USAWG STRATEGY RESEARCH PROJECT
DEMOCRACY IN THE MIDDLE EAST
by
Brigadier General Abdetfattah SaidElSisi
Egyptian Army
Colonel Stephen J Gerras
Project Advice
‘The views expressed in this student academic research paper are those of the author and do not reflect
the official poley or positon of the Depertment of the Army. Department of Detense, or the US.
Goverment.
U.S. Army War College
CARLISLE BARRACKS, PENNSYLVANIA 17013Report Documentation Page
ct er pica nce ene
Igy ste clot nt mt Z
[REPORT DATE
15 MAR 2006 2. REPORT TNH
S.DATES COVERED
(00-00-2008 to 00-00-2006
“TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Democracy in the Middle East
Ss CONTRACTNUMIER
‘Sk GRANT NUMBER
‘PROGRAM ELE
AUTHOR'S)
Abdelfattah Et Sisi
Se TASK NUMER
SC.WORK UNIT NUMBER
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME{S) AND ADDRESS(ES)
US. Army War College Carlisle Barracks,Carlisle,PA,17013-50S0
1. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION
REPORT NUMBER.
'5.SPONSORINGIMONITORING AGENCY NAMES) AND ADDRESS(ES)
10, SPONSORMONFTOR'S ACRONYMS)
11. SPONSORMONITOR'S REPORT
NUMBER(S)
'2,DISTRIBUTIONAVAILABILITY STATEMENT.
Di
US. Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, Carlisle, PA, 17013-5050.
tion authorized to US Government agencies only; Administrative or Operational Use;
5-03-2006;
1 SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
(OF PAGES. | RISPONSIBL PERSON
16 AASTRACT
See attached.
15 SURIECT TERMS
Pe RaSTRACT
— ‘anmeeacr crs ace 1
unclassified unclassified unclassifiedABSTRACT
AUTHOR: BG Abdelatiah Seid EISisi
me Democrecy in the Midele East
FORMAT, StrategyResearch Project
DATE: 15 March 2008 WORDCOUNT:5127 PAGES: 17
KEYTERMS: ‘Middle East, Democracy, Strategic Vision
CLASSIFICATION: —_Unciassifed
‘This paper addresses theimpact of democratzing the Middle East. Iwill assess the
Ccurent strategic and polticl cenitions in the Middle East and wil highlight the challenge the
risks and the advantages proviced by @ democratic frm of government, Areas addressed will
include: dfering perspectives between the Middle Eastern and Western cutures: impacts of
[poverty lack education, and relgion; lack o strategic vision; psychological nature ofthe people
‘and the government; and, inherent sks of new democracies, The paper will conclude by
‘addressing the future of democracy inthe Middle East.DEMOCRACY IN THE MIDDLE EAST
‘The Middle East region is considered one of the important cntical regions in the world
‘The Midale East region is the bith place of major reigions, including Islam, Christian and
Jewish religions. The effect of te religious nature ofthe environment i evident inthe culture of
‘Middle Eastern people ands one of the most important factors that affect the polis ofthe
region. Because ofthe nature of the Middle Eastern culture, one must take into account the
religious nature of the people when conducting diplomatic negotiations and estabishing pot.
From an economic perspective, the Middle Easts blessed with huge ol and natural gas.
reserves which provide much of the word's energy needs. Because ofthis, world superpowers
‘maintain a keen focus on the area and attempt to influence and dominate the region 0 that
energy requirements for economic viability within their own county are sustained As @ result,
the Middle East is under constant pressure to satily multiple country agendas that may not
‘coincide with the needs or wants of the Middle Eastern people. Furthermore, geographically
{and from a world perspective, the Middle East isa strategic area because of the Suez Canal,
‘Straits of Hormuz and the Babel Man dab Straight. These are all rtical commercial shipping
lanes and are vital to any military considerations. The strategie nature ofthe region coupled
With religious nature ofthe culture creates an environment that prevents challenges to the
estabishment of a democracy throughout the region in the near term,
‘The Arab-Israel conflict further complicates the development of democracy, The confict
isnot strict a Palestinian and Israeli conflict, but a confi that affects all Arabs inthe Middle
East. The fact that Israel reflects a Western intrest raises suspicion among Arabs about the
‘rue nature of democracy’. This, in tur, will slow the emergence of democracy in the Middle
East and may justly a brand of democracy that truly reflects Middle Eastern interests and may
bear lite resemblance toa Western democracy, ?
Although the Middle Eastis beginning to transition towards democratic forms of
‘government, there are sil the remains of dictatorial and autocratic regimes, Coupled with the
tension tha already existsin the Middle East due tothe conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan and the
cconfict surrounding Isr, the conditions fo futher developing democracy willbe strained. The
‘existing confict and tension needs tobe resolved before democracy canbe more fully accepted
by the people ofthe area,
(On the surtace, many ofthe autocratic leaders claim that they are in favor of democratic
Ideals and forms of government, but they are leery of relinquishing contralto the veting public of
their regimes There are some valid reasons for this. First, many countries are not organizedina manner to support a democratic form of government* More important, there are security
Concems both internal and externalto the counties. Many of the nation’s police forces and
riltary forces are loyal tothe ruling party. Ifa democracy evolves with diferent consttuencies,
there is no guaranty thatthe police and military forces will align wit the emerging ruling partes.
In essence the security forces ofa nation need te develop a culture that demonstrates
‘commitment to a nation rather than a ruling party, Furthermore, regime populations need to be
Prepared to assume a paticipatory role in a democratic form of government, This will require
time to educate the population as well as develop the democratic processes that will enable
democracy to gain traction,
‘America has been a driving force the Middle East with respect to supporting America's
‘ational interests. In her effort to do so, America has supported non-democratic regimes and
‘some regimes that were not necessarily well respected inthe Middle East. Examples include
Guif State regime, Saudi Arabia, the eary Saddam regime, Morocco, Algeria, etc. AS aresut,
‘many in the Middle East question the motives ofthe Urited States and her desire to establish
‘democracy inthe Midale East now. Is transitioning to democracy inthe best interes of United
‘States, ori iin the interest ofthe Middle Eastern countries? Democracy development inthe
‘Middle East wil not easily emerge ithe ination of democracy in the Middle Eastis perceived
‘a8 amove by the United States to further her own selt-interest. Theres also concern that the
Global War on Terrorism is really just a mask for establishing Western democracy in the Middle
East. * For democracy tobe success{ulin the Middle East, it must reflect Middle Eastern
Interests and not United States" interests ony. Furthermore, democracy must be seen as being
beneficial tothe people ofthe Middle East—showing respect othe religious nature ofthe
culture as well as improving conditions forthe common man,
‘Akey benchmark for testing democracy in the Middle Eastis how democracy emerges in
Iraq. Wil America allow iraq to develop in its own way as a democracy or wil itr to shape
‘demacracy into a pro-Westem form or regime? For example, diferent Mustim groups (Musi
Brotherhood, Shia, etc.) are likely to emerge in diferent Middle Eastern countries as rung
entities in democratic forms of government. IT iraq is perceived as an American puppet, then
‘other countnes may not be enticed to move towards democracy and f they do, is America ready
tozccept Midcle Eastern democracies in their own form that may or may not be sympathetic to
Westem interests, particularly in the early years of a Middle Eastesn democracy.
The wants and desires ofthe countries’ populations themselves need to be considered
Do they really want democracy and are they wiling to change their ways to establish it and
make it work? Changing a potical culture ie always hard, itis one thing to say that ademocracy is a preferred form of government, but quite another to adjust tits requirements
‘and accept some the risks that go along witht. For example, history has shown tha inthe frst
{en years of a new democracy, confit skely to occur either externally or internally as the new
‘democracy matures.” The people comprising these new democracies must be commited to the
emecratickleel and must be wling to overcome and work through the challenges.
‘Simply changing the potical systems from autocratic rule to democratic rue will not be
{enough tobuild anew democracy. The economic, religious, education, media, security and
legal systems willallbe affected. As.a result, it wll take time for people and the nation's
systems to adjust to the new form of government and free market system that wil emerge.
Furthermore, existing democratic countries wil need tobe supportive and patient with the
burgeoning new democracies. in my opinion democracy needs good environment ike a
‘reasonable economic situation, educated people, and as moderate understanding of religious
Issues and at the end (minim acknowledge approved from regimes to share power). Given that
the Midle Eastem countries have a strong religious bas, itis important for Islamic leaders to
‘convince the Mile Eastern people that democracy is goed forthe country ands na in conic
with moderate Istamic ideals. This ype of pubic support from religious leaders can help build
‘trong support forthe establishment of democratic systems and change that will accompany the
transition
Due tothe change that willbe required and the accompanying time requirements, one
‘cannot expect the Middle Eastern countries to conver quickly to a democratic form of
‘government. There is a concern the Middle East that American isin a hury to Democratize
the Midsle East based upon its aggressive actions in aq and Afghanistan as well as its
strategy to take pre-emptive action if she chooses todo so." Moving too quickly can affect the
Stability ofthe region as American motives may be perceived as being self-centered and not
‘supportive ofthe Middle Easter way of fe, Itis important that Middle Eastem countres move
towards democracy ina logical, steady and controled manner done on the terms of Mle
Eastem counties. Yet, Western democracies will need to be supportwe; providing economic,
‘education and technological support to help fester development and change.
Concer er
Before continuing further, itis important to gain an understanding of how democracy is
perceived by the ordinary people ofthe Middle East. Democracy, as a secular entity is unikely
tobe favorably received by the vast majority of Middle Eastemers, who are devout followers of
the Islamic faith* Traditionally there is tension among the Musi countries with respect totheestablishment of a democratic form of government. On the one hand, there ae those who
believe that democratic rule can co-exist with the reigious nature ofthe Middle Eastern
societies; however, on the other hand there are those who believe thatthe tribal culture ofthe
‘Middle Eastern countries may not be suitable for democratic rule as too many factions wil
lernerge. The result wil be 8 "ractured” society that cannot effectively unite and there is also the.
risk that his could impact the cohesion produced by the Mustm faith, Although concerns exist,
for the most part, the spit of democracy, or selfrule, is viewed as a positive endeavor so long
as itbuilds up the country and sustains the religious base versus devaluing elgon and creating
instabliy. "Creating tis balance wilbe the challenge as most Western democracies have
‘attempted to maintain a separation of church and stale, What this suggests that as
‘democracy grows in the Middle East, it is not necessarly going fo evolve upon a Western
template—it wil have its own shape or form coupled with stronger religious tes,
Democracy cannot be understood in the Middle East without an understanding ofthe
concept of EI Kalafa. ElKalafa dates back tothe time ofthe prophet Mohammed." During his
life and the seventy year period that followed the ideal state of ElKalafa existed as a way of ie
‘among the people and within the governing bodies. This period of time is viewed as a very
special period and is considered the ideal form of goverment and itis widely recognized as the
{908 for any new form of government very much in the manner that the U.S. pursued the ideals
"if, liberty and pursuit of happiness", From the Miele Eastern perspective the defining
‘words governing their form of democracy would likely eflect“faimess, justice, equality, unity
‘and charity’.
‘Achieving the ideals always atthe forefront of the Middle Easter society, yet folowing
‘Mohammed's death and hs latent influence, the government which was represented by the El
Kalafa began to stray trom the ideals fostered by the prophet Mohammed. The leaders of El
Kalafa begin to 1ook inward and use power for their own wellbeing, rather than the well being of
their fellow man. Those in power attempted to secure their power by passing on leadership
Control to family members rather than the most qualifed leaders as determined by the members,
ofthe Elba, which represented El Kalafa™ As a resut, dissatisfaction wth how the El Kalafa
process was being carried out arose, and many members became disenfranchised and chose
to form their own version of El Kalafa leading tothe emergence of Trial and ethric factions
within what were once a unified Istamicbody. As we consider the Middle Eastem Islamic
body today, we stil see the fallout from the early divisions within the Islamic community, where
Various tribal and ethnic factions exist. Given this current tat, the challenge becomes one of‘attempting to reunite these tribal and ethnic factions so thatthe earliest frm of EI Kaata is
reestablished
Related tothe El Kalafa are the roles of the Elbia and Elshorah, Both ofthese processes
ere represented in he early years ofthe Muslim faith and therefore are considered important
and respected processes" The Elbaya'a is the election process for choosing the ElKalfa,
‘while the EI Shorah advisory and oversight body tothe El Kalifa or Calfate, The ElShorah
Performs its ole from a religious viewpoint, that itensures that the Calfateis carrying out is
duties in accordance with Islamic teachings. Although these processes have religious historical
ties, they also represent processes by which a democracy can emerge.
Given the religious nature ofthe Middle Eastern culture, how might a Middle Eastern
democracy is structured? Will there be three o four branches of goverment? Should a
relgious branch be added tothe executive, legislative and judicial branches to ensure thatthe
Islamic beliefs and law are followed? A simple answer might be yes, but that is probably nat the
best means. Ideally, the legislative, executive and judicial bodies should alltake Islamic beliefs
into consideration when carying out their duties. As such, there should be no need fora
‘separate eligious branch. However, to cody the major tenets ofthe Islamic faith, they should
be represented inthe constitution or similar document, This does not mean a theocracy will be
established, rather it means that a democracy willbe established built upon Islamic beliefs
[As one considers democracy inthe Middle East, the mest important action to consider is
toallowitto emerge. It may not be the same brand or shape as Western democracy, butit wil
beastar. As ageneral rule, most Middle Easterners fully support the spit of democracy and
will supportit as long as it emerges and seeks to unify the whole, This includes allowing some
factions that may be considered racial, particularly if they ate supported by @ majority through
legitimate vote, The world cannot demand democracy in the Midale East, yet denounce what
itlooks lke because a less than pro-Western party legitimately assumes ofce. For example,
the Palestinians recently elected members from theHamas group. This group isnot on
favorable terms with the U.S. and other Westem countries, yet they have legitimately elected It
is now up to the Hamas and the rest ofthe world to work out their potical diferences. itis
important that even though significant differences exis, particularly with respect to the status of
Israel, that legitimately elected partes be given the opportunity to govern. Ifthis opportunity is
‘nt provided, Middle Eastern countries wll question the credibly of Western nations and their
‘eal intentions with respectto democratic rule and what itrepresents,
[A his point in the history ofthe Middle East, the question of democracy isan important
‘one and the Middle Eastis ripe to consider it, Many inthe Middle East feel that the autocraticforms of government that currently and have previously existed have not produced the progress
that people expected, especially when compared to some other parts of the Musi world, for
example Malaysia, Pakistan and Indonesia; et alone some of the Western counties
The question of establishing democracy isnot being thwarted by Islamic tenets. The
practice of stam and democracy can coexist. When democracy was initiated inthe United
States, twas bull upon Judeo Christian values. Given the excessive influence ofthe Church of
England, the U.S. decided to incide language inthe Constitution that provided some
separation from church and stat, but religion was not eliminated from government, despite
what some are ed tobelieve. Cleary, n the early years, religion was important and shaped
the values of the American nation” In the Middle East, the approach is realy no diferent with
the exception thatthe Muslim faith i the basis upon which the Middle Eastem form of
democracy willbe built. As with the American tradition, other faiths would be alowed to exist,
but the prevalent region inthe Middle East slam, so its logical to assume that a democratic
form of government willbe founded on these beliefs. The challenge that exists is whether the
rest ofthe world willbe abe to accept a democracy in the Midale East founded on islamic
belief. Practically speaking this should not be an issue because Islamic beliefs produce
‘behavior that's more than comparable to other religious behavior,
‘The Middle East Democracy Challenges,
Internaly there are a number of challenges that will create friction in the development of
democracy. These items include the state of poverty, state of education, practice of religion,
Psychological nature of the population and the goverment. Within the Middle East, the entire
Income is $700 billion and is less than the income of the country of Spain, _When considering
allthe Musi countries, including those outside the Mile East, the entire income is les than
France, Povertyin the Middle Eastis driven by a number of factors tha include wa, for
‘example, Arab-lsrael confit, rar-raq war, Morocoo-Es Sahara confct and Syria-Lebenon, to
name a few. These have driven up both intemal and external debt and have inhibited economic
‘growth Poor economic policies and poltical decisions have exacerbated the economics.
For example, many Middle East countries attempted to sustain government controlled markets
instead of free markets and as a result no incentive developed to dive the economy."
‘Government policies with respect to jab creation led to dtficulies because too often excess jobs
Were created when sufficient funding was not avaiable to suppor the program resulting in high
‘unemployment and public disenchantment with the government Disenchant withthe
‘governments a prominent factor today and serves as a point of rcton as democracy isconsidered. Inthe minds of Middle Easterners, any government is viewed in a suspicious
manner, Furthermore, those in power seem tobe living in luxury, while the common man
‘struggles to get by. This further aggravates the perception of what government can realy do for
the people. Day o day people struggle to get by. The economy is not vibrant and many Middle
Easterners are unemployed. Given weak economic systems, people do what they need ta da ta
{get by and often corruption isa path that emerges as those who hold power and wealth tend to
‘manipulate the poorer population” As a consequence, socal behavior considers this "quid pro
quo" approach as normal, This creates cultural behavior tha is contrary tothe values upon
which a democracy is based. Upon implementing a democracy, there willbe a strong tendency
{or the population to “buy of” their politicians in return for favors. Over tee and through
education this can change, butt may take a generation or two for itto happen. To address the
slate of poverty in the Middle East, economic and political conditions must improve whether or
ota democracy’ established, The fact that change is nevessary creates an opportunity for
‘democracy; however, it also creates opportunities fr other forms of government as well some:
‘of which are not preferable, Those who promote democracy de have an opportunity now inthe
Midaie East.
poverty can be overcome in Middle Eastern countries, there can be a greater chance
that democracy wil more quickly emerge. Internaly, Middle Eastern counties must take action
to strengthen their economies, but they are unlikely to accomplish ths task without external
support from Western democracies. Support may come inthe form of investment in Middle
Eastem businesses as a well asthe establishment of business in the Middle East, Whats
important is that a commitment be made to moving the economies forward, To ensure support
is being developed adequately and that precautions are taken against the real 'sk of corruption,
a special government agency or reporting system should be established to regularly monitor the
‘conduct of Middle Eastem business. Perhapsit's time to reinvigorate the role of the Arab
League in economic matters trade oversight®* These actions could ameliorate the conditions of
poverty and give democracy a better chance.
‘As the common man in the Middle East views the bilions of dollars the US. Is spending
fn the war in rag, he may be quick to say, why don't you use that money to economically