Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Criteriond Evaluation
Criteriond Evaluation
Date:
Joeniel
16 Feb 2015
Criterion D. Evaluating
DEADLINE: 16 Feb (T) 12 midnight
Part I. Product Testing
A. Self-testing
1. Describe in a detailed paragraph how you tested your project before presenting the final version to your target
users/audience. Discuss how you checked and improved the technical/functional problems that you encountered.
(Minimum 100 words)
My project was an augmented reality to aware people of the effects of pollution. To do this I made two augmented realities on the page, one was a
video aimed at all ages to aware people of the consequences of pollution and how it could affect their lives and the lives of people around them. The
other augmented reality video was a compilation of images, images of pollution. I tested my project using the Aurasma app to make sure it worked
and there were no faults. While working I kept having to improve my video due to problems, sometimes the video wouldn't play or there wouldnt be
sound. I also had to change my augmented reality focus because at times it wasnt picking up the section to play the video.
Aspects:
Self-Score
7-8: Fully
I feel that the project could help the enviroment and help educate and aware
people of the effectes of pollution.
Aurasma, powerpoint, flipagram, and more digital tools were used effectively to
make the project more effective and understandable.
All the digital tools used were used creatively to make the project appealing for
the target audience.
The project is simple but the augmented reality isnt understood by most students
at our school. If people knew more about augmented realities and how to use
them, then the project would be able to tackle the problem of pollution at the
school.
The prototype works very well, the last step is to get more people to follow my
channel so that they can view the augmented reality from their devices.
1. Present and explain your project to 3 people from your target users or audience. Make them answer your evaluation
survey.
2. When you have gathered at least 3 feedbacks in your survey, post the link to the summary of results (the one with
graphs below.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1H1QAfudKPysyderc8EPMtyf62OIWBejyLxo3JAx0vZc&authuser=0
3. Compare the results of your evaluation survey to your self-evaluation. Complete the table below.
According to your self-evaluation
Simple Text
Professional Design
Simple Text
Multiple images
Professional design
Wasn't colorful
Directions
Appropriate question
Colorful paper
Directions
Creative Fonts
d. 3 Suggestions for
Improvement
It would be much harder to make dozens of posters and still keep them
good quality than to print the pages.
To make the poster more effective and since i was making the poster
smaller i decided to make a flipagram with all the images and put it in as
another augmented reality.
3.
4.
5.
2. Generally, how well do you think your final project successfully achieved its original goal or purpose: to create a digital
codes -based project that can address a specific school problem or situation.Discuss 3 reasons.
I feel that my final product was successful, it got the point across in a creative way.
If the audience doesnt have aurasma they will not be able to view the
augmented reality
The audience will learn how to use augmented realities for future use
The audience will make a difference for the community by helping with
the pollution and make more people aware.
if the audience isnt following my channel they will not be able to view the
augmented reality
If the poster is changed or torn the augmented reality will no longer work
and the paper will be less effective.