UNIVERSITI KUALA LUMPUR

MALAYSIAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL

& BIOENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY

ASSESSMENT OF VIDEO PRESENTATION (MINI PROJECT/CASE STUDY)

Name of presenters :
1. DINESH KUMAR VIJEYAN
2. PAVITHRAN KRISHNAN
3. SUBASHINI PANNERSELUM
4. THEFYE PRASAD MOGNNA SUNTHAR

55201113611
55201113673
55201113607
55201113688

Evaluate the video presentation based on parameter indicated below. Provide rating to indicate the
extent to which each of the parameters is followed. Rating 5 indicates clear demonstration of the
parameter and 1 indicates that parameter was ignored.
EVALUATION OF PRESENTATION
N
o
1.

Criteria

1
1
1

2
2
2

3
3
3

4
4
4

5
5
5

1
1
1
1
1

2
2
2
2
2

3
3
3
3
3

4
4
4
4
4

5
5
5
5
5

1
1

2
2

3
3

4
4

5
5

1
1
1

2
2
2

3
3
3

4
4
4

5
5
5

Presentation structure

2.

Introduction (story flow)

Visual design and production quality
Appearance (appropriate dress)
Contents of Presentation

3.

Originality & preparation of materials

Clarity and structure of explanations
Presentation is coordinated
Appropriateness of topics discussed
Understanding the purpose of project
carried out
Using time well
Style of Delivery

Eye contact and body action

Interpersonal ability & communication
skills
Voice clarity
Interesting / poor
Well organized and sequenced
VIDEO MARKS:
REPORT MARKS:
TOTAL MARKS :

Name of the evaluator : Mdm. Azzyati