The high error variance of 67.45% in Table 1 shows that more than two-thirds of the variance was unexplained by the study's design. This large error may be because the study had an unreliable or poor design that failed to account for other important systematic variables. The document appears to be discussing issues with the design of a study that failed to explain most of the observed variance.
The high error variance of 67.45% in Table 1 shows that more than two-thirds of the variance was unexplained by the study's design. This large error may be because the study had an unreliable or poor design that failed to account for other important systematic variables. The document appears to be discussing issues with the design of a study that failed to explain most of the observed variance.
The high error variance of 67.45% in Table 1 shows that more than two-thirds of the variance was unexplained by the study's design. This large error may be because the study had an unreliable or poor design that failed to account for other important systematic variables. The document appears to be discussing issues with the design of a study that failed to explain most of the observed variance.
The high error variance of 67.45% in Table 1 shows that more than two-thirds of the variance was unexplained by the study's design. This large error may be because the study had an unreliable or poor design that failed to account for other important systematic variables. The document appears to be discussing issues with the design of a study that failed to explain most of the observed variance.
45% accounted for by Error in the Table 1 indicates
that more than two-thirds of the variance was not accounted for at all in this design. This error variance may be due to unreliable variance in the study due to poor design, other systematic variables that might be of interest (if they were csnaCDN>djCN,\NC CJ ew