The document outlines areas for improvement for both the prosecution and opposition teams from their participation in a mock trial competition. For the prosecution, improvements include referring to legal precedents, having clear arguments, proving the case beyond a reasonable doubt, considering alternative arguments, assigning clear roles to team members, and preparing effective direct and cross examinations. For the opposition, improvements involve adhering to the closing address script, raising relevant objections, and employing emotional appeals which the presiding magistrate favored.
The document outlines areas for improvement for both the prosecution and opposition teams from their participation in a mock trial competition. For the prosecution, improvements include referring to legal precedents, having clear arguments, proving the case beyond a reasonable doubt, considering alternative arguments, assigning clear roles to team members, and preparing effective direct and cross examinations. For the opposition, improvements involve adhering to the closing address script, raising relevant objections, and employing emotional appeals which the presiding magistrate favored.
The document outlines areas for improvement for both the prosecution and opposition teams from their participation in a mock trial competition. For the prosecution, improvements include referring to legal precedents, having clear arguments, proving the case beyond a reasonable doubt, considering alternative arguments, assigning clear roles to team members, and preparing effective direct and cross examinations. For the opposition, improvements involve adhering to the closing address script, raising relevant objections, and employing emotional appeals which the presiding magistrate favored.
The document outlines areas for improvement for both the prosecution and opposition teams from their participation in a mock trial competition. For the prosecution, improvements include referring to legal precedents, having clear arguments, proving the case beyond a reasonable doubt, considering alternative arguments, assigning clear roles to team members, and preparing effective direct and cross examinations. For the opposition, improvements involve adhering to the closing address script, raising relevant objections, and employing emotional appeals which the presiding magistrate favored.
Clarity in your arguments are vital Focus on proving the case beyond a reasonable doubt Access other alternatives for arguments presented - E.g. we failed to mention that the tablets administered through the coffee would have dissolved. The opposition argued that the 20 tablets needed would have been obvious through observation. Devise clear roles for each member of the team Ask open questions during direct examination On the contrary, closed questions should be used for cross examination Aim for objections to have a positive influence Prepare clear reasons for objections
Opposition
Closing address must adhere to the script provided
Raise relevant objections wherever possible Emotion appeal was favoured by the Magistrate