The document argues that natural numbers should start with 2 instead of 1, as counting only begins when there is more than one item. It claims that anything larger than 1 can be represented by n, and that 3 actually represents infinity since it is written as two 3s stacked on top of each other. The author hopes this explanation will resolve debates about whether 0 is a natural number, but acknowledges their view is unlikely to be accepted.
The document argues that natural numbers should start with 2 instead of 1, as counting only begins when there is more than one item. It claims that anything larger than 1 can be represented by n, and that 3 actually represents infinity since it is written as two 3s stacked on top of each other. The author hopes this explanation will resolve debates about whether 0 is a natural number, but acknowledges their view is unlikely to be accepted.
The document argues that natural numbers should start with 2 instead of 1, as counting only begins when there is more than one item. It claims that anything larger than 1 can be represented by n, and that 3 actually represents infinity since it is written as two 3s stacked on top of each other. The author hopes this explanation will resolve debates about whether 0 is a natural number, but acknowledges their view is unlikely to be accepted.
Subject: Natural numbers start with 2. Newsgroups: sci.math Date: 1993-04-14 06:44:33 PST The natural numbers start with 2 (TWO). The name "counting numbers" make that clear. If there's only one item of a certain kind, one doesn't start counting. Moreover, for most mathematicians, counting stops at two as well, as anything larger than 1 is denoted by `n', which is synonymous with `many, I don't care how many'. Consequently, 3 must be supposed to be infinity. The symbol for infinity is two 3's on top of each other. This explains the mystery of Trinity. I hope this simple solution will stop the silly discussions about 0 being a natural number. My hope will be in vain, I know. JWN