Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 189

Chapter #1

Introduction

CHAPTER # 1

INTRODUCTION
1.1 NAPHTHA
Naphtha is a petroleum fraction invariably consists of c 6 to c10 hydrocarbons.
Naphtha is widely used in fertilizer plants and petrochemical industries as a feed stock. It
is a highly volatile product, manufactured from crude oil by direct atmospheric
distillation and by catalytic cracking of heavy residues. There are two types of Naphtha
marketed namely, High Aromatic Naphtha (HAN) and Low Aromatic Naphtha (LAN)
known as Naphtha (Petrochemical). Naphtha essentially consists of paraffin, naphthenic
and aromatic Hydrocarbons. The presence of Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Naphtha is very
critical especially when it is used in fertilizer plants. In fact, the design of a fertilizer plant
may entirely depend upon the composition of Naphtha available or a refinery has to
produce Naphtha according to the needs and specifications demanded by a fertilizer
plant. This is one of the reasons that IS Specifications for Naphtha has been withdrawn.
Naphtha is used as a fuel in fertilizer plant reformers where high temperatures are
required. It is also used as a fuel for steam generation in the plants where reforming is
done with the help of steam. Some gas turbines for power generation have also been
installed recently which will require Naphtha as fuel.

1.2 HYDROTREATING OF NAPHTHA


Hydrotreating processing is commonly used to remove Platforming catalyst poisons from
straight run or cracked naphthas prior to charging to the Platforming Process unit. It can
be seen that the primary function of the naphtha Hydrotreating Process can be
characterized as a Clean up Operation. The catalyst used 1n the Naphtha Hydrotreating
Process 1s composed of an alumina base impregnated with compounds of cobalt or nickel
and molybdenum. The catalyst is insensitive to most poisons which affect
dehydrogenation reactions. A relatively high percentage of carbon on the catalyst does
Hydrotreating of Naphtha

Chapter #1

Introduction

not materially affect its sensitivity or selectivity. Volumetric recoveries of products


depend on the sulfur and olefin contents, but usually are 100% + 2%
The Naphtha Hydrotreating Process 1s a catalytic refining process employing a selected
catalyst and a hydrogen-rich gas stream to decompose organic sulfur, oxygen and
nitrogen compounds contained in hydrocarbon fractions. In addition, hydrotreating
removes organo-metallic compounds and saturates olefinic compounds.
Organo-metallic compounds, notably arsenic and lead compounds, are known to be
permanent poisons to platinum catalysts. "The complete removal of these materials by
Hydrotreating processing gives longer catalyst life in the Platforming unit.
Sulfur, above a critical level, is a temporary poison to Platforming catalysts and causes an
unfavorable change 1n the product distribution. Organic nitrogen is also a temporary
poison to Platforming catalyst. It is an extremely potent one, however, and relatively
small amounts of nitrogen compounds in the Platformer feed can cause large deactivation
effects, as well as the deposition of ammonium chloride salts in the Platforming unit cold
sections.
Oxygen compounds are detrimental to the operation of a Platformer. Any oxygen
compounds which are not removed in the hydrotreater will be converted to water 1n the
Platforming unit, thus affecting the water/ chloride balance of the Platforming catalyst.
Large amounts of olefins contribute to increase coking of the Platforming catalyst. Also,
olefins can polymerize at Platforming operating conditions which can result in exchanger
and reactor fouling.
The Naphtha Hydrotreating Process makes a major contribution to the ease of operation
and economy of Platforming. Much greater flexibility is afforded in choice of allowable
charge stocks to the Platforming unit. Because this unit protects the Platforming catalyst,
it is important to maintain consistently good operation in the Hydrotreating Unit.
In addition to treating naphtha for Platformer feed, there are uses for the UOP Naphtha
Hydrotreating Process in other areas. Naphthas produced from thermal cracking
processes, such as delayed coking and visbreaking, are usually high in olefinic content
Hydrotreating of Naphtha

Chapter #1

Introduction

and other contaminants, and may not be stable in storage. These naphthas may be
hydrotreated to stabilize the olefins and to remove organic or metallic contaminants, thus
providing a marketable product.

1.3 PROCESS SELECTION


History:
Until the end of World War 2, there was little incentive for the oil industry to pay
significant attention to improving product quality by hydrogen treatment.
However, soon after the war the production of high sulphur crudes increased
significantly, which gave a more stringent demand on the product blending flexibility of
refineries, and the marketing specifications for the products became tighter, largely due to
environmental considerations.
Furthermore, the catalyst used in the Platforming process can only handle sulfur in the
very low ppm level, so hydrotreating of naphtha became a must. The necessity for
hydrotreating of middle distillates (kerosene/gas oil) originates from pressure to reduce
sulfur emissions into the environment. Overall, this situation resulted in an increased
necessity for high sulphur removal capability in many refineries.

REFINING PROCESSES
Today's refinery is a complex combination of interdependent processes. These processes
can be divided into three basic categories:
a. Separation processes
The feed to these processes is separated into two or more components based on some
physical property, usually boiling point. These processes do not otherwise change the
feedstock. The most common separation process in the refinery is distillation.

Hydrotreating of Naphtha

Chapter #1

Introduction

b. Upgrading processes
These processes improve the quality of a material by using chemical reactions to remove
any compounds present in trace amounts that give the material the undesired quality.
Otherwise, the bulk properties of the feedstock are not changed. The most commonly
used upgrading processes for jet fuel are sweetening, hydrotreating, and clay treatment.
c. Conversion processes
These processes fundamentally change the molecular structure of the feedstock, usually
by "cracking" large molecules into small ones, for example, catalytic cracking and
hydrocracking
Here we are concerned with upgrading processes for petroleum

UPGRADING PROCESSES
Sweetening processes remove a particular class of sulfur-containing compounds called
mercaptans from jet fuel. Mercaptans are undesirable because they are corrosive and also
because of their offensive odor.
Processes for merceptans removal:
Several processes have been developed to remove mercaptans by converting them to
disulfides. These disulfides are not corrosive and their odors are not as strong as the
mercaptans they replace. Sodium plumbite and copper chloride have been used as
catalysts for this conversion in the past.
Merox Process:

In recent years, the Merox (mercaptan oxidation) process, which uses a cobalt-

based catalyst, has almost completely replaced the older technologies.

Most of these chemical sweetening processes do not change the total sulfur

content of the fuel; they merely convert sulfur from one chemical form to another.

Hydrotreating of Naphtha

Chapter #1

Introduction

Some versions of the Merox process extract the disulfides that are formed and

thus lower the total sulfur content

Hydrotreating Process:
The objective of the Hydrotreating processes is to remove sulfur as well as other
unwanted compounds, e.g. unsaturated hydrocarbons, nitrogen, oxygen, organo-metallic
compounds from refinery process streams. It is catalytic hydrogenation process with very
high efficiency, even some plants remove sulphur up to 0.2ppm.
A main representative reaction is shown as under.

PROCESSES FOR HYDROTREATING


For Hydrotreating, two basic processes are applied,
1.

The liquid phase (or trickle flow) process for kerosene and heavier

straight-run and cracked distillates up to vacuum gas oil


2.

Vapor phase process for light straight-run and cracked fractions.

Both processes use the same basic configuration: the feedstock is mixed with hydrogenrich make up gas and recycle gas.
The mixture is heated by heat exchange with reactor effluent and by a furnace and it
enters a reactor loaded with catalyst, in the reactor, the sulphur and nitrogen compounds
present in the feedstock are converted into hydrogen sulphide and ammonia respectively.
The olefins present are saturated with hydrogen to become di-olefins and part of the
Hydrotreating of Naphtha

Chapter #1

Introduction

aromatics will be hydrogenated. If all aromatics need to be hydrogenated, a higher


pressure is needed in the reactor compared to the conventional operating mode. The
reactor operates at temperatures in the range of 300-380 0C and at a pressure of 10-20
bars for naphtha and kero, as compared with 30-50 bar for gas oil, with excess hydrogen
supplied. The temperature should not exceed 380 0C, as above this temperature cracking
reactions can occur, which deteriorates the color of the final product.
The reaction products leave the reactor and, after having been cooled to a low
temperature, typically 40-50 0C, enter a liquid/gas separation stage.
The hydrogen-rich gas from the high pressure separation is recycled to combine with the
feedstock, and the low pressure off-gas stream rich in hydrogen Sulphide is sent to a gastreating unit, where hydrogen Sulphide is removed.
The clean gas is then suitable as fuel for the refinery furnaces. The liquid stream is the
product from hydrotreating. It is normally sent to a stripping column where H 2S and other
undesirable components are removed, and finally, in cases where steam is used for
stripping, the product is sent to a vacuum drier for removal of water. Some refiners use a
salt dryer instead of a vacuum drier to remove the water.
The catalyst used is normally cobalt, molybdenum and nickel finely distributed on
alumina extrudates. It slowly becomes choked by coke and must be renewed at regular
intervals (typically 2-3 years). It can be regenerated (by burning off the coke) and reused
typically once or twice before the breakdown of the support's porous structure
unacceptably reduces its activity.

Hydrotreating of Naphtha

Chapter #1

Introduction

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HYDROTREATING AND


HYDRODESULPHURIZATION:

A hyrotreater and a hydrodesulphuriser are basically the same process but

A hydrotreater termed is used for treating kerosene or lighter feedstock

A hydrodesulphuriser mainly refers to gas oil treating.

The hydrotreating process is used in every major refinery and is therefore also

termed as the work horse of the refinery as it is the hydrotreater unit that ensures several
significant product quality specifications.

In most countries the Diesel produced is hydrodesulphuriser before its sold.

Sulphur specifications are getting more and more stringent. In Asia, countries such as
Thailand, Singapore and Hong Kong already have a 0.05%S specification and large
hydrodesulphurization units are required to meet such specs.
The by-products obtained from HDT/HDS are light ends formed from small amounts of
cracking and these products are used in the refinery fuel gas pool. The other main byproduct is Hydrogen Sulphide which is oxidized to sulphur and sold to the chemical
industry for further processing.

In combination with temperature, the pressure level (or rather the partial pressure

of hydrogen) generally determines the types of components that can be removed and also
determines the working life of the catalyst. At higher (partial) pressures, the
desulphurization process is 'easier', however, the unit becomes more expensive for
instance due to larger compressors and heavier reactors. Also, at higher pressure, the
hydrogen consumption of the unit increases, which can be a significant cost factor for the
refinery. The minimum pressure required typically goes up with the required severity of
the unit, i.e. the heavier the feedstock, or the lower levels of sulphur in product required.

Hydrotreating of Naphtha

Chapter #1

Introduction

1.4 APPLICATIONS OF HYDROTREATING PROCESS:


A more recent development is the application of Hydrotreating for pretreatment of
feedstock for the catalytic cracking process. By utilization of a suitable hydrogenationpromoting catalyst for conversion of aromatics and nitrogen in potential feedstock, and
selection of severe operating conditions, hydrogen is taken up by the aromatic molecules.
The increased hydrogen content of the feedstock obtained by this treatment leads to
significant conversion advantages in subsequent catalytic cracking, and higher yield of
light products can be achieved.
Hydrotreating can also be used for kerosene smoke point improvement (SPI). It closely
resembles the conventional Hydrotreating Process however an aromatic hydrogenation
catalyst consisting of noble metals on a special carrier is used. The reactor operates at
pressure range of 50-70 bar and temperatures of 260-320 0C. To restrict temperature rise
due to the highly exothermic aromatics conversion reactions, quench oil is applied
between the catalysts beds. The catalyst used is very sensitive to traces of sulphur and
nitrogen in the feedstock and therefore pretreatment is normally applied in a conventional
hydrotreater before kerosene is introduced into the SPI unit. The main objective of
Smoke Point Improvement is improvement in burning characteristics as the kerosene
aromatics are converted to naphthenes.
Hydrotreating is also used for production of feedstock for summarization unit from
paralysis gasoline (pygas) which is one of the byproducts of steam cracking of
hydrocarbon fractions such as naphtha and gas oil.

CONCLUSION
It is obvious from economical data of many commercial Plants that the fixed Capital
Investment on Merox sweetening Process is 90% less then Hydrotreating and the
operating Cost is almost 95% less then Hydrotreating, But the efficiency of Hydrotreating
Units are normally above 99% which cannot be achieved by Merox process, the feed

Hydrotreating of Naphtha

Chapter #1

Introduction

quality requirements of Platformer Section cannot be fulfilled by Merox Process. Further


more hydrotreating also removes many other impurities and saturated some olefins as
well. This is why; Hydrotreating Process is employed as feed preparation unit, where ever
Platformer Plant is to be installed.

CHAPTER 2

Hydrotreating of Naphtha

Chapter #1

Introduction

DESCRIPTION OF PROCESS FLOW


2.1

PROCESS DESCRIPTION

A typical Naphtha Hydrotreating unit processing a straight run naphtha for Platfonner
feed will have a reactor section and a stripper 'section. In addition, some units have a
prefractionation section upstream of the reactor section.
A. Prefractionation Section
In some special applications, it is desirable to produce a narrow boiling range naphtha cut
for feed to a Platformer. An example of this would be an operation aimed at making
aromatics, where the end point of the feed to the Platformer is limited to about 160C
(325F) to concentrate aromatic precursors in the feed. A full boiling range naphtha cut
from the crude unit could be processed through a prefractionation section to accomplish
this task.
The prefractionation section typically consists of two fraction-action columns in series,
with the overhead of the second (rerun) column being the heart cut for processing in the
reactor section of the hydrotreater. The heart cut boiling range is controlled by the amount
of light naphtha taken overhead in the prefractionation column and by the amount of
heart cut taken overhead in the rerun column. For example, if a 38-204C (100-400F)
boiling range naphtha is charged to a prefractionation section, the overhead temperature
controller of the first column sets the amount of overhead product, and increasing the
overhead temperature will increase the endpoint and quantity of the overhead product.
This cut is what controls the initial boiling point of the heart cut.
The prefractionator column bottom is charged to the second (rerun) column, where the
desired product is taken overhead, again controlled by an overhead temperature
controller. Increasing the overhead temperature will increase the amount of material taken
overhead and will increase its endpoint. Thus, if a heart cut of 82-174C (180-345F) is
desired, it can be obtained by adjusting the prefractionation column overhead/
temperature to set the initial boiling point, and the rerun column overhead temperature to
Hydrotreating of Naphtha

10

Chapter #1

Introduction

set the endpoint.


Usually, the feed to the prefractionator will be heat exchanged with rerun column
bottoms, and a steam heater can be used to provide the remaining heat that is required.
The prefractionator bottom is normally pumped directly to the rerun column without any
reheat. Both columns have reboilers to provide the heat necessary for vaporization of
naphtha so that sufficient reflux can be maintained. The overhead product from the
prefractionator and the rerun bottoms product are sent to storage for blending or further
processing downstream units. A typical prefractionation flow scheme 1s depicted in
Figure IV-1.
B. Reactor Section
Naphtha feed can enter the unit either from intermediate storage or from another process
unit. In the case of feed from storage, the tank must be properly gas blanketed to prevent
oxygen from being dissolved 1n the naphtha. Even trace quantities of oxygen and/or
olefin in the feed can cause polymerization of olefins in the storage tank when stored for
long periods or in the combined feed/reactor effluent exchangers if the feed is not
prestripped. 'This results in fouling and a loss of heat transfer efficiency.
Naphtha feed from the charge pump combines with a-hydrogen-rich gas stream, and this
combined feed enters the combined feed/ reactor effluent exchangers, where the feed is
heated and the reactor effluent is cooled. The combined feed leaving the exchanger 1s all
vapor, and flows to the ch_aj2ge_jTe^tej^here it is heated to the required reaction
temperature. The amount of fuel burned in the heater is controlled by the temperature of
the combined feed leaving the heater and flowing to the reactor. Most reactors are
designed for down flow operation, and contain/ sufficient catalyst to remove
contaminants to the level required.
The reactor effluent flows through the combined feed/reactor effluent exchanger, usually
on the tube side, and then to the product condenser. A water wash injection point is
provided in the reactor effluent line to the product condenser so that any salt buildup in
the line or condenser may be washed out. Reactor effluent flows out of the condenser at a

Hydrotreating of Naphtha

11

Chapter #1

Introduction

low enough temperature to ensure complete recovery of the naphtha and enters the
product separator. A mesh blanket coalescer is provided in the separator to ensure
complete separation of gas, hydrocarbon liquid, and water. The product separator is also
provided with a water boot to collect the water injected for salt removal. This water is
usually pressured to a sour water stripper for disposal.
There are alternate methods for providing the required hydrogen-rich gas to the reactor.
Most common is a recycle gas compressor taking suction from the top of the product
separator with the discharge joining the naphtha feed upstream of the combined
feed/reactor effluent exchanger. Since the process consumes hydrogen, a hydrogen-rich
gas stream is brought into the unit as makeup just upstream of the product condenser.
This stream is controlled by the product separator pressure controller, allowing gas to
enter and hold a constant separator pressure. This flow scheme is depicted in Figure IV-2.
In some units, rather than having a recycle gas compressor, a comparable amount of a
hydrogen-rich gas stream is brought Into the unit on flow control, and flows on a oncethrough basis through the reactor section to the product separator where it is vented ''on
pressure control. This flow scheme is depicted in Figure IV-3.
The choice between these two flow schemes is made during the design of each unit based
upon the availability of a high pressure hydrogen-rich gas stream, and the cost of
compression for each stream.
Stripping Section
The liquid hydrocarbon in the separator is pressured on level control through the stripper
feed/bottoms exchanger, and thus heated enters near the top of the stripper. A reboiler is
provided to supply the required heat input for generating vapor. This vapor strips
hydrogen sulfide, water, light hydrocarbons and dissolved hydrogen from the feed to the
stripper, which then passes overhead to the overhead condenser and to the overhead
receiver. Normally, no net overhead liquid product is produced, and all of the liquid in the
receiver is pumped back to the stripper as reflux. A reflux/feed ratio of approximately
0.25 is sufficient to strip the light ends and water from the tower. The reflux is pumped

Hydrotreating of Naphtha

12

Chapter #1

Introduction

into the stripper on receiver level control. To increase the amount of reflux, the reboiler
heat Input must be Increased to provide more overhead material. The net overhead gas
leaves the receiver on pressure control, usually to amine scrubbing and then to fuel gas.
The stripper overhead system is equipped with inhibitor addition facilities to prevent
corrosion of the process lines and equipment by the hydrogen sulfide in the overhead
vapor. The corrosion inhibitor is pumped directly from a drum, diluted with a small'
slipstream of reflux, and injected directly into the overhead vapor line at the top of the
stripper.
The stripper bottoms material is pumped through the feed/bottoms exchanger and usually
is charged directly to the Plat forming unit. On many units, a small slipstream of stripper
bottoms is further cooled in a trim cooler and sent to storage for later use as sweet startup
naphtha. This flow scheme is depicted in Figure IV-4.
The dry, stripped naphtha hydrotreating unit product must meet the following
specifications to be acceptable as Plat former feed:
Total Sulfur, wt-ppm 0.5 max.
Total Nitrogen, wt-ppm

0.5 max.

EP, F 400 max.


*Lead, wt-ppb <20 max.
*Arsen1c, wt-ppb

1 max.

*Iron + Chloride, wt-ppm

1 max.

*Copper + Heavy Metals, wt-ppb

<25 max.

Additionally, water plus total oxygen must be low enough to produce less than 5 mole
ppm water in the Platformer Recycle Gas with no water injection to that unit.

2.2

CHEMISTRY
Hydrotreating of Naphtha

13

Chapter #1

Introduction

As previously stated, the main purpose of the Naphtha Hydrotreating Process is to "cleanup" a naphtha fraction so that it is suitable as charge to a Platforming unit. There are six
basic types of reactions that occur in the hydrotreating unit.
A. Reactions
1.

Conversion of organic sulfur compounds to hydrogen sulfide

2.

Conversion of organic nitrogen compounds to ammonia

3.

Conversion of organic oxygen compounds to water

4.

Saturation of olefins

5.

Conversion of organic halides to hydrogen halides

6.

Removal of organo-metallic compounds

B,

Discussion

1.

Sulfur Removal

For bimetallic Platforming catalysts, the feed naphtha must contain less than 0.5 weight
ppm sulfur to optimize the selectivity and stability characteristics of the catalyst. In
general, sulfur removal in the hydrotreating process is relatively easy, and for the best
operation of a Platformer, the hydrotreated naphtha sulfur content should be maintained
well below the 0.5 weight ppm maximum. Commercial operation at 0.2 weight ppm
sulfur or less in the hydrotreated naphtha is common.
Typical sulfur removal reactions are shown below.
a. (Mercaptan) C-C-C-C-C-C-SH + H2 >

C-C-C-C-C-C +H2S

b. (Sulfide) C-C-C-S-C-C-C t 2H?> 2 C-C-C + H2S


c.(Disulfide) C-C-C-S-S-C-C-C + 3H2> 2 C-C-C + 2
d.(Cyclic sulfide) C - C-C + 2\\2 > C-C-C-C-C +

Hydrotreating of Naphtha

14

Chapter #1
C

e.
C

Introduction
C-C

(Thiophenic) C C-C + 4H2 > C-C-C-C-C + H2S


C-C

It is possible, however, to operate at too high a temperature for maximum sulfur removal.
Recombination of hydrogen sulfide with small amounts of olefins or olefin Intermediates
can then result, producing mercaptans in the product.
C-C-C-C = C-C + H2S> C-C-C-C-C -CIf this reaction is occurring, the reactor temperature must be lowered. Generally,
operation at 315-340C (600-645F) reactor Inlet temperature will give acceptable rates
of the desired hydrogenation reactions and will not result in a significant amount of
olefin/hydrogen sulfide recombination. This temperature is dependent upon feedstock
composition, operating pressure, and LHSV.
2.

Nitrogen Removal

Nitrogen removal is considerably more difficult than sulfur* removal in naphtha


hydrotreating. The rate of denitrification is only' about one-fifth the rate of
desulphurization. Most straight run naphtha contain much less nitrogen than sulfur, but
attention must be given to ensure that the feed naphtha to a bimetallic Platforming
catalyst contains a maximum of 0.5 weight ppm nitrogen and normally much less. Any
organic nitrogen that does enter the Platformer will react to ammonia and further with the
chloride in the recycle gas and form ammonium chloride. The ammonium chloride then
deposits in the recycle gas circuit or stabilizer overhead system. This problem can be very
annoying and time consuming, but it can be avoided or minimized by maximizing
nitrogen removal in the Naphtha Hydrotreating unit. Nitrogen removal is much more
important when a Naphtha Hydrotreating unit processes some cracked naphtha, since
these feed stocks normally contain much more nitrogen than a straight run naphtha. The
ammonia formed in the denitrification reactions, detailed below, is subsequently removed
in the hydrotreater reactor effluent wash water.

Hydrotreating of Naphtha

15

Chapter #1

Introduction

5. Halide Removal
Organic halides can be decomposed 1n the Naphtha Hydrotreating Unit to the
corresponding hydrogen halide, which is either absorbed In the reactor effluent water
wash or taken overhead in the stripper gas. Decomposition of organic halides is much
more difficult than desulphurization. Maximum organic halide" removal is thought to be
about 90 percent, but is much less at operating conditions set for sulfur and nitrogen
removal only. For this reason, periodic analysis of the hydrotreated naphtha for chloride
content should be made, since this chloride level must be used to set the proper
Platformer chloride injection rate. A typical organic chloride decomposition reaction is
shown below.
C-C-C-C-C-C-C1 H2 > HC1 + C-C-C-C-C-C
6. Metal Removal
Most metallic impurities occur at the part per billion (ppb) levels in naphtha. The UOP
Hydrobon catalyst is capable of removing these materials at fairly high concentrations, up
to 5 weight ppm or more, on an intermittent basis at normal operating conditions. Most
metallic Impurities are permanently deposited on the catalyst when removed from the
naphtha. The catalyst loses activity for sulfur removal as higher metal loadings are
reached. Some commonly detected components found on used Hydrobon catalyst are
arsenic, iron, calcium, magnesium, phosphorous, lead, silicon, copper, and sodium.
Removal of metals from the feed normally occurs in plug flow with respect to the catalyst
bed. Iron is found concentrated at the top of catalyst beds as iron sulfides. Arsenic, even
though it is rarely found in excess of 1 weight ppb in straight run naphtha's, is of major
importance, because it is a potent Platinum poison. Arsenic levels of 3 weight percent and
higher have been detected on used Hydrobon catalysts that retain their activity for sulfur
removal / Contamination of storage facilities by leaded gasoline and reprocessing of
leaded gasoline in crude towers are the common sources of lead on used Hydrobon
catalysts. Sodium, calcium and magnesium are apparently due to contact of the feed with
salt water or additives. Improper use of additives to protect fractionators overhead

Hydrotreating of Naphtha

16

Chapter #1

Introduction

systems from corrosion or to control foaming account for the presence of phosphorus and
silicon.
Removal of metals is essentially complete above temperatures of 315C (600F) up to a
total metal loading of about 2-3 weight percent on the catalyst:. Above this level, the
catalyst begins approaching the equilibrium saturation level rapidly, and metal
breakthrough is likely to occur. In this regard, mechanical problems inside the reactor,
such as channeling, are especially bad since these results in a substantial overload on a
small portion of the catalyst in the reactor.
I.e Reaction Rates and Heats of Reaction
The approximate relative reaction rates for the three major reaction types are:
Desulphurization

100

Olefin Saturation

80

Denitrification

20

The approximate heats of reaction (1n kJ per kg of feed per cubic meter of hydrogen
consumed) and relative heats of reaction are:
Heat of Reaction

Relative Heat of "Reaction

Desulphurization

8.1

Olefin Saturation

40.6

Denitrification

0.8

0.1

As can be seen from the above summary, desulphurization is the most rapid reaction
taking place, but it is the saturation of olefins which generates the greatest amount of
heat. Certainly, as the feed sulfur level increases, the heat of reaction also increases.
However, for most of the feedstock processed, the heat of reaction will just about balance
the reactor heat loss, such that the Naphtha Hydrotreating reactor inlet and outlet
temperatures are essentially equal. Conversion of organic chlorides and oxygenated

Hydrotreating of Naphtha

17

Chapter #1

Introduction

compounds are about as difficult as denitrification. Consequently, more severe operating


conditions must be used when these compounds are present.
The following table summarizes the physical properties of UOP Hydrobon catalysts.
TABLE I
UOP HYDROBON CATALYSTS FOR NAPHTHA HYDROTREATING SERVICE
Designator

S-6*

S-9*

S-12

S-15

S-16 /

Base
Form
Size

Alumina
Sphere
1/16"

Alumina
Sphere
1/16"

Alumina
Extrudate
1/16"

Alumina
Extrudate
1/16"

Alumina
Extrudate
1/16"

ABD
ABD
(lbs/ft3)

36

38

45

45

45

Lbs/Drum

250

275

300

325

300

Metals:

Ni

N1

Ni

Mo

Mo

Regeneration:

Mo

Mo

Mo

Co

Co

Co

Steam/

Steam/

Inert

Inert

Inert

A1r

A1r

Gas

Gas

Gas

*Also available In 1/8" spheres designated as S-6 (L) and S-9(L).

2.3

PROCESS VARIABLES

A. Reactor Pressure
The unit pressure is dependent on catalyst life required and feed stock properties. At
higher reactor pressures, the catalyst is generally effective for a longer time and reactions

Hydrotreating of Naphtha

18

Chapter #1

Introduction

are brought to a greater degree of completion. For straight run naphtha desulphurization,
20 to 35 kg/cm2g (300 to 500 psig) reactor pressure is normally used, although design
pressure can be higher if feed nitrogen and/or sulfur contents are higher than normal.
Cracked naphtha contain substantially more nitrogen and sulfur than straight run naphtha
and consequently require higher processing pressures, up to 55 kg/cm2g (800 psig).
Similarly, higher operating pressures are necessary to completely remove organic halides.
Halide contamination of naphtha is usually sporadic in occurrence and is normally due to
contamination by crude oil well operators.
The selection of the operating pressure is influenced to a degree by the hydrogen to feed
ratio set in the design, since both of these parameters determine the hydrogen partial
pressure in the reactor. The hydrogen partial pressure can be increased by operation at a
higher ratio of gas to feed at the reactor inlet. The extent of substitution is limited by
economic considerations.
Most units have been designed so that the desulphurization and denitrification reactions
go substantially to completion well below the design reactor temperature, for the design
feedstock. Small variations in pressure or hydrogen gas rate in the unit will not cause
changes great enough to be reflected by significant differences in product quality.
B. Temperature
Temperature has a significant effect in promoting hydrotreating reactions. Its effect,
however, is slightly different for each of the ' reactions that occur. Desulphurization
increases as/ temperature 1s raised. The desulphurization reaction begins to take place at
temperatures even as low as 230C (450F) "With the rate of reaction increasing
markedly with temperature. Above 340C (650F) there are only slight increases in
further removal of sulfur compounds due to temperature.
The decomposition of chloride compounds in low concentrations (< 10 weight ppm) will
require about the same temperature as the sulfur compounds decomposition.
Olefin saturation behaves somewhat similarly to the desulphurization reaction with
respect to temperature, except that olefin removal may level off at a somewhat higher
Hydrotreating of Naphtha

19

Chapter #1

Introduction

temperature. Because this reaction is very exothermic, the olefin content of, the feed must
be monitored and perhaps limited to keep reactor peak temperature within an acceptable
temperature range.
At very high temperatures, an apparent equilibrium condition limits the degree of olefin
saturation. This may even cause the residual olefins in the product to be greater at higher
temperatures than would be the case at lower operating temperatures. In certain cases,
when processing a naphtha with a significant amount of light ends over fresh catalyst, S
can react with these olefins to form mercaptans. In such a case, lowering the reactor
temperature can eliminate residual olefins and thus mercaptan formation.
Decomposition of oxygen and nitrogen compounds requires a somewhat higher
temperature than desulphurization or olefin saturation, and the removal of these
compounds does not appear to level .off in the same way at elevated temperatures. Units
with significant levels pf nitrogen or oxygen must be designed for high pressure and low
LHSV to ensure complete conversion.
The demetalization reactions are not very dependent on temperature. Above 315C
(600F), metals removal is essentially complete. Below this temperature, there may be
some cases where all the metals will not be removed.
The .recommended minimum reactor inlet temperature to ensure a properly prepared
Platformer feed is 315C (600F). There are two factors which are important in
determining this minimum temperature; first, below the minimum temperature, reaction
rates for contaminant removal may be too low. Second, the temperature must be
maintained high enough to ensure that the combined feed (recycle or once-through gas
plus naphtha) to the charge heater is all vapor.
Normal reactor design temperatures for both straight run and cracked naphtha (SRN) are
399C (750F) maximum. "Actual operating temperatures will vary, depending upon the
feed type, from 285C (550F) to 285 C (650F). Cracked stocks may require processing
at higher temperatures because of the higher sulfur, nitrogen, and olefin contents. For
these feeds, the reactor delta T will be higher, 1n the range of 10-55C (20-100F).

Hydrotreating of Naphtha

20

Chapter #1

Introduction

As the catalyst ages, the product quality may degenerate, which may be corrected by
Increasing reactor inlet temperature. If increasing the temperature does not improve the
product quality, a regeneration or change of catalyst will be required, depending on the
history of the operation and catalyst state.
In addition to catalyst deterioration, scale and polymer formation at the top of the bed
may cause high reactor pressure drops which may result in reactor channeling. This may
be corrected by skimming the top of the catalyst bed; and/or unloading, screening and
reloading. High pressure drop problems should be/ corrected as soon as possible to
minimize the possibility of equipment damage and degradation of product quality
C. Feed Quality
For normal operation, daily changes in hydrotreater inlet temperature to accommodate
changes in feed quality should not be necessary. However, in some cases, such as when a
refinery is purchasing outside crude from widely different sources, the naphtha quality
may change significantly, and adjustment of reactor Inlet temperature may be necessary.
The final selection of reactor temperature should be based upon product quality. The
above relations of feed quality and temperature assume operation within the normal
temperature operating ranges given 1n the preceding section.
D. Hydrogen to Hydrocarbon Ratio
The minimum hydrogen to feed ratio (nm 3/m3 or SCFB) is dependent on hydrogen
consumption, feed characteristics, and desired product quality.
For straight run naphtha of moderate sulfur content, 40-75 nm 3/m3 (250-400 SCFB) is
normally required. Cracked naphtha must be processed at higher H2 ratios [up to 500
nm3/m3 (3000 SCFB)]. As feedstock varies between these limits, the hydrogen to feed
ratio is proportioned between the extremes.
Ratios above 500 nm3/m3 (3000 SCFB) do not contribute to the rate of reactions. The use
of low purity hydrogen as makeup gas is limited by economical operation of the recycle
compressor. Recycle gas with hydrogen sulfide contents up to 10X and with large
Hydrotreating of Naphtha

21

Chapter #1

Introduction

quantities of carbon monoxide and nitrogen are not harmful/ to the catalyst, again when
reasonable desulphurization is the only criterion. For nitrogen removal or complete'
sulfur removal, high hydrogen purity (70X minimum) is necessary, and CO may act as a
temporary catalyst poison. The prevention of excessive carbon accumulation on the
catalyst requires maintenance of a minimum H2 partial pressure, so impurities present in
the makeup gas require higher operating pressures.
Lower hydrogen to hydrocarbon ratios can be compensated for by increasing reactor inlet
temperature. The approximate relation for these variables is 10C (18F) higher reactor
temperature .requirement for a halving of the hydrogen/feed ratio. This rule assumes
operation above the minimum values of 315C (600F) reactor inlet temperature and 40
nm3/M3 (250 SCFB) hydrogen ratio. This relation is approximate, and it should again be
pointed out that product quality should dictate the actual reactor temperature utilized.
E. Space Velocity
The quantity of catalyst per unit of feed will depend upon feedstock properties, operating
conditions, and product quality required. The liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) is
defined as f ol1ows:
LHSV = volume of charge per hour volume of catalyst
With most charge stocks and product objectives, a simplified kinetic expression based on
sulfur and/or nitrogen removal determines the initial liquid hourly space velocity. This
initial value may be modified due to other considerations, such as size 'of unit, extended
first cycle catalyst service, abnormal levels of feed metals and requirements of other
processing units in the refinery flow scheme. Relative ease of conversion for Hydrobon
catalysts indicate that olefins react most easily sulfur compounds next, then nitrogen and
oxygen compounds. There is considerable overlap with several reactions occurring
simultaneously and to different degrees. Charge stock variability is so large that only
approximate ranges of space velocities can be indicated for the various feed types. SRN
is processed at 4-12 LHSV and cracked naphtha at 2-8 LHSV.
For daily changes in the LHSV, inlet temperature on the Naphtha Hydrotreating reactor
Hydrotreating of Naphtha

22

Chapter #1

Introduction

may be adjusted according to the equation below:


T2 = Ti - 45 in LHSVi

(for F) LHSV2

or
T2 = TI - 25 in LHSVi

(for C) LHSV2

Where T^ = required inlet reactor temperature at LHSVi T2 =

"

"

"

"

LHSV2

The above relation assumes operation between 4 and 12 LHSV and assumes that reactor
temperatures are within the limits discussed in Section II.
F.

Catalyst Protection, Aging, and Poisons

The process variables employed affect the catalyst life by their effect on the rate of
carbon deposition on the catalyst. There is a moderate buildup of carbon on the catalyst
during the initial days of operation, but the rate of increase in carbon level soon drops to a
very low figure under normal processing conditions. This desirable control of the carbonforming reactions is obtained by maintaining the proper hydrogen to hydrocarbon ratio
and by keeping the catalyst temperature at the proper level.
Temperature is a minor factor in respect to the hydrotreating catalyst life. A higher
catalyst temperature increases somewhat the rate of the carbon-forming reactions, with
other factors being equal. It must be remembered that a combination of high catalyst
temperatures and inadequate hydrogen is very injurious to the catalyst activity.
Catalyst deactivation Is measured by the decrease in relative effectiveness of the catalyst
at fixed processing conditions after a period of catalyst use.
The primary causes of catalyst deactivation are: 1. accumulation of coke on the active
sites, and 2. chemical combination of contaminants from the feedstock with the catalyst
components. In normal operation, a carbon level above 5 wt-% may be tolerated without
significant decrease in desulphurization although nitrogen removal ability may be
decreased.

Hydrotreating of Naphtha

23

Chapter #1

Introduction

Permanent loss of activity requiring catalyst replacement 1s usually caused by the gradual
accumulation of inorganic species picked up from the charge stock, makeup hydrogen or
effluent wash water. Examples of such contaminants are arsenic, lead, calcium, sodium,
silicon and phosphorus. Very low concentrations of these species, ppm and/or ppb, will
cause deactivation over a long period of service because buildup of deposits depends on
the integrated effect of both temperature and time. This effect is important in SRN
processing for Platformer feed.
Apparent catalyst deactivation may be caused by the accumulation of a deposit on top of
the catalyst bed. The flow pattern through the balance of the bed is disturbed and product
quality is diminished. This condition is easily remedied by skimming a portion of the
catalyst, screening and reloading, or replacing with fresh catalyst. The deposit is
generally iron sulfide,
Hydrobon catalysts exhibit a high tolerance for metals such as arsenic and lead. Total
metals content as high as 2 to 3 wt-% of the catalyst have been observed with the catalyst
still effective. However, if the calculated metals content of the catalyst is 0.5 wt-%, the
frequency of product analyses should be increased to prevent metal breakthrough to the
Platforming catalyst. Organic lead compounds are decomposed by Hydrobon catalysts
and for the most part deposit in the upper portion of the catalyst bed as lead sulfide.
Metals are not removed from the catalyst during regeneration. When the total metals
content of the catalyst starts to approach 1 to 2 wt-%, consideration should be given to
replacing the catalyst.
The only certain method of minimizing the effect of trace metal contaminants on the
catalyst is to limit their entry to the system. This is done by careful, conscientious feed
analysis and correcting the source of, or conditions, causing the presence of the metal
contaminant.
Dissolved oxygen, though not a catalyst poison, should be eliminated from the feed. With
oxygen in the feed, excessive fouling of equipment, particularly the feed-effluent
exchangers can occur.

Hydrotreating of Naphtha

24

Chapter #1

Introduction

Hydrotreating of Naphtha

25

Chapter #3

Material and Energy Balance

CHAPTER 3

MATERIAL AND ENERGY BALANCE


3.1

MATERIAL BALANCE

Basis
4000 Barrel of Naphtha per stream day to be Hydrotreated
Bbl/hr Hydrotreated

4000/24

166.66 bbl/hr

MW

109.7

Density

0.7424 kg/lit

So
Weight of Naphtha
=

166.66 bbl/hr 42/lbbb gallons 3.78 lt/1us gallon 0.7424kg/1lit


=

19539.18 kg/hr

42987 lbs/hr

For getting high %age desulphurization we take 400 SCF H2 Per bbl
(from literature)
So
Feed rate of H2

166.66 400

66664 scf/hr

Chapter #3
Taking H2 purity

Material and Energy Balance


=

0.712

(from analysis of fresh and recycle gas)


H2 lb moles

66664/379

175.9 lb mol

79.95 kg moles

79.95/.712

247.05 lb

As avg M.W of H2 Stream

10.02

So w.t. of H2 Stream

2475.44 lb

1125.2 kg

Total H2 Stream

Balance Around Heat Exchanger and furnace is same as same amount of combined feed
is entering and leaving that is
Wt of comb feed

42987 + 2475

45462 lbs/hr

20664.5 kg/hr

BALANCE AROUND REACTOR


As first we know how to calculate the chemical hydrogen consumption in the reactor.
As there are a number of reactions going on in reactor so the scientist have developed a
formula for calculation of chemical hydrogen consumption that is as follows.
The general formula for the chemical hydrogen consumption applicable to all feed stocks
can be written as

Chapter #3

Material and Energy Balance

(aS+bN+cB+E) % Wt H2 on feed where in:


S

Sulphur content in feed minus. Sulphur contents in product

Nitrogen contents as above

Br

Bromine number of fed g/100gm

extra consumption

a, b,c coefficient, depending on type of feed stokes


According to our feed specification
a

0.12 (coefficient accounts for desulphurization)

0.57 (coefficient accounts for denitrification)

0 (coefficient accounts for olefin saturation)

0.042 (coefficient accounts for extra consumption)

Wt% sulfur contents in feeds

0.10335%

Wt% sulfur contents in removed

.10335 0.9995

.1033

N2 contents in feed

0.001%

Wt% N2 contents removed from feeds

= 0.001 0.95

Extra Cons.

0.0095 % wt

0.042

Putting values in formula


= 0.12 0.1033 + 0.57 0.0095 + 0 + 0.042

Chapter #3

Material and Energy Balance


=

0.0598 wt % H2 on feed

0.0598
42987
100

25.71 lbs

11.68 kg/hr

0.1033 42987
100 32

1.388lbs

0.63 kg mol/hr

So
H2 Consumption

Lb moles H2S formed

The reactor effluents pass through H. exchanger & after this some amount of condensate
is added for removing salts coming with Naphtha and for dissolving some NH 3 which is
formed in reactor.
Water added

1750lbs

795.45 kg/hr

BALANCE AROUND SEPARATOR


In separator some gases streams are separated in gas phase and most of water added is
separated from boot (The remaining waters evaporated).
So
Combined reactor effluent in =

45462 lbs/hr

Water in

1750 lbs

Water out from boot

1736 lbs

Chapter #3

Material and Energy Balance

Gaseous stream out

1257 lbs

Naphtha out

44219 lbs/hr

BALANCE FOR STRIPPING SECTION


In stripping section the remainder gases ion naphtha are removed and hydrotreated
product is obtained
SO
Naphtha in

44219 lbs/hr

Gases out

1275 lbs/hr

Pure Naphtha out

44219-1275

42944 lbs/hr

19520 kg/hr

Detailed material balance is tabulated with Process flow sheet

3.2

ENERGY BALANCE

BALANCE AROUND EXCHANGER TRAIN E-110


Cold Side
Naphtha flow rate

42987 lb/hr

19539.18 kg/hr

H2 stream flow rate

1125.2 kg /hr

Naphtha + H2 Stream in at

120F = 49C

Heat Capacity of liquid Naphtha from (120F) 49C to 248.0 (4708.4F)

Chapter #3

Material and Energy Balance

Cp

(0.388+0.00045T)/(SP.G)

.388 0.00045 120 .388 0.00045 478





(0.7424)1 / 2
(0.7424)1 / 2



2

Cp1

0.605 Kcal/kgm (Equation might subject an error 4% up to)

Heat Capacity of H2 Stream


Taking molar weighted heat capacity and neglecting. Molar heat capacity departure from
weighted value
Cp2

0.745 k cal/kg

Heat capacity of Naphtha vapor for the range


=

(478.4F) 248C to (621F) 327.2C

Cpg

(4-Sp) (T+670)/(6450)

Cp

(4 .7424)(478.4 670) (4 .7424)(621 670)


2 6450

0.616 kcal/kg

Now calculating heat loads

Heat Requirements for heating liquid Naphtha up to boiling point


=

m Cp T

19539.18 .650 (248-49)

2352419.57 kcal/hr

Chapter #3

Material and Energy Balance

Latent heat requirements for vaporizing Naphtha


=

19539.18 98

1,914,839.64 kcal/hr

Hear requirements for superheating Naphtha Vapors up to 327.22C


=

m Cp T

19539.18 /616 (327.22-248)

953.502.60 kcal/hr

Heat Requirements for heating hydrogen gas stream from 49C 327.22C
=

m Cp T

1125.2 .745 (327.22-49)

233,224.59 kcal/hr

Total heat load of exchanger train E1


=

2352419.57 + 1914839.64 + 953502.6 + 233244.59


=

5,453,986.4 kcal/hr

5.5 109 cal/hr

Inlet stream at

374C

Overall Cp

0.715

Hot side

Chapter #3

Material and Energy Balance

Mass flow rate in

20664.2 kg/hr

Heats required to cool the reactor effluents up to condensation


Temp

mCp T

20664.2 0.715 0.715 (374-242)

1950287.19Kcal/hr

Latent heat of condensation = 19539.18 98


Neglecting pressure effects)
Change in

1914839.64 kcal/hr

Heat required to lower the temp of liquid naphtha + gaseous stream up to 115C.
For Naphtha

For H2 Stream

Total load

19539.18 .615 (242-110)

1586176 kcal/hr

1125.18 0.71 (242-110)

105453.74

1950287.19 + 1914839 + 15861756 +


=

5.5 109 cal/hr

BALANCE AROUND FURNACE E-120


Flow rate of Naphtha + H2 stream

19539.18 + 1125.2

20664.38 kg/hr

105453.74

Chapter #3
Feed in at

Material and Energy Balance


=

621F

327.2C

Over all Cp

0.715

Out Temp

696F

368.8C

m Cp T

20664.38 0.715 41.68C

615 954.65 kcal/hr

Heat Requirements in F1

BALANCE AROUND REACTOR R-130


Feed flow rate in

20664.38 kg/hr

Feed inlet Temp

368.8C

H2 Consumed in desulphurization reactions =


=

.12 0.1033 .19539.18

100
2

1.21 kg moles

Overall heat of reaction for H2 consumption in hydrosulphurization reaction


=

1100 kcal/kg mol

So
Heat evolved due to desulphurization=
=

1.21 11000
13310 kcal/hr

As Extra Consumption of H2 is assumed to be due to saturation of Aromatics

Chapter #3

Material and Energy Balance

So
H2 Extra consumption

0.042 19539.18

100
2

4.103 kg mol/hr

Heat evolved in Saturation of aromatics =

4.103 16000 kcal/kg mol

65651.64 kcal/hr

65651.64 + 13310

78961.64 kcal/hr

0.72 Kcal/kg

mCpT

Q/mCp

78961.64
20664.38 0.72

5.3C

368.8 + 5.3

374C

Total heat evolved

Cp
Temp rise in reactor

So reactor out let temp

BALANCE AROUND AIR COOLED HEAT EXCHANGER E-140


Inlet Temp

93.3C

Chapter #3

Material and Energy Balance

Outlet temp

60C

Heat load

mCp0.A T

( Subscript CpOA stands for Over all Heat capacity)

21460 0.62 (93.3-60)

443063 Kcal/hr

BALANCE AROUND TRIM COOLER E-150


Inlet temp

60C

Outlet Temp

43.3C

Heat load

mCp T

21460 0.618 (60-433)

221480 kcal/hr

BALANCE AROUND
COLUMN FEED/EFFLUENT HEAT EXCHANGER E-185
Inlet temp

43.3C

Outlet temp

173.9C

Heat load

mCp0.AT

20098 (173.9-43.3) (0.626)

1643156.7 kcal/hr

BALANCE AROUND ACHE E-182

Chapter #3

Material and Energy Balance

Inlet Temp

151.66C

Outlet Temp

60C

Heat required for condensation of vapours =

4645 .95

441275 kcal/hr

Heat required to Fall the temps of combined mixture upto 60C


=

52250.62(151.66-60)

296932.5 Kcal/hr

441275 + 296932.5

7.38207 105 kcal/hr

Total load of ACHE

BALANCE AROUND TRIM COOLER E-183


Inlet temp

60C

Outlet temp

43.3C

Heat load

mCp0.A T

5225 0.618 (60-43.3)

53925.13 kcal/hr

Chapter #3

Material and Energy Balance

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

CHAPTER 4

EQUIPMENT DESIGN
4.1 SHELL AND TUBE HEAT EXCHANGER DESIGN
Introduction:
In the majority of chemical processes heat is either given out or absorbed, and fluids must
often be either heated or cooled in a wide range of plant such as furnaces, evaporators,
distillation units, dryers and reaction vessels.
The process of heat exchange between two fluids that are at a different temperature and
are separated by a solid wall occurs in many chemical engineering applications. And the
device used to implement this exchange is known as heat exchanger.

Definition:
The word exchanger really applies to all type of equipment in which heat is exchanged
but is often used specifically to denote equipment in which heat is exchanged between
two process fluids.
Such as:
Heaters And Coolers:
Exchangers in which a process fluid is heated or cooled by a plant service stream.
Vaporizer:
If the process stream is vaporized the exchanger is termed as a vaporizer.

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Reboiler:
If the stream is essentially completely vaporized then the exchanger is a reboiler. It is
associated with a distillation column.
Evaporator:
For the purpose of concentration of a solution the exchanger is called as an evaporator.
Fired exchanger:
It is used for exchangers heated by combustion gases, such as boilers.

Modes Of Heat Transfer


Heat transfer will take place in one or more of three different ways:
Conduction:
In a solid, the flow of heat by conduction is the result of the transfer of vibrational energy
from one molecule to another and in fluids it occurs in addition as a result of the transfer
of kinetic energy. Heat transfer by conduction may also arise from the movement of free
electrons.
Convection:
Heat transfer by convection arises from the mixing of elements of fluid. It occurs as a
result of actual mixing of hotter part of the fluid with the colder part of fluid due to
density variation caused by temperature difference. There are two type of convection:
(a)

Natural convection

when convective heat transfer is caused by temperature variation.


(b)

Force convection

when convective heat transfer is caused by temperature variation and some external

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

source for the mixing purpose.


Radiation:
All the bodies radiate thermal energy in the form of electromagnetic waves at a certain
temperature. These waves pass through vacuum and air and falls on a body then there are
three possibilities either they are:

Transmitted

Reflected

Absorbed

Depending upon the material upon which they fall. Only the absorbed radiations affect
the heat transfer.
In many of the applications of heat transfer in process plants, one or more of the
mechanisms of heat transfer may be involved. For example in the case of heat exchangers
heat passes through a series of different intervening layers before reaching the second
fluid.

TYPES OF HEAT EXCHANGERS:


Following are the ways of classification of heat exchangers:
(1)

According to transfer process:

1.

Direct contact type

2.

Indirect contact type


(a)

Direct transfer type

(b)

Storage type

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

(2)

According to surface compactness:

1.

Compact

2.

Non compact (Surface density < 700 m2/m3)

(3)

According to construction:

1.

Tubular

2.

3.

4.

(Surface density > = 700 m2/m3)

(a)

Double pipe

(b)

Shell And Tube

(c)

Spiral Plate

Plate
(a)

Gasketed

(b)

Spiral

(c)

Lamella

Extended Surface
(a)

Plate-Fin

(b)

Tube-Fin

Regenerative
(a)

Rotary

(b)

Fixed- matrix

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

(4)

According to Flow arrangement:

1.

Single Pass
(a)

Parallel Flow

(b)

Counter Flow

(c)

Cross Flow

2.

Multi Pass

(5)

According to Number of Fluids:

1.

Two-Fluid

2.

Three-Fluid

3.

n-Fluid(n >3)

(6)

According to Heat transfer mechanism flow arrangement:

1.

Single phase convection on both sides

2.

Single phase convection on one side, two phase convection on other side

3.

Two phase convection on both sides

4.

Radiation heat combined transfer convection

Principal Types Used in Chemical Industry:


The principle types of heat exchanger used in the chemical process and allied industries
are as follows:
1.

Double pipe exchangers

2.

Shell and tube exchangers

3.

Plate and frame exchangers

4.

Plate- Fin exchangers

5.

Spiral heat exchangers

Chapter #4
6.

Air cooled: coolers and condensers

7.

Direct contact: cooling and quenching

8.

Agitated Vessels

9.

Fired Heaters

Equipment Design

Selection of Heat Exchanger Type:


One of the more important actions taken by the design engineer in arriving at a
satisfactory solution for a specific heat exchange is the careful selection of the heat
exchanger type that should be used.
The selection process include a number of factors, all of which are related to the heat
transfer application. These are as:
1.

Thermal requirement

2.

Material Compatibility

3.

Operational maintenance

4.

Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations

5.

Availability

6.

Cost

In the chemical industry the preferred choice has been the shell and tube heat exchanger
due to the fact:
(1)

These exchangers give a large surface area in a small volume

(2)

Good mechanical layout

(3)

Uses well-established fabrication techniques

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

(4)

Can be constructed from a wide range of materials

(5)

Easily Cleaned

(6)

Well-established design procedures

(7)

More than one heat exchanger can be used in a parallel or series arrangement to

meet special heat transfer or physical requirements.


(8)

High thermal performance, even with fouled heat transfer fluids.

Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

___________________________________________
Tube Side Outlet
Temp=T2= 230
o
F=110oC

Tube Side Inlet


Temp= T1 = 323.6
o
F=162oC

Shell Side Inlet


Temp = t1=120.2
o
F=49 oC

Shell Side Outlet


Temp = t2 =219.2
o
F=104 oC

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Shell Side: (cold)

Tube Side: (hot)

Naphtha + H2

Reactor effluents

Temp of naphtha + H2 inlet

= t1 = 49 oC = 120.2 oF

Temp of naphtha + H2 outlet

= t2 = 104 oC = 219.2 oF

Total Pressure

= 451 psia = 30.68 atm

Temp of reactor effluents inlet

= T1 = 162oC = 323.6 oF

Temp of reactor effluents outlet

= T2 = 110oC = 230 oF

Flow rate of naphtha stream entering

= 42987 lb / hr

Flow rate of naphtha stream leaving

= 42987 lb / hr

Flow rate of reactor feed and effluent

= 2475 lb / hr

Designing Steps:
STEP 1
To Calculate Heat Duty Q:

For Exchanger E-1:


For naphtha

= mCp T
= 42987 x 0.6 (219.2-120.2)
= 2553427.8 Btu / hr

For H2 Stream

= mCp T
= 2475 x 0.73 (219.2-120.2)
= 178868.25 Btu / hr

Total Heat Load (Q)

= 2553427.8+ 178868.25

Chapter #4

Equipment Design
= 2.74 x 106 Btu / hr

STEP 2
Assumed Overall Coefficient:
U = 50 Btu /hr ft2 oF
STEP 3
Log Mean Temperature Difference:
T1 T2
Tl m =
ln T1
T2
(T1 t2) - (T2 t2)
=
ln (T1 t2)
(T2 t1)
(323.6 219.2) - (230 120.2)
=
ln (323.6 219.2)
(230 120.2)
104.4 - 109.8
=
ln (104.4)
(109.8)
=

107 oF

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

For True Temperature Difference:


(T1 t2)
R =
(T2 t1)
323.6 230.0
=

= 0.94
219.2 120.2
(t2 t1)

S =
(T1 t1)
219.6 120.2
=

= 0.48
323.6 120.2

(Using Figure 12.19 for 1-shell 2-tube pass)


Ft = 0.86
Tm = Ft x Tl m
= 0.86 x 107
= 92.02 oF
STEP 4
Provisional Area:
As
Q = UA Tm
1
= (2.74 x 106) / (50 x 92.02)
= 496 ft2
= 55.1 m2

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

STEP 5
Heat Exchanger Specifications:
1 2 Pull Through Floating Head Type

Tubes
16BWG
Outside Dia 0D

= inch = 0.75 inch = 0.0625 ft = 0.0208

Inside Dia

1D

= 0.620 inch = 0.0516 ft (Table 10 Kern)

Length of Tubes L

= 12 ft = 3.65 m

Square pitch

= 1 inch = 0.0833 ft

Baffles:
25% cut horizontal segmental baffles
Area of single tube = (0.1623 x 12 x 30.48) / 100 = 0.1809m2
No. of tubes

= 55.1 / 0.1809= 304.8

(From nearest count table 9)


No. of Tubes = 324
For 2 pass

Bundle Dia:
Db = do (Nt / K1)1/n1
(From Table 12.4 Coulson)
For Square Pitch:

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

K1

0.156

N1

2.291

Db

0.0208 (324 / 0.156) 1/2.291

0.58 m

1.9 ft

Shell:
(From Fig 12.10)
Shell-bundle clearance:
C = shell inside dia bundle dia

0.093 m

Shell dia inside

0.093 + 0.58

0.673 m

(Ds)

= 0.31 ft

= 2.21 ft

Baffle Spacing (B):


B

=0.6 x shell dia


= 0.6 x 0.673
= 0.4 m = 1.31 ft

No of Baffles:
No. of Baffles = 3.65 / 0.4 = 9.1 9 Baffles
STEP 6
Physical Properties:
Average Temp Shell Side

= 169 oF

Average Temp Tube Side

= 276.8 oF

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

API Gravity

59

k for H2 in feed stream

0.122 Btu / lb ft2 oF

k H2 in leaving stream

0.135 Btu / lb ft2 oF

k for naphtha in feed stream

0.0858 Btu / lb ft2 oF

k for naphtha in leaving stream

0.0845 Btu / lb ft2 oF

Heat capacity of naphtha in feed stream

0.545 Btu / lb oF

Heat capacity of naphtha in leaving stream =

0.650 Btu / lb oF

Heat capacity of gases in feed stream

0.9 Btu / lb oF

Heat capacity of gases in leaving stream

1.025 Btu / lb oF

for H2 in feed

0.0099 cP

for H2 in product

0.011 cP

for naphtha in feed stream

0.3 cP

for naphtha in leaving stream

0.2 cP

Mean Properties: (Feed)


(i) Mean Heat Capacity
0.9314 x 2475 + 0.545 x 42987
C =
2475 +42987
= 0.61 Btu / lb oF
(ii) Mean Density
0.635 x 2475+ 46.325 x 42987
=
2475 +42987

Chapter #4

Equipment Design
=

43.958 lb / ft3

(iii) Mean Viscosity


0.0099 x 2475+ 0.3 x42987
=
2475+42987
=

0.285 c

0.6897 lb / ft hr.

(iv) Mean Thermal Conductivity


0.122 x 2347.88 + 0.0858 x 42987
k=
2347.88 +42987
0.087 Btu / lb ft2 oF

Mean Properties: (Product Stream)


(i) Mean Heat Capacity
0.0099 x 2475 + 0.3 x42944
=
2475 +42944
=

0.669 Btu / lb oF

(ii) Mean Density


1.74 x 2475+ 0.650 x 42944
=
2475 +42944
=

4309 lb / ft3

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

(iii) Mean Viscosity


0.011 x 2475 + 0.2 x 42944
=
2475 +42944
=

0.19 cP x 2.42

0.4598 lb / ft hr.

(iv) Mean (k)


0.027 Btu / lb ft2 oF
STEP 7
Over All Heat Transfer Coefficient:
Shell Side Calculations:
1.

Flow Area :
ID x C x B
as

=
PT

ID

= 0.673 m
= 0.673 x 3.281
= 2.2 ft.

= 1 0.75
= 0.25 inch.
= 0.0208 ft.

= 0.4 m

Chapter #4

Equipment Design
= 1.3124 ft
Pt

= 1 inch = 0.0833 ft.

as

2.2 x 0.0208 x 1.3124


0.0833
=
2.

0.72 ft2

Equivalent Dia.
For square pitch:
1.27
(Pt2 0.785 do2 )

De =
do

3.

do

= tube outside dia = 0.625 ft.

Pt

= 0.083 ft

De

= 0.078 ft

Mass Velocity
Gs

= Ws / as
= 45506.67 / 0.66
= 68949.5 lb/hr ft2

4.

Reynolds No
Re.s

De Gs /
0.078 x 68949.5

=
0.6897
= 7797.68

Chapter #4

5.

Equipment Design

jH Factor
From fig (28)
jH

6.

47

(c / k) 1/3

1.6475

Prandtl No
Pr

7.

Outside Heat Transfer Coefficient


ho

jH k (c / k) 1/3 ( / w)0.14
De

= 47 x (0.087/0.078) x 1.6475 x 1
ho

= 86.36 Btu/ hr. ft2 oF

Tube Side Calculations:


1.

Flow Area:
Nt at
at =
n
n

Nt

324

at

0.3302 in2 (From Table 10)

0.0021 ft2

Chapter #4

Equipment Design
324 x 0.0021
at

=
2
= 0.34 ft2

2.

De

= ID of tube
= 0.62 inches
= 0.0516 ft.

3.

Mass Velocity
Gt

= Wt / at
= 45506.67 / 0.34
= 133843.14 lb/hr ft2

4.

Reynolds No
Re.t

= De Gt /
0.0516 x 133843.14
=
0.4598
= 15020.2

5.

6.

jH Factor
jH

= 70

Pr

= (c / k) 1/3

Prandtl No

= 1.5228

Chapter #4
7.

Equipment Design

Inside Heat Transfer Coefficient


jH k (c / k) 1/3 ( / w)0.14
hi

=
De
= 70 x (0.087 / 0.0516) x 1.5228
= 179.7 Btu/ hr. ft2 oF

8.

Inside to Outside Heat Transfer Coefficient


hio

= hi x ID/OD
= 179.7 x (0.0516 / 0.0625)
= 148.36 Btu/ hr. ft2 oF

9.

Clean Overall Coefficient:


hio x ho
Uc=
hio + ho
148.36 x 82.69
=
148.36 + 82.69
12267.8
=
231.05
= 53.09 Btu/ hr. ft2 oF

Uc
10.

Corrected Overall Coefficient:


Q
Ud =
A x Tm
A

= Nt a L
= 324 x 0.1623 x 12
= 631.0 ft2

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

= 58.6 m2

Corrected Area
2.74 x 106
Ud =
631.0 x 92.02

= 47 Btu /hr. ft2 0F

Corrected Overall coefficient


Rd
11.

= 0.00243

Dirt Overall Coefficient:


Rd

Ud

Uc

Ud

48

STEP 8
Pressure Drop:
Shell Side Pressure Drop: ( Ps)
For single phase flow:
f Gs 2 Ds (N + 1)
Ps =
5.22 x 1010 De S s
Re.s

7797.68

from fig (29)

0.0023

0.642 m

2.11 ft.

N+1

10

De

0.078 ft.

Ds

Btu /hr. ft2 0F

Chapter #4

Equipment Design
s

0.7424

Gs

68949.5 lb / hr ft2
0.0023 x (68949.5) 2 x 2.11 x 10

Ps =

= 0.076 Psi
10

5.22 x 10 x 0.7424 x 0.078


For two phase flow: ( PTP)
PTP = lo2 x Plo
Where
lo2 = 1 + (Y2 1)[B xog (1 - xog) + xog2]
`

xg

= flow quality of liq phase


Or
mass flow rate of liq phase
=
total mass flow rate
42987
=
4.88
=

0.95
2

=
Y+ 1

0.25

2/2.25 1

8-1 = 7

lo2 = 1 + (72 1) [0.25 x 0.95 (1 0.95) + 0.952]


=

49 [0.01187 + 0.9025]
=

44.8

Chapter #4

Equipment Design
PTP =

44.8 x 0.076

3.42 Psi

Tube Side Pressure Drop: ( Pt)


For single phase flow:
f Gt 2 Ds Ln
Pt =
5.22 x 1010 De s t
Re.t

15020.2

from fig (26)

0.00025

12 ft.

De

0.0516 ft.

0.7424

Gt

133843.14 lb/hr ft2

0.00025 x 133843.142 x 12 x 2
Pt =
5.22 x 1010 x 0.0516 x 0.7424

=
4n

0.053 Psi
v2

Pr =
s

2g

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

From Fig (27)


V2

0.0023 x 46/144

7.3 x 10-4

2g

4 x 2 x 7.3 x 10-4
Pr =
0.7424
=

7.8 x 10-3

Pt + P r

0.053 + 0.0078

0.0608 psi

lo2

1 + (Y2 1)[B xog (1 - xog) + xog2]

lo2

1+ ( 72 1 )[ 0.25 x 0.95( 1- 0.95 ) + 0.952]

49 [ 0.001187 +0.9025 ]

44.8

lo2 x PT

44.8 x 0.0608

2.7

PT
PT

For two phase flow:

PTP

psi

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

SPECIFICATION SHEET
Identification:

Unit

Shell And Tube Heat Exchanger

Item No.

E-110-A

Type
Function:

1-2 Pull Through Floating Head

To heat the reactor feed

Operation:
Heat Duty Q

690480 kcal/hr

Heat Transfer Area A

58.6 m2
301.5 W/ m2. K

Uc

272.55 W/ m2. K

Ud
Rd

0.00243

Fluid Circulated
Flow Rates
Temperature

Shell Side
Naphtha + H2
20664.5 kg / hr
Inlet 49 oC

Tube Side
Naphtha + H2
20664.5 kg / hr
Inlet 162 oC

Pressure Drop
Material Of Construction
Specification

Outlet 104 oC
0.23 atm
Carbon Steel
I.D
0.67 m

Outlet 110 oC
0.18 atm
Carbon Steel
I.D
0.015 m

0.094 m

O.D

0.4 m

Pt

0.0253 m

3.65 m

Nt

324

0.019 m

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

4.2 FURNACES
Introduction:
Furnace is a device for generating the control heat with the objective of performing work.
Definition:
A furnace is an enclosed place in which heat is produced by the combustion of fuel, as for
reducing ores or melting metals, for warming a house, for baking pottery, etc. this is
drawn sufficiently wide terms to cover almost all heating operations. The range of
operation and the condition under which those processes must be carried out cover a very
wide field, and the types of furnaces are equally diverse; therefore, no attempt will be
made to describe or figure particular types of furnace.
Furnaces may operate over a range of temperature from 300 F or thereabouts, to upwards
of 3000 F and they may be intermittent or continuous in operation. The capacity may
vary from that of a small pot furnace used for the tempering steel springs, where a few
gallons of oil is heated to about 500 F to a blast furnace producing a thousand tons of pig
iron a day at a temperature of about 3000 F. The number of types are as great as the
number of heating operations, but most comprise a combustion chamber in which the fuel
is burned and a hearth (or its equivalent) on which the charge is heated.
The principle of fuel economy is the same in all furnaces, and involve
a) The complete combustion of fuel
b) The rejection of the products of combustion at the lowest practicable temperature
b) The reduction of external losses by means of suitable insulation
Types of Furnaces
However we have made an attempt to classify the furnaces so only the names are
indicated here, which also shows the purposes for which the furnaces are employed.

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

(1) Classification on the basis of fuel used


- Fuel heated furnaces
(a) Fuel and charge in contact
(1) Hearth furnaces

Without blast

With blast

(2) Shaft furnaces

Natural draught

Forced blast

(b) Charge heated by flame alone


(1) Reverberatory Furnace

Natural Draught

Forced Draught

(2) Rotary Furnace


(3) Sintering machines
(c) Closed Vessel Furnaces
Charge heated by conduction of heat through the walls of the vessel
(d) Charge containing its own fuel

Solid charge

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Liquid Charge

- Electrical furnaces
(2)Classification

on the basis of material heating

(a) Boiler furnace (To get steam from water)

Fire Tube Boiler

Water tube Boiler

Longitudinal Drum

Cross Drum Straight tubes

Cross Drum Bend tubes

(b) Refinery furnace (Crude oil cracking)

De Florez circular furnace

Box Type furnaces

Double Radiant section Box Type Furnace

Furnace with overhead convection bank

(c) Metallurgical furnaces


Metal Industries
The metallurgical furnaces are further classified on the basis of following purpose

For Tempering

For Annealing

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

For Carbonizing

For Forging

For Ensiling

(3)Classification on the basis of nature of transfer of heat


(a) Oven Furnaces
On the basis of method of firing Oven furnaces have four types

Direct Fired

Over Fired

Side Fired

Under Fired

(b) Muffle Furnace


(c) Liquid Bath Furnaces
(d) Recirculating type Furnace
(e) Radiant tube furnace
(4) Classification on the basis of material handling
(a) Batch furnaces
(b) Continuous furnaces
Fired Heaters
Introduction and operation:

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Most of the fired heaters used in the petroleum refinery and petrochemical and other
chemical plants is a pipe still heater, which is designed to heat process fluid in tubes
effectively by burning fuel. The function of the heater is similar to that of the steamgenerating boiler except that usually process fluid is heated instead of water.
Basically a pipe still heater consists of a combustion chamber for heat release, surrounded
by tubes through which the process feedstock flows to absorb heat by both radiation and
convection. Using a predetermined air mix ratio, the heat is supplied by the gas or oil
burners provided on the floor or on the walls of combustion chamber.
The feedstock is fed into and passed through tubes inside the heater. If a convection
section is provided, the feedstock is fed to the convection section first, then introduced
into the radiant section. During passage of the feedstock through the fired heater, it is
subjected to both radiant and convection heat.
The inside walls of the heater are refractory lined, to cope with the high temperatures
generated by the firing fuel.
The feed stock is heated to the required temperature at the specified phase and fed to the
next unit in the process sequence; e.g., distillation column, fractionators or reactor etc. the
temperature of the feed stock when leaving the fired heater differs according to the
operating requirements, but is generally with in a range of 250oC to 500oC.
The fired heaters most generally used are the box type and the vertical cylinder type.
Types of Fired Heaters
Fired heaters are classified by their construction and purpose. There are basically two
types of construction, the box type and the vertical cylinder type. These are further
divided by their tube layout, combustion method, purpose and characteristics. Although
there are many types of construction to meet process requirements
Purpose of fired heaters
1) Heating

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Raising the temperature of a liquid


Raising the temperature of a gas
Vaporizing a liquid
2) Thermal Cracking
Gas cracking
Liquid cracking
3) Thermal Reforming
Gas reforming
Heat Transfer
The purpose of a fired heater is to transfer heat to the process feedstock at a
predetermined temperature. This is accomplished by burning a fuel or gas, causing large
quantities of flue gas to enter the heater. The heat is transferred to the feedstock by
radiation, conduction and convection.
Heat Transfer in Fired Heaters
In the radiant section, the heat is transmitted to the tubes by heat radiation from the
burner flame and the heater walls. This heat is transferred to the feedstock by conduction
and convection. In the convection section, the heat is transmitted to the tubes by
convection of the hot flue gas and is then transferred to the feedstock by conduction and
convection Mechanical drafts are induced, forced or balanced. All the four draft methods
are used in fired heaters, although a natural draft is more generally applied.
Heater Components

Burners

The following types of burners are used for the combustion of oil or gas, or both in fired

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

heaters:
1) Premix gas burner
2) Non-Premix gas burner
3) Steam atomizing oil burner
4) Combination gas and oil burner
The burners are designed to produce a uniform flame suitable to the type of firebox
involved, together with the most efficient, safe and complete combustion of the fuel.

Refractory

The following kinds of refractories are used in fired heaters to protect the heater casing
(insulating materials) from hot flue gas:
1) Cast able (aluminum cement +aggregates)
2) Brick (fire bricks & insulation fire bricks)
3) Ceramic fiber (Al2O3 and SiO2)

Heating tube

Heating tube is a kind of container in which high temperature and high pressure process
feed stock is contained and receives the heat of combustion.
In some special heaters the tube metal temperature will be more then 8000C.
The material of heating tube is selected from among carbon steel, low alloy and high
alloy steel depending upon service temperature, corrosiveness of process feed stock and
others.
Generally the heating tube is classified into three types, that is, bare tube, finned tube and
studded tube.

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Tube Support

The tube support is literally, the component that supports the tubes.
Tube supports are usually of high alloy casting.

Auxiliary Equipment

There are some auxiliary equipment for fired heaters to achieve higher heater efficiency
and to keep the fired heater in proper condition.

Air Preheater

The flue gas at the exit of the fired heater still contains some available heat which is high
enough to heat the combustion air.
Air Preheater is a kind of heat exchanger and is designed to exchange the heat between
flue gas and combustion air efficiently.
With preheated combustion air the fuel quantity required can be reduced, since preheated
air has more heat than ambient air.
When the flue gas is cooled too much some trouble may occur in the air preheater
elements, fan elements and the refractories in the duct or stack, since flue gas generally
contains sulfur compounds.

Soot Blower

When fuel oil is used as a fuel, a large amount of ash, carbon etc. will be generated and
accumulate onto the convection heating tubes, resulting in low heat transfer.
Furnace Calculation
Step 1
Partial pressure of CO2 and H2O (P) is found from graph which is plotted against excess

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

air.
Step 2
Emmisivity is found from the graph, it is plotted against PL (product of partial pressure
and flame length) different curves for different temperatures.
Step 3
Exchange factor finally is found by graph, where it is plotted against ratio of refractory
area to cold plane area, (AR/a ACP), different curves for different emmisivities.
What is meant by design of a furnace?
When we talk about furnace design it means we want to find
1. Size require for the given heat duty
2. Number of tubes require
3. Arrangement of tubes
4. Flue gas temperature
5. Amounts of fuel air steam
Methods for designing
There is no universally applicable method for the furnace design for all types of the
furnaces specially fuel used determent the design method applicable , there are four
known design methods
1. Method of Lobo and Even
2. Method of Wilson Lobo and Hattel
3. The Orrak- Hudson equation

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

4. Wohlenberg Simplified Method


Here we shall consider only method of lobo and evans. This is a trial and error method
which make use of the overall exchange factor () and a Stefan-Boltzmann type equation.
It has a good theoretical basis and is used extensively in refinery furnace design work. It
is also recommended for oil or gas fired boilers.
As in all trial and error solutions, a starting point must be assumed and checked. For
orientation purposes, we shall estimate the number of tubes required in the radiant section
by assuming an average flux

( permissible average radiant rate ) Btu/(hr)(ft 2 of

circumferential tube area).


Here we have taken vertical tube cylindrical furnace
Furnace Design Calculation By Method Of Lobo And Evvans
1-Average radiant heat flux:
First of all we shall assume radiant heat flux. In literature, permissible average
radiant rate for different types of feedstocks are available.
From table 19.2 (Kern)
For naphtha hydro treating charge heater
Average radiant heat flux= 3000 Btu/(hr)(ft2 of circumferential tube area)
2-Find Q/Acp:
=2 x Average flux
=20x3000
=6000 Btu/(hr)(ft2 of circumferential tube area)
Where,

Chapter #4

Equipment Design
Acp= Equivalent cold plane surface (ft2)

= effectiveness factor
Acp=effective cold plane surface (ft2)
Q= heat transferred to cold surface (Btu/hr)
3- Overall exchange factor () :
Assume overall exchange factor. Normally it is in the range of 0.55 to 0.65
Here lets take = 0.57
4- Actual heat transfer between hot and cold surfaces:
Q/Acp = 6000/0.6
= 10000(Btu/ hr. ft2)
5- Tube surface temperature (Ts):
It is fixed depending upon the desired temperature of fluid in tubes.
Lets,

Ts=800 F

6- Evaluate temperature of the gases leaving the radiant section:


From fig. 19.14 (Kern)
Tg= 1140 F
Or by substituting Q/Acp and Ts in the following heat transfer equation
Q/Acp=0.173[(Tg/100) 4-(Ts/100) 4]+7(Tg-Ts)
Where, all the terms have usual meaning as described.

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

7- Heat balance:
Heat balance is necessary for the solution of heat absorption problem. The heat balance is
as follows:
Q = Qf + Qa + Qr + Qs Qw Qg
Where,
Q = total radiant section duty , (Btu/hr)
Qa =Sensible heat above 60F in combustion air, (Btu/hr)
Qf = Heat liberated by fuel, (Btu/hr)
Qr =sensible heat above 60F in recirculated flue gases, (Btu/hr)
Qs =Sensible heat above 60F in steam used for oil atomization, (Btu/hr)
Qw =Heat loss through furnace walls, (Btu/hr)
Qg =Heat leaving the furnace radiant section in the flue gases, (Btu/hr)
A- Total required heat duty (Q):
Q =2.3x 106 Btu/ hr

(from overall energy balance)

B- Efficiency of furnace ():


Suppose the overall efficiency of furnace == 0.70
C- Heat liberated by fuel (Qf):
Qf=Q/ = (2.3x106)/ 0.70
=3.28x106 Btu/hr.
D- Lower heating value of fuel (L.H.V):

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

We have taken refinery gases as fuel which are obtained during distillation , cracking and
other processing of petroleum and its fractions which contain paraffins (e.g. methane
ethane , propane and butane) olefins (e.g. ethylene, propene and butene) and hydrogen
are called refinery gases.

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

L.H.V of refinery gases = 20500 kcal/ Nm3


=20500x(1/0.252)x(22.4/1)x(1/2.2)
=828282.82 Btu / lb.mol.
E- Amount of fuel consumed (qf):
qf =Qf/L.H.V
=3.28x106/828282.82
=3.96 lb.mols. / hr.
as the composition of refinery gas is:
COMPONENTS

COMPOSITION %

LBS./LB.MOLS.

Propane

40

=0.4 x 44

17.6

Butane

30

=0.3 x 58

17.4

Ethane

10

=0.1 x 30

0.3

Methane

10

=0.1 x 16

1.6

Hydrogen

10

=0.1 x 2

0.2
=39.8

Lbs of fuel gas = qf =3.96x39.8 =157.6 lbs./ hr.


F- Sensible heat in combustion air (Qa):
(a)- evaluate lb. Air/ lb. Fuel for 20 %excess air
lb. Air / lb. Fuel = 20.67 ( from table 18-10 ( nelson))
(b)- evaluate air required (qa):
qa = qf x (lb.of air / lb.of fuel)
=157.6x20.67 = 3263.43 lbs. / hr.

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

(c)- air enter at ambient temperature = 77 F


enthalpy of air at this temperature = Ha = 10.78 Btu/lbs.
(d)-

Qa = qa x Ha
= 3263.43 x10.78
= 35179.8 Btu/ hr.

G- heat loss through wall ( Qw) :


Qw= 2% of Qf
=0.02 x3.28x 106
= 65714.28 Btu/ hr.
H- Sensible heat in steam (Qs):
Since it is a gas fuel , no steam is required for atomization , so
qs. = 0 lb.mols. / hr.
Qs = 0 lb.mols. / hr.
I - Heat in the flue gases (Qg):
Qg = Q(N2) +Q(O2) + Q(CO2) +Q(H2O)
a-

Mass flow rate of the flue gases


(qg) = qf +qa +qs
= 157.6 + 3263.43 + 0
= 3421.23 lbs.hr.
b- basis : 1 lb.mol. of fuel gases:

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

O2

Required

CO2 Produced (lb.mols)

H2O Produced

(lb.mols.)
(lb.mols.)
H2O + 0.5O2H2O

0.05

CH4+2 O22 H2O + CO2

0.2

0.1

0.2

C2H6+3.5 O22 H2O + CO2

0.35

0.2

0.3

C3H8+5 O23 CO2+4 H2O

1.2

1.6

C4H10+6.5 O24 CO2+5H2O

1.95

1.2

1.5

=4.55

=2.7

=3.7

0.1

As, Fuel gas required (qf) =3.9657 lb.mols.


O2 required = 4.55 (lb O2/ lb.mol. Fuel gas) x 3.965 (lb.mol fuel gas)
=18.044 lb.mols.
with 20% excess air O2 fed = 18.044x1.2
= 21.65 lb.mols.
N2 entered = (21.65 x 0.79)/ 0.21 = 81.45 lb.mols. = N2 leaving
O2 consumed = 18.044 lb.mols.
O2 unconverted = 21.65- 18.044 = 3.606 lb.mols. = O2 leaving
CO2 leaving = 2.7 x 3.9657 =10.707 lb.mols.
H2O leaving = 3.7x3.9657 = 14.67 lb.mols.

b-

enthalpies of flue gases as flue gas temperature :


COMPONENT OF FLUE GAS

ENTHALPY OF COMPONENT AT Tg (Btu/ lb.mol.)

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

N2

8004

O2

8427

CO2

12200

H2O

9602

So,
Q (N2) = 81.4x8004 = 651925.8 Btu/ hr.
Q (O2) = 3.606x8427 =8430.606 Btu/ hr.
Q (CO2) = 10.207x12200 =124525.4 Btu/ hr.
Q (H2O) = 14.67x9602=140861.34Btu/ hr.
Therefore,
Qg = Q(N2) +Q(O2) + Q(CO2) +Q(H2O)
= 925743.146 Btu/ hr.
So overall heat balance is:
Q = Qf + Qa + Qr + Qs Qw Qg
= 3.28 x 106 + 35179.8 + 0+0 - 65714.28 925743.146
= 2.3 x 106 Btu/ hr.

8- Establish the number and Sizes of tubes:


Fix tube length = l = 22 ft

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Fix outer diameter of tubes = 3.5 inch. = 3.5/12 ft.


Area of tubes = xDx l = x (3.5/12)x 22 = 20.158 ft.2
Heat transferred per tube = Average flux x surface area per tube
=3000x20.158
= 60444 Btu/ hr.
Number of tubes = total radiant section duty (Q)/ heat transferred per tube
= 2.3 x106 / 60444
= 38 tubes
9- Arrangement of the tubes:
Height of furnace = 23.5 ft
Center to center distance = (3.5+ 4) /12 = 0.625 ft
Tubes are vertically mounted in a single row along the wall of the cylindrical furnace
about one tube diameter away from wall.
Diameter of furnace (D) =(number of tubes x center to center distance)/
= (38x0.625)/ 3.14
= 8 ft.

Checking the performance of furnace


10- Evaluate effectiveness factor ():

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

For C-C distance / O.D = 2.3


& Arrangement of tubes is single row when only one is present
From fig 19.11 (kern)
= 0.79
11- Evaluate equivalent cold plan surface area (Acp):
Acp = (number of tubes)x (length of each tube) x (C-C distance)
= 38 x 22 x 0.625
= 523.21 ft2
So,
Acp. = 0.79 x 523.21
= 413.33 ft2
12- Evaluate the total area of furnace surface (At):
For cylindrical furnace,
At = xD xH
=3.14x8x23.5
= 590.32 ft2

13- Evaluate effective refractory surface (Ar):


Ar = At - Acp

Chapter #4

Equipment Design
= 590.32- 413.33
= 176.99 ft2

14- Evaluate (Ar/ Acp):


Ar/ Acp = 179.99/ 413.33
= 0.43 (this would be used to evaluate
exchange factor)
15- evaluate mean beam length (L):
It depends on the dimensions of the furnace & found from any suitable formula from
table (19.1)
Here, for cylindrical furnace whose dimensions are like Dx2D
L = 1x diameter of furnace (D)
= 1x8
= 8 ft
16- evaluate gas emissivity (g):
a-

Evaluate partial pressure of (CO2+ H2O)


At 20% excess air
p(CO2 + H2O) = 0.24 atm. from fig. 1-7 (Evans)

b-

Calculate pxL:
pL = p (CO2+ H2O) xL

Chapter #4

Equipment Design
= 0.24x8
=1.92 atm.ft.

c-

At pL =1.92 atm.ft. & Tg = 1140 F


g = 0.44

from fig (1-8) (Evans)

17- Evaluate Overall exchange Factor ():


at g = 0.44 & Ar/ Acp = 0.43
= 0.55 (from fig. 19.15 Kern)

18- CHECK:
Check of gas temperature (Tg) required to effect assumed duty on
assumed surface)
a-

Calculate Q/Acp using the above calculated value of


= 0.55
Q = 2.3e6
Acp. = 413.33 ft2
Q/Acp= 2.3e6 /(413.33x0.55)
= 10117.3 Btu/ hr. ft2
b- Evaluate Tg (actual) at calculated Q/Acp & Ts

Tg = 1170 F

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

So, trial indicates that less duty than 2.2 million Btu/ hr. is performed since this duty
does not cool the fuel gases to 1140 F but to only 1170 F , while the flux corresponding to
this duty could be effected by a gas temperature of 1140F.
In short as assumed Tg (1140 F) is quite different from calculated Tg (1170 F), so we
have to repeat the calculations by assuming another value of Tg.
SECOND TRIAL:
Suppose Tg = 1160

in step 6 (basically we have supposed = 0.57 in step 3 so

that Tg will come out to be 1160F after performing step 6)


Qf, Qa, Qw, will remain the same, only Qg (heat taken away by the flue gases) changed.
enthalpies of flue gases as flue gas temperature :

COMPONENT OF FLUE GAS

ENTHALPY OF COMPONENT AT Tg (Btu/ lb.mol.)

N2

8774

O2

9251

CO2

13470

H2O

10562

So,
Q (N2) = 81.4x8774 = 714203.6 Btu/ hr.
Q (O2) = 3.606x9251 =33359.1 Btu/ hr.
Q (CO2) = 10.207x13470 =137488.29 Btu/ hr.
Q (H2O) = 14.67x10562=154944.54 Btu/ hr.
Therefore,

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Qg = Q(N2) +Q(O2) + Q(CO2) +Q(H2O)


= 1039995.53 Btu/ hr.
So overall heat balance is:
Q = Qf + Qa + Qr + Qs Qw Qg
= 3.28x106 + 35179.8 + 0+0 - 65714.28 1039995.53
= 2.20 x 106 Btu/ hr.
So number of tubes:
Number of tubes Nt = total radiant section heat duty / heat transferred per tube
=(2.0x106 )/60444
=36
(In the previous trial, no of tubes were 38. as there is very small change in the no. of
tubes so we use the previous value (i.e. 38 ) to avoid the repetition of calculations)
Similarly assuming that does not change (actually it will fall slightly)
i.e.
(Calculated) = 0.55
so,
Q/Acp = 2.3e6 / (413.33x0.55)
= 101173.38 Btu/hr.ft.2

We have,

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Tg = 1155F (calculated)
Where as assumed Tg was 1160 that is close enough.
Circumferential flux = Q / (Dl) (Nt)
=(2.3x106 )/ (3.14x0.29x22x38)
= 3019 Btu/hr.ft2
As compared with the specified flux =3000 Btu/hr.ft2
Such a difference is negligible.
Final Results
Number of tubes = 38
Flue gas temperature = 1160F
Heat duty = 2300000 Btu / hr
Flux calculated 1 = 3019 Btu/ hr ft2
Dimension of furnace = 23.5 x 8
% Error = [(3000-3019) / (3000)]x 100 = 0.63 %

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

SPECIFICATION SHEET

Identification:
Unit
Item No.
Type
Function:

Furnace
E-120
Vertical Cylinderical

To heat the reactor feed

Operation:
2.42*109 J/hr

Heat Duty Q

Furnace
Combustion Gases

Fluid Circulated
Flow Rates
Temperature
Material Of Construction
Refractory material
Specification

Carbon Steel
Refractory Brick
Diameter 2.44 m
Height
B

6.55 m
0.4 m

Tube
Naphtha + H2
20664.5 kg / hr
Inlet 327 oC
Outlet 369 oC
Carbon Steel
L.T

6.096 m

O.D

0.088 m

C-C.Dis 0.1905 m

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

4.3 REACTOR
Types of Reactors
The most common types of Reactors are

1.

Fixed bed Reactor

2.

Fluidized bed Rector

3.

Stirrer tank Reactor

Fixed bed reactor can be further classified on the biases of either heat is supplied during
reaction or not.
o

Adiabatic

Non adiabatic

The reactions taking place within the reactor may be in gas phase or there might a case of
trickle operation.
For gas phase reactions some important reactor configurations are as under.
1.

Single adiabatic bed

2.

Radial flow

3.

Adiabatic beds in series with intermediate cooling or heating

4.

Direct-fired non-adiabatic

Except reactor type and configuration some other factors are important like , Distribution
system and Sporting ceramic balls which also serves for uniform distribution of flow as
well.
Our Reactor in this case is non isothermal adiabatic reactor with basket type distribution
system and standard ceramic balls installation . Detailed calculations of distribution
system is given in design calculations.

Chapter #4
REACTOR DESIGN CALCULATIONS

Equipment Design

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

PLANT SPECIFICATIONS
Feed rate

4000 bbl/std

Wt % S in Feed

= .10335

Wt % S in Product

= .00005

Operating Pressure

430 Psi =28.4atm

Operating Temperature

= 700 F

= 374oC

Pressure Drop maximum allowable = 10 Psi


Catalyst
Each pellet (dimention 1/8 inch = .3175 cm)
Area

2*.785*.31752 + .3175 .3175

.474cm2

Dp = diameter of a sphere of same surface = (.474 )1/ 2 = .388cm


Diameter of a sphere of same volume 2(/4)(0.31752)(0.3175)1/ 3
4/3

Outer surface / unit volume solid

0.388cm

0.474
(/4)(0.31743)

Volume of solid /cu ft bed is (1-e)

18.9 cm2 /cm3

0.6 cu ft

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Total Pellet surface in sq ft /cu ft bed

(0.6)(18.9)(30.48)

345 ft 2 / ft 3

However, some of surface is blocked where the pellets touch. A better figure is 310ft2
=

28.81m2

Per cu ft bed, obtained by graphical interpolation of the values given by Sherwood and
Pig ford, p. 87.
Pellet surface in sq ft/ cuft of bed
From test data
Kg = Gm/(aPl) pf dy/y

45.9

ln(.10335/.00005)
(310)(30)(9)

=
Feed rate =

4000bbl

42gal *

24hr

1bbl

0.004186
3.76 lit

* 0.7424 Kg

1 gal

1 lit

= 42987 lbs/hr = 19539.5 kg/hr


Moler Feed rate = 42987/109.7 = 391.86 lb mols/hr = 178.1Kg mol/hr
H2 stream Feed rate = 245.7 lb mols /hr =111.68 Kg mol / hr
Mixed feed rate = 391.86 + 245.7 = 637.6 lb mols/hr
Letting S be crossectional area , ft2
L be bed height in ft

* 2.2 lbs
1Kg

Chapter #4

Equipment Design
As Gm = G/S

So our design equation for calculating bed volume is


Gm p f dy/y = aPKg L
Putting values in above equation according to our conditions
We get
637.6 * ln

0.10335 = 310*29.25*0.004186 L

0.00005

Sl = Volume of catalyst bed = 128.23 ft3 =11.91m3


Know we have to calculate height and dia of catalyst bed suitable for our bed volume,
Which is decided on the base of pressure drop across the catalyst bed.
For using equation for pressure drop, which is in Perry chemical engineering handbook
on p. 393, we have to calculate Nre first
Nre

DpG

Nre

0.364 G
(30.48)(0.0383)(2.42)

0.128G

Total average molar flow rate

637.6

Average molecular weight

4`2987+``2475
637.6

Chapter #4

Equipment Design
=

Gas density at 710 F

71.3

2.31 lbs/cuft =37Kg/ m3

(2fG2) (30.48)

And equation for P


P/L

= 2fU2 = 2fG2
gcDp

gcDp

(32.2)(36002)(2.31)(0.364)
0.0000001737fG2

=
G = 45462/S
F = 5Nre 1 + 0.4Nre 0.1

dia

0.039063 0.246229 0.285 0.03

45.46

2.82

0.08

7.61

192.00

0.026042 0.236445 0.262 0.06

30.31

4.23

0.25

6.21

2000

256.00

0.019531 0.22974

0.249 0.10

22.73

5.64

0.56

5.38

2500

320.00

0.015625 0.22467

0.24

0.15

18.18

7.05

1.06

4.81

3000

384.00

0.013021 0.220611 0.234 0.21

15.15

8.46

1.78

4.39

3500

448.00

0.011161 0.217236 0.228 0.28

12.99

9.87

2.76

4.07

4000

512.00

0.009766 0.214355 0.224 0.36

11.37

11.28

4.05

3.80

4500

576.00

0.008681 0.211845 0.221 0.45

10.10

12.69

5.67

3.59

5000

640.00

0.007813 0.209624 0.217 0.54

9.09

14.10

7.67

3.40

5500

704.00

0.007102 0.207636 0.215 0.65

8.27

15.51

10.08

3.24

6000

768.00

0.00651

0.205837 0.212 0.76

7.58

16.92

12.94

3.10

6500

832.00

0.00601

0.204196 0.21

0.89

6.99

18.33

16.28

2.98

7000

896.00

0.00558

0.202689 0.208 1.02

6.49

19.74

20.15

2.87

Nre

5/Nre

1000

128.00

1500

0.4/Nre

P/L

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Reactor design Parameters


Height, Pressure drop, Dia

25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

G (m ass velocity)

Know choose a value of G and calculate Nre, f, P/L, S, L, and P


From above table we suggested value of
Dia of bed = 3.8ft = 1.158m
Height of bed = 11.28ft3.44m
G = 4000lb/ft2.hr = 19560Kg/(m2.hr)
P = 4.05 Psi =0.2755atm
Know we have to select the distribution system for the feed

According to stander procedure ceramic balls are located at both ends of catalyst bed.
Generally the balls used are of 3mm Dia, 6mmdia and 19mmdia.

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

For a reactor ID of 3.8ft from table V-4


Main inlet distribution baskets Dia = 2 ft = 0.61m
Small distribution baskets dipped in catalyst bed, Dia = 6 inches
= 0.1524m
Small baskets height

= 4 ft = 1.219m

Number of small baskets

=7

According to the conventional procedure 60% of small baskets is dipped in catalyst bed,
So increase in catalyst bed height due to dipping of small baskets.
=

7x (0.52) x 4 x 0.6
4 x 13ft2

0.217 ft = .0661m

So
Corrected bed height = 11.28 + 0.217 = 11.5 ft
Bed height with ceramic ball = 11.5 +2 = 13.5 ft
Giving 20% vacant space on top and bottom.
Additional Reactor height = .4 x 11.5 = 4.6 ft
Total Reactor Height

= 18.1ft = 5.51m

Reactor Dia = catalyst bed Dia = 3.8 ft = 1.158m

SPACIFICATION SHEET REACTOR-130

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Identification:
Unit
Item No.
Type
Function:
Type of Operation

Fluid Circulated
Feed Rates
Temperature
Inlet

369 oC

Outlet 374 oC

Reactor
R-130
Fixed Bed, Catalytic, Adiabatic,
Nonisothermal
Hydrotreating of Naphtha
Continuous, Gas phase operation

Reactor
Naphtha + H2 Stream
20664.5 kg / hr
Sulphur Contents

Catalyst
Name S-7
Composition
5% Cobalt Oxide

Feed

10% Nicle Oxide

1033.5ppm

Product: 0.5ppm

P = 0.278atm

20% Molybdenium oxide


On Silica / Alumina Sport
Material

Material Of Construction

Killed Steel
Distribution System
No
Dia

Specification

Height

Bed volume 11.9m3

Main basket

0.61m

0.914m

Diameter 1.16 m

Small Baskets

0.152m

1.21m

Height

5.51 m

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

4.4 AIR COOLED HEAT EXCHANGER


An ACHE is a device for rejecting heat from a fluid directly to ambient air. This is in
contrast to rejecting heat to water and then rejecting it to air, as with a shell and tube heat
exchanger.
Air cooler has many advantages over water cooling so there is a comparison between air
and water cooling
Air Versus Water Cooling

Air
1.

Water
Air is available free in 1

Water is corrosive and require

abundant quantity with no preparation treatment to control both scaling and


cost.
2.

deposition of dirt.
Mechanical design of an air 2

Danger of process fluid

cooler is very much easy as the process contamination is much greater.


fluid is always on the tube side.
3.

Operating cost for water

Cleaning and Maintenance cooler is high, because of higher

is easy in air coolers.


4.

Non corrosive in nature.

cooling water circulation pumps HP &


water treatment cost.

TYPES OF AIR COOLED HEAT EXCHANGER


1) Forced Draft
2) Induced Draft

Chapter #4

An ACHE consists of the following components:


One or more bundles of heat transfer surface.

Equipment Design

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

An air-moving device, such as a fan, blower, or stack.


Unless it is natural draft, a driver and power transmission to mechanically
rotate the fan or blower.
A plenum between the bundle or bundles and the air-moving device.
A support structure high enough to allow air to enter beneath the ACHE at a
reasonable rate.
Optional header and fan maintenance walkways with ladders to grade.
Optional louvers for process outlet temperature control.
Comparison of forced and induced draft Air cooled Heat exchangers

Forced Draft ACHE

Induced Draft ACHE

Lower HP requirement if the


effluent air is hot.
Better

The hoods offer protection from

accessibility

for weather.

maintenance.
Easy

Better distribution of air.

More difficult to work on fan


to

work

on

fan assembly, due to heat from the bundle

assembly.

and due to their location.

Offered higher heat transfer


coefficient.

DESIGN CALCULATIONS OF AIR COOLER


Mass flow rate of naphtha

42987lb/hr

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Mass flow rate of water

1750lb/hr

Total mass flow rate

42987+2475+1750

47212.2 lb/hr

Inlet temperature

2000F

Outlet temperature

1400F

mCpT

47212.2x0.74x(200-140)

2096221.68Btu/hr

75 Btu/hr.ft2. 0F

Feed Temperature:

Assuming,
U
Calculation of temperature difference:
T1 = Process fluid inlet temperature

2000F

T2 =

process fluid outlet temperature

1400F

Ta1=

Air inlet temperature

900F

Height of fins

5/8in

Thickness

0.017in

Fins Selection:
Circular fins of aluminum

8fins/inch

Chapter #4

Equipment Design
Number of tube rows

Ft2 bare tube area /ft2 face area

5.04

1 in

650ft/min

Tube OD
Air velocity employed
For calculating face area required of bundle

Through factor calculation and then through graph


UAt / KVf

75x5.04/1.08x650

0.5384

1.8

From graph
KVfAf/wCp
So,
Af

= 1.8x47212.2x0.74/1.08x650
=

90ft2

Q/KAfVf

2096221/1.08x90x650

33.170F

90+33

So a bundle of standard size


4x24 ft2 face area should be selected
A safety factor of 6.6% is provided
Air temperature rise for 90ft2 face area

Air outlet temperature from bundle

Chapter #4

Equipment Design
=

Tlm =

1230F

(200-123)-(140-90)/ln (200-123)/ (140-90)

62.54 0F

t2-t1/T1-t1

123-90/200-90

0.3

T1-T2/t2-T1

60/33.1

1.81

From graph we found the correction factor for log mean temperature difference
For two pass flow,
FT

0.99

Tlm

62.54x0.99

61.90F

U A LMTDc

Required surface area

2096221/61.9x75

451.41 ft2

90x5.04

As,

Surface area from 90 ft2 face,


Area

Chapter #4

Equipment Design
=

453.1 ft2

This is close enough so, selection of U is right


Tube area of 4x24 bundle face for 4 row bundle,
Area

96x5.04

483.84 ft2

Number of tubes /Row = Total bare area/No. of row x Length x Tube bare area /ft of tube
23
Total no of tubes

483.84/4x24x0.2260

90 tubes

Two pass flow of tube side process stream


Air face velocity

650 ft /min

Density of air =air

0.073 lb/ft3

Gross free area

12(2.375-1)

16.5 in2

12x8x2x0.017x0.625

2.041 in2

Net free area

14.4 m2

Free area /face area

14.46/2.375x12

0.508

650x0.073x60/0.508

5604.3 lb/ft2.hr

Fin blockage

Gm

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

From figure,
h

9.8 Btu/hr ft2 0F

For fin efficiency for alluminium curve


(2h/kt) 1/2xL

Dfo/Dt

(2x9.8/120x0.017x12)1/2 x0.625/12

0.56

2.25/1

2.25

From above two factors using graph


Fin Efficiency

86%

Fin area

12x8[(2.25)2-12]x2x/4 + x2.25x0.017

624in2

4.33ft2

do(1-nt) L

3.14x1x(1-8x.017)x12/144

0.2261 ft2

4.33/0.2261

19.15

9.8(1915x0.86+1)

Tube bare area per length feet of tube

Ratio of fin area to tube area

Air side heat transfer coefficient


Based on outside diameter

Chapter #4

Equipment Design
ho

171. Btu/hr ft2 0F

Now calculating inside heat transfer coefficient hi


Cross sectional area

Re

hi

4.5 x x (0.0695)2/4

0.1707ft2

Mass flow rate /flow area

47212/0.1707

276578.8lb/ft2hr

DG/

0.0695x276578.8/0.46

41787.44

0.023xk/dx(Re)0.8 x(c/k)1/3

=0.023 x 0.06/0.0695 x (41787.4)0.8 x (0.71x0.46/0.061)1/3


=

175.59 Btu/hr ft2 0F

For air cooled heat exchanger


1/U = 1/ho + (Do/2Kw) lnDo/Di + (1/hi) Do/Di + Re
= 1/171.19 + 0.083/2 x 30 ln0.083/0.0695 + 1/175 x 0.083/0.0695 + 0.0004

0.013308

75.15

So from above it is proved that selection of U is right so the area selected is right too

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Calculation Of Air Side Pressure Drop


P = 18.93 (GmDr/)-0.316 (Pt/Dr)-0.927 (Pt/Pl) 0.515 (Gm2 n/gc)
Where,
Gm = mass velocity at minimum cross section through the rows of the tube
normal to the flow
Dr = root diameter of tube
gc = acceleration of gravity 4.18x108 ft/hr hr

= density of gas

Pl = longitudinal pitch between adjacent tubes in different rows measured on


the diagonal, in
P

18.93(4836 x 0.0729/0.018 x 2.42) (2.375/0.875) -0.927 (2.375/2) 0.515


(4836x4/4.18x108x0.063)
= 0.17lbf/ft2
= 0.00471psi
= 0.129in H20

P static for 4 rows

= 0.516 in H20

P dynamic for 650 ft/min and 4 rows


From graph 0.4 in H20
Total P

= 0.916 in

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Fans
As fan area is 40 to 50% of bundle face area, fan must be 6in apart from the bundle wall
So,
6 fans of diameter 3ft will be suitable
For a bundle of 4 x 24 ft2
Total fan area

Motor Hp

/4x 32x 6

42.41 ft2

actual ft3 /min (at fan) total pressure drop /6356


-fan (system efficiency)- (speed reducer efficiency)
= 650 x 42.41-0.916/6356 80 - 95
= 4.46Hp for 6 fans = 0.743 Hp for one fan

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

AIR COOLED HEAT EXCHANGER SPECIFICATION SHEET


PERFORMANCE DATA
TUBE SIDE
MASS FLOW RATE
INLET TEMPERATURE
OUTLET TEMPERATURE
PRESSURE
HEAT CAPACITY
VISCOSITY
HEAT LOAD
ALLOWABLE PRESSURE
DROP
DESIGN PRESSURE DROP

Kg/hr
0
C
0
C
atm
KJ/Kg0C
Kg/m hr
KJ/hr
atm
atm

21460
93.33
60
26.4
0.0035
0.72
2.09106
0.916in
H2O

AIR SIDE
AIR VELOCITY
MASS VELOCITY
INLET TEMPERATURE
OUTLET TEMPERATURE
PRESSURE DROP

m/min
Kg/m2 hr
0
C
0
C
atm

198.12
23635
32.2
50.7
0.0306

CONSTRUCTION
TUBE
MATERIAL
OUTER DIA
INNER DIA
NO. OF TUBES
PITCH
NO. OF PASSES
NO. OF ROW

FIN

m
m
m

Killed
steel
0.0254
0.0211
90
0.06
2
4

MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT
FAN
NO. OF UNIT
DIAMETER OF FAN
NO. OF BLADE
BLADE MATERIAL
FAN MATERIAL
POWER

m
PLASTIC
CAST
IRON
KW

6
0.9146
4

MATERIAL
TYPE
HEIGHT
NO. OF FIN /m
THICKNESS

ALUMINUM
CIRCULAR
m
m

0.0158
315
0.0004

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

4.5 DESIGN OF SEPARATOR


The separator used in that process is actually three phase separator in which we are
adding water to remove solid particles from naphtha stream .so we have here

Separated gaseous stream

Liquid stream

Water

Here the vessel used is horizontal because

Handling high capacity

Water has to be separated from the stream

DATA:
Gas:
In soluble phase

1275 lbs/hr

In gaseous phase

1257.2 lbs/hr

Liquid Naphtha

42987 lb/hr

Total liquid flow rate

42987 + 1750 + 2475.52 - 1257.2

45955.32 lbs/hr

1257.2 lbs/hr

0.349 lb/sec

Liquid:

Total gas flow rate

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Moles of gas
=

1257.2/6.4

196.43 lbmoles / hr

Pressurjre of gas

370psi

Temperature of gas

110F =

Number of moles of gas

196.43 lbmoles / hr

Gas constant =

10.72psi.ft3 / lbmole.oF

PV

nRT

nRT / P

196.43 x 10.72 x 570/370

3245.8 ft3

1257.2 / 3245.8

0.387 lb/ ft3

46.9 lbs/hr

Volume of gas:

Volume of gas

570R

Density of gas ( )
v

Density of liquid ( )
l

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Selection of Lv/Dv
The most economical length to diameter ratio depends upon operating
pressure here from 290 to 507.64 psi we use Lv / Dv = 4 and the operating pressure of
that process is 370psi
Selection of liquid height hv
hv

Dv / 2

Fraction of total area occupied by the vapor fv


Fv

0.5

0.07 [(L v) / v]1/2

0.767 ft / sec

Settling velocity of liquid droplets


Ut

Here the separator without demister pad is tried so for that


Ua

0.15 x Ut

0.115 ft / sec

mass flow rate / density

0.349 / 0.387

0.901 ft3 /sec

Vapor volumetric flow rate Qv

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Cross sectional area for vapor flow Av


=

Dv2 / 4 x 0.5

0.392 Dv2

Qv / Av

0.901 / 0.392 Dv2

2.3 Dv-2

Vapor velocity Uv

Vapor residence time required for the liquid droplets to settle on the liquid surface:
=

hv / Ua

0.5 Dv / 0.115

4.347 Dv

vessel length /vapor velocity

L v / Uv

4 Dv / Uv

4 Dv / 2.3 Dv-2

1.74 Dv3

Actual residence time:

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

For satisfactory separation:


Required residence time = actual residence time
4.347 Dv = 1.74 Dv3
Dv = 1.6ft

Liquid hold up time:


Liquid volumetric flow rate = 45955.32 lbs / hr
= 12.76 lbs / sec
= 12.76 / 46.9
= 0.272 ft3/ sec
Liquid cross-sectional area = Dv2 / 4 x 0.5
= (1.6)2 /4 x 0.5
= 1 ft2
Length Lv
Lv

= 4 Dv
= 4x1.6
= 6.4 ft

Hold up volume

= area x length
= 1 x 6.4
= 6.4 ft3

Chapter #4

Equipment Design
Hold up time = liquid volume / liquid flow rate
=

6.4/0.272

23.52 sec

0.392 min

This is unsatisfactory, 3 minutes minimum required. Need to increase the liquid volume
this is best done by increasing vessel diameter the diameter must be increased by the
factor of roughly (3/0.392)1/2

2.76

New Dv

1.6 x 2.76

4.42 ft

4 x Dv

16 ft

cross-sectional area x Length

( (4)2 / 4 x 0.5) x (4x 4)

100.5 ft3

volume/flow rate

100.5 / 0.272

369.5 sec

6.15 min

New Lv

New liquid volume

Liquid residence time

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

BOOT DESIGN:
Residence time

6.15 min

Water flow rate

1750 ft3 / hr

Keeping interphase on 50% level of leg


Amount of water

1750 x 6.15 / 60

179.4 lbs

179.4 / (2.2 x 0.987)

82.6 L

2.92 ft3

area x length

D2 / 4 x 5 x D

Dv

1.23 ft

Lv

1.23 x 5

6.2 ft

Volume of water hold up in leg

Lv/Dv

As interphase is on 50%,

Total volume of leg

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

4.6 DESIGN OF DISTILLATION COLUMN


In industry it is common practice to separate a liquid mixture by distillating the
components, which have lower boiling points when they are in pure condition from those
having higher boiling points. This process is accomplished by partial vaporization and
subsequent condensation.

CHOICE BETWEEN PLATE AND PACKED COLUMN


Vapour liquid mass transfer operation may be carried either in plate column or packed
column. These two types of operations are quite different. A selection scheme considering
the factors under four headings.
i)

Factors that depend on the system i.e. scale, foaming, fouling factors,

corrosive systems, heat evolution, pressure drop, liquid holdup.


ii)

Factors that depend on the fluid flow moment.

iii)

Factors that depends upon the physical characteristics of the column and its

internals i.e. maintenance, weight, side stream, size and cost.


iv)

Factors that depend upon mode of operation i.e. batch distillation, continuous

distillation, turndown, intermittent distillation.


The relative merits of plate over packed column are as follows:
i)

Plate column are designed to handle wide range of liquid flow rates without

flooding.
ii)

If a system contains solid contents, it will be handled in plate column, because

solid will accumulate in the voids, coating the packing materials and making it
ineffective.
iii)

Dispersion difficulties are handled in plate column when flow rate of liquid

are low as compared to gases.

Chapter #4
iv)

Equipment Design

For large column heights, weight of the packed column is more than plate

column.
v)

If periodic cleaning is required, man holes will be provided for cleaning. In

packed columns packing must be removed before cleaning.


vi)

For non-foaming systems the plate column is preferred.

vii)

Design information for plate column are more readily available and more

reliable than that for packed column.


viii)

Inter stage cooling can be provide to remove heat of reaction or solution in

plate column.
ix)

When temperature change is involved, packing may be damaged.

For this particular process, Acetaldehyde, ethyl alcohol and water system, I have
selected plate column because:
i)

System is non-foaming.

ii)

Temperature is high (91o C).

CHOICE OF PLATE TYPE


There are four main tray types, the bubble cap, sieve tray, ballast or valve trays and the
counter flow trays. I have selected sieve tray because:
i)

They are lighter in weight and less expensive. It is easier and cheaper to

install.
ii)

Pressure drop is low as compared to bubble cap trays.

iii)

Peak efficiency is generally high.

iv)

Maintenance cost is reduced due to the ease of cleaning.

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

DESIGNING STEPS OF DISTILLATION COLUMN

Calculation of Minimum Reflux Ratio Rm.

Calculation of optimum reflux ratio.

Calculation of theoretical number of stages.

Calculation of actual number of stages.

Calculation of diameter of the column.

Calculation of weeping point.

Calculation of pressure drop.

Calculation of thickness of the shell.

Calculation of the height of the column.

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Colburns Method for Minimum Reflux Rm

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Rf = ratio of key components in the liquid part of feed.


Vf = XfB / XfA = 0.4345 / 0.0693 = 6.26
Xnl = Pinch composition of light key component.

X nl

rf

1 r f 1 i x fh

6.26
0.738
1 r 6.26 1 0.195

Xnl = Pinch composition of heavy key component.


= Xnl / rf = 0.738 / 0.26 = 0.118

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Rm

Rm

LH

X dA
X
LH dB

1 X nl
X nH

1
0.02448
0.0078

1
.
776


0.776 1 0.118
0.738
= 0.31

Fenske equation

X X
log a b
X b D X a
Nm 1
log AB

Nm + 1 =1.298/0.249 = 5.16
Nm = 4.16

N N m R Rm

N 1
R 1
N 4.16 8 0.3

N 1
8 1
N 4.16 0.85 N 0.85
N = 33.4
Viscosity

0.24,

LH 1.776,

LH 0.355

From figure 11.57 Coulson and Richardson, vol.2

0.75
So,

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Actual no. of plates = 33.4 / 0.75 = 44.5 = 44 plates


Maximum vapor flow rate in rectifying section = Vn = 25710 lbs
Maximum liquid flow rate in rectifying section = Ln = 24434 lbs
Maximum vapor flow rate in stripping section = Vm = 47193 lbs
Maximum liquid flow rate in stripping section = Lm = 90132 lbs
Plate spacing initial estimate = 0.5m = 18in
Calculation of column diameter based on flooding velocity
Calculate FLV = liquid vapor flow factor

FW

LW
VW

V
L

LW = liquid mass flow rate kg/s


VW = vapor mass flow rate, kg/s
FWTop

24434
25710

9
700.4

= 0.1076

FLV Bottom

90132 10.26
47193 742.4

= 0.22
From figure 11.27 Coulson and Richardson vol.6
t1 = a constant obtained from fig 11.27
K1 Top = 0.08

K2 Bottom = 0.07

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Uf = flooding velocity

L V
V

U f K1

U f Top 0.08

700.4 9
9

= 0.700 m/s

U f Bottom 0.07

742.4 10.2
10.2

= 0.6 m/s
Based on 80% flooding velocity

Superficial Vapor Velocity


U base 0.6 0.8 0.48 m/s
U v ,top 0.700 0.8 0.56 m/s
Maximum volumetric flow rate
Top

25710
0.36 m3/sec
2.2 9 3600

Bottom

47193
0.58
2.2 10.26 3600

Net Area Required


Top

0.36/0.56 = 0.643

Chapter #4

Equipment Design
Bottom

0.58/0.48

1.2

As first trial take downcomer area as 12% of the total.


Column cross sectional area
Base

0.643/0.88

0.73

Top

1.2/0.86

1.36

Column Diameter
Top

0.73 4
,

Bottom

= 0.96 m

= 1.31 m

Maximum liquid rate (kg/sec)


Top

11.38

Bottom

3.08

1.31m

For bottom column diameter

2
d
4

Column Area Ac

Ac

Downcomer area Ad

0.12 1.33

Net area An

1.36 4

1.33 m2

0.159 m2

Ac Ad

1.33 0.159

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

active area Aa

1.171 m2

Ac 2Ad

1.33 2(0.159)

1.012

Hole area Ah take 10% Aa as first trial =


Weir length (from figure 11.31)

0.1012 m2

1.3 0.76
=

0.988 m

Take weir height

50 mm

Hole diameter

5 mm

Plate thickness

5 mm

Check Weeping
Maximum liquid rate

Minimum liquid rate at 70% turn down

11.38 kg/sec

0.7 11.38
= 7.966 kg/sec

how

= weir crust

11.38

Maximum how 750

742.4 0.159

5/ 4

= 40.29 mm liquid

7.966

Minimum how 750

742.4 0.98

2/3

Chapter #4

Equipment Design
= 37.86 mm liquid
at minimum hw + how = 50 + 37.86
= 87.86 mm liquid

from fig 11.30, Coulson and Richardson Vol.6


K2 = 30.8

K 0.9 25.4 an
U min 2
10.26 1/ 2

30.8 0.9 25.4 5


U min
10.26 1/ 2
= 3.883 m/s

Actual minimum vapour velocity

minimum vapour rate


Ah

0.7 0.58
0.1012

= 4.01 m/s
So minimum vapor rate will be well above the weep point.

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Plate Pressure Drop


Dry Plate Drop
Max. vapour velocity through holes

0.58
U h
5.73 m/s
0.1012
from fig. 11.34 for plate thickness/hole dia = 1

and

Ah Ah

0.1
Ap Aa
lo = 0.84

U
hd 51 h
lo
5.73
hd 51
0.84

V
L

10.26
= 32.8 mm liquid
742.4

Residual Head
12.5 103
hr
16.83 mm liquid
742.4
Total pressure drop = 32.8 + (50 + 40.20) + 16.83
ht = 139.92 mm liquid

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Downcomer Liquid Backup


Take hap = hw 10 = 40 mm
Area under apion 0.988 40 103
= 0.03952 m2
As this is less than Ad use Aap in eq. 11.92 i.e,

hdc

166 wd
L An

11.38

hdc 166
742.4 0.039

= 25.64 mm ~ 26 mm
Backup in downcomer
hb

= 139.92 + 40.29 + 25.64


= 205.85 mm
= 0.20585 m

0.205 < (Tray spacing + weir height)


So tray spacing is acceptable

Check Residence Time


tr

0.159 0.205 742.4


71.966

Chapter #4

Equipment Design
= 3.03 sec
> 3 sec satisfactory

Check Entrainment
UV

0.58 / 1.171

0.495 m/s

Percent flooding

0.495/0.6

0.082%

FLV = 0.22

from fig. 11.29 = 0.018 well below 0.1

Satisfactory

Trial Lay Out


Use cartridge type construction. Allow 50 mm imperforated strip round plate edge; 50
mm wide calming zeros.
From fig. 11.32
Lw/Dc

0.76

QL

99

Angle subtended at plate edge by imperforated strip = 180 99 = 81o

Mean length, unpeeforoted edge strip tr 1.3 50 10

81180 1.76

Area of unpeeforated edge strip 50 1.76 0.088 m2

Mean length of calming zone 1.3 50 10

sin 992 0.95 m

Area of calming zone 2 0.95 50 103 0.095


Total area of peeforations, Ap = 1.012 0.095 = 0.917 m2

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Ah 0.1012

0.11
Ap 0.917
From fig. 11.33 lp/dh = 2.6, satisfactory within 2.5 = 4.0

No of Holes
Area of one hole 1.964 105
No. of holes

0.1012
1.964 105
= 5152.74

TOP DIAMETER
Max. volume liquid flow rate

24434 kg/hr

Max. vapor liquid flow rate

25710 kg/hr

V 9
L 700.4
Liquid flow rate

6.787 kg/sec

Vapour flow rate

7.141 kg/sec

0.96 m

For above feed plate


Column dia

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Ac = Column Area

2
d 0.72 m2
4

Ad 0.12 0.72 0.0864


An Ac Ad 0.72 0.0864 m2
=

0.6336 m2

0.5472 m2

Hole area Ah take 10% Aa

0.05472 m2

Weir length

Aa = Ac 2Ad

0.0864
100 12
0.72

lw
0.76
Dc
lw 0.76 0.96 0.7296
Take weir height

50 mm

Hole diameter

5 mm

Plate thickness

5 mm

6.78 kg/sec

Check Weeping
Maximum liquid flow rte

Minimum liquid. Rate at 70% turn down 0.7 6.78 4.76 kg/sec

6.78

Maximum how 750

700 0.0864

5/ 4

Chapter #4

Equipment Design
=

4.76

Minimum how 750

700 0.729

At min. rate

48.65 mm liquid

2/3

33.24 mm liq.

50 + 33.24

83.24 mm liq.

30.8

From fig. 11.30


K2

30.8 0.9 25.4 5


U h(min)
4.146 m/s
1/ 2
9
Actual min. vapor velocity

min . vap. rate


Ah

0.7 0.36
0.054

= 4.66
So well above weep point

Plate Pressure Drop


Dry Plate Drop
Max. vap. Velocity strength holes

6.78 / 9
U h
13.95 m/sec
0.054

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

From fig. 11.34 for plate thickness/hole diameter = 1


and

Ah / Ap

0.1

13.95
Ad 51

0.84

9
700

21.5 mm liq.

21.5 + 50 + 48.65 + 17.85

138 mm liq.

hw 10 = 40 mm

Residual Head
ht

Down comer liquid back up


Take hap

Aap 0.729 40 103

Area under apron

hdc

0.0291 m2

6.78

166

700 0.029

18.51 mm liq.

50 + 48.65 + 138 + 18.51

255.16 mm

0.255 m

Backup in down comer


hb

0.255 < (Tray spacing + weir height)

So, tray spacing is acceptable.

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Check Residence Time


tr

0.0864 0.255 700


4.76

3.24 sec

>

3 is Satisfactory

Check Entrainment
Uv

0.36
0.36

0.56 m/sec
Ah
0.6336

Percent flooding

FLV = 0.107,

0.56
0.81%
0.7
= 0.05

well below 0.1

From fig. 11.29

Trial Layout
Use cartridge type construction. Allow 50mm upperforated strip vannd plate edge; 50mm
wide calming zone.
From fig. 11.32

lw

Dc

0.76

QC = 99o
Angle subtended at plate edge by unperforated strip = 180 99 = 81o

Mean length, unperforated edge strip 0.96 50 103 8 / 180 1.28 m

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

Area of unperforted edge strip 0.96 50 10

sin 992 0.692 m

Area of calming zone 2 0.692 50 103 0.0692 m2


Total area of perforations, Ap = 0.5472 0.0692 = 0.478 m2

Ah 0.0547

0.11
Ap 0.478
From fig. 11.33 lp/dh = 2.6 satisfactory

No. of Holes
Area of one hole

2
1.964 105 m

No. of holes

0.0547
1.764 105

2785.13

Chapter #4

Equipment Design

SPECIFICATION SHEET
Identification:
Unit
Item No.
Type

Function:
Type of Operation

Distillation Column
D-180
Sieve Tray Column

Seperation of Light Components


Continuous

DESIGN DATA
Trays design
No of Trays :
43
Tray Spacing:
0.4m
Diameter:
1.3m

Hole design
Weir Height: 1in
Weir Length: 0.988m
Hole area:
0.1012m2

Efficiency:
75%
Pressure drop per plate: 139.92mm liq

Area of one hole:


0.0000196m2
Hole diameter:
0.00635in
No. of holes: 5152

Down comer area:


Fraction entrainment:

0.159 m2
0.018

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design

CHAPTER 5

MECHANICAL DESIGN
5.1 Shell & Tube heat exchanger:
Shell side:
Material carbon steel
Working pressure 0.1N / mm 2
Design pressure 0.11N / mm 2
Permissible stress for carbon steel 95 N / mm 2
Dia of shell = 673mm

Tube side:
Working pressure = 0.5N / mm 2
Design pressure = 0.55N / mm 2

Shell thickness:
ts = PD/2f J+P = (0.11x 673) / {(2 x 95 x 0.85) + 0.11}
= 0.45mm
Minimum thickness of shell must be 6.3 mm
Including corrosion allowance, ts = 8mm.

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design

Head thickness:
Shallow dished & torispherical head
t h = PRcW / 2 fJ
Rc crown radius
W stress intensification factor
W= 1/4 [Rc / Rk] 0.5
Rk = 6% Rc
W= 1 / 4 [3+ (1 / 6) 0.5]
J= 1
th = (0.11 x 1.77 x 673) / 2 x 95
= 0.689 mm.
Use thickness as it for shell i.e. 8 mm

Segmental baffles:
Baffle spacing = 0.4 x 673 = 269.2 mm
Thickness of baffles = 6 mm

Tie rods and spaces:


Diameter of tie rod = 10 mm
Number of tie rods = 6

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design

Flanges:
Shell thickness = go = 8 mm
Flange material IS: 2004 1962 class 2
Gasket material asbestos composition
Bolting steel = 5% Cr Mo steel
Allowable stress of flange material 100 MN / m2
Allowable stress of bolting material, Sg 138 MN/m2
Outside diameter = B = 673 + (2 x 8)
= 689 mm

Gasket width:
do / di = [(y- pm)/ (y- p{m+1})] 0.5
m gasket factor 2.75
y min design seating stress 25.5 MN / m2
Gasket thickness = 1.6 mm
Thus,
do / di = 1.002
Let di of the gasket equal 683 mm [10 mm greater than shell dia]
do = 0.683 x 1.002.= 0.684m
Mean gasket width = (0.684 0.683) /2
= 6.83 x 10-4

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design

Taking gasket width of 12 mm,


do = 0.696 m
Basic gasket seating width, bo = 5mm
Diameter of location of gasket load reaction is,
G = di + N
= 0.683 + 0.012
= 0.695m

5.2

Estimation of bolt loads:


Load due to design pressure:
H = G2 P / 4 = (3.14 x 0.695 x 0.11) / 4
= 0.06004 MN

Load to keep joint tight under operation:


Hp = G(26)mp
=3.14 x0.695 x 2 x 5 x 10 -3 x 2.75 x 0.11
= 6.6 x10-3 MN

Total operating load:


Wo = H + Hp
= 0.066MN

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design

Load to seat gasket under bolting up condition:


Wg

Gby

x 0.695 x 0.005 x 25.5

0.2783 MN

Controlling load

Minimum bolting area

0.2783 MN
=

0.2783/138

2.02 x 10-3 m2

Am

Wg/Sg

1.415 go for weld leg

B +2(g1+R)

Take Bolt size M 18 x 2


Actual number of bolts 44
R

0.027m

g1

go/0.707

go

8mm

Bolt circle diameter,

0.689 + 2 (1.415 x 0.008 + 0.027)

0.76564 m

Using 66 mm bolt spacing,


C

44 x 0.066 /

0.9243 m

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design

Bolt circle diameter, C

0.93 m

Flange outside diameter


A

C + bolt diameter + 0.02 m (minimum)

0.93 + 0.018 + 0.02

0.968 =

0.97m

Check of gasket width


AbSg / GN

= ( 1.56 x 10-4 x 44 x 138) / x 0.012 x 0.4 x 0.475

= 50.43 < 2y.It is satisfied

Flange moment computation:


For operating condition:
Wo

W1 + W2 + W3

W1

(B2 / 4) P
/ 4 (0.689)2 0.11

W2

W3

0.0410

H-W1

0.06004 0.0410

1.9 x 10 -3

Wo-H =

6.6 x 10 -3 MN

Total flange moment,

Hp (gasket load)

Mo = W1a1 + W2a2 + W3a3

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design
a1 = (C-B) / 2 = 0.93-0.689/2 = 0.241
a3 = (C-B) / 2 = 0.93-0.689 / 2 = 0.241
a2 = (a1+a2) /2 = 0.241
Mo = 1.1 x 10 -2

For bolting up condition


Mg = W. a3
W = (Am +Ab)/(2). Sg
Ab = area of bolt
= 44 x 1.56 x 10 -4
= 6.76 x 10 -3 m 2
Am = Minimum bolt area. =1.38 x 10 -3 m 2
Sg = 138N/mm 2
W = 0.562 MN
a3 = 0.241
Mg = 0.135 MN-m
Mg is controlling moment

Flange thickness:
t 2 = (MCfY)/(BSt) = (MCfY/BSfo)
K= (A/B)
= (0.97/0.689)

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design

= 1.407
Assume, Cf =1
From the graph, Y = 3
M = 0.1275MN-m
St = Allowable stress
=100MN / m 2
t 2 =(0.1275 x 3) / (0.689 x 100)
= 0.0055
t = 0.074m

Tube sheet thickness:


tts. = F x G [0.025 x P / 95] 1/2
= 1 x 0.695 [0.025 x 0.55 / 95] 1/2
= 8.36 mm
tts = 11.3 mm including corrosion allowance

Channel and channel cover:


th = Gc [KP/95]1/2
= 0.695 [1.407x0.55/95]1/2
= 6.27mm
th =10mm including corrosion allowance.

Nozzle:

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design

Thickness of nozzle = PD/2fJ-P


Inlet & outlet dia 100 mm
Vent 50 mm
Drain 50 mm
Opening for relief value 75 mm
tn = 0.55 x 100/2 x 95 x (1-0.55)

= 0.293
Corrosion allowance 3 mm
tn = 4 mm
Considering the size of the nozzle & the pressure rating, it is necessary to provide for a
reinforcing pad on the channel cover.
Area required to be compensated for each nozzle
A = d x th = 100 x 10 = 1000 mm 2.

Saddle Support:
Material- low carbon steel
Diameter = 454 mm
Length of the shell, L = 3.8 m
Knuckle radius = 6% of diameter
= 27.24 mm
Total depth of head = [Dx r /2]1/2

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design
= [454x27.4 / 2 ]1/2
H= 78.63mm

Weight of vessel & contents, W = 11943 kg.


Distance of saddle centerline from shell end,
A = 0.5 x R = 113.5 mm

Longitudianl bending moments:


M1 = QA [ {1- ( 1- A/L + {R2 H2 }/2AL)}/ 1+ 4L/ 3L]
Q = Load carried by each symmetrical support
= W/2 ( L + 4H/3)
= 11943/2 ( 3.05 +4x0.078 /3)
=18834.1 Kg
M2 = QL/4 [{{ 1+2 {(R2 H2) / L2}/ {1+ 4H / 3L}} 4A / L]
So, M1 = 12.778 Kg.m
M2 = 10218 Kg.m
Stresses in shell at the saddle
1.At the topmost fibre of the cross section.
F1= M1 / k1 R2 t
K1 = 1
t = thickness of the shell
f1 = 12.778 / ( 3.14 x 0.008 x 0.2272)

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design
= 0.9865 Kg / cm2

2.At the bottom most fibre of the cross section


F2= M1 / k2 R2 t
K2 = 1
F2= 0.9865 Kg/cm2
Stresses are well within the permissible values.
Stresses in the shell at mid span:
The stress at the span is,
F3= M2 / R2 t
= 789.46Kg / cm2
Axial stress is the shell due to internal pressure :
Fd = P Di / 4 t
= 1.12 x 673 / 4 x 8 = 23.55 Kg / cm2
f3 + fp = 813.015 kg / cm2
Stresses are well within the permissible values.

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design

CHAPTER 6

PUMP SELECTION
6.1 FACTORS AFFECTING CHOICE OF A PUMP
1)

Many different factors can influence the final choice of a pump for a particular

operation. The following list indicates the major factors that govern pump selection.
2)

The amount of fluid that must be pumped. This factor determines the size of pump

(or pumps) necessary.


3)

The properties of the fluid. The density and the viscosity; of the fluid influence

the power requirement for a given set of operating conditions, corrosive properties of the
fluid determine the acceptable materials of construction. If solid particles are suspended
in the fluid, this factor dictates the amount of clearance necessary and may eliminate the
possibility of using certain types of pumps.
4)

The increase in pressure of the fluid due to the work input of the pumps. The head

change across the pump is influenced by the inlet and downstream reservoir pressures,
the change in vertical height of the delivery line, and frictional effects. This factor is a
major item in determining the power requirements.
5)

Type of flow distribution. If nonpulsating flow is required, certain types of

pumps, such as simplex reciprocating pumps, may be unsatisfactory. Similarly, if


operation is intermittent, a self-priming pump may be desirable, and corrosion difficulties
may be increased.
6)

Type of power supply. Rotary positive-displacement pumps and centrifugal

pumps are readily adaptable for use with electric-motor or internal-combustion-engine


drives; reciprocating pumps can be used with steam or gas drives.

Chapter #5
7)

Mechanical Design

Cost and mechanical efficiency of the pump.

6.2 PUMP SELECTION OF P-111


Flow rate = 4000 bbl / std
= 4000 bbl / std * 1std / 24hr * 1hr / 60min * 42 U.S . gallons / bbl
= 116.6 gallons / min
Inlet Pressure = 15 Psi
Outlet Pressure = 461Psi
Density

= 46.25 Lb/ft3

Developed Pressure = 446 Psi = 64224 Psf


Developed Head

= 1388.62 ft

Eff = 80 0.2855 F + 3.78 x 10 - 4 FG 2.38 x 10 -7FG2 + 5.39 x 10 4F2


-6.39 x 10 -7 F2 G + 4 x 10 -10 F2 G2
Where
Eff = Pump % age efficiency
F = Developed Head, ft
G = Flow rate, GPM
So putting values in the equation we get
Eff = 76.5%
H.P = GPM (P) / 1715* eff

Chapter #5

Where
GPM = flow rate in Gallon Per min.
P = Developed pressure, Psi
eff = Efficiency in fraction
Pump Horsepower = H.P = 35.67 h.

Mechanical Design

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design

CHAPTER 7

INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL


The important feature common to all process is that a process in never in a state of static
equilibrium except for a very short period of time and process is a dynamic entity subject
to continual upset or disturbance which' tend to drive it away from the desired state of
equilibrium the process must then be manipulated upon or corrected to derive some
disturbance bring about only transient effect in the process behavior. These passes away
and the never occur again. Others may apply periodic or cycle forces which may make
the process respond in a cyclic or periodic fashion. Most disturbances are completely
random with respect to time a show no repetitive pattern. Thus their occurrence may be
expected hut cannot be predicated at any particular time. If a process is to operate
efficiently, disturbances in the process must be controlled.
A process is designed for a particular objective or output and is then found. Sometimes by
trail and error and sometimes by referring from the previous, experience that control of a
particular variable associated with some stages of the process is necessary to achieve the
desired efficiency.
Each process will have associated with it number of variables which are independent of
the process and/ or its operation and which are likely to change at random. Each such
change will lead to changes in the dependent variables of the process one of which is
selected as bring indicative of successfully operation. One of the input variable will be
manipulated to cause further changes in the output variable will be manipulated to cause
further changes in the output variable the original conditions, Process may controlled
more precisely to give more uniform and higher quality products by the application of
automatic control, often leading to higher profits additionally, process which response too
rapidly to be controlled by human operators can be controlled automatically. Automatic
control is also beneficial in certain remote, hazardous or routine operations. After a

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design

period of experimentation, computers are now being used to operate automatically


control processing systems, which may too large and too complex for effective direct
human control.
Since process profit is usually the most important benefit to obtained by applying
automatic control. The quality of control and its cost should be compared with the
economic return expected and the process technical objective. The economic return
includes reduced operating costs, maintenance and of the specification product along with
improved process operability and increased throughout.

7.1 COMPONENTS OF THE CONTROL SYSTEM


Process
Any operation of series of operations that produce a desired final result is a process. In
this discussion the process is the purification of natural

Measuring Means
As all the parts of the control system, measuring element, is perhaps the most important.
If the measurements are not made properly the remainder of the system cannot operate
satisfactorily. The measured variable is chosen to represent the desired condition in the
process.

7.2 ANALYSIS OF MEASUREMENT


Variables to he Measured
a.

Pressure Measurement

b.

Temperature Measurement

c.

Flow Rate Measurement

d.

Level Measurement

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design

Variables to be Recorded
Indicated temperature, composition, pressure etc.

7.3 CONTROLLER
The controller is the mechanism that responds to any error indicated by the error
detecting mechanism. The output of the controller is some predetermined function of the
error. There arc three types of controllers.
1.

Proportion action which moves the control valve indirect proportion to the

magnitude of the error.


2.

Integral action (reset) which moves the control valve based on the time integral of the

error and the purpose of integral actions is to drive the process back to .its set point when
it has been disturbed.
3.

Ideal derivative action and its purpose are to anticipate where the process is

heading by cooking at the time a rate of change of error. The final control element
receives the signal from the controller and by some predetermined relationship changes
the energy input to the process.

CHARACTERISTICS OF CONTROLLER
In general the process controllers can be classified as
a.

Pneumatic controllers

b.

Electronic controllers

c.

Hydraulic controllers

While dealing with the gases, the controller and the final control element may be
pneumatically operated due to the following reasons.

Chapter #5
i.

The

Mechanical Design
pneumatic

controller

is

very

rugged

and

almost

free

of

maintenance. The maintenance men have not had sufficient training and background in
electronics, so pneumatic equipment is simple.
ii.

pneumatic controller appears to be safer in a potentially explosive atmosphere which

is often present in the industry.


iii.

Transmissions

distances

are

short

pneumatic

and

electronic

transmissions system are generally equal up to about 200 to 300 feet. Above this distance
electronic system beings to offer savings.

MODES OF CONTROL
The various types of control are called modes, and they determine type of response
obtained. In other words these describe the action of controller that is the relationship of
output of output signal to the input or error signal. It must be noted that is error that
achieve the controller. The four basic mode of control are:
1.

On-off control

2.

Integral control

3.

Proportional control

4.

Rate or derivative control

In industry purely integral, proportional or derivative modes seldom occur alone in the
control system. The on-off controller is the controller with very high gain. In this case the
error signal at once off the valve or any other parameter upon which it sites or completely
sets system.

7.4 ALARMS AND SAFETY TRIPS


Alarms are used to alert operators of serious and potentially hazardous, deviations in
process conditions, key instruments are fitted with switches and relays to operate audible

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design

and visual alarms on the control panels.


The basic components of an automatic trip system are
1.

A sensor to monitor the control variable and provide and output signal when a preset

value is exceeded (the instrument).


2. A link to transfer the signal to the activator, usually consisting of a system of
pneumatic or electric relays.
3. An activator to carry out the required action close or open a valve, switch off a motor.

7.5 CONTROL LOOPS


For instrumentation and control of different sections and equipments of plants, following
control loops are most often used.
1.

Feed backward control loop

2.

Feed forward control loop

3.

Ratio control loop

4.

Auctioneering control loop

5.

Split range control loop

6.

Cascade control loop

Here is given a short outline of these control schemes, so that to justify our selection of a
control loop for specified equipment.

FEED BACK CONTROL LOOP


A method of control in which a measured value of a process variable is compared with
the desired value of the process variable and any necessary action is taken. Feed back
control is considered as the basic control loops system. Its disadvantage lies in its

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design

operational procedure. For example if a certain quantity is entering in a process, then a


monitor will be there at the process to note its value. Any changes from the set point will
be sent to the final control element through the controller so that to adjust the incoming
quantity according to desired value (set point). But in fact change has already occurred
and only corrective action can be taken while using feed back-control system.

FEED FORWARD CONTROL LOOP


A method of control in which the value of a disturbance is measured, and action is taken
to prevent the disturbance by changing the value of a process variable. This is a control
method designed to prevent errors from occurring in a process variable. This control
system is better than feed back control because it anticipates the change in the process
variable before it enters the process takes the preventive action. While in feed back enter
system action is taken after the chanee has occurred.

RATIO CONTROL
A control loop in which, the controlling element maintains a predetermined ratio of one
variable to another. Usually this control loop is attached to such as system where two
different streams enter a vessel for reaction that may be of any kind. To maintain the
stoichiometic quantities of different streams this loop is used so that to ensure proper
process going on in the process vessel.

AUCTIONEERING CONTROL LOOP


This type of control loop is normally used for a huge vessel where, readings of a single
variable may be different at different locations. This type of control loop ensures safe
operation because it employs all the readings of different locations simultaneously, and
compares them with the set point, if any of those readings is deviating from the set point
then the controller sends appropriate signal to final control element.

SPLIT RANGE LOOP


In this loop controller is per set with different values corresponding to different action to

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design

be take at different conditions. The advantage of this loop is to maintain the proper
conditions and avoid abnormalities at very differential levels.

CASCADE CONTROL LOOP


This is a control in which two or more control loops are arranged so that the output of,
one controlling element adjusts the set point of another controlling element. This control
loop is used where proper and quick control is difficult by simple feed forward or feed
backward control. Normally first loop is a feed back control loop. We have selected a
cascade control loop for our heat exchanger in order to get quick on proper control.

7.6 INTERLOCKS
Where it is necessary to follow a fixed sequence of operations for example, during a plant
start-up and shut-down, or in batch operations. Interlocks are includes to prevent
operators departing from the required sequence. They may be incorporated in the control
system design, as pneumatic or electric relays or may be mechanical interlocks.

CONTROL OF HEAT EXCHANGER


The Normal Way
The normal method of controlling a heat exchanger is to measure exit temperature of
process fluid and adjust input of heating or cooling medium to hold the desired
temperature.
To stabilize this feed back control, in almost all cases the control must have a wide
proportional band (i.e, wide range of exit temperature change operates the control valve
through full stroke). The proportional band is determined by gain of other components in
the control loop by process considerations. It is an cxccniion when the usual combination
of conventional control elements permits use of narrow band control mechanism. .
Since heat-exchanger control require a wide proportional band for stabilization, reset
response (rate of change of heating medium How proportional to exit temperature.

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design

deviation from controller set point is normally required to correct for off set in the
controlled variable (temperature). It there are process load change and reset response can
be eliminated in cases where disturbance such as heating fluid header pressure, product
flow rate or inlet temperature changes have small effects relative to desired tolerance on
the controlled variable.
When throughout to a heat exchanger is changed rapidly a short-term error in control
temperature results. The magnitude and duration of this error can normally be reduced by
a factor of two by adding derivative response to the control mechanism and adjusting it
properly. In derivative responses, heating fluid flow rate is proportional to rate or change
of temperature derivation from the set point.
A Pressure Cascade Control
A pressure cascade control system cascades output of a standard three action temperature
controller into the set point of a pressure controller. It achieves a more rapid recovery to
process load disturbances in a shell-and-tube exchanger than can be obtained without the
pressure controller. Heating fluid to the heater is regulated by the pressure controller
which is normally provided with proportional and reset responses. Load change is rapidly
sensed by a change is shell pressure which is compensated for by the pressure controller.
The temperature control system senses the residual error and resets the pressure control
set point.
Bypass Improves Control of Slow-Response Exchanger
In certain cascade, the time response characteristic of heat exchanger is too slow to hold
temperature deviations resulting from load changes within desired tolerances. In some of
these cases, the transient characteristic of the heat exchanger can be circumvented by bypassing the heater with a parallel line and bledding cold process fluid with hot fluid from
the heater. In the by-pass system care must be taken in sizing valves to obtain the-desired
flow sprit with adequate flow versus steam travel characteristics. Thermal elements
response time is particularly important since this tie constant is a major factor influencing
performance of the system.

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design

Flow Controllers
These are used to control tin- feed rate into a process unit Orifice plates are by far the
most type of How-rate sensor. Normally orifice plates arc designed to give pressure drops
in the range of 20 to 200 inch of water Venture tubes amand turbine meter are also used.
Temperature controller
Thermocouples are the most commonly used temperature sensing device. The two
dissimilar wires produce a millivolt emf that varies with the hot-functions temperature.
Iron constant to thermocouples are commonly used over the 0 to 1300 F. temperature
range.
Pressure Controller
Bourdon

tubes,

bellows

and

diaphragms

are

used

to

sense

pressure

and differential pressure. For example, in mechanical system the process pressure force is
balanced by the movement of a spring. The spring positing can be related to process
pressure.
Level Indicator
Liquid levels are detected in a variety of ways. The three common are
1.

The following the position of a float that is lighter than the fluid.

2.

Measuring one apparent-weight of a heavy cylinder as it is buoyed up more or

less by the liquid (they are called displacement meters).


3.

Measuring the difference in static pressure between two fixed elevations, one in

the vapour above the liquid and the other under the liquid surface. The differential
pressure between the two level taps is directly related to the liquid level in the vessel.

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design

Transmitter
The transmitter is the interface between the process and its control system.The Job of the
transmitter is to convert the sensor signal (millivolts, mechanical movement, pressure
difference etc.) into a control signal 3 to 15 psig air pressure signal, 1 to 5 10 to 50 milli
ampere electrical signal etc.
Control Valves
The interface with the process at the other end of the control loop is made by the final
control element in an automatic control valves control the flow of heating. fluid the open
or close and orifice opening as the system is raised or lowered.

7.7 FEED BACK CONTROL LOOP OF HEAT EXCHANGER E-150

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design

CHAPTER 8

COST ESTIMATION AND ECONOMICS OF PLANT


LOCATION
8.1 PLANT COST ESTIMATION
As the final process-design stage is Complete, it becomes possible to make accurate cost
estimation because detailed equipment specification and definite plant facility
information are available. Direct price quotation based on detailed specification can then
be obtained from various manufacturers. However o design project should proceed to the
final stages before costs are considered and cost estimate should be made through out all
the early stages of the design when complete specifications are not available. Evaluation
of costs in the preliminary design is said predesign cost estimation. Such estimation
should be capable of providing a basis for company management to decide if further
capital should be invested in the project.
Evaluation of costs in the preliminary design phase is some time called guess estimations.
A plant design obviously must present a process that is capable of operating under
condition which will yield a profit.
A capital investments is required to any industrial process, and determination of the
necessary investment is an important part of a plant design project. The total investment
for any process consists of the physical . equipment and facilities in the plant plus the
working capital for money which must be available to pay salaries keep raw materials
and products on hand and handle other special items requiring a direct cast out lay.

8.2 CAPITAL INVESTMENTS


Before an industrial plant can be put into operation, large amount of

-money must be

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design

supplied to purchase and install the necessary machinery and equipment, land and service
facilities must be obtained and the plant-must be erected. Complete with all pipe controls
inn services. In addition it is necessary to have money available for payment of expenses
involved in the plant operation.
The capital needed to supply the necessary manufacturing and plant facilities is called the
fixed capital investment while the necessary for the operation of the plant is termed as the
working capital investment.
1.

Working Capital Investment

The capital which is necessary lor the operation of the plant is called working capital
investment.
2.

Fixed Capital Investment

The capital needed to supply flu- necessary maMiif'acttirini 1 and plant facilities is called
fixed capital investment.
The fixed capital investment classified in to two sub divisions,
i.

Direct Cost

ii.

Indirect Cost

DIRECT COST
The direct cost items arc incurred in the construction of the plant in addition to the cost of
equipment.
1.

Purchased Equipment

2.

Purchased Equipment Installation

3.

Instrumentation and Control

4.

Piping

Chapter #5

Mechanical Design

5.

Electrical Equipment and Materials

6.

Building (Including Services)

7.

Yard Improvement

8.

Services Facilities

9.

Land

INDIRECT COST
1.

Design and Engineering

2.

Contractor's Expenses

3.

Contractor's Fee

4.

Contingency

8.3 METHODS OF CAPITAL INVESTMENT


Various methods are employed for estimating capital investment. The choice of any
method depends on the foil owing-factors,
a.

Amount of detailed information available

b.

Accuracy Desired

Seven methods of estimating capital investments are outlined, estimate


1.

Detailed item estimate

2.

Unit estimate

3.

Percentage of delivered equipment cost

4.

Lang factor approximation of capacity ratio

Chapter #5
5.

Mechanical Design
Investment cost per capacity

The accuracy of an estimate depends on the amount of design detail available; and the
accuracy of the cost data available; and the time spent on preparing the estimate. In the
early stages of a project only an approximate estimate will be required an justified by the
amount of information by then developed.
PERCENTAGE DELIVERED EQUIPMENT
This

method

for

estimating

total

investment

requires

the

determination

of the delivered equipment cost. The cost of purchased equipment is the basis of several
pre design methods for estimating capital investment.The most accurate methods for
determining process equipment costs is to obtain firm bids from fabricators or suppliers.
Percentage of delivered equipment cost is the method used for estimating the fixed or
total capital investment requires determination of the delivered equipment cost. The other
items included in the total direct plant cost are then estimated as percentage of the
delivered equipment The addition components of the capital investment are based on
average percentage of total direct plant cost total direct and indirect plant costs or total
capital investment.
Estimating by percentage of delivered equipment cost is commonly used for preliminary
and study estimates. It yield most accurate results when applied to a project similar in
configuration to recently constructed plants.

Chapter #8

Cost Estimation and Economics of Plant


Location

DIRECT COST
PURCHASED Equipment Cost =E
COMPONENTS

% AGES OF E

COST ($)

Purchased equipment installation

47% E

Instrumentation (installed)

12%E

Piping (installed)

66% E

Electrical (installed)

11 % E

Building (including Service)

18% E

Yard improvement

10% E

Service facilities

70%. E

Land

6% E

Total direct cost


Total direct cost

D
=

INDIRECT COST
Engineering and supervision

33%E

Construction Expenses

41%E

Total indirect Cost

Total direct and indirect cost

D+I

Contractor's fee

5%(D+I)=y

Contigency

10%(D+I)= x

E/fixed Capital investment

D+I+x+y

Chapter #8
Working Capital investment
W.C.I

Cost Estimation and Economics of Plant


Location
W.C.I
15% total capital

Chapter #8

Cost Estimation and Economics of Plant


Location

8.4 COST ESTIMATION OF OUR PLANT


EQUIPMENT PURCHASE COST
Heat exchanger train E-110

68, 40, 000 Rs

Furnace E-120

1710000 Rs

Reactor R-130

5700000 Rs

ACHE E-140

1180000Rs

Trim cooler E-150

1220000 Rs

Three phases Separator H-160

1300000 Rs

Column Feed/Effluent exchanger

2230000 Rs

Distillation column D-180

5759280 Rs

CHE-187

2145454 Rs

Trim cooler E-183

770000Rs Rs

Phase Separator H-184

860000 Rs

Total Purchase

3, 74, 54734 Rs

3, 74, 54734 Rs

Direct Cost (Rs)


Purchased equipment cost

Purchased equipment installation = 0.47 3, 74, 54734 = Rs.17603709


Instrumentation & Process Control = 0.12 3, 74, 54734 = Rs. 4494564
Piping (installed) = 0.66 3, 74, 54734

= Rs. 24720100

Chapter #8

Cost Estimation and Economics of Plant


Location

Building (Including Services) = 0.18 3, 74, 54734 = Rs.6741846


Yard improvements = 0.1 3, 74, 54734

= Rs. 3745473

Service facilities (installed) = 0.7 3, 74, 54734 = Rs. 26218290


Land = 0.06 x 3, 74, 54734

= Rs. 2247282

Total direct plant cost

= Rs. 123225961

INDIRECT COST
Engg & Supervision = 0.33 3, 74, 54734 = Rs.12360051
Construction expenses = 0.41 3, 74, 54734 = Rs.15356427
Total Indirect Cost

= Rs. 27716478

Total Direct & Indirect Cost

= Rs150942439

Contractors fee = 0.05 150942439

= Rs. 7547121.95

Contingency = 0.1 150942439

= Rs. 15094243.9

FIXED CAPITAL INVESTMEN


Fixed Capital Investment = Total direct + indirect cost + contingency +
Contractors fee
= Rs. 173583804.9

Chapter #8

Cost Estimation and Economics of Plant


Location

Total capital investment=

F.C.I + W.C

Now
W.C

0.15 (T.C.I)

0.15 (173583804.9 + WC)

26037570.74
0.85

30632436.15 Rs

Total Capital Investment = T.C.I

20,42,16,241 Rs.

(Twenty caroor Fourty two lakes sixteen thousands ,two hundred and fourty one rupees
only)

8.5 ECONOMICS OF PLANT LOCATION


The final choice of the plant site usually involves a, presentation ol/the economic factors
for several equally attractive sites. He exact type of economic study of plant locations
will vary with each company making a study. It should include the following.

INVESTMENT
Plant
New Money
Existing facilities
Working capital
Annual sales
Cost

Chapter #8

Cost Estimation and Economics of Plant


Location

Manufacturing
Distributing
Selling
Research
Annual Earnings
Operative
Net after taxes
Net annual return
On total investment
The limitations of preliminary plan! location cost studies should be recognized pointed
out a management. No matter how carefully a survey is prepared, future trends such as
population and marketing shifts, development of competitive processes and the advent of
new industries. Services and transportation facilities cannot be reliably predicated.

PLANT LOCATION AND SITE SELECTION


The location of plant has a crucial effect on the profitability of project
for future expansion. Many factors are considered when

and the scope

selecting a suitable site.

A brief explanation of each factor is given below.


i.

Raw Materials Supply

Probably the location of the raw materials of an industry contributes more towards the
choice of a plant site than any other factor. This is especially noticeable in those
industries in which the raw material is inexpensive and bulky and is made more compact
and obtains a high bulk value during the process of manufacturing.

Chapter #8
ii.

Cost Estimation and Economics of Plant


Location

Marketing Area

For materials that are produced in bulk quantities, such as cement, minerals acids and
fertilizers, where the cost of e product per ton is relatively low and cost of transportation
has a significant fraction of the sale price. The plant should be located closed to the
primary market. This consideration will be less important for low volume production,
high price product such as pharmaceuticals.
iii.

Transportation Facilities

The Transport of material and products too and from the plant will be over riding
consideration in site selection.
If practicable, a site should be selected that is closed to at least two major forms of
transport, road, rail, water way (canal or river) or a sea port. Road transport is being
increasingly used and is suitable for local distribution from a central ware house. Rail
transportation will be cheaper for long distance transport of bulk chemicals.
Air transport is convenient and efficient for the movement of personnel and essential
equipment and supplies and the proximity of the site to a major airport should be
considered.
iv.

Sources of Power

Power for chemical industry is primarily from coal, water and oil; these fuels supply (he
most flexible and economical sources, in as much as they provide for generation of steam
both for processing and for electricity production power can be economically developed
as a by-product in the most chemical plants. If the needs are great enough, since the
process requirements generally call for low-pressure steam. The'turbines of engines used
to generate electricity can be operated non-condensing and supply exhaust steam for
processing purposes.

Chapter #8

v.

Cost Estimation and Economics of Plant


Location

Availability of Labour

Labour will be needed for construction of the plant and its operation. Skilled construction
workers will usually be brought in from outside the site area, but here should be an
adequate pool of unskilled labour available locally; and labour suitable for training to
operate plant. Skilled tradesmen will be needed for plant maintenance. Local trade union
customs and restrictive practices will have to be considered when assessing the
availability and suitability of the local labour for recruitment and training.
vi.

Water Supply

Water for industrial purpose can be obtained from one of two general sources: the plant's
own source or municipal supply. If the demand for water is larger, it is more economical
for the industry to supply its own water. Such a supply may be obtained from drilled
wells, rives, lakes, dammed streams or other impounded supplies. Before a company
enters upon any project, it must ensure itself of a sufficient supply of water for all
industrial, sanitary and fire demands, both present and future.
vii.

Effluent Disposal

All industrial process produce waste products and full consideration must be given to the
difficulties and cost of their disposal. The disposal of toxic and harmful effluents will be
covered by local regulations and appropriate authorities must be consulted during the
initial site survey to determine the standards that must be met
viii.

Local Community Considerations

The proposed plant must fit in with and be acceptable to the local community. Full
consideration must be given to the safe location of the plant so that it dies not impose a
significant additional risk to the community.
On a new site, the local community must be able to provide adequate facilities for, the
plant personnel: school, banks, housing and recreational and cultural facilities.

Chapter #8
ix.

Cost Estimation and Economics of Plant


Location

Land Considerations

Sufficient suitable land must be available for the proposed pant and for future expansion.
The land should ideally be flat, well drained and have suitable load bearing
characteristics. A full site evaluation should be made to determine the need for piling or
other special foundation.
x.

Climate

Adverse climatic conditions at a site will increase costs. Abnormally low temperature will
require the provision of additional insulation and special heating for equipment and pipe
runs. Stronger structures will be need at locations subjected to strong winds (cyclone
hurricane areas) or earthquakes.
xi.

Political and Strategic Considerations

Capital grants, tax concessions, and other inducements are often given by government's
direct new investment to preferred locations such as areas of high unemployment. The
availability of such grants can be over-riding consideration site selection.

Chapter #8

Cost Estimation and Economics of Plant


Location

CHAPTER 9

HAZOP STUDY
9.1 HYDROGEN SULFIDE POISONING
Hydrogen sulfide is an extremely poisonous gas. Hydrogen sul-fide poisoning results
from breathing hydrogen sulfide gas (2$), even in very low concentration. Two forms of
poisoning occur - acute and subacute.
1.

Acute Hydrogen Sulfide Poisoning

Breathing air or gas containing as little as 0.10% (40-60 grains of H 2S per 100 standard
cubic feet) for ONE MINUTE can cause acute poisoning.
Much sour natural or refinery gas contains more than 0.10% (60 grains per 100 cubic
feet), so care must always be taken to avoid breathing such sour gas. The naphtha
hydrotreating recycle gas and high pressure stripper gas contain from 0.5 to 5% H2$,
while the low pressure stripper gases contain from 10 to 50% H2S,
These gases must NEVER be breathed. One full breath of high concentration hydrogen
sulfide gas will cause unconsciousness, and may cause death, particularly if the victim
falls and remains in the presence of such gas.
The operation of any unit processing gases containing H 2S is perfectly safe, provided
ordinary precautions are taken and the poisonous nature of the gas is .recognized. No
work should be undertaken on the unit where there is danger of breathing H2S, and one
should never enter or remain in an area' containing it without wearing a suitable fresh air
mask.
2. Symptoms of Acute Hydrogen Sulfide Poisoning
Muscular spasms, irregular breathing, lowered pulse, odor to the breath, nausea. Loss of
consciousness and suspension of respiration quickly follow.

Chapter #8

Cost Estimation and Economics of Plant


Location

After apparent recovery, edema (dropsically swelling) of the air passages or lungs may
cause severe illness or death in 8 to 48 hours.
3. First Aid Treatment of Acute Poisoning
Remove the victim at once to fresh air. If breathing has not stopped, keep the victim in
fresh air and keep him quiet. If possible, put him to bed. Secure a physician and keep the
patient quiet and under close observation for about 48 hours for possible edema of the air
passages or lungs.
In cases where the victim has become unconscious and breathing has stopped, artificial
respiration must be started at once. If a Pulmotor or other mechanical equipment is
available, it may be used by a trained person; if not, artificial respiration by mouth-mouth
method must be started as soon as possible. Speed in beginning the artificial respiration is
essential. Do not give up. Men have been revived after more than four hours of artificial
respiration.
If other persons are present, send one of them for a physician. Others

should rub the

patient's arms and legs and apply hot water bottles, blankets or other sources of warmth
to keep him warm.
After the patient is revived, he should be kept quiet and warm, and remain under
observation for 48 hours 'for the appearance of edema of the air passages or lungs.
4. Subacute Hydrogen Sulfide Poisoning
Breathing air or gas containing 0.01 to 0.6% HS (6 to 40 grains per 100 cubic feet) for
an hour or more may cause subacute or chronic hydrogen sulfide poisoning.
5. Symptoms of Subacute Poisoning
Headache, inflammation of the eyes and throat, dizziness, indigestion, excessive saliva,
and weariness are all symptoms which follow continued exposure to H2$ in low
concentrations. Edema of the air passages and lungs may also occur.

Chapter #8

Cost Estimation and Economics of Plant


Location

6. Treatment of Subacute Poisoning


Keep the patient in the dark to reduce eyestrain and^ have a physician treat the inflamed
eyes and throat. Watch for possible edema.
Where subacute poisoning has been suspected, the atmosphere should be checked
repeatedly for the presence of H2S by such methods as testing by odor, with moist lead
acetate paper, and by Tutweiler determination to make sure that the condition does not
continue.
7. Prevention of Hydrogen Sulfide Poisoning
The best method for prevention of H2O poisoning 1s to stay out of areas known or
suspected to contain it. The sense of smell is not an infallible guide as to its presence, for
although the compound has a distinct and unpleasant odor (rotten eggs), it will frequently
paralyze the olfactory nerves to the extent that the victim does not realize that he is
breathing it. This is particularly true of higher concentrations of the gas.
Fresh air masks or gas masks suitable for use with hydrogen sulfide must be used in all
work where exposure to it is likely to occur. Such masks must be checked frequently to
make sure' that they are not exhausted. Whenever work is done on or in equipment
containing appreciable concentrations of H2S, men must wear fresh air masks and should
work in pairs so that one may effect a rescue or call for help should-the other be
overcome.
As mentioned above, , the atmosphere in which men work may be checked from time to
time for small concentrations such as would cause subacute poisoning.
REMEMBER - JUST BECAUSE YOUR NOSE SAYS IT'S NOT THERE,
DOESN'T MEAN THAT IT'S NOT 1
8. Further Information
A more detailed information booklet, The Chemical Safety Data Sheet SD36, may be
obtained by writing to:

Chapter #8

Cost Estimation and Economics of Plant


Location

Manufacturing Chemists Association 1825 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, DC


20009
9.2 NICKEL CARBONYL FORMATION
Nickel carbonyl [Ni(CO)4] is known to be an extremely toxic gas. Its primary effect is to
cause lung damage with a lesser effect on the liver. The maximum average exposure to
nickel carbonyl recommended by NIOSH is a TLV of 0.001 ppm (1 ppb), and a
maximum spot exposure of 0.04 ppm (40 ppb).
In Naphtha Hydrotreating units, the potential for forming nickel carbonyl exists only with
catalysts containing nickel (S-6, S-7, S-15, S-16), and only during regeneration or during
the handling of unregenerated catalyst. Care must be used to ensure that the procedures
used will prevent the formation of nickel carbonyl. Data has been published showing the
equilibrium concentration of Ni (C0)4 versus temperature, pressure, 'and CO
concentration in a gas. The nickel carbonyl concentration drops rapidly with increasing
temperature and decreasing CO concentration. At 7 kg/cm2g (100 psig) with 0.5 mol-%
CO in the gas, the nickel carbonyl concentration is at the maximum recommended spot
level of 0.04 ppm at 149C (300F), and 0.001 ppm at 182C (360F).
The following practices should be followed to prevent the formation of nickel carbonyl:
1. Once a reactor containing a nickel catalyst has been exposed to oxidizing conditions
(regeneration), a measurable concentration of oxygen must be maintained until the combustion of all carbon ceases and all CO2 has been purged from the system.
2.

Once a reactor containing a nickel catalyst is in a reducing atmosphere and

regeneration is not desirable, maintain the system in a reducing or inert atmosphere until
all the catalyst has been cooled to at least 66C (150F). Unregenerated catalyst should be
unloaded with Ng purged before receiving used catalyst. Oxidation (burning) must be
avoided.
There are many published techniques for determining the concentration of nickel
carbonyl in air (such as a vessel to be entered for maintenance), and several direct reading

Chapter #8

Cost Estimation and Economics of Plant


Location

instruments are available commercially. For further information, see:


American Industrial Hygiene Assoc. Journal May - June, 1968 Jan. - Feb., 1965
9.3

SAFETY

PRECAUTIONS

FOR

ENTERING

CONTAMINATED

ATMOSPHERE
Anyone entering a vessel which contains- an inert or contaminated atmosphere must
follow all prescribed standard safety precautions and regulations which apply. In
particular, when entering a reactor containing used catalyst, and which therefore can
contain some hydrocarbons and H2S along with possible pyrophoric iron sulfide deposits,
there are a number of additional precautions which apply and which should not be
overlooked. For this discussion, it is assumed that entry into a reactor containing used
catalyst under a nitrogen blanket is planned. In this case, the following precautions
should be included in the standard procedure:
1. The reactor should be isolated by positive action, such as blinding, to exclude all
sources of hydrocarbon, hydrogen, air, etc.
2.

Just prior to entry, all purging of nitrogen through the catalyst bed should be

discontinued, and nitrogen purge lines should be inserted at points ABOVE the catalyst
bed.
This is to assure that there will be no forced flow of vapors passing upward through the
catalyst bed and into the working area.,
3. Install an air mover outside the reactor near the open man way nozzle to sweep away
the vapors leaving ,the reactor.
4. The man entering the reactor must be equipped with a fresh air mask in proper
working condition, with a proper air supply.
5. "There should be available and ready for immediate use and transfer to the man in the
reactor, a separate spare air supply which is independent of electrical power.
6. The man entering the reactor should wear a safety harness with a properly attached

Chapter #8

Cost Estimation and Economics of Plant


Location

safety line.
7. There should be a minimum of two backup men at the man way nozzle in continual
surveillance of the actions of the man in the reactor.
8. There should be a spare fresh air mask complete with its own separate air supply to
allow a second man to enter the reactor quickly in case of an emergency. Therefore, this
spare equipment must be compact enough to allow the second man to enter through the
man way while wearing the equipment.
9. It is recommended that any man working in a. reactor which is under a nitrogen
blanket not be permitted to descend through any appurtenance, such as a tray or quench
gas distributor. The reason for this precaution is that should the man develop some
difficulty while below a tray, for example, to the point where he could not function
properly or lost consciousness, it would be extremely difficult for the surveillance team
outside the reactor to pull the man up through the small tray man way by use of the safety
line.
10. As an added precaution, it is suggested that the man in the reactor have available to
him in the reactor, an emergency self-contained air supply and appropriate associated
equipment. Preferably, the emergency air supply could be connected to the fresh air mask
he is wearing. Such "reserve air supply" systems are available commercially.

Chapter #8

Cost Estimation and Economics of Plant


Location

CHAPTER 10

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Petroleum refining is one of the largest industries in the United States and a vital part of
the national economy. However, potential environmental hazards associated with
refineries have caused increased concern for communities in close proximity to them.
This update provides a general overview of the processes involved and some of the
potential environmental hazards associated with petroleum refineries.
10.1 DEFINITION OF A PETROLEUM REFINERY
Petroleum refineries separate crude oil into a wide array of petroleum products through a
series of physical and chemical separation techniques. These techniques include
fractionation,

cracking,

hydrotreating,

combination/blending

processes,

and

manufacturing and transport. The refining industry supplies several widely used everyday
products including petroleum gas, kerosene, diesel fuel, motor oil, asphalt, and waxes.
10.2 BACKGROUND
The United States is one of largest producers and consumers of crude oil in the world.
Based on data from the U.S. Department of Energy (1998), in 1995 the United States was
responsible for about 23% of the worlds refinery production. With a record high of 324
refineries in the early 80s, the U.S. was able to produce about 18.6 million barrels per
day. However, because of changes in oil prices, a shift to alternate fuel use and an
increasing focus on conservation, by 1985 the industry lost several primarily small,
inefficient refineries that could not continue to compete. Over the last decade, the number
of refineries has continued to shrink from about 194 to the current 155. This decrease has
been due in part to increasing requirements placed on the facilities for producing cleaner
fuels along with a number of mandated federal and state clean air and water regulations.

Chapter #8

Cost Estimation and Economics of Plant


Location

10.3 PROCESSES INVOLVED IN REFINING CRUDE OIL


The process of oil refining involves a series of steps that includes separation and blending
of petroleum products. The five major processes are briefly described below:
1

Separation processes: These processes involve separating the different fractions/

hydrocarbon compounds that make up crude oil based on their boiling point differences.
Crude oil generally is composed of the entire range of components that make up gasoline,
diesel, oils and waxes. Separation is commonly achieved by using atmospheric and
vacuum distillation. Additional processing of these fractions is usually needed to produce
final products to be sold within the market.
2

Conversion processes: Cracking, reforming, coking, and visbreaking are conversion

processes used to break down large longer chain molecules into smaller ones by heating
or using catalysts. These processes allow refineries to break down the heavier oil
fractions into other light fractions to increase the fraction of higher demand components
such as gasoline, diesel fuels or whatever may be more useful at the time.
3

Treating: Petroleum-treating processes are used to separate the undesirable

components and impurities such as sulfur, nitrogen and heavy metals from the products.
This involves processes such as hydrotreating, deasphalting, acid gas removal, desalting,
hydrodesulphurization, and sweetening.
4

Blending/combination processes: Refineries use blending/combination processes to

create mixtures with the various petroleum fractions to produce a desired final product.
An example of this step would be to combine different mixtures of hydrocarbon chains to
produce lubricating oils, asphalt, or gasoline with different octane ratings.
5

Auxiliary processes: Refineries also have other processes and units that are vital to

operations by providing power, waste treatment and other utility services. Products from
these facilities are usually recycled and used in other processes within the refinery and
are also important in regards to minimizing water and air pollution. A few of these units
are boilers, wastewater treatment, and cooling towers.

Chapter #8

Cost Estimation and Economics of Plant


Location

10.4 ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS OF PETROLEUM REFINERIES


Refineries are generally considered a major source of pollutants in areas where they are
located and are regulated by a number of environmental laws related to air, land and
water. Some of the regulations that affect the refining industry include the Clean Air Act,
the Clean Water Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act, CERCLA (i.e. Superfund:
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act), Emergency
Planning and Community Right-to-Know (EPCRA), OSHA (Occupational Safety &
Health Administration), TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act), Oil Pollution Act and
Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plans. Here is a breakdown of the air,
water, and soil hazards posed by refineries:
1

Air pollution hazards: Petroleum refineries are a major source of hazardous and toxic

air pollutants such as BTEX compounds (benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylene).
They are also a major source of criteria air pollutants: particulate matter (PM), nitrogen
oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), and sulfur dioxide (SO2).
Refineries also release less toxic hydrocarbons such as natural gas (methane) and other
light volatile fuels and oils. Some of the chemicals released are known or suspected
cancer-causing agents, responsible for developmental and reproductive problems. They
may also aggravate certain respiratory conditions such as childhood asthma. Along with
the possible health effects from exposure to these chemicals, these chemicals may cause
worry and fear among residents of surrounding communities. Air emissions can come
from a number of sources within a petroleum refinery including: equipment leaks (from
valves or other devices); high-temperature combustion processes in the actual burning of
fuels for electricity generation; the heating of steam and process fluids; and the transfer of
products. Many thousands of pounds of these pollutants are typically emitted into the
environment over the course of a year through normal emissions, fugitive releases,
accidental releases, or plant upsets. The combination of volatile hydrocarbons and oxides
of nitrogen also contribute to ozone formation, one of the most important air pollution
problems in the United States.
2

Water pollution hazards: Refineries are also potential major contributors to ground

Chapter #8

Cost Estimation and Economics of Plant


Location

water and surface water contamination. Some refineries use deep-injection wells to
dispose of wastewater generated inside the plants, and some of these wastes end up in
aquifers and groundwater. These wastes are then regulated under the Safe Drinking Water
Act (SDWA). Wastewater in refineries may be highly contaminated given the number of
sources it can come into contact with during the refinery process (such as equipment
leaks and spills and the desalting of crude oil). This contaminated water may be process
wastewaters from desalting, water from cooling towers, storm water, distillation, or
cracking. It may contain oil residuals and many other hazardous wastes. This water is
recycled through many stages during the refining process and goes through several
treatment processes, including a wastewater treatment plant, before being released into
surface waters. The wastes discharged into surface waters are subject to state discharge
regulations and are regulated under the Clean Water Act (CWA). These discharge
guidelines limit the amounts of sulfides, ammonia, suspended solids and other
compounds that may be present in the wastewater. Although these guidelines are in place,
sometimes significant contamination from past discharges may remain in surface water
bodies.
3

Soil pollution hazards: Contamination of soils from the refining processes is generally

a less significant problem when compared to contamination of air and water. Past
production practices may have led to spills on the refinery property that now need to be
cleaned up. Natural bacteria that may use the petroleum products as food are often
effective at cleaning up petroleum spills and leaks compared to many other pollutants.
Many residuals are produced during the refining processes, and some of them are
recycled through other stages in the process. Other residuals are collected and disposed of
in landfills, or they may be recovered by other facilities. Soil contamination including
some hazardous wastes, spent catalysts or coke dust, tank bottoms, and sludges from the
treatment processes can occur from leaks as well as accidents or spills on or off site
during the transport process.

Chapter #8

Cost Estimation and Economics of Plant


Location

MARKET AND ENVIRONMENTAL FORCES CHANGING THE FACE OF THE


PETROLEUM INDUSTRY
The U.S. petroleum refining industry has come under considerable strain because of
several important factors and changes in the industry. Over the years, there has been an
increased demand for petroleum products and a decrease in U.S. production; however,
there has been no new major refinery construction in the United States in the last 25
years. This lack of infrastructure growth has caused a tremendous strain on the industry in
meeting existing demand, and the U.S. has had to increase the amounts of imports to
meet these needs.
The Clean Air Act and stringent state regulations have also caused the industry to incur
extremely high costs for environmental compliance. These costs are accrued because
refineries must produce reformulated, cleaner-burning gasoline, which require companies
to replace or modify existing equipment with devices for controlling emissions. These
costs of compliance are having a detrimental effect on refineries trying to expand and to
keep pace with the countrys increasing demand.
The cost of meeting environmental regulations has led many petroleum companies to join
with the federal and state governments in reducing the amounts of hazardous air
pollutants being released. Consent decrees between the petroleum industry and EPA have
been made to reduce air emissions by refineries. One particular agreement was made
between the state of Delaware, Louisiana and the Northwest Air Pollution Authority to
reduce air emissions of nitrogen oxide and sulfur dioxide from nine refineries by more
than 60,000 tons per year (EPA, 2001). The settlements are an effort to reduce the
amounts of illegal releases of harmful air pollutants from these refineries by installing upto-date pollution control devices and reducing emissions from leaking valves, flares and
process units within the refinery. This type of collaboration between refineries and the
state and federal governments provides a cooperative effort towards addressing
environmental concerns within the industry.

Chapter #8

Cost Estimation and Economics of Plant


Location

REFERENCE
1.

Ludwig, E.E, Applied process design , 3rd ed, vol. 2, Gulf Professional

Publishers, 2002.
2.

Ludwig, E.E, Applied Process Design, 3rd ed, vol. 3, Gulf Professional

Publishers, 2002.
3.

McKetta, J.J., Encyclopedia of chemical Processing and Design, Executive ed,

vol. 1, Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, 1976.


4.

Levenspiel, O., Chemical Reaction Engineering:, 3rd ed ,John Wily and Sons

Inc., 1999.
5.

Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus ,K.D., Plant Design and Economics for Chemical

Engineering , 5th ed, McGraw Hill, 1991.


6.

Rase, H.F., Fixed Bed Reactor Design and Diagnostics, Butterworth Publishers,

1990.
7.

Frank L., Evans Jr. Equipment Design Hand Book For Refineries & Chemical

Plants Vol 2, 2nd Ed., 1980,


8.

peacock,

D.G.,

Coulson

&

Richardson,s

Chemical

engineering,

3rded,vol,Butterworth Heinenann, 1994.


9.

Kern D.Q., Process Heat Transfer, McGraw Hill Inc.,2000.

10.

Mcabe, W.L, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering ,5 th ed, McGraw Hill,

Inc,1993.
11.

Perry, R.H and D.W. Green (eds): Perrys Chemical Engineering Hand Book, 7 th

ed. McGraw Hill New York, 1997.

Chapter #8
12.

Cost Estimation and Economics of Plant


Location

Sinnot, R.K.,Coulson & Richardsons Chemical Engineering, 2nd ed, vol.6,

Butterword Heinenann, 1993.


13.

Rohsenow,Hartnett,Ganic Hand Book of Heat Transfer Application 2nd edition.

14.

Fogler H.S. Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering 2nd Edition.

15.

W.L.Nelson. Petroleum Refinery Engineering4th Ed ,McGraw Hill.

16.

Kern, Donald Q:

Process Heat Transfer , McGraw-Hill

International Edition ,New York


a.

W.L. Nelson:

Petroleumner Refiy Engineering Fourth Edition,

a.

McGraw-Hill, New York.

17.

Kirk:

Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology John


Willey and Sons, New York

18.

Macketta, John J:

Encyclopedia of chemical Processing and

Design Marceer Dekker, INC., New York


19.

Warren M. Rohenson: Hand book of Heat Transfer , McGrawHill,


New York

a.

H. Etherington:

a.

Charles Griffin & Company Ltd. , London.

20.

Robert d. Reid:

21.

W.Trinks, M.H Mawhinney:Industrial Furnaces , 5th edition, Volume 1,

i.

Modern furnace technology , Third Edition,

Furnace Operation

John Wiley & Sons, INC., London.


22.

www.Reforming.Pdf

23.

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FVP

Chapter #8

Cost Estimation and Economics of Plant


Location

24.

http://www.hudsonproducts.com/Default.htm

25.

http://www.processassociates.com/process/heat/fouling1.htm#ptr

26.

http://www.processassociates.com/process/heat/uvalues1.htm#ptr

27.

http://www.processassociates.com/process/tools.htm

28.

www.ISCR17.pdf

29.

www.Radial-JM.pdf

You might also like