Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Rubric 2

    Uploaded by

    api-284973023
    16 views1 page
    This document outlines a rubric for evaluating a student's understanding of plant parts, data collection, graph assembly, and group cooperation on a scale of 1 to 4. A score of 1 indicates an inability to label plant parts, lack of required data, an extremely disproportionate and lacking graph, and never helping the group. In contrast, a score of 4 represents knowing every plant part, collecting all required data, a properly proportioned and accurately representative graph, and doing everything possible to help the group. Scores of 2 and 3 denote intermediate levels of performance for each category.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    rubric2

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document outlines a rubric for evaluating a student's understanding of plant parts, data collection, graph assembly, and group cooperation on a scale of 1 to 4. A score of 1 indicates an inability to label plant parts, lack of required data, an extremely disproportionate and lacking graph, and never helping the group. In contrast, a score of 4 represents knowing every plant part, collecting all required data, a properly proportioned and accurately representative graph, and doing everything possible to help the group. Scores of 2 and 3 denote intermediate levels of performance for each category.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    16 views1 page

    Rubric 2

    Uploaded by

    api-284973023
    This document outlines a rubric for evaluating a student's understanding of plant parts, data collection, graph assembly, and group cooperation on a scale of 1 to 4. A score of 1 indicates an inability to label plant parts, lack of required data, an extremely disproportionate and lacking graph, and never helping the group. In contrast, a score of 4 represents knowing every plant part, collecting all required data, a properly proportioned and accurately representative graph, and doing everything possible to help the group. Scores of 2 and 3 denote intermediate levels of performance for each category.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Category

    Understandin
    g of Parts of
    the Plant

    The student
    knew every
    part of the
    plant.

    The student
    knew most of
    the parts of the
    plant.

    The students
    knew some of
    the parts but
    was still largely
    confused

    The student
    was unable to
    label any of the
    parts of the
    plant

    Data
    Collection

    All required
    data was
    collected to
    complete the
    assignment.

    The data was


    mostly
    accurate, but
    still missing
    information.

    The lack of data


    caused the
    student to
    misinterpret
    the graph

    The student did


    not have any of
    the required
    data

    Graph
    Assembly and
    Accuracy

    The graph was


    proportioned
    properly and
    represented all
    the data.

    The graph had


    most of the
    data, and was
    close to
    accurately
    resembling it.

    The graph had


    most of the
    data, but was
    still not a
    reflection of it.

    The graph was


    extremely
    disproportioned
    and lacking
    data.

    Students
    Cooperation
    in Group

    The student did


    everything they
    could to help
    the group.

    The student did


    work, but just
    enough to get
    by.

    The student did


    some work, but
    wasnt a big
    contribution.

    The student
    never helped
    his group.

    You might also like