Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Peer Review From Michael
Peer Review From Michael
Genre Analysis
(20 points)
Micro-Ethnography
(20 points)
Midterm Reflection
(5 points)
Final Reflection
(15 points)
Overall
Daily
Constructi
Assignmen
on
ts
(10 points)
(5 points)
Portfolio
(5 points)
Scoring Criteria
Genre Proposal
2 peer workshops
Draft 2
Olivia's comments (either comments or summary)
Revision Workshop
Final Draft (see rubric)
Field Notes & Interview Questions
Swales Chart
Outline
2 peer workshops
Draft 2
Olivia's comments (either comments or summary)
Final Draft (see rubric)
PowerPoint Presentation
Final Draft (see rubric)
2 peer workshops
Final Draft (see rubric)
Letter to Olivia
5 Daybook Entries
2 In-Class Assignments
5 Discussion Forum Posts
5 Discussion Forum Replies
2 peer workshops
A short introduction is included for each page,
which includes a detailed description of the items
Total
Point
s
1
2
1
1
1
14
1
1
1
2
1
1
11
2
5
1.5
13.5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Scor
e
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
5
1.5
1
1
1
1
Score
presented.
The portfolio meets the needs of the intended
audience.
The portfolio contains a strong personal
introduction that frames the rest of the portfolio.
The writer demonstrates a firm grasp of the
conventions of written English (spelling,
capitalization, punctuation etc.). There are no
typos.
Total Points
1
1
1
70
Reviewer Memo
1. My intended audience for this portfolio is:
My decision was based on seeing everything laid out in steps and getting
progressively better. Also making sure the two major projects are front and center so
to be seen first.
4. The design element like best right now is:
Great introduction to the portfolio. I like how you incorporated both the intro and the letter to
Olivia right off the bat. You may want to change the Fall 2015 since this is actually Spring 2015.
Your letter to Olivia is candid and does not hide just how you felt about the course or what was
expected of you in this course. The honesty and transparency are rare qualities in a writer to be
displayed as you have. I would suggest leaving the introduction just as it is. I think that it
captures the readers attention and helps draw them into the remainder of the portfolio.
GA was put together well. The half complete peer workshop definitely could have been an issue
that you could have used to slow you down, but you did not. Very commendable for that effort
and determination on your part. Make sure that you include a final version of the GA in your
final portfolio for submission. That is a majority of the grade for this section.
Class Activity
There is not really anything that I can say about this section. You have the five daybook entries
included. I am curious why did you choose these particular daybook entries to include in your
portfolio over some of the others? It might help if you could explain briefly why you selected
the activity that you did.
Micro-ethnography
I did not see the 2 peer reviews for this section. Again make sure that you include a final version
of the ME paper to be included in your portfolio. You have proven without question that you
have not waited until the last minute to complete this and that you understand the importance of
getting the required information displayed without there being any issues finding it. Everything
is clear and easy to locate throughout the portfolio.
Reflections and Forums
Again make sure that you include the final version of the Final Reflection. You have everything
else that is expected. Great layout and thought process in how you designed the portfolio. Your
forum posts and replies are very good. I did not see the 2 in-class assignments, I may have
missed them.