This document outlines the structure for the body of a humanities paper. It recommends including 3 analyses, each with an identified subject, argument about that subject, and conclusions discovered. Between each analysis, the document suggests summarizing how the subjects and discoveries relate. It provides an example paper structure following this format with 4 sections analyzing different historical books and accounts, summarizing after each. The document concludes by listing best practices for developing the analysis in the body, such as using relevant examples and citations to make an original argument.
This document outlines the structure for the body of a humanities paper. It recommends including 3 analyses, each with an identified subject, argument about that subject, and conclusions discovered. Between each analysis, the document suggests summarizing how the subjects and discoveries relate. It provides an example paper structure following this format with 4 sections analyzing different historical books and accounts, summarizing after each. The document concludes by listing best practices for developing the analysis in the body, such as using relevant examples and citations to make an original argument.
This document outlines the structure for the body of a humanities paper. It recommends including 3 analyses, each with an identified subject, argument about that subject, and conclusions discovered. Between each analysis, the document suggests summarizing how the subjects and discoveries relate. It provides an example paper structure following this format with 4 sections analyzing different historical books and accounts, summarizing after each. The document concludes by listing best practices for developing the analysis in the body, such as using relevant examples and citations to make an original argument.
This document outlines the structure for the body of a humanities paper. It recommends including 3 analyses, each with an identified subject, argument about that subject, and conclusions discovered. Between each analysis, the document suggests summarizing how the subjects and discoveries relate. It provides an example paper structure following this format with 4 sections analyzing different historical books and accounts, summarizing after each. The document concludes by listing best practices for developing the analysis in the body, such as using relevant examples and citations to make an original argument.
A. Background (e.g., description, history, etc) Section 2. B. Analysis 1 Section 3. 1. Subject of analysis 1 (Section 3.1.) 2. Subject subjected to argument (Section 3.2.) 3. What was discovered, found, concluded C. Analysis 2 Section 4. 1. Subject of analysis 2 (Section 4.1.) 2. Subject subjected to argument (Section 4.2.) 3. What was discovered, found, concluded D. Analysis 3 Section 5. 1. Subject of analysis 3 (Section 5.1.) 2. Subject subjected to argument (Section 5.2.) 3. What was discovered, found, concluded E. Summarize: (how all subjects/discoveries/argument relate) (Section 6.)
This structure reflects 3 steps that are
obligatory:
identify and list the example;
analyze the example; interpret the example.
Indians: Textuality, Morality, and the
problem of History. An Example
II. Body A. Modern history books 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Perry Millers books analyzed
Francis Jenningss books analyzed Charles Hudsons books analyzed Summary of the analysis so far Problems restated in relation to what has been found
Indians: Textuality, Morality, and the
problem of History. An Example B. Captivity narratives and their analysis 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
James Axtells book analyzed
Norman Heards analyzed Summary of the analysis so far Mary Rowlandsons books analyzed Summary of the analysis so far Problems restated in relation to what has been found
Indians: Textuality, Morality, and the
problem of History. An Example C. 17th-century histories 1. 2. 3. 4.
William woods book analyzed
Alexander Whitakers book analyzed Summary of the analysis so far Problems restated in relation to what has been found
Indians: Textuality, Morality, and the
problem of History. An Example D. Results/Summary
What to do with these conflicting
accounts? Summary of the analysis
When writing the body, always check:
Aim at a smart audience.
Give relevant examples. Stay on track. Be meticulous about documentation. Avoid extensive quotations. Cite recent literature. Cite multiple sources. Avoid monotonous synopses of others work. Provide evidence. Claim your ideas. Stick to your point. Do not use a discovery structure. Do not use the mystery novel structure. Develop the examples evenly.