Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aoki N Bess and Dural Effusions J Neurosurg 1984
Aoki N Bess and Dural Effusions J Neurosurg 1984
M.D.
Y'
20
tervention is indicated, different procedures are required for these two conditions: lumboperitoneal or
ventriculoperitoneal shunting is preferred for enlargement of the subarachnoid spaces, 3 while subdural effusion is usually treated by subdural-peritoneal shunting. 4
For these reasons, it is necessary to differentiate
between subdural effusion and enlargement of the
subarachnoid spaces. Previous neuroimaging studies,
including high-resolution computerized tomography
(CT) scanning, cannot reliably differentiate between
these conditions. In view of this, the advent of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging seems promising for definitively differentiating between subdural effusion and
enlargement of the subarachnoid spaces; however, few
studies have focused on the differentiation of these
conditions by MR images. 9 The aim of the present
study is to elucidate whether MR images, as a single
neuroimaging method, can differentiate between subJ. Neurosurg. I Volume 81 I July, 1994
Results
The intensity of the subdural effusion was greater
than that of CSF in six (75%) of eight patients on Tc
weighted MR images, in all six patients so studied on
proton-density images, and in seven (87.5%) of eight
patients on T2-weighted images (Table 1). Consequently, in all eight patients, at least one sequence of
the MR images demonstrated an intensity greater than
that of CSF (Fig. 1). The flow-void sign, indicating
J. Neurosurg. I Volume 81 I July, 1994
MR Imaging Findings
Age
Case
(mos),
No.
Sex
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
T1Weighted
Image
ProtonDensity
Image
T,Weighted
Image
Etiology
* Imaging appearance relative to cerebrospinal fluid: hyper = hyperintense, iso = isointense. V(-) = absence of vascular flow-void area;
NO = study not done.
FIG. 1. Left: Computerized tomography scan showing extracerebral fluid collections indistinguishable from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Right: Magnetic resonance T1-weighted image demonstrating bilateral subdural effusions, which are
clearly separated from CSF in the subarachnoid spaces. Note
the coexisting enlargement of the subarachnoid spaces on the
right cerebral convexity (asterisk).
N. Aoki
TABLE 2
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features in eight
patients with enlargement of the subarachnoid spaces*
MR Imaging Findings
Case
No.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Age
(mos),
Sex
T,-
T,-
Weighted
Image
ProtonDensity
Image
Weighted
Image
6,F
8,M
iso, V(+)
iso, V(-)
iso, V(+)
iso, V(+)
iso, V(+)
iso, V(+)
9,F
iso,
iso,
iso,
iso,
iso,
iso,
ND
iso,
iso,
iso,
iso,
iso,
iso,
iso,
iso,
iso,
iso,
iso,
4,M
6,M
6,M
3,F
8,M
V(+)
V(-)
V(-)
V(-)
V(-)
V(-)
V(+)
V(+)
V(+)
V(+)
V(+)
V(-)
V(+)
V(+)
V(+)
V(+)
V(+)
Etiology
unknown
Solos
syndrome
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
FIG. 2. Computerized tomography scan (left) and protondensity magnetic resonance (MR) image (right) showing an
abnormal accumulation of fluid, which is identical to cerebrospinal fluid on both neuroimaging studies. Note the vascular flow-void areas (arrows) apart from the cortical surface
on the MR image.
Discussion
The diagnostic approach and treatment indications
for infants with an abnormally enlarged head associated
with an extracerebral fluid collection indistinguishable
from CSF on CT are still uncertain. One reason for this
controversy is associated with the traditional trend in
which subdural effusion and enlargement of the subarachnoid spaces are managed similarly without distinguishing between them. From the author's experience, infants with subdural effusion have often had an
unfavorable prognosis due to an increase in the volume
of the effusion and repeated hemorrhage with subsequent development of chronic subdural hematoma. 2
Previous reports on benign subdural effusion in infancy
seem to include infants with enlargement of the subarachnoid spaces. 612 17 It is necessary to evaluate the
prognosis of the patient with extracerebral fluid collections after differentiating between subdural effusion
and enlargement of the subarachnoid spaces.
Previous neuroimaging studies, including cerebral
angiography, CT with intravenous infusion of contrast
medium, 13 cr subdurography, 4 and ultrasonography, 15
are known to be useful in differentiating between subdural effusion and enlargement of the subarachnoid
spaces; however, cerebral angiography and CT subdurography are not practical because of their invasiveness. Moreover, in my experience, contrast-enhanced
CT and ultrasonography do not always definitely differentiate between the two entities. In fact, in the
present series, the diagnosis of enlargement of the subarachnoid spaces in eight patients was achieved by
contrast-enhanced CT in six (75%) and by ultrasonography in five (62.5%). Magnetic resonance imaging,
used as a single neuroimaging technique, is expected
to offer a definitive differential diagnosis between subdural effusion and enlargement of the subarachnoid
spaces. To my knowledge, however, few studies using
MR imaging have focused on the differentiation of
these two conditions in infancy. 9
22
11.
References
1. Andersson H, Elfverson J, Svendsen P: External hydrocephalus in infants. Childs Brain 11:398-402, 1984
2. Aoki N: Chronic subdural hematoma in infancy. Clinical
analysis of 30 cases in the CT era. J Neurosurg 73:
201-205, 1990
3. Aoki N: Lumboperitoneal shunt: clinical applications, complications, and comparison with ventriculoperitoneal shunt.
Neurosurgery 22:988-1004, 1990
4. Aoki N, Masuzawa H: Bilateral chronic subdural hematomas without communication between the hematoma cavities: treatment with unilateral subdural-peritoneal shunt.
Neurosurgery 22:911-913, 1988
5. Aoki N, Masuzawa H: Infantile acute subdural hematoma.
Clinical analysis of 26 cases. J Neurosurg 61:273-280,
1984
6. Briner S, Bodensteiner J: Benign subdural collections of
infancy. Pediatrics 67:802-804, 1980
7. Carolan PL, McLaurin RL, Towbin RB, et al: Benign extraaxial collection of infancy. Pediatr Neurosci 12:140-144,
1986
8. Date H, Ito C, Yamaura A, et al: [Extracerebral fluid collections in infancy.] CurrTrends Hyd 2:20-27, 1992 (Jpn)
9. Fukushima K, Takagi T, Nagai H, et al: [MRI of subdural
fluid collections in infancy.] Shoni No Noshinkei 13:
381-389, 1988 (Jpn)
10. Masuzawa H, Aoki N, Sato J: [Subdural effusion (hema-
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
23