In your introduction, you outlined the parameters of your paper
very well and described your topic clearly. In terms of what should be included in the introduction, you did not leave out much at all. I think that you could include more about who exactly participates in this conversation like the discourse community maybe- and also possibly some information regarding the time frame of your articles and how that affects the audiences perception of the conversation. Your definition of hedge funds and what they serve the purpose of is very direct and easy to understand for people reading the paper. Im not sure if this is important, but I would look into whether or not you need to include periods when abbreviating United States. You have some weird things going on with the spacing where your hanging indents begin. The spacing seems off. In your annotations, I like the organization/setup that you chose to keep constant throughout all of them. However, I felt that some of the annotations lacked detail about the actual content and that you could include more about the specific ideas brought up by the author of that article. Once you start specifying what each article is about, it will be easier to explain how each annotation is relevant to the conversation of the discourse community.