Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 20 views

    2015-06-11 State of Israel v Malka et al (28759-05-15) in the Jerusalem District Court - Request for Due Process// מדינת ישראל נ מלכה ואח' (28759-05-15) - בקשה להליך הוגן

    Uploaded by

    Human Rights Alert - NGO (RA)
    The requester filed a request to inspect documents in a court case on June 10, 2015. When he checked the online system, the decision on his request was not registered, though he was told a decision was made. He is concerned the court is maintaining double records and not properly registering decisions. He requests the court properly register the decision on his inspection request and any future decisions, and order parties to serve their responses to his request on him.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    2015-06-11 State of Israel v Malka et al (28759-05-15) in the Jerusalem District Court - Request for Due Process// מדינת ישראל נ מלכה ואח' (28759-05-15) - בקשה להליך הוגן

    Uploaded by

    Human Rights Alert - NGO (RA)
    20 views5 pages
    The requester filed a request to inspect documents in a court case on June 10, 2015. When he checked the online system, the decision on his request was not registered, though he was told a decision was made. He is concerned the court is maintaining double records and not properly registering decisions. He requests the court properly register the decision on his inspection request and any future decisions, and order parties to serve their responses to his request on him.

    Original Description:

    a

    Original Title

    2015-06-11 State of Israel v Malka et al (28759-05-15) in the Jerusalem District Court – Request for Due Process// מדינת ישראל נ מלכה ואח' (28759-05-15) – בקשה להליך הוגן

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The requester filed a request to inspect documents in a court case on June 10, 2015. When he checked the online system, the decision on his request was not registered, though he was told a decision was made. He is concerned the court is maintaining double records and not properly registering decisions. He requests the court properly register the decision on his inspection request and any future decisions, and order parties to serve their responses to his request on him.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    20 views5 pages

    2015-06-11 State of Israel v Malka et al (28759-05-15) in the Jerusalem District Court - Request for Due Process// מדינת ישראל נ מלכה ואח' (28759-05-15) - בקשה להליך הוגן

    Uploaded by

    Human Rights Alert - NGO (RA)
    The requester filed a request to inspect documents in a court case on June 10, 2015. When he checked the online system, the decision on his request was not registered, though he was told a decision was made. He is concerned the court is maintaining double records and not properly registering decisions. He requests the court properly register the decision on his inspection request and any future decisions, and order parties to serve their responses to his request on him.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 5

    []

    JerusalemDistrictCourt

    StateofIsraelvMalkaetal
    Requester:

    287590515

    JosephZernik,PhD

    Human Rights Alert - NGO


    PO Box 33407, Tel-Aviv
    Email: joseph.zernik@hra-ngo.org
    Fax: 077-3179186

    RequestforDueProcess,inre:MyJune10,2015RequesttoInspect
    I,theundersigned,JosephZernik,filehereinmyRequestforDueProcess,inre:
    MyJune10,2015RequesttoInspectinstantcourtfile:
    1.OnJune10,2015,IfiledmyRequesttoInspectininstantcourtfile.[1]
    2.SincetheonlinepublicaccesssysteminNetHaMishpatprovidesnoaccessto
    requestsandotherpapers,filedbyparties,IcontactedlateronJune10,2015,
    theOnlineChatrepresentative(operatingunderdisclaimer)tofindoutthe
    dispositionofmyrequest.Iwasinformed:a)ThatmyRequesttoInspectwas
    registeredasRequestNo15,andb)thatDecisionwasrenderedonit.Iwas
    alsoprovidedwithacopyoftheJune10,2015"PostitDecision",whichsays:
    "ForresponsebytheProsecutionandDefendants'counselbyJune21,2015."

    June 10, 2015 "Post-it Decision", as received from the "Online Chat" representative.

    ___
    3. AfterreceivingtheJune10,2015"PostitDecision",Iinspectedtheelectronic
    courtfileinNetHaMishpat,ITaccesssystemoftheCourt.Thetotalnumberof
    records,listedinthe"DecisionsDocket"wasone(1)(pertainingtohearing
    date),andtheabovementioned"PostitDecision"wasnotlistedinit.Given
    thatmyRequesttoInspectisRequestNo15,itislikelythatthereareother
    1/5
    '

    decisions,hiddenfrompublicaccessaswell.

    "Decisions Docket" in instant court file on June 10, 2015, 15:14. Only one (1) decision record is listed,
    dated May 21, 2015.

    ____
    4. Instantcourtfileislistedas"opentothepublic"i.e.,itisunsealed,andthere
    isnoknownprohibitiononpublicationoftherecordsininstantcourtfile.
    Therefore,thefailuretolistcourtdecisionsinthepublicaccesssystemis
    incomprehensible.
    5.Inanothercourtfile,StateofIsraelvZerni(102910112)intheTelAviv
    DistrictCourt(pertainingtotheHolylandcorruptionscandal),thecourt
    maintaineddoubledockets,withonlysome60decisionsinthepublic
    DecisionsDocket,whileover260decisionswerelistedintheCourt'sown
    "DecisionsDocket".InStateofIsraelvZerni,dulymadeverdictandsentencing
    records,pertainingtoformerPrimeMinisterEhudOlmert,areyettobe
    discovered...
    6.Therefore,thefailuretoregistertheabovementioned"PostitDecision"raises
    concernsthattheCourtmaintainsdoublebooksystemininstantcourtfileas
    well.
    7.RequestforDueRegistration:Therefore,IhereinrequestthattheCourtduly
    registertheabovementionedJune10,2015"PostitDecision"andotherfuture
    2/5
    '

    decisions,pertainingtomyRequesttoInspect.
    8.RequestforServicebypartiesoftheirresponsesonme:Givenmyexperiencein
    requeststoinspectinothercourtfiles,IhereinrequestthattheCourtorderthe
    partiestoserveonmetheirresponsesoninstantRequesttoInspect.
    9.RequestfortimetofileRequestforLeavetoFileReply:TheCourtisherein
    requestedtoprovideme7daysafterJune21,2015,fortimetofileRequestfor
    LeavetoFileReply,incaseIchoosetodoso.
    10.RequestforDueServiceoftheCourt'sDecisions:TheCourtisherein
    requestedtoserveonmeitsdecisionsbycertifiedmail,orbyfaxwith
    accompanyingauthenticationlettersbytheOfficeoftheClerk.
    TheCourtshouldabidebyprovisionsofthelawoftheStateofIsraelandthe
    fundamentalsofDueProcessandHumanRightsinthismatter.
    Today,June11,2015

    ______________
    JosephZernik,PhDRequester

    ______________
    ,
    287590515

    '
    ' :

    HumanRightsAlertNGO
    ",33407"
    joseph.zernik@hrango.org:"
    0773179186:

    .2015,10
    10,,,
    :,2015,
    [1].,2015,10 .1
    .2
    ,2015,10,
    .,()"'"
    (,15'(:
    ,2015,10"",.
    ."21.6.15""":

    3/5
    '

    ""10,2015,"'".

    ___
    .3""10,2015,
    ."
    ")(1)(,"""
    .',15,
    .

    "",10..15:14,2015,(1)

    4/5
    '

    21.2015,
    ______

    .4"",
    .,
    .
    .5,(102910112)")
    (,
    ".60"",
    ""260.
    ,
    ,.
    .6,"""
    .
    .7:,""10
    ,2015,
    .
    .8:,

    .
    .9:
    721,2015,
    ,.
    .10:

    )(.

    .
    11,,2015,

    _______________
    ',
    :
    [1]20150610StateofIsraelvMalkaetal(287590515)intheJerusalem
    DistrictCourtRequesttoInspectcourtfile//
    '(287590515)
    https://www.scribd.com/doc/268189896/

    5/5
    '

    You might also like