Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ahu Bsria Final Report
Ahu Bsria Final Report
Ahu Bsria Final Report
performance tests
Final Report 53830/1
Carried out for
Air Handlers Northern Ltd
By Calum Maclean
15 November 2010
Date:
15 November 2010
Issued by:
BSRIA Limited
Old Bracknell Lane West,
Bracknell,
Berkshire RG12 7AH UK
E: bsria@bsria.co.uk W: www.bsria.co.uk
Compiled by:
Approved by:
Title:
Title:
Group Manager
MicroClimate & Test
This report must not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of an executive director of BSRIA. It is only
intended to be used within the context described in the text.
BSRIA
Page 3 of 11
CONTENTS
CONTENTS
1
INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................... 5
INSTRUMENTATION.................................................................................................................... 5
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
TABLES
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6
Table 7
FIGURES
Figure 1 Test setup ............................................................................................................................... 6
BSRIA
Page 4 of 11
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
BSRIA was contacted by Air Handlers Northern Ltd to test an air handling unit (AHU). The unit
consisted of a combined air supply and extract system. The tests were conducted during March and
April 2010. A range of tests was conducted for a range of outside air conditions including summer,
winter and mid-season.
The tests were conducted to determine the capacity and the energy used by the unit during the range of
conditions tested.
The construction of the test facility, the instrumentation used, the data collected, analysis and the
derived conclusions are presented in this report.
INSTRUMENTATION
2.1
TEMPERATURE AND HUMIDITY
Two types of sensors were used to measure temperature during the test, platinum resistance
thermometers (PRTs) and combined Vaisala temperature and relative humidity (RH) sensors.
2.2
AIR FLOWRATES
Before the testing took place, pressure drop against flow rate curves were taken for the supply and
extract coils within the unit. The pressure drop and flowrate were measured using a Wilson flowgrid,
fitted to the extract side of the AHU, and a set of micro-manometers. The airflow rates were recorded
during the testing by measuring the pressure drop across the coils.
2.3
ELECTRICAL AND THERMAL LOADS
Power consumption measurements were conducted on the AHUs using two Yokogawa power meters
during the tests. One Yokogawa power meter was measuring the total power into the AHU and the
second Yokogawa was measuring the compressor power only.
2.4
CALIBRATION
All equipment significant to measurements is regularly serviced and maintained according to the
manufacturers instruction and is regularly calibrated in accordance with the BSRIA quality
requirements.
BSRIA
Page 5 of 11
UNIT DESCRIPTION
UNIT DESCRIPTION
The air supplied to the building is conditioned using a combination of a thermal wheel and a coil
supplied from a compressor to provide cooling or heating as required. The compressor capacity was
variable over the range of 10% to 100% in both cooling and heating modes.
The thermal wheel is switched off during the cooling tests via the units control system.
TEST PROCEDURE
4.1
TEST SETUP
The black Xs show the placement of the humidity and temperature probes and consist of four probes
each. The pressure drop across the supply and extract coils was measured during the testing to allow a
measure of the air volume flowrate. The air volume flowrate against pressure drop curves for the two
coils were recorded prior to the tests by use of a Wilson flow grid.
Combined %RH and temperature probe placements:
A.
B.
C.
D.
BSRIA
Page 6 of 11
TEST PROCEDURE
The tests were conducted at the settings requested by the client, to simulate a range of conditions
including summer, winter and mid season.
The test data was recorded at 1 minute intervals and averaged over the test period when completed.
The air was supplied to the AHU at the required condition by use of a range of equipment depending
on the condition required. The supply conditions were held constant throughout the test period.
4.2
TEST CONDITIONS
Test description
Air on temperature
Air supply to
building
temperature
Airflow volume
Test number
Table 1
Units
m3.s-1
Cooling 1
24.5
20.0
26.0
1.0
Cooling 2
30.0
20.0
26.0
1.0
Heating 1
1.0
20.0
20.0
1.0
Heating 2
4.0
20.0
20.0
1.0
Heating 3
8.0
20.0
20.0
1.0
Heating 4
0.0
26.0
20.0
0.8
BSRIA
Page 7 of 11
5
Table 2
TEST RESULTS
Test 1 Cooling 1
Date of test
Start time of test
Length of test
HP Low (gauge)
HP High (gauge)
LP Low (gauge)
LP High (gauge)
Compressor percentage
Power to compressor
Compressor power high
Compressor power low
Fresh air temp
Air onto coil temp
Air off coil temp
Air return temp
29-Apr-10
14:48:30
30.0
12.9
14.0
5.2
7.0
36.0
1.20
2.72
0.48
24.5
24.2
20.2
26.2
Minutes
Bar
Bar
Bar
Bar
%
kW
kW
kW
C
C
C
C
1.00
ms-1
0.97
4.91
5.3
32.6
32.5
ms-1
kW
kW
Hz
Hz
Table 3
Test 2 Cooling 2
Date of test
Start time of test
Length of test
HP Low (gauge)
HP High (gauge)
LP Low (gauge)
LP High (gauge)
Compressor percentage
Power to compressor
Compressor power high
Compressor power low
Fresh air temp
29-Apr-10
16:26:30
30.0
17.6
17.6
5.3
5.3
100.0
3.00
3.05
1.58
30.2
Minutes
Bar
Bar
Bar
Bar
%
kW
kW
kW
C
30.1
20.0
26.3
C
C
C
0.99
ms-1
1.03
12.27
12.4
32.7
32.6
ms-1
kW
kW
Hz
Hz
BSRIA
TEST RESULTS
Page 8 of 11
Table 4
Test 3 Heating 1
Date of test
Start time of test
Length of test
HP Low (gauge)
HP High (gauge)
LP Low (gauge)
LP High (gauge)
Compressor percentage
Power to compressor
Compressor power high
Compressor power low
Fresh air temp
Air onto coil temp
Air off coil temp
Air return temp
30-Apr-10
9:50:00
30.0
10.1
12.0
3.6
4.3
55.0
1.33
2.23
0.46
0.8
15.1
20.0
20.4
Minutes
Bar
Bar
Bar
Bar
%
kW
kW
kW
C
C
C
C
1.03
ms-1
0.99
6.18
24.3
32.7
32.6
ms-1
kW
kW
Hz
Hz
Table 5
Test 4 Heating 2
Date of test
Start time of test
Length of test
HP Low (gauge)
HP High (gauge)
LP Low (gauge)
LP High (gauge)
Compressor percentage
Power to compressor
Compressor power high
Compressor power low
30-Apr-10
11:02:30
30.0
10.0
11.8
3.9
4.7
43.0
1.14
2.21
0.48
Minutes
Bar
Bar
Bar
Bar
%
kW
kW
kW
3.5
16.1
20.0
20.4
C
C
C
C
1.02
ms-1
1.01
4.93
20.7
32.7
32.6
ms-1
kW
kW
Hz
Hz
BSRIA
TEST RESULTS
Page 9 of 11
Table 6
Test 5 Heating 3
Date of test
30-Apr-10
12:40:00
30.0
9.8
11.4
4.4
5.3
30.0
0.93
2.21
0.48
8.2
17.3
20.0
19.9
Minutes
Bar
Bar
Bar
Bar
%
kW
kW
kW
C
C
C
C
0.99
ms-1
1.03
3.34
14.5
32.7
32.6
ms-1
kW
kW
Hz
Hz
Table 7
Test 6 Heating 4
Date of test
Start time of test
Length of test
HP Low (gauge)
HP High (gauge)
LP Low (gauge)
LP High (gauge)
Compressor percentage
Power to compressor
Compressor power high
30-Apr-10
15:23:00
30.0
13.8
13.8
2.9
2.9
100.0
2.43
2.46
2.41
-0.3
15.0
25.6
20.7
kW
C
C
C
C
0.81
ms-1
0.77
10.63
25.9
27.4
27.9
ms-1
kW
kW
Hz
Hz
BSRIA
TEST RESULTS
Minutes
Bar
Bar
Bar
Bar
%
kW
kW
Page 10 of 11
A range of tests were completed on the air handling unit at the requested conditions of the client to
simulate summer, mid season and winter conditions.
Tests 1 to 5 show that the unit was able to provide the conditioned air at the requested temperature, of
20C, from an ambient temperature of between 1C and 30C at a volume flowrate of 1.0 m3.s-1.
During the heating tests the thermal wheel was on for heat recovery from the extract air from the
simulated building. The thermal wheel was inactive during the two cooling tests.
Test 6 shows that the unit can provide 0.8 m3.s-1 of conditioned air at 26C to a building at a fresh air
inlet temperature of 0C. The test was conducted to check the winter heating capacity at maximum
compressor duty.
BSRIA
Page 11 of 11