Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Revision Document wp2
Revision Document wp2
initial WP
submission:
(a phrase,
sentence,
paragraph,
idea, move,
punctuation,
piece of
evidence, etc.)
An observation
or question I
received from De
Piero or a
classmate:
The change(s) I
made to what I
initially wrote:
(ie, the change[s]
I made to column
1)
How this
change
impacts my
paper:
From:
This comment is in
reference to the
whole paragraph:
By doing so, I
will not be
overwhelming
the reader with
a jumble of
words that
explains certain
aspects of
things.
For the
biological
approach, a
publication from
the Pigment
Cell Research
has a certain
style to
introduce the
Pretend your whole
paper is a big, juicy
evolution of skin steak. Do you
want your reader
to enjoy that steak
pigmentation.
in easy-to-chew,
digestable bites?
Or do you want
them to start
eating the whole
thing in one piece
(think: zombie).
subject of
argument in little,
digestable, oneidea-at-a-time bits.
Readers need to be
able to see the
different
parts/pieces/bites
of the argument
that theyre
chewing on.
(The whole
paper)
Young, Im
wondering if your
paper would
benefit from restructuring the
organization.
Instead of
Source #1
Source #2
Source #3
Could your
paper/argument
unfold a more
integrated/interwo
ven way if you did
something like:
Idea #1 (sources 1,
2, 3)
Idea #2 (sources 1,
2, 3)
Idea #3 (sources 1,
Ive tried to
reorganize my
paper to see if it
flowed better
when I matched
certain ideas.
Before, most of
the paragraphs
were long and
overwhelming
and did not
really seemed
organized, but
now, I hope it is
easier for the
reader to read
and does not
have to be lost
in all of the
wordiness of
this piece.
2, 3)?
Whole paper