The Miranda Rights originated from the 1966 Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court case. The case established that suspects in police custody must be informed of their right to remain silent and their right to an attorney before being questioned. Specifically, suspects must be told "you have the right to remain silent, anything you say can be used against you in court, you have the right to an attorney, and if you cannot afford an attorney one will be provided to you." The Miranda Rights are also enshrined in the 1987 Philippine Constitution to protect individuals from self-incrimination during police investigations.
The Miranda Rights originated from the 1966 Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court case. The case established that suspects in police custody must be informed of their right to remain silent and their right to an attorney before being questioned. Specifically, suspects must be told "you have the right to remain silent, anything you say can be used against you in court, you have the right to an attorney, and if you cannot afford an attorney one will be provided to you." The Miranda Rights are also enshrined in the 1987 Philippine Constitution to protect individuals from self-incrimination during police investigations.
The Miranda Rights originated from the 1966 Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court case. The case established that suspects in police custody must be informed of their right to remain silent and their right to an attorney before being questioned. Specifically, suspects must be told "you have the right to remain silent, anything you say can be used against you in court, you have the right to an attorney, and if you cannot afford an attorney one will be provided to you." The Miranda Rights are also enshrined in the 1987 Philippine Constitution to protect individuals from self-incrimination during police investigations.
Rights? You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you. Do you understand the rights I have just read to you?
What is the origin of the Miranda
Rights Miranda v. Arizona (1966) established that a suspect has the right to remain silent and that prosecutors may not use statements made by defendants while in police custody unless the police have advised them of their rights.
Miranda vs Arizona (1966)
In 1963, Miranda was arrested for the armed robbery of a bank worker. While in custody of police, Miranda - who had a record for armed robbery, attempted rape, assault and burglary -signed a written confession to the armed robbery. He also confessed to kidnapping and raping an 18-year-old girl 11 days prior to the robbery. Miranda was convicted of the armed robbery, but his attorneys appealed the case on the grounds that Miranda did not understand that he had the right against self-incrimination.
What is the basis of the Miranda
Rights? Section 12, Art. III of the 1987 Constitution 1.Any person under investigation for the commission of an offense shall have the right to be informed of his right to remain silent and to have competent and independent counsel preferably of his own choice. If the person cannot afford the services of counsel, he must be provided with one. These rights cannot be waived except in writing and in the presence of counsel.
2.No torture, force, violence,
threat, intimidation, or any other means which vitiate the free will shall be used against him. Secret detention places, solitary, incommunicado, or other similar forms of detention are prohibited.
3.Any confession or admission obtained in
violation of this or Section 17 hereof shall be inadmissible in evidence against him. Section 17. No person shall be compelled to be a witness against himself. Also known as The Right against SelfIncrimination
4.The law shall provide for
penal and civil sanctions for violations of this Section as well as compensation to the rehabilitation of victims of torture or similar practices, and their families.
What is the right to adequate legal assistance?
The right to adequate legal
assistance is also known as the right to counsel. This means that someone who has been charged with a crime, must be provided with an attorney even if they cannot afford one.