-WRITING UP AN INVESTIGATIONUse this format to guide you through the write-up, by completing each of the boxes under the

questions. At the end you should be able to remove the titles to each of the boxes and you will have
the write-up. The holistic quality and presentation of the write up are assessed in Criterion 5:
COMMUNICATION.
WHAT IS THE TITLE OF THE INVESTIGATION? WHAT DATE WAS IT CARRIED
OUT? BY WHO?
The title is: is there a conection between the vital gas Exchange and the weight of people? The
27.03.15 carried out by daniel

INTRODUCTION. HOW WAS THIS INVESTIGATION MADE SPECIAL OR UNIQUE?

(Criterion 1: PERSONAL ENGAGEMENT)
The investigation was special because we made weight, which no one else did.

PREPARATION. WHAT RESEARCH AND PREPARATION WAS COMPLETED BEFORE

DOING THE INVESTIGATION? (Criterion 2: EXPLORATION):
We investigate the vital lung capacity and the weight of every people.

CONSIDERATIONS. WHAT SAFETY, ENVIRONMENTAL OR ETHICAL

CONSIDERATIONS WERE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT? (Criteria 2: EXPLORATION):
Washing the blowing measurer every time another people wasgoing to blow. We did it out side
so we have a better oxygen breath

RESULTS. DATA TABLE. Include uncertainties, errors and measurement considerations. (Criterion
3: ANALYSIS):

nicole
isabella
valentina
susie
melissa
nathalie
ana
rebe

49
57
70
54
50
55
42
60

2,8
3,2
3
2,8
2,7
2
2,2
3

2
weight
vital lung
person
kg
capacity
rodrigo
41
daniel
60
marco
50
theo
70
nicolas
46
Ignacio
61
elijah
55
ale
70
galo
74
mateo
65
dylan
50
carlos
75
nicole
49
isabella
57
valentina
70
susie
54
melissa
50
nathalie
55
ana
42
rebe
60

2,4
3,4
3,2
4,6
3,2
3,9
2,6
3,3
2,5
3,2
2,6
3,9
2,8
3,2
3
2,8
2,7
2
2,2
3

TREATMENT OF RESULTS. (Graphs, statistical analysis, etc.) Take into account uncertainties
and errors of measurement. (Criterion 3: ANALYSIS):

CONCLUSION. STATE and JUSTIFY (based on the results and the analysis of the results) a valid
conclusion, which SUPPORTS or REJECTS the HYPOTHESIS. (Criterion 4: EVALUATION):

REFLECTION. What were the strengths and weaknesses of the investigation? Include
considerations of methodology and measurement techniques and issues. (Criterion 4:
EVALUATION):

RECOMMENDATIONS. Make recommendations for correcting methodology and measurement

issues. Suggest follow-up investigation(s). (Criterion 4: EVALUATION):

BIBLIOGRAPHY. (Criterion 2: EXPLORATION):