Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Finalsocialstudieslesson2 Needsandresources 1
Finalsocialstudieslesson2 Needsandresources 1
Finalsocialstudieslesson2 Needsandresources 1
Name
Hope Darcey-Martin
Grade Level
3rd
Course Name or
Content Area
Social Studies
Context
1. This is the second lesson in a unit about human rights and water
access. The first lesson introduced human rights while this lesson
introduces natural resources, human needs and the importance of
water.
2. The long-range objectives to which this lesson contributes are
for students to understand the issues related to global and local
access to clean water and to begin to analyze how certain human
rights are respected for certain people and are not not respected for
others. Lastly, students should begin to explore ways to become
involved with social action on a local level.
3. The students for whom this lesson has been developed are in
3rd grade. It is a diverse group of 16 students. Several students have
IEPS and one student has a 1-to-1 aid. Many students need extra
support in math, writing, reading, and speech. The class has been
developing a community in which different needs are accepted.
Students are learning to honor each classmate and understand that
teachers and students all must support each other in different ways
throughout the day.
Central Focus
The central focus of the lesson is understanding the relationship between
humans and natural resources and that humans use resources to help them
survive and thrive. Students will also understand the importance of water
through a problem solving activity.
State/National Content Standards (Common Core State Standards)
Social Studies: CCSS framework conceptual understanding 3.8: The
Formative Assessments
Summati
ve
Assessme
nts
3. Understand the
importance of water as a
natural resource.
Prior Knowledge
Academic Language
Students will makes arguments during the water use group activity.
Students will speak and listen to their group members and try to determine
which product uses the most water. As I circulate among the groups I will
encourage students to explain why they made the decisions that did, for
example why do you think the pair of jeans used more water than the piece
of bread? Students will also be encouraged to ask each other these same
questions in order to come to a consensus and then share with the class.
Language demands
Language supports
Content Vocabulary:
-Natural resource,
-Human need,
-Human rights,
-Manufacturing
5
minutes
10-15
minutes
5
minutes
2
minutes
Closure 5 minutes:
11. Slide 11: Wrap up. Remind students of the objective of the day. Hand
out the exit ticket (Why is water a natural resource and a human right?).
Ask students to take 5 minutes to try and sneer the best they can. They can
add pictures to the words. Spelling and full sentences are not important for
this task.
12. Slide 12: Tell students that you will be talking about water as a natural
resource and a right further in upcoming lessons. Leave students to ponder
the following question Do you think everyone has the same access to
clean water around the world?.
Differentiation
Universal Design
Representation: Information will be accessible through various means of
representation including images, text, and video. Vocabulary is either pre
taught or added to the word wall after defined as a class. This is permanent
in the classroom and is available for students when they need it. It is
helpful for students who are absent to see what vocabulary was taught the
previous day.
Engagement:
-Students will be encouraged to think independently first but will then pair
and share and benefit from whole and small group discussion.
-Students were very engaged with the previous human right lesson. Water
is a natural resource that is crucial for all people and is therefore a topic
that is relevant for all students.
-Known attention signals are used so that everyone is clear about how and
where to transition. This minimizes distraction and confusion.
-Students in this class really enjoy small group activities and games. The
water use activity will allow them to express their opinion and listen to the
opinions of their peers.
Expression/Action:
-Students are all expected to write in the lesson but not without support
when needed. Students can write sentences or words and will always have
a model to copy from if needed. Writing is not an integral part of this
particular lesson but those who would like to write more have the
opportunity. Students are encouraged to push themselves appropriately by
being given choice. Teacher can monitor these choices and can
independently conference at a later date if there might be a discrepancy
between potential and achievement.
-Students will not be required to all orally share in front of the whole class.
Instructional Resources/Materials
-PowerPoint/Smartboard
-Worksheet
-Packets for water use activity
-Exit ticket
-Cool Drink of Water by Barbara Kerley
-White board for morning meeting question.
Lesson Reflection
I assumed that students would relate to this lesson as they did
with the previous lesson. Everyone uses natural resources and everyone
has basic needs. Water is something that is intimately important for
students since they use it every day.
The lesson didnt seem quite as engaging initially (as was the
case with the first lesson). Students participated but they were very
confused about resources at first. It may have been helpful to start with a
book or something more engaging since students did not seem ready to
have to discuss natural resources as a class until they had a little more
information. I think more time needed to be spent on resources and then
move into natural resources. A short video clip may have helped with
visuals of resources. Once the discussion began to deepen students were
able to think more critically about natural resources and use the visuals
from the the PowerPoint to help in their understanding. In fact, several
students stated that oxygen and carbon dioxide are natural resources. At
first I said that they were not considered natural resources but I asked
them to explain why they thought they were. The students response was
that it is made my nature and it help you survive. This was such an
astute observation and I admitted that yes, according to our definition
they would be natural resources. I told them that I would investigate
further.
The students were excited about the activity. Students worked
really well together in their groups with little teacher guidance. When
students feel ownership and a sense of self governance they develop
motivation to participate and engage in discussion and problem solving.
It was helpful to help them push their thinking by asking questions. This
group seems to thrive in small group work but if the topic is relevant they
can attend and participate in large discussions as well. I think its
important to have a variety of grouping throughout the day, individual,
partner, small group and large group, in order to meet everyones need
and preference. While assessing their participation in the activity I was
able to hear students really think about what needs water. Students
bounced ideas off of each other and were able to find more hidden
sources of water as a result of peer input. If did this lesson again I might
add a small written component to the activity that could act a summary
of their reasoning. Then as each group circulated to see what other
groups came up with, they could read the reasons why (one person could
read aloud for students who have difficulties reading). I think this would
allow students to learn from their peers more fully. During the lesson they
did not get to hear every groups reasoning.
Although it seemed to be an engaging lesson, it was a little
difficult to truly assess all my formative objectives. Therefore, I after
reading their exit tickets I discovered that many students had difficulties
making the connections in writing. I think some students needed more
explicit practice making the connection back to human rights before they
were asked this question. If I did this lesson again I might create a
checklist of who I heard speak in a group. If I did not hear every voice, I
could ask them myself or ask if they could write their response.
When looking back at the exit tickets I found some
misunderstandings and confusion. A few students were not able to make
the direction connection between human rights, needs, and natural
resources. However, this could be partly because of how the question
was worded or it may have been too complicated to write out in a short
period of time. I definitely would need to do some re-engagement to try
to see where the confusion lay. I think it would be helpful to have a few
students share their answers so that its not simply the teacher reteaching. Once students hear their peer models they may be able to
make their own connections between needs, resources and rights. I would
also re-read parts of the Declaration of Human Rights Article 25 that was
introduced in the previous lesson. The right says that everyone has the
right to a good life. With this additional exposure students may be able to
determine that to have a good life you must have your basic needs met.
It might also be advantageous to present a case study of a person who
does not have their basic needs met. By personalizing it students can
better connect with the human rights aspects of resources and think
about them on a deeper level more real world level.
Upon reflecting on the lesson I was left with the conviction that
when given the opportunity students can think critically about very
complicated issues and truly are scholars.
Morning Message