Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3G Huawei RAN Resource Monitoring and Management
3G Huawei RAN Resource Monitoring and Management
Resource
Expansible
NodeB Level
Yes
Yes
Yes
Cell Level
-OVSF code
-UL power
-DL power
No
Yes
Yes
RRU
1
-CE card
-CE license
-HS-PDSCH code license
RRU
2
RRU
3
BBU
RNC
Service distribution
Each service type will occupy different resources. Hence we
should divide the traffic volume corresponding to each service
type to understand the characteristic of the cell.
AMR
VP
PS R99 DL
PS R99 UL
HSDPA
HSUPA
CE Resource Description
CE resource is consisting of hardware and software. CE is
the pool resource at NodeB level, all cells connected to NodeB
will share the same CE resource.
Hardware
Number of CEs will be vary upon the model of card.
Truemove typically uses CE Card model WWBP2 (UL/DL128
CEs).
The monitor will be done at NodeB level.
Software
1 License will be equal to 16 CEs.
Number of UL/DL license can be assigned independently.
The monitor can be done separately for UL and DL.
HSDPA will use the remaining power left from R99 service.
-CS user
-PS R99 User
-HSDPA User
-HSUPA User
Service
distribution
-Power
-OVSF code
-CE
-Iub
Resources
-Desire QoS
-Congestion
User
experience
different. Algorithm
1 or Algorithm 2 ?
CPICH Power
MaxPCPICHPower (~ 10% of total cell power)
Default = 33 or 36 dBm
Total Power
MaxTxPower
Default = 43 or 46 dBm according to license
MaxTxPower44
MaxTxPower = 43 dBm
MaxPCPICHPower = 33 dBm
42
40
dBm
38
PCPICH + Common
channel
36
PCPICH
34
32
30
Average of VS.MaxTCP
Average of VS.MeanTCP
44
MaxTxPower
42
40
VS.MaxTCP (R99+HSDPA)
VS.MeanTCP (R99+HSDPA)
VS.MaxTCP.NonHS (R99)
VS.MeanTCP.NonHS (R99)
38
dBm
PCPICH + Common
channel
36
PCPICH
Example : BKD0040U3
34
32
30
Average of VS.MaxTCP.NonHS
Average of VS.MeanTCP.NonHS
UL ENU
VS.RAC.DL.TotalTrfFactor
DL ENU
Sevice
ENU
DCH uplink
DCH downlink
HSDPA
HSUPA
0.44
0.42
0.28
1.76
1.11
1.11
0.74
1.89
1.44
1.42
1.35
1.04
0.78
2.26
1.62
1.25
1.11
2.37
2.15
2.19
1.70
2.60
3.45
3.25
2.79
3.14
5.78
5.93
4.92
4.67
6.41
6.61
5.46
4.87
10.18
10.49
9.36
6.61
14.27
15.52
14.17
9.36
30
25
20
15
10
Average of VS.RAC.DL.TotalTrfFactor
Average of VS.RAC.UL.TotalTrfFactor
8
PS 384
16
PS128
32
PS 64
64
128
AMR
0
0
1
0
2
1
3
0
4
2
5
1
6
3
7
8
4
9
2
10
5
11
1
12
6
13
3
14
7
15
256
Channel type
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
CPICH
PCCPCH
AICH
PICH
SCCPCH1
SCCPCH1
SCCPCH1
SCCPCH1
HS-SCCH
HS-SCCH
HS-SCCH
HS-SCCH
HS-SCCH
HS-SCCH
HS-SCCH
HS-SCCH
E-AGCH
E-HICH/E-RGCH
E-HICH/E-RGCH
SF
CE Consumption
3.4
256
13.6
128
8
16
128
128
32
64
64
32
128
16
144
16
256
384
Note : Even HS-PDSCH will not utilize DL CE but A HSDPA User will
consume 1*SF256 (1 CE) in DL for A-DCH.
SF
CE Consumption
3.4
256
13.6
64
8
16
64
64
32
32
1.5
64
16
128
144
256
10
384
10
SF
CE Consumption
256
16
64
32
64
1.5
64
64
1.5
128
32
144
256
384
10
608
10
1450
2SF2
32
2048
2SF2
32
2890
2SF2+2SF4
48
5760
2SF2+2SF4
48
Example : BKD0040U3
300
250
200
100
50
Average of VS.RAB.SFOccupy
Average of VS.RAB.SFOccupy.MAX
Total 160 + 19 common channel = 179 codes are occupied and forbidden for traffic
channel.
Free code left for traffic channel = 256-179 = 77 Codes
However, 1 SF32 is reserved for handover during CAC process . The actual free left
code should be about 77- 8 = 69 Codes or about 34 AMR Voice.
1.2
160
140
120
100
0.8
80
60
40
0.6
20
0
0.4
Sum of VS.LC.ULCreditAvailable.Shared
0.2
Sum of VS.LC.ULMax.LicenseGroup.Shared
Sum of VS.LC.ULMean.LicenseGroup.Shared
Sum of VS.RRC.Rej.DLIUBBandCong
Sum of VS.RRC.Rej.DL.CE.Cong
Sum of VS.RRC.Rej.Power.Cong
Sum of VS.RRC.Rej.ULIUBBandCong
Sum of VS.RRC.Rej.UL.CE.Cong
Sum of VS.RRC.Rej.Code.Cong
Note : When RRC Setup failure, RAB setup will not initiate.
Therefore RAB Setup congestion can not be seen.
TCP
44
42
40
10
38
dBm
36
Congestion but
just quite small
8
7
6
34
32
30
5
4
Average of VS.MaxTCP.NonHS
Average of VS.MeanTCP.NonHS
3
2
35
30
25
UL ENU
20
15
Sum of VS.RAB.FailEstab.CS.DLIUBBand.Cong
Sum of VS.RAB.FailEstab.CS.ULIUBBand.Cong
Sum of VS.RAB.FailEstCs.Code.Cong
Sum of VS.RAB.FailEstCs.DLCE.Cong
Sum of VS.RAB.FailEstCs.Power.Cong
Sum of VS.RAB.FailEstCs.ULCE.Cong
10
Average of VS.RAC.DL.TotalTrfFactor
Average of VS.RAC.UL.TotalTrfFactor
LOW ~ 25 ENUs
Sum of VS.LC.DLCreditAvailable.Shared
Sum of VS.LC.DLMax.LicenseGroup.Shared
Sum of VS.LC.DLMean.LicenseGroup.Shared
UL CE Usage
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Sum of VS.LC.ULCreditAvailable.Shared
Sum of VS.LC.ULMean.LicenseGroup.Shared
Sum of VS.LC.ULMax.LicenseGroup.Shared
VS.HSUPA.UE.Mean.Cell
VS.CellPCHUEs
VS.CellDCHUEs
VS.CellFACHUEs
RRC
reject
All RAB service
reject
Handover reject
MaxTxPower = 43 or 46 dBm
RRC
reject
All RAB service
reject
Handover reject
For handover of a user, the admission accepted when [load of the path] +
[bandwidth required by user] < [Total configured bandwidth of the path]
For a new user, the admission accepted when [load of the path] +
[bandwidth required by user] < [Total configured bandwidth of the path]
[bandwidth reserved for handover]
For rate upsizing of a user, the admission accepted when [load of the path] +
[bandwidth required by user] < [Total configured bandwidth of the path]
[congestion threshold]
WBBP upgrade/downgrade
2.
UL/DL CE upgrade/downgrade
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
CE
Power
Code
Iub
Resource unit
WBBP : 128 UL/DL
CE License : 16 CE in UL or DL separately
CE resource configuration
To configure and use CE resource at NodeB, it will be defined as BB Resource
Group separately for UL and DL
The main concern about the BB Resource Group is
If configure multi WBBP card into one UL BB Resource Group, CE is sum of
CE from every WBBP cards.
If configure multi WBBP card into one DL BB Resource Group, CE is
CE of only one WBBP card.
One DL BB
Resource
and UL BB
Resource
Group
128 UL/DL
128 UL/DL
UL CE = 256
DL CE = 128
DL BB Resource
Group 0
UL BB Resource
Group 0
128 UL/DL
128 UL/DL
UL CE = 256
Sector2
DL CE = 128
Sector3
DL BB Resource
Group 0
DL BB Resource
Group 1
UL BB Resource
Group 0
Sector1
128 UL/DL
128 UL/DL
DL CE = 128
UL CE = 256
Sector2
Sector3
DL CE = 128
WBBP card
* Slot 01 is not
configured yet.
Or using MML command LST BRD
+++
BKA9042U
O&M
#190945
%%LST BRD: SRN=0;%%
RETCODE = 0 Succeed.
2010-09-15 09:45:13
END
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
16
18
19
Configuration Status
Board Type
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
Unknown
Unknown
WBBP
WBBP
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
WMPT
UBF
Unknown
UPEA
LST ULGROUP
2010-09-15 09:58:33
=
=
=
=
0
Master
0
3
=
=
=
=
1
Master
0
2
(Number of results = 2)
---
+++
BKA9042U
O&M
#191359
%%LST ULGROUP:;%%
RETCODE = 0 Succeed.
2010-09-15 10:00:30
---
END
END
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
0
Master
0
2
Master
0
3
300
300
300
Sector No.
Two Tx Way
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
29000
29000
29000
0
0
0
No
No
No
END
2010-09-15 10:34:20
NodeB License
-------------
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Operator Index
Operator Name
Downlink Frequencies
License Status
Max Uplink CE
Max Downlink CE
Max Local Cell
HSDPA Function
Max HSDPA User
HSDPA RRM Package1
Max HS-PDSCH Code Number
MBMS Function
HSUPA Function
PA Sharing Function
HSUPA TTI Function
CCPIC Function
DYNAMIC CE
DYNAMIC Voltage
64QAM NUM
MIMO NUM
Cell Number in 400(0.1dBm)
Cell Number in 418(0.1dBm)
Cell Number in 430(0.1dBm)
Cell Number in 448(0.1dBm)
Cell Number in 460(0.1dBm)
Cell Number in 478(0.1dBm)
Cell Number in 490(0.1dBm)
Multi-Mode BTS TS
Ethernet Syn
IP Clock Function
Multi-Mode BTS
END
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
0xffff
Shared
Unlimited frequency
Legal license
256
256
4
Yes
100
Yes
45
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
4
0
0
0
4
0
4
4
0
No
No
Yes
No
Unset
CE License would be
pool resource for all
the BB Resource
Groups
Only limit power resource on UL is ENU, UL ENU can adjust ranging from 1 200
The concern of increasing UL ENU is RTWP. Although, call admission is success but it may
lead to voice quality and drop call problem to itself or other UEs.
The performance after increasing UL ENU should be closely monitored.
Note : please try to keep the ratio of CPICH power vs Max Transmit
Power of Cell at 10% this would help to easily maintain CPICH Ec/No of
the HSDPA carrier.
At the moment, code congestion would be caused by insufficient code for AMR and
PS R99. However, PS DL R99 should be very low as most of DL PS RB is HSDPA. Thus,
most of the service congestion due to code should be AMR.
To overcome this problem, the reduction of fix HS-PDSCH code would be the best
solution at the moment. The trade-off between AMR and HS-PDSCH code allocation is
unavoidable according to limit of DL OVSF Code.
1 HS-PDSCH
(SF16)
AMR
(SF128)
AMR
(SF128)
AMR
(SF128)
AMR
(SF128)
AMR
(SF128)
AMR
(SF128)
AMR
(SF128)
AMR
(SF128)
7
8
Almost all of Iub is IP over MPLS, the bandwidth limit should be omitted.