Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hendrick Hudson V Rowley

    Uploaded by

    DeShaun
    17 views4 pages
    The document summarizes the Supreme Court case Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley. The case involved a deaf student, Amy Rowley, who was placed in regular education classes with an IEP providing a hearing aid and speech therapy, but not a sign language interpreter as her parents requested. While the district and appeals court found she did not receive a free and appropriate public education, the Supreme Court reversed, finding the school district met IDEA requirements by providing personalized instruction and services to meet Amy's needs. The case established the "Rowley Standard" two-pronged test for determining if a school has met FAPE/IDEA standards by complying with procedures and developing an IEP reasonably

    Original Description:

    Ja wohl

    Original Title

    Hendrick Hudson v Rowley

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document summarizes the Supreme Court case Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley. The case involved a deaf student, Amy Rowley, who was placed in regular education classes with an IEP providing a hearing aid and speech therapy, but not a sign language interpreter as her parents requested. While the district and appeals court found she did not receive a free and appropriate public education, the Supreme Court reversed, finding the school district met IDEA requirements by providing personalized instruction and services to meet Amy's needs. The case established the "Rowley Standard" two-pronged test for determining if a school has met FAPE/IDEA standards by complying with procedures and developing an IEP reasonably

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    17 views4 pages

    Hendrick Hudson V Rowley

    Uploaded by

    DeShaun
    The document summarizes the Supreme Court case Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley. The case involved a deaf student, Amy Rowley, who was placed in regular education classes with an IEP providing a hearing aid and speech therapy, but not a sign language interpreter as her parents requested. While the district and appeals court found she did not receive a free and appropriate public education, the Supreme Court reversed, finding the school district met IDEA requirements by providing personalized instruction and services to meet Amy's needs. The case established the "Rowley Standard" two-pronged test for determining if a school has met FAPE/IDEA standards by complying with procedures and developing an IEP reasonably

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 4

    Board of Education of

    the Hendrick Hudson


    Central School District
    v. Rowley
    Demetrianna Antonelli
    Shaynna Jarvis
    Marc Noday
    DeShaun Lew

    The Issue
    Amy Rowley was a deaf student attending Hendrick Hudson Central school district in New
    York. She was placed into regular education classes in kindergarten to determine what
    accommodations would be necessary. The decision was made to keep her in these
    classes. In first grade, her IEP said that she would need hearing aid as well as speech
    therapy. Her parents also insisted upon a sign-language interpreter. The teacher,
    however, felt that this wouldnt be needed. Her parents, the district court and the
    appeals court felt that she didnt receive a free and appropriate education.

    Judicial Decision
    Appeals Court decision reversedRuling in favor of
    school board. The district met the requirements of
    IDEA. Amy received personalized instruction and
    related services to meet her educational needs.

    Impact on Special
    Education

    Led to the development of the Rowley Standard.

    Pronged test that determines if school has met standards under


    FAPE/IDEA

    Has the school complied with FAPE procedures?

    Is the IEP developed reasonable for educational benefits?

    You might also like