Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Trial 1 Results:

I. Coefficients and best model (b)


w12
-0.00128905528254109
-2.36915751616495
2.43992268079310
0.133417190426826
1.69629100452797

b12= -7.2120

w13
0.0556913628552492
0.000705601611467028
0.000664191105229661
0.00827462269303293
-0.00338052937258546
b13= -2.6179

w14
0.00931534837408421
-0.115410831250531
-0.00669807174298145
1.09682870260614
0.209169541819218
b14= -13.4249

w23
0.363257712967381
0.406927680062832
0.394574615888948
0.251573621140985
-1.06479813957605
b23= -8.9867

w24
0.00549631165631581
2.56060595596574
0.399648646599630
0.311749137662076
-1.99210605542943
b24= -0.8562

w34
-0.199379405880779
0.00769300880347424
0.00854483168060483
0.0816498542962967
0.102051494416909
b34= 5.3462
II. Parameter C:
Scale 1:

Scale 2:

Scale 3:

III. Hyper-planes Equations


a. w12
-0.0013*[Area]-2.3692*[Roundness]+2.4399*[Compactness]
+0.1334*[Mean Layer 1]+1.6963*[Standard deviation Layer 1]7.2120
b. w13
0.0557*[Area]+7.0560e-04*[Roundness]+6.6419e-04*[Compactness]
+0.0083*[Mean Layer 1]-0.0034*[Standard deviation Layer 1]-2.6179
c. w14
0.0093*[Area]-0.1154*[Roundness]-0.0067*[Compactness]
+1.0968*[Mean Layer 1]+0.2092*[Standard deviation Layer 1]13.4249
d. w23
0.3633*[Area]+0.4069*[Roundness]+0.3946*[Compactness]
+0.2516*[Mean Layer 1]-1.0648*[Standard deviation Layer 1]-8.9867
e. w24
0.0055*[Area]+2.5606*[Roundness]+0.3996*[Compactness]
+0.3117*[Mean Layer 1]-1.9921*[Standard deviation Layer 1]-0.8562
f. w34
-0.1994*[Area]+0.0077*[Roundness]+0.0085*[Compactness]
+0.0816*[Mean Layer 1]+0.1021*[Standard deviation Layer
1]+5.3462

Monas model upon validation with my own samples in a different scene or area,

Class 1 = Other Tall MW12>0, MW13>0, MW14,>0


Class 2 = Buildings MW12<0, MW23>0, MW24>0
Class 3 = Coconut MW13<0, MW23<0, MW34>0
Class 4 = Mango MW14<0, MW24<0, MW34<0

Overall Accuracy is 83.5% against my samples, but very poor producer accuracy for
other tall vegetation (44.6%).

You might also like