Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Edfd454 - Assignment Two
Edfd454 - Assignment Two
S00134606
EDFD454 Curriculum Literacies
Assignment Two: New Media Literacies
PART A
During my third professional experience placement in 2014, I created and taught a two week
unit on Information and Communications Technology in Small Business in Year 11
Business Management, referenced here as Appendix One. Throughout this unit, students
participated in a range of classroom activities including class discussions and brainstorms,
note-taking from a PowerPoint presentation and an ICT application task designed to engage
them with content and achieve desired learning outcomes. Students were summatively
assessed by a topic test conducted at the end of the unit.
PART B
Despite the majority of students achieving great results in their assessment of the original
unit, demonstrating an understanding of the content taught throughout, in hindsight, it
appears that this unit could have been significantly enhanced had the approaches to teaching
and learning been modified. Though the ICT application task encouraged students to create
and apply content to real-life scenarios, no attempts were made to introduce elements of
Design (The New London Group, 1996, p.73) into the coursework, providing little
understanding of how meaning is constructed and used in a business sense. Similarly,
opportunities were not presented for students to engage with new media literacies, that is,
multiliteracies (The New London Group, 1996, p.63) a pedagogy [that] focuses on
modes of representation much broader than language alone (The New London Group, 1996,
p.64) during this unit, depriving their learning of a more contemporary and multimodal
(Kress, 2005, p.1) approach. In this same sense, ICT applications also appear to be somewhat
ineffective for learning: classroom technologies are ultimately used here to enhance the
general approaches to teaching that educators have always implemented (Hennessy et al.,
1|Page
Hayden Broadbent
S00134606
2007, p. 157), rather than being integrated fully into the learning process. Thus, with respect
to Kathy Ann Mills, Amanda Levido (2011) and the iPed (p.80) framework , the original
unit has been completely redesigned, centring focus on new media literacy applications that
encourage critical thinking whilst also retaining some of the elements of the previous course.
In response to changes made, a new assessment task has also been developed to reflect a
more formative approach: now, students are encouraged to Link, Challenge, Co-create and
Share (Mills and Levido, 2011, p.82) their ideas and knowledge about content in pairs,
designing and producing their own website for a fictitious small business. In this sense, new
teaching and learning activities such as interpreting business data, conducting online
research and external website analysis combine with modifications to original approaches
to encourage students to engage with meaning-making and Design (The New London
Group, 1996, p.73) on a whole new level, providing students with a more well-rounded
approach to education in Business Management.
2|Page
Hayden Broadbent
S00134606
PART C
3|Page
Hayden Broadbent
S00134606
Lesson 3
Lesson 4
Lesson 5
Lesson 6
4|Page
KK2.
KK2.
KK1.
KK5, KK6.
Hayden Broadbent
S00134606
Implications of being unethical and socially
irresponsible when creating website.
Lesson 7
Lesson 8
Lesson 9
Lesson 10
Lesson 11
Lesson 12
5|Page
Hayden Broadbent
S00134606
PART D
Through the incorporation of a range of multiliterate and multimodal new media literacies (as
well as the complete restructuring of the original course based on the framework set out by
Mills and Levidos (2011) iPed (p.80)), students of this revised Year 11 Business
Management unit are ultimately provided with greater opportunities to achieve desired
learning outcomes, the new unit establishing the senses of cohesion, direction and purpose in
classroom learning lacking previously. Unlike the former outline, all Key Knowledge and
Skills required of the unit are demonstrated (and on multiple occasions), giving students the
ability to learn and reinforce these understandings. In this sense, scaffolding (Davis and
Miyake, 2004, p.266) students to achieve success in a relevant assessment task throughout the
unit places greater emphasis on learning as a process, showing how incorporated teachings
combine to help students fulfil the learning objectives at the conclusion of the unit. In
speaking of this process, The New London Groups (1996) concept of Design (p.73)
becomes particularly integral to the structure of the revised unit: through initial guided
research of real-life examples of business websites, students are able to combine use of an
Available Design (p.74) with their developing Key Knowledge and Skills to co-create (i.e.
Designing (p.75)) a new text for the consumption of others, known as the Re-designed
(p.76). Additionally, integration of Luke and Freebodys (1999) established Four Resources
Model framework into website analysis would prove beneficial for students own website
development: as code breakers, students would be required to think critically about the design
choices made by website authors; as participants of the text, inferences about the purposes of
design decisions would need to be considered by students; as text analysts, students would
attempt to understand how the text correlates to the society at large before, as text users,
using this understanding to co-create their own fictitious small business website. Thus, the
use of new media literacies (as a facilitator of this overall learning process), as well as the
6|Page
Hayden Broadbent
S00134606
theories of Multiliteracies (The New London Group, 1996, p.63), multimodality (Kress,
2005, p.1) seek, through their co-creation of fictitious small business websites, to instil a
belief in students that meaning should not be attributed to just textual elements: images,
sound, gestures and spatial relationships are just as effective in communicating meaning
(Cope and Kalantzis, 2009, p.166), a particularly important lesson for students as future
business men and women, effecting the ways in which they may interact with consumers in
future day-to-day operations.
7|Page
Hayden Broadbent
S00134606
References
Bezemer, J. and Kress, G. (2008). Writing in Multimodal Texts: A Social Semiotic Account
of Designs for Learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166-195.
Cope, B. and Kalantzis, M. (2009). Multiliteracies: New Literacies, New Learning.
Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164-195.
Davis, E. and Miyake, N. (2004). Explorations of Scaffolding in Complex Classroom
Systems. Journal of Learning Sciences, 13(3), 265-272.
Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K. and Brindley, S. (2007). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT
into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of
Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155-192.
Kress, G. (2005). Communication now and in the future. English 21. Qualifications and
Curriculum Authority.
Luke, A. and Freebody, P. (1999). A map of possible practices: Further notes on the four
resources model. Practically Primary 4(2), 5-8.
Mills, K. A., & Levido, A. (2011). iPed: Pedagogy for Digital Text Production. The Reading
Teacher, 65(1), 8091.
The New London Group. (1996). A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures.
Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.
8|Page
Hayden Broadbent
S00134606
Appendix One
Hayden Broadbent
S00134606
-
Lesson 5 &
6
Encourage note-taking.
Prompt questions at indicated
intervals throughout presentation.
Conduct class brainstorms.
Facilitate class discussions.
Apply ICT concepts to businesses of
the real world.
Lesson 7
10 | P a g e
KK6.
KS1, KS5.
Hayden Broadbent
S00134606
Lesson 8
11 | P a g e