Professional Documents
Culture Documents
R Brooks
R Brooks
Plan
Project
EDTC520
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. What is your districts vision or mission statement? Five years from now, would a visitor
coming to your school see the technology supporting learning and teaching? Would there
be an improvement from today?
The mission statement for the Ontario Montclair School District is to provide a world-class
education to all of its students in a respectful and safe manner. The OMSD is committed to
empowering its students, families, and staff and cultivate partnerships with businesses,
communities and non-profit agencies.
The districts plan is to:
1) Promote proficiency for all students as defined in State standards by embedding
writing and balanced literacy in all content areas and accelerating the reclassification
of EL students
2) Develop students to have the knowledge and skills to ensure proficiency in Algebra
by the end of 8th grade
3) Promote technological literacy as an integral educational tool for all students and staff
4) Preserve essential programs and services for students by promoting cost saving
initiatives, exploring green technologies, evaluating assets and exploring revenue
options to maintain solvency
Five years from now a visitor coming to this school district would see technology supporting
learning and teaching. The plan details current access by teachers and students, current use of
technology to support teaching and learning. The five-year plan also details the districts
curricular goals to support this plan. Lastly the Ontario Montclair School District shows
acquiring technology skills and information literacy skills. After reading the OMSD technology
plan there would be an improvement for teachers and especially for students.
2. Has the district established levels of proficiency in technology by grade levels? If so, are
these proficiencies woven into the academic curriculum? Are they taught in separate
stand-alone technology?
The OMSD Technology Plan does not establish levels of proficiency in technology by grade levels. The
OMSD establishes levels of proficiency by, establishing a clear connection between curriculum
development processes integration which requires the district to reach an agreement about the role of
technology and how it is applied to learning. Throughout the school system Common Core technology
integration will be identified in several different areas that will have a positive impact on the students,
teachers and principals.
Benchmark 3d.2
Year 1: By June 2015, 55% of students will be able to select and apply the
appropriate technology tools and resources utilizing critical thinking and 21st century
skills to analyze, create and present on selected topics.
Year 2: By June 2016, 70% of students will be able to select and apply the
appropriate technology tools and resources utilizing critical thinking and 21st century
skills to analyze, create and present on selected topics.
Year 3: By June 2017, 85% of students will be able to select and apply the
appropriate technology tools and resources utilizing critical thinking and 21st century
skills to analyze, create and present on selected topics.
Section 3e. Acquiring technology skills and information literacy skills
Goal 3e.1. Literacy Skills
Students will become proficient at locating, accessing, and evaluating information and
resources (including online reference databases and practice tests) on the Internet. Search
strategies will be taught as appropriate per grade level.
Objective 3e.1
By June 2017, 85% of students will use grade level appropriate technology to demonstrate
competency by engaging in at least one appropriate research based project per trimester as
defined by Common Core State Standards, requiring them to conduct effective searches and
demonstrate their ability to locate, access, and evaluate information and resources from the
Internet.
Objective 3e.1 Benchmarks
Year 1: By June 2015, 55% of students will use grade level appropriate technology to
demonstrate competency by engaging in at least one appropriate research based project
per trimester as defined by Common Core State Standards, requiring them to conduct
effective searches and demonstrate their ability to locate, access, and evaluate
information and resources from the Internet.
Year 2: By June 2016, 70% of students will use grade level appropriate technology to
demonstrate competency by engaging in at least one appropriate research based project
per trimester as defined by Common Core State Standards, requiring them to conduct
effective searches and demonstrate their ability to locate, access, and evaluate
information and resources from the Internet.
Year 3: By June 2017, 85% of students will use grade level appropriate technology to
demonstrate competency by engaging in at least one appropriate research based project
per trimester as defined by Common Core State Standards, requiring them to conduct
effective searches and demonstrate their ability to locate, access, and evaluate
information and resources from the Internet.
Implement the use of social media tools to increase parent awareness and participation in school
and District-level activities. Encourage social media pilot programs, such as the use of Twitter
for parent communication
Objective 3j.2
By June 2017, schools and the District will use social media tools to increase parent awareness
and participation in school and District-level activities.
Benchmarks 3j.2
Year 1: By June 2015, the District will use social media tools to increase two-way
communication between home and school.
Year 2: By June 2016, schools will use social media tools to increase two-way
communication between home and school.
Year 3: By June 2017, schools and the District will use social media tools to increase
parent awareness and participation in school and District-level activities
4. Does the district have an inventory system or does one need to be developed to track the type and
age of hardware?
The OMSD does have an inventory system- The district has a total of 2500 thin client computer
devices that are utilized for web based research, instructional web sites and creating,
keyboarding and for productivity apps such as Microsoft Office.
School Name
Enrollment (K-8)
CBEDS 2012
Student Computers
Ratio
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
540
713
729
401
626
663
200
117
96
73
87
65
3:1
6:1
8:1
6:1
7:1
10:1
Arroyo
Berlyn
Bon View
Buena Vista
Central
Corona
7. De Anza
8. Del Norte
9. Edison
10. El Camino
11. Elderberry
12. Euclid
13.
Hawthorne
14.
Haynes
15.
Howard
16.
Kingsley
17.
Lehigh
18.
Lincoln
19.
Mariposa
20.
Mission
21.
Monte
Vista
22.
Montera
23.
Moreno
24.
Oaks
25.
Ramona
26.
Serrano
27.
Sultana
28.
Vernon
29.
Vina
Danks
30.
Vineyard
31.
Vista
Grande
32.
Wiltsey
District
604
750
861
593
828
591
738
869
632
829
709
637
701
756
731
611
560
897
792
741
833
808
925
760
507
775
22,710
172
198
27
201
156
42
260
20
208
102
339
79
148
379
118
148
82
153
93
100
88
163
241
109
34
234
4,532
4:1
4:1
32:1
3:1
5:1
14:1
3:1
44:1
3:1
8:1
2:1
8:1
4:1
2:1
6:1
4:1
7:1
6:1
9:1
7:1
10:1
5:1
3:1
7:1
15:1
3:1
5:1
5. Are assistive technologies available to students with special needs as well as to other
students, such as English language learners, who might benefit from the use of those
devices and software? A description of access is described on pages 25-27
A variety of classes are provided to address all levels of language proficiency, including
listening, speaking, reading, and writing, based on the level and needs of the student.
All schools within the district with special populations will implement the use of appropriate
technology including hardware, software and online learning tools. The technologies available
have been selected to fulfill the needs of special education students, as specified in their IEP.
All students within the OMSD have equitable access to technology that promotes student
performance and academic achievement. Based on special needs students IEP evaluation
appropriate technologies are provided. Specific instruction for English learners and Special
Needs students will be provided access to necessary technologies regardless of any limitations,
permanent or temporary. This includes injuries, illness or any long-term physical conditions,
learning disabilities or health impairment. These technologies include the use of built in
accessibility features.
Each school within the district maintain equitable student to computer ratios in every classroom.
Technologies are shared equitably by all students with necessary provisions for special learners.
OMSDs Special Needs Admin Team provides an ongoing process to evaluate technical support
needs and appropriate products and resources for Special Education students. This ensures all
special education technology work orders are handled in a timely fashion. In addition, selected
products, software, online learning tools and resources are meeting the needs identified in the
IEP.
6. What replacement cycle has been built into the plan? Will adequate funding be set aside
for replacements? Replacement cycle and funding information can be found on pages 51-67.
Computers 5 years or older are considered obsolete, depleting network and technical support
resources, and will be replaced or upgraded as quickly as funds allow. Technicians will provide
site administrators with specific recommendations based on hardware performance.
Technology budgeting has been integrated into the District general budget process. Based on site
level needs analyses conducted by the Information Services Department and the school principal,
site and District level funds from the aforementioned sources will be used to support the plan.
The plan gives a detailed list of clear benchmarks and a timeline for obtaining the hardware,
infrastructure, learning resources and technical support required to support the other plan
components.
The deal with Dell Computer Company also generates an obsolete equipment replacement report
that provides valuable information to assist with decisions of replacing old equipment.
Ongoing activities and funding sources for replacement cycle includes:
Activity
Timeline
Develop equipment
replacement cycle for
technology refresh
2015-2016
Upgrade Wireless
Infrastructure to support 1:1
Density and Common Core
2014-2015
Funding Sources
2015-2016
Ongoing
2014-2015
7. How does the tech plan address technology proficiencies and information literacy skills?
The plan clearly identifies literacy skills and technology proficiencies.
Objective
3d.2
Technology
Tools
By
June
2017,
85%
of
students
will
select
and
effectively
apply
the
appropriate
technology
tools
and
resources
utilizing
critical
thinking
and
21st
century
skills
to
analyze,
create
and
present
on
selected
topics.
Benchmark
3d.2
Year
1:
By
June
2015,
55%
of
students
will
be
able
to
select
and
apply
the
appropriate
technology
tools
and
resources
utilizing
critical
thinking
and
21st
century
skills
to
analyze,
create
and
present
on
selected
topics.
Year
2:
By
June
2016,
70%
of
students
will
be
able
to
select
and
apply
the
appropriate
technology
tools
and
resources
utilizing
critical
thinking
and
21st
century
skills
to
analyze,
create
and
present
on
selected
topics.
Year
3:
By
June
2017,
85%
of
students
will
be
able
to
select
and
apply
the
appropriate
technology
tools
and
resources
utilizing
critical
thinking
and
21st
century
skills
to
analyze,
create
and
present
on
selected
topics.
Activity
Timeline
Person(s)
Responsible
Teachers
Site
administrators
Library
staff
Monitoring
and
Evaluation
Classroom
walk-
throughs
and
observations
Evaluation
Instrument
Data
from
classroom
observations
Utilize
a
wide
range
of
electronic
texts
with
annotation
capability
to
help
organize
and
understanding
information
Use
self-created
audio
and
video
recordings
to
engage
an
audience
Ongoing
Use
video
conference
tools
and
access
multimedia
resources
for
virtual
field
trips
and
simulations
that
are
otherwise
inaccessible
Create,
collaborate
and
present
using
tools
such
as
learning
management
systems,
wikis,
blogs,
digital
media,
visual
displays,
discussion
boards,
word
processing,
and
spreadsheets
Complete
assessments
using
appropriate
technology
Ongoing
Teachers
Site
administrators
Library
staff
Classroom
walk-
throughs
and
observations
Data
from
classroom
observations
Web-usage logs
Ongoing
Teachers
Classroom
walk-
throughs
and
observations
Data
from
classroom
observations
Teacher
created
rubrics
Teachers
Director
of
Information
Services
Teacher
created
lesson
plans
Student work
Library
staff
Ongoing
with
minimum
of
once
per
trimester
Teachers
Ongoing
beginning
2014-2015
school
year
Site administrators
Site administrators
Gradebooks
Library staff
Director
II
of
Research
and
Assessment
Test administrator
SBAC reports
Timeline
Person(s)
Responsible
Monitoring,
Evaluation
and
Evaluation
Instrument
Estimated Cost4
June
2014
Teachers
and
administrators
will
participate
in
the
evaluation
of
student
research
reports,
presentations,
and
work
samples
during
the
report
process
June
2014
Community Events
Trimester Administrators
Teachers
Common
Core
and
SBAC
Tools
Site
administrators
Library
staff
Common
Core,
E-Rate
and
CIPA
training
from
Common
Sense
Media
and
other
sources
Projects
8. How will the school district know whether implementation of this plan has made a
positive impact on teaching and learning?
The district has selected to review data and feedback from all committee members to monitor the
success of the approved plan. Key evaluation components will consist of district technology
committee meetings, district created tech survey, staff proficiency survey, professional
development survey, classroom observation and walkthroughs, Common Core Assessments,
Student Technology survey, and Parent Technology Survey. These components will be used to
create an Annual update of Technology Report.
Section 7a. Overall progress and impact evaluation
Data and feedback information from all components of the plan will be compiled and analyzed
by the District Educational Technology Lead Committee comprised of Directors of Learning and
Teaching, Professional Development Staff, and Curriculum and Instruction.
implementation issues.
An annual summary report with recommendations will be developed by Learning and
Teaching and Information Services Departments, submitted to Cabinet for review, and
shared with stakeholders via the local school board meeting and District website.
Revisions to this plan will be made available online.
9. Does the plan address a time frame by which the district proposes to implement the
various components of the plan?
Yes. This plan gives detailed clarification in addressing a time frame by which the district
proposes to implement various components. The Ontario-Montclair School District Plan is also
known as a 3-year implementation plan. Moreover there are sections within this plan that
specifically touch on this basis of time implementation:
Section 3d: Teaching and learning goals
This section list objective and benchmark goals for student learning. At the end of each
benchmark goal, there is a section that discusses the activity, timeline, person(s) responsible,
monitoring and evaluation, and evaluation instrument for these purposes.
10. Do you think this plan has addressed issues such as equity for all students? Please
explain your thinking.
I do believe this plan has addressed the issues such as equality for all students.
Section 3c: District curricular goals to support plan addresses the mission, expectations, goals,
and initiatives. Within this section, there is a breakdown of the students that are supported under
the plan of this mission:
! English Learners (EL)
! Special Education (SPED)
! Response to Instruction and Intervention (RtI2)
! Advancement via Individual Determination (AVID)
! Gifted and Talented Education (GATE)
! Magnet/Academy Schools/Distinctive Schools
! Community and Family Services (i.e., Family Solutions and Montclair Community
Collaborative)
Additionally,
section 3h: Description of access for all students discusses the importances of
students with special needs with, appropriate technologies based on recommendations in their
Individual Education Plans (IEP). Secondly, here is an excerpt from what other services the
Ontario-Montclair School District provides for various learners:
~The instructional program for our English Learners is based on the most current research of
effective programs. Specific instruction for English Learners occurs daily during scheduled ELD
time where students are leveled according to their language needs. The ELD programs utilized
in OMSD are SRA in grades kindergartenthird, OMSD HM ELD in grades thirdsixth, and
11. Does this plan provide tools to help lower the achievement gap? Please explain your
thinking.
I do believe that this technology plan provides tools to assist in lowering the achievement gap.
For instance, the Ontario Montclair School District provides information on how, The Student
Outreach and Academic Recovery (S.O.A.R.) is a flexible, comprehensive program to meet the
needs of expelled and other at-risk students. Students who display a history of academic
difficulty, attendance problems and/or social emotional dysfunction are referred to S.O.A.R.
Further, the plan went on to discuss, All schools with special education populations will
implement the use of appropriate technology, appropriate hardware, software and online
learning tools and that are designed to meet the needs of special education students, as specified
in their Individual Education Plan (IEP).
The information presented above exemplifies the importance in providing services to allow all
students, regardless if they have special needs or are at-risk youth, with the opportunity to
achieve and engage with technology. That is such an integral purpose because all students
deserve the opportunities to grow and reach goals that they may have never thought were
possible. Finally, with the incorporation of technology, students have the opportunity to use
appropriate technology for their needs and interact with the curriculum accordingly.
12. If you could recommend some improvements to your district's technology team
regarding this plan, what would they be and why?
One improvement that I would recommend would be to illustrate more statistics on how teachers
are using the technology resources to effectively focus on the technology plans vision. Having
the opportunity to read over the master technology plan, I have witnessed that technology plans
must focus on the given vision at hand. Developing a vision for teachers to focus on is essential
as well as with the specific guidelines that the plan has mapped out for teachers to follow. It is
critical to showcase statistics on how different school groupings are doing (i.e., special
education, gifted learners, AVID learners) with the schools technology plan. This specifically
would have been of assistance for me to view just so that I could see how each grouping was
following along with the technology plan that has been implemented.