Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RSPS 8th Edition
RSPS 8th Edition
Arthur B. Laffer
Stephen Moore
Jonathan Williams
Rich States, Poor States: ALEC-Laffer State Economic Competitiveness Index has been published by the
American Legislative Exchange Council, Americas largest nonpartisan, voluntary membership organization of state legislators. Made up of nearly one-third of Americas state elected officials, the Council
provides a unique opportunity for state lawmakers, business leaders and citizen organizations from
around the country to share experiences and develop state-based, pro-growth models based on academic research, existing state policy and proven business practices.
The American Legislative Exchange Council is classified by the Internal Revenue Service as a 501(c)(3)
nonprofit and public policy and educational organization. Individuals, philanthropic foundations, corporations, companies, or associations are eligible to support the Councils work through tax-deductible gifts.
ii
STEPHEN MOORE
Stephen Moore, who formerly wrote on the economy and public policy for The Wall Street Journal, is
a Distinguished Visiting Fellow, Project for Economic Growth, at The Heritage Foundation. Moore was
previously the founder and president of the Club for Growth and founded the Free Enterprise Fund. Over
the years, Moore has served as a senior economist at the Congressional Joint Economic Committee and
as a senior economics fellow at the Cato Institute. He was also a consultant to the National Economic
Commission in 1987 and research director for President Reagans Commission on Privatization. Steve is a
Fox News contributor along with writing regularly for National Review, Forbes, Investors Business Daily,
The Washington Times, and Orange County Register. Steve holds a masters of arts in economics from
George Mason University. He has authored numerous books, including Whos the Fairest of Them All, Its
Getting Better All the Time, Still an Open Door, and An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth
of States.
JONATHAN WILLIAMS
Jonathan Williams is the vice president for the Center for State Fiscal Reform at the American Legislative
Exchange Council (ALEC), where he works with state policymakers, congressional leaders, and members
of the private sector to develop fiscal policy solutions for the states. Prior to joining ALEC, Williams served
as staff economist at the nonpartisan Tax Foundation, authoring numerous tax policy studies. Williamss
work has appeared in many publications including The Wall Street Journal, Forbes, and Investors Business
Daily. He has written for the Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation at Harvards Kennedy
School of Government. In addition, Williams was a contributing author of In Defense of Capitalism
(Northwood University Press). Williams has testified before numerous legislative bodies and spoken to
audiences across America. He is frequent guest on talk radio shows and has appeared on numerous
television outlets, including the PBS NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, Fox Business News, and Bloomberg
News. He serves on the board of directors for State Budget Solutions, a non-partisan good government
group that pursues fiscal reform in the states. Williams was also the recipient of the prestigious Ludwig
von Mises Award in Economics.
State Rankings
he Economic Outlook Ranking is a forecast based on a states current standing in 15 state policy variables. Each of these factors is influenced directly by state lawmakers through the legislative process.
Generally speaking, states that spend lessespecially on income transfer programs, and states that tax
lessparticularly on productive activities such as working or investingexperience higher growth rates than
states that tax and spend more.
The Economic Performance Ranking is a backward-looking measure based on a states performance on three
important variables: State Gross Domestic Product, Absolute Domestic Migration, and Non-Farm Payroll Employmentall of which are highly influenced by state policy. This ranking details states individual performances over
the past 10 years based on this economic data.
State
Rank
Utah
State
26
Louisiana
North Dakota
27
Missouri
Indiana
28
Massachusetts
North Carolina
29
New Hampshire
Arizona
30
Kentucky
Idaho
31
Nebraska
Georgia
32
South Carolina
Wyoming
33
Maryland
South Dakota
34
New Mexico
10
Nevada
35
Washington
11
Texas
36
West Virginia
12
Virginia
37
Hawaii
13
Wisconsin
38
Delaware
14
Alaska
39
Rhode Island
15
Florida
40
Illinois
16
Oklahoma
41
Pennsylvania
17
Tennessee
42
Maine
18
Kansas
43
Montana
19
Alabama
44
California
20
Mississippi
45
Oregon
21
Colorado
46
New Jersey
22
Arkansas
47
Connecticut
23
Ohio
48
Minnesota
24
Michigan
49
Vermont
25
Iowa
50
New York
State
Texas
North Dakota
Utah
Oklahoma
Wyoming
Washington
Oregon
Montana
Colorado
North Carolina
Alaska
Arizona
Idaho
South Dakota
Nevada
Virginia
Nebraska
Hawaii
West Virginia
South Carolina
Iowa
Arkansas
Florida
Tennessee
Georgia
New Mexico
Kentucky
Kansas
Alabama
Minnesota
Maryland
Delaware
Louisiana
New York
Massachusetts
New Hampshire
California
Vermont
Pennsylvania
Indiana
Mississippi
Missouri
Wisconsin
Maine
Connecticut
Illinois
Rhode Island
New Jersey
Ohio
Michigan
Non-Farm Payroll
2
1
3
6
4
10
17
7
8
14
5
12
9
11
16
18
15
13
26
21
19
35
25
31
28
30
34
24
41
23
29
33
36
20
22
32
27
40
37
42
45
38
39
46
43
44
49
47
48
50
www.alec.org
69
Alabama
Connecticut
29
19
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
42.4% Rank: 29
AL
U.S.
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
15 16 17 20 21 17 20
Variable
Data
Rank
4.02%
13
4.23%
-$1.81
$14.97
$24.34
32
$22.63
41
No
-$0.04
27
7.6%
24
583.4
41
52.8
43
$7.25
$1.81
22
Yes
34
0%
-2%
-4%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
105,798
Rank: 13
(in thousands)
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
-5
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
1.8%
Rank: 41
AL
U.S.
4%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
-6%
Right-to-Work State?
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Alaska
Delaware
11
14
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
84.7% Rank: 3
AK
U.S.
15%
37 38 22 29 29 21 18
Variable
Data
Rank
0.00%
9.40%
44
$0.00
$42.08
40
$5.81
$14.00
No
-$18.85
5.1%
753.9
49
69.1
13
$7.75
26
$2.68
46
No
50
14
10%
5%
0%
-5%
-10%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
-8,750
Rank: 30
(in thousands)
5
4
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
13.0%
Rank: 5
AK
U.S.
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
Right-to-Work State?
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
www.alec.org
71
Arizona
Connecticut
12
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
45.2% Rank: 24
AZ
U.S.
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
6 3 3 12 9 6 7
Variable
Data
Rank
4.54%
14
6.00%
15
$10.62
32
$29.21
23
$36.74
46
$12.58
No
-$0.24
20
9.8%
39
427.8
66.8
17
$8.05
33
$1.60
14
Yes
-2%
-4%
-6%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
584,103
Rank: 4
(in thousands)
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
9.1%
12
13
Rank: 12
AZ
U.S.
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
-2%
-4%
-6%
-8%
Right-to-Work State?
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Arkansas
Delaware
22
22
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
56.1% Rank: 14
AR
U.S.
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
11 12 13 13 11 24 26
Variable
Data
Rank
6.90%
32
6.50%
22
$14.91
40
$18.81
$36.11
45
$17.48
23
No
-$0.31
18
5.3%
570.3
40
57.2
35
$7.50
22
$1.08
Yes
14
0%
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
76,520
(in thousands)
Rank: 17
25
20
15
10
5
0
-5
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
2.8%
12
13
Rank: 35
AR
U.S.
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
Right-to-Work State?
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
www.alec.org
73
California
Connecticut
37
44
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
43.5% Rank: 27
CA
U.S.
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
42 43 46 47 38 47 47
Variable
Data
Rank
13.30%
50
8.84%
40
$38.34
50
$29.72
25
$23.60
27
$16.21
16
No
-$0.47
10
10.5%
42
446.3
50.6
47
$9.00
44
$3.48
50
No
50
-2%
-4%
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Rank: 49
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
(in thousands)
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Rank: 27
CA
U.S.
4%
2%
0%
Right-to-Work State?
-2%
-4%
-6%
-8%
04
74
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Colorado
Delaware
21
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
51.3% Rank: 18
CO
U.S.
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
9 2 2 6 8 16 22
Variable
Data
Rank
4.63%
16
4.63%
$6.36
21
$29.87
27
$23.35
26
$13.94
No
$0.25
37
11.8%
47
524.4
24
64.2
23
$8.23
38
$1.50
10
No
50
0%
-2%
-4%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
272,722
(in thousands)
Rank: 9
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
-5
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
11.6%
Rank: 8
CO
U.S.
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
-6%
Right-to-Work State?
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
www.alec.org
75
Connecticut
Connecticut
45
47
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
36.6% Rank: 41
40 32 36 35 44 43 44
10%
CT
U.S.
8%
6%
Variable
Data
Rank
6.70%
30
9.00%
42
$7.67
27
$44.80
43
$17.98
14
$17.83
26
Yes
50
$1.66
46
7.8%
26
516.9
22
63.8
25
$9.15
47
$2.87
49
No
50
14
4%
2%
0%
-2%
-4%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
-140,974
Rank: 42
(in thousands)
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
1.1%
Rank: 43
CT
U.S.
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
-6%
Right-to-Work State?
76
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
Delaware
Delaware
32
38
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
38.1% Rank: 38
DE
U.S.
10%
8%
6%
31 31 37 34 34 30 27
Variable
Data
Rank
7.85%
40
10.35%
47
$13.70
38
$17.59
$0.00
$50.16
50
Yes
50
$1.24
45
8.1%
29
542.7
32
75.8
$7.75
26
$2.31
42
No
50
4%
2%
0%
-2%
-4%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
42,811
Rank: 20
(in thousands)
7
6
4
3
2
1
0
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
3.2%
12
13
Rank: 33
DE
U.S.
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
-6%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
www.alec.org
77
Florida
23
15
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
37.0% Rank: 40
FL
U.S.
10%
16 11 5 10 13 9 16
Variable
Data
Rank
0.00%
5.50%
14
$0.00
$31.65
30
$27.32
36
$21.53
39
No
-$0.15
22
9.4%
36
441.0
55.3
41
$8.05
33
$1.82
23
Yes
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
-2%
-4%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
960,492
Rank: 2
(in thousands)
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
-50
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
5.3%
12
13
Rank: 25
FL
U.S.
6%
4%
2%
0%
Right-to-Work State?
-2%
-4%
-6%
-8%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
Georgia
25
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
35.6% Rank: 42
GA
U.S.
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
8 8 9 11 10 8 9
Variable
Data
Rank
6.00%
27
6.00%
15
$6.53
23
$28.56
21
$25.25
34
$11.18
No
-$0.30
19
7.5%
18
512.6
20
64.0
24
$7.25
$1.75
19
Yes
34
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
437,897
Rank: 5
(in thousands)
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
-20
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
4.8%
12
13
Rank: 28
GA
U.S.
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
-6%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
www.alec.org
79
Hawaii
18
37
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
54.9% Rank: 15
HI
U.S.
10%
41 41 39 46 46 40 36
Variable
Data
Rank
11.00%
48
6.40%
21
$13.54
37
$21.66
$47.74
50
$26.29
46
Yes
50
-$0.57
7.4%
17
515.7
21
62.5
29
$7.75
26
$1.85
24
No
50
14
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
-2%
-4%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
-30,719
Rank: 33
(in thousands)
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
8.9%
Rank: 13
HI
U.S.
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
-6%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
Idaho
13
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
51.4% Rank: 17
ID
U.S.
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
10 14 7 5 6 7 5
Variable
Data
Rank
7.40%
37
7.40%
30
$13.40
36
$25.57
14
$22.48
24
$15.18
11
No
-$0.34
17
5.4%
496.0
14
70.5
$7.25
$2.01
37
Yes
14
-2%
-4%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
92,462
Rank: 15
(in thousands)
25
20
15
10
5
0
-5
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
11.1%
12
13
Rank: 9
ID
U.S.
6%
4%
2%
0%
Right-to-Work State?
-2%
-4%
-6%
-8%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
www.alec.org
81
Illinois
46
40
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
35.6% Rank: 43
IL
U.S.
8%
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
43 44 47 44 48 48 48
Variable
Data
Rank
3.75%
12
7.75%
32
$1.08
14
$44.14
42
$16.66
10
$21.26
37
Yes
50
-$2.99
10.2%
40
501.0
15
51.3
46
$8.25
39
$2.35
44
No
50
34
0%
-1%
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
-646,867
Rank: 48
(in thousands)
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
-60
-70
-80
-90
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
0.5%
Rank: 44
IL
U.S.
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
-6%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
Indiana
40
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
39.9% Rank: 34
IN
U.S.
8%
12 17 20 16 24 14 3
Variable
Data
Rank
5.07%
20
7.00%
27
$0.68
13
$26.68
17
$27.23
35
$18.54
28
No
-$0.37
15
8.6%
31
486.3
12
69.0
14
$7.25
$1.06
Yes
14
6%
4%
2%
0%
-2%
-4%
-6%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
-35,692
Rank: 34
(in thousands)
10
-5
-10
-15
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
1.8%
12
13
Rank: 42
IN
U.S.
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
-6%
-7%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
www.alec.org
83
Iowa
21
25
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
54.8% Rank: 16
IA
U.S.
12%
10%
8%
25 35 28 23 22 25 25
Variable
Data
Rank
5.42%
23
9.90%
46
$11.87
33
$34.02
34
$24.09
30
$16.92
20
Yes
50
-$0.35
16
5.1%
552.4
35
69.5
10
$7.25
$1.88
27
Yes
14
6%
4%
2%
0%
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
-19,319
Rank: 31
(in thousands)
1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
6.7%
12
13
Rank: 19
IA
U.S.
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
Kansas
28
18
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
48.8% Rank: 21
KS
U.S.
8%
29 24 25 27 26 11 15
Variable
Data
Rank
4%
4.60%
15
2%
7.00%
27
$7.02
25
$31.82
32
$30.11
38
$12.34
No
-$0.57
9.0%
35
695.4
48
70.6
$7.25
$1.55
12
Yes
34
6%
0%
-2%
-4%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
-57,018
Rank: 38
(in thousands)
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
5.5%
12
13
Rank: 24
KS
U.S.
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
www.alec.org
85
Kentucky
27
30
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
42.4% Rank: 30
KY
U.S.
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
44 36 40 40 39 38 39
Variable
Data
Rank
8.20%
42
6.00%
15
$5.44
19
$20.29
$19.78
17
$20.57
33
Yes
50
-$0.12
25
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
65,970
Rank: 18
(in thousands)
20
15
10
13.6%
50
537.4
28
56.8
38
$7.25
$1.51
11
No
50
14
-5
-10
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
2.9%
12
13
Rank: 34
KY
U.S.
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
Louisiana
33
26
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
60.8% Rank: 11
LA
U.S.
20%
15%
10%
5%
24 18 16 15 19 28 29
Variable
Data
Rank
3.62%
11
5.20%
13
$10.17
30
$20.10
$36.78
47
$16.61
17
No
-$0.02
28
10.3%
41
555.5
36
46.5
49
$7.25
$2.23
41
Yes
0%
-5%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
-234,082
Rank: 44
(in thousands)
50
0
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
2.7%
12
13
Rank: 36
LA
U.S.
6%
4%
2%
0%
Right-to-Work State?
-2%
-4%
-6%
-8%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
www.alec.org
87
Maine
Maine
44
42
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
30.0% Rank: 49
ME
U.S.
7%
6%
5%
4%
46 47 44 48 47 41 40
Variable
Data
Rank
7.95%
41
8.93%
41
$19.47
47
$45.50
45
$20.38
20
$19.59
30
Yes
50
-$0.17
21
6.0%
10
548.0
33
69.2
12
$7.50
22
$2.15
38
No
50
14
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
-1,063
Rank: 27
(in thousands)
5
4
3
2
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
-1.0%
12
13
Rank: 46
ME
U.S.
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
Maryland
Maryland
31
33
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
48.9% Rank: 20
MD
U.S.
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
28 28 29 21 20 35 34
Variable
Data
Rank
8.95%
43
8.25%
37
$5.03
18
$25.95
15
$13.13
$18.40
27
Yes
50
$0.20
35
6.3%
13
503.2
17
58.3
33
$8.00
29
$1.64
16
No
50
34
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
-140,571
Cumulative 2004-2013
Rank: 41
(in thousands)
5
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
-35
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
4.5%
12
13
Rank: 29
MD
U.S.
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
www.alec.org
89
Massachusetts
35
28
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
41.1% Rank: 32
MA
U.S.
7%
6%
5%
4%
22 26 32 24 25 29 28
Variable
Data
Rank
5.15%
21
8.00%
35
$3.02
16
$37.28
39
$13.86
$11.87
Yes
50
$0.62
41
10.9%
44
482.8
11
66.3
19
$9.00
44
$1.17
No
50
14
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
-200,230
Rank: 43
(in thousands)
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
-60
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
5.8%
12
13
Rank: 22
MA
U.S.
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
-6%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
Michigan
50
24
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
14.4% Rank: 50
MI
U.S.
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
-2%
17 34 26 25 17 20 12
Variable
Data
Rank
6.65%
29
8.00%
35
$2.27
15
$35.50
35
$23.88
29
$15.51
13
No
$0.66
42
-4%
-6%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
-628,472
Rank: 47
(in thousands)
-20
-40
-60
-80
8.3%
30
438.5
63.0
27
$8.15
37
$1.68
17
Yes
-100
-120
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
-6.4%
12
13
Rank: 50
MI
U.S.
4%
2%
0%
-2%
Right-to-Work State?
-4%
-6%
-8%
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
www.alec.org
91
Minnesota
30
48
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
42.8% Rank: 28
MN
U.S.
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
39 40 38 37 41 46 46
Variable
Data
Rank
9.85%
45
9.80%
45
$18.42
45
$31.75
31
$20.44
21
$24.58
45
Yes
50
$2.36
49
7.5%
20
509.7
19
71.4
$8.00
29
$1.99
31
No
50
34
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
-68,644
Rank: 39
(in thousands)
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
5.5%
12
13
Rank: 23
MN
U.S.
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
Mississippi
41
20
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
41.8% Rank: 31
MS
U.S.
8%
19 19 18 19 15 10 14
Variable
Data
Rank
4%
5.00%
18
2%
5.00%
$7.53
26
$26.51
16
$31.41
40
$20.79
36
No
-$0.05
26
6.2%
11
644.9
47
46.6
48
$7.25
$1.59
13
Yes
6%
0%
-2%
-4%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
-41,744
Rank: 35
(in thousands)
-5
-10
-15
-20
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
0.0%
12
13
Rank: 45
MS
U.S.
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
www.alec.org
93
Missouri
Missouri
42
27
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
34.0% Rank: 46
MO
U.S.
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
25 23 15 9 7 23 24
Variable
Data
Rank
7.00%
35
6.16%
19
$14.00
39
$24.59
13
$22.30
23
$15.37
12
No
$0.00
29
9.0%
34
525.0
25
57.8
34
$7.65
25
$1.98
30
No
50
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
-6,229
(in thousands)
Rank: 28
15
10
0
-5
-10
-15
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
2.5%
12
13
Rank: 38
MO
U.S.
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
Montana
Montana
43
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
69.4% Rank: 8
MT
U.S.
10%
8%
6%
32 30 33 36 36 42 43
Variable
Data
Rank
6.90%
32
6.75%
25
$18.02
44
$36.26
37
$0.00
$23.77
43
No
-$0.13
24
5.8%
562.0
38
52.2
45
$8.05
33
$2.21
40
No
50
34
4%
2%
0%
-2%
-4%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
48,162
Rank: 19
(in thousands)
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
11.7%
12
13
Rank: 7
MT
U.S.
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
www.alec.org
95
Nebraska
17
31
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
62.5% Rank: 10
NE
U.S.
8%
6%
34 29 34 32 31 37 35
Variable
Data
Rank
6.84%
31
7.81%
33
$18.52
46
$35.68
36
$22.80
25
$14.57
10
Yes
50
-$0.49
7.5%
19
639.9
46
74.1
$8.00
29
$1.78
21
Yes
34
4%
2%
0%
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
-24,274
Rank: 32
(in thousands)
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
7.5%
12
13
Rank: 15
NE
U.S.
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
Nevada
15
10
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
46.2% Rank: 23
NV
U.S.
15%
10%
5%
7 7 11 17 18 13 8
Variable
Data
Rank
0.00%
0.00%
$0.00
$27.20
20
$35.96
44
$35.54
49
No
$0.00
30
10.7%
43
367.6
57.0
37
$8.25
39
$1.26
Yes
0%
-5%
-10%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
231,579
Rank: 10
(in thousands)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
7.2
12
13
Rank: 16
NV
U.S.
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
-2%
-4%
-6%
-8%
-10%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
www.alec.org
97
New Hampshire
36
29
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
35.0% Rank: 44
NH
U.S.
8%
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
26 37 30 28 28 27 32
Variable
Data
Rank
0.00%
8.50%
38
$0.00
$53.07
49
$0.00
$19.54
29
No
$0.48
40
9.7%
38
520.6
23
65.7
21
$7.25
$2.18
39
No
50
34
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
-19
(in thousands)
Rank: 26
5
4
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
3.6%
12
13
Rank: 32
NH
U.S.
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
-6%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
New Jersey
48
46
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
34.6% Rank: 45
NJ
U.S.
7%
6%
5%
4%
48 46 48 45 42 39 45
Variable
Data
Rank
9.97%
46
9.00%
42
$24.81
48
$54.07
50
$16.92
11
$14.22
Yes
50
-$0.39
13
6.6%
15
531.2
26
60.1
32
$8.38
41
$2.82
48
No
50
14
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
-524,205
Rank: 46
(in thousands)
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
-60
-70
-80
-90
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
-1.1%
12
13
Rank: 47
NJ
U.S.
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
www.alec.org
99
New Mexico
26
34
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
44.7% Rank: 26
NM
U.S.
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
27 25 35 39 35 33 37
Variable
Data
Rank
4.90%
17
6.90%
26
$10.46
31
$19.36
$39.78
48
$13.59
No
$0.05
32
7.6%
23
595.5
42
52.7
44
$7.50
22
$1.99
31
No
50
34
0%
-2%
-4%
-6%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
19,783
Rank: 25
(in thousands)
10
0
-5
-10
-15
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
3.9%
12
13
Rank: 30
NM
U.S.
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0 least/worst 3=most/best)
New York
34
50
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
45.2% Rank: 25
NY
U.S.
8%
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
49 50 50 50 50 49 50
Variable
Data
Rank
12.70%
49
17.16%
50
$12.66
34
$46.19
46
$24.21
31
$20.59
35
Yes
50
-$1.48
9.4%
37
596.4
43
66.4
18
$8.75
43
$2.75
47
No
50
34
0%
-1%
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Rank: 50
(in thousands)
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
6.6%
12
13
Rank: 20
NY
U.S.
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
www.alec.org
101
North Carolina
10
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
50.5% Rank: 19
NC
U.S.
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
21 21 21 26 23 22 6
Variable
Data
Rank
5.75%
24
5.00%
$5.75
20
$24.49
12
$21.54
22
$16.89
19
No
-$0.43
11
7.5%
21
558.0
37
65.8
20
$7.25
$1.85
24
Yes
14
-2%
-4%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
655,663
Rank: 3
(in thousands)
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
8.3%
12
13
Rank: 14
NC
U.S.
6%
4%
2%
0%
Right-to-Work State?
-2%
-4%
-6%
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
North Dakota
North Dakota
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
149.4% Rank: 1
ND
U.S.
25%
18 13 12 7 5 2 4
Variable
Data
Rank
15%
3.22%
10
10%
4.53%
$9.12
29
$22.01
10
$35.62
43
$19.68
31
No
-$3.78
2.7%
625.1
44
69.8
$7.25
$0.88
Yes
34
20%
5%
0%
-5%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
32,185
Rank: 21
(in thousands)
20
15
10
5
0
-5
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
35.0%
12
13
Rank: 1
ND
U.S.
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
-2%
-4%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
www.alec.org
103
Ohio
49
23
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
32.6% Rank: 47
OH
U.S.
8%
47 45 42 38 37 26 23
Variable
Data
Rank
4%
7.83%
39
2%
3.58%
$12.73
35
$29.76
26
$18.66
15
$20.58
34
No
-$2.53
6.2%
12
501.6
16
62.1
30
$8.10
36
$1.74
18
No
50
14
6%
0%
-2%
-4%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
-397,184
Rank: 45
(in thousands)
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
-35
-40
-45
-50
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
-2.3%
12
13
Rank: 48
OH
U.S.
2%
1.%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
-6%
-7%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
Oklahoma
16
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
71.0% Rank: 7
OK
U.S.
15%
10%
5%
0%
14 15 14 14 14 19 21
Variable
Data
Rank
5.25%
22
6.00%
15
$7.91
28
$14.99
$28.14
37
$17.08
21
No
-$0.38
14
6.4%
14
541.3
31
55.0
42
$7.25
$2.55
45
Yes
-5%
-10%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
97,612
Rank: 14
(in thousands)
20
15,
10
5
0
-5
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
11.7%
12
13
Rank: 6
OK
U.S.
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
www.alec.org
105
Oregon
45
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
71.4% Rank: 6
OR
U.S.
12%
35 39 41 43 45 44 42
Variable
Data
Rank
10.62%
47
11.25%
48
$15.54
42
$33.69
33
$0.00
$22.87
42
Yes
50
$0.88
43
8.9%
33
482.8
10
62.6
28
$9.25
49
$1.37
No
50
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
174,782
Rank: 11
(in thousands)
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
7.1%
12
13
Rank: 17
OR
U.S.
6%
4%
2%
0%
-2%
Right-to-Work State?
-4%
-6%
-8%
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Pennsylvania
39
41
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
40.3% Rank: 33
PA
U.S.
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
36 42 43 41 40 34 33
Variable
Data
Rank
6.99%
34
17.03%
49
$0.00
$29.98
29
$17.25
12
$24.04
44
Yes
50
$1.82
47
8.6%
32
444.9
56.3
39
$7.25
$2.00
34
No
50
34
0%
-1%
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
-55,565
Rank: 36
(in thousands)
10
5
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
-35
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
2.5%
Rank: 37
PA
U.S.
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
www.alec.org
107
Rhode Island
47
39
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
31.6% Rank: 48
RI
U.S.
8%
45 48 45 42 43 45 41
Variable
Data
Rank
5.99%
26
2%
7.00%
27
0%
$6.98
24
$49.27
47
$17.68
13
$17.56
24
Yes
50
-$0.14
23
6%
4%
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
-69,187
Rank: 40
(in thousands)
-2
-4
-6
-8
12.2%
48
458.1
60.9
31
$9.00
44
$1.99
31
No
50
14
-10
-12
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
-2.8%
12
13
Rank: 49
RI
U.S.
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
-6%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
South Carolina
20
32
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
39.2% Rank: 36
SC
U.S.
7%
6%
20 20 31 22 27 31 31
Variable
Data
Rank
7.00%
36
5.00%
$16.14
43
$29.96
28
$20.25
19
$16.77
18
No
$0.21
36
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
334,453
Rank: 6
(in thousands)
60
50
40
30
20
12.8%
49
539.4
30
56.3
39
$7.25
$2.00
34
Yes
14
10
0
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
6.2%
12
13
Rank: 21
SC
U.S.
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
-6.%
-7%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
www.alec.org
109
South Dakota
14
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
63.0% Rank: 9
SD
U.S.
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
2 5 4 2 2 3 2
Variable
Data
Rank
0.00%
0.00%
$0.00
$26.81
18
$30.46
39
$17.76
25
No
$0.00
31
0%
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
23,748
Rank: 23
(in thousands)
7.7%
25
548.3
34
69.5
10
$8.50
42
$1.86
26
Yes
14
-1
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
10.0%
Rank: 11
SD
U.S.
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
Tennessee
24
17
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
39.2% Rank: 35
TN
U.S.
7%
6%
5%
4%
3 9 10 8 12 18 19
Variable
Data
Rank
0.00%
6.50%
22
$0.00
$21.00
$34.85
42
$20.08
32
Yes
50
$0.12
33
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
285,394
Rank: 7
(in thousands)
60
50
40
30
20
7.6%
22
504.7
18
63.7
26
$7.25
$1.95
29
Yes
14
10
0
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
3.8%
Rank: 31
TN
U.S.
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
-6%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
www.alec.org
111
Texas
11
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
81.7% Rank: 4
TX
U.S.
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
-2%
13 10 19 18 16 12 13
Variable
Data
Rank
0.00%
2.55%
$0.00
$37.04
38
$23.87
28
$21.34
38
No
-$0.39
12
11.7%
45
537.9
29
57.2
35
$7.25
$1.61
15
Yes
14
-4%
-6%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
1,229,173
Rank: 1
(in thousands)
250
200
150
100
50
0
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
20.5%
12
13
Rank: 2
TX
U.S.
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
Utah
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
76.1% Rank: 5
UT
U.S.
14%
12%
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Variable
Data
Rank
5.00%
18
5.00%
$0.00
$26.98
19
$25.17
33
$15.59
14
No
$0.17
34
7.8%
27
488.8
13
69.7
$7.25
$1.31
Yes
14
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
78,474
Rank: 16
(in thousands)
25
20
15
10
5
0
-5
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
20.4%
12
13
Rank: 3
UT
U.S.
6%
4%
2%
0%
Right-to-Work State?
-2%
-4%
-6%
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
www.alec.org
113
Vermont
38
49
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
38.8% Rank: 37
VT
U.S.
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
50 49 49 49 49 50 49
Variable
Data
Rank
8.95%
43
8.50%
38
$28.69
49
$50.32
48
$12.83
$28.85
48
Yes
50
$2.60
50
5.3%
632.2
45
67.1
16
$9.15
47
$2.33
43
No
50
34
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
-7,780
(in thousands)
Rank: 29
0.5
-0.5
-1
-1.5
-2
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
2.0%
12
13
Rank: 40
VT
U.S.
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
Virginia
16
12
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
47.3% Rank: 22
VA
U.S.
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
5 4 8 3 3 5 11
Variable
Data
Rank
5.75%
24
7.49%
31
$6.45
22
$29.09
22
$11.69
$15.84
15
No
$1.02
44
7.9%
28
532.2
27
70.2
$7.25
$1.17
Yes
34
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
120,136
Rank: 12
(in thousands)
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
-5
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
6.9%
12
13
Rank: 18
VA
U.S.
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
www.alec.org
115
Washington
35
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
57.3% Rank: 13
WA
U.S.
10%
8%
6%
4%
30 22 24 33 33 36 38
Variable
Data
Rank
0.00%
6.23%
20
$0.00
$29.41
24
$31.73
41
$22.58
40
Yes
50
$0.36
39
11.7%
46
460.2
65.4
22
$9.47
50
$2.00
34
No
50
14
2%
0%
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
275,864
Rank: 8
(in thousands)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
11.0%
12
13
Rank: 10
WA
U.S.
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
-6%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
West Virginia
19
36
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
59.1% Rank: 12
WV
U.S.
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
38 33 27 31 30 32 30
Variable
Data
Rank
6.50%
28
6.50%
22
$15.53
41
$22.31
11
$19.85
18
$27.58
47
No
$0.26
38
5.4%
564.2
39
44.8
50
$8.00
29
$1.37
No
50
34
0%
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
23,390
Rank: 24
(in thousands)
4
3
1
0
-1
-2
-3
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
5.0%
12
13
Rank: 26
WV
U.S.
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
www.alec.org
117
Wisconsin
43
13
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
37.7% Rank: 39
WI
U.S.
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
33 27 23 30 32 15 17
Variable
Data
Rank
7.65%
38
7.90%
34
$4.51
17
$42.29
41
$19.46
16
$17.33
22
No
-$1.84
7.1%
16
477.8
68.4
15
$7.25
$1.92
28
No
50
0%
-1%
-2%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
-56,632
Rank: 37
(in thousands)
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
2.3%
Rank: 39
WI
U.S.
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-5%
Right-to-Work State?
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
Wyoming
Economic
Performance Rank
Economic
Outlook Rank
A backward-looking measure based on the states performance (equal-weighted average) in the three important performance variables shown below. These variables are highly influenced by state policy.
113.5% Rank: 2
WY
U.S.
20%
15%
10%
4 6 6 6 6 6 10
Variable
Data
Rank
0.00%
0.00%
$0.00
$45.43
44
$41.38
49
$12.20
No
$2.34
48
2.5%
865.5
50
72.6
$7.25
$1.76
20
Yes
34
5%
0%
-5%
-10%
-15%
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
31,416
Rank: 22
(in thousands)
7
6
5
3
2
1
0
-1
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
15.8%
12
13
Rank: 4
WY
U.S.
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
Right-to-Work State?
-2%
-4%
-6%
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
(0=least/worst 3=most/best)
www.alec.org
119
APPENDIX
Appendix
n previous editions of this report we introduced 15 policy variables that have a proven impact on
the migration of capitalboth investment and humaninto and out of states. The end result of
an equal-weighted combination of these variables is the 2015 ALEC-Laffer Economic Outlook rankings of the states. Each of these factors is influenced directly by state lawmakers through the legislative
process. The 15 factors and a basic description of their purposes, sourcing, and subsequent calculation
methodologies are as follows:
HIGHEST MARGINAL PERSONAL INCOME
TAX RATE
This ranking includes local taxes, if any, and any
impact of federal deductibility, if allowed. A states
largest city was used as a proxy for local tax rates.
Data were drawn from: Tax Analysts, Federation
of Tax Administrators, and individual state tax return forms. Tax rates are as of January 1, 2015.
HIGHEST MARGINAL CORPORATE INCOME
TAX RATE
This variable includes local taxes, if any, and includes the effect of federal deductibility, if allowed. A states largest city was used as a proxy
for local tax rates. In the case of gross receipts
or business franchise taxes, an effective tax rate
was approximated using NIPA profits, rental and
proprietors income, and gross domestic product
data. The Texas franchise tax is not a traditional
gross receipts tax, but is instead a margin tax
with more than one rate. A margin tax creates
less distortion than does a gross receipts tax.
Therefore, what we believe is the best measurement for an effective corporate tax rate for Texas
is to average the 4.15 percent measure we would
use if the tax was a gross receipts tax and the 0.95
percent highest rate on its margin tax, leading to
our measure of 2.55 percent. Data were drawn
from: Tax Analysts, Federation of Tax Administrators, individual state tax return forms, and the
Bureau of Economic Analysis. Tax rates are as of
January 1, 2015.
PERSONAL INCOME TAX PROGRESSIVITY
This variable was measured as the difference
between the average tax liability per $1,000 at
incomes of $50,000 and $150,000. The tax liabili-
ties were measured using a combination of effective tax rates, exemptions, and deductions at both
state and federal levels, which are calculations
from Laffer Associates.
PROPERTY TAX BURDEN
This variable was calculated by taking tax revenues from property taxes per $1,000 of personal
income. We have used U.S. Census Bureau data,
for which the most recent year available is 2012.
These data were released in December 2014.
SALES TAX BURDEN
This variable was calculated by taking tax revenues from sales taxes per $1,000 of personal income. Sales taxes taken into consideration include
the general sales tax and specific sales taxes. We
have used U.S. Census Bureau Data, for which the
most recent year available is 2012. Where appropriate, gross receipts or business franchise taxes,
counted as sales taxes in the Census data, were
subtracted from a states total sales taxes in order
to avoid double-counting tax burden in a state.
These data were released in December 2014.
REMAINING TAX BURDEN
This variable was calculated by taking tax revenues from all taxesexcluding personal income,
corporate income (including corporate license),
property, sales, and severance per $1,000 of personal income. We used U.S. Census Bureau Data,
for which the most recent year available is 2012.
These data were released in December 2014.
ESTATE OR INHERITANCE TAX (YES OR NO)
This variable assesses if a state levies an estate
or an inheritance tax. We chose to score states
www.alec.org
121