Russian History- Current Events Presentation Rubric

14

Presenter's Name: Mate

Period: Li
Date: I IM i
Country:IC(4".
0.
Topic: CIA ("Mks si tzt 1.O v%
Evaluator:
Learning Target 1: I can evaluate continuity and change over the course of world history.
Developing
Beginning
Accomplished
Exemplary

Cse,

X
P rotocol

C ontent
o

The speaker introduced

themselves the article
title/topic, and the article
source clearly and at the
beginning of the
presentation.
The article is long
enough to provide the
major details about the
topic.
The presenter was
clearly well prepared for
their presentation and
spoke clearly,
confidently, and
knowledgeably about
their current event.
The article is very
relevant to their country
of expertise and the
presenter shows their
understanding by
making connections
to other content or
applying their
understanding to other
contexts.
s

Overall Assessment:

The speaker failed to

introduce ONE of the
following items;
themselves, the article
title/topic, or the article
source at the beginning
of the presentation.
o The article is long
enough to provide a
solid overview of the
topic.
A The presenter appeared
to have a basic
understanding of their
topic and presented the
information clearly.
The presenter knows
some background
knowledge on their
country and is able to
make basic connections
between their current
event and their nation's
history/culture/politics.

AE

The speaker failed to

introduce TWO of the
following items;
themselves, the article
title/topic, or the article
source at the beginning of
the presentation.
The article is too short or
leaves out major details.

The presenter seemed to

be missing some important
pieces of information or
the presentation was
unclear or not fully
understood by the
presenter.
The presenter was clearly
not prepared ahead of
time and frequently read
from the article rather than
summarizing in their own
words.

The speaker failed to

begin with any sort
of introduction of
themselves or their
current event.
The article contains
little valuable
information and
leaves more
questions than
answers.
The presentation
seems thrown
together at the last
minute.
The article may not
have been fully read
or understood.