Should Scientists Pursue The Possibility of Human Immortality

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Shouldscientistspursuethepossibilityofhumanimmortality

Whatifyoucouldliveforever,couldneverage?ByusingcellsfromtheTurritopsis
nutriculajellyfishinahumanwecanstophumansfromaging.Idonotsupporttheresearchto
provethisexperiment.
Scientistsshouldnotpursuethistheorybecausebecomingimmortalgoesagainst
manypeoplesreligion.Almosteveryonebelievesinanotherlifeafterdeath.Topossiblynever
diemaygiveyounochancetoexplorethosebeliefs.Ifeelitwillcausemuchunnecessary
controversyaroundtheworld.
Anotherreasonisthatwecannotbesurewhatcouldhappenwhenweputthesecells
intoahuman.Itcouldchangethecellsthatmakeushuman.Thementalbeingoftheperson
couldchange.Cellsofjellyfishdonotbelongwithcellsofahuman.Ithinkitisbestfor
mankindtonotcontinuethisresearch.
Forevery8secondsapersonisborn,andforevery12secondsapersondies.1.357
billionpeopleliveinChina,1.252inIndia,and315.5intheU.S.Theworldspopulationis
rising,Thedeathrateislowerthanthebirthrate.Ifpeopledontdiebutpeoplearestillborn
theworldwithhavetoomanypeopletoknowwhattodowith.Withhighpopulationscomes
morepollution,garbage,andshortageofnaturalresourceslikeoil.
Sites
http://www.nationalgeographic.com/eye/overpopulation/effect.html
http://www.lef.org/magazine/2009/8/TurningonImmortalityTheDebateOverTelomer
aseActivation/Page01
http://www.philosophyofreligion.info/argumentsforatheism/problemswithimmortality/
http://www.philosophyofreligion.info/argumentsforatheism/problemswithimmortality/

You might also like