Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kimmel's Masculinity
Kimmel's Masculinity
qxd
3/5/2004
4:15 PM
Page 35
3
MEN, MASCULINITIES,
AND FEMINIST THEORY
JUDITH KEGAN GARDINER
03-Kimmel.qxd
3/5/2004
4:15 PM
Page 36
36 THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES
03-Kimmel.qxd
3/5/2004
4:15 PM
Page 37
03-Kimmel.qxd
3/5/2004
4:15 PM
Page 38
38 THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES
03-Kimmel.qxd
3/5/2004
4:15 PM
Page 39
03-Kimmel.qxd
3/5/2004
4:15 PM
Page 40
40 THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES
03-Kimmel.qxd
3/5/2004
4:15 PM
Page 41
03-Kimmel.qxd
3/5/2004
4:15 PM
Page 42
42 THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES
03-Kimmel.qxd
3/5/2004
4:15 PM
Page 43
03-Kimmel.qxd
3/5/2004
4:15 PM
Page 44
44 THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES
because he does not have the privilege or power
society has taught him real men should possess.
Alienated, frustrated, pissed off, he may attack,
abuse, and oppress an individual woman or
women, but he is not reaping positive benefits
from his support and perpetuation of sexist
ideology [and so is] not exercising privilege.
(hooks, 1984, p. 73)
03-Kimmel.qxd
3/5/2004
4:15 PM
Page 45
03-Kimmel.qxd
3/5/2004
4:15 PM
Page 46
46 THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES
03-Kimmel.qxd
3/5/2004
4:15 PM
Page 47
03-Kimmel.qxd
3/5/2004
4:15 PM
Page 48
48 THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES
REFERENCES
Adams, A. (1994). Letter . . . 1776. In P. Lauter (ed.),
The Heath anthology of American literature
(Vol. 1, 2nd ed., p. 876). Lexington, MA:
D. C. Heath.
Alonso, A. M. (1992). Gender, power, and historical
memory: Discourses of Serrano resistance. In
J. Butler & J. W. Scott (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 404-425). New York:
Routledge.
Anzalda, G. (2002). Foreword, 2001. In
C. Moraga & G. E. Anzalda (Eds.), This
bridge called my back: Writings by radical
women of color (pp. xxiv-xxxix). Berkeley, CA:
Third Woman Press.
Beauvoir, S. de. (1968). The second sex (Ed. and
Trans. H. M. Parshley). New York: Bantam
Books. (Original work published 1949)
Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., &
Tarule, J. M. (1986). Womens ways of knowing:
The development of self, voice, and mind.
New York: Basic Books.
Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New
Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Bersani, L. (1988). Is the rectum a grave? In
D. Crimp (Ed.), AIDS: Cultural analysis/
cultural activism (pp. 197-222). Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
Bly, R. (1990). Iron John: A book about men.
Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bordo, S. (1999). The male body: A new look at men
in public and private. New York: Farrar, Straus
and Giroux.
Boxer, M. J. (1998). When women ask the questions: Creating womens studies in America.
Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University
Press.
Braidotti, R. (2002). Cyberfeminism with a difference. In C. L. Mui & J. S. Murphy (Eds.),
Gender struggles: Practical approaches to contemporary feminism (pp. 347-357). Lanham,
MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Bulbeck, C. (1998). Re-orienting Western feminisms:
Womens diversity in a postcolonial world.
Cambridge, England: Cambridge University
Press.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the
subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories
in subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University
Press.
Cavendish, M. L. (1985). From The Convent of
Pleasure. In M. Ferguson (Ed.), First feminists:
British women writers 1578-1799 (pp. 86-101).
Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
03-Kimmel.qxd
3/5/2004
4:15 PM
Page 49
03-Kimmel.qxd
3/5/2004
4:15 PM
Page 50
50 THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES
Smuts, B. (1992). Male aggression against women:
An evolutionary perspective. Human Nature, 3,
1-44.
Stanton, E. C. (1994). Declaration of sentiments. In
P. Lauter (Ed.), The Heath anthology of
American literature (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., pp. 19461948). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
Steinem, G. (1992). Foreword. In K. L. Hagan (Ed.),
Women respond to the mens movement: A feminist collection (pp. v-ix). New York: Pandora.
Stoltenberg, John. Refusing to Be a Man: Essays on
Sex and Justice. Portland: Breitenbush Books,
1989.