Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1000個數學難題
1000個數學難題
Mathematics
10000
10000
10000
.
(CIP)
10000 /10000 . :
2009
ISBN 978-7-03-024267-9
. 1 . 1
. N49
. - -
O1-49
16
: 100717
http://www.sciencep.com
*
2009 5
2009 5
: 13 000
: B5(7201000)
: 35 3/4
: 695 000
: 118.00
(, )
10000
.
, . 1900 8
23 . 100 ,
23 , ,
.
, . 2000
, 7 , ,
. , 21
100 ,
100 , .
, ,
. , ,
. , ,
. ,
.
,
, . ,
,
10000 ,
. ,
.
,
.
,
10000 . ,
, .
10000 ,
, .
, , ,
ii
10000
,
. , ,
,
.
10000 ,
, ,
, , ,
.
2008 12
. , , ,
, . ,
, , ,
, . ,
,
.
. ,
.
(!) ,
,
1900 ,
23 20 ,
. 21 , ,
,
, ; (Clay)
100 , .
, , , ,
? ,
,
,
. ,
, 10000 ,
, .
, ,
, ,
.
, ,
, , ,
iv
10000
, ,
, .
, , .
, ,
, , .
, ,
,
,
, . ,
,
, ,
,
. , ,
, , ,
, , .
2008 10
10000
(Vaught) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
(Borel) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
r = r ? s = s ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Sacks) (Post)
(Martin) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Turing) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Turing) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cherlin-Zilber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shelah . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3-Calabi-Yau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Artin) Grobner-Shirshov . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. Bokut
(Broue) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Brown) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Cayley) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Foulkes) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Gorenstein) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Kaplansky) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Nakayama) (Nakayama) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Ramras) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Smashing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1)
(3)
(5)
(7)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(13)
(15)
(17)
(19)
(21)
(23)
(24)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(30)
(35)
(37)
(39)
(41)
(43)
(45)
(47)
(49)
(51)
vi
10000
(Bass-Quillen) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Brauer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fitting. . . . . .
smash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pieri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GrobnerShirshov . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. Bokut
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ABC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Bass) (Soule) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lichtenbaum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Reed-Solomon) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Schanuel) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Goldbach) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Erdos) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Erdos-Turan) . . .
(Abel) Snevily . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Drinfeld-Vladt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Langlands) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Riemann)zeta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Riemann) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BSD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Iwasawa) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(53)
(55)
(57)
(59)
(61)
(64)
(66)
(68)
(70)
(72)
(74)
(76)
(78)
(81)
(85)
(87)
(89)
(91)
(93)
(95)
(98)
(101)
(104)
(107)
(109)
(112)
(114)
(122)
(124)
(126)
(129)
(131)
(133)
(136)
(138)
vii
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (164)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (165)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (166)
Calabi-Yau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (168)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (170)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (172)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (174)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (177)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (179)
(Hopf) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (181)
(Hopf) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (184)
(Dirac) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (185)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (187)
K . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (189)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (191)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (192)
3 tight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (193)
4 (Poincare) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (195)
(Borel) :
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (196)
11
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (198)
8
Kashaev-Murakami-Murakami . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (200)
viii
10000
(Thurston) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( )
Virtual Haken . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Sullivan) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Smale) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( )
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
osp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Witt) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Kac-Moody) . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weisfeiler (Kac-Weisfeiler) . . . . . . . . .
(Einstein) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Dirac) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3n + 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Bloch) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Bochner-Riesz) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Brennan) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Fourier) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Julia) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Kakeya) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Koebe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Poincare) (Schoen) . . .
Sierpi
nski . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sierpi
nski . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Smale) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(202)
(203)
(205)
(207)
(209)
(211)
(213)
(215)
(217)
(219)
(220)
(222)
(224)
(226)
(228)
(230)
(232)
(235)
(238)
(241)
(243)
(245)
(249)
(251)
(252)
(255)
(257)
(260)
(262)
(265)
(266)
(268)
(270)
(272)
(274)
ix
(Hilbert) Lp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Borel) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Arnold) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dry Ten Martini . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(F
urstenberg) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Henon) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Hilbert) 16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Palis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Rohlin) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Veech . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Weinstein) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Seifert) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Hamilton) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pinsker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Polya) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Boltzmann) Boltzmann-Grad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Boltzmann) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Navier-Stokes) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Riemann) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
De Giorgi (Gibbons) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Von Neumann) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Weyl-Berry) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(276)
(278)
(280)
(283)
(284)
(287)
(289)
(291)
(293)
(295)
(297)
(299)
(301)
(304)
(307)
(310)
(312)
(315)
(317)
(320)
(322)
(324)
(327)
(330)
(332)
(334)
(336)
(339)
(341)
(344)
(347)
(349)
(352)
(356)
(359)
10000
(Schrodinger) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Green) . . . . . . .
AdS/CFT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Donaldson Seiberg-Witten . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Einstein) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gromov-Witten Virasoro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
KZB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Yang-Mills) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Penrose) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Yang-Baxter) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Hunt) Getoor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Hadamard) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hadwiger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Seymour) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Weiss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Chvatal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Ramsey) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
g- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Richard P. Stanley
(362)
(366)
(369)
(371)
(373)
(375)
(377)
(379)
(381)
(384)
(386)
(388)
(390)
(393)
(395)
(397)
(399)
(402)
(404)
(406)
(408)
(410)
(413)
(415)
(417)
(419)
(421)
(422)
(424)
(425)
(428)
(430)
(432)
(434)
(436)
xi
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-Szekeres(Erdos-Szekeres) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pfaffian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Richard P. Stanley
P=NP? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MQ ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Poincare) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Alexander Levin
(Rota-Baxter) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Atiyah) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
hp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(438)
(440)
(442)
(444)
(446)
(448)
(450)
(453)
(456)
(457)
(460)
(463)
(466)
(469)
(471)
(473)
(475)
(478)
(480)
(482)
(485)
(487)
(489)
(492)
(494)
(495)
(497)
(499)
(501)
(503)
(505)
(508)
(511)
(513)
(516)
xii
10000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (518)
d- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (521)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (523)
Lax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (525)
DFP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (527)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (529)
? . . . . . . . . . . . . (532)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (535)
1.5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (537)
k- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (539)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (541)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (543)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (544)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (546)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (549)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (553)
(Vaught)
(Vaught)
Vaughts Conjecture and The Topological Vaught Conjecture
(Vaught)
. [1] .
.
.
T , T
,
.
(Burgess) [2]
T , ,
, . ,
, .
. ,
.
(Becker) (Kechris) 20 90
X . G X
. , G X
, X Y .
.
T S ,
,
. S L1
.
,
. , Shelah, Lascar, Harrington, Makkai, Buechler,
Steel, Becker, Kechris Hjorth , .
, - , Shelah, Harrington Makkai [4]
; ,
[5] . [3].
10000
[1] Vaught R L. Denumerable models of complete theories // Infinitistic Methods: Proceedings of the Symposium on Foundations of Mathematics, PWN, Warsaw, 1961, 303-321
[2] Burgess J P. Equivalence generated by families of Borel sets // Proceedings of the
American Mathematical Society, 1978, 69: 323-326
[3] Becker H, Kechris A S. The Descriptive Set Theory of Polish Group Actions. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1996
[4] Shelah S, Harrington L A, Makkai M. A proof of Vaughts conjecture for -stable theories. Isreal Journal of Mathematics, 1984, 49: 259-280
[5] Becker H. Polish group actionsdichotomies and generalized elementary embeddings.
Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 1998, 11(2): 397-449
ZF L, .
L ,
ZF .
[3,4]
,
. , L , .
(Scott) 1961 [8] ,
L . (Solovay)[9]
U L[U ]. ,
U = U L[U ], L[U ] = L[U ]. L[U ] L
( [9]), (),
, .
, [10]
,
j:V M :
(1) M ; (2) < j(x) ; (3)
f M , f M .
Mitchell 35 (
[2]). , 30 , Mitchell[6,7] , Dodd
Jensen[1] Martin[5] Steel[5,7,11] Neeman Woodin ,
10000
. , ,
.
[1] Dodd A J, Jensen R B. The core model. Ann Math Logic, 1981, 20: 43-75
[2] Foreman, Matthew, Menachem Magidor and Saharon Shelah. Martins Maximum,
saturated ideals and non-regular unltrafilters. Part I, Annals of Mathematics, 1988,
127: 1-47
[3] G
odel Kurt F. The consistency of the Axiom of Choice and of the Generalized
Continuum-Hypothesis // Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, USA, 1938,
24: 556-557
[4] G
odel Kurt F. Consistency-proof of the Generalized Continuum-Hypothesis // Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, USA, 1939, 25: 220-224
[5] Martin D A, Steel J R. Iteration trees. Journal of American Math Soc, 1994, 7: 1-73
[6] Mitchell W J. Hypermeasurable cardinals. Logic Colloquium78(Boffa M et al, eds)
Stud. Logic Foundations Math. 97 North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam-New
York, 1979, 303-316
[7] Mitchell W J, Steel J R. Fine Structure and Iteration Trees. Berlin: Springer-Verlag,
1994
[8] Scott D S. Measurable cardinals and constructible sets. Bull Acad Polon Sci Ser Sci
Math Astronom Phy, 1961, 9: 521-524
[9] Silver J H. The consistency of the GCH with the existence of a measurable cardinal.
Axiomatic Set Theory, Proc Sympos Pure Math Vol XIII, Amer Math Soc, Providence,
R I, 1971, 391-395
[10] Solovay R M. Strongly compact cardinals and the GCH. Proceedings of the Tarski
Symposium(Henkin L et al, eds). Proc Sympos Pure Math Vol XXV, Amer Math Soc,
Providence, R I, 1974, 365-372
[11] Steel J R. The Core Model Iterability Problem. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1996
, ,
.
, ,
. 1982 Harrington Shelah . ,
. 1998 Lempp, Nies Slaman
. 50 ,
?
,
, .
10000
[1] Lempp S, Lerman M and Solomon R. Embedding finite lattices into the computably
enumerable degrees-a status survey // Chatzidakis Z, Keopke P and Pohlers W. Logic
Colloquium02, Lecture Notes in Logic, 27, ASL, Wellesley, MA, 2006
[2] Lerman M. Embeddings into the computably enumerable degrees // Cholak P, Lempp
S, Lerman M and Shore R A, eds. Computability theory and its applications(Boulder,
CO, 1999), Contemp Math, 257: 191-205. AMS, Providence, RI, 2000
(Borel)
(Borel)
Two Problems Related to Hyperfinite Borel Equivalence Relations
,
.
, Hjorth [1] .
X E
E . E
, ,
X hEn |1 6 n < i
(1) En X ;
(2) E1 E2 En En+1 ;
(3) E = 16n< En .
Dougherty, Jackson Kechris [2]
.
X
? , X
, hEn |1 6 n < i X ,
S
En En+1 , E X , E =
En ,
1<n<
, E ?
. ,
?
(amenable)
?
Weiss ( [2]),
.
, , .
. ,
[3] .
10000
[1] Hjorth G. Classfication and Orbit Equivalence Relations. American Mathematical Society, RI, 2000
[2] Dougherty R, Jackson S and Kechris A S. The structure of hyperfinite Borel equivalence
relations. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 1994, 341: 193-225
[3] Gao S, Jackson S. Countable Abelian group actions and hyperfinite equivalence relations.
Preprint, 2007
10000
10
r = r ? s = s ?
r = r ? and s = s ?
ZFC r = r ?
r = min{|R| : R [] , x , y R(|y x| < |y x| < )},
r = min{|R| : R [] , xn (xn : n ), y R,
n(|y xn | < |y xn | < )}.
r R []
(xn )n , A R (xn )nA . (xn )n 2 ,
r. . Vojtas
[3] . [1] r < r .
s = s ? ,
s = min{|A| : A [] , x [] , a A(|x a| = |x a| = )},
s = min{|A| : A [] , B [[] ] , a A, b B(|b a| = |b a| = )}.
Malyhin , [4][5].
[1] Brendle J, Just W, Laflamme C. On the refinement and countable refinement number.
Questions and Answers in General Topology, 2000, 18: 123-128
[2] Vaughan J. Small uncountable cardinals and topology // Van Mill J, Reed G M. Open
problems in Topology. North-Holland, 1990, 196-218
[3] Vojtas P. More on set-theoretic characteristics of summability of regular (Toeplitz).
Comment Math Univ Carolinae, 1998, 39: 269-279
[4] Kamburelis A, Weglorz B. Splitting. Archive for mathematical Logic, 1996, 35: 265-277
[5] Brendle J. Around Splitting and reaping. Comment Math Univ Carolinas, 1998, 39:
269-279
11
10000
12
[1] Cohen Paul J. The independence of the Continuum Hypothesis I. Proceedings of National
Academy of Sciences, USA, 1963, 50: 1143-1148
[2] Cohen Paul J. The independence of the Continuum Hypothesis II. Proceedings of National
Academy of Sciences, USA, 1964, 51: 105-110
[3] G
odel Kurt F. The consistency of the Axiom of Choice and of the Generalized Continuum
Hypothesis. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, USA, 1938, 24: 556-557
[4] G
odel Kurt F. Consistency-proof of the Generalized Continuum-Hypothesis. Proceedings
of National Academy of Sciences, USA, 1939, 25: 220-224
[5] Foreman, Matthew, Menachem Magidor and Saharon Shelah. Martins Maximum, saturated ideals and non-regular unltrafilters. Part I, Annals of Mathematics, 1988, 127:
1-47
[6] Woodin Hugh W. The Axiom of Determinacy, Forcing Axioms, and the Nonstationary
Ideal. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1999
13
,
+1 .
,
.
Silver[7]
. , Jensen [1] ,
. Magidor[5] ,
.
. , , Foreman Woodin[3]
. , .
, ?
?
10000
14
.
n n
n+1 , 1 ( 1 )?
Silver [7] , Galvin Hajnal[4]
. , Shelah .
pcf . ,
, Shelah () ,
4 . Shelah pcf
|a| < min(a) a, |pcf (a)| = |a|?
[6].
[1] Devlin K J, Jensen R B. Marginalia to a Theorem of Silver. Berlin: Springer-Verlag,
1975, 115-142
[2] Easton W B. Powers of regular cardinals. Annals of Mathematical Logic, 1970, 1: 139178
[3] Foreman M, Hugh Woodin W. The generalized continuum hypothesis can fail everywhere. Annals of Mathematics, 1991, 133(2): 1-35
[4] Galvin F, Hajnal A. Inequalities for cardinal powers. Annals of Mathematics, 1975,
101(2): 491-498
[5] Magidor M. On the singular cardinal problem. II, Annals of Mathematics, 1977, 106(2):
514-547
[6] Shelah S. Cardinal Arithmetic. New York: The Clarendon Press, Oxford University
Press, 1994
[7] Silver J H. On the singular cardinal problem // Vancouer B C. Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, 1974, Vol 1, Canad Math Congress, Montreal,
Que, 1975, 265-268
15
(Sacks) (Post)
(Martin)
Sacks Problem on Degree Invariant Solution of
Post Problem and Martins Conjecture
, ,
00 . ,
? 1944
. (Friedberg)
(Muchnik) 50 ,
,
.
, .
, , ,
. (Sacks)
.
W : 2 2
A, A <T W (A) <T A0 , W , e
A, W (A) = WeA ; W A B, A T B
W (A) T W (B).
(AD) ,
(Martin) .
, .
ZF + AD + DC,
(1) f : 2 2 , f ,
();
(2) 6 f 6 g f (x) 6
0
T g(x), 6 , f f ,
f 0 (A) = (f (A))0 .
(2) ,
, (Borel) ,
10000
16
; ,
. Lachlan 1975
, . Downey Shore 1997
. ,
Steel(1982), Slaman Steel(1988) Becker(1988) .
[1] Becker H. A characterization of jump operators. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1988, 53:
708-728
[2] Downey R, Shore R A. There is no degree invariant half-jump. Proc Am Math Soc,
1997, 125: 3033-3037
[3] Friedberg R M. Two recursively enumerable sets of incomparable degrees of unsolvability. Proc Nat Ac Sci, 1957, 43: 236-238
[4] Lachlan A H. Uniform enumeration operators. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1975, 40:
401-409
[5] Martin D A. The axiom of determinacy and reduction principles in the analytic hierarchy. Bull Am Math Soc, 1968, 74: 687-689
[6] Muchnik A A. On the unsolvability of the problem of reducibility in the theory of
algorithms. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR N S 1956, 108: 29-32
[7] Post E L. Recursively enumerable sets of positive integers and their decision problems.
Bull Am Math Soc, 1944, 50: 84-316
[8] Sacks G E. Degrees of Unsolvability. Princeton: Princeton University Press, NJ 1963;
2nd ed. 1966
[9] Slaman T, Steel J R. Definable functions on degrees. in Cabal Seminar 81-85, Kechris
A S, Martin D A and Steel eds J R., LNMS 1333. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1988: 37-55
[10] Steel J R. A classification of jump operators. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1982, 47:
347-358
(Turing)
17
(Turing)
The Turing Equivalence Problem
.
x y , x T y, x y
.
(Borel) , T
?
X , X E (Borel)
E X X .
, . X Y
, E F X Y . E
F , E 6B F , E X Y
f : X Y F
x1 , x2 X,
, ,
. ,
[1] .
.
F2 , 2F2 ,
. .
. ,
. , Slaman Steel
[2] (hyperfinite) .
, Kechris [3] ,
Martin .
10000
18
[1] Dougherty R, Jackson S and Kechris A S. The structure of hyperfinite Borel equivalence
relations. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 1994, 341: 193-225
[2] Slaman T, Steel J R. Definable functions on degrees // Cabal Seminar 81-85, Lecture
Notes in Math, 1333, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1988, 37-55
[3] Kechris A S. Amenable equivalence relations and Turing degrees. Journal of Symbolic
Logic, 1991, 56(1): 182-194
(Turing)
19
(Turing)
The Rigidity Problem in Turing Degrees
1936 (Turing) ,
. ,
. .
, . D , D
. D
, .
, , D ,
. .
. ( [1])
D ?
. , Slaman Woodin
,
[4] D , , p~ d p~
X , X d D
.
D .
. ,
D , D
. ,
, Slaman Woodin
000 .
Slaman Woodin ,
,
. , g, g
, .
[1] Rogers H Jr. Some problems of definability in recursive function theory // J N Crossley,
20
10000
ed. Sets, Model and Recursion Theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1967, 183-201
[2] Slaman T A. Global Properties of the Turing Degrees and the Turing Jump // Proceedings of Singapore Workshop Website: http: // math. berkerkey.edu/ slaman/papers
/IMS slaman.pdf
[3] Slaman T A, Woodin W H. Definability in the Turing degrees. Illinois J Math, 1986,
30(2): 320-334
[4] Slaman T A, Woodin W H. Definability in degree structures. preprint Website: http:
// math. berkerkey. edu/ slaman/talks/sw.pdf
21
10000
22
Cherlin-Zilber
23
Cherlin-Zilber
Cherlin-Zilber Conjecture
G.Cherlin[1] Boris Zilber[2] 30
. .
Cherlin-Zilber Morley
.
30 ,
. ,
, .
Borovik Nesin [3] .
. ,
o Cherlin Peterzil, Pillay Starchenko[4] .
[1] Cherlin G. Groups of small Morley rank. Ann Math Logic, 1979, 17: 1-28
[2] Zilber B I. Groups and rings whose theory is categorical. Fundam Math, 1977, 95:
173-188
[3] Borovik A V, Nesin A. Groups of Finite Morley Rank. New York: Oxford University
Press, 1994
[4] Peterzil Yaacov, Pillay Anand, Starchenko Sergei. Simple groups definable in o-minimal
structures. Logic Colloquium96 (San Sebastian). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1998, 211218
10000
24
),
(, Tarski ,
. ,
Tarski .). Tarski
. Tarski
. ,
L = {+, , 0, 1} Lexp = {+, , 0, 1, exp}. Tarski
L . Lexp
. , .
,
. Wilkie 1991 [4] , ,
, Th(Rexp ) (
). Khovanski ,
Rexp o . , MacIntyre Wilkie[3]
Shanuel , Rexp .
Th(Rexp ) , . ,
Th(Rexp ) , (2 )
. , , . ,
[1].
[1] Marker D. Model theory and exponentiation. Notices Amer Math Soc, 1996, 43(7):
753-759
[2] Tarski A. A Decision Method for Elementary Algebra and Geometry. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif, 1948
[3] Macintyre A, Wilkie A J. On the decidability of the real exponential field. Kreiseliana,
441467, A K Peters, Wellesley, MA, 1996
25
[4] Wilkie A. Model completeness results for expansions of the ordered field of real numbers
by restricted Pfaffian functions and the exponential function. J Amer Math Soc, 1996,
9(4): 1051-1094
10000
26
Shelah
Shelah Categoricity Conjecture
Shelah .
Morley
L T , T
( T
), , T .
Shelah
L L1 , (,
, )
T , T i1 (
T ), , T
i1 .
[1] , Shelah
K . K Hanf
Hanf(K) , K Hanf
Hanf(K) .
, [2].
[1] Shelah S. Classification Theory and the Number of Non-isomorphic Models. 2nd edition.
Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1990
[2] Grossberg R, VanDieren M. Shelahs categoricity conjecture from a successor for tame
abstract elementary classes. J Symbolic Logic, 2006, 71(2): 553-568
27
0 ? , DCF0
, Hrushovski . , [1] [3].
[1] Hrushovski E, Itai M M. On model complete differential fields. Trans Amer Math Soc,
2003, 355(11): 4267-4296
[2] Marker D. The number of countable differentially closed fields. Notre Dame J Formal
Logic, 2007, 48(1): 99-113
[3] Marker D. Model theory of differential fields. Model theory, algebra, and geometry,
53-63, Math Sci Res Inst Publ, 39, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press, 2000
28
10000
3-Calabi-Yau
Classifications of 3-Calabi-Yau Algebras
k , d , A k- . X, Y A,
k- HomA (X, Y ) HomA (Y, X[d]) , k- , [d] d
, X Y , A d-CY .
Kontsevich 1998 [8] , Costello,
Keller, Ginzburg [24,6] .
. , A-mod k- A .
Id
A , A-mod d-CY d+1 =
A-mod .
H Hopf , H-mod d-CY
k d + 1 - . , k G ,
kG-mod d-CY d + 1 - ,
(syzygy) .
k- A d-CY , Db (A-mod) d-CY .
A Ae := A k Aop . A d-CY , A (
A Ae - ), Ae -
(
0, i 6= d,
i
e
HH (A, A ) =
A, i = d,
HHi (A, Ae )
= ExtiAe (A, Ae ) Hochschild .
Keller[5] A d-CY , A d-CY .
d, d-CY . , k[x1 , , xd ] d-CY . A d-CY
. Bocklandt[1] : A
2-CY , A Dynkin . 2-CY
. 3-CY , . ,
B-Model n Calabi-Yau X
Db (Coh(X)) : Db (Coh(X)) 3-CY , ,
3-Calabi-Yau
29
3-CY .
A = khx1 , , xn i, Kontsevich[7] /xi : A/[A,
A] A; A/[A, A], U(A, ) = A/h/xi , 1 6 i 6 ni.
A . Ginzburg[3] 3-CY
, Bocklandt[1] 3-CY .
Ginzburg[3] :
3-CY F , A
A/[A, A], F
= U(A, ).
, Bocklandt[1] : 3-CY
. , 3-CY , Ginzburg
, .
[1] Bocklandt R. Graded Calabi Yau algebras of dimension 3, with an appendix The signs
of Serre functor by M Van den Bergh. J Pure Appl Algebra, 2008, 212(1): 14-32
[2] Costello K. Topological conformal field theories and Calabi-Yau categories. Adv Math,
2007, 210(1): 165-214
[3] Ginzburg V. Calabi-Yau algebras. Available at arXiv: AG/0612139
[4] Keller B. On triangulated orbit categories. Documenta Math, 2005, 10: 551-581
[5] Keller B. Calabi-Yau triangulated categories. preprint, 2008
[6] Keller B, Reiten I. Cluster-tilted algebras are Gorenstein and stably Calabi-Yau. Adv
Math, 2007, 211(1): 123-151
[7] Kontsevich M. Formal (non)commutative sympletic geometry. The Gelfand Math Seminars, 1990-1992, 173-187. Boston: Birkhauser, 1993
Superieure, Paris, Notes taken by Bellalche J, Dat J F, Marin I, Racinet G, and Randriambololona H, 1998
10000
30
(Artin) Gr
obner-Shirshov
Grobner-Shirshov Bases for The Artin Groups
(braid) . ,
, .
,
. , G = gphX|Ri X R ,
X F R F .
, G (normal form) (word)
(conjugacy) . G ,
() , G
(). G a, b , g G a = g 1 bg.
(
). A.I. Shirshov 1962 Grobner-Shirshov ,
. GrobnerShirshov ()
.
, Grobner-Shirshov .
khXi k X , X X
, . X w, |w| w . X
(well ordered) , f = f + i ui khXi, , i k, f, ui X ,
ui < f. f f . f 1, f 1 . f g
khXi 1 , w X , f g : (i)
a, b X w = fb = a
g |f| + |
g | > |w|, (f, g)w = f b ag
f g w . (ii) a, b X w = f = a
g b,
(f, g)w = f agb f g w .
S khXi S 1 . i k, ai , bi X , si S
P
(f, g)w =
i ai si bi ai si bi < w, (f, g)w S . S
< S , S khXi
Grobner-Shirshov .
X > ,
uv (u > v
(Artin) Gr
obner-Shirshov
31
, , .
Grobner-Shirshov .
Composition-Diamond [4,10] k , Id(S) khXi S
, A = khX|Si = khXi/Id(S), < X , :
(i) S khXi Gr
obner-Shirshov ;
(ii) f Id(S), s S, a, b X , f = a
sb;
(iii) Irr(S) = {u X |u 6= a
sb, s S, a, b X } A = khX|Si
.
khXi S Grobner-Shirshov ,
S , khXi S GrobnerShirshov S c . Shirshov .
A = sgphX|Si , S khXi . Shirshov
khXi Grobner-Shirshov S c Irr(S c ) A
. S c A Grobner-Shirshov .
Artin 1926 n 1 : Bn = gph1 , ,
n1 | i j = j i (i 1 > j), i+1 i i+1 = i i+1 i i . Markov
Artin 1945 1947 Artin-Burau si,j , s1
i,j (1 6 i < j 6
1
1
n), i (1 6 i 6 n1) Bn , si,j = j1 i+1 i2 i+1
j1
.
[9]
Artin 1947 . Garside Artin-Garside
, 1 , i (1 6 i 6 n 1, = 1 2 1 n2 1 n1 1 )
Bn . Birman-KoLee 1998 Bn Bn = gphats (1 6 s < t 6 n)|Ri,
1
1
ats = (t1 s+1 )s (s+1
t1
), 1 6 s < t 6 n, R = {ats arq = arq ats , (t
r)(t q)(s r)(s q) > 0, ats asr = atr ats = asr atr , 1 6 r < s < t 6 n}.
Bn , , Bn
.
Bokut-Chainikov-Shum (arXiv:0806.1124) Artin-Burau Bn
Grobner-Shirshov Markov-Artin . Bokut-Fong-Ke-Shiao
(arxiv:0806.1118v1) Artin-Garside Bn+ = sgph1 , ,
n1 |i j = j i (i 1 > j), i+1 i i+1 = i i+1 i i Grobner-Shirshov .
, Bokut (arxiv:0806.1125v1) Bn ArtinGarside
Grobner-Shirshov , Bn Garside . Bokut
(arXiv:0806.1123v1) (Birman-Ko-Lee ) Bn Grobner-Shirshov .
32
10000
(Artin) Gr
obner-Shirshov
33
2008 .
EasdownLavers[8] IBn = sgphx, i , i1 , 1 6 i 6
n1| R3 i, R3 = {x = x2 = x12 = 12 x, x1 x = x1 x1 = 1 x1 x, i+1 i i+1 =
i i+1 i , i i1 = i1 i = 1, xi = i x (i > 1), i j = j i (|i j| > 1)}.
);
(2) Artin Bn , Dn , G2 , F4 , E6 , E7 , E8 Artin-Burau
Grobner-Shirshov ;
(3) Artin Artin-Garside Grobner-Shirshov ;
(4) Artin Birman-Ko-Lee Grobner-Shirshov ;
(5) (1)-(3) Artin ;
(6) SBn Artin-Garside Birman-Ko-Lee
Grobner-Shirshov ;
(7) V Bn , welded W Bn , IBn
B(W ) Grobner-Shirshov .
[1] Bannai E. Fundamental groups of the spaces of regular orbits of the finite unitary
reflection groups of dimension 2. J Math Soc Japan, 1976, 28: 447-454
[2] Bessis D, Michel J. Explicit presentations for exceptional braid groups. Experimental
Mathematics, 2004, 13(3): 257-266
[3] Bokut L A, Shiao L-S. Gr
obner-Shirshov bases for Coxeter groups. Comm Algebra,
2001, 29: 4305-4319
[4] Bokut L A, Shum K P. Gr
obner and Gr
obner-Shirshov bases in algebra: an elmentary
approach. SEA Bull Math, 2005, 29: 227-252
[5] Brieskorn E, Saito K. Artin-Gruppen und Coxeter-Gruppen. Invent Math, 1972, 17:
245-271
[6] Broue M, Malle G and Rouquier R. Complex reflection groups, braid groups, Hecke
algebras. J reine angew Math, 1998, 500: 127-190
34
10000
[7] Deligne P. Les immeubles des groupes de tresses generalises. Invent Math, 1972, 17:
273-302
[8] Easdown D, Lavers T G. The inverse braid monoid. Adv Math, 2004, 186(2): 438-455
[9] Garside F A. The braid group and other groups. Quart J Math Oxford Ser, 1969,
20(2): 235-254
[10] Shirshov A I. Some algorithmic problem for Lie algebras. Sibirsk Mat Z, 1962(3):
292-296 (in Russian); English translation in SIGSAM Bull, 1999, 33: 2, 3-6
[11] Tits J. Normalisateurs de tores. I Groupes de Coxeter etendus, J Algebra, 1966, 4:
96-116
L. Bokut
(Broue)
35
(Broue)
Broues Abelian Defect Group Conjecture
Broue .
, ,
. G. Frobenius, W. Burnside
I. Schur 1896 1910 , Brauer
1935 40 . , Green
, Alperin, Broue Puig ,
, ,
.
20 80 , Broue Rickard
, , ,
.
R p-adic Qp L ,
F. G, B RG , D, b0 B
Brauer , Db (modB) Db (modb0 ).
Broue G, B RG , D
, b0 B Brauer , Db (modB) Db (modb0 )
.
Broue , ,
B b0 ,
Hochschild K- .
Broue
, , .
. Broue
, . Broue
.
10000
36
[1] Michel Broue. Blocs, isometries parfaites. categories derivees C R Acad Sci Paris Ser I
Math, 1988, 307(1): 13-18
[2] Broue M. Rickard equivalences and block theory. In Groups 0 93 Galway/St. Andrews,
Vol. 1 (Galway, 1993): 58-79. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995
[3] Jeremy Rickard. The abelian defect group conjecture // Proceedings of the International
Congress of Mathematicians, Vol. II (Berlin, 1998), number Extra Vol. II, 1998, 121-128
(electronic)
[4] Raphael Rouquier. Some examples of Rickard complexes. An Stiint Univ Ovidius
Constanta Ser Mat, 1996, 4(2): 169-173, Representation theory of groups, algebras, and
orders (Constanta, 1995)
(Brown)
37
(Brown)
Browns Question
Hopf () ,
. 20 40 H. Hopf Lie ()
Hopf , Hopf 30 . 1969
Sweedler [1] , 20 70 Hopf
. Hopf 20 80 [2,3] .
Hopf . Hopf
, ( PI ). , Hopf
Frobenius , . Brown Goodearl
Hopf () [4] , [5,Question A]
PI Hopf H ( Gorenstein ).
2002 [6,Theorem0.1] . ,
, . [7, Question E] .
Brown Hopf Artin-Schelter Gorenstein
Hopf H Artin-Schelter Gorenstein, H d
ExtiH (k, H)
= i,d k, i,d Kronecker , k H.
Brown , . , Hopf
[8] [9] .
, , Gelfand-Kirillov Hopf . Brown
, Radford S 4 Hopf [8] .
, Hopf , Brown
(1) (polycyclic-by-finite group) ;
(2) Lie g U(g);
(3) Oq (G), G ;
(4) Uq (g);
(5) Hopf PI Hopf ;
(6) Hopf .
, .
10000
38
[1] Sweedler M E. Hopf Algebras. Benjamin, 1969
[2] Drinfeld V D. Hopf algebras and the quantum Yang-Baxter equation. Sov Math Dokl,
1985, 32: 254-258
[3] Jimbo M. A q-difference analogue of U (g) and the Yang-Baxter equation. Lett Math
Physics, 1985, 10: 63-69
[4] Brown K A, Goodearl K R. Homological aspects of Noetherian PI Hopf algebras and
irreducible modules of maximal dimension. J Algebra, 1997, 198: 240-265
[5] Brown K A. Representation theory of Noetherian Hopf algebras satisfying a polynomial
identity. Trends in the representation theory of finite-dimensional algebras (Seattle,
WA, 1997), 49-79, Contemp Math, 229, American Mathematical Society, Providence,
RI, 1998
[6] Wu Q S, Zhang J J. Noetherian PI Hopf algebras are Gorenstein. Trans Amer Math
Soc, 2002, 355: 1043-1066
[7] Brown K A. Noetherian Hopf algebras. Turkish J Math, 2007, 31: suppl, 7-23 (arXiv:
0709. 2334v1)
[8] Brown K A, Zhang J J. Dualising complexes and twisted Hochschild (co)homology for
noetherian Hopf algebras. J Algebra (to appear)
[9] Lu D M, Wu Q S and Zhang J J. Homological integral of Hopf algebras. Trans Amer
Math Soc, 2007, 359: 4945-4975
1
2
(Cayley)
39
(Cayley)
Cayley Graphs and Related Problems
Cayley Arthur Cayley 1878 , .
Cayley , ,
, [1]. Cayley . G
S x S , , G S Cayley
Cay(G, S) G, x, y y Sx.
, G Cay(G, S) . ,
Cayley . , A Cay(G, S) , A = GH,
H , A G . , Cayley
, [5][7].
1 G = XY X, Y X
, Y .
, [5][7]. s- ,
s . s- .
Tutte-Weiss , s 7. s- Cayley
. 1 .
2 s- Cayley . , s > 1 Cayley
.
, ,
[5][7]. , G 2p , p = n2 + n + 1
. n > 8, S G n+1 , Cay(p)=Cay(G, S),
Cay(p) 3, 3 Cay(p) n
-Desarguesian , [2][4].
, . ,
3 p = n2 + n + 1 n > 8, Cay(p)
2.
[1] Babai L. Automorphism groups. isomorphism, reconstruction, Handbook of Combina-
40
10000
(Foulkes)
41
(Foulkes)
Foulkes Conjecture
20 40 , Littlewood [3] Schur ,
plethysm, .
. , , s , s Schur
X i
i
1
2
, s =
xa , xa , s s = s (xa , xa , ).
i>1
f, g Schur N , f g Schur
N .
p, q , p, q p, q (p, 0, ), (q, 0, ).
Foulkes [1] p, q sp sq Schur ,
Foulkes
p > q , sp sq Schur sq sp
.
Frobenius
,
Schur s . Frobenius ,
Foulkes
, p > q , 1Spq
1Spq
.
p oSq
q oSp
( [5][8]), .
q
p
z
}|
{
z
}|
{
. Yp = Sp Sp , Yq = Sq Sq .
Sp o Sq ,Sq o Sp Young Yp , Yq Spq . LittlewoodS
S
S
Richard 1Yppq , 1Yqpq , 1Yppq
S
S
S
1Yqpq , 1Yppq 1Yqpq
S
,
. 1Spq
p oSq
Young . Young
20 ,
.
10000
42
Foulkes , ( [4][6]
[7]). .
Foulkes [7] n = pq, q 6 p, c, d cd = n, c, d > b,
1SSnp oSq 1SSnd oSc .
Foulkes
(1) (Thrall, 1942) b = 2, a > 2;
(2) (Littlewood, 1944 ) b = 3, a 6 6, b = 4, a 6 5 a = 6, b 6 4;
(3) (M. Brion, 1993) a b ;
(4) (S. Dent, J. Siemons, 2000) b = 3, a > 3;
(5) (T. Mckay, 2008) b = 4, a > 4.
[1] Foulkes H O. Concomitants of the quintic and sextic up to degree four in the coefficient
of the ground form. J London Math Soc, 1950, 25: 205-209
[2] Hower R. (GLn , GLm )-duality and symmetric plethysm. Proc Indian Acad Sci, 1997,
85-109
[3] Littlewood D E. Invariant theory, tensors and group characters. Phil Trans Royal Soc,
1944, 239
[4] Mckay T. On Plethysm conjectures of Stanley and Foulkes. J Algebra, 2008, 319: 20502071
[5] Stanley R P. Enumerative combinatorics. Volumn 2 Cambridge Studies in Advanced
Mathematics, 62
[6] Stanly R P. Positivity problems and conjectures in algebraic combinatorics // Mathematics: Frontiers and Perspectives, Amer Math Soc, 2000, 295-319
[7] Vessenes R. Generalized Foulkes Conjecture and Tableaux Construction. J Algebra,
2004, 277(2): 579-614
[8] Wu Jie. http://www.math.nus.edu.sg/matwujie/Foulkes.pdf
(Gorenstein)
43
(Gorenstein)
Gorenstein Symmetric Conjecture
k Artin , A k- . A Artin , k- , A
. A- . A- A M ,
proj.dim A M inj.dim A M . , A- NA , proj.dim NA
inj.dim NA . A , A A AA ,
.
Gorenstein
.
Artin A Gorenstein , inj.dim A A
inj.dim AA . inj.dim A A = inj.dim AA , [1][9]. [2]
13 . Gorenstein ,
, .
Gorenstein .
A-mod A- , P < (A) A-mod
10000
44
1
2
(Kaplansky)
45
(Kaplansky)
Kaplanskys 6th Conjecture
Kaplansky Kaplansky 1975 Hopf
. Hopf
, Kaplansky ,
.
k 0 , G . Frobenius
kG G . Lie
Hopf . 1975 , Kaplansky Bialgebras [3] Hopf
, , Frobenius
. .
Kaplansky
H Hopf , H
H .
Hopf ,
. H k Hopf . Zhu 1993
Kaplansky [5] , . char(k) = 0H
R(H) H H R(H) H
H , Kaplansky . Nichols Richmond 1996
H Grothendieck [4] H 2 H . 1998 Etingof Gelaki
Hopf [1] H Hopf , D(H) H
Drinfeld double, D(H) H .
H Hopf , H H
10000
46
(Nakayama) (Nakayama)
47
(Nakayama) (Nakayama)
Nakayama Conjecture and Generalized Nakayama Conjecture
Nakayama , T.Nakayama
1958 . Nakayama .
1995 , M. Auslander, I. Reiten S. Smal [2]
Nakayama Nakayama 4 .
20 ,
. ,
, ,
.
. Auslander-Reiten
,
,
.
Nakayama [5]
Artin 0 I0 I1 I2
. j > 0, Ij , .
Nakayama . 20 , B.M
uller
H.Tachikawa Nakayama .
Nakayama [6] .
Nakayama ,
, 1975 M. Auslander I. Reiten Nakayama
.
, Nakayama . R. R. Colby
K. R. Fuller Nakayama , M. Auslander I.Reiten
k-Gorenstein Auslander-Reiten . Nakayama ,
( [9]). G. V. Wilson[7] K. R. Fuller
B. Zimmermann-Huisgen[4] Nakayama P.
10000
48
, Nakayama , J Jacobson .
[8,9] , , Nakayama Nakayama
. Nakayama Nakayama
,
.
[1] Auslander M, Reiten I. On a generalized version of the Nakayama conjecture. Proc
Amer Math Soc, 1975, 52: 69-74
[2] Auslander M, Reiten I and Smal S. Representation Theory of Artin Algebras. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press, 1995
[3] Dr
axler P and Happel D. A proof of the generalized Nakayama conjecture for algebras
with J 2l+1 = 0 and A/J l representation finite. J Pure and Appl Algebra, 1992, 78:
161-164
[4] Fuller K R, Huisgen-Zimmermann B. On the generalized Nakayama conjecture and the
Cartan determinant problem. Trans Amer Math Soc, 1986, 294: 679-691
[5] Nakayama T. On algebras with complete homology. Abh Math Sem Univ Hamburg,
1958, 22: 300-307
[6] Tachikawa H. Quasi-Frobenius rings and generalizations. QF-3 and QF-1 rings, Notes
by Claus Michael Ringel. Berlin-New York: Springer-Verlag, 1973
[7] Wilson G. The Cartan map on categories of graded modules. J Algebra, 1983, 85:
390-398
[8] . . , 2007, 36(1): 14-17
[9] Yamagata K. Frobenius Algebras // Hazewinkel M ed. Handbook of Algebra. Vol. 1.
Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1996, 841-887
(Ramras)
49
(Ramras)
Ramras Question
1974 Ramras[1] scalar ?
50
10000
1
2
Smashing
51
Smashing
An Open Problem on Smashing Subcategories
T , S . S T
, S . S, S T
, S ( Bousfield ). ,
, S smashing . T X ,
HomT (X, ) : T Z-Mod ; T ,
I, T I T .
T , T smashing
. , T
smashing [2] . T , T
smashing , T smashing .
Ravenel[10] Bousfield[3] .
Neeman[9] noetherian
10000
52
. T smashing T smashing
. Krause[5]
T , T smashing
. ,
.
.
[1] Benson D J, Iyengar S B and Krause H. Localizing subcategories of the stable module
category of a finite group. preprint
[2] B
okstedt M and Neeman A. Homotopy limits in triangulated categories. Compositio
Math, 1993, 86: 209-234
[3] Bousfield A K. The localization of spectra with respect to homology. Topology, 1979,
18: 257-281
[4] Keller B. A remark on the generalized smashing conjecture. Manuscripta Math, 1994,
84: 193-198
[5] Krause H. Smashing subcategories and the telescope conjecturean algebraic approach. Invent Math, 2000, 139: 99-133
[6] Krause H, Solberg . Applications of cotorsion pairs. J London Math Soc, 2003, 68:
631-650
[7] Mahowald M. The image of J in the EHP sequence. Ann of Math (2), 1982, 116(1):
65-112
[8] Miller H R. On relations between Adams spectral, with an application to the stable
homotopy of a Moore space. J Pure Appl Algebra, 1981, 20(3): 287-312
[9] Neeman A. The chromatic tower for D(R). Topology, 1992, 31: 519-532
[10] Ravenel D C. Localization with respect to certain periodic homology theories. Amer
J Math, 1984, 106: 351-414
(Bass-Quillen)
53
-- (Bass-Quillen)
Bass-Quillen Conjecture
. R , R[x1 , x2 , ,
xn ] R n . 1955 , (JPSerre)[7]
K , K[x1 , x2 , , xn ]
?
, . n = 1 , K[x] , K[x]
. n > 1 , , 1976
(D. Quillen)[5] (A. Suslin)[8]
. K[x1 , x2 , , xn ]
.
, . M
R[x1 , x2 , , xn ]- , R- M0 M
= R[x1 , x2 , , xn ] R M0 ,
M R- . , K[x1 , x2 , , xn ]
K- .
-- R (Noether) , R[x1 , x2 , , xn ]
R- (
).
R , R[x]
().
. 1976 ,
K-
. K- ,
. , [3]. ,
R = K[[x1 , x2 , , xd ]] K d ( d
), R[x] .
. , Dedekind ( Dedekind
), ; R
Krull 6 2, R Krull 3 R 2 3,
. , .
10000
54
, Pr
ufer ( Pr
ufer
).
[1] Bass H. Some problems in classicalalgebraic K-theory // Algebraic K-Theory II.
Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1973, 170
[2] Bhatwadekar S M, Rao R A. On a question of Quillen. Trans Amer Math Soc, 1983,
279: 801-810
[3] Lam T Y. Serres Problem on Projective Modules. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2006
[4] Lequain Y, Simis A. Projective modules over R[x1 , , xn ], R a Pr
ufer domain. J Pure
Appl Algebra, 1980, 18: 165-171
[5] Quillen D. Projective modules over polynomial rings. Invent Math, 1976, 36: 167-171
[6] Rao R A. The Bass-Quillen conjecture in dimension three but characteristic 6= 2, 3 via
a question of a Suslin. Invent Math, 1988, 93: 609-618
[7] Serre J P. Faisceaux algebriques coherents (in French). Ann of Math, 1955, 61(2):
197-278
[8] Suslin A A. Projective modules over polynomial rings are free (in Russian). Dolk Akad
Nauk SSSR, 1976, 229: 1063-1066. English Translation: Soviet Math Dokl, 1976, 17:
1160-1164
Brauer
55
Brauer
The Representation Theory for Non-semisimple Brauer Algebras
20 , I. Schur [7] GLn (C) .
Schur-Weyl , Schur GLn (C) r
Sr .
1937 , R. Brauer [1] , ,
Br (), Schur . Brauer
Brauer , Sp2m (C) On (C)
.
Brauer . Brauer
, . [9] , H. Weyl
Brauer . Weyl Br () , > r.
, Br () . 1 6 6 r 1 , Br () .
, Br () .
20 80 , P. Hanlon D. Wales
Brauer . H. Wenzl [8] . 2004 , [6]
Brauer , Br ()
.
Br () , J. Graham G. Lehrer Br ()
[5] . Br () .
Brauer .
. r! , Br ()
, Br () .
, Brauer [2,4] , Brauer
. , Dipper, Doty [3] Brauer
Schur-Weyl . , Brauer
, .
10000
56
[1] Brauer R. On algebras which are connected with the semisimple continuous groups.
Ann Math, 1937, 38: 857-872
[2] Cox A, Visscher N and Martin P. The blocks of the Brauer algebras in characteristic
zero. arXiv: math/0601387
[3] Dipper R, Doty S and Hu J. Brauers centralizer algebras, symplectic Schur algebras
and Schur-Weyl duality. Trans AMS, 2008, 360: 189-215
[4] Donkin S, Tange R. The Brauer algebras and the symplectic Schur algebras. arXiv:
0806.4500
[5] Graham J and Lehrer G. Cellular algebras. Invent Math, 1996, 123: 1-34
[6] Rui H. A criterion on semisimple Brauer algebras. J Comb Theory, Ser A, 2005, 111:
78-88
57
,
. ()
[2] . . 20 ,
Artin, Schelter, Tate Van den Bergh[35] ()P2 . ,
Artin , proj A ,
A Gelfand-Kirillov 3 . 2001
Stafford Van den Bergh [6] ,
. , Van den Bergh
Blowing-up Blowing-down[7] . ,
. Artin
2 PI() ruled() Sklyanin
, . , Chan, Ingalls Kulkarni
PI [811] Artin de Jong (). PI
, Keeler, Rogalski Stafford[1214]
.
. , ,
10000
58
.
[1] Artin M and Zhang J J. Noncommutative projective schemes. Adv Math, 1994, 109:
228-287
[2] Artin M and Stafford J T. Noncommutative graded domains with quadratic growth.
Invent Math, 1995, 122: 231-276
[3] Artin M and Schelter W F. Graded algebras of global dimension 3. Adv Math, 1987,
66: 171-216
[4] Artin M, Tate J and Van den Bergh M. Some algebras associated to automorphisms of
elliptic curves. The Grothendieck Festschrift, Vol. I, 33-85, Progr Math, 86, Birkh
auser
Boston, Boston, MA, 1990
[5] Artin M, Tate J and Van den Bergh M. Modules over regular algebras of dimension 3.
Invent Math, 1991, 106: 335-388
[6] Stafford J T, Van den Bergh M. Noncommutative curves and noncommutative surfaces.
Bull Amer Math Soc, 2001, 38: 171-216
[7] Van den Bergh M. Blowing up of non-commutative smooth surfaces. Mem Amer Math
Soc, 2001, 154
[8] Chan D. Noncommutative cyclic covers and maximal orders on surfaces. Adv Math,
2005, 198: 654-683
[9] Chan D, Ingalls C. The minimal model program for orders over surfaces. Invent Math,
2005, 161: 427-452
[10] Chan D, Kulkarni R S. del Pezzo orders on projective surfaces. Adv Math, 2003, 173:
144-177
[11] Chan D, Kulkarni R S. Numerically Calabi-Yau orders on surfaces. J London Math
Soc, 2005, 72: 571-584
[12] Keeler D S, Rogalski D and Stafford J T. Nave noncommutative blowing up. Duke
Math J, 2005, 126: 491-546
[13] Rogalski D. Generic noncommutative surfaces. Adv Math, 2004, 184: 289-341
[14] Rogalski D, Stafford J T. Nave noncommutative blowups at zero-dimensional schemes.
J Algebra, 2007, 318: 794-833
1
2
59
xi = y i ,
i = 1, 2, , m;
X X + = X \{1} P X ,
x, y P, z X ,
y = xz z = 1.
, . X x X a, x/a
a x . X x, y , x y,
a X,
x/a = y/a;
X A, B , A B, : A B
x A,
x (x).
1 ()[2] .
1[4] .
, , , [3]
.
10000
60
, 1 , 1 ,
, , 1 , 1
.
2[5] :
(i) ;
(ii) ;
(iii) n X C K1 (C), , Kn (C)
n
X
i=1
,Ki (C) C X i . , C:
x C, a X,
x/a 6 1.
, 1, [6]
, .
2 ()[6]
.
2,
2, 2 ?
[1] Schutzenberger M P. Une theorie algebrique du codage. Seminaire Dubreil-Pisot 195556, expose No. 15, 1955
[2] Perrrin D, Schutzenberger M P. Un probleme elementaire de la theorie de linformation.
Colloques internet, CNRS 276, Cachan, 1977, 249-260
[3] Brzozowski J A. Open problems about reguler languages presented at the International
Symposium. Santa Barbara, 1979, 10-14
[4] Shor P. A counterexample to the triangle conjecture. J Combin Theor Ser A, 1983, 38:
110-112
[5] , , . . , A , 1987, 2:
143-148
[6] Bruyere V, Latteux M. Variable-Length Maximal Codes. Automata, Languages and
Programming (paderborn, 1996). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1996, 24-47
61
(xR(T )y GT (x, y) = S 1 ),
,
FT (x, y) = {(u, v) S 1 S 1 |uxv T uyv T }
(GT (x, y) = {u S 1 |xu T yu T }).
T , R(T ) S . S 1 L S 1
(), ()
(i), S 1 L,
(i0 ), S 1 L,
(ii), A, B L A B L,
(ii0 ), A, B L A B L,
(iii), A L, A B B L,
(iii0 ), A L, z S 1 Dz A L.
(iv), A L, z S 1 Dz A L.
, Dz A = {x S 1 |zx A}, A B A B ,
A B = [(A B c ) (Ac B)]c .
, .
1[1] S , T S, L S 1 . R(T, L)
S x, y S,
xR(T, L)y GT (x, y) L.
10000
62
(1) R(T, L) S
(2) {S 1 } , R(T ) = R(T, {S 1 }). ,
L, R(T, L) R(T )
(3) CS 1 = {A S 1 |Ac } S 1 , .
, CS 1 = {A S 1 |Ac }. , S 0
, A = S 1 \{0} , D0 A = {x S 1 |0x A} ,
.
1 S . S 1 () LDFS 1
(LDSFS 1 ), L LDSFS 1 , RL = {T S 1 |R(T, L) }.
1[1] X , X X ( X
X ), CX LDFX . R{X } = RCX ? ().
1 1, ( [2])
Schreier .
1[3]
R{X } = RCX .
1 CX
. .
2
,
3
S 1, 2, 3 .
.
, . S 1 S 1 (
), i, ii, iii, iv1 , iv2 [i0 , ii0 , iv1 , iv2 ] S 1 S 1 ,
(iv1 ) A L, z S 1 Dz A L,
(iv2 ) A L, z S 1 z DA L,
5 ()
1, 2, 3 .
63
[1] Prodinger H. Congruences defined by language and filters. Inform Contr, 1980, 1(44):
36-46
[2] Hall M Jr. The Theory of Groups. New York: Macmillian, 1959
[3] , , . Prodinger Schreier . , 1983, 26(3):
332-340
[4] Lallement G. Semigroup and Combinatorical Applications. New York: John Wiley, 1979
10000
64
xi = yi ,
i = 1, 2, m;
X X + = X \{1} P X ,
x, y P,
z X ,
y = xz z = 1.
, , . X x
X a, x/a a x . X x, y
, x y,
a X, x/a = y/a.
X A, B , A B, : A B
x A,
x (x).
X C ,
w X ,
X wX C 6= .
X C , . X
L , X L x, y X ,
x L y
u, v X , uxv L uyv L.
65
, .
, , .
[1] (, ) .
[3,4]
(1) () () ;
(2) {a, b} {aa, ba} ;
(3) {a, b} {aaaaa, aab, ba, b} .
{a, b}
[3,5]
C = b{1, a, a7 , a13 , a14 } {a3 , a8 }b{1, a2 , a4 , a6 } a11 b{1, a, a2 }.
1[3] C ( 1, ) ?
,
1 ,
.
2[3] ?
[1] Schutzenberger M P. Une theorie algebrique du codage, Seminaire Dubreil-Pisot 195556. expose No. 15 (1955)
[2] Perrrin D, Schutzenberger M P. Un probleme elementaire de la theorie de linformation.
Colloques internet. CNRS 276, Cachan 1977, 249-260
[3] Bruyere V, Latteux M. Variable-Length Maximal Codes. Automata, Languages and
Programming (paderborn, 1996). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1996, 24-47
[4] Restivo A. On codes having no finite completions. Discrete Math, 1977, 17: 309-316
[5] Shor P. A counterexample to the triangle conjecture. J Combin Theor Ser A, 1983, 38:
110-112
10000
66
ef = f e;
e, f, g E(S),
ef ege = ef ge;
e, f, g E(S),
ef ge = egf e;
e E(S),
eE(S)e .
, E(S) , ; S
f , e, ef = f e = e e = f.
, , ;
S , e, eSe ; S E-
,
e E(S),
a S,
e 6 a a E(S).
, 6 S , a, b S,
a 6 b e, f E(S),
a = eb = bf.
(e) = (f ) e = f.
67
1[1,2] E-
.
1[2] E- r-
2[25]
.
2[2] 2 .
[1] Billhardt B, Hsieh S C. Weakly E-Unitary locally inverse semigroups. preprint
[2] M B Szendrei. Some open problems in the structure theory of regular semigroups.
Semigroup Forum, 2002, 64: 213-223
[3] McAlister D B. Groups, semilattice and inverse semigroups. Trans Amer Math Soc,
1974, 192: 227-244
[4] Lawson M V. Almost factorisable inverse semigroups. Glasgow Math J, 1994, 36: 97-111
[5] Lawson M V. Inverse Semigroups: The Theory of Partial Symmetries. Singapore: World
Scientific, 1998
10000
68
(cluster) . , Happel
Artin ; Rickard
Morita . , [8].
A . A- T (generalized tilting
module)[9] , (i) proj.dimA T = r, r < ; (ii) ExtiA (T, T ) = 0, i > 0; (iii)
0 AA T0 T1 Tm 0, Ti add(T ), add(T )
T . . M
(i) (ii), M (partial tilting module).
r = m = 1, T M .
[4] .
(M ) A- M . n =
(A), n A- . , T (T ) = n;
M (M ) 6 n. (M ) = n 1 M
(almost complete tilting module). M ,
add(X) add(M ) = 0 A- X, M X , X M
. .
1
2
.
M (M ) = n, M .
, 1 .
; , [10] . ,
, [10] . 1 ,
1 . [1] M
M , M ; [6]
; M , M M .
[2]
, [5] M
69
2; M M .
2 . [3] C = {X modA | ExtiA (X, M ) =
0 i > 0, proj.dimA X < } , 2 ;
(Finitistic dimension conjecture) , 2 . [7] ,
2 Nakayama (Generalized Nakayama Conjecture)
A- A .
, ,
. ,
,
.
[1] Auslander M, Reiten I. Applications to contravariantly finite subcategories. Adv Math,
1991, 86: 111-152
[2] Bongartz K. Tilted Algebras. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1981, 26-38
[3] Coelho F, Happel D and Unger L. Complements to partial tilting modules. J Algebra,
1994, 170: 184-205
[4] Happel D, Ringel C M. Tilted algebras. Trans Amer Math Soc, 1982, 274: 399-443
[5] Happel D, Unger L. Almost complete tilting modules. Proc Amer Math Soc, 1989,
107: 603-610
[6] Happel D, Unger L. Partial tilting modules and covariantly finite subcategories. Comm
Algebra, 1994, 22(5): 1723-1727
[7] Happel D, Unger L. Complements and the generalized Nakayama conjecture. Algebras
and modules II (Geiranger, 1996), 293-310, CMS Conf Proc, 24, Amer Math Soc,
Providence, RI, 1998
[8] L Angeleri H
ugel, D Happel and H Krause. Handbook of tilting theory. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2007
[9] Miyashita Y. Tilting modules of finite projective dimension. Math Z, 1986, 193: 113146
[10] Rickard J, Schofield A. Cocovers and tilting modules. Math Proc Cambridge Philos
Soc, 1989, 106: 1-5
1
2
10000
70
: [4] . W Weyl , W
() Verma
( Kazhdan-Lusztig ); W Weyl ,
W Weyl
( Lusztig ). ,
W , ,
.
W ( AB C D ) Weyl , Barbasch, Vogan, Garfinkle
[2,3]
W . Joseph Weyl W
. Barbasch Vogan[2]
W . W
. ,
. Lusztig : Weyl .
Weyl Wa () .
Weyl Wa (Aen1 ) n tabloid
[9] ; Lusztig Wa (Aen1 ) n
e C
e D
e )
[5,9] . : ( B
Weyl ? .
Lusztig : Weyl Wa
G [7] . G
, Wa ( Wa a, ).
(: ).
Lusztig : Weyl Wa [6] . Wa
n() ,
() [1] . ,
, , .
, n() Weyl , .
71
Lusztig : Weyl Wa (
d())[6] . Wa ,
, .
d() [10] , ,
.
Wa (alcove) . Wa K
, K K
. Lusztig : Weyl [1] .
. ( Wa (Aen1 )) [9] ,
.
, ,
. Bedard 3 ,
. , LusztigBremke [8] .
, , .
[1] Asai T et al. Open problems in algebraic groups. Proc Twelfth Intern Symp, Toh
oku
Univ, Japan, 1983, 14
[2] Barbasch D, Vogan D. Primitive ideals and Orbital integrals in complex classical
groups. Math Ann, 1982, 259: 153-199
[3] Garfinkle D. On the classification of primitive ideals for complex classical Lie algebra.
I Compo Math, 1990, 75: 135-169
[4] Kazhdan D, Lusztig G. Representations of Coxeter groups and Hecke algebras. Invent
Math, 1979, 53: 165-184
en // Kac V ed. Infinite
[5] Lusztig G. The two-sided cells of the affine Weyl group of type A
Dimensional Groups with Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1985, 275-283
[6] Lusztig G. Cells in affine Weyl groups. II, J Algebra, 1987, 109: 536-548
[7] Lusztig G. Cells in affine Weyl groups. IV, J Fac Sci Univ Tokyo Sect IA Math, 1989,
36: 297-328
[8] Lusztig G. Hecke algebras with unequal parameters. CRM Monograph Series vol 18,
Amer Math Soc, 2003
[9] Shi J Y. The Kazhdan-Lusztig Cells in Certain Affine Weyl Groups. Berlin: SpringerVerlag, 1986
[10] Shi J Y. A survey on the cell theory of affine Weyl groups. Adv in Science of China,
Math, 1990, 3: 79-98
72
10000
Fitting
Is The Fitting Subgroup of A Soluble Group with Minimal
Condition on Normal Subgroups Nilpotent?
, Fitting
, Fitting G G
Fitting , FitG. FitG , .
p, , T r1(nA#, p) p 1 n
, n 1 p .
T r1(n, p) G, G Fitting FitG G, G .
, Fitting , ,
, , [1][2]. G, FitG
G , FitG G
. Bender Fitting G
, G
Fitting . , [3].
, , ,
.
, Cernikov ,
Cernikov Abel ,
Fitting
73
. , ,
, Fitting
. , .
[1] Huppert B. Endliche Gruppen I. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1967
[2] Doerk K, Hawkes T. Finite Soluble Groups. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1992
[3] Gorenstein D. Finite Simple Groups. New York: Plenum Press, 1982
[4] Olsanskii A Yu. An infinite group with subgroups of prime orders. Izv Akad Nauk
SSSR Ser Mat, 1980, 44: 309-321
[5] Robinson D J S. The Theory of Infinite Soluble Groups. Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 2004
[6] Baer R. Irreducible groups of automorphisms of abelian groups. Pacific J Math, 1964,
14: 385-406
10000
74
smash
Primeness of Smash Product of Module Algebras
, ().
Hopf
. Hopf ,
. Hopf
. Hopf
, smash . Smash .
1978 , Fisher Montgomery[1] : G |G|
R , RG . , .
, Montgomery[2] 1992
smash H Hopf , A
H- . smash A#H
. .
H , Montgomery Schneider[3] : H
(semisolvable), ; A H , Lomp[4] : A
H , ; H A , Chin[5]
H , .
[1] Fisher J W, Montgomery S. Semiprime skew group rings. J Algebra, 1978, 52: 241-247
[2] Montgomery S. Hopf Algebras and Their Actions on Rings. American Mathematical
Society, Providence, RI, 1993
[3] Montgomery S, Schneider H J. Prime ideals in Hopf Galois extensions. Israel J Math,
1999, 112: 187-235
[4] Lomp C. When is a smash product semiprime? A partial answer, J Algebra, 2004, 275:
339-355
smash
75
[5] Chin W. Crossed products and generalized inner actions of Hopf algebras. Pacific J
Math, 1991, 150: 241-259
10000
76
Pieri
Pieri-type Raising Operator Formula for Zonal
Symmetric Functions
20 50 , ,
. V (2) Un ,
A , (zonal spherical polynomial) Z (t1 , , tn ).
, A. T. James S2n {1}n Sn ,
Z . Jack Jack J (t1 , , tn ; ) =
t1 1 t22 tnn + ( [1]),
X
J = J1 J2 Jl +
c J1 J2 Jl
(1)
1 qm
mn
1 tm
, Macdonald P (q, t). Macdonald
. hpm , pn i = m
.
, Macdonald , [3]
. (1) .
, P (q, t) 4 3 ( [4]).
,
. q = 0 , ( [5]).
Macdonald P (q, t) .
Pieri
77
[1] Jack H. A class of symmetric polynomials with a parameter. Proc Roy Soc Edin Sec
Ser A: Math Phys Sci, 1969-70, 69: 1-18
[2] Macdonald I G. Symmetric functions and Hall polynomials. 2nd ed., Oxford: Claredon,
1995
[3] Haglund J, Haiman M and Loehr N. A combinatorial formula for Macdonald polynomials. J Amer Soc, 2005, 18: 735-761
[4] Jing N. q-hypogeometric series and Macdonald symmetric functions. J Alg Combin,
1994, 3: 291-305
[5] Jing N. Vertex operators and Hall-Littlewood symmetric functions. Adv Math, 1990,
87: 226-248
10000
78
. 1995 [1] 5 ,
.
, J.Green ,
. . Auslander Reiten[2]
: , ,
, .
: () ,
. rad2 () = 0, ,
.
1977 , Reiten[3] Brauer
. , ,
. 1978 Reiten[4] Nakayama ,
.
Bretscher, Laser Riedtmann[5] :
, .
79
, Martinez-Villa . [6]
l- ,
, ; [7] : , ;
[8] : .
Tang[9] . ,
,
AR- , .
Broue Morita , Morita . A
B Morita , A-B- M B-A- N ,
A-A- P B-B- Q, A-A- , M B N ' A P ,
80
10000
Gr
obnerShirshov
81
Gr
obnerShirshov
GrobnerShirshov Bases for Some Algebras
Grobner-Shirshov
.
Drinfeld 1985
. Jimbo 1985 . Hopf ,
Hopf ,
. .
g k , g Cartan A = (a )
, , a = 2(, )/(, ), , , (, ) g Killing , g
Cartan . g g = Lie(x , y , h , |R),
R = {[h , h ] = 0, [x , y ] = h , [h , x ] = a x , [h , y ] = a y (,
); (adx )1a x = 0, (ady )1a y = 0 ( 6= , , )}, R Serre
( [3]).
g Uq (g)() k ,
(, )
{1, 2, 3}.
g Serre , q k q := q d 6= 1, d =
2
DrinfeldJimbo Uq (g) : Uq (g) = khE , F , K , K1 , | R1 i,
R1 = {K K1 = K1 K = 1, K K = K K , K E K1 = q a E , K F K1 =
!
1 1a
X
1
a
K
1a
q a F , E F F E =
,
(1)
E
q q 1
=0
q
!
1a
X
1 a
1a
E E = 0,
(1)
F F F = 0, , }, ,
=0
q
!
m
Kronecker , m > n > 0 q,
Z[q, q 1 ]
n
q
:
m
n
!
q
n mi+1
Yq
q m+i1
,
q i q i
=
i=1
0,
m > n > 0,
n = 0 m = n.
10000
82
Cartan An ( [3]). L , X
, L U (L ) Poincare-Birkhoff-Witt( PBW)
xi1 xi2 xin , xij X, i1 6 i2 6 6 in .
G. Lusztig[7] M. Kashiwara[5] g, Uq (g)
Poincare-Birkhoff-Witt .
, Cartan . Hopf
, V. K. Kharchenko 1999 Uq (g) ,
. 1996 , BokutMalcolmson Uq (An ) Grobner
Shirshov , , , , (arXiv.org/abs/0804.0954)
.
1 Uq (g) GrobnerShirshov , g Cartan
Bn , Dn , G2 , F4 , E6 , E7 , E8 ( [3]) .
Yang-Baxter , Sklyanin[10]
( [8]). C F =
Chx0 , x1 , x2 | R2 i, R2 = {x0 x1 qx1 x0 = px22 , x1 x2 qx2 x1 = px20 , x2 x0
qx0 x2 = px21 }, p, q C. F - , F
l
xn0 xm
1 x2 , n, m, l . ,
GrobnerShirshov .
C Qn,m (E, ), n > 3
, m n , 1 6 m < n. X = {xi ; i Zn }, Qn,m (E, ) =
X ji+r(m1) (0)
xjr xi+r = 0, i, j Zn i, E ,
ChX |
mr ()jir ()
rZ
n
C[X] , .
2
k , k. RotaBaxter R k
RotaBaxter P : R R : P (x)P (y) = P (P (x)y) +
P (xP (y)) + P (xy), x, y R. 20 80 , Belavin, Drinfeld SemenovTian-Shansky RotaBaxter . RotaBaxter
operad .
Rota[9] Cartier RotaBaxter ,
Ebrahimi-FardGuo[1] . RotaBaxter -
, - . DrenskyHoltkamp
- GrobnerShirshov , Bokut
Gr
obnerShirshov
83
84
10000
[10] Sklyanin E K. Some algebraic structures connected with the Yang-Baxter equation.
Funktsional Anal i Prilozhen, 1982, 16: 27-34; English transl in Funct Anal Appl, 1983,
16: 263-270
L. Bokut
85
{Ei , Fi : i I} {K : Z[I]} :
K0 = 1, K K = K+ , , Z[I];
K Ei = v (,i) Ei K , K Fi = v (,i) Fi K , i I, Z[I];
Ki Ki
, i, j I, vi = v (i,i)/2 ;
vi vi1
"
#
1cij
X
1 cij
1c t
t
(1)
Eit Ej Ei ij = 0;
t
t=0
Ei Fj Fj Ei = ij
"
1cij
X
t=0
(1)t
1 cij
t
#
1cij t
Fit Fj Fi
= 0.
Hopf , (
). [1] [3].
, Lusztig[5] Kashiwara[4]
20 . Lusztig quiver
Hall [8] . , Nakajima[6] quiver variety
. ,
10000
86
U + U , .
U = U U 0 U + () (
) .
. [7], [9] [10] .
Grothendieck Verdier
. (
). (
[2] ) . , Beilinson
. quiver ,
Grothendieck Kac-Moody
(). ,
. ,
.
[1] Drinfeld V G. Hopf algebras and the quantum Yang-Baxter equation. Soviet Math Dokl,
1985, 32: 254-258
[2] Happel D. On the derived category of a finite dimensional algebra. Comment Math
Helv, 1987, 62: 339-389
[3] Jimbo M. A q-difference analogue of U (g) and the Yang-Baxter equation. Lett Math
Phys, 1985, 10: 63-69
[4] Kashiwara M. On crystal bases of the q-analogue of universal enveloping algebras. Duke
Math J, 1991, 63: 465-516
[5] Lusztig G. Canonical bases arising from quantized enveloping algebras. J Amer Math
Soc, 1990, 3: 447-498
[6] Nakajima H. Quiver varieties and Kac-Moody algebras. Duke Math J, 1998, 91: 515-560
[7] Peng L, Xiao J. Triangulated categories and Kac-Moody algebras. Invent Math, 2000,
140: 563-603
[8] Ringel C. Hall algebras and quantum groups. Invent Math, 1990, 101: 583-592
[9] Toen B. Derived Hall algebras. Duke Math J, 2006, 135: 587-615
[10] Xiao J, Xu F. Hall algebras associated to triangulated categories. Duke Math J 2008,
143: 357-373
87
10000
88
. ,
[9] . Erdmann, Holm, Iyama Schroer
J() = J(), fin.dim < . ,
(special biserial) (string) [4] .
, ,
.
[1] Agoston
I, Happel D, Luk
acs E and Unger L. Finitistic dimension of standardly stratified algebras. Comm Algebra, 2000, 28: 2745-2752
[2] Auslander M, Reiten I. Applications of contravariantly finite subcategories. Adv Math,
1991, 86: 111-152
[3] Bass H. Finitistic dimension and a homological generalization of semiprimary rings.
Trans Amer Math Soc, 1960, 95: 466-488
[4] Erdmann K, Holm T, Iyama O and Schr
oer J. Radical embedding and representation
dimension. Adv Math, 2004, 185: 159-177
[5] Green E L, Kirkman E and Kuzmanovich J. Finitistic dimensions of finite-dimensional
monomial algebras. J Algebra, 1991, 136: 37-50
[6] Green E L, Zimmermann-Huisgen B. Finitistic dimension of artin rings with vanishing radical cube. Math Z, 1991, 206: 505-526
[7] Mochizuki H Y. Finitistic global dimension for rings. Pacific J Math, 1965, 15: 249-258
[8] Wang Y. A note on the finitistic dimension conjecture. Comm Algebra, 1994, 22:
2525-2528
[9] Xi C C. Representation dimension and quasi-hereditary algebras. Adv Math, 2002,
168: 193-212
[10] Zimmermann-Huisgen B. The finitistic dimension conjecturesa tale of 3.5 decades //
Abelian gropus and modules (Padova, 1994). Math Appl 343, Kluwer Acad Publ, 1995,
501-517
ABC
89
ABC
ABC Conjecture
ABC (D. Goldfeld) ,
, a + b = c, gcd(a, b) = 1 a, b, c
c abc .
ABC , .
n, n , rad(n)
n . n = 216 , rad(n) = 2; n =
28 35 1111 17, rad(n) = 2 3 11 17 = 1122.
ABC (Joseph Oesterle David Masser, 1985) > 0,
C() a + b = c, gcd(a, b) = 1 a, b, c,
c 6 C()(rad(abc))1+ .
Oesterle 1985 Szpiro(1981)
. ABC ,
a + b = c, gcd(a, b) = 1, max(|a|, |b|, |c|) 6 (rad(abc))2 . Fermat
xn + y n = z n n > 6 , Wiles(1995) Fermat
. ( [1]). ,
ABC ABC ,
Roth(1955) (1958 Fields ) Baker(1966) (1970
Fields ), ABC ,
[1] [2]. , ABC
. , , Moret Bailey Szpiro ,
y 2 = x5 x (
) ABC .
10000
90
ABC , Baker ,
ABC , C.L.Stewart (1996) Baker
c < exp{C(rad(abc))1/3+ }. , K. Gyory (2007)
S- , ABC
. , a + b = c, gcd(a, b) = 1 a, b, c,
L = L(a, b, c) =
(Bass) (Soule)
91
(Bass) (Soule)
Bass Conjecture and Soule Conjecture
, 20 90 , Wiles
, .
Quillen K- , ,
, K- . X
, Quillen K- Ki (X) Ki0 (X), H.
Bass
(a) X SpecZ (Z ) , Ki0 (X)
;
(b) X SpecZ , Ki (X) .
Quillen dim X 6 1 , Bass . Bass ,
Beilinson-Soule ( X , H 1 (X, Z(n)) = 0, n > 0, i < 0) .
, E , spl(E) E p
p , K2 (E) Beilinson-Bloch
rank(K2 (E)) = 1 + spl(E).
92
10000
Current problems in mathematics, Vol. 24, Itogi Naukii Tekhniki, 181-238. Akad. Nauk
SSSR Vsesoyuz Inst Nauchn I Tekhn Inform, Moscow, 1984
[2] Spencer Bloch. Algebraic cycles and values of L-functions. J Reine Angew Math, 1984,
350: 94-108
[3] Kahn B. Algebraic K-theory, Algebraic Cycles and Arithmetic Geometry.
Berlin:
Lichtenbaum
93
Lichtenbaum
Lichtenbaum Conjecture
Lichtenbaum K- .
F - 1 ,
F . K0 , 0, 1, 2, 3, K- .
K n > 2, K 1 n
|K2n2 (OF )|
RnB (F )
|K2n1 (OF )tors |
2 .
Lichtenbaum Motivic
Lichtenbaum Motivic K n > 2, K
1 n
2
|HM
(F, Z(n))|
RnM (F ), RnM (F ) Borel Regulator.
1
|HM (F, Z(n))tors |
Lichtenbaum .
, Lichtenbaum .
[1] Kahn B. Algebraic K-theory, Algebraic Cycles and Arithmetic Geometry. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2005, 351-428
[2] Stephen Lichtenbaum. Values of zeta-functions, etale cohomology, and algebraic Ktheory // Algebraic K-theory, II: Classical algebraic K-theory and connections with
94
10000
arithmetic (Pro Conf, Battelle Memorial Inst, Seattle, Wash, 1972). Berlin: SpringerVerlag, 1973, 489-501
[3] Tate J. Symbols in arithmetic. Actes du Congr`es International des Mathematiciens
(Nice, 1970), Tome 1, 201-211. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1971
[4] Wiles A. The Iwasawa Conjecture for totally real fields. Annals of Math, 1990, 131:
493-540
(Reed-Solomon)
95
-- (Reed-Solomon)
The Decoding Problem for Reed-Solomon Codes
Fq q . Fq D = {x1 , , xn } Fq ,
. k n, 1 6 k 6 n 6 q, Fqn
Cq (D, k) = {(f (x1 ), , f (xn )) Fnq |f (x) Fq [x], degf (x) 6 k 1}
Fq n, k Reed-Solomon .
Cq (D, k) . D = Fq Fq .
, Cq (Fq , k) Reed-Solomon , RSq [q, k].
Fnq u = (u1 , , un ) v = (v1 , , vn ),
(Hamming)
d(u, v) = #{1 6 i 6 n|ui 6= vi }.
Fq n C u Fnq , u C
d(u, C) = min d(u, v).
vC
d(u, C) = 0 u . C u C
06=vC
10000
96
q qk , MLD
? , Guruswami-Sudan q qk ?
. , . , Cheng-Wan[3,4]
, RSq [q, k] MLD
Fqh , h 6 q 1/4 . ,
, .
.
MLD ? RSq [q, k],
MLD NP- . MLD
.
2 d(u, RSq [q, k])?
d(u, RSq [q, k]) ?
, . , d(u, RSq [q, k])
. , Riemann
d(u, RSq [q, k]) , [2] [6].
Reed-Solomon , .
, .
.
[1] Berlekamp E R. Algebraic Coding Theory. McGraw-Hill Book Co, 1968
[2] Cheng Q, Murray E. On deciding deep holes of Reed-Solomon codes. TAMC, Lecture
Notes in Computer Sciences, Vol 4484, 2007, 296-305
[3] Cheng Q, Wan D. On the list and bounded distance decodibility of Reed-Solomon codes.
SIAM J Comput, 2007, 37(1): 195-209
[4] Cheng Q, Wan D. Complexity of decoding positive rate Reed-Solomon codes. 35th
International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming(ICALP08), to
(Reed-Solomon)
97
appear
[5] Stichtenoth H. Algebraic Function Fields and Codes. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1993
[6] Li Y-J, Wan D. On error distance of Reed-Solomon codes, Sciences Sinica, to appear
[7] Guruswami V, Sudan M. Improved decoding of Reed-Solomon and algebraic geometry
codes. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1999, 45(6): 1757-1767
[8] Guruswami V, Vardy A. Maximum-likelihood decoding of Reed-Solomon codes is NPhard. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2005, 51(7): 2249-2256
[9] Sudan M. Decoding of Reed-Solomon codes beyond the error correction bound. J Complexity, 1997, 13: 180-193
Irvine
10000
98
(Schanuel)
Schanuels Conjecture
Schanuel ,
() .
,
. ,
. ,
Liouville 1844 . Hermite
1873 e Lindemman 1882 ,
. Hilbert 23 7
,
0, 1 , ?
, 2 2 , e = (1)i ? Hilbert ,
, .
Gelfond Schneider 1934 .
Q , , .
Gelfond-Schneider x1 , x2 log x1 , log x2
Q , log x1 , log x2 Q . Gelfond
. Baker 1966 ,
x1 , , xn log x1 , , log xn Q ,
1, log x1 , , log xn Q .
,
x1 , , xn log x1 , , log xn
Q , log x1 , , log xn .
, y1 , , yn ,
n P , P (y1 , , yn ) 6= 0. Baker
n = 1 , Hermite-Lindemann . n > 2 ,
x1 , x2 log x1 , log x2 !
(Schanuel)
99
, Hermite-Lindemann
, , e . Cartier , Lang 20
60 . Cartier Hermite-Lindemann
. Lang
Cartier , , .
x1 , , xd Q , y1 , , yl Q
, dl > d + l , exi yj (1 6 i 6 d, 1 6 j 6 l) dl .
1966 Lang Ramachandra . ,
d > l, dl > d + l d > 3, l > 2. d = 3, l = 2
. , . dl = 6,
. ,
x1 , , xd Q , y1 , , yl Q
, dl > d + l , exi yj (1 6 i 6 d, 1 6 j 6 l) dl
.
, d = l = 2 . ,
, .
20 , .
,
x1 , , xn Q , x1 , , xn , ex1 , ,
2n n .
Schanuel
exn
x1 , , xn , Schanuel Lindemann-Weierstrass
. ex1 , , exn
. Schanuel , ,
. ,
, . Schanuel . ,
x1 = 1, x2 = 2i Schanuel , e, . , e,
.
[1] Baker A. Transcendental Number Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1975
[2] Lang S. Introduction to Transcendental Numbers. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co, 1966
[3] Liouville J. Sur des classes tr`es etendues de quantites dont la valeur nest ni rationnelle
ni meme reductible `
a des irrationnelles algebriques. C R, 1844, 18: 883-885, 910-911
100
10000
Berlin:
Springer-Verlag, 2000
[5] Waldschmidt M. Un demi-si`ecle de transcendance. Development of mathematics, 19502000, 1121-1186, Birkh
auser, Basel, 2000
(Goldbach)
101
(Goldbach)
Goldbach Conjecture
, 1742
. ,
,
I. 9
II. 6 .
II , 3 , I
. , II . ,
, . ,
, ,
.
, ,
. ,
, .
1900 , 20 ,
23 . ,
8 , ,
. , .
1920 , Hardy Littlewood I,
Ramanujan . ,
I Fourier ,
1 , . Hardy Littlewood
I, ,
. , ,
, ,
.
1937 , Vinogradov
. Fourier ,
, .
102
10000
, I .
Vinogradov , ,
, , ,
.
II. I , ,
, ,
. II I , .
II , 200
Eratosthenes , .
, II , .
, , II,
. 1920 , Brun ,
, 9,
(9+9). Brun II ,
, .
II ,
. (1+2),
, (1+2) Vinogradov
. Bombieri
(1+3), ,
.
, (1+2) II , ,
. , II . ,
Vinogradov ,
II . , II
. , ,
.
, . ,
p, p + 2 ?
. , II , (1+2)
p, p + 2 2.
x, x2 + 1 ,
, x2 + 1 p + 2 , , x2 + 1 .
, x, x2 + 1 2.
,
(Goldbach)
103
, ,
.
[1] , . . : , 1981
[2] , . . : , 1997
10000
104
(Erd
os)
Erdos Problem on Covering Systems with Distinct Moduli
A , A () (
). Paul Erdos
c > 0 {a1 (mod n1 ), , ak (mod nk )} (n1 < < nk )
n1 c? Erdos (This
is my favorite problem of all.).
Erdos 20 30 , .
,
Z. A
NP P (L. J. Stockmeyer A. R.
Meyer, 1973). ,
.
Erdos
{0(mod 2), 0(mod 3), 1(mod 4), 3(mod 8), 7(mod 12), 23(mod 24)}
, 2n + p , n
, p . Erdos ,
r = 1, 2, 3, 2n + r ,
r r . ,
n1 = 40 (P. Nielsen, 2008).
Erdos-Selfridge 1 .
A 1/n1 + + 1/nk 1, A
1. Erdos A {0(1)} A
. 20 60 H. Davenport, L. Mirsky, D. Newman R. Rado
.
(Erd
os)
105
, Erdos ,
{0(1)}. Erdos
M >1, M 1986 R. J.
Simpson N. Burshtein , .
{a1 (mod n1 ), , ak (mod nk )} (1 < n1 < < nk ), Erdos
J. L. Selfridge n1 1/n1 + + 1/nk
, 2007 M. Filaseta, K. Ford, S. Konyagin, C. Pomerance G. Yu
, 2008 S. Kim
.
() . Fibonacci
, R. L. Graham 1964
a b
w0 = a,
w1 = b,
wn+1 = wn + wn1
(n = 1, 2, 3, )
w0 , w1 , w2 , ; 80
a M x a (mod M ) x2 F3n /2 .
Selfridge 78557 2n + 1 , 78557
k k2n + 1 . 1975 F. Cohen Selfridge
2a pb ( p , a b ) 94 , 2000
pa q b ( p q , a b ); 2008
T. Tao Selberg a > 1,
a (a = 2
Cohen-Selfridge ).
a(mod n) Z n nZ a+nZ,
.
Neumann-Tomkinson G a1 G1 , ,
ak Gk ( a1 , , ak G , G1 , , Gk G ) G (
), n1 =[G:G1 ], , nk =[G:Gk ] . 1974 Herzog
Schonheim G a1 G1 , , ak Gk (k > 1)
G , n1 =[G:G1 ], , nk =[G:Gk ] . M.
A. Berger, A. Felzenbaum A. S. Fraenkel G
; G1 , , Gk G ,
10000
106
n1 =[G:G1 ], , nk =[G:Gk ] M
O . G
a1 G1 , , ak Gk [G:G1 ], , [G:Gk ] ,
1 6 i < j 6 k [G:Gi ] [G:Gj ] k.
[1] Berger M A, Felzenbaum A, Fraenkel A S. Ther Herzog-Sch
onheim conjecture for finite
nilpotent groups. Canad Math Bull, 1986, 29: 329-333
[2] . On integers of the form kr -2n and kr 2n +1. J Number Theory, 2003, 98:
310-319
[3] Filaseta M, Ford K, Konyagin S, Pomerance C, Yu G. Sieving by large integers and
covering systems of congruences. J Amer Math Soc, 2007, 27: 495-517
[4] , . On odd covering systems with distinct moduli. Adv in Math, 2005, 35:
182-187
[5] Guy R K. Unsolved Problems in Number Theory. 3rd Edition. New York: SpringerVerlag, 2004, Sections A19, B21, F13, F14
[6] Kim S. Covering systems in number fields.
http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2008.05.013
[7] . On integers not of the form pa qb . Proc Amer Math Soc, 2000, 128: 9971002
[8] . On the Herzog-Sch
onheim conjecture for uniform covers of groups. J Algebra,
2004, 273: 153-175
[9] Tao T. A remark on primality testing and decimal expansions. J Aust Math Soc, 2008,
to appear. http://arxiv.org/abs/0802.3361
[10] . On Suns conjecture concerning disjoint cosets. Int J Mod Math, 2008, 3:
197-206
(Erd
os-Tur
an)
107
--
(Erd
os-Tur
an)
Erdos-Turan Conjecture on Sequence with The
Sum of Reciprocals Divergent
1936 Erdos Tur
an a1 < a2 < a3 <
X
1/ai , (
i>1
). , Erdos-Turan
.
1927 , van der Waerden
n rk (n)/n 0.
Erdos-Turan , A
X
1/a .
aA
, Szemeredi Erdos-Turan ,
Szemeredi . Szemeredi , Szemeredi
. Szemeredi . 1970 ,
Furstenberg , Szemeredi .
Szemeredi . ,
rk (n)/n 0, rk (n) . Szemeredi
rk (n) , . 1998 , Gowers
Roth , Freiman Balog-Szemeredi
, Szemeredi rk (n) . Gowers
10000
108
(Abel) Snevily
109
(Abel) Snevily
Snevilys Conjecture on Abelian Groups of Odd Orde
1999 H. S. Snevily ()Abel G k
. , Alon p , A = {a1 , , ak }
Zp k , b1 , , bk Zp , k < p, {1, , k}
a1 + b(1) , , ak + b(k) . 2001 Dasgupta, Karolyi, Serra Szegedy
Snevily Alon
Abel , DKSS : G Abel
|G| > 1 , G k A = {a1 , , ak }( k |G|
p(G)) G () b1 , , bk , {1, , k} a1 b(1) , ,
10000
110
, Snevily .
.
, Snevily a1 , , ak
k < n, {1, , k} a1 + (1), , ak + (k) n .
2002 Kezdy Snevily k 6 (n + 1)/2 ,
.
[1] Alon N. Combinatorial Nullstellensatz. Combin Probab Comput, 1999, 8: 7-29
[2] Alon N. Additive Latin transversals. Israel J Math, 2000, 117: 125-130
[3] Dasgupta S, Karolyi G, Serra O and Szegedy B. Transversals of additive Latin squares.
Israel J Math, 2001, 126: 17-28
[4] , , . Exterior algebras and two conjectures on finite abelian groups.
http://arxiv.org/abs/0808.2753
[5] , . Additive Latin transversals and group rings. Israel J Math, 2004, 140:
375-380
[6] Hall M Jr. A combinatorial problem on abelian groups. Proc Amer Math Soc, 1952, 3:
584-587
[7] Kezdy A E, Snevily H S. Distinct sums modulo n and tree embeddings. Combin Probab
Comput, 2002, 11: 35-42
(Abel) Snevily
111
[8] Snevily H S. The Cayley addition table of Zn. Amer Math Monthly, 1999, 106: 584-585
[9] . On Snevilys conjecture and restricted sumsets. J Combin Theory Ser A, 2003,
103: 291-304
[10] . An additive theorem and restricted sumsets. http://arxiv.org/abs/math.CO/
0610981
10000
112
Drinfeld-Vladt
The Drinfeld-Vladt Bound on Numbers of Points of
Algebraic Curves over Finite Fields
Fq q , q . Fq [x, y]
. Ihara 1981
), A(q) = q 1. q = p2n+1 , p ,
Drinfeld-Vladt
113
Gilbert-Varshamov , Fq C,
10000
114
(Langlands)
Langlands Program
Riemann(1859) Riemann
(s) =
X
1
,
s
n
n=1
Res > 1
, 1/2[39] . [45]
n Riemann ,
Riemann . Deligne[6] Weil Riemann
[21] .
Weil Deligne , Riemann
, . Weil Langlands Riemann
Artin L- Hecke L- , L
( [31][33]). L , Langlands HarishChandra(1923-1983) , Borel(1923-2003) Harish-Chandra
, [17] Whittaker [32] . Langlands
L , Eisenstein (1965).
L . Langlands L
, . ,
, L .
,
, .
Langlands GL2
[18] .
Artin , Artin
Galois GL2 .
Artin [2] Galois Artin L . Langlands
Artin L L . , [10]
L , Artin L .
(Langlands)
115
E Q , E Hasse-Weil L
L(s, E). Birch Swinnerton-Dyer E(Q) Mordell-Weil L(s, E)
s = 1 . Shimura-Taniyama-Weil L(s, E) L
(1950s). Taylor-Wiles[43] Breuil-Conrad-Diamond-Taylor[5]
. Taylor-Weil[43] Wiles[46] Fermat
.
Langlands L , L
GLn L , L
L . , L Q GLm
L . .
, X
, 1 (X) etale . Langlands 1 (X) n
` GLn . Langlands
GL2 Drinfeld[7] , Lafforgue[28] .
Langlands 1 (X) n ` Hecke
[29,35] .
F , v F Archimedes Archimedes , Fv F
. F FA = 0v Fv . G
, G(FA ) G(F). G Z.
..
. w F FA
G = GLn , Z =
.
z
, F , w Z(F)\Z(FA ) .
L2 (Z(FA )G(F)\G(FA ), w), f (g) =
f (g), G(F), g G(FA ) w f (zg) = w(z)f (g), z Z(FA ), g
G(FA )
Z
|f (g)|2 dg < .
Z(FA )G(F)\G(FA )
L2 (Z(FA )G(F)\G(FA ), w) N
Z
f (ng)dn = 0, g G(FA )
N (F)\N (FA )
10000
116
GLn1
P =
..
*
.
GLnr
In1
, N =
..
*
.
Inr
. L20 Eisenstein
.
= v v , v G(Fv )
, . v Weil Weil-Deligne
v Fv , Fur Fv , Gal(Fur /Fv )
. F
Gal(F
v /Fv )
v Fv . Z
p Zp = Z.
Gal(Fur /Fv ) F
Z
= Gal(Fur /Fv ) Frobenius Fr , Weil WFv Z
, Weil-Deligne WF0 v WF C . G
, G L L G[4] . L L G0 Galois
L G = L (G/F) = L G0 o F , F = Gal(F/F).
L (GLn /F) = GLn (C) o F .
Langlands G(Fv )
L , L WFv WF0 v L G
. GL2 Langlands Kutzko[27] . GLn Langlands
Harris-Taylor[13] Henniart[14] . ,
.
Langlands Langlands L L(s, v ),
L
L(s, ) = v L(s, v ), (s, ) = v L(s, v ).
Langlands[33] , L(s, ) (s, )
Res .
Godement-Jacquet[10] L LGJ GJ ,
Langlands . LGJ GJ .
Langlands GLn , L(s, )(s, ) .
Langlands Artin Langlands
Gal(F/F) Weil L G . G
(Langlands)
117
G = (L H 0 L H 0 ) o F .
|
{z
}
m
L : L H L G, (x, ) = (x, , x, ), x L H 0 , F , L H 0
. .
E F Galois , H = GL2 Saito[40] Langlands[30]
, H = GLn Arthur-Clozel[1] . E F , GLn
L s = 1 ,
. , Jacquet et.
al(1986-2005) . E/F , H GLn ,
.
, H = GL2 , G = GLm+1 , L H = GL2 (C) o F , L G = GLm+1 (C) o F .
Symm : GL2 (C) GLm+1 (C) GL2 (C) m , m
. L : L H L G, (x, ) = (Symm x, ) GL2
GLm+1 Symm , , Symm
, L(s, Symm ) .
Sym2 , Shimura[42] L(s, Sym2 ) . Gelbart-Jacquet[9]
10000
118
Sym2 Sym2 .
Sym3 , Kim-Shahidi[25] . Sym4
Kim[22] , Kim-Shahidi[24] .
Sym4 , Kim-Sarnak[23] GL2 (QA ) ,
p , | (j, p)| 6 p7/64 , |Re (j)| 6 7/64.
(j, p), (j), j = 1, 2, L
(s, ) = L(s, )L(s, ),
2
Y
L(s, ) =
R (s + (j)),
j=1
L(s, ) =
L(s, p ),
L(s, p ) =
2
Y
(1 (j, p)ps )1 .
j=1
[16]
c(, t) = N
n Y
Y
(1 + | (j, v) + it|d(v) )
j=1 v=
(Langlands)
119
. f , L(1/2 + it, f f h)
Sarnak[41] Lau [34] . |f (z)|2 dxdy/y 2 \H
, . g h , L(1/2 + it, f g h)
f (j) Bernstein-Reznikov[3] .
L , .
[1] Arthur J, Clozel L. Simple Algebras, Base Change, and the Advanced Theory of the
Trace Formula. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989
120
10000
[14] Henniart G. Une preuve simple des conjectures de Langlands pour GLn sur un corps
p-adique (French). Invent Math, 2000, 139: 439-455
[15] Ivic A. On sums of Hecke series in short intervals. J Th Nombres Bordeaux, 2001, 13:
453-468
[16] Iwaniec H, Sarnak P. Perspectives on the analytic theory of L-functions. Geom Funct
Anal, 2000, 705-741
[17] Jacquet H. Fonctions de Whittaker associees aux groupes de Chevalley (French). Bull
Soc Math France, 1967, 95: 243-309
[18] Jacquet H, Langlands R P. Automorphic Forms on GL(2). Berlin: Springer-Verlag,
1970
[19] Jutila M, Motohashi Y. Uniform bound for Hecke L-functions. Acta Math, 2005, 195:
61-115
[20] Jutila M, Motohashi Y. Uniform bounds for Rankin-Selberg L-functions // Multiple
Dirichlet series, automorphic forms, and analytic number theory. Proc Sympos Pure
Math, 2006, 243-256
[21] Katz N M. An overview of Delignes work on Hilberts twenty-first problem. Proc
Sympos Pure Math AMS, 1976, XXVIII: 537-557
[22] Kim H H. Functoriality for the exterior square of GL4 and the symmetric fourth of GL2 .
J AMS, 2003, 16: 139-183
[23] Kim H, Sarnak P. Appendix 2: refined estimates towards the Ramanujan and Selberg
conjectures. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 2003, 16: 175-181
[24] Kim H H, Shahidi F. Cuspidality of symmetric powers with applications. Duke Math
J, 2002, 112: 177-197
[25] Kim H H, Shahidi F. Functorial products for GL2 GL3 and the symmetric cube for
GL2 . Ann of Math, 2002, 155(2): 837-893
[26] Kowalski E, Michel P and VanderKam J. Rankin-Selberg L-functions in the level aspect.
Duke Math J, 2002, 114: 123-191
[27] Kutzko P. The Langlands conjecture for GL2 of a local field. Ann of Math, 1980, 112(2):
381-412
[28] Lafforgue L. Chtoucas de Drinfeld et correspondance de Langlands (French). Invent
Math, 2002, 147: 1-241
[29] Langlands R P. Automorphic representations. Shimura varieties and motives Proc Symp
Pure Math, 1979, XXXIII: 205-246
[30] Langlands R P. Base Change for GL(2). Princeton University Press and University of
Tokyo Press, 1980
[31] Langlands R P. Euler Products. Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn London, 1971
[32] Langlands R P. http://www.sunsite.ubc.ca/DigitalMathArchive/Langlands/
(Langlands)
121
122
10000
1
Gauss Conjecture on Real Quadratic Number Fields
with Class Number One
1801 (Disquisitions Arithmeticae)
, a, b, c,
ax2 + bxy + cy 2 = n n (x, y).
(Fermat) 17 4 1 p
, x2 +y 2 = p . p = (x+iy)(xiy)(i =
1), a + ib , a b (
). Z[i] () ,
( Z ). Z
Z[i] , = a + ib ,
0, 1 i, || = a2 + b2 .
, 4 1 p
( p ). Z[i] ,
(|| > 2) ,
. Z[i] , ,
n, x2 + y 2 = n , (x, y)
.
K = Q[ d], d , d 6= 1 d p
.
"
#
1+ d
K OK = Z[d]( d 2, 3(mod4) ), Z
2
( d 1(mod4) ). K = Q[ d], OK
d > 0 , K = Q[ d] ( K ), d < 0
, K . d = 1, 2, 3, 7, 11, 19, 43, 67 163 ,
OK , .
K, OK .
(I) 9 K, OK ;
123
(II) K, OK .
.
(, ) () OK .
K I(K) P (K), , C(K) =
I(K)/P (K) K (), . C(K)
h(K) = |C(K)| K (). h(K) = 1
OK , OK .
,
(I0 ) 1 9 ;
(II00 ) 1 .
(I0 ) 1967 Baker Stark
. , .
(II00 ) .
. 1983 , H.Cohen
H.W.Lenstra ,
G, D(K) 6 x , G
x + , .
. K = Q[ d] , D(K) = 4d(
d 2, 3(mod4) ), D(K) = d( d 1(mod4) ). D(K)
, K , h(K) > 2. Cohen-Lenstra , D(K)
, D(K) 6 x 1 ( x +
) 76%. H.Cohen H.W.Lenstra ,
. ,
[2] , .
[1] Cohen H. Advanced Topics in Computational Number Theory. Berlin: Springer-Verlag,
2000
[2] Cohen H. Constructing and counting number fields. Proceeding of the ICM(Beijing,
2002), Vol.II: Invited lectures. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2002, 129-138
[3] Cohen H and Lenstra Jr H W. Heuristics on class groups of number fields. Number
theory. Noordwijkerhout(1983). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1984, 33-62
10000
124
(Riemann)zeta
Transcendence of Values of Riemann Zeta Function
at Odd Positive Integers
zeta
.
.
, .
, Liouville 1844
. Hermite 1873 e
Lindemman 1882 ,
, Hilbert 23 7 .
, ,
,
, zeta .
s > 1,
(s) =
+
X
1
.
ms
m=1
zeta . Euler 18
. Riemann 1859
. ,
n > 1, (2n) = bn 2n , bn . (2n)
.
n > 1, (2n + 1) .
Apery 1978 (3) , 2000 , Rivoal
(Riemann)zeta
125
[1] Baker A. Transcendental Number Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1975
[2] Liouville J. Sur des classes tr`es etendues de quantites dont la valeur nest ni rationnelle
ni meme reductible `
a des irrationnelles algebriques. C R, 1844, 18: 883-885, 910-911
[3] Rivoal T. La fonction zeta de Riemann prend une infinite de valeurs irrationnelles aux
entiers impairs. C R Acad Sci Paris Ser I Math, 2000, 331: 267-270
[4] Waldschmidt M. Diophantine Approximation on Linear Algebraic Groups.
Berlin:
Springer-Verlag, 2000
[5] Waldschmidt M. Un demi-si`ecle de transcendance. Development of mathematics, 19502000, 1121-1186, Birkh
auser, Basel, 2000
10000
126
(Riemann)
Riemann Conjecture
,
zeta ,
.
,
, ,
. , ,
,
. , .
,
, , . ,
(x), x . x , (x)
.
(x) , Legendre .
, x , (x) x/ ln x, 1, ln x
x . , .
, x , (x) .
, , , ,
. , .
x > 1 ,
1
X
Y
1
1
=
1
,
nx
px
p
n=1
p .
, .
1850 , Chebyshev (x)
. c1 (< 1) c2 (> 1), c1 x/ ln x 6 (x) 6
c2 x/ ln x. Chebyshev ,
c1 c2 , 1, Chebyshev .
(Riemann)
127
1859 ,
, (x) ,
, . ,
, (x) .
.
, x s. Re(s)
s , Im(s) s . Re(s) > 1 ,
X
1
,
(s) =
ns
n=1
zeta . , Re(s) > 1 ,
s , .
(s) , s = 1 , (s)
. s = 2, 4, 6, (s) , .
06Re(s) 6 1 , , . (s)
, Re(s) = 1/2 , . ,
(s) .
,
. , s = + it,
c
> 1 2/3
ln (|t| + 2) ln ln1/3 (|t| + 10)
, (s) . , , (s)
, , .
, ,
X
X
x
ln p = x
+ ,
p6 x
| Im() |6 T
p , (s) , 26 T 6 x. ,
(s) , (x) .
, Re() , . , (s)
.
, 1896 , Hadamard Vallee Poussin
Re() < 1, . (x),
Z x
dt
x
(x) =
+O
,
lnA x
2 ln t
A , , O(x1 ).
10000
128
,
Z
(x) =
2
dt
+ O x1/2+ .
ln t
, , ,
(s) . ,
.
, ,
. ,
, . ,
(s) , , (s) , (s)
. , (s) ,
.
,
, . ,
21 , .
[1] , . . : , 1997
129
.
1
.
, .
,
Liouville 1844 , Hilbert 23
7 .
, ,
Hermite 1873 e ,
Lindemman 1882 ,
. ,
, ,
,
.
n
X
1
log n.
n > 1, un =
k
k=1
(un )n>1 . 1734 ,
. 0.577215664 . ()
. , Mertens
Y
p6x
1
1
p
e
=
log x
1+O
1
log x
(x > 2),
p > 2 . ,
, .
,
, . ,
. Hilbert
. ,
10000
130
, S. Kondo 20 , T.
Papanikolaou r/s, s > 10242080 .
[1] Baker A. Transcendental Number Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1975
[2] Havil J. Gamma: Exploring Eulers Constant. Princeton: Princeton University Press,
2003
[3] . . : , 1957
[4] Liouville J. Sur des classes tr`es etendues de quantites dont la valeur nest ni rationnelle
ni meme reductible `
a des irrationnelles algebriques. C. R. 1844, 18: 883-885, 910-911
[5] Waldschmidt M. Un demi-si`ecle de transcendance. Development of mathematics 19502000, 1121-1186, Birkh
auser, Basel, 2000
BSD
131
BSD
The BSD Conjecture on Alliptic Curves
a b , 4a3 + 27b2 6= 0, E : y 2 = x3 + ax + b
Q . E(Q)
, E(Q) (
). Mordell 1922 E(Q) ,
E(Q) = E(Q)f E(Q)t , E(Q)t E(Q) E(Q)f
, E(Q)f E , r(E). r(E)
, r(E) = 0 y 2 = x3 + ax + b .
, (Taniyama) (Shimura) A.Weil
20 50 70 . A.Wiles
1994 , 20 .
Birch Swinnerton-Dyer 1963-1965 ,
E(Q) ( E L ) .
, 21 .
p, 4a3 +27b2 p , y 2 = x3 +ax+b
Fp , Np Fp (),
Y
E L L(E, s) =
Lp (E, s), p 4a3 + 27b2
p
10000
132
133
,
. , .
p k (k > 3). , 1844 Eisenstein
, Kummer 1850-1859 k .
. ( Lemmermeyer [8]
), ,
Q .
K Q(), Z[x] 1
g(x) = xn + an1 xn1 + + a1 x + a0 (ai Z), g(x) n
K/Q ( K Q ). g(x) Q
. OK K , Dedekind OK
() , , OK
, , . ,
p OK pOK pOK = P1e1 Pses , P1 , , Ps
OK , ei > 1. , OK /Pi Fp = Z/pZ ,
OK /Pi pfi , fi Pi . [e1 , , es ; f1 , , fs ]
134
10000
p OK .
K, K p OK
p OK
g(x) Fp . g(x) Z[x] , g(x)
p Fp = Z/pZ , Fp [x] g(x) =
g1 (x)e1 gs (x)es (modp), g1 (x), , gs (x) Fp [x] 1 .
gi (x) fi (1 6 i 6 s), e1 f1 + + es fs = n, [e1 , , es ; f1 , , fs ]
g(x)(modp) . , p OK
g(x) Fp [x] .
K = Q( q), q , = q
g(x) = x2 q. g(x) x2 (modq), q OK qOK = Q2
, q K . p p 6= q,
(q/p) = 1 , q p , q a2 (modp), x2 q (x a)(x +
a)(modp), pOK = P1 P2 , P1 P2 , p K
. (q/p) = 1 , q p , x2 q( mod p) ,
pOK OK , p K . , p(6= q) OK
p1 q1
(q/p) . (q/p) (1) 2 2 = (p/q),
p q( q 1( mod 4) ) p 4q( q 3( mod 4) )
. , p(6= q) K = Q( q)
p D , D = q 4q K . ,
K = Q( d), p OK (
) p D(K) , D(K) K ,
D(K) = |d| ( d 1(mod4) ) D(K) = 4 |d|( d 2, 3(mod4) ).
, L/K, OK
OL , .
, L/K , .
L/K L/K , (
). 1920 , , .
, Artin 1925 L/K ,
Artin . L/K , ,
. Artin , L/K
G = Gal(L/K) . L/K , G , G
( G ). G , G
, GL(n, K) ,
n > 2, GL(n, K) K n .
135
, . Langlands ,
. , Langlands
, Langlands , Langlands
. Hecke
, ,
.
[1] Collison M J. The origins of the cubic and biquadratic reciprocity laws. Arch History
Exact Sci, 1977, 17: 63-69
[2] Cox D A. Quadratic reciprocity: the conjecture and application. Amer Math Monthly,
1988, 95: 442-448
[3] Edwards H M. Kummer, Eisenstein, and higher reciprocity laws. Number theory related
to Fermats last theorem, Progress in Math 26(ed. By Koblitz N), 1983, 31-43
[4] Evans R. Rational reciprocity laws. Acta Arith, 1981, 39: 281-294
[5] Gerstenhaber M. The 152nd proof of the law of quadratic reciprocity. Amer Math
Monthly, 1963, 70: 397-398
[6] Tate J. Problem 9: The general reciprocity law. Proc Symp Pure Math, 1976, 28:
311-322
[7] Wyman B F. What is a reciprocity law. Amer Math, Monthly, 1972, 79: 571-586
[8] Lemmermeyer F. Reciprocity laws, from Euler to Eisenstein. Berlin: Springer-Verlag,
2000
136
10000
K Q , K
Q . L K ,
K L. L K ,
K . L K
, Gal(L/K), L/K
. |Gal(L/K)| 6 [L : K]([L : K] = dimK L L
K , L/K ).
|Gal(L/K)| = [L : K] , L/K . L/K ,
Gal(L/K) () (), L K .
L1 L2 K , L1 L2 ( L1 L2
) K . , K
, K K ab , K .
K, K ab , K
, K ab
19 , 19 . 1893 ,
.
. , 1897 4
.
, , .
, Q Qab ,
.
1853 , Kronecker Q Qab
2i
. Qm = Q(e m ), m . Qm /Q
S
2i
. , Weber , Qab =
Qm = Q(e m ; m > 2).
m>2
Qm Qn Q[m,n] , [m, n] m n
137
, K Q
K , Kronecker-Weber .
, 20
, (Tagaki) 1920 , (class field theory).
, K = Q( d)(d > 1)
K ab , .
K, K ab Kronecker 1880 ,
Kronecker , Dedekind
, . Kronecker
.
Kronecker-Weber 1 e2ix
n
n/m e2i m Q , Q Qab .
Kronecker K ,
n
K .
f (z) f
m
f (z) , , 1 2 (
, 1 = 2 ), z, f (z + 1 ) = f (z + 2 ) = f (z).
n1 n2 , f (z + n1 1 + n2 2 ) = f (z). n1 1 + n2 2 (n1 , n2 Z)
() , , L = L(1 , 2 ).
n, nL L. = a + bi(a b , b 6= 0) L L, L
. Kronecker , K, K,
L L f (z), K ab = K(f (a) : a Q), f (z)
a = n/m K K K ab .
, , K
K . ,
, .
[1] Manin Yu I, Panchishkim A A. Introduction to Modern Number Theory. 2nd edition.
Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2005
[2] Neukirch J. Algebriac Number Theory. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1999
[3] Lang S. Elliptic Functions. Second edition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1987
10000
138
(Iwasawa)
The Main Conjecture of Iwasawa Theory
p , a, b, px a b, p
|a b|p = px . Q, , p .
Qp , Z p Zp .
Zp = {a0 + a1 p + an pn + : 0 6 ai 6 p 1}.
, 1, 1 + 3, 1 + 3 + 32 , Z 3 , Z3
+
X
1
1
3n =
= ! .
13
2
n=0
. , p
.
X
n, Zp x =
ai pi pn ,
pn
n
X
ai pi , Zp Z/pn Z .
i=0
, Zp Z/pn Z (n > 1) . ,
(An )n>1 (), An+1 An () ,
(An ) .
1950 (
Q ) Zp , Zp Zp
. , n n = e2i/n . 1, n , , nn1 n
, Q(n ) , Z[n ] = {a0 + a1 n + + an1 nn1 :
ai Z}. . ,
Z[n ] ,
. Zp
K = Q(p ) Kn = Q(pn+1 ) K = Q(p ),
(Iwasawa)
139
, . A B,
A B . ,
M r /(pk ) /(f ) , f
T n p. f ch(M ), M
, Zp .
Zp . Kn , p
An . , p , Zp ; Kn /K
, An Zp [Gn ] . Kn+1 Kn ,
An+1 An , A, .
, Z[pn ], pn 1 pi n /1 pn ( p i)
, . Cn , En ,
En /Cn . p , , (En /Cn )p
E/C, .
(, ) : ch(A) = ch(E/C).
, A , .
X 1
. , (p, s) = (s) (1 ps ) =
, p
ns
p-n
, Zp , Zp [T ]
. p p L ,
. Coates-Wiles Coleman ch(E/C)
.
.
. 1972 , Mazur
, .
, motive . p
(Fontaine, Colmez ) p BSD Serre .
1983 , Mazur Wiles .
Kolyvagin , Rubin ,
.
.
[1] Iwasawa K. On -extensions of algebraic number fields. Bull Amer Math Sco, 1959, 65:
183-226
140
10000
[2] Mazur B and Wiles A. Calss fields of abelian extensions of Q. Invent Math, 1984, 76:
179-330
[3] Rubin K. The main conjecture of Iwasawa theory for imaginary quadratic fields. Invent
Math, 1991, 103: 25-68
(Abel) Davenport
141
(Abel) Davenport
Davenports Constants for Finite Abelian Groups
Abel G Davenport D(G) k
k G a1 , , ak , {1, , k}
X
I
ai =0. Abel G Davenport D(G)
iI
.
G n Abel , a1 , , an G, G n ,
s0 = 0, s1 = a1 , s2 = a1 + a2 , , sn = a1 + + an
, 0 6 i < j 6 n 0 = sj si = ai+1 + + aj . D(G)
D(G)6 |G|.
Davenport H. Davenport 1966
Abel G K,
Davenport D(G).
n Zn =Z/nZ, D(Zn ) = n. Olson D(Zn Zn ) =
2n 1, G r Zn D(G)=1 + r(n 1);
. 1 Abel G
Zn1 Znr , 1 < n1 |n2 | |nr , r(G)=r exp(G)=nr
r
X
G , d*(G)=
(ni 1). Abel p G, 1969
i=1
10000
142
iI
n1 = = nk = 1 Zq EGZ .
[1] Alford W R, Granville A, Pomerance C. There are infinitely many Carmichael numbers.
Ann of Math, 1994, 139: 703-722
[2] Erd
os P, Ginzburg A, Ziv A. Theorem in the additive number theory. Bull Research
Council Israel, 1961, 10: 41-43
[3] . A combinatorial problem on finite abelian groups. J Number Theory, 1996,
58: 100-103
[4] , Geroldinger A. Zero-sum problems in finite abelian groups: a survey. Expo
Math, 2006, 24: 337-369
[5] Geroldinger A, Schneider R. On Davenports constant. J Combin Theory Ser A, 1992,
61: 147-152.
[6] Grynkiewicz D J. A weighted Erd
os-Ginzburg-Ziv theorem. Combinatorica, 2006, 26:
445-453
[7] Olson J E. A combinatorial problem on finite abelian groups. I J Number Theory,
1969, 1: 8-10
[8] Olson J E. A combinatorial problem on finite abelian groups. II J Number Theory,
1969, 1: 195-199
[9] Reiher C. On Kemnitz conjecture concerning lattice-points in the plane. Ramanujan
J, 2007, 13: 333-337
[10] . Unification of zero-sum problems, subset sums and covers of Z. Electron Res
Announc Amer Math Soc, 2003, 9: 51-60
Cheeger-Goresky-MacPherson
143
Cheeger-Goresky-MacPherson
Cheeger-Goresky-MacPherson Conjecture
Hodge .
. 1982 , Cheeger-Goresky-MacPherson
L2 (intersection cohomology group)
, .
V , V 0 V . V 0
Fubini-Study L2-de Rham V
[1] Cheeger J, Goresky M and MacPherson R. L2-cohomology and intersection homology
for singular varieties. Ann Math Stud 102 Seminar on Differential Geometry, 1982,
303-340
[2] Ohsawa T. Cheeger-Goresky-MacPherson conjecture for varieties with isolated singularities. Math Z, 1991, 206: 219-224
10000
144
Chern-Moser
Problem of Chen-Moser
Cartan-Chern-Moser [2] , M C n ,
, ,
. n > 3 , Chern-Moser[2]
S , . S 0
M B n ; n = 2 ,
, Cartan P [1] . , M
Chern-Moser S( n = 2 Cartan P ) ,
(CR) (umbilical point)[2] . M .
M CR , M CR ,
. , , , S P 0
, . Cartan-Chern-Moser
. , M
(ellipsoid) . , Webster
, n > 3 C n
. [5], C 2 .
Webster , [4] , C 2
4 .
Hamburger [3] R3
. CR Hamburger . ,
1 C 2 CR
Chern-Moser [2] 2,
2 CR , CR
Cartan-Chern-Moser-Webster ,
, , , .
.
CR , .
Chern-Moser
145
[1] Cartan E. Sur les vari\et\es pseudo-conformal des hypersurfaces de lespace de deux
variables complexes. Ann Mat Pura Appl, 1932, 11(4): 17-90
[2] Chern S S and Moser J K. Real hypersurfaces in complex manifolds. Acta Math, 1974,
133: 219-271
[3] Hamburger H. Beweis einer Caratheodoryschen vermutung. Teil I Ann of Math, 1940,
41: 63-86; II. Acta Math, 1941, 73: 175-228; III. Acta Math, 1941, 73: 229-332
[4] Huang X and Ji S. Every real ellipsoid in C 2 admits CR umbilical points. Trans Amer
Math. Soc. 2007, 359: 1191-1204
[5] Webster S. Holomorphic differential invariants for an ellipsoidal real hypersurface. Duke
Math J, 2000, 104(3): 463-475
Rutgers University,
10000
146
CR Bonnet Siu
CR Bonnet Siu
147
. [3] , CR
, . , ,
, (V1 ,0) (V2 ,0) .
, Kaehler ,
Y. T. Siu ,
2(Y. T. Siu) (Vj , 0) C n , 0
3. Mj, = Vj {|z| = } . V2 \{0}
0 Kaehler , [4] .
M1, M2, , V1 V2
[1] Ebenfelt P, Huang X and Zaitsev D. The equivalence problem and rigidity for hypersurfaces embedded into hyperquadrics. Amer Jour of Math, 2005, 127: 129-168
[2] Ebenfelt P, Huang X and Zaitsev D. CR submanifolds embedded in hyperquadrics.
Comm in Analysis and Geometry, 2004, 12(3): 629-668
[3] Huang X. On the mapping problem for algebraic real hypersurfaces in complex spaces
of different dimensions. Annales de LInstitut Fourier, 1994, 44: 433-463
[4] Siu Y T. The complex analyticity of harmonic maps and the strong rigidity of compact
Kaehler manifolds. Ann of Math, 1981, 112: 73-111
Rutgers University,
10000
148
(Griffiths)
Problem of Griffiths
. , K. Kodaira
. Kodaira
, Nakano Griffiths
. Griffiths Chern
. Nakano
.
Nakano Griffiths , , .
1969 , P. Griffiths
(ample) , Griffiths
.
Griffiths Umemura 1973 ,
. B.Berndtsson, Mourougane-Takayama ,
(determinant bundle) Griffiths .
[1] Griffiths P A. Hermitian differential geometry, Chern classes and positive vector bundles,
Global Analysis, papers in honor of K Kodaira. Princeton: Princeton Univ Press, 1969,
181-251
[2] Berndtsson B. Curvature of vector bundles and subharmonicity of the Bergman kernel.
arXiv:math/0505470v1
(Hartshorne)
149
(Hartshorne)
Hartshornes Conjecture
,
(, , , ) . ,
, .
. . 1
, (). r
r (),
. , Pn , 2
.
Pn (n > 4) 2
. Horrocks Mumford[1] 1973 P4 2
. , 4 2
. Mumford [2] 181 ()
. 1974 , Hartshorne [3,4] .
Hartshorne n > 7 , Pn 2
.
[5] .
n > 7 , Pn n 2 X Pn , X
H1 H2 , X p
, p . , X
I(X) 2 , I(X)
X . Hartshorne X
2
d > n, , X n d
3
Barth Van de Ven[6] n > 1 , Pn 2 En ,
En En+1 Pn Pn+1 , En
Hartshorne . Grauert Schneider[7] n > 5 ,
Pn 2 [8] ,
n > 5 , 2 ,
c21 > 4c2 . , .
10000
150
E k, H i (Pn , E(k)) = 0, i = 1, , n 1,
E(k) = E OPn (k). , E E P2
Pn . ,
Hartshorne .
Hartshorne . , Hartshorne
, , .
( [9]).
F1 , F2 , F3 C[x0 , , xn ] . 6 P11 ,
P12 , P13 , P21 , P22 , P23 F1 = P12 P23 P13 P22 , F2 = P11 P23 P13 P21 , F3 =
P11 P22 P12 P21 , F1 , F2 , F3 2 3 (Pij ) , F1 , F2 , F3
.
F1 , F2 , F3 , Pij ,
, F1 , F2 , F3 .
Hartshorne n > 7, F1 , F2 , F3 C[x0 , , xn ]
. i, F1 |xi =1 , F2 |xi =1 , F3 |xi =1 ,
F1 , F2 , F3 .
n r , Pn r . , N. Mohan
Kumar 2 5 2 .
[1] Horrocks G and Mumford D. A rank 2 vector bundle on P4 with 15,000 symmetries.
Topology, 1973, 12: 63-81
[2] Mumford D and Fogarty J. Geometric invariant theory. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag,
1982
[3] Hartshorne R. Varieties of small codimension in projective space. Bull Amer Math Soc,
1974, 80: 1017-1032
[4] Hartshorne R. Algebraic vector bundles on projective spaces: a problem list. Topology,
1979, 18: 117-128
[5] Okonek C, Schneider M and Spindler H. Vector bundles on complex projective space.
Progress in Math 3. Birkhauser, 1980
[6] Barth W, van de Ven A De. A decomposability criterion for algebraic 2-bundles on
projective spaces. Invent Math, 1974, 25: 91-106
[7] Schneider M. Vector bundles and submanifolds of projective space: nine open problems//Algebraic Geometry, Bowdoin 1985. Proc Symposia in Pure Math, 46, AMS,
(Hartshorne)
151
1987, 101-107
[8] Grauert H, Schneider M. Komplexe Unterr
aume und holomorphe Vektorraumb
undel
vom Rang zwei. Math Ann, 1977, 230: 75-90
[9] Tan S L. Integral closure of a cubic extension and applications. Proc Amer Math Soc,
2001, 129: 2553-2562
10000
152
(Iitaka) C n, m
Iitaka Conjecture: Cn,m
m
m
(X, ). m > 0, (X, ) = 0, X
(X) = . , m > 0 (X, m ) 6= 0,
C s0 , , sN +1 (N > 0), X
PN ( m X Zariski , ).
X (X) m , X m
, 6 (X) 6 dim(X). (X) = dim(X), X
.
(Iitaka) Cn,m
153
[1] Ueno K. Classification Theory of Algebraic Varieties and Compact Complex Spaces.
Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1975
[2] Ueno K. Classification of algebraic varieties I. Comp Math, 1973, 27: 277-342
[3] Viehweg E. Canonical divisors and the additivity . Comp Math, 1977, 35: 197-223
[4] Kawamata Y. Minimal models and the Kodaira dimension . J Reine Angew Math,
1985, 363: 1-46
[5] Koll
ar J. Subadditivity of the Kodaira dimension: fibers of general type. Algebraic
geometry, Sendai, 1985, 361-398, Adv Stud Pure Math, 10, 1987
[6] Fujino O. Algebraic fiber spaces whose general fibers are of maximal Albanese dimension.
Nagoya Math J, 2003, 172: 111-127
[7] Fujino O. Remarks on algebraic fiber spaces. J Math Kyoto Univ, 2005, 45(4): 683-699
10000
154
(Nagata)
Nagatas Conjecture
, ,
, Nagata .
f (x, y) , C2
C . d f (x, y) , C d
, d . C P = (a, b), f (a + x, b + y)
, C P . C
, 1 .
d, m, n , P1 , , Pn C2 ,
, . d
, P1 , , Pn m. , d
. n = 3, m = 1 () .
Nagata 1959 [4] n 9 r2 ,
d d > m n. n
. Nagata .
P1 , , Pn C2 , m1 , , mn .
d C, 1 6 i 6 n, C Pi mi , d2 >
m21 + + m2n .
Nagata .
Nagata , Hilbert
, Nagata .
Nagata 50
(Nagata)
155
, , Nagata
. Nagata . [5]
, .
[1] Evain L. Une minoration du degre de courbes planes `
a singulartites imposees. Bulletin
de la SMF, 1998, 126: 525-543
[2] Ciliberto C, Miranda R. Degenerations of planar linear systems. J Reine Angew Math,
1998, 501: 191-220
[3] Harbourne B. On Nagatas conjecture. preprint, arXiv:math.AG/9909093v1(1999) 1-6
[4] Nagata M. On the 14-th problem of Hilbert. Amer J Math, 1959, 81: 766-772
[5] Xu G. Curves in P2 and symplectic packings. Math Ann, 1994, 299: 609-613
10000
156
Tate-Oort
The Tate-Oort Problem on Group Schemes
G n , g G g n = e,
. nG : G G g 7 g n , nG
{e}.
G S , n, nG : G G n
, nG = 0 ( nG S)?
Tate-Oort ( [3], [1]
[2]).
R, A , R . : A R A A
a R b 7 ab ( A ). : R A ( R A
), : A A, : A A R A, : A R R- (
R ),
(i) (idA R ) = ( R idA ) : A A R A R A ();
A ();
(ii) ( R idA ) = (idA R ) = idA : A R R A =
(iii) ( R idA ) = (idA R ) = : A A (),
A R Hopf .
(iv) = : A A R A, (a R b) = b R a,
A .
, G , A = R[G], G R (
a1 g1 + + ar gr , ai R, gi G, , G ), A
Hopf .
(i), (ii) (iv) A R Rn ,
AD = HomR (A, R), A , AD D : AD R AD
AD , D : R AD , (i) D , (ii) D (1)
AD , (iv) AD .
Hopf .
Tate-Oort
157
n
A R Hopf . n, n : AR R A A
a1 R R an 7 a1 a2 an , . ,
n
n : A AR R A. nA = A A : A A. Tate-Oort
Hopf
0 A R Hopf . A R Rn ,
nA (A) = R?
Tate-Oort G S ( (iv) )
, Deligne , . ,
, .
, Tate-Oort
(A) S Q- (, R Q );
(B) S (, R ).
[1] Demazure M, Grothendieck A. Schemas en Groupes I-III (SGA 3). Berlin: SpringerVerlag, 1970
[2] Oort F. Commutative Group Schemes, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1966
[3] Tate J, Oort F. Group schemes of prime order. Ann Sc Ecole Norm Sup, 1970, 3: 1-21
10000
158
Tate
Tate Conjecture
,
, Hodge
, Tate .
k , k k , X k n
, ` k , H i (X k k, Q` ) X k k i ` adic
. Y X k j ,
Tr : H 2(nj) (Y k k, Q` )(n j) Q` ,
,
H 2(nj) (X k k, Q` )(n j) Q` .
Poincare
Hom(H 2(nj) (X k k, Q` )(n j), Q` )
= H 2j (X k k, Q` )(j),
H 2j (X k k, Q` )(j) , Y
. Gal(k/k) H 2j (X k k, Q` )(j) . Gal(k/k)
H 2(nj) (Y k k, Q` )(nj) , Tr Poincare
Gal(k/k) , Gal(k/k) Y
. Aj (X) H 2j (X k k, Q` )(j) X j k
Q . Gal(k/k) Aj (X) .
Tate( [1]) H 2j (X k k, Q` )(j) Gal(k/k)
Aj (X) Q` .
A1 A2 k Abel , Tate
Homk (A1 , A2 ) Q` HomGal(k/k) (H 1 (A2 , Q` ), H 1 (A1 , Q` ))
Tate
159
[1] Faltings G. Endlichkeitss
atze f
ur abelsche Variet
aten u
ber Zhalk
orpern. Invent Math
1983, 73: 349-366
[2] Tate J. Algebraic cycles and poles of zeta functions, Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry,
New York: Harper and Row, 1965, 288-295
[3] Zarhin J. Isogenies of abelian varieties over fields of finite characteristics. Math USSRSb, 1974, 24: 451-461
[4] Zarhin J. A remark on endomorphisms of abelian varieties over function fields of finite
characteristic. Math USSR-Izv, 1974, 8: 477-480
10000
160
: 1 (M m ) Gl(n, C).
M m , Donaldson Corlette ,
V u. D V . u, Cartan
M m ,
D = + + + ,
, (V, ) , E, E 1 , = 0.
, (quasi-isomorphism)
D
D
D
1) VD ({A. (V), D}) = A0 (V) A1 (V) A2 (V) );
2) {. (E), } {A. (E), Du 00 }.
, VD V Ai (V) V i i (E)
E i Ai (E) E i .
1 Poincare Dolbeaut
.
M m ,
,
, VD [1] ;
L2 .
2 (1) V Hodge , M m , Zucker
( [2]), Cattani-Kaplan-Schmid(
[3]) Kashiwara-Kawai( [4]) , Jost- -Zuo
( [5]).
161
-Zuo ( [6]).
(3) , .
[1] Cheeger J, Goresky M and MacPerson R. L2 -cohomology and Intersection homology of
singular algebraic varieties. Seminar on differential geometry, ed. S T Yau, Ann Math
Stuydies, 1982, 102: 303-340
[2] Zucker S. Hodge theory with degenerating coefficients: L2 -cohomology in Poincare metric. Ann Math, 1979, 109: 415-476
[3] Cattani E, Kaplan A, Schmid W. L2 and intersection cohomologies for a polarizable
variation of Hodge structure. Inventiones Math, 1987, 87: 217-252
[4] Kashiwara M, Kawai T. The Poincare lemma for variations of polarized Hodge structure.
Publ Res Inst Math Sci, 1985, 21: 353-407
[5] Jost J, , Zuo K. Cohomologies of polarized variation of Hodge structure over
quasi-compact Kaehler manifolds. Journal of Algebraic Geometry, 2007, 16: 401-434
[6] Jost J, , Zuo K. Cohomologies of unipotent harmonic bundles on noncompact
curves. Crelles Journal, 2007, 609: 153-179.
10000
162
(Grothendieck)
The Standard Conjecture of Grothendieck
1949 , Weil[7]
,
, . Weil ,
, .
Dwork[3] , Grothendieck Deligne[1] . Grothendieck[5]
Weil , ,
motive . , motive
.
X k , ` k
, H i (X, Q` ) X i `-adic , X
X , cup
(0 6 i 6 n). Lefschetz
Ln2i : Ai (X) Ani (X)
n
0 6 i 6
. Hodge ,
2
n
i 6 , Ai (X) ker(Ln2i+1 )
2
x 7 (1)i Lr2i x.x
. X , [4,6] .
. Weil , Frobenius
, algebraic cycle
numberical equivalence homological equivalence .
(Grothendieck)
163
[1] Deligne P. La conjecture de Weil I. Publ Math IHES, 1974, 43: 273-307
[2] Deligne P. La conjecture de Weil II. Publ Math IHES, 1981, 52: 313-428
[3] Dwork B. On the rationality of the zeta functions of an algebraic variety. Amer J Math,
1960, 82: 631-648
[4] Griffiths P and Harris J. Principles of Algebraic Geometry. John Wiley & Sons, inc,
1978
[5] Grothendieck A. Standard conjectures on algebraic cycles. Algebraic Geometry, Bombay
Colloquium. Oxford, 1969, 193-199
[6] Hartshorn R. Algebraic Geometry. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1979
[7] Weil A. Number of solutions of equations over finite fields. Bull Amer Math Soc, 1949,
55: 497-508
10000
164
165
I R f , f I . S R
,
(S 1 I) = S 1 (I ),
. C. Huneke [2] ,
,
. 20 , , [2]
, , , , K. Smith[3]
binomial , .
? Brenner Monsky [1]
, . , , ,
?
[1] Brenner H and Monsky P. Tight closure does not commute with localization. arXiv:
0710.2913v2 [math.AC] 29 Oct. 2007
[2] Huneke C. Tight Closure and its Applications. CBMS Lecture Notes in Mathematics
No.88, AMS, Providence, 1996
[3] Smith K. Tight closure commutes with localization in binomial rings. Proc Amer Math
Soc, 2000, 129: 667-669
10000
166
. , .
R Noether . M R , p R
, M m m AnnR (m) p,
p M . M M , , M
M . M R
, M . , .
. R , I R , M
R , M I i HIi (M )
,
HIi (M ) = lim
ExtiR (R/I n , M ).
,
. , (
[2]). , R , .
.
C. Huneke [3]
, ,
. Grothendieck .
R , C. Huneke, R.Y. Sharp G. Lyubeznik
. , : Brodmann Lashgari[1]
HI0 (M ), HI1 (M ), ,
.
, Katzman[4] . ,
,
. , ?
, ?
.
167
[1] Brodmann M and Lashgari A. A finiteness result for associated primes of local cohomology modules. Proc Amer Math Soc, 2000, 128: 2851-2853
[2] Brodmann M and Sharp R Y. Local Cohomology - an algebraic introduction with geometric applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998
[3] Huneke C. Problems on local cohomology, Free resolutions in commutative algebra and
algebraic geometry. Res Notes Math, 2(Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett), 1992
[4] Katzman M. An example of an infinite set of associated primes of a local cohomology
module. J Algebra, 2002, 252: 241-246
10000
168
Calabi-Yau
Chern Number Inequalities on Calabi-Yau Moduli
M 3 , m.
[7] , M . w M Weil-Petersson . [6] ,
w0 = (m + 3) + Ric(ic),
w0 . .
.
Calabi-Yau
. Weil . Douglas- [3]
Weil . , ,
, Calabi-Yau 3 . Calabi-Yau
Weil BCOV [1,2] .
[4] . BCOV Zinger[8] 2007
Zinger [5] .
. , CalabiYau . .
[1] Bershadsky M, Cecotti S, Ooguri H and Vafa C. Holomorphic anomalies in topological
field theories. Nuclear Phys B, 1993, 405: 279-304
[2] Bershadsky M, Cecotti S, Ooguri H and Vafa C. Kodaira-Spencer theory of gravity and
exact results for quantum string amplitudes. Comm Math Phys, 1994: 165: 311-427
[3] M. Douglas and . in preparation
[4] , , . Analytic torsion for Calabi-Yau Three-folds. J Diff Geom, 2008,
80: 175-259, math/0601411
[5] Li J, Zinger A. On the Genus-One Gromov-Witten Invariants of a Quintic Threefold.
preprint, arXiv: math/0406105
[6] Lu Z Q. On the Hodge Metric of the Universal Deformation Space of Calabi-Yau Threefolds. J Geom Anal, 2001, 11(1): 103-118
Calabi-Yau
169
Irvine
10000
170
,
. . K .
Z
|K| < +,
.
[1] ,
Z
K60
. . ,
, .
. , . ,
, , .
171
[2] , , . [3]
, .
[1] Duclos P, Exner P and Krej`ci`rik D. Bound states in curved quantum layers. Comm
Math Phys, 2001, 223(1): 13-28
[2] Lin C and Lu Z. Existence of Bound States for Layers Built over Hypersurfaces in Rn+1 .
J Funct Anal, 2007, 244: 1-25
[3] Lu Z. On the ground state of quantum layers. preprint, arXiv:0708.1563
Irvine
10000
172
Resolution of Singularities
. X , S
. Y f :
Y X f f 1 (X S) f 1 (X S) X S , (Y, f )
X . S X , f .
, .
,
, ,
,
.
X 1 ,
. X 2 ,
0 , 20 30 Walker Zariski , 0
Abhyankar 1956 .
1964 Hironaka , 0
. Hironaka Fields
. , , .
, Hironaka 1/10.
0 ,
.
[1] Abhyankar, Shreeram S. Local uniformization on algebraic surfaces over ground fields
of characteristic p6=0. Ann of Math. 1956, 63(2): 491-526
[2] Danilov V I. Resolution of Singularities. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001
[3] Encinas S, Hauser Herwig. Strong resolution of singularities in characteristic zero. Comment Math Helv, 2002, 77(4): 821-845
[4] Hauser Herwig. The Hironaka theorem on resolution of singularities. Bull Amer Math
Soc (N.S.) 2003, 40(3): 323-403
173
174
10000
Mobius . CR , Poincare
, , B 2 B 2
, . Hartogs-Bochner ,
B 2 CR() B 2 . , Poincare B 2
, B 2 ,
, B 2 . 1978 , Alexander[2] Poincare
, n > 1 , C n B n ,
.
, L, Kobayashi , L B n
, B n . Alexander
B n (n > 1) B n .
, B n B N , B n
B N . [8]
. n > 2 , B n B n+1
, , . ,
, Liouville . ,
Webster , .
175
, N < 2n 2 , B n B N
, , .
20 80 . ,
CR .
1 < 2, B n B N (N 6 2n 2)
C ,
1 < 2 , C
.
[6] ,
.
. [6] N 6 n(n + 1)/2 , B n B N
. , .
2 M1 C n M2 C N , f
M1 M2 (1 < n < N ) CR . N n
t, f M1 C t , ,
t = 3 t = 2?
2 t. t
N n, 2 [7] .
N > n(n + 1)/2 , B n B N (N 6 2n 2)
. , ,
2 .
.
3(DAngelo) M1 , M2 f 2. f . f
176
10000
[2] Alexander H. Proper holomorphic maps in C n . Indiana Univ Math Journal, 1977, 26:
137-146
[3] Cima J and Suffridge T J. A reflection principle with applications to proper holomorphic
mappings. Math Ann, 1983, 265: 489-500
[4] Faran J. The linearity of proper holomorphic maps between balls in the low codimension
case. J Differential Geom, 1986, 24: 15-17
[5] Forstneric F. A survey on proper holomorphic mappings//Proceeding of Year in SCVs
at Mittag-Leffler Institute. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992
[6] Huang X. On a semi-linearity property for holomorphic maps. Asian Jour of Math,
2003, 7(4): 463-492
[7] Forstneric F. Extending proper holomorphic mappings of positive codimension. Invent
Math, 1989, 95: 31-62
[8] Webster S. On mapping an (n + 1)-ball into the complex space. Pac J Math, 1979, 81:
267-272
[9] Meylan F. Degree of a holomorphic map between unit balls from C 2 to C n . Proc Amer
Math Soc, 2006, 134: 1023-1030
Rutgers University,
177
178
10000
Rutgers University,
179
Jacobian Conjecture
K , f1 , , fn K n ( f1 , , fn
K[x1 , , xn ]), f1 , , fn V = K n
f : V V,
(a1 , , an ) 7 (f1 (a1 , , an ), , fn (a1 , , an )).
f
J(f ) = J(f1 , , fn ) =
f
i
xj
det(J(f )) f (
). f , g : V V f g = gf = idV
( K[f1 , , fn ] = K[x1 , , xn ]),
J(f )J(g) = J(g)J(f ) = In ,
det(J(f )) det(J(g)) = 1.
det(J(f )) det(J(g)) , 1 (
K ) .
1939 , Keller[5] .
K 0 , f1 , , fn K[x1 , , xn ]
det(J(f1 , , fn )) K , K[f1 , , fn ] = K[x1 , , xn ].
1 K p > 0 , n ,
f1 = x1 + xp1 , fi = xi (2 6 i 6 n) .
2 K 0 n = 1, , f1
.
3 f1 , , fn , n > 2 ,
f1 = x1 ex2 , f2 = ex2 , fi = xi (3 6 i 6 n) .
n > 2 , .
[1] [3]. 1998 Smale 21 18
.
n, Keller[5] ,
K(f1 , , fn ) = K(x1 , , xn ) . Campbell[2]
10000
180
(Hopf)
181
(Hopf )
Hopfs Conjecture
,
.
S, , Gauss K,
, Gauss K .
, , , Gauss K ,
, Euler (S) . Gauss-Bonnet
. Riemann M , Gauss
, Riemann ,
, Gauss-Bonnet , , Euler
(M ) . , GaussBonnet
.
2n , Riemann ,
M
, Euler
2n ) > 0
(1)n (M
(1)
(, ). Hopf .
n = 1 , Gauss-Bonnet , (1) .
n = 2 , , Gauss-Bonnet , ,
Gauss-Bonnet- , (1) . ( J. Milnor .)
, , Gauss-Bonnet ,
Geroch [5] . Hopf .
, Dodziuk Singer[10] L2 .
Hodge , M. Atiyah L2
. L2 [1] .
M ,
M/ . Hq (M ) M L2 q Hilbert . Von
Neumann , Atiyah Hq (M ) ,
L2 Betti
Bq (M ) = dim Hq (M ).
10000
182
(2)
L2 [9].
,
Dodziuk-Singer M
M . Atiyah ,
L2
Hn (M ) 6= {0},
q 6= n , Hq (M ) = {0},
Hopf .
, Hopf ,
: Bourguignon-Karcher[3] , Donnelly-Xavier[4] Jost-Xin[8] . Borel
1 . , Kahler , ,
Gromov [6] , Jost-Zuo[7] Cao-Xavier
.
[1] Atiyah M F. Elliptic operators, discrete groups and Von Neumann algebra. Asterisque
32-33, 1976, 43-72
[2] Borel A. The L2 -cohomology of negtive curved Riemannian symmetric spaces. Ann
Acard Sci Fennicae, 1983, 10: 95-105
[3] Bourguignon J P and Karcher H. Curvature operators: Pinching easimates and geo Norm Sup, 1978, 11: 71-92
metric examples. Ann Sci Ec
[4] Donnelly H and Xavier F. On the differential form spectrum of negative curved Riemannian manifolds. Amer J Math, 1984, 106: 169-185
[5] Geroch R. Positive sectional curvature does not imply positive Gauss-Bonnet integrand.
Proc A M S, 1976, 54: 267-270
[6] Gromov M. K
ahler hyperbolicity and L2 -Hodge theory. J Diff Geom, 1991, 33: 263-292
[7] Jost J and Zuo K. Vanishing theorem for L2 -cohomology on infinite covering of compact
K
ahler manifolds and applications in algebraic geometry. Comm Geom Annl, 2000, 8:
1-30
[8] Jost J and Xin Y L. Vanishing theorems for L2 -cohomology groups. J Rein angew
Math, 2000, 525: 95-112
(Hopf)
183
[9] L
uck W. L2 -Invariant: Theory and Applications to Geometry and KTheory. Berlin:
Springer-Verlag, 2002
[10] Singer I. Some remarks on operator theory and index theory. Springer Lect Notes
Math, 1977, 575: 128-138
10000
184
(Hopf )
Hopf Problem
H.Hopf [1] S 2 S 2 , ,
. ,
.
Gauss-Bonnet , S 1 S 1 ,
( Gauss ) , Euler . S 1 S 2
[2] . S 2 S 2 . ,
, . Bourguignon ,
, .
, , ,
.
.
.
Hopf
.
[1] Yau S T. Problem section, in Lecture on differential geometry. Internatioanl Press, 1994
[2] Hamilton R S. Three-manifolds with positive Ricci curvature. J Diff Geometry, 1982,
19: 255-306
(Dirac)
185
(Dirac)
Existence of Solutions to Nonlinear Dirac Equations
n M Spin , M
SO(n) Q, Spin(n) P , Q , P
Q . Spin P (associated bundle) S,
. M Levi-Civita S Spin ,
S D e e , {e } M
, Clifford [1,5] . Spin
D = f
(1)
, (S), .
D = m + Hijk h j , k i l ,
(2)
a
n
1
M
), m, Hijk
, , Hijk
, = ( 1 , , n ), i (S), Hijk = (Hijk
, Weierstrass
.
D = 0, Sobolev
, , E. Witten
[6] . ,
, , ,
[4] , , ,
, .
2
M Spin , Chirality ,
[2] ,
() . (1) ,
1
L2 , H 2 , ,
Fredholm , . ,
10000
186
, ,
Lp .
3
,
sigma [7] Yang-Mills . , Spin
[3]
1 i
()h k , j l i,
(3)
D i + ijk ()j k = 0,
i () = Rjkl
2
i
, (M, (g )) (N, (hij )) , () , Rjkl
ijk
N , i (S). twist ,
(3) .
, .
[1] Atiyah M F, Singer I M. The Index of Elliptic Operators: III. Ann of Math, 1968, 87:
546-604
[2] Booss-Bavnbek B, Wojciechowski K P. Elliptic Boundary Problems for Dirac Operatprs.
Birkhaeuser, 1993
[3] Chen Q, Jost J, Li J Y, Wang G F. Dirac-harmonic maps. Math Zeit, 2006, 254: 409-432
[4] Esteban M J, Sere E. Stationary states of the nonlinear Dirac equation: a variational
approach. Comm Math Phys, 1995, 171: 323-350
[5] Lawson H, Michelsohn M L. Spin Geometry. Princeton: Princeton University Press,
1989
[6] Witten E. A new proof of the positive energy theorem. Comm Math Phys, 1981, 80:
381-402
[7] Witten E. Supersymmetric form of nonlinear sigma-model in two dimensions. Phys Rew
D, 1977, 16: 2991-2994
187
Riemann ,
Kahler
CP . Mori 1980 .
n
C n .
Kahler
Kahler
20 80 , .
Poincare-Lelong Kahler
. 2002 , Ricci
. , Chau-Tam
Ricci .
10000
188
, ,
. ,
.
, . ,
.
(,
).
[1] Chau A, Tam L F. A survey on the Kahler-Ricci flow and Yaus Uniformization Conjecture. to appear in Surveys in Differential Geometry, J Differential Geometry
[2] Zhu X P. The Ricci flow on complete noncompact Kahler manifolds, Collected Papers
on Ricci Flow. Series in Geometry and Topology, Vol 37, International Press, 2003
189
K
Quantum Cohomologies Conjecture on K-equivalence Algebra Varieties
X X 0 K , : Y X
0 : Y X 0
KX = KX 0 ,
KX X . K Betti (
[1][2]). . ,
?
[3] Chin-Lung Wang[4] 2001
K .
, , Ruan
. K Ruan
. Ruan orbifold .
.
, .
[5] flop
.
[6] Mukai flop
, Ruan .
Lee, Lin Wang [7] n
flop .
flop, Ruan
[8] , [9] .
[1] Batyrev V. Birational Calabi-Yau n-folds have equal Betti numbers//New trends in
algebraic geometry (Warwick, 1996), Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press, 1999, 1-11
[2] Wang C L. On the topology of birational minimal models. J Diff Geom, 1998, 50:
129-146
[3] Ruan Y. Cohomology ring of crepant resolutions of orbifolds. math.AG/0108195
190
10000
[4] Wang C L. K-equivalence in birational geometry//Proceeding of the Second International Congress of Chinese Mathematicians. International Press, 2003, math.AG/0204160
[5] Li A M and Ruan Y. Symplectic surgery and Gromov-Witten invariants of Calabi-Yau
3-folds. Invent Math, 2001, 145: 151-218
[6] Hu J and Zhang W. Mukai flop and Ruan cohomology. Math Ann, 2004, 330(3): 577-599
[7] Lee Y P, Lin H W and Wang C L. Flops, motives and invariance of quantum rings. to
appear in Annals of Mathematics
[8] Chen B, Li A M, Zhang Q, Zhao G. Singular symplectic flops and Ruan cohomology.
arXiv:0804.3144, to appear in Topology
[9] Chen B, Li A M, Zhao G. Ruans Conjecture on Singular symplectic flops. arXiv:
0804.3143
191
10000
192
3 tight
193
3 tight
Classification of Tight Contact Structures on 3-Manifolds
3 M M 1 (
) T M , , 1 ,
= ker , d 6= 0. 1 M ,
M . M M . M
M T M U (1),
M . Gromov , 3 M , M
M . LutzMartinet ,
3 M , M . 3
(overtwisted) tight
. 3 tight 3 3
. Eliashberg , 3 M , M
M . , 3
tight 3 .
3 tight . S 3
Seifert , tight
, 3 tight
.
, , .
,
,
.
[1] Eliashberg Y. Classification of overtwisted contact structures on 3-manifolds. Invent
Math, 1989, 98: 623-637
194
10000
[2] Etnyre J and Ng L. Problems in low dimensional contact topology//Topology and Geometry of Manifolds, Proc Sympos Pure Math. 71, Amer Math Soc, 2003, 337-357
[3] Honda K. On the classification of tight contact structures I. Geom Topol, 2000, 4: 309368
4 (Poincare)
195
4 (Poincar
e)
Smooth Poincare Conjecture in Dimension 4
1904 , Poincare 3 3
S 3 . Poincare , . Smale
1960 Poincare , M n n > 5
n S n , M n S n . Freedman 1981 4
Poincare , M 4 S 4 4 ,
M 4 S 4 . Perelman 2002 2003 Poincare .
, Milnor 1956 7 ,
7 S 7 , S 7 (). Donaldson 1985
2
2
4 , CP 2 ]9CP , CP 2 ]9CP . ,
FreedmanDonaldson R4 , R4
R4 . FreedmanDonaldson , 4
, , .
2
, , CP 2 ]3CP ,
.
4 Poincare M 4 S 4 4
, M 4 S 4 .
Freedman M 4 S 4 .
[1] Donaldson S. Irrationality and the h-cobordism conjecture. J Differential Geom, 1987,
26: 141-168
[2] Freedman M. The topology of four-dimensional manifolds. J Differential Geom, 1982,
17: 357-453
[3] Kirby R. Problems in low-dimensional topology//Geometric Topology (Kazez W ed.),
AMS/IP Stud Adv Math vol. 2.2, Amer Math Soc, 1997, 35-473
196
10000
(Borel) :
. ,
. , .
,
. , .
.
. , ,
Euler . ,
. , .
: ? ,
? E. Moise
, 1 3 . Reidemeister
2 3 ,
. ,
.
J. H. C. Whitehead
. ,
1 . 1954 G. D. Mostow
, A. Borel 1954 J. P. Serre
.
F. T. Farrell L. E. Jones Borel :
3 4 Riemann , 3 4
.
Borel Poincare
G. Perelman . Borel Novikov , Borel
Euclid Cartesian
(Borel) :
197
. S. Chang, F. T. Farrell
Novikov (, Novikov ),
Borel .
, Erik Guentner, Romain Tessera
Borel .
Borel ,
. , Borel
.
: Borel . A.
Borel 1954 G. D. Mostow
J. P. Serre .
[1] Farrell F T. The Borel conjecture. Topology of high-dimensional manifolds, No. 1, 2
(Trieste, 2001), 225-298, ICTP Lect Notes, 9, Abdus Salam Int Cent Theoret Phys,
Trieste, 2002
[2] Guentner E, Tessera R and Yu G. Complexity of metric spaces and the bounded Borel
conjecture. preprint
[3] Hsiang Wu Chung. Borels conjecture, Novikovs conjecture and the K-theoretic analogues. Algebra, analysis and geometry (Taipei, 1988), 39-58, World Sci Publ, Teaneck,
NJ, 1989
[4] Mostow G D. Strong Rigidity of Locally Symmetric Spaces. Princeton: Princeton Univ
Press, 1973
1 Vanderbilt University
2
10000
198
11
8
11
Conjecture
8
,
1 . Whitehead ,
. , () ,
().
1
, ,
!
0 1
, (1),
1 0
2 1 0
0
0
0
0
0
1 2 1 0
0
0
0
0
0 1 2 1 0
0
0 1
0
0 1 2 1 0
0
0
0
0
0 1 2 1 0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0 1 2
0
0
0
0 1 0
0
0
0
2
, 1 , n
, n [1] . 1982 , ,
S.Donaldson[2] , (1) ,
1 .
, 1981 M.Freedman[3] 1
.
, R4
.
, 1
11/8
11/8 M M IM
,
11
8
199
IM = aE8 b
0 1
1 0
11
-conjecture.
8
[5] Loenne M. On the diffeomorphism groups of elliptic surfaces. Math Ann, 1998, 310:
103-117