Molar Flowrates, KG-MOL/HR: Comp No. Component Total Vapor 1 H2 2 Toluene 3 Benzene 4 Methane

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Problem 1 (SRK):

Product stream (vapor):

Molar Flowrates, KG-MOL/HR


Comp
No.

Component

H2

Total

Vapor
0.1147

0.1147

TOLUENE

9.6601E-04

9.6601E-04

BENZENE

0.0247

0.0247

METHANE

0.8452

0.8452

Recycle Stream (liquid):

Molar Flowrates, KG-MOL/HR


Comp
No.

Component

H2

0.2872

0.2872

TOLUENE

0.7264

0.7264

BENZENE

9.2209

9.2209

METHANE

7.4424

7.4424

Problem 2 (SRK):

Total

Liquid

Product Stream (vapor):

Molar Flowrates, KG-MOL/HR


Comp
No.

Component

H2

Total

Vapor
0.1115

0.1115

TOLUENE

9.4068E-04

9.4068E-04

BENZENE

0.0249

0.0249

METHANE

0.8413

0.8413

Recycle Stream (liquid):

Molar Flowrates, KG-MOL/HR


Comp
No.

Component

H2

0.2841

0.2841

TOLUENE

0.7020

0.7020

BENZENE

9.2454

9.2454

METHANE

7.5010

7.5010

Problem 3:

Total

Liquid

For the ideal thermodynamic package, no vapor stream was produced, so the data
is completely useless. The results from the Peng-Robinson are posted below.

Product Stream (Vapor):

Molar Flowrates, KG-MOL/HR


Comp
No.

Component

H2

Total

Vapor
0.1939

0.1939

TOLUENE

1.1025E-03

1.1025E-03

BENZENE

0.0139

0.0139

METHANE

0.4789

0.4789

Recycle Stream (Liquid):

Molar Flowrates, KG-MOL/HR


Comp
No.

Component

H2

0.4311

0.4311

TOLUENE

0.6239

0.6239

BENZENE

4.3611

4.3611

METHANE

3.8961

3.8961

Total

Liquid

One thing to note is there is much methane in the liquid stream using this package.
Note: The PFD for problems 1 and 2 has been with the extents being .5. Initially, the extents
were .63, .47, and .36, respectively.

Problem 4:

From Arrhenius Equation, the rate constant k=5.37E-5 l/gmol*s for a CTSR
Solving for V with the equation: (We know R=.148, Q r=1.48 l/s)
5(11.48)-V*k*(1.882)=11.48*1.88
V=943 m3
This seems like an awfully big tank though.

Problem 5 (Analysis):
The ideal system from assignment 5 has a final concentration of .64, while
our solution with this more realistic model has a final concentration of benzene
product of .0249. This numbers are quite different. Our system did not converge,
but if I read the results of the program correctly, we were at least close to a
converging point with regard to the errors. One of the issues that could of caused
this error was the extreme conditions the hydrogealkyation process. Temperatures
must be around 600 degrees Celsius and pressures must be with 40-60 atm. It is
very possible the conditions of the ideal system in problem 5 did not account for
this, and this can be shown in the calculation of the rate constant k done for our
simulation above. In addition, an error in the flash separator unit specifications due
to lack of knowledge about the process may very well have led to this divergence in
results.

You might also like