Professional Documents
Culture Documents
05 Brettman
05 Brettman
05 Brettman
Purpose
The intent of this guideline is to provide practical
guidance for the proper interpretation of NDT results
on ACIP and DD piles.
NDT of deep foundations can generally be divided
into two categories:
(1) low strain or nuclear radiation methods which
evaluate integrity, and
(2) high strain methods which primarily evaluate
capacity as well as pile integrity.
This guideline focuses on the evaluation of integrity
using low strain methods.
NDT Controversy
Many methods and versions available
Experiences with NDT have ranged from very good
to complete failure
Reliability of methods have been questioned
NDT practitioners are unwilling (or unable) to make
quantitative judgements
NDT can create more questions than answers in
some cases
Need Analysis Collateral to properly interpret NDT
results
Figure courtesy of
Pile Dynamics Inc
A
B
C
Example test results created using the wave propagation
simulation computer program PileWave
Sonic Logging
Crosshole for large piles and singlehole for small
(<24 inch) piles
Developed to overcome sonic echo limitations
Access tubes must be installed in piles
Potential for debonding between PVC and grout is a
problem
Typical testing rate is 1 to 10%
Berkel&Company
Sonic Logging
Interpretation of Results
Analysis Collateral
Additional information that makes analysis and
interpretation of nondestructive deep foundation
integrity test data easier and more effective.
(Hertlein 2009 ASCE GSP No. 185)
This step should be done prior to performing any
testing.
10
Communication
Prompt analysis and reporting are usually critical to
a successful project
Unless full site information is available immediately
to the tester, the analysis and report may be delayed
or will be based upon limited information until the
previously specified analysis collateral information
has been obtained, reviewed and considered
A report that reaches the contractor and/or Owner
mentioning some anomaly originally found several
weeks earlier is generally disturbing at least, and
highly problematic if the contractor has de-mobilized
from the site
11
Anomaly Evaluation
After all the data have been reviewed and analyzed,
any anomalies should be evaluated to determine if
flaws or defects may be present in the pile
The determination of a flaw or defect in a pile should
not be made from the NDT results alone
Since NDT results can be misinterpreted, there
should always be some corroborating evidence that
would produce those results in the pile
Comment
Acceptablepile
LongpilepotentiallytoolongforNDTtestcapability,high
pileresistancelimitstestingdepth,and/ormajorbulges
No defect apparent, no toe arepresent Maybeanacceptablepilesubjecttoreview
ofinstallationrecords
signal
Probableflawatdepthx,
toeapparent
Probabledefectatdepthx,
notoesignal
Inconclusiverecord
Seesectionbelowregardingevaluationandremediation
optionsforflaws
Seesectionbelowregardingevaluationandremediation
optionsfordefects
FurtherdiscussionwithNDTpractitionerisrequiredas
wellaspotentiallyotherNDTtestingtechniques
12
SIGNAL
DISTORTION/STRENGTH
CONCRETE RATING
010
None/normal
energyreduction6dB
Good(G)
1020
>20
NoSignal
~60
INDICATED CONDITIONS
Acceptablequality
concrete
Minor/lower
Minorcontamination,
energyreduction6.1to9 Questionable(Q) intrusion,orquestionable
dB
qualityconcrete
Contamination,intrusion
Severe/muchlower
Poor/defect(P/D) and/orpoorquality
energyreduction>9dB
concrete
Intrusionorseveredefect;
None
NoSignal(NS) couldalsobecausedby
tubedebonding
Severe/muchlower
energyreduction>12dB
Water(W)
Waterintrusionorwater
filledgravelintrusionwith
fewornofines
Summary
When data from integrity tests on deep foundations
indicate the presence of an anomaly, the analyst
should follow a three-step process
1. Confirm that the test was performed in accordance with
applicable standards
2. Once it has been verified that the anomaly is an irregularity in
the foundation, its significance must be evaluated
3. The geotechnical engineer should review the pile design
parameters to assess the likely effect of the irregularity of the
pile
13