utc ade ste: Collaborative Work Skills: Staff Evaluation ‘Teacher Name: Carney ‘Yar uble Peto Rubster(ntpiubistarAtoachars.org) Student Name CATEGORY [67 [as es [o-t [attitude INeverispublcy [Rarelyie pubic, |Occasionalyis|Oten pubic rial afte projec [oitoaotthe project [publ al ofthe| ral ete project lortne work of or the work of ater |projecor the wok oor the werk of oP loners. Alvays'nas alten has a postive jaltermembers of [members ofthe postive atluce |atiude aboutme line group. Usually |group. Oten nas 9 about asks). faci) Inasapositve |negaive aide Jstiudebouttme |aoutine asx), ski [Working with |Amostaiways [Usual iseneto, |Oten stereo, |Rerelylsens to [others sions to, shares shares, wih, and’ |shares wit and shares win, and Jwin,ara'suppors supports eforts fsupporisin efors [supports he els Ine ctorsofeiers, loromners.Does nat Jofomers, but lotomers. tenis Hes to keep peopl eause "waves" inthe [sometimes isnot 2 eto, ara [whats routed working wot |group [pe0d team momber, ogemer. [Quality of Work | rovses worcartne [Prondos hgh [Proves worthat [Provides wok hat righestquaty. —|aualiy work Joceasionaly needs [usualy needs to be lobe checked or [checked er redone redone by omer joy hers to ensure group mambereto_|quaty. feneure quai. [Contributions —|Rouinely provides |Usualy proves |Somoimes prowdes [Rarely provises lusetlidesswnen lueotlidons wen |usatlideaswhen Jusetul dese wren Inarcipaing inthe Jparipatng In twefparicipatng athe |parcipaing in tho Jorup aiscuesion.A Jyroupin eiscusson, [group discussion. A group discussion, Jsctinteleaderwho |Astong group [sallsfactory group |ay refuse to ontibulesa iota! |member who vies |memoerwho does |parcpate. hor emer gin pee PAR Urn = 25a 0‘Yar Rte Pree Wow Dependability |Asove average in |Usvally dependable,|Sometmes lUnctiable, lsependaciiy neglect or eareless. [Problom-solving |Acively ook for Raines soufone — |Doesnol suggest or [Dae notty b salve and suggests [suggested by ohrs,rotne solutons, but [problems or help Isoluions 0 siting toy out others solve probems. [slutons suggeste |prabiems by otters. Jthers do he work, [Timo- Routinely uses te |Usualy uses tne [Tends [Rarey gets tings management —[uelitroughostte Jwelltwoughoutthe |provasinate.but__|éoneby he proectioensure |project.butmay aways gets things. |deadines AND rings getdone on |have procrastinate |done bythe loroup hast aust lime. Group does Jon one ting. croup |deaanes. Group deadlines or work lnotnave'teacjust |éoes notnave to [does atnavete |responsiities ldeadines orwork [adjustdeastines or |aghstdeadines or because ofthis Jesponsitities work esponsibities [work responsibilies [persons inadequate because oftus loccauseottns [because atts /bme management person's person's lperons Jpwoerastraton. [procrastination _[procrasinaton [Professional [Demonsvaied |Demonsratea | Demonstrated below [Die nal demonstale IGrowth Javove average average laveroge any professional Jrotessional grown. lprotessional growth, [profesional grow. growth. initiative rakes niiatves on [Requires some [Does natiiiate |Never nates any es.980% orthetasks, [arectons take fiasks or asks or te creation nitatve to compete [devetopmectot Jor discovery ot lacks independent [soltene on 60% of |soivions. asks. [Punctuality & One or ess apse of [One or ess lapse of [Malipie lapses of Ful ofexcases Lale [attendance foneatiiectena lone ottrecntens |multpie tera per jon a reguarbass, per mont. Jperweek wack orleaves early [Tatos tequentor long breaks. Not valle dunng [work hour, panier done eta PviaRUee 26S eerxvas Youre ert aw action Thome Copyright® 2000-2007 Advanced Leaming Technologies in Education Consorta ALTEC. hip: stescherombeerphprccerTenwouse pundit enone. cee Pier 25S tur «