188 The Colometry of Latin Prose
terns in early oratory. One literary historian who has spec
ulated on the influence of Roman poetry on the development
of rhythmical oratorical prose at Rome attributes this influ-
ence to Ennius’ Annales
Ennius* abandonment of the native Latin Saturnian
meter for the Greek hexameter probably meant that
greater attention had to be given to the quantity of
syllables in Latin, and this paved the way for imita-
tion of Greek prose rhythm later in the century. 27
But Ennius was hardly the first to use quantitative verse in
Latin: Livius Andronicus, Naevius, and Plautus, to name a
few notables, had preceded him. Nor do the Annales seem so
close in style to Roman oratory of any period as does the or-
nate everyday speech of a dramatist such as Plautus. 7%
Still, Ennius provides a convenient starting point for a
discussion of the development of rhythm in Roman oratory.
It has long been recognized that in ORF 8.29, from a speech
whose date is disputed, Cato's phrase mare velis florere
vidérés echoes a lost passage of Ennius.?° what is not
often noticed is that this phrase contains an adonic or
27. Kennedy, The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World, 31.
28. It is, of course, customary to refer to Plautus" language as
"colloquial." Use of a single term, however, is imprecise, since the
style of the cantica and long verses is significantly different from
that of the senarii. See Happ, "Die Lateinische Umgangssprache und die
Kunstsprache des Plautus," for a good discussion of stylistic variation
in Plautus and for further bibliography on the subject.
29, Most scholars agree that the speech (or speeches) Dierum dicta~
run _de_consulatu_suo was originally delivered in 191-190 B.C. [t also
seems likely that it was at some point revised, perhaps for publication
as a pamphlet after Cato's censorship. See Malcovati, ORF, ad loc.;
Leo, Geschichte der rémischen Literatur, 283n2; Astin, Cato the Censor,
60n30.
30. Norden, Die antike Kunstprosa 1.168. Till, La lingua di Catone,
41-42, with appendix by C, de Meo, 193-97. To my knowledge, sblendorio,
in “Note sullo stile dell'oratoria catoniana,” is the first scholar
interested in prose style to call attention to the metrical shape of the
phrase, although she makes no association with Ennius. In fact, the
hexameter rhythm of the phrase goes back one foot beyond the clavsula,Cola and the Early Hietory of Latin Proce 189
heroic clausula--that is, the rhythmical end of a dactylic
hexameter, Ennian language and Ennian rhythm coincide in
what seems to have been a rather picturesque digression on
Cato's journey to Emporiae.>!
If, as seems likely, Cato deliberately echoes Ennius here,
in imagery and in rhythm, then it is reasonable to seek fur-
there evidence of interest in the rhythms of contemporary
poetry and of rhythm in general. The repeated use of atque
in the oratorical fragments,?? and the predominance of -ere
perfect verb endings’? deepen the suspicion that Cato worked
to make his oratory rhythmical. Cicero's comment that Cato's
oratory lacked numeri is an obstacle, but not an insurmount-
able one, for Cicero is probably referring to the particular
clausulae that he, with his essentially Greek theory, pre-
ferred.*4
Table 5S (p. 190) lists Cato's use of certain rhythms,
at colon ends and at sentence ends in the oratorical frag-
ments and, for purposes of comparison, in the literary por-
tions of the De agri cultura.?> only the oratorical frag-
3]. The entire expedition is discussed by Astin, Cato the Censor, 28-
50, with citation of earlier bibliography.
32. Sblendorio, "Note sullo stile dell'oratoria catoniana," provides
statistics on usage of atque. Fraenkel, Leseproben, 130, suggests that
Cato's otherwise unexplained preference for atque in the orations
is due to considerations of rhythm.
33. Sblendorio, "Note sullo stile dell'oratoria catoniana," 8, with
further bibliography.
34. Cic. Brutus 68. At Brutus 96 Cicero writes of M. Aemilius Lepi-~
dus Porcina: Hoc in oratore Latino primum mihi videtur et levitas apparu-
isse illa Graecorum et verborum comprensio et iam artifex, ut ita dicam,
stilus, which I take to mean the use of rhythmical clausulae preferred by
Cicero, and the "periodic" style. See also Prinmer, "Der Prosarhythmus
in Catos Reden.”
35. The De agri cultura, and not nineteenth-century, pre-Zielinskian,
Latin prose, serves as the basis of comparison, since the latter repre-
sents a completely separate stage of the language, one influenced, in one
way or another, by the achievement of Cicero. Passages of the De agri
cultura are praefatio 1.1-2.6, and 157.1-9.190
TABLE 5
The Colometry of Latin Prose
Occurrence of Clausulae in Cato:
Colon-Final and Sentence-Final Combined
Rhythm
Dichoree -u-*
Choriamb -uu*
Double spondee -- --
internal
final
Cretic + molossus
-u- =
Cretic + iamb -u-ua
(hypodochmius)
Cretic + spondee -u- -*
Spondee + cretic
-ua
“cretic colon"? -uu-u=
Dochmiac u--un
Paeon uuue
Ithyphallic -Xx-x-9
Reizianum u-u-4
anu-o
Heroic -uu-%
Double cretic -u- -ua
Molossus + cretic
soe -un
Others
oratory
(% of total)
De
Agricultura
(% of total)
9.6
14.4
18.8
18.6 21.6
31.2 9.3
1.5
2.7Cola and the Early History of Latin Prose 191
ments preserved by Aulus Gellius have been analyzed here,
because of Gellius' relative reliability as a source of
36 and because of his demonstrable interest in
37
early Latin
preserving colon boundaries in his citations.
The samples are not (and cannot be) large enough to per=
mit application of statistical tests. Judgment alone can
determine what differences in use of clausulae are impor~
tant.°® rhe overall proportion ef double spondees is rough-
ly the same in the two samples, yet there has been a dis-
tinct move from use at colon end to use at sentence end in
the oratorical fragments. That this change represents a
deliberate attempt to weight the end of sentence seems like
ly from even one example:
Saepe audivi inter os atque offam multa intervenire
posse; verumvero inter offam atque herbam, ibi vero 3,
longum_intérvalium Est. (ORE 8.217)
Other clausulae are preferred slightly in the oratorical
fragments: hypodochmius (or anaclastic dochmiac), ithyphal-
lic, reizianum of the shape -
, and heroic. The prefer-
ence for any one of these clausulae may not seem striking,
yet the list itself is, for it is a list of “important
40 The hypodechmius, ithyphallic,
Plautine clausulae.
36. On Gellius' reliability, see Mercklin, “Die Citiermethode und
Quellenbenutzung des A, Gellivs," and Kretzschmer, De auctoribus A.
Gellii_gramnaticis.
37. See above, pp. 90-98.
38. In this table, all clausulae begin with a stressed syllable. Ob-
viously the same sentence or colon end can be marked in several ways.
All clausula analysis is to some extent circular. I hope that the fairly
strict adherence to demonstrable rules of colometry and restriction to
the fragments preserved by Gellius give the table a certain validity.
39. Kennedy, The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World, 50, has also
commented on the effect of the preponderance of double spondees in the
oratorical fragments of Cato (the "thudding ---- " and the "serious in-
tensity which characterizes Cato's oratorical prose").
40. I quote Questa, Due cant
ca della Bacchides, 80,192, Phe Colemetry of Latin Prose
reizianum, and heroic clausula are among those metra used in
Plautine cantica to bring to a close a longer passage of dif-
ferent but related meter. ‘+
The ways in which these clausulae are employed in the
oratorical fragments of Cato seem especially noteworthy. As
was argued above (pp. 172 f£.), it is not so much occurrence
of a clausula, especially one at colon end, that is signifi-
cant, as is its occurrence in a particular rhythmical
context. The hypodochmius does not occur frequently, but
its repetition in fragment 58 is striking:
pay
Quis hanc contlimeiiam . . atqye maximam conttime-
idm... magna virtité praeditos
The rhyme in fragment 111, quem mdrbu(s) tenet 1quendi and
tamquam veternosum bibendi atque dormiend!, is emphasized by
the repetition of the ithyphallic segment, as is the case in
fragment 163, a recte consiilendo| atque Intellégendo. What
may be regarded as a pair of heroic clausulae occur together
at 193: homines defoderunt in terra diniéiatés ignemque
circlimpSsticrunt: ita interfecerunt. '?
The emphatic use of Plautine clausulae provides one link
between Cato's oratory and the comedies of Plautus: the
structure of entire Catonian phrases or sentences provides
another. When Cato writes
Quantum luctum| quantum gemitum| quia lacrimarum|
quantum fletum factum-audivi
(ORF 8.58; see above p. 186)
he is echoing the practice, especially common in early Roman
verse, of emphasizing successive metra (here, trochaic metra)
41. Wilamowitz, Griechische Verskunst, 396ff., identifies the heroic
(adoneus), hypodochmius (anaclastic dochmius), and veizianum as true
"Rarzvers" in Greek metric. Wilamowitz also noticed the importance of
the hypodochmius in Plautus (Griechische Verskunst, 406).
42. The elausulae in Plautus are always preceded by diaeresis (Questa,
Due cantica delle Bacchides, 89). T have not observed this rule in iden-
tifying the clausulae in the orators, although it is interesting to note
that in every instance of repeated clausulae, the first occurrence is
marked by diaeresis.Cola and the Barly History of Latin Prose 193
through anaphora or assonance.*? piautus Ps
695, se:
amorem _scis laborem scis egestatem meam, and Naevius com.
76, alii adnutat alii adnictat alium amat alium tenet, are
among numerous verse examples of this phenomenon. **
The opening of Cato's speech in behalf of the Rhodians
(ORF 8.163) contains a succession of syntactic cola with the
shape of Plautine cretic cola:
scio solere plerisque hominibus
rebus secundis
atgue proiixis
atqué prospéris
afafmum Jexce11ére
atqie stparbfan
atque froclam
augescere atque crescere.
There is a close parallel to this use of varying cretic cola
in succession in Mostellaria 108ff.
afque i1iud sacpe ¢it tompestas venit
ConfYingit tegtias imbricésque“ibt
démints Tndivigens reddére ‘aifas revolt
venit imber, 1avit pariétes, perpluont
43. On coincidence of rhetorical and metrical units in early Repub-
lican drama, see Jocelya, The Tragedies of Ennius, 34-35 and 370-71.
Certainly the relationship between metrical and syntactic units is an
important aspect of Greek dramatic lyric, but it is handled in a com
pletely different way from that used by Roman poets. See A. M.
Dale, ‘The Lyric Metres of Greek Drama (Cambridge, 1968), 145-475
T. C. W. Stinton, CQ n. s., 27 (1977) 27-66; J. N. Rash, Meter and
Language in the Lyrics of the Suppliants of Aeschylus (New Yor
1961); and B. Gentili, Lo spettacolo nel mondo antico (Rome, 1977), 58-
59.
44. Cato's sentence, with its anaphora and avoidance of a final cre~
tic marked by diaeresis, seems closer to literary trochaic lines, such
as those cited in the text, than to "primitive" or folk versus quadratus,
which Fraenkel sees as the precutsor of the former. See Fraenkel, “Die
Vorgeschichte des Versus Quadratus.”194 The Colometry of Latin Prose
tigna putefacit, perdit operam fabri;
nequidr factis iam/est deus seatim. 4°
The organization of distinct grammatical cola into separate
metrical units is especially common in cretic passages in
Plautus. 46
The emphatic use of Plautine clausulae can be traced
through the oratorical fragments almost to the time of Cic-
ero. Laelius Sapiens concluded his laudatie for Scipio
Aemilianus with an ithyphallic segment:
maxime Vive ‘opis est Quirités (ORF 20.22)
Aemilianus himself, in an agitated passage of his defense
against Tiiberius Asellus, uses the same phrase in ithyphal-
lic shape three times, each time in connection with the
iambic metron that Fraenkel has identified as a characteris—
tic colon shape throughout the history of Latin prose:
Si hoc ita est: qui spdndet mY1i nummim? si tu
plus tertia parte pecuniae paternae perdidisti at-
que absumpsisti in flagitiis, si hoc ita est: qui
spondet niill@ nGmmtm? Non vis nequitiam. Age mali-
tiam saltem defende. Si tu verbis conceptis coniura-
visti sciens scienge animo tuo, si hoc ita est: qui
spondét milré nummim? (ORF 21.19)
(I take the repeated use of qui to be a case of "Auftakt"
Friedrich Blass long ago called attention to the re~
peated rhythms in a selection from L. Licinius Crassus:
—% 4 Yaa ar
Bryte quid sedes? Quid illam anum patra nuntiazé vis
tu? Quid illis omnibus quorum imagines duci vides?
Quid maioribis tits? (ORF 66.45)
=v
Elsewhere in the same fragment one finds qui_numquam castra
au &
aU
vidéris? an é1oquentiae? The repeated rhythm throughout,
45. Professor Wendell Clausen called my attention to the passage
at Most. 108f£.
46. E.g., Curc. 148, Amph. 220, Men. 115.
47. On “Auftakc," see above, p. 101.Cola and the Barly History of Latin Prose 195
as Blass failed to note, is the Plautine hypodochmius, Pseu-
dolum tuom.*®
And in a speech delivered about sixteen years prior to
that of Crassus, Q. Caecilius Metellus Numidicus uses a
repeated hypodochmius to call attention to the grammatical
organization of a sentence:
Nam cum indignissimum arbitror
cui a viris bonig benedicatur
tum ne idonéum quidem
cui a probis maledicatur. (ORF 58.6)
The same brief fragment, it should be noted, shows an empha-
tic use of the ithyphallic (nunc quod ad illum attinet, gui-
rités), repeated choriambs (neque amicum recipio neque inimi-
cumcum respicio), but only one occurrence of the infamous
Hellenistic dichoree (dictitarit) .
It is only in the oratory of Cicero that one encounters
enough material for statistical study of clausulae. Cic-
ero's preferred sentence clausulae are not the same as
49 nor does an examination of internal clausulae turn
up any important similarities to Cato.°° Cicero learned the
Cato's,
48. Blass, Die Rhythmen der asianischen und rdmischen Kunstprosa, 105,
where the separation of patri and tuo to create the rhythm is also no-
ticed. Blass’ book has long been neglected, no doubt due to its exces=
ses. But Blass' emphasis on the lyric origin of prose rhythm is surely
right. In addition, while his theory of responsion and repetition is
stated in such an extreme way as to be little different from the obser-
vation that certain writers preferred certain clausulae, his emphasis on
examining a particular rhythn in its context is certainly a valuable one
for anyone interested in appreciating prose rhythm as a literary phenome-
non, and not just as a tool for textual critics. Glausulae in the pas-
sage fron Crassus are marked by Norden, Die antike Kunstptosa, 174-75,
without comment.
49. Primer, "Der Prosarhythmus in Catos Reden." Primer is correct
to observe that there is no statistical evidence to suggest that Cato
preferred the same sentence clausulae as Cicero. This observation need
not entail a rejection of Fraenkel's claim that certain aspects of
thythm are similar in Cato's oratory and in Cicero's.
50. TI have counted only the internal clausulae in the first part
of the Sixth Philippic, but the results are not promising. See above,
pp. 170-74.196 The Colometry of Latin Prose
use of rhythmical clausulae chiefly from Greek rhetoricians,
and, while he (or they) selected rhythms appropriate to the
Latin language, Cicero's clausulae do not seem to echo Roman
drama in quite the same way that the rhythms of Cato and oth-
ers do. Cicero implicitly rejects the hypodechmius as a sen-
tence clausula, as a passage in orator 233 shows. ‘There he
rearranges C. Gracchus' expression abesse non potest quin
eiusdem hominis sit probos improbare| qui imprébos probét in
such a way as to put the dichoree at the end of the sentence,
while the hypodochmius is embedded in the sentence: quin
eiusdem hominis sit qui improbos probet| probos improbare.
An even more obvious rewriting for rhythm occurs in Coelius
Antipater's substitution of diequinti_Romae in Capitolium
curabo tibi cena sit cocta,°* with its cretic plus spondee,
for Cato the Elder's expression diequinti in Capitolio tibi
cen’ cocta @rit,°? with its hypodechmius marked by diaeresis.
But there are ways in which Cicero's stylistic practice
does recall Plautus and Roman drama. Fraenkel has called
attention to the recurrent use of iambic metra containing
whole phrases or questions, a practice not unlike that of
54
Plautus and Cato mentioned earlier. what is more, Cicero's
practice of colometry occasionally works specifically to cre-
ate the effect of a prose lyric; that is, concern with rhythm
becomes so important as to dominate the disposition of words
into cola.
si. te Tong been known that Cicero and other Romans did not
derive their metrical practice directly from Greek oratory. Recently
C. Wooten has pointed out that even the interest of the Greek rhetor
cians of the second and first second centuries B.C. in prose style, inclu-
ding rhythm, was piqued by Roman demand ("Le developpement du style
Asiatique").
52. Peter, Historicorum Romanorum reliquiae,
53. Peter, Historicorum Romanorum reliquiae, 86.
54. Leseproben, 190-92; see above p. 173, pp. 192ff.Cola and the Early History of Latin Prose 197
The opening of the Pro Murena, a passage noteworthy for
its evocation of archaic Roman prayer, is also remarkable for
its colometry.
Quae precatus a dis immortalibus sum iudices| more
institutoque maiorum| illo die quo auspicato| comi-
tiis centuriatis| L. Murena consulem renuntiavi|| ut
ea res| mihi fidei magistratuique meo| populo plebi-
5 que Romanae| bene atque feliciter eveniret|| cadem
precor| ab isdem dis immortalibus| ob eiusdem homi-
nis consulatum| una cum salute obtinendum|| et ut
vestrae mentes atque sententiae| cum populi Romani
voluntatibus suffragiisque consentiant| | aque res|
10 vobis populoque Romano| pacem tranquillitatem/ otium
concordiamque adferat.|| Quod si illa sollemnis comi-
tiorum precatio| consularibus auspiciis consecrata|
tantam habet in se vim et religionem| quantam rei
publicae dignitas postulat|| idem ego sum precatus| |
15 ut eis quoque hominibus| quibus hie consulatus me
rogante datus esset| ea res| fauste| feliciter| pros-
pereque eveniret.|| Quae cum ita sint fudices! et
cum omnis deorum immortalium potestas| aut translata
sit ad vos| aut certe communicata vobiscum|| idem
20 consulem vestrae fidei commendat| qui antea dis im-
mortalibus commendavit|| ut eiusdem hominis voce|
et declaratus consul et defensus| beneficium populi
Romani| cum vestra atque omnium civium salute tue-
atur.||5
Cicero has deliberately altered word order as, for example,
in the separation of precatus and sum in line 1,°° in order
to create cola of approximately the same length throughout
the proem. The proem falls neatly into two halves (Quod si,
11, marks the transition) linked by the repetition of ea
res (ut ea res at 3-4, eaque res at 9, and ea res at 16) and
other phrases (precatus at 1 and precor at 6/ precatio at 12
and precatus at 14; populo plebique Romanae at 4-5, populi
Romani at 8, populogue Romano at 10/ populi Romani at 22-23;
bene_atque feliciter eveniret at 5/ fauste feliciter pros-
pereque evenit at 16-17). In addition, pairs of cola end in
35. Above, pp. 158-62.
56. Marouzeau, L'ordre des mots, vol. complémentaire, 38, explains
the separation of participle from form of esse as emphasizing the
action of the colon.198 The Colometry of Latin Prose
identical clausulae, which serve to reinforce grammatical or
semantic similarities:
a
ob eiusdem hominis consulatum
una cum salute obt Ynendin. qa)
atgué sontentize,
=isque consentiant (8-9)
~i commend’,
conmendavit (20-24)
et _declarStgs consul
é defensis (22)
= enn
And in the pair of phrases pacem tranquillitatem and otium
cOncordiamque adferat (lines 10-11) the natural Latin ten-
dency to pause between items in a list is overcome by the
57
desire for rhythmical smoothness. Articulation of cola
Cicero may have seen in archaic Roman prayers, °° and the par-
ticular clausulae employed are the favorites of his teachers
of rhetoric, but the use of identical rhythms to emphasize
grammatical, semantic, or phonic similarities is the legacy
of the entire Roman oratorical tradition, and ultimately of
lines such as Plautus!
TS
stipreno vailas viripotentt
Spés spes bénas coplas commédanti
(bacchiacs, Persa 252-53)
-o «4 -— va
atque illud saepe fit tempestas vénit
(cretic cola, Most. 108)
ne tu istic hodie malo tuo compositis néndaciis
followed five lines later by
— -«44
non edepol volo profecto at pol profecto ingratiis
(tr, amph. 366)
BT. Above, pp. 144-47. The use of a succession of pairs of words,
with each paii alliterative, is also a feature of Italic sactal lan-
guage: Durante, "Prosa ritmica," 62.
58. Durante, "Prosa ritmica.” Gf. the carmen devotionis preserved
at Macrobius Sat. 3.9.11; eosque ego vicarios pro me fide magistratui-
que meo pro populo Romano exercitibus legionibusque nostris do devoveo.Cola and the Early History of Latin Prose 199
In addition, the organization of enumerated items into
longer, rhythmical cola recalis such Piautine expressions as
Urbem Zgrun_aras focos| seque uti deder ae
(cr#, amph. 226)
ut gesserit rem publicam ductu _imperio Sussicts wus.
(iaB, Bmph. 196)
vorsa sparsa terta strata| lautaque coctaque_omm{a_
putt sint
(er®, Ps. 164)
Finally, the crescendo in the sentence eadem precor . . .
consentiant can now be seen not as a natural expression in
Latin prose, but as the result of generations of refinement
in prose style under the influence of prayers, Greek profes=
sors, and poetry.
It is customary to refer to the interdependence of perio-
dicity and rhythmical clausulae in discussing Latin or Greek
style.°? whe literary history of Greek xecognizes that
attention to poetry produced periodic prose and that lyric
poetry provided the impetus for the use of preferred clausu-
lae in oratory.°° Something similar can now be said of
Roman oratory. To ancient rhetoric, the placement of a long
colon at the end of a sentence was an important element of
periodic styie.®t Roman poetry and Roman prose learned the
59. Following, among others, Cicero's account in the Orator and De
Oratore (Primmer, "Der Prosarhythmus in Catos Reden"
60. On the use of preferred clausulae (a relatively late develop-
ment in Greek) and lyric poetry, see Blass, Die Rhythmen der asianischen
und rSmischen Kunstprosa. On the dependence of early Greek prose on
poetry (lyric and otherwise) and, in particular, on music, see Norden,
Die antike Kunstprosa, 41ff. The use of Latin song to understand prose
is not a problem. Cf. Cicero's approbation of Fannius (De or. 3.183)
for opening a speech with a series of cretics, si Quirites minas illius,
similar to those found in a tetrameter of Ennius: Quid petam praesidi
aut _exsequar? quove nunc - . . - To the ancients, “long verses” such
as cretic tetrameters were cantica.
61. Todesco, "Periodi oratorii," ascribes the preference for cre~
scendo to a concern with musicality. In addition to the ancient sources
cited by Todesco, see Dem. Eloc. 18.200 The Colometry of Latin Prose
order short-long for non-parallel cola at roughly the same
time. And the rhythms used by Cato to mark the ends of cola
and sentences, while they may very well be natural cadences
of the Latin language, have a certain nuance from relation
to Plautine meter; indeed, their emphatic use may have been
inspired by such. Eric Laughton has reminded us of the rar-
ity of periodic style at Rome®*--rare, I suspect, because of
its difficulty, and difficult because it was not natural.
Sacral language and Greek rhetoric contributed to the devel-
opment of oratorical prose (periodic and otherwise), but
Roman poetry, too, deserves its place in any account of the
development of Latin prose style.
62. Laughton, "The Learner and the Latin Period.”
An Ironic Allusion at "Aeneid" 1.374 Author(s) : Robert Dobbin Source: Mnemosyne, Fourth Series, Vol. 55, Fasc. 6 (2002), Pp. 736-738 Published By: Brill Stable URL: Accessed: 26-01-2016 20:32 UTC
O Fons Bandusiae Author(s) : John R. Wilson Source: The Classical Journal, Vol. 63, No. 7 (Apr., 1968), Pp. 289-296 Published By: Stable URL: Accessed: 10/06/2014 21:33
Juvenal, Satire 1.155-7 Author(s) : Anthony A. Barrett Source: The Classical Quarterly, New Series, Vol. 27, No. 2 (1977), Pp. 438-440 Published By: On Behalf of Stable URL: Accessed: 03/06/2014 10:01