Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Canmedaj00439 0082
Canmedaj00439 0082
Eetroppect
NOTES ON THE CLINICAL SIGNS OF
INFANTILE RICKETS AS OBSERVED
IN VIENNA*
H. P. WRIGHT, M.D.t
Montreal
All recent clinical investigation has emphasized the difficulty of establishing a standard
for the diagnosis of rickets. Moreover when
signs are definite the stage of the disease is
difficuilt to determine and for this x-ray plates
are almost essential. Cases are frequently seen,
in young infants, where marked clinical stigmata are associated with an x-ray picture showing the bone lesions nearly healed.
In the Vienna experience, which was concerned exclusively with infants under 18
months, craniotabes, beading of the ribs and
cranial bossing proved the most reliable signs
of early rickets.
Craniotabes is by most writers believed to be
a rachitic change. Holt and Howland state
that it occurs in infants under six months of
age; that it is a rachitic manifestation, and depends in no wise upon syphilis. Hess and
Meyer (1922) are of the opinion that on account of the many qualifications with which
it is attended, craniotabes must be regarded as
an unreliable sign of rickets. In young infants
under three months there i, the difficulty, insurmountable in many cases, of differentiating
it from the cranial softening of the new born,
which is not truly rachitic. They consider it
has its greatest significance after six months
of age.
Hughes inclines to the view that craniotabes
is always a sign of rickets and divides this
sign into (1) foetal, and (2) infantile craniotabes. Dalywell and Mackay are of the opinion
that the presence of craniotabes supervening
after birth can in practice be accepted as evidlence of rickets. The possibility of confusion
with congenital softening is a very real difficulty, but in the experience of these writers
the distribution of the softening is somewhat
different. Congenital delayed ossification, especially in premature babies, was not infrequent, and affected particularly the vertex of
the skull between the anterior and posterior
fontanelles, as well as all sutures. Craniotabes
usually appeared first as a patchy softening
along the occipito-parietal sutures. The vertex
of the skull was not usually involved, but it was
common to find all sutures abnormally pliable.
In the most severe cases seen, the whole
cranial vault was affected and a large part of
it was of ru-bber-like consistency. The distribution was uisually a-symetrical which is another
point of difference from congenital softening;
the opinion is widely held in. Vienna that it is
more extensive on the side on which the infant's head habitually rests.
The acceptance by the writers of craniotabes
as a sign of active rickets is based on the following evidence:(a) The seasonal incidence of craniotabes
corresponded with that of rickets.
(b) The majority of young untreated infants
with craniotabes also developed other signs of
rickets.
(c) Young infants with radiographic evidence of active rickets usually had craniotabes
as well. (Of twenty-four infants under twelve
months with radiographic evidence of rickets,
twenty-one had craniotabes).
(d) Therapeutic test, cleared up quickly
under treatment.
The absence of craniotabes in older children
with active rickets is probably due to an alteration in the rate of growth of different bones;
possibly craniotabes is especially likely to develop in any youmg rachitic infants.
In the experience of these writers craniotabes
was usually the earliest sign of infantile rickets
in Vienna and could sometimes be diagnosed
before three months of age. It is a less subjective sign than minor grades of beading, and
its persistence denotes active rickets. Though
frequently present in infants between nine and
321