Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Good Fair Poor Quality of Statement:: Directly Relate To Directly To Critical Directly To The

    Uploaded by

    api-281661832
    47 views1 page
    The document provides criteria for evaluating student work on a tennis skills assignment in three categories: quality of statement, statement's reliability to critical features, and accuracy of statements. A good evaluation would reflect thorough research, stimulate critical thinking, relate statements to back/forehand skills, and provide accurate biomechanical information. A fair evaluation would show moderate research that may stimulate thinking and include mostly accurate information. A poor evaluation would reflect little research, obvious statements that don't stimulate thinking, lack of relation to skills, and inaccurate or untrue information.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    tennisrubicgraphicorganizer

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document provides criteria for evaluating student work on a tennis skills assignment in three categories: quality of statement, statement's reliability to critical features, and accuracy of statements. A good evaluation would reflect thorough research, stimulate critical thinking, relate statements to back/forehand skills, and provide accurate biomechanical information. A fair evaluation would show moderate research that may stimulate thinking and include mostly accurate information. A poor evaluation would reflect little research, obvious statements that don't stimulate thinking, lack of relation to skills, and inaccurate or untrue information.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    47 views1 page

    Good Fair Poor Quality of Statement:: Directly Relate To Directly To Critical Directly To The

    Uploaded by

    api-281661832
    The document provides criteria for evaluating student work on a tennis skills assignment in three categories: quality of statement, statement's reliability to critical features, and accuracy of statements. A good evaluation would reflect thorough research, stimulate critical thinking, relate statements to back/forehand skills, and provide accurate biomechanical information. A fair evaluation would show moderate research that may stimulate thinking and include mostly accurate information. A poor evaluation would reflect little research, obvious statements that don't stimulate thinking, lack of relation to skills, and inaccurate or untrue information.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Good

    Fair

    Poor

    Statement reflects
    that student
    thoroughly scoured
    the material and
    spent time
    developing a quality
    statement that will
    surely stimulate
    partners critical
    thinking ability.
    4 out of the 6
    statements
    directly relate to
    critical features of
    either back or
    forehand.

    Statement shows
    that student
    moderately
    examined material.
    Student developed
    a statement that
    may stimulate
    partners critical
    thinking ability.

    Student spent little


    or no time
    examining material.
    Statement is
    obvious and does
    not stimulate critical
    thinking.

    At least 3 out of the


    6 statements relate
    directly to critical
    features of the back
    or forehand.

    1 or no statements
    out of the six relate
    directly to the
    critical features of
    the back or
    forehand.

    Accuracy of
    Statements:

    Statement provides
    accurate
    biomechanically
    sound information
    that was taken from
    the provided
    websites and
    videos.

    Statements are
    inaccurate or
    untrue. None or
    very little info was
    taken from the
    websites or videos
    provided.

    After reading
    reaction
    responses:

    5 or more reactions
    from the after
    reading column are
    correct.

    Statements provide
    mostly accurate
    biomechanical
    information. Most of
    the info for the
    statement was
    taken from the
    website and videos
    provided.
    At least 3 of the
    reactions in the
    after reading
    column are correct.

    Quality of
    statement:

    Statements
    reliability to
    critical features:

    1 or less of the
    reactions in the
    after reading
    column are correct.

    You might also like