGH
PREDICTS AN
END TO ANIMAL
TESTING
Experts claim that experimental drugs will be used on farms
of artificial humans as a replacement for live animal testing
within three years. Smartphone-sized microchips replicating
human lungs, livers and other organs are being used to test
the body's reaction to new drugs.
‘They are branded as “human on a chip” and developers hope to
create “human farms” to replace animal testing, which is obviously
highly controversial. Chips emulating two and four organ systems
are already being used, with future versions expected to extend to
replicating all the vital functioning organs, including the brain.
Uwe Marx, a Berli-based tissue engineer for developers
TTissUse, said that the development of a “10 organ chip” was
expected within three years in @ move that could “revolutionise
drug development’. Mr Marx stated: "In the future, it will be
possible, for example, to significantly reduce the number of
animals used in pharmaceutical research and to substitute these
alternative methods instead of animal testing." According to The
Sunday Times, he sald that if their system were approved. it
would “close down most of the animal-testing laboratories
worldwide".
‘Ateam of Harvard bioengineers also maintains that animal testing
land experimentation could soon by replaced by organ-on-a-chip
technologies, which would repicate the functions of a human
| organ on @ computer chip.
Harvard's Wyss Institute has now created a living lung, heart and,
‘most recently, gut - all on microchips.
These are not silicon chips simulating the functions of various
human organs. Rather, these organs-on-a-chip contain real, living
‘human colls. In the case of the gut, @ single layer of human
intestinal cells is coorcad into growing on a flexible, porous
membrane, which is attached to the clear plastic walls of the chip.
By applying a vacuum pump, the membrane stretches and
recoils, just like a human gut going through the motions of
peristalsis. Itis ¢0 close to the real thing that the gut-on-a-chip
‘even supports the growth of living microbes on its surface, just
lke a real human intestine.
‘The Wyss Institute has also built alung-on-a-chip, which has
human lung cells on top, 2 membrane in the middle, and blood
capillary cells beneath. Air flows over the top, while real human
blood flows below. Again, a vacuum pump makes the lung-on-2-
chip expand and contract, just like @ human lung
‘These human organs-on-e-chip can be tested just ike a human
subject, and the fact that they're completely transparent makes
them perfect for observation. To test a drug, the researchers
simply add a solution of the compound to the chip and then
observe how the intestinal (or heart or lung) cells react. In the
case of the lung-on-a-chip, the Wyss team is testing how the lung
reacts to possible toxins and pollutants, and they can also see
how fast drugs (or foods) are absorbed, or test the effects of
probiatics.
This is all extremely encouraging news, and should make
scientists using animals in laboratories sit up and take notice,
bearing in mind that worldwide more than 100 million animals are
controversially used every year to test food, drugs and chemicals,
Incredibly, in the UK in 2013 there were 4,121,582 scientific
procedures carried out on animals. Last year an EU ban on the
sale of cosmetics tested on animals came into force, but
scandalously the number of scientific animal experiments carried
out in the UK continues to grow in number, despite the fact that
the Coalition Government pledged to reduce the use of animals in
scientific research — yet another broken promise for animals!!!ELECTION 2015 Xl
The nineteenth century saw the Chartists and the Reform
League begin the battle for universal suffrage in this country,
and by the third Reform Act, votes were given to all men. In
1832 the first efforts were made to secure the vote for
women, which was finally achieved almost a hundred years
later in 1929. History charts the heroic efforts of the
suffragette movement in their battle for the rights of women
to vote as equals alongside men, and they are often
compared to the present-day battles for the rights of animals.
Given the actions that were teken in our past to secure the right of
every individual to vote for democratically elected parliament, itis
the duty of those individuals to use that vote. But the question
then arises of which political party would actin a way that would
benefit animals.
‘Think back to the Labour Party manifesto of the nineties, which
promised "New Labour — New Life for Animals", stating that
‘Labour has consistently shown itseif to be the only party to trust
‘on animal welfare issues. Labour is the only party with carefully
researched policies, and the politcal will to carry them out.”
‘Animal activists, International groups and members of the public
believed them, and large donations were made to help ensure
their success in the election — but what became of their fine words
‘and promises? Labour said they would support a Royal
Commission to review the effectiveness and justification of animal
experiments, but there was no such review, and Barry Horne died
in prison as a result of a sustained hunger strike in protest against
the broken promise.
‘Aree vote on hunting took place, but the resulting bill was so
Inadequate that hounds continue to rip foxes to pieces, and the
hunt saboteurs are as busy as ever. David Cameron has long
‘made it known that he wishes to repeal the bill, and was only
thwarted from doing so by the Liberal Democrets, who, to their
credit, also refused to back a widening of badger cull zones
proposed by the Tories. Nigel Farage was seen prominently
Supporting one of last year's Boxing Day meets,
‘Small steps have been taken by consecutive governments —
Labour managed to get animals reciassified in Europe as sentient
beings instead of agricultural products — but in real terms nothing
has changed. Sows are stil kept in farrowing crates, hens
‘confined to battery cages, and calves ripped away from their
mothers at birth — the list is endlessly depressing. Live exports
continue unabated — in 2011 and 2012, 130,000 live animals were
transported from ports in the south east of England, and there is a
substantial trade in calves from Norther Ireland to the continent.
‘Some of these joumeys take up to sixty hours, and the young
animals are often reared in conditions that have been outiawed in
this country. Sheep destined for slaughter make the joumey in
cramped conditions, often with failed water tanks and ventilation
systems.
Battery-type cages are used to imprison hundrads of thousands of
pheasants and partridges to produce the eggs from which fifty
million birds will spend their bref lives in sheds and cages before
being released fo be gunned down for so-called sport. Wild,
animals are stil imprisoned and forced to perform in circuses.
Al this suffering and cruelty, and far more, is legal, and no
‘government has yet had the morality or courage to end it; itis