Connecticut's Statewide Grievance Committee released on Feb. 8 its full-length decision in an ethics case against Total Attorneys Inc., a lawyer-advertising company based in Chicago. The committee determined that lawyers participating in the company's advertising model were not paying money for the company to recommend them to potential clients, and therefore, the lawyers did not violate any ethics rules.
Connecticut's Statewide Grievance Committee released on Feb. 8 its full-length decision in an ethics case against Total Attorneys Inc., a lawyer-advertising company based in Chicago. The committee determined that lawyers participating in the company's advertising model were not paying money for the company to recommend them to potential clients, and therefore, the lawyers did not violate any ethics rules.
Original Title
Zelotes v Rousseau Et Al, 09-0412, Memorandum of Decision
Connecticut's Statewide Grievance Committee released on Feb. 8 its full-length decision in an ethics case against Total Attorneys Inc., a lawyer-advertising company based in Chicago. The committee determined that lawyers participating in the company's advertising model were not paying money for the company to recommend them to potential clients, and therefore, the lawyers did not violate any ethics rules.
Connecticut's Statewide Grievance Committee released on Feb. 8 its full-length decision in an ethics case against Total Attorneys Inc., a lawyer-advertising company based in Chicago. The committee determined that lawyers participating in the company's advertising model were not paying money for the company to recommend them to potential clients, and therefore, the lawyers did not violate any ethics rules.