Journal of

computer-mediated
COMMUNICATION
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Creative Strategies in Viral Advertising: An

Application of Taylors Six-Segment
Message Strategy Wheel
Guy J. Golan, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Communication
Seton Hall University
400 South Orange Avenue
South Orange, NJ 07079

Lior Zaidner
Graduate Student
University Of Westminster
42 Burnley Road, Willesden Green
London, NW10 1EJ, UK

Based on a computer mediated word of mouth approach, viral advertising represents

the latest online advertising phenomenon. The current study provides one of the first
empirical investigations of viral advertising. It uses Taylors six-segment message strategy wheel as a theoretical framework. A content analysis of 360 viral ads revealed that
advertisers predominantly based their message strategies on an individual ego oriented
appeals that were based on such themes as humor and sexuality.
doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00426.x

Introduction

The diffusion of high speed Internet along with the wide scale penetration of bandwidth into American and Western European homes has changed the nature of online
advertising. Where once limited to such online advertising formats as banners,
interstitials, and pop-ups, advertisers are now able to disseminate high-resolution
advertisements once exclusive to the medium of television via the World Wide Web.
This penetration of high-speed communications infrastructure in to the homes
of consumers gave birth to a new format of word of mouth advertising via computer
moderated channels. The latest and newest of the online word of mouth advertising
techniques is known as viral advertising. Viral advertising does not relate to the
dissemination of computer viruses to users nor does it relate to spam e-mail advertising. Rather, viral advertising refers to an advertising technique in which video
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (2008) 959972 2008 International Communication Association

959

advertisements are distributed from one user to another via e-mail forwarding. This
strategy is unique from almost any other online advertising formats as consumers
receive ads from friends rather than from the advertisers themselves. In addition,
consumers view ads at their convenience as they choose the time and place to open
and view the ads. This is contrary to the highly obtrusive and often annoying online
advertising formats, such as pop-ups and interstitials, which researchers found to be
perceived negatively by consumers (Burns and Lutz, 2004).
While viral advertising is still in its relative infancy, it is in no way limited to
smaller advertisers. Rather, several leading Fortune 500 advertisers have taken to viral
advertising as a method for reaching audiences. These include but are not limited to
Burger King, Anheuser-Busch, Volvo, Microsoft, and Long John Silvers (Howard,
2005).
The current study provides one of the first empirical investigations of viral
advertising. The study attempts to identify and highlight the main advertising
appeals in creative strategies in viral advertising. Such knowledge will be beneficial
to better understand the very nature of this new and unique online advertising
medium. The study applies Taylors (1999) six-segment message strategy wheel as
a tool for analyzing viral ads. Taylors model is applicable to viral advertising based
on the highly creative strategies on which all viral advertising strategies are based.
Literature Review
WOM Online
For decades, communication scholars have researched what perhaps may be the
oldest and most established advertising technique- word of mouth advertising
(WOM). Traditionally, WOM has been defined as the Oral, person to person
communication between receiver and a communicator whom the receiver perceives
as noncommercial, concerning a brand, a product or a service (Arndt, 1967, p. 3).
However, the emergence of the Internet along with broadband capabilities have
opened the door to the emergence of a new WOM advertising platform in which
individuals communicate about a brand, product or service in a nonoral manner but
rather through a computer-mediated communication (CMC) environment.
Nyilasy (2005) argued that the introduction of WOM into the CMC environment presents a major challenge to scholars who must redefine WOM as it enters
into the realm of online communication. Examples of online WOM communication
include chat rooms, instant messaging, listservs, webpages and consumer forums.
The World Wide Web presents individuals as well as advertisers with a wide array of
communication platforms for the promotion of their products or services.
As originally identified and coined as a phenomenon that extends way beyond
simply network-enhanced word-of-mouth viral marketing has changed the very
nature of online WOM (Jurvetson, 2000).
Indeed several scholars have pointed to the emergence of the eWOM or Word of
Mouse phenomenon whereas new communication platforms enhanced and
960

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (2008) 959972 2008 International Communication Association

occasionally transform the very nature of world of mouth communication via the
Internet and the World Wide Web (Helm, 2000; Hennig-Thurau et al. 2004).
The current study will focus on one of the newest and perhaps more controversial
methods of WOM advertising on the Internet- Viral Advertising.
As an off shoot of viral marketing, viral advertising is a new and emerging
advertising technique that is now widely applied by such major advertisers as
Volvo Burger King, Anheuser-Busch, and Microsoft. While the concepts of
viral marketing and viral advertising are in many ways similar, they are indeed
different.
As noted by Porter and Golan (2006), there is much confusion about the definition of viral marketing as both professionals and scholars use the terms viral
marketing, stealth marketing, buzz marketing and viral advertising interchangeably.
Helm (2000) described viral marketing as a communication and distribution concept that relies on customers to transmit digital products via electronic mail to other
potential customers in their social sphere and to animate these contacts to also
transmit the products (p. 159). Welker (2002) described viral marketing as strategies that allow an easier, accelerated, and cost-reduced transmission of messages by
creating environments for an self-replicating, exponentially increasing diffusion,
spiritualization, and impact of the message (p. 4).
Kaikati and Kaikati (2004) described the practice of viral stealth marketing, as
a marketers attempt to fly below the consumers radar by recruiting brand
pushers to pose as consumers. They go on to explain that, by generating word
of mouth to create authentic experiences, viral marketing attempts to harness the
strongest of all consumer triggersthe personal recommendation. (p. 9).
Essentially, it could be argued that viral marketing refers to a broad array of
online WOM strategies designed to encourage both online and peer-to-peer communication about a brand, product or service. As online communication platforms
will continue to evolve and develop the nature of peer-to-peer online communication,
so will the very definition of viral marketing continue to evolve.
Viral Advertising
The introduction of online viral advertising resulted from the penetration of broadband high-speed Internet connections to homes all around the globe during the early
years of the past decade. Recognizing the overwhelming success of such viral marketing campaigns as the Hotmail campaign, advertising executives identified the
low-cost opportunities afforded by the e-mail based peer-to-peer communication
platform. While it is not clear whether viral advertising was initiated by advertising
professionals or initially resulted from enthusiastic viewers who wanted to share
entertaining advertisements with their friends, viral advertising clearly transformed
the very nature of online advertising by removing the media buying element out of
the process.
As noted by Porter and Golan (2006), viral advertising is different than viral
marketing. While the former refers to a comprehensive marketing strategy that may
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (2008) 959972 2008 International Communication Association

961

include several components in it, viral advertising refers to a specific online advertising technique.
Essentially, viral advertising refers to an online advertising distribution method
that relies of word of mouth distribution via email or social network platforms as
the means of reaching target audiences. This dependence on the users willingness
to distribute content to peers may not only be influenced by the source of the
message but also by its content (Chiu et al, 2007), Subsequently, it appears that the
method of distribution may influence the nature of the viral content (Phelps et al.
2004).
Television Advertising vs. Viral Advertising

Two major factors differentiate between viral advertising and television advertising.
First, viral advertising does not require any media buying. Whereas television advertising is based on media planning and buying, viral advertising is based on an initial
seeding of an advertisement to a database of voluntary e-mail recipients (people who
requested to be included in the e-mail list of viral ad agencies) and the consequent
distribution of these ads by recipients who may or may not wish to share the ad with
their friends.
A second difference between television ads and viral ads can be identified in
the nature of the ad itself. Television ads often base their effectiveness on repetition. Thus many ads that are not entertaining and might even be annoying (for
example used car ads) are often successful thanks to continuous exposure. Viral
ads enjoy no such luxury since they are distributed via e-mail messages. Since
no user is likely to forward a boring advertisement to a friend, the ad must
include a viral component in it, a component that makes any ad forwardable
from one user to another. This viral component is referred to in both professional
and academic research of viral marketing as the Meme (Dawkins, 1976; Godin,
2001).
In one of the first empirical examinations of viral advertising, Porter and Golan
(2006) analyzed more than 500 advertisements that included more than 250 viral ads
in an attempt to identify the differences in the nature of ads content across media.
The authors found that most viral advertisements included one or more of the
following advertising appeals: sexuality, humor, violence, or nudity. These could
be identified as the meme components of these viral ads. Porter and Golan
(2006) identified differences in the use of advertising appeals not only across media
(television versus viral) but also across industry. They found that certain advertisers
were more likely to use certain advertising appeals in viral ads than others. One of the
main contributions of the Porter and Golan (2006) study was their attempt to provide one of the first academic definitions of viral advertising. They defined viral
advertising in the following manner:

962

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (2008) 959972 2008 International Communication Association

Viral advertising is unpaid peer-to-peer communication of provocative content

originating from an identified sponsor using the Internet to persuade or influence an
audience to pass along the content to others.
The current study will attempt to advance knowledge of what viral advertising by
incorporating this line of research into a broader advertising perspective that is based
on Taylors model of advertising strategies (1999). At the heart of any viral marketing
or advertising campaign stands that viral factor known as the meme variable that is
essential for any viral campaign (Dawkins, 1967) and that ultimately leads users to
share content with friends and online communities (see Chiu et al. 2007). The
current study employs Taylors six-segment message strategy wheel (Taylor, 1999)
as the framework for the deconstruction of viral ads in an attempt to better recognize
their underlying advertising creative strategies.
Taylors Six-Segment Message Strategy Wheel
Research into advertising creative strategies has yielded a basic classification of
advertisements as either informational or transformational. While the former refers
to ads that appeal to ones cognition or logic, the latter refers to ads that appeal to
consumers emotions or senses (Puto and Wells, 1984). Moving beyond this dichotomous taxonomy, Taylor (1999) introduced the six-segment message strategy wheel
as a model for analyzing advertisements. Consistent with previous research, Taylor
identifies two basic advertising approaches, the transmission view (similar to the
informational approach) and the ritual view (similar to the transformational
approach). Taylors model moves beyond the dichotomous approach to advertising
as he identified three subcategories within each of the two dimensions thus offering
a more sophisticated tool for analyzing advertising messages.
According to Taylors six-segment model, the transmission view is composed of
three segments: ration, acute need, and routine, while the ritual view is composed of
the ego, social, and sensory segments. It is important to note that under Taylors
model, advertisers may select either a single advertising approach (for example, ego)
or a combination of approaches (for example, ego and sensory).
The Transmission View
The ration segment of Taylors model is based on consumers need for information.
According to Taylor (1999) the role of communication in this segment is to inform
and persuade (based on logic). Examples of products that are typically advertised
using the ration approach include computers and cars.
The acute need segment of Taylors model is largely based on consumers immediate needs. Here, consumers are limited on time and the advertiser attempt to build
brand recognition and familiarity. Examples of products that are typically advertised
using the acute need approach include replacement parts such as batteries or tires.
The final segment under the transmission half of Taylors model is routine. This
segment refers to an advertising approach that stresses the role of a product in
a consumers routine. Taylor (1999) identifies this segment as one that has a duel
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (2008) 959972 2008 International Communication Association

963

role of both providing consumers with cues on why the product will satisfy their
needs and the role of reminding the consumers to continue purchase in order to
establish and maintain the brand consumption habit. Examples of products that
may be advertised using the ritual approach include coffee, cereal, and household
products.
The Ritual View
The ego segment of Taylors model refers to the advertising strategy in which a brand
or a company appeals to consumers egos. Here, the role of communication is to
show how the product appeals to individuals perceptions of whom they are (or
whom they want to be). This strategy is largely based on individual needs for respect
or recognition through consumption. Examples of products that may be advertised
using the ego strategy are luxury watches, cars, or publications such as the Wall Street
Journal or The Economist.
The social segment of Taylor models shifts away from the individual and towards
the collective. Here, the role of advertising is to place the consumption of a product
within a social situation. This advertising strategy introduces another person into the
purchasing decision. Examples of products that may be advertised using the social
strategy are jewelry, greeting cards, holiday gifts, etc.
The final segment under Taylors ritual view is the sensory segment. Within this
segment, advertisers appeal to consumers senses of smell, touch, hearing, taste, or
sight. Any advertising messages that directly appeals to consumers senses will fall
under this segment. Examples of such products are any food or beverage products
along with household products and cellular phones.
Since first introduced by Taylor in 1999, the six-segment message strategy wheel
was tested by several scholars as a tool for analyzing advertising strategies. Hwang,
McMillain, and Lee (2003) used Taylors model for the analysis of 160 corporate
websites. The authors found that routine was the most widely used message strategy
in corporate websites followed by ego, ration, and the social strategies. Furthermore,
the researchers found that high-revenue companies used the transformational strategy more often than low-revenue companies.
Kim, McMillian, and Hwang (2005) applied Taylors model to the study of Super
Bowl advertisements. Their study was based on a content analysis of a total of 55 ads
aired during Super Bowl XXXVII (January, 2003). In addition, they also analyzed the
websites for all 40 national advertisers that ran ads during the Super Bowl. Their
research findings indicated that there were no significant differences in the application of the six different strategies across media with the exception of the use of the
sensory strategy which was used more extensively in television ads than in websites.
Taylor (2005) offered another empirical test of his model. The author analyzed
81 reports of message strategy changes as reported in Advertising Age between 2001
2003. He applied the message strategy wheel as a tool for analyzing these changes in
message strategies. His results indicated that ego, sensory, and ration accounted for
the majority of the original strategies as well as the majority of the new strategies. In
964

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (2008) 959972 2008 International Communication Association

addition he found that that the majority of message strategy changes ranged across
the wheel from the ritual to the transmission segments and vice versa.
Cunningham and Jenner (2003) integrated Taylors six segment message strategy
wheel into political science research. The authors introduce an integrated communication model which they argue can be applied for understanding political communication processing and political decision making.
The current study will apply Taylors six-segment strategy wheel in the analysis of
viral advertisements. This application is based on the highly creative nature of the
viral ads in which the meme serves as the driving engine of the online word of mouth
distribution of these web exclusive advertisements. The study will attempt to add to
the scholarship on Taylors model by providing one of the first empirical analyses of
the model in regards to online advertising. In addition, it will attempt to better
identify the nature of viral ads and their meme factor that may provide media
scholars with a better understanding of this new advertising medium. Based on
the seminal study on viral advertising by Porter and Golan (2006) and based on
previous studies on Taylors six-segment message strategy wheel, the current study
will present the following research questions:
RQ#1: What advertising appeals were most frequently used in viral advertisements?
RQ#2: What were the advertising functions of the viral ads?
RQ#3: Do viral advertisements base their creative message strategies on the ritual strategy
more than they do on the transmission message strategy?
RQ#4: Which of six segments on Taylors wheel were most commonly used in viral
advertisements?
RQ#5: Did different product categories use different messages strategies in viral ads?

Methods

To better understand the nature of the advertising appeals and creative strategies in
viral advisements, the current study conducted a content analysis of 360 viral ads.
The ads represented a convenience sample that was gathered from two leading U.S.
based, viral advertising-seeding Web sites (www.culture-buzz.com, www.metacafe.
com, http://blog.unrulymedia.com) as well as ads from a database of a leading European viral advertising firm (www.ketaketa.com). These ads represent a sample of
viral advertisements that were widely viewed and distributed through e-mail and
social networks by Internet audiences between 2004 and 2006. The use of a convenience sample rather than a random sample was based on the lack of a comprehensive
database or source that gathers vial ads. Unlike more established advertising media
such as television, radio or out of home, viral advertising is relatively new and thus
archives are still not widely available. Each of the 360 viral advertisements was coded
for the following variables:

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (2008) 959972 2008 International Communication Association

965

Name-The name of the ad

The industry related to the advertisers- was this a product or service related to
the following industries: a not-for-profit organization, fashion, food and beverage,
travel, communication and electronics, household products, pharmaceuticals, alcohol and tobacco, entertainment and media, banking, insurance or finance, automotive, or other.
Ad function- Was the ads primary purpose branding, call for action or to provide information about the product or service.
Advertising appeal- a series of advertising appeals were coded as dichotomous
variables signifying that an ad used the appeal or did not use the appeal, these
included humor, sexuality, violence, the use of animals and the use of children in
the ad. This coding was based on the Porter and Golan (2006) study.
Creative strategy (macro)- was the ad based on a ritual view, transmission view,
or a combination of the two.
Creative strategy (micro)- a serious of advertising strategies based on Taylors
six-segment strategy wheel were coded in a dichotomous manner indicating that
a strategy was used or not used in the ad, these included ration, acute need, routine,
ego, sensory and social. These represent the six strategy segments of Taylors model
(1999).
In order to ensure intercoder reliability a second coder recoded 10% of the ads. A
combined alpha score of .83 was calculated using the Holsi method (1969) indicating
a satisfactory level of intercoder reliability.
Results

The current study is of an exploratory nature. It represents one of the first empirical
investigations of the viral advertising phenomenon. Through a content analysis of
360 viral advertisements, the study attempts to highlight the viral component in the
ads by identifying the main advertising appeals employed by advertisers. Research
Question number one asked what advertising appeals were most frequently used in
viral advertisements?
Table 1 indicates that humor was by far the most commonly utilized advertising
appeal in the viral ads as it was incorporated in 91% of the ads. Sexuality was the

Table 1 Appeals used in viral Advertisements (n = 360)

Advertising Appeal

Frequency

Percentage

Humor
Sexuality
Violence
Children
Animals

328
101
52
46
64

91%
28.1%
14.4%
12.8%
17.8%

966

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (2008) 959972 2008 International Communication Association

second most common advertising appeal as it was used in more than 28% of viral
ads. These advertising appeals were followed by the use of animals in ads (17.8%),
violence (14.4%) and the use of children (12.8%) of all viral ads in the current
analysis.
Research question number two asked what were the advertising functions in the
viral ads? Thus, we examined if the primary functions of the viral ads was branding,
call for action or to provide information? The results in Table 2 indicate that the
primary ad function in the viral ads was branding (70%) followed by providing
information (15.3%) and call for action (14.8%). As suggested by Table 2, ad branding was identified as the key ad function of viral ads by the Porter and Golan (2006)
study.
The current study is the first study to employ Taylors six-segment strategy
wheel model (1999) as a tool for analyzing viral advertising. As discussed in the
literature review, Taylors model suggests that all creative advertising are based on
either the transmission view, the ritual view or a combination of the two.
Research question number three asked if viral advertisements based their creative
message strategies on the ritual view more than they did on the transmission
message view?
The results in Table 3 indicate that the ritual view was by far dominant over the
transmission view as the formal was used in 58.3% of the ads and the latter was used
in 23% of the ads. A combination of the two views was employed in 18.6% of the
viral ads.
As outlined by Taylors model (1999), the creative strategy wheel is defined by the
transmission and ritual views that are further divided into six separate segments. The
ritual view is composed of the ego, social and sensory segments while the transmission is composed of the ration, acute need, and routine segments. Research
question number four asked which of six segments on Taylors wheel were most
commonly employed in viral advertisements.
The results in Table 4 display the results of the analysis indicating that ego was
the most common message strategy in viral ads accounting for 51% of total viral ads.
Ration was the second most common strategy with 24.4% of the ads. The acute
need strategy (16.4%) and the social strategy (16.1%) were also commonly used in
viral ads.
The results indicate that sensory (1.6%) and routine (1.4%) were rarely
employed strategies in viral advertisements.

Table 2 Advertising function in viral advertisements

Advertising Function

Current Study n = 360

Porter & Golan (2006) n = 266

Branding
Call for action
Provide information

252 (70%)
53 (14.8%)
55 (15.3%)

224 (84%)
10 (4%)
32 (12%)

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (2008) 959972 2008 International Communication Association

967

Table 3 Ritual vs. Transmission views

Transmission View
Ritual View
Combination
Total

Frequency

percentage

83
210
67
360

23%
58.3%
18.6%
100%

Table 4 Taylors six segment strategies in viral ads (n = 360)

Ration
Acute need
Routine
Ego
Social
Sensory

Frequency

percentage

88
59
5
184
58
6

24.4%
16.4%
1.4%
51%
16.1%
1.6%

The final research question in the study (RQ #5) asked if different product
categories use different messages strategies in viral advertisements? The results in
Table 5 indicate that such indeed was the case. Viral advertisements for some of the
product categories based their creative strategies on the ritual view more predominantly than on the transmission view. The ritual view was more widely used in the
fashion (84.6%), alcohol and tobacco (82%), food and beverage (66.6%), entertainment and media (65.3%), and automotive (64.1%) product categories.
A combination of the ritual and transmission views was common in the travel
(50%), banking (50%) and non for profit (41.6%) product categories. The only
product categories that were relatively evenly balanced between the ritual and transmission views were the electronic and communications (46.7%, 36.3%), other
(44.7%, 39.5%) and household products (50%, 35.7%) product categories.
Discussion

The penetration of high-speed Internet infrastructure into consumers homes during

the early part of the decade changed the very nature of online advertising. With the
ability to watch 30-plus-second advertisements at high quality resolution, consumers
are not only the end users of online advertising but can also play a role as essential
players in the distribution of the ads. The birth of viral advertising has changed the
very nature of online advertising as media planners and buyers are made obsolete by
the will of consumers to forward ads via email to their friends, family and colleges.
As a relatively new advertising phenomenon, viral advertising has received limited attention from mass communication scholars. The current study attempted to
968

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (2008) 959972 2008 International Communication Association

Table 5 Ritual vs. Transmission views across product categories

Industry

Ritual

Transmission

Combination

Total

NPO
Fashion
Food & Beverage
Travel
Electronic & Communications
Household products
Pharmaceuticals
Alcohol & Tobacco
Entertainment & Media
Banking
Automotive
Other
Total

41.6% (5)
84.6% (11)
66.6% (36)
33.3% (2)
46.7% (31)
50% (7)
46.8% (15)
82% (41)
65.3% (17)
30% (3)
64.1% (25)
44.7% (17)
58.3% (210)

16.6% (2)
15.4% (2)
7.4% (4)
16.6%(1)
36.3% (24)
35.7% (5)
25% (8)
4% (2)
23.2% (6)
20% (2)
30.7% (12)
39.5% (15)
23% (83)

41.6% (5)
0% (0)
25.9%(14)
50% (3)
16.6% (11)
14.3% (2)
28.2% (9)
14% (7)
11.5% (3)
50% (5)
5.1% (2)
15.8% (6)
18.6% (66)

100% (12)
100% (13)
100% (54)
100% (6)
100% (66)
100% (14)
100% (32)
100% (50)
100% (26)
100% (10)
100% (39)
100% (38)
100% (360)

fill in the tapestry on viral advertising research by providing one of the first empirical
investigations of this new online advertising phenomenon.
The study content analyzed 360 viral advertisements in an attempt to understand
the creative advertising appeals and strategies used in viral ads. The study employed
Taylors (1999) six-segment message strategy wheel as a model for this investigation.
Study results point to several key finding. The first was that humor and sexuality
were the main advertising appeals used in viral ads. This finding is consistent with
Porter and Golans (2006) study that found that humor and sexuality were the
predominant advertising appeals used in viral advertising. These finding point to
both of these advertising appeals as the main meme factors that make viral ads
viral. That is, consumers are entertained or moved enough by advertisements
based on humor and sexuality that they chose to forward these ads via email to their
friends and colleagues.
The studys results also shed some light on the general nature of viral advertisements as vehicles for branding campaigns. The results indicate that the majority of
viral ads were designed for branding rather than calling for action or the dissemination of product or brand information. Again, the results are consistent with
Porter and Golans (2006) study that found branding to be the key function of viral
ads. These results indicate that at present, advertising practitioners view viral
advertising as primarily useful for branding. However, as the viral advertising
phenomenon will further develop, practitioners may find ways to use viral ads as
vehicles leading to user action. One may argue that the Moveon.org campaign was
effective in encouraging voter registration and turnout during the 2004 U.S. presidential campaign.
As noted, the current study applied and tested Taylors six-segment strategy
wheel as a model for the analysis of viral ads. The results of the study indicate that
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (2008) 959972 2008 International Communication Association

969

viral ads were primarily designed around the ritual view as a whole and across
product categories. The results also indicated that most viral ads employed the
ego strategy accounting for more than 50% of total ads. Viral ads were not absent
of the transmission view approach as nearly a quarter of the viral advertisements
employed the ration strategy. When synthesized with the results of the advertising
appeal results, one could argue that viral ads were often based on an individual
appeal (ego rather than social) that was based largely on humor while attempting
to provide some information to the user.
This strategy may be a function of the advertising format rather than the
nature of the advertisers. Based on McLuhans (1964) assertion that the medium
is the message, it could be argued that the creative/message strategy of any viral ad
will be largely determined by its meme factor. Since the success of any viral
advertising campaign is based on the willingness of users to forward messages
(ads) to as many people as possible, advertisers must shy away from boring fact
based strategies and towards more entertaining, exciting or interesting attention
grabbing strategies.
The application of Taylors model as a model for the analysis of creative advertising strategies proved useful as the six segments provided an in-depth understanding of how advertisers framed their messages in an attempt to reach audiences. In the
case of the current study, the model was useful in demonstrating that viral ads were
not only based on the ritual view but that they mostly approached the consumer
from an ego-based approach that is based on the individual rather than the social.
The results of the current study provide empirical evidence to this approach as
they clearly highlight the predominance of the ritual view strategy over the transmission view. In layman terms, it could be argued that viral advertising strategies
target users through the gut rather than the brain. The prominence of this approach
will likely advance rather than wane. Viral advertising competes daily with thousands
of video clips that are user generated rather than professionally produced. The
millions of hits that such user generated videos as the Dramatic Squirrel and
the Chris Crocker - LEAVE BRITNEY ALONE! received on Youtube clearly demonstrates that on the online viral platform traditional advertising strategies have to
be reformulated. As argued by Godin (2001) consumer to consumer communication
clearly outweighs advertiser to consumer communication in the modern era and
therefore requires as new perspective on advertising as a whole. Indeed Smith et al.
(2007) found that peer to peer communication is not limited to highly involved elites
but rather is predominant amongst all kinds of users.
Limitations and future research:

The current study suffers from several key limitations many of which resulted from
the fact that the study is largely exploratory and deals with a relatively uninvestigated
area of scholarship. One of the limitations has to do with the fact that the sample that
is used in the study is a convenience sample rather than a random sample. Another
970

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (2008) 959972 2008 International Communication Association

key limitation of the study is its highly descriptive nature that does not allow for
a high level analysis. Future studies should provide more sophisticated analyses of the
viral advertising phenomenon. Multivariate procedures may be useful in better
identifying the nature of viral advertising strategies across industries and in comparison to other online media advertising formats. In addition, future studies ought
to further explore the use of Taylors six-segmented strategy wheel as a model for the
analysis of creative strategies.
References
Arndt, J. (1967). Word of mouth advertising: A review of the literature. New York: Advertising
Research Foundation.
Burns, K. and Lutz, R, J. From fabulously entertaining to freakishly annoying: Consumer
responses to six online advertising formats. Paper presented at the national conference of
the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (August, 2004).
Chiu, H-G., Hsieh, Y-C., Kao, Y-H. and Lee, M. (2007). The determinants of email receivers
disseminating behaviors on the Internet. Journal of Advertising Research. p.524535.
Cunningham, A. and Jenner, E. Advertising theory beyond the context of advertising:
Taylors six-segment message strategy wheel offers an integrated Model of Political
Behavior. Paper presented at the national conference of the Association for Education in
Journalism and Mass Communication (August, 2003).
Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.
Godin, S. (2001). Unleashing the idea virus: Stop marketing at people! Turn your ideas into
epidemics by helping your customers do the marketing for you. New York: Hyperion.
Hwang, J. S., McMillan, S. J., and Lee, G., 2003. Corporate Web Sites as Advertising: An Analysis
of Function, Audience and Message Strategy. Journal of Interactive Advertising. 3(2).
Helm, S. (2000). Viral marketing establishing customer relationships by word-of mouse.
Electronic Markets, 10(3), 158161.
Hennig-Thurau T., Gwinner K. P., Walsh G., Gremler D. D. (2004) Electronic
Word-of-Mouth via Consumer-Opinion Platforms: What Motivates Consumers to
Articulate Themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing 18(1), 3852
Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, MA:
Addison-Wesley.
Howard, T. (2005) Viral advertising spreads through marketing plans, USA Today, June
22, B6.
Jurvetson, Steve (2000), What is Viral Marketing? Accessed on April 20, 2008, from http://
www.dfj.com/cgi-bin/artman/publish/steve_may00.shtml
Kaikati A. M. & Kaikati, J. G. (2004). Stealth marketing: How to reach customers
surreptitiously. California Management Review, 46(4), 622.
Kim, J. W., Lee, B. S., Shaw, M. J., Chang, H.-L., & Nelson, M. (2001). Application of
decision-tree induction techniques to personalized advertisements on Internet
storefronts. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5(3), 4562.
Lee, G. (2000, August). Differences in the Use of Message Strategies Between the U.S. and
Korean Television Automobile Commercials. Paper presented at the national conference
of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication.

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (2008) 959972 2008 International Communication Association

971

Lee, G, Nam, K. J and Hwang, J. S. Message strategies of American and Korean television
commercials. in Charles R. Taylor, ed., The Proceedings of the 2001 Conference of the
American Academy of Advertising, 2930.
Nyilasy, Greg (2005), Word-of-Mouth: What do we really know? And what we dont. In,
Kirby, Justin and Paul Marsden, Eds. Connected marketing. London, UK:
Butterworth-Heinemann, 16184.
Phelps, J. E., Lewis, R., Mobilio, L., Perry, D., & Raman, N. (2004). Viral marketing or
electronic word-of-mouth advertising: Examining consumer responses and motivations
to pass along email. Journal of Advertising Research, 44(4), 333348.
Porter, L. & Golan, G. J. (2006) From subservient chickens to brawny men: A comparison of
viral advertising to television advertising. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6 (2). http://
www.jiad.org/vol6/no2/porter/index.htm
Puto, C., P. and Wells, W. D. (1984), Informational and Transformational Advertising: The
Differential Effects of Time. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, Thomas C. Kinner, ed.
Provo, UT: Association of Consumer Research, 638643.
Taylor, R. E. (1999) A Six-Segment Message Strategy Wheel. Journal of Advertising Research,
39, 717.
Taylor, R. E. Outside the box, inside the circle: Using the six-segment strategy wheel to
predict direction of change in message strategies. Paper presented at the national
conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication
(August, 2005).
Welker, C. B. (2002). The paradigm of viral communication. Information Services and Use, 22,
38.

Author Biographies

Guy J. Golan (Ph.D Florida, 2003) is an assistant professor at Seton Hall Universitys
Department of Communication. His research focuses on media effects, international
communication and strategic communication research. Golan is a partner in the
Keta-Keta viral advertising agency, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Lior Zaidner is a graduate student of marketing at the University Of Westminster in
London. He formerly served as the creative director for Keta-Keta, Viral Advertising
firm and as a TV cooperation manager for Jetix, Disney owned kids Channel in
Europe.

972

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (2008) 959972 2008 International Communication Association